>
>I was looking at the Altair kit on E-OverPay. The owner says that his
kit
>didn't come with the Altair label. I also have an Altair that was
build
>from a kit. Mine didn't come with the label either. Anybody know why?
>
> Joe
My kit did not have a label with it when shipped either.
I have corresponded with others who tell me their's came
sans label too. One speculated that it is the early ones
which were sent out without labels. Don't know why.
Bob Wood
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
First I am Maurice Hamm 30 years old and living in the Netherlands.
I have a privite collection of old Radio's, Tv's and computers.
The datapoint 1800, a dec pdp 11/23, a zx81, a commodore 64, a IBM 8086
etc.
What has happend.
I have reorgenized my collection room and got the craziesed idea to
start up my DATAPOINT 1800 computer. (1980 )
This was my first computer and had for several years lot of fun with it.
I am industrious seeking for somebody that knows something about this
machine or has some information or docs
I got the machine in 1988 and has worked for several years whith it.
But now after several years I start up the machine and it did not start
up, the screen keeps black !!
There is power in the machine, the disks spins and the picture tube is
glowing.
There is also no response of the keyboard.
I think the ROM is emty.
There is no self test.
I know for certain that it was in a working state the last time I had
used the machine +/- 7 years ago.
I opened the case to look for bad fuses or contacts but every thing
looks ok.
What has gone wrong?
Question:
I know its a long time and a very, very old machine But I just like to
see this machine working again.
The comp. works under DOS.G
I have several programes and documentation and a wheel printer attached
to this comp..
Please help me.
Greatings, and a Happy new Year,
Maurice Hamm
You have GOT to see this page! It will sure as heck lighten up your day,
especially if you're looking at the ice collect on the phone and power
lines like I am.....
http://viperspit.com/funny.html
Check the "dancing baby" page out as well, very funny.
And now back to our regularly scheduled mailing list....
Hi,
I've got a Qantel model 10 system sitting around the house.
My wife used to (I guess she still does occasionally) program
on it.
Qantel was a hardware manufacturer out of Hayward Ca.
They went out of business (sort of) around 1987/88. I say
'sort of' because I think Mohawk Data Systems bought
the support rights. I also think that someone may have
attempted recently to relaunch parts of their product line.
Anyway this system isdefinitely 10 years old. I'd like to see
what hardware documentation might be floating around out
there for this.
In particular I have a real nice High-speed line printer that
I would like to get service and interface info on. It was
manufacture by Teletype but I haven't been able to find a
model number on it and I didn't want to disassemble it
right now.
It is currently still working fine, but I'd like to connect it to
some other equipment. From the little I've examine it, it
appears that it might be a current loop interface (the era
is right for this also).
Anyone familiar with this printer?
Thanks,
Jon
> > So I built the PC to 8 inch floppy converter and
> > got the software working (see other message).
> > I have tested four of the six drives I have and...
> > THEY ALL WORK!
> > Not only that, but they all agree with each other.
> > That is, a disk formatted and written on one drive
> > will read on any other drive.
> >
> > Can I assume that this means they are all
>
> What you've done is called an 'interchangeablity test' in the manuals. It
> doesn't mean all the drives are correctly aligned, or even that they're
all
> aligned exactly the same. It does mean, though that they're all pretty
close.
> It's possible that they're all way off, but I doubt it. After all, how
would
> they have all been aligned to each other?
>
> So I think it's safe to say that they're probably aligned well enough to
use.
Now I'm 6 for 6. All six work, all pass interchangeability. For those
keeping score:
3 Seimens model FDD 200-8P
1 Seimens model FDD 120-8
1 Seimens model FDD 100-8
1 Shugart model 801 (missing one cap)
Now to go through and jiggle all of the boards in the C3-D, power it up
and see if she boots. Wish me luck.
Can anyone point me to a good utility for testing memory that DOS 6.22
(HIMEM) occaisionally reports as suspect? I'm looking for something
other than yanking the SIMM's out, and testing them (it's a govt owned
'puter, and the repair person 'll take forever if I don't provide some
kind of
serious guidance as to the cause of the problem).. Yeah, I've thought
of opening it up, and cleaning the contacts on the SIMMS etc, but, as
a Contractor Employee, I don't want to risk getting my company getting
blamed for anything..
AdvTHANKSance
Will
I have an IBM XT with monitor & keyboard. Anyone interested?
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
I was looking at the Altair kit on E-OverPay. The owner says that his kit
didn't come with the Altair label. I also have an Altair that was build
>from a kit. Mine didn't come with the label either. Anybody know why?
