> From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
> Umm, that post looked like a duck & quacked like a duck.... I don't
> _care_ if they said it wasn't a duck.
Yes, and this kind of duck really sucks.
When are we going to do something about this?
Hello?
Jay?
Glen
0/0
I have an IPC with HP UX 5.0 and HP Basic in ROM. The system has a built in
HP-IB connector as well as an HP-IB expansion card. The system boots fine
but I haven't had much success in getting the built-in floppy drive to read
the floppies I have prepared (using a wide variety of systems and techniques).
I am trying to use an external HP-IB dual floppy drive (an HP 9122D) but
the IPC refuses to admit that the 9122 is connected.
So, if anybody has tranferred images to a floppy, please let me know of
your technique. I have PCs running many OSs (from MSDOS 5.0 to Windows 2000
and OpenBSD, FreeBSD and Linux). I also have Sparcs with Solaris 7 and
OpenBSD.
On the subject of documentation. If anybody has manuals for this machine
please send me a note. If you don't want to part with them I can pay for
photocopies.
It is very frustrating to have the IPC just standing there when I *know*
I can get it to work.
Thanks
**vp
PS I suspect that the built-in floppy is double sided-double density,
but anybody knows block size, interleave etc. of these diskettes?
Does anyone have a manual for one of these? I bought one for $1 and now
I know why. The 5V PS was putting out about 20 volts! I've fixed the PS
and got the card talking to a terminal again after replacing about 6 ICs
but I'm not sure of some of the features on it so I can't test it completely.
Joe
> Andy Holt wrote:
>
>A _really_ fast paper tape reader was capable of 2000 cps ... but
needed
>special spooling arangements to feed the tape fast enough.
And one built during WW2 would run rings
around it (5000 char/second):
http://www.codesandciphers.org.uk/lorenz/rebuild.htm
>Very imptessive to watch when it was working properly ... and even
more
>impressive when it failed :-(
The Colossus one was (at least once) run to the
point that the tape failed - talk about paper cuts!!
Antonio
On March 9, Doc Shipley wrote:
> I dunno why y'all are so excited about them; I see them on eBay pretty
> frequently. As in:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2008371320
>
> Does this mean we should do a cooperative snatch? (DON'T go near
> there, Dave)
8-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
Have you checked MicroMint and the CCI archives? They're usually pretty
good. If you really have no luck, let me know and I'll do some digging; might
have some info.
mike
------------------Original Message---------------------
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:31:38 -0500
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
Subject: MicroMint BCC52 BASIC controller
Does anyone have a manual for one of these? I bought one for $1 and now
I know why. The 5V PS was putting out about 20 volts! I've fixed the PS
and got the card talking to a terminal again after replacing about 6 ICs
but I'm not sure of some of the features on it so I can't test it completely.
Joe
I have not been up in the storage area for over 10 years and I found
several items of interest up there;
1. AJ832 keyboard printer terminal operator's manual
2. IBM - Introduction to IBM Data Processing Systems C20-1684-2 a pretty
cool book.
3.IBM - Introduction to Virtual Storage in the System/370 GR20-4260-1
4. IBM - An Introduction to Linear Programming GE20-8171-0
5. Data Storage System 370 service
6. HP 9825 Desktop Computer Quick Reference
7. HP 9825A Desktop Computer Operating and Programming
7. A notebook with the 9825 Customer Course in it:
covers - introduction; mainframe; array variables; tape;strings;
advanced programming; general I/O; HP-IB;9872 Plotter;9885 Floppy Disk;
Matrix Rom.
Also found some old IBM clear/blue reel tape covers and a few punch
cards.
Not 10 years old yet but yesterday at the thrift I picked up a Compaq
Armada 7770DMT ( 233MHZ) laptop for $14.99. It was missing the
powercord and CD-ROM drive. I was able to find a cord today but cost
$20 at the second store I stopped at. I got it and so far the machines
seems to work fine. I'm waiting to see if it will hold a charge.
FWIW, all the PPT I have & have used is/was blank, and the perforators
punched the feed hole along with the data.
However, I also have some edge-punched cards, which use the same perfs
& readers as PPT, and these ARE pre-punched, presumably to avoid
long-term drift across cards. However, IIRC, the perforator does not punch
the feed hole when it senses a card instead of tape. So, technically no
problem either way, although re-punching an existing hole is not
usually a good idea.
For the curious, EPCs (not to be confused with the tiny 96 col cards which also have
binary round holes) are similar to 80 col TAB cards but are continuous, connected
with perforations at the ends and stacked accordion-style. They go through
the PPT perforator just like PPT, getting punched along the edge, and are
subsequently separated and used like other punched cards.
