29 Dec
1998
29 Dec
'98
9:21 a.m.
Tim Hotze wrote:
I agree here, too. Windows 95 really won't like a
486/20. Sure, in
theory, it SHOULD boot, but your lifetime warranty on RAM might
expire before you get to see a Start button.
Win95 OSR1 runs fine on my 486 33MHz. Well, good enough to run the
occasional game of multi-player Doom at any rate. Now if only I could work
out how it managed to upgrade itself from an SX to a DX whilst I was
installing Win95 ;)
31 Dec
31 Dec
3:38 p.m.
Gareth Knight wrote:
Tim Hotze wrote:
I have Win98 running with 48mb ram on a Dell 4066/XE server and it runs great
and had an AMD 386DX-40 running Win 95 OSR1 running with 16mb ram until a
while ago, no speed problems.
As for the SX to DX thing, have you added a math coprocessor? I know when I
added a 487 to my wife's P70 portable that we chaged the 386DX-20 out with a
"Make It 486" processor it went from showing 486SX in MSD to a 486DX, probably
due to the presence of the FPU.
I agree here, too. Windows 95 really won't
like a 486/20. Sure, in
theory, it SHOULD boot, but your lifetime warranty on RAM might
expire before you get to see a Start button.
Win95 OSR1 runs fine on my 486 33MHz. Well, good enough to run the
occasional game of multi-player Doom at any rate. Now if only I could work
out how it managed to upgrade itself from an SX to a DX whilst I was
installing Win95 ;)
9255
days inactive
9257
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
gareth.knight2＠which.net -
rhblake＠bigfoot.com