Joe
In a message dated 12/31/98 9:42:11 PM EST, adavie(a)mad.scientist.com writes:
<< I wonder if there are other examples of
ins/outs that you oldies remember and would care to share. Things that were
ubiquitous and no longer with us. >>
how about BBSs? they are still around, but with the net catching on and
everyone getting on it, bulletin boards are all but forgotten it seems.
> On Thursday, December 31, 1998 7:49 PM, Andrew Davie wrote:
> A gent I've just traded with to obtain a boxed SYM-1 casually
What version of SYM is it? I have a SYM that is a slightly later one,
1.1? It's not the one that took a 680x chip (version 2?), but the one
after the VIM. I'm looking for a manual, or at least a photocopy of the
schematics. Someone from Australia sent me an old SYM manual set, but it
was for the earlier VIM.
He also sent along the BASIC and RAE (assembler) proms. I'm keeping the
BASIC, but would be willing to trade the RAE for a SYM manual.
Al McCann
amc358(a)interserv.com
Hello.
I have a WANG WLTC computer that I would like to either sell for a
reasonable price, or trade for another laptop/portable computer (preferably
classic).
Here are the specs:
-8086 (8MHz?)
-10MB internal HD
-WANG compatible LCD (can emulate CGA or Hercules)
-Built-in thermal printer w/plain-paper capability (ribbon available)
-512K RAM
-50-pin Centronics SCSI port for floppy drive, external HD, etc.
This computer supposedly has an in-ROM wordprocessor and spreadsheet, but I
have yet to figure out how to get into them.
I have a not-so-good battery for it, so it will occasionally not boot (sort
of like the Mac Portable - must have a charged battery to run correctly).
The internal P/S has a small problem in that it will occasionally blow a
cap. I think this is either caused by the bad battery or because some of
the other electrolytics are starting to go bad (I have no way of testing
them).
It requires an 18vDC, 1.5 amp external P/S, which I don't have.
The person that I previously had a deal with seems to have backed out again,
so I'm offering it to the first person that responds with a reasonable
offer.
I have two WLTC's , and I don't like to have more than one of a single type
of computer, so I'm offering it here, where someone would would possibly be
able to fix/use it. I'd say that it's a fairly durable computer, since my
other one has nearly (a guess) 27,000 hours on the HD, with no bad sectors,
it still ran fine, even after it was dropped, until the external P/S got
zapped last year. Now I run it off of three 6v Power Wheels batteries.
If anyone is interested, or wants a picture of it, send me a personal email,
and I can send you one (about 40k).
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
PS>> If anyone has any spare WLTC power bricks, and you want to sell one,
let me know. -ThAnX!
<The "glass capacitors" that look like diodes look that way because they =
<ARE diodes. It turns out that one of the cheapest and best ways to make =
<0.1uF capacitors is to make two diodes in the same case, in series with =
This is inaccurate. The size of the junction needed to create a .1uF cap
would be huge. It would not be cheap nor effective. The cap inside is
similar in construction to those now seen on SMT loaded cards.
It is possible to make caps using the junction and there are devices
that use this principle. However the capacitance is A) variable with
voltage imposed across the reverse biased junction and B) 300-500pf is
about the upper limit for them. They are known as varactor or varicap
diodes and are not found on SA8XX drives.
The glass caps were generally just a different package with one advantage
in that glass is hermetic. Or better said compared to plastics and some
ceramics they are impervious to moisture.
Allison
The "glass capacitors" that look like diodes look that way because they ARE diodes. It turns out that one of the cheapest and best ways to make 0.1uF capacitors is to make two diodes in the same case, in series with opposite polarities (it never conducts because one of the diodes is always back biased). The back-biased junction forms the capacitor, and it has very good characteristics for bypass (decoupling).
As for the 104 notation, this is 10**4 (ten to the 4th power). Thats 10,000 pF = 0.1 uF. 50V is the voltage rating.
Barry Watzman
On Jan 1, 0:08, Tony Duell wrote:
> Yes.. 104 -> 10*10^4 pf (read the numbers like the bands on a resistor,
> but in pf) = 0.1uF. The Z is the tolerance, I think. 50V is the maximum
> working voltage.
Yes, the letter is the tolerance, as defined in IEC 63(1963) (and possibly
elsewhere). J=5% K=10% M=20% and Z means "something else" or "not very
good" or "unclassified", often +20% -80%.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Mr "TV Dog" is back up and around with his MSDOS/Tandy 1000 realm and
has posted a page of general purpose software for internet use on older
non-windows machines at http://www.agate.net/~tvdog/internet.html
Just in case you wanted to know <g>
<The AIM-65 (single-board, full keyboard, LED display and 20-column
<printer on-board), SD Systems Z-80 starter kit, Motorola MEK6800, VIM-1
<(predecessor to the SYM-1).