Sounds like you're embarking on an ambitious project; I think you'd need
some massive solenoids. The way it's usually done is to drive the punch pins
with a motor-driven cam and the solenoid interposers only select which pins are driven.
I've still got some punches & parts if you're interested; threw some of it out
since no one seemed interested (except Steve, who understandably
couldn't wait :), and it seemed like more hassle than it was worth, but I think
there's still some stuff in the pile that'll be a lot easier to work with than building
a perforator from scratch, either complete units or punch blocks/dies.
Mind you, if you enjoy that sort of challenge I wish you well!
And how about a reader (or two)?
mike
------------------------
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:36:13 -0600 (CST)
From: Bill Richman <bill_r(a)inebraska.com>
Subject: Blank Paper Tape Question
Does regular paper tape normally come with the sprocket holes pre-punched,
or does the device that punches the data holes also punch the sprocket
holes? I recently bought some "paper tape" from eBay, and it looks like
the right stuff except it's totally without holes. I don't think I've
ever seen "virgin" tape before, but I had the idea that the sprocket holes
down the middle came with the tape. I'm kicking around trying to build my
own tape punch, since I have been unsuccessful at scrounging or buying one
so far. I picked up some stainless steel flat and some rod of the
appropriate diameter for the holes today, along with some solenoids for
actuating said rods. I'm thinking of machining the stainless to make my
own punch, but the lack of sprocket holes on the new tape has me confused.
Do I need to add another solenoid and pin to punch a smaller hole for the
sprocket, or did I just buy some odd-ball tape?
I was looking through my DEC tapes to see what VAX, if any, were
there. I found most tapes clearly marked RISC, and none marked VAX.
I did find a couple tapes, early versions of Ultrix. They were not
marked as for VAX or otherwise, but were dated around 1987 or 1988.
So the question is when did the RISC series of processors come into
use, and are these 'unmarked' tapes likely for VAX?
TIA
Mike Thompson
As an example, I use to work on some navigational
transmitters with power output of a few hundred watts.
There was a test jack for sampling the RF output and you
hooked a scope to the jack. The gotcha was when you
hooked the coax cable to the transmitter first instead of
the scope. If you did that, the transmitter went down
within seconds.
This is rot! On a transmitter with even a few watts output the
RF probe coupling would be -10dB or more, so even an open
or short on this would give a return of -20dB. This is so
small it can be ignored, in fact many antenna systems aren't
that good.
As a termination a scope is a very poor match for any low Z
RF source it's impedance being 1Mohm or more so it
wouldn't matter if you plugged it in or not. Also most test
gear can't absorb any ammount of watts for any length of
time, so if the port was a high power snif it would have to be
terminated at the port with a high power attenuator which
gives a good match regardless of it's terminating Z.
The open circuit at the other end of the coax got
reflected back to the transmitter as a low
impedance and detuned it, and the monitoring circuits
would detect the detuning and pull the plug.
This depends entirely on the wavelength length of the
coax. Did you use an exact odd multiple of 1/4 wavelength
coax every time?
can you remember the make/model of these transmitters?
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Hello all!
I'd like to get in contact with anyone that has access to a DECstation
3100 with Ultrix. My problem is that I have a Cranfield DECstation which
was built to run in a NFS environment. I've rebuilt the network scripts
&c to get it to boot 'multiuser', but as it's missing the whole of /usr
and refuses to present me with a login prompt (good thing really - lack
of usr means I cannot change passwords anyway).
I would really appreciate it if you have a working copy you could
tarball /usr for me or point me towards somewhere with a publicly
accessible archive...?
TIA
Alex
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:36:13 -0600 (CST)
> From: Bill Richman <bill_r(a)inebraska.com>
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Blank Paper Tape Question
>
> Does regular paper tape normally come with the sprocket holes pre-punched,
> or does the device that punches the data holes also punch the sprocket
> holes? I recently bought some "paper tape" from eBay, and it looks like
> the right stuff except it's totally without holes. I don't think I've
> ever seen "virgin" tape before, but I had the idea that the sprocket holes
> down the middle came with the tape. I'm kicking around trying to build my
> own tape punch, since I have been unsuccessful at scrounging or buying one
> so far. I picked up some stainless steel flat and some rod of the
> appropriate diameter for the holes today, along with some solenoids for
> actuating said rods. I'm thinking of machining the stainless to make my
> own punch, but the lack of sprocket holes on the new tape has me confused.
> Do I need to add another solenoid and pin to punch a smaller hole for the
> sprocket, or did I just buy some odd-ball tape?
That's the way it is. The sprocket hole gets punched along with all
the data holes. Even the TTY33-ASR did it that way.
Otherwise you would have a tough alignment problem between the data and
the "timing track".