What about the Intel SDK80, SDK85, SDK88, NEC TK80, the AMI EVKseries and
the IMSAI IMP48?
Allison
<I am fortunate to have recentlyly added a SYM-1 to my collection.
<Could anybody with instructions/documentation for this machine please
<contact me. I'd like to explore the possibility of purchase or trade of
<these documents, or copies. I now have the KIM and SYM - would anybody car
<to suggest another target to aim for? ie: What other single board computer
AS a collector you should study records of the time (magazines and the like)
for your targets. IT would give you a better idea of the significance and
the relationships of thse items.
FYI: AIM-65 would be one to looks for.
Allison
On Dec 31, 20:01, Sam Ismail wrote:
> AppleSoft didn't have a PRINT @ statement so chalk that one up to my
> arrogant ignorance. Interestingly though, Woz squeezed the '@' symbol
> on to the original Apple ][ keyboard above the P key (shift-P = @). Who
> knows why. The @ wasn't used for anything inherent in the Apple.
It follows teletype usage, I think; CTRL-SHIFT-@ = CTRL-@ = NUL Probably
Woz had a use for 'NUL' rather than '@'.
w.r.t. "PRINT @", several BASICs (but not Applesoft) had "PRINT AT"
instead.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>The AIM-65 (single-board, full keyboard, LED display and 20-column
>printer on-board), SD Systems Z-80 starter kit, Motorola MEK6800, VIM-1
>(predecessor to the SYM-1).
>
I have a full doc set for the AIM-65 if anyone needs any info on this
machine.
Happy new year all!
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
>> to suggest another target to aim for? ie: What other single board
computers
>> from the era, with on-board keypads, would be fitting companions for the
SYM
>> and KIM?
>
>The AIM-65 (single-board, full keyboard, LED display and 20-column
>printer on-board), SD Systems Z-80 starter kit, Motorola MEK6800, VIM-1
>(predecessor to the SYM-1).
>
>There are many more, but you only wanted those with on-board keypads.
>
A few more keypad systems immediately come to mind..
Heathkit ET3400: 680x based
HP5036A: 8085 based
IMSAI 8048 controllers:
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
Hi,
I have some old memory boards that use the EMM SEMI 4200 Chip (the same
as the Altair 16K Static RAM 16-MCS Board uses). They have TRI-DATA etched
into the copper. They also have "MCI 1" in white silk screen on the card.
They have a strange configuration: 6 Bit colum X 4 Bit row. They also
have an EPROM on board.
Does any one know where they came from, what they are used for and if
they are worth anything.
If they are worth something, I would be willing to exchange them for a
fair price. If they aren't worth anything, I'll just scrap them and sell
the memory for use with an Altair.
At any rate, if anyone knows anything about them, I would appreciate
knowing about them.
Thanks,
Neil.
On Dec 31, 20:07, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> As for the function keys, until recently I think the only thing I'd ever
> used them for was WordPerfect. Now I use them all the time on VT420's,
and
> wish I knew how to set them on a RS/6000. They would probably be used a
> LOT more if people knew how, or if there was some nice UNIX/Mac/Windoz
Apps
> for setting them to do stuff (of course there probably is, but I can't
> think of any).
I use them a lot too, partly because on my Unix box there's a little
utility called 'bindkey' to assign arbitrary strings to keys. It works for
any keys, but generally I find it more useful to assign command strings to
function keys, and I'm used to programming strings into function keys on
other micros (BBC Micro, Archimedes, mostly).
The insert() and string(string) functions in xterm should allow you to
program your function keys, but it's a bit tedious by hand, I expect.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
At 10:38 PM 12/22/98 -0600, you wrote:
> size keyboard and a 3x40 line lcd display. machine also has connections for
> rs232, telephone, and din plugs for modem and printer. machine can also run
>I tried to buy a lot of those once. I thought they were portable
>terminals, but they turn out to be "portable paging entry terminals" used
>to send pages to pagers, I assume.
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> 25229 : This also has the 40 pin ASIC but with a totally different
> layout. C1 is a 0.1uF cap Near the power connector. CR1 is a 1N4148 a few
> components back from the middle of the front edge. There are 2 zeners,
> CR8 (12V) near the head connector and CR18 (2.4V) about halfway between
> the front edge of the board and pin 1 of the 40 pin chip
That's the one! I suck at ASCII art so lets try text. Looking
at the board component side towards me, 50 pin edge connector
up. In the upper right corner is a tin can cap aligned veritically,
silk screen seems to be "C26". To its left is the power connector.
Below it, aligned horizontally, is a clear component with bright
copper ends and fine black print which (straining my eyes) seems
to read:
104
Z
50V
The silkscreen that seems to be associated with it is "C25".
Directly below that is where the missing component was,
also aligned horizontally. The silkscreen that seems to be
associated with that position is "C1". The leads that remianed
had the same bright copper ends still attached. There were
bits of curshed clear material stuck to the board.
In a message dated 12/31/98 10:14:47 PM EST, sinasohn(a)ricochet.net writes:
<< > size keyboard and a 3x40 line lcd display. machine also has connections
for
> rs232, telephone, and din plugs for modem and printer. machine can also run
>I tried to buy a lot of those once. I thought they were portable
>terminals, but they turn out to be "portable paging entry terminals" used
>to send pages to pagers, I assume.
>From my research into alphapaging standards (I was working on a program for
the RS m100 to use it as an alphapaging station) I believe that is exactly
what it is. A tech from airtouch recommended I just buy one of those
instead of writing my own program. (Probably shoulda listened; the pgm
isn't done yet.) >>
well, if anyone wants this alphamate, just let me know. i dont want it.
Before I go into the detail, let me first say that this bug likely
is as old as V5.5 (I only have looked at the V5.6 code
on a friend's system) which is when extended device drivers
were first introduced. So, we can say that the bug is about
10 years old and qualifies for this list since V5.5 of RT-11
was released in 1989.
The bug in RT-11 occurs when RT-11 has had a SYSGEN to allow
extended device drivers and a device driver which is extended
(allows more than 8 devices - in my case, I was using a DU:
MSCP device driver which allowed 64 partitions). In a test
case, the following sequence produces a crash:
SRUN KEX.SAV/LEVEL:n/NAME:KEXn for n = 1 => 6
after each do a CTRL/B to return to the background
Then do:
ABORT KEXn for n = 1 => 6
UNLOAD KEXn for n = 1 => 6
I tried this under RT11XM on V5.6 with an RL02 being
the boot device and DU: being auto-installed and not
referenced the whole time. In the actual situation,
DU: was being referenced on a magneto optical disk
drive to obtain specified files, but the DU: device
driver was not LOADed since there was insufficient
space left in low memory. So, although there are
probably a number of work arounds, the real problem
is that UNLOAD has a bug and does not work correctly
in these circumstances.
UNLOAD in KMOVLY has a bug, as far as I can understand.
In fact, possibly more than one. But, for now, just one that I can
handle. It would seem, in addition, that co-ordination between
different portions of the monitor may not have been done very
successfully since the USR does have the correct code to handle
the situation (a "Beq" instruction) while UNLOAD seems to
want to ignore the problem. Of course, if the USR had not
handled the problem correctly, there are likely going to be many
more occasions when the bug would have occurred, so in the
USR it was caught and the code is correct.
The exact description of the bug and owner tables may not be
correct. If so, please refer to the SSM. But the essential nature
of the bug is, I believe, correctly described.
THE PROBLEM, from what I can understand, is that in UNLOAD,
a system job MAY "own" a specific device (done via a LOAD
command). There is a two word owner table entry for each device
which has 4 bits allowed for each of the possible 8 drives normally
associated (DU0: => DU7:) with each device driver. When a
SYSGEN is done which includes extended device drivers, that
owner table entry of two words is too small and is used to "point"
to a 16 word (maximum size) table within the device driver ONLY
when the device driver is LOADed (I presume that a .FETCH may
also allocate the same 16 words, but they would not be used). SO
IF THE DEVICE DRIVER IS INSTALLed, BUT NOT LOADed,
the two word owner table entry can't "point" anywhere and the pointer
word is set at a default of zero. In the USR, when that word is picked
up, a "Beq" is used to detect that the device driver has not yet been
LOADed and no owner specific code is executed. BUT, UNLOAD
in KMOVLY does not have that instruction ("Beq") and merrily goes
and assumes that the extended device driver owner table entry (in the
case of an extended device driver SYSGENed system PLUS an
actual extended device driver such as DU:) is at the location starting
at zero. In the process of disconnecting the system job from a device
driver, the first 16 words in low memory are assumed to contain the
owner table entry AND the 8 vectors there (00 => 34 - which
obviously includes the EMT vector) can be "MODIFIED". Which
results in crashes in RT-11. If anyone is truly interested in this bug,
but does not understand what I have stated - the explanation I
have given is only a small portion of all the detail, please inquire
further.