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu
An IBM 3840 Tape System just came in recently at Purdue University Salvage
and Surplus. The guy that works there (Don) said he would try and figure
out a price for it. The system includes:
1) 1x3840 A22 controller
2) 2x3840 B22 dual-tape drive
3) 1x3840 B22 dual-tape drive with autochanger.
The item was in 'unknown status', but appeared to be complete. I've asked
him to hold off on scrapping the system until at least next Tuesday. If
you're interested, contact me off list, and I'll try to see what he'll
want for it(you can make an offer for him). Currently, I don't have any
way to move it or store it (more than a couple days in my apartment that
is) so the pickup would either have to be by Tuesday by you or I'd have to
rent a truck to move it to my place for temporary storage (which I'd ask
$20+truck charges for).
If no-one's interested by next Tuesday, I'll tell him to go ahead and
scrap it, so make up your minds soon...
I'll post a price for it as soon as I find one out.
-- Pat
In a message dated 3/8/02 1:20:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com writes:
>
>
> What's an iPSC?
Isn't that the first intel Parallel Super? Computer. I think I still have
some cards for that, with multiple 82586 ethernet coprocessors on a Multibus
II card.
I have always wanted one of those. The closest I ever got was an empty tower
and bunches of cards, and that was 10 years ago.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
> > > M9047 Grant card
> >
> > What ever you do, don't let this card out of your sight.
>
> No kidding. I think I've seen three Qbus grant cards in my life.
What I find amusing is the stack of them I got out of a PDP-11 that was
controlling a Cameca Microprobe. They'd already disassmebled everything by
the time I got the stuff, but they must have had a blank card in every slot!
The interesting thing is they'd made they're own grant cards out of Q-Bus
prototyping cards!
Zane
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002; Julius Sridhar <vance(a)ikickass.org> wrote:
> Hi people. I have a Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 900u (nowhere near on-topic
> but I figure people here might know better what causes this kind of
> problem). If I provide it with a sync-on-green signal to its BNC
> connectors (It has five, I connect three), the monitor syncs up just fine,
> but all the areas that are black show up with a green cast. The white
> areas show up just fine. I haven't looked at an image with color yet, but
> I would guess that all the colors would probably be shifted towards the
> green. Any ideas?
I use to see this often during my tour as a television studio engineer.
It all came down to one word: TERMINATION. I had forgot to terminate
the video cables going into a monitor, or disconnected the monitor at
the end of a chain.
We all know to terminate the SCSI bus, and the other day there was a
discussion of terminating the floppy cable as part of Dave Jenner's
thread on multiple floppies. We also need to remember that any time
you run a signal down any wire from point A to point B, it needs to
be terminated in its characteristic impedance. If it isn't, some
bad things can happen. As an example, I use to work on some
navigational transmitters with power output of a few hundred watts.
There was a test jack for sampling the RF output and you hooked
a scope to the jack. The gotcha was when you hooked the coax cable to
the transmitter first instead of the scope. If you did that, the
transmitter went down within seconds. The open circuit at the other
end of the coax got reflected back to the transmitter as a low
impedance and detuned it, and the monitoring circuits would detect
the detuning and pull the plug.
On the back of my Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 20 there is a switch next
to each BNC, used to terminate each input. If the monitor does not
provide terminate switches, you can always try BNC T connectors
and 75 ohm terminators.
In a later message, Julius Sridhar <vance(a)ikickass.org> also wrote:
> Never mind. The Clamp pulse setting was in the wrong position.
I am curious to know if your monitor has termination switches. If
so, how about setting the clamp pulse back to what it was and then
terminating the inputs. If not, do you have the T's and terminators
to try it that way. I would be interested to know the results.
Mike
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002; Doc Shipley <doc(a)mdrconsult.com> scribbled:
> Just got home with my brand-spanking-old MVII...
All right now!
> It's indecently clean inside...
Don't you just hate it when that happens. You miss out on the fun
of blowing the dust out and having go everywhere.
> M9047 Grant card
What ever you do, don't let this card out of your sight.
I once rescued a good quantity of uVAX II boards. Most of them went
to list members, but what to do with the big stack of M9047's. One nearby
DEC reseller gave me the number of another reseller out in California
who was desperate for them. For a mess of M9047's, I got a some
DEC badged drives of the RZ2x variety. Who'd thunk it?
> Anybody have 2 breakout boxes for the M3107, and no M3107? We could
> equalize.... For that matter, if anybody needs the card, I'll just
> share.
When I finally got tired of all the uVAX II stuff around here, I sent it
to several list members for postage. It was the odds & ends stuff and
included some of the breakout boxes. So there are list members with
several of these in their stash. Just gotta get 'em to 'fess up.