Since this bug has not been encountered before - or if anyone has
but was unable to track it down - then likely the situation does not
occur very often. When DU: is resident, obviously DU: has been
LOADed. But I suspect that an extended LD: which is not LOADed
could also cause the same problem. The simple solution that I was
told about a number of years ago (when I had not yet been informed
that it was UNLOAD which was causing the problem) is to not
do the UNLOAD, but to instead do a BOOT which, of course,
does an UNLOAD of everything.
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
Tim Hotze wrote:
>I agree here, too. Windows 95 really won't like a 486/20. Sure, in
>theory, it SHOULD boot, but your lifetime warranty on RAM might
>expire before you get to see a Start button.
Win95 OSR1 runs fine on my 486 33MHz. Well, good enough to run the
occasional game of multi-player Doom at any rate. Now if only I could work
out how it managed to upgrade itself from an SX to a DX whilst I was
installing Win95 ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, 25 December 1998 2:20
Subject: Re: vaugue musings...
>
>> Merry Christmas All
>> It's after 7:30pm Xmas Eve, and it's 36C.
>> Seeya
>
>If it wasn't for Christmas, I'll hate you for teasing us
>with this ridicoulus temperatures while we have -3C :)
Want to swap? I HATE summer. My shop is not airconditioned and
I can't take computers apart while I'm dripping on to the boards.
I really like cold weather. Mind you, it never gets below 0C here,
except maybe a couple below during the mid winter nights.
>Anyway, Fr?hliche Weihnacht to all of you.
And to you all. It's 9pm on Christmas Day, we had a cool
southerly change, and the temp is now a very comfortable
22C or so. But it's still 30+ in the shop. Gonna have to get
some exhaust fans or an evaporative cooler at least......
We had Xmas Dinner outside around the BBQ, but it was
a bit warm even there.
Cheers
Geoff Roberts
Computer Room Internet Cafe
Port Pirie
South Australia.
netcafe(a)pirie.mtx.net.au
So I built the PC to 8 inch floppy converter and
got the software working (see other message).
I have tested four of the six drives I have and...
THEY ALL WORK!
Not only that, but they all agree with each other.
That is, a disk formatted and written on one drive
will read on any other drive.
Can I assume that this means they are all
properly aligned? I find this hard to believe
as two of the drives were mishandled during
shipping so badly that they sheared off their
mounting bolts and a few of the components
on one of the electronics boards were
damaged (more in next message).
Finally, where is write protection enforced?
There is a signal from the drive to the controller.
Is that just for the controllers information or
does the controller enforce the protection?
If the controller or software is bad can a drive
be forced to write to a protected disk?
Bill Sudbrink
> If it has a C1 next to it you can bet it is a capacitor.
> You should have rows of them on the card.
Nope, I'm sure that it was a diode. The ends of it
were still on the leads. There is another one next
to where it was labeled "C25".
> Is it is the one by the resistor and transistor?
> Or the one by the two 'normal' looking capacitors on the other side?
There are no transistors on the board. The diode is in
the corner, near the power connector.
Just for reference, the main component on the board is a
40 pin IC labeled:
AMI KOREA
SHUGART
16271-0
8130B1M
There are only three caps that I see on the board. They
are the little silver can types, no ceramics. They are
labeled "C17", "C22" and "C26".
In a message dated 12/31/98 0:33:13 AM EST, Pjoules1(a)cs.com writes:
<< Agreed, apart from home produced or piarate ones which you have already
pointed out are always suspect. IIRC there have been rare ocasions where
floppies have been distributed with viruses in bulk, one was a batch of
preformatted ones where the master (or duplicating machine or whatever) was
infected with aa boot sector vvirus, and I belive that there has been at
least
on occasion where a major software house accidentally distributed some but
that was many years ago.
>>
i think not long ago that a commercial mac cd was shipped with a virus. can
anyone elaborate?
Using the CP/M FAQ I built a 34 to 50 pin
converter. A couple of notes:
1) read the whole FAQ. The wiring
instructions in Q14 don't take into
account the IBM-PC "floppy twist".
Q16 gives the wiring that worked for
me. Spent an hour scratching my
head on that before I read further.
Primary indicative behavior: seeks
with no head load, software reporting
access attempts with no head load.
2) The Radio Shack General Purpose
Component PC Board (Cat. No.
276-168B) makes a great platform
to build the converter on. Took me
about an hour to solder it up.
3) There seems to be a bug in 22DISK
versions greater than 1.31. The directory
read code does not seem to use the
seek delay. Either that or it simply
misses a head step. It always reports
cylinder 2 read errors. Despite this, it
can format, read and write just fine. It
just can't display directories. Spent
another two hours on that. BTW older
versions of 22DISK can be found with
FTP searches, sorry I don't remember
where I got 1.31 (I downloaded 5 different
versions from different sites).
Bill Sudbrink
Hi! I'm back! I've just been off the list for a few weeks - first a
course, then two weeks ill - and I came into work after Christmas to find
1200 messages waiting for me from Classiccmp.
I am trying to put replies to a few older threads together in this message.
SYSTEM/23
I too have a Datamaster, and a number of the manuals. I think these
machines ought to be kept running, so I'll provide what help I can. The
service manuals are mainly board swappers' guides, but there is some useful
info there if you dig hard enough...
SINGLE INSTANCE MACHINES
Do I have the only Tek 4052? I think there are at least three 4051s on the
list.
I also have an IBM 6150 but I doubt that's unique.
I don't have the only FTS Series 88 on the list - I distinctly remember
giving Tony Duell one for his 21st birthday - but I'd guess I have the only
FTS Series 86.
Oh yes. Tony's P850. Tony wrote:
> Mine was made in about 1971. Last time I powered it up was about 3 months
> ago, and it behaved perfectly. I've had it for about 12 years, and in
> that time it's needed the switch contacts on some of the frontpanel
> switches cleaning, and one new TTL chip in the processor. In other words
> it's pretty reliable.
And you had to re-solder some inter-board connecting wires on the core
memory modules. IIRC these wires were little strips of springy stuff.
Boards wired together with these while lying next to each other, and then
folded over, the springy connecting wire acting as a hinge. Unfortunately
springy wire doesn't take as well to soldering as ordinary wire...
Philip.
I recently unearthed an acquisition from several years ago (and
added it to my home_systems web page).
I have a TC200, a handheld, battery-powered portable terminal
which appears to have been built by IXO, Inc, yet it has a
Digital logo on it (so it either was, or was going to be,
marketed by Digital).
It is powered by a 6v Litium battery, like the kind you find
in a Polaroid film pack (but they are not identical -- the
battery terminals are in different places). It is called
a PolaPulse battery.
Does anyone know of a source for this battery nowadays?
Also, does anyone happen to have any documentation or
other information about this thing?
Thanks in advance...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Dave Dameron wrote:
> OFF topic:
> Max wrote:
> There's little need to make coils these days, and wiring electric lights
> isn't very fun when one can play around with things millions of times
more
> complex.
>
> Hey! I've wound several experimental coils this year. Did you wonder
_how_ a
> transformer works? I know the equations to design one, but am asking
> something more fundamental. The secondary winding of a transformer has
> voltage induced in it, but what couples the energy to it from the primary
> winding's magnetic field?
> (Hint: The magnetic field can be zero at the secondary)
As the list's resident electrical (as opposed to electronic) engineer, I
feel I must make a stab at answering this. Especially since my first job
at PowerGen was research on transformers. (Not at this fundamental level
though - I was looking at fault detection systems)
As I see it, when you have a winding linked with a magnetic field, you
induce a voltage in the winding proportional to the rate of change of the
field. If you like to visualise lines of magnetic flux, the voltage is
related to the number of flux lines that actually cut the wires of the
winding, not the flux linked with the winding at any time.
This means, among other things, that (for sinusoidal ac) the flux is zero
when the voltage is at its peak and vice versa.
The transformer, though, is not a differentiator since the magnetic field
is proportional to the integral of voltage in the primary. That is, flux =
integral (Volts in).dt; (Volts out) = d(flux)/dt (assume = means "is
proportional to")
Note also that the flux depends only on voltage, NOT CURRENT. You
associate magnetic fields with currents (well, I do, anyway), and as you
increase the primary current you expect the field to increase. But it
doesn't. An equal and opposite effect from the secondary current exactly
balances this.
This has a number of implications that are quite important for my current
(pun not intended) job, modelling power systems.
1. The equivalent circuit of a transformer has a branch in parallel with
the primary, the magnetising branch. This is an inductance representing
the magnetic field (and it's in parallel, so it depends only on voltage as
above) and a resistance representing "iron losses"
2. No transformer is perfect. There is regulation - inductance and
resistance apparently in series with it. The resistance represents "copper
loss" - the physical resistance of the windings. The inductance represents
flux in each winding that _does not_ link with the other, and therefore is
not backed off by current in the other winding. But in an electrical
system model, the simplest representation of a tranformer is a series
inductance connecting two sides of the transformer. Ironically, this
represents physically the magnetic field that does not connect the two
sides of the transformer!