Mike
I don't know about the other carriers, but I'm here to tell
you that RoadRunner (at least, it's incarnation here in Kansas)
really, truly, sucks ass:
1. They charge for basic cable in addition to my network
connection, even though I don't use the cable TV part.
2. ftp & http access to machines I have attached to the network
is *blocked* ( can get in via TELNET; whoop, whoop).
3. Their NNTP (net news) service sucks
4. They're going to raise my rates *again*.
5. The speed is no where nearly as fast as it used to be.
I'd go DSL but SBC doesn't have DSL in my neighborhood.
Damn.
Jeff
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:36:41 -0600 Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com>
writes:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Wright [mailto:dtwright@uiuc.edu]
>
> > I was just switched from @Home to my local cable company's
> (insight
> > communications) network, and it's actual been more stable and
> > reliable then it
> > was before. @Home kind of sucked, but I've been happy with
> > insight's service,
> > at least so far -- it's been about a month...
>
> Ok, so how much does Insight cost? Will they panic if I tell them I
> don't have windows, and no, it's not a Macintosh either? ;)
>
> Do they require you to buy cable service too, or can you get the
> network hookup separately?
>
> I have been considering switching to cable off and on, myself.
>
> Chris
>
> Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
> Amdocs - Champaign, IL
>
> /usr/bin/perl -e '
> print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
> '
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 18:10:00 -0600 (CST)
> From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: OpenSTEP for VMS
> In-Reply-To: <200203052244.g25Mii717665(a)shell1.aracnet.com>
> Sender: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > First I've heard of it. It primarily ran on NeXT hardware (of course), x86
> > systems, and had limited support for HP and Sparc. I've *never* heard VMS
> > mentioned as having any sort of an OPENSTEP environment.
>
> We are talking about OpenSTEP, right? Not NeXTSTEP? There has
> been a port of OpenSTEP to XFree86 for long and long.
You mean, of course, a port of NeXTstep to Intel x86 hardware.
Starting with NeXTstep 3.1 (circa 1991) and following with NeXTstep
3.2, 3.3. And OpenStep 4.1 and 4.2.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu
> The item referred to above is as follows:
>
> "In 1999, USC neurobiologist Joseph Miller asked NASA to check some old data
> the Viking probes had sent back from Mars in the mid-1970s. Miller wanted
to
> find out whether certain information on gas released by Martian soil, which
> at the time had been dismissed as meaningless "chemical activity," was
> actually evidence of microbial life. NASA found the tapes he requested, but
> they didn't find any way to read them. It turns out that the data, despite
> being only about 25 years old, was in a format NASA had long since
forgotten
> about. Or, as Miller puts it, "The programmers who knew it had died."
What this really meant was that some manager at NASA who
was in the position of responsibility for these tapes
didn't have the staff or budget to deal with them.
A purely political issue, and not a technical one at all.
I used be one of NASA's biggest supporters, and my dream was
to work there some day. Year by year, my opinion of them has
decayed until we get to how they dealt with the Delta Clipper.
I've read the reports, and I'm convinced they deliberately
crashed it because it was in comptetition for funds for their
pet project, the venturestar (X-33). Which is now dead because
they can't figure out how to make hydrogen tanks for the linear
aerospike engine (very cool technology from Project Sun in the
1950s) that won't leak...
-dq
p.s. Revive the Delta Clipper!
CMOS = Complex _Megalithic_ Object Structures
The builders of Stonehenge used CMOS, while the builders of Woodhenge (near
Stonehenge), and some possibly similar (in function) structures at Cahokia,
in East St. Louis, Illinois, used TTL. ;-)
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Franchuk [mailto:bfranchuk@jetnet.ab.ca]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:14 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Seen on RISKS-L
<snip>
BTW The Stonehenge circle is believed by some to be early calculator
( priest powered ) for calculating the major events of the seasons ,
stars ,
sun and moon cycles. Stonehenge era designers used a lot of
TTL ( timber^2 logic) rather than CMOS ( Complex Mon-Olithic Structures)
in the design.
--
Ben Franchuk - Dawn * 12/24 bit cpu *
www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html
Thanks, Bill!
Just got home with my brand-spanking-old MVII and set about playing
with it. It's indecently clean inside, cables all in good shape, fans
all free and clean, cards well seated.
I even managed to get them all back in properly, in order, and the
cables connected right.
So let me see if I got this right, as this is the first working QBus
system I've gotten:
Boards, in order:
M7606-AF MV-II CPU (KA630-A) w/1M RAM & serial console line
M7608-BP 4M RAM card for KA630
M7609-AH 8M parity RAM " "
M7504 DEQNA ethernet
M7546 TQK50 tape controller
M9047 Grant card
M8053 DMV11 Serial controller
M3104 DHV11 8-port async serial DMA mux
2x M3107 DHQ11 " " " " "
Storage:
2x RD53-A 70M Micropolis 1325
RD54 190M Maxtor XT-2190
TK50 95M CompacTape drive
This means I would, if I had the distribution hardware for the DHQ11s,
have 25 serial interfaces? (plus console) What exactly is the DMV11?
"Synchronous communications controller" sounds like it requires a DMV11
on the other end as well.
Everything VMS I've looked at says the DEQNA is unsupported in VMS
>v5.2. Is that unsupported as in "don't call DEC/Compaq/HP", or
unsupported as in "it don't work"? Am I stuck with NetBSD then? Does
anyone know if NBSD will mop-boot over the DEQNA? I don't have VMS
older than 6.2.
Anybody have 2 breakout boxes for the M3107, and no M3107? We could
equalize.... For that matter, if anybody needs the card, I'll just
share.
Oh yeah. It boots. VMS 5.2, but it's looking for the rest of a
cluster, and apparently a lot of its filespace was remote. Bummer.
Other than that, and the fact that I can't get it upstairs, it's a cool
"little" box.
You know you're over the edge when the lack of ethernet access in your
garage is a problem.
Doc
Thanks everyone.
The two Pros are claimed.
In the future there may be other hardware but, not alot.
I'm not getting out it's more a selection process as I
with to run more of the peices and that takes space.
Allison
> Subject: Re: OpenSTEP for VMS
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:44:44 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
> In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Christopher Smith" at Mar 05, 2002 04:33:20 PM
> Sender: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > I have heard that OpenSTEP ran on VMS (Alpha) at one point.
> >
> > Having never heard of, nor seen this, I am curious, and would
> > like to acquire a copy of this miraculous thing to run at home
> > (on a hopefully soon-to-be-had DEC 3000, using the VMS hobbyist
> > license...)
> >
> > Does anyone have any idea where to get it?
> >
> > Chris
>
> First I've heard of it. It primarily ran on NeXT hardware (of course), x86
> systems, and had limited support for HP and Sparc. I've *never* heard VMS
> mentioned as having any sort of an OPENSTEP environment.
There was a time when some Alpha AXP enthusiasts who, I believe, worked
for a European subsidiary of DEC, started to port NeXTstep to the Alpha
hardware. To us NeXT fans, this seemed too good to be true, and mostly
that's how it ended up. Unsupported, unloved, and unfinished.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu
From: Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com>
>
>That is more or less what I said, I think. :) I didn't mean that
>they didn't work at all, just that they'd had a lot of problems
>with them (so I hear), and replaced them because of it.
Actually the DEQNA was a burr in the VMS bottom since V4.2
or before. It wasn't a problem of getting 5.xx to work with it
but rather a matter of finally saying time to retire the turkey.
Likely 5.5 will work with it.
>Tried 5.5? I have that version, so it would be interesting to know.
Nope, dont have a copy. Did try 7.2 and it seems to work.
Allison
No problem; if someone else hasn't already fixed you (Rich & Ethan) up,
I can dig out the ROM images or (if I can't find the disks) recreate them.
Write me off-list and, if still required, what format (Intel/Mot/bin?).
Just to make sure yours are correctly installed, the last 2 digits of the ROM
specify the location, so the BASIC ROMs are R3225 & R3226 and
should be inserted in sockets Z25 & Z26 respectively (Cxxx & Bxxx address blocks).
And the monitor is in Z22&Z23 (R3222 & R3223), but sounds like it's OK.
As Tony mentions elsewhere the 2332's could be mask-programmed various ways,
and later model AIM65s had jumpers to select 2732/2532, but the AIM65 ROMs
are 2532 pinout; 2732's would need a couple of pins exchanged unless you have one
of the later AIMs (I assume yours is the 1K/4K version)..
At least two different types of keyboards were used, but nothing special about either.
I have a few brand new ones left if you need one (Don't worry, Jeff, one still has
your name on it :). Might also still have some manual sets as soon as I figure out
who's getting what, and several spare AIMs for parts.
mike
---------------------Original Message----------------------
>Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:41:02
From: "Rich Beaudry" <r_beaudry(a)hotmail.com>
Subject: AIM-65 Questions
Hello all,
I recently completed a trade for an AIM-65 that is about 80-90% working, but
needs a little TLC. Hopefully someone here can help....
It appears to have the BASIC ROMs installed, and in the right sockets, but
pressing "5" on the keyboard only results in the "<5>" display, and then the
AIM hangs up. Only a press of the Reset button will free it up. I suspect
the ROMs may be flaky, since one had quite a bit of (for lack of a better
word) gunk on the tops of the pins. I cleanied it all off, but there may be
some internal damage. These ROMs are part number 2332. I suspect these are
2732-compatible, at least in read mode, and not program mode... Does anyone
have a ROM dump in Hex format? If so, could you email it to me so I can
burn new ones?