3. For metering, protection and the rest, you see a lot of current
transformers. One of these consists of a high current, low voltage primary
- usually a bar running through the middle of the toroidal core - and one
or more multi-turn (low current) secondaries. The equation is simple. The
mmf (magnetomotive force = amps * turns) of all the windings add up to zero
(equal and opposite effect of secondary current again). Because the
measuring kit acts as an effective short circuit on the secondary - or
drops a few volts at most - the magnetising current is almost zero, and you
can thus make very accurate measurememnts.
Is this the answer you wanted?
Final note. What do you mean by "the primary winding's magnetic field" as
distinct from that of the secondary? To a good approximation, the magnetic
field is the same at both the primary and the secondary. It may be close
to zero, for reasons I described. But the difference between the mag.
field at the two windings contributes only to the equivalent series
impedance. It is not something to look at when discussing the detailed
operation of the tranformer.
> As for wiring lights, Christmas tree light strings here are now cheap
series
> strings although the bulbs may have some wire turns wrapped around the
leads
> to prevent a open circuit if a bulb burns out. This often don't work, so
the
> entire string is usually thrown away, like many modern ASIC type computer
boards
Aargh! I've not heard of that (throwing the whole string away) before but
I can well believe it.
Philip.
<> Yes. The 8259 PIC (interrupt controller) is fully programmable for edge
<> and level. It's possibel to go from edge to level on a common PC but you
<
<
<Unfortunately the interrupt inputs on the 8259 are always active high
<(specified clearly in the data sheet), so you still need inverters on all
<the inputs for active-low lines.
Yes and they would be needed as putting raw unbuffered mos inputs on a
bus is bad form.
<all, the reason for having a PC is compatibility. There are plenty of
<nicer machines to hack about with (which is where we started).
yes, multibus and other implmentations were better. Even S100 got that
part right!
Allison
I wonder if it was a mistyped $50.00....
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Clayton <musicman38(a)mindspring.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, December 31, 1998 3:11 PM
Subject: Osborne 01 for only $5000.00
>Gads!! Check this out on eBay !!! Ha! Ha! HeHeHe!!!
>
>An Osborne 01 for an opening bid of only $5000.00 HeHeHe!!!
>As stated in the ad it could be a "Corner Stone" of your computer
>collection..
>
>He is even generous enough to include free shipping.. HeHe!!
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=50980862
>
>Funny thing there are no bids on it yet.. <Grin>
>
>Phil..
>
>
>
I've got a Tandy 600. When I try to boot it, it gives an error message,
seeks the floppy, then shuts off. When I restart it, it says "critical
system error", or something like that, and goes into ROM (MS-WORKS). Then
when I try to access something, it locks.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch(a)30below.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, December 31, 1998 1:37 PM
Subject: ZDTV sightings...
>ZDTV is running a news story on donation of old equipment (right now) and -
>of all things - they had a *big* table full of classic equipment! Just in
>glancing, I saw 2 Tandy 100/102's, I think an Epson HX-20, and -
>wherethehell'dtheygetit??? a Tandy 600! That really caught my eye.
>
>I'd like to find out what they are doing with the machines *after* the
>story...
>
>See ya next year,
>Roger "Merch" Merchberger
>
>
I just obtained a like new CDR-84-1 SCSI cdrom, no docs as usual. I need
info on the jumper block (some may be DIP switches instead) numbered 1-6
on back as well as what speed (I'm guessing 3x) the cdrom is rated for.
If someone out there might knwo where I can get a copy of it's docs or
can scan and attach the pages to me it would be greatly appreciated.
The cdrom is going into my Dell 4066/XE server (#2 of 3) to be used on a
BBS I'm setting back up.
Tony Duell wrote:
> I'm quite sure that things like SPARCbooks are normally considered to be
> both laptops and workstations....
Oh yes. Obvious really. My SPARCbook has no internal floppy drive and
communicates with an external one via the SCSI bus. Since it is my
employer's property, not mine, I haven't dismantled it to see what's
inside, but I imagine a standard floppy drive and an interface board...
Some years ago we had a piece of data acquisition equipment called
MDAS-7000. Originally made by Transera corp., by the time we bought one by
Kaye Instruments. This had a 68000 CPU, a UNIX-alike in ROM (called Rnix),
and built in Tektronix BASIC.
The floppy drive on this was not connected to the CPU board. There was a
separate board controlling it, based around an 80188 CPU, that communicated
with the CPU board via, you guessed it, the SCSI bus.
I wonder if the box still exists, and if so, if I can get my hands on it.
Another potential Single Instance machine, I reckon...
Philip.
Hi Megan,
At 11:56 PM 12/30/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I recently unearthed an acquisition from several years ago (and
>added it to my home_systems web page).