Actually, while I'm at it, if anyone has ANY of the AIM-65 ROMs dumped in
Hex format, I'd appreciate copies. Then I could burn a whole new set...
Also, the keyboard needs cleaning pretty badly. Unfortunately, I do not
remember the manufacturer name or model #, but it is the standard AIM-65
keyboard. Has anyone ever fully taken one apart to clean it? If so, any
gotchas?
Thanks!
Rich B.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe [mailto:rigdonj@cfl.rr.com]
> Does anyone have a manual for one of these? I bought one
> for $1 and now
> I know why. The 5V PS was putting out about 20 volts! I've
Wow, they "upgraded" the power supply... that's a good deal ;)
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> Does anyone have documentation or software for the Intel iPSC/1, TI
> Explorer II or Symbolics 3620 that they'd be willing to share?
TI Explorer docs can be found at http://www.unlambda.com/lispm/explorer-docs/
As I mentioned a few weeks ago, he's trying to locate an original Explorer.
--
Check with Paul Pierce re iPSC/1's
I'm going to claim this is on topic since it's for my
SPARCStation2 which is 10 years old.
To make a (semi-)long story short, I've come to the
conclusion that I need a SCSI1 to SCSI3 adapter with
high byte termination to connect a wide IBM SCSI drive
to the narrow SCSI controller in my SS2. The only
IDC50M to MD68M adapter I've found doesn't have the
termination. There's a nice little adapter out there
but it's got female connectors on both ends. I could
try to assemble something with gender changers, but
I'm afraid I'd end up spending more than I did on
the drive for a Frankenstien that I'm not even sure
would work.
So my question is, does anyone know where to find an
adapter with male connectors? Or, for that matter,
has anyone dealt with this sort of thing and have
a better suggestion?
Thanks in advance,
Brian L. Stuart
>then took the extra time messing
>with the control marks along the edge.
>
>I don't know if the changed control marks had anything to do
>with it, but we never got the results back.
I've heard (but never been able to test), that if you rub chapstick, or
similar semi reflective goo, along the control lines of a ScanTron form,
that it can't track where to check for an answer. Supposedly if this is
done for exams (or similar right/wrong scoreing items), it will fail to
see any answers, and thus not consider any wrong, so it will think
everything is correct, giving you a perfect score.
Now, I openly believe that something like chapstick can keep it from
tracking where to look for an answer, but I find it harder to believe
that ScanTron has their systems set to assume everything is correct, and
only deduct those it finds wrong (seems like a setup like that would be
way to easy to bypass... so I would think they would assume a score of
Zero, and add up the right answers instead).
Anyone have a ScanTron system they can try it on.... I have always
wondered if it was true, or just one of those school age rumors.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Can anyone help this guy?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 11:38:36 -0800
From: John Kaur <digitg(a)flash.net>
To: vcf(a)vintage.org
Subject: cdc 9766 disk drive
Am looking for a cdc 9766 disk drive, removable pack, 300 mb, series #
is BK-7A1A in working condition. One I am running on my old pdp-11 has
spindle bearing problems. I live is Tucson, Arizona. Willing to pay,
but need soon. John Kaur, 520-622-1006.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
> > Too bad you didn't go to my high school, 1980-1982...
>
> I graduated in 1982.
Ah, same time frame I was working for the schools
(having graduated in 1975).
> We didn't have any fancy scanners for scoring tests, our
> teachers had to do that by hand. We did have a lot of the
> scanned tests for standardized testing and such, but of
> course those all were sent off for scoring.
Indiana has had a strong committment to education
during most of my life. We insitiuted a state-wide
system for tracking student progress in basic skills
beginning in 1980, and we did a good job, but failed
to pilot the system; if you think you know something
about what sysadmins call "lusers", imagine a group
of people who talk all day to 2nd graders then you
have to explain a command-driven interface to them...
...to make a long story short, basic skills testing
got bad press from teachers in Indiana, even before
the parents started getting a more accurate idea of
how their kids were actually performing.
-dq
> Anyone have a ScanTron system they can try it on.... I have always
> wondered if it was true, or just one of those school age rumors.
Thanks, Chris.... ScanTron was the small unit we had, and
now I remember writing a suite of code at RETS to drive
another one, this time, in BASIC and COBOL...
The big scanner we had was a NCS Sentry , but can't recall
the model number...
-dq
Well, I dug it out and brought it home. I am willing to part it out.