>
>I have a TC200, a handheld, battery-powered portable terminal
>which appears to have been built by IXO, Inc, yet it has a
>Digital logo on it (so it either was, or was going to be,
>marketed by Digital).
>
>It is powered by a 6v Litium battery, like the kind you find
>in a Polaroid film pack (but they are not identical -- the
>battery terminals are in different places). It is called
>a PolaPulse battery.
>
>Does anyone know of a source for this battery nowadays?
>
Would it be this one?
http://www.polaroid.com/products/oem/battery/p100.html
-Dave
In a message dated 30/12/98 21:49:06 GMT Standard Time,
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes:
> What you're not going to get is the odd one or two CD-ROMs that are
> infected, unlike floppies where it could easily happen.
Agreed, apart from home produced or piarate ones which you have already
pointed out are always suspect. IIRC there have been rare ocasions where
floppies have been distributed with viruses in bulk, one was a batch of
preformatted ones where the master (or duplicating machine or whatever) was
infected with aa boot sector vvirus, and I belive that there has been at least
on occasion where a major software house accidentally distributed some but
that was many years ago.
Regards
Pete
In a message dated 29/12/98 11:03:53 GMT Standard Time, tim(a)thereviewguide.com
writes:
>
> Yes, I booted from a write protected floppy, but before that I did a
> virus scan with a normal boot.
A basic precaution of which some are not aware.
> And of course I don't use MS Anit Virus. IIRC, it hasn't been
> updated since 1992 when Windows 3.1 shipped!
>
Once again, you would be surprised how many people trust it.
Regards
Pete
<If I understood, this could be summed up as:
<When an interrupt happens, the interrupt line is pulled low by the
<interrupting device. If it's edge triggered, the CPU can't tell how many
<devices are causing the interrupt and only services the first one.
Assuming the interrupt was active low. the PC made it worse by being edge
and active high...poor.
<And are you saying that if they were level-triggered, I could have two
<devices on IRQ 7?
Yes!
<And is it easy to design a level-triggered equivalent
<to the PC on paper?
Yes. The 8259 PIC (interrupt controller) is fully programmable for edge
and level. It's possibel to go from edge to level on a common PC but you
have to write your own drivers and other drivers would blow up.
<Are all PS/2 s level-triggered or only the MCA ones?
Only MCA.
Allison
Recently a list of Russian Radios was posted to this group.
I have been in communication with the sellers, with an interest to having
them find me Russian calculators and computers (see my page at
http://www.comcen.com.au/~adavie/slide/calculator/soviet.html). They
indicated that they were able to get just about any model that I wanted, so
I asked for the "top 4" - three of which had never been seen other than as
grainy photographs. Within a day or so, they responded that they have the
calculators I asked for. I have asked for more details - pictures -
photocopy - serial numbers - anything!! No response, yet. It will be great
if they really DO have what they say they have, but at this stage my scam
detectors are hooting really loudly. I'd advise anyone dealing with these
people to exercise caution. They may be genuine, but usually if something
looks too good to be true...
I'll keep the group informed, if there's any further developments.
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Willgruber <roblwill(a)usaor.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, December 24, 1998 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: Old Radios
I collect old radios, and I can definitely say differently. Just try
plugging in a metal-cabinet radio with a few bad tubes, turning it on,
and
touching the case. Also, get out of the way when a shelf collapses with
a
52-pound short-wave receiver on it. Other than that, you're probably
right.
--
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: Marty <Marty(a)itgonline.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, December 23, 1998 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: Old Radios
> Come now comrade Griffiths, an old radio never hurt anyone.
>
> Marty
>
>
>
<The bit is how would _you_ have done it in 1975 with the parts
<available then without knowing what would show up soon after.
Try more like 1977 for the apple controller. In 75 it was two or three
boards of TTL.
Allison
I have a Model 3 whose display has grown very dim. I also have the lead
on 4 Model 4's that I can get for a steal. I am hoping that the display
>from a Model 4 could be moved to my 3. Is this possible? Are they they
same? Thanks,
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Todd Osborne
Senior Software Engineer
FMStrategies, Inc.
http://www.fmstrategies.com/
--------------------------------------------------------
FMStrategies, Inc: tosborne(a)fmstrategies.com
Internet E-Mail: todd.osborne(a)barnstormer-software.com
--------------------------------------------------------
Founder of the Virtual Windows Class Library (C++)
http://www.barnstormer-software.com/vwcl/
--------------------------------------------------------
Anagrams? (http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/)
Can you figure out this one? Want the answer? E-Mail me.
COCO VERDI MOM (Hint: Think Late 1970's Computer)
--------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
2 Wrongs Don't Make a Right, But 3 Rights Make a Left!
--------------------------------------------------------