What I have is a 9845B with no monitor, interfaces, paper cover, Roms or Rom
Carts. It does have it's tape drives and a good keyboard
I am willing to sell or trade parts. I saved it mainly to see what it looks
like inside. I have wanted to take it apart for years.
I used to have several and kept this for parts. Now this is the only one I
have left, sniff.
Please contact me off list at
whoagiii(a)aol.com
I will ship parts internationally.
Thanks,
Paxton
Astoria, OR 97103
USA
> That reminds me of the time in High School when they had all
> of us in the 12th grade fill out this scanned form asking
> all sorts of information I didn't think they needed. The form
> was the type filled out with a #2 pencil and optically scanned.
> I filled mine out (more or less correct, leaving answers I
> didn't want to give blank), then took the extra time messing
> with the control marks along the edge.
>
> I don't know if the changed control marks had anything to do
> with it, but we never got the results back.
Too bad you didn't go to my high school, 1980-1982...
We had two such scanners- a little one that you fed a master
into that had "the answers" and then subsequently the student
answer forms, and it checked and marked them directly.
Then we had a monster that was also programmable, but wrote
out a 9-track tape that we'd load onto the Kennedy on the Prime...
but IIRC, we could not get it to deal with the multiple marks.
So I had to write a PL/I program that would always mark
wrong any question with multiple answers.
;)
> Christopher Smith wrote:
>
>> From: Doc Shipley [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
>> Everything VMS I've looked at says the DEQNA is unsupported in
VMS
>> >v5.2. Is that unsupported as in "don't call DEC/Compaq/HP", or
>> unsupported as in "it don't work"? Am I stuck with NetBSD then?
Does
>> anyone know if NBSD will mop-boot over the DEQNA? I don't have
VMS
>> older than 6.2.
>
>ISTR that's correct, and that's unsupported as in "We never could
get it
>to work right, so you're on your own..." The suggested solution
I've
>seen is to replace it with a DELQA board. :)
The warnings about "we'll soon de-support the DEQNA"
started in release notes round about 1987. It lasted
for at least another five years.
Ethernet drivers used to use an interface called FFI
- allegedly Flaming Fast Interface but that was presumably
just for management consumption :-)
Round about V5.4[-x] or V5.5[-x] this interface
was replaced with a new shinier one (whose
name I've either forgotten or never knew) and
at that point the DEQNA was stated to have stopped
working. I never actually tested this, but the DECnet
folks (in whose group I was working) told me
it just plain would not work - by design.
The DEQNA was DEC's first Qbus ethernet interface
and was IIRC basically a LANCE chip on a Qbus card,
the LANCE chip being essentially a DEUNA-in-a-chip.
The DEUNA was DEC's first ethernet interface.
The DELQA was the result of what they learned
from that experience. The Turbo-DELQA was a ROM
upgrade that improved performance further.
Antonio
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allison [mailto:ajp166@bellatlantic.net]
> >ISTR that's correct, and that's unsupported as in "We never
> could get it
> >to work right, so you're on your own..." The suggested
> solution I've
> >seen is to replace it with a DELQA board. :)
> Wrong! Unsupported means don't call if it don't work. It
That is more or less what I said, I think. :) I didn't mean that
they didn't work at all, just that they'd had a lot of problems
with them (so I hear), and replaced them because of it.
> does not mean
> it will not work. It does work and if the DEQNA is working
> as it should
> (some dont) with few problems. It was done to retire the DEQNA as a
> then very old design that was replaced by the better, lower
> cost DELQA.
> You can get away with a DEQNA as late as 5.4-4, I'm running one!
Tried 5.5? I have that version, so it would be interesting to know.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chad Fernandez [mailto:fernande@internet1.net]
> I have one friend that refers to me as owning a Univax.
If you own _one_ VAX, it may be more proper -- UniVAX, as
opposed to a VAXCluster. :)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
>
> Some detective work revealed the source of the errors.
> The dye used in the blue punch cards was slightly hygroscopic.
> The absorbed water made all the blue cards slightly longer than
> the rest, just long enough to throw off the reader.
>
Years ago, in the book "Steal this Book", Abbie Hoffman
suggested that anytime you end up with a punch card, in
order to be a troublemaker, soak the card in some solution
that, once the card is dried, has cause it to shrink
uniformly so that it will jam the reader.
As you can see, he wasn't much of a "fan" of "the system".
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric J. Korpela [mailto:korpela@ssl.berkeley.edu]
> Sent: 07 March 2002 18:24
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Seen on RISKS-L
>
> >The BBC's 1986 Domesday Project (a time capsule containing
> sound, images,
> >video and data defining life in Britain) is now unreadable.
> The data was
> >stored on 12-inch video discs that were only readable by the
> BBC Micro, of
> >which only a handful still exist. The time capsule contains
What horse crap (as we all know)! Typical bloody uk journalists who can't be
arsed to research a story properly. If they want to see if it's *really*
still unreadable give the disks to me and I'll use them in my own Domesday
machine, based on one of those *wow*r@re* BBC Micros.
Or do they mean the discs themselves aren't readable anymore, regardless of
whether you've got a Domesday machine or not?
a
>PS. Does anybody know of a source of datasheets (PDF) online for
the the
>really old chips like RTL,DTL,74Hxx,74Lxx? You still can find the
chips
>but not the data.
freetradezone is (effectively) gone now but
I guess they would have had all this stuff.
For TTL, I managed to get some CDs
direct from TI:
"Logic Selection Guide and Databook"
"Designer's Guide and Databook"
One or other of these has the TTL stuff.
I did this a few years ago when I went to
their website, found the technical literature
section, clicked on the ones I wanted
and filled in my employer's address.
CDs turned up in the post, free, about
two weeks later.
Same thing worked for the Intel Developer
CDs - these turned up quarterly for a while.
I cannot find the sign up section anymore so
I guess they've stopped (or they are somewhat
more selective ...!)
Motorola, Amtel, AMD and Cypress have
all sent CDs too.
It does save downloading and it certainly saves
a good deal of space on the shelves too!
Antonio
From: Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doc Shipley [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
>
>> Everything VMS I've looked at says the DEQNA is unsupported in VMS
>> >v5.2. Is that unsupported as in "don't call DEC/Compaq/HP", or
>> unsupported as in "it don't work"? Am I stuck with NetBSD then? Does
>> anyone know if NBSD will mop-boot over the DEQNA? I don't have VMS
>> older than 6.2.
>
>ISTR that's correct, and that's unsupported as in "We never could get it
>to work right, so you're on your own..." The suggested solution I've
>seen is to replace it with a DELQA board. :)
Wrong! Unsupported means don't call if it don't work. It does not mean
it will not work. It does work and if the DEQNA is working as it should
(some dont) with few problems. It was done to retire the DEQNA as a
then very old design that was replaced by the better, lower cost DELQA.
You can get away with a DEQNA as late as 5.4-4, I'm running one!
I was a digit then, and it was significant to my projects so I was in
the loop as it were.
Allison
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> > Years ago, in the book "Steal this Book", Abbie Hoffman
> > suggested that anytime you end up with a punch card, in
> > order to be a troublemaker, soak the card in some solution
> > that, once the card is dried, has cause it to shrink
> > uniformly so that it will jam the reader.
> > As you can see, he wasn't much of a "fan" of "the system".
>
> Why not just punch some extra holes in it?
> /* was quite useful with 360 JCL
Hmmm... that sounds familiar, he may have
suggested that as an alternative method,
using a razor blade... he'd have been
pretty clueless about a keypunch, I think
(although he started as a suit-and-tie guy).
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R. D. Davis [mailto:rdd@rddavis.org]
> Don't you mean a MultiVAX? :-) :-) :-)
Maybe the dual-cpu VAX-11 configuration could be considered a
MultiVAX?
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Dan Wright wrote:
>
> > how about this: whoever's giving away the equipment can do it in whatever
way
> > they damn well please? it's their stuff, after all... sheesh.
>
> Finally, some sense!
Agreed. We associate here my mutual choice, and we haven;t
chose to create a communal organizational structure (and
a commune simply won'y work with most groupings of people[0])
[0] ObCommFactoid: not slamming communes, but having lived
in one for nine months, I can tell you it takes a
special group of people to make it work, and we weren't
sufficiently special..
Interesting one here...
While composing a reply in Outlook 2001 (on a Mac OSX 10.1.2), I wrote
'PayPal'. Since I have the program check spelling before sending :-) it came
up and thought I meant to write 'payola' instead of PayPal. Think M$ is
trying to say something?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Sellam said:
>...governments want to try to control the
>content, for various political and social reasons (political dissent,
>porn, etc.) As we all know, try as they might, they won't be able to
>control it, ....
There is a scary article in last week's Weekly Standard that makes
this a more shaky proposition. Basically the contention in the article is
that the internet in China effectively *has* been placed under the control
of the Chinese government. The key technology there has been developed by
Cisco, AT&T, and other telecom giants given suitable financial inducement
by the chinese government, and as I understood the article, it involves
putting firewalls around the entire country, with enough power to sniff
packets for subversive terms to effectively render the internet unusable to
elements unfriendly to the government.
The article does hold out hope, based on cryptography, "pirate"
links from Hong Kong, etc.
Anyway, I'm not currently convinced that internet access is
currently synonomous with freedom of information exchange.
- Mark