Hi DEC Enthusiast's,
If I were to have to decide on just one model DEC PDP system to run in a DEC
Emulator, which one would be the most useful, versatile and has the most
software available for it?
I have only ever used a real PDP-8/e system way back in high school so I'm
not up to par on any other model of DEC PDP system and I only know BASIC on
the PDP-8/e so not much there either.
I hear a lot about the PDP-11. I found out that there were 16 major PDP
models at one time so I'm not too sure which one to pick.
I built Oscar Vermeulen's PiDP-8/I which I'm waiting on 1 part for. Other
than that project which is in a holding pattern at the moment, I have no
other PDP anything running in any form.
Back in the day when Bill Gates and company 1st started out, I had always
wondered how they developed their very 1st software program - Altair Basic.
I was pleasantly surprised one day when I saw a B/W photo of a young Bill
Gates bending over the operator at what looked like a very small computer.
Maybe it was just a terminal. I don't remember. I understand they did
software development on a DEC PDP of some sort.
Finding this out regenerated my interest in the DEC PDP line of computers.
I have many projects in the works already so I decided to setup a software
emulation of just one of the DEC PDP models. I have heard a lot about the
PDP-11 which if the information I read is correct was 16-bits. My PiDP-8/I
is 12 bits. I understand the PDP 10 was 36-bits and the PDP-15 was 18-bit.
The PDP-11 is the model I hear the most about.
I also have some experience on some version of a VAX when I was in the Air
Force so I'm thinking of getting a VAX emulation going at some point too.
So if I'm going to do this, what suggestions, pointers, experiences,
etcetera do you guys have for me. I am very interested in the DEC PDP
equipment though next to no experience so I have no basis to make a
decision. This is a serious request so I would definitely like to hear what
you all have to say. If you have read this far, thank you. Take care my
friends.
Kip Koon
computerdoc at sc.rr.comhttp://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/User:Computerdoc
Anybody want some Convex Computer Corporation manuals on microfiche. The
titles are:
- CONVEX C Guide
- CONVEX C Optimization Guide
- CONVEX FORTRAN User's Guide
- CONVEX FORTRAN Reference Manual
- CONVEX FORTRAN Optimization Guide
- CONVEX VECLIB User's Guide
- CONVEX LSQPACK User's Guide
Free to a good home or it will be plastic recycling
The last one that I received was October 20th.
Robert
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:27 PM, jim stephens via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Last one of those was a couple weeks ago. Then there were a bunch of backed
> up ones.
>
> List has been steady and in real time (from what I've seen).
> thanks
> Jim
>
>
> On 10/20/2017 11:30 AM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>>
>> Lately, I've received
>> message "belches"
>
>
On 10/19/2017 05:00 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 10/19/2017 06:44 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote:
>> My question for those knowledgeable with this drive is what's the
>> downside of adjusting the gain to create an output of, say, 7V P-P?
>>
>>
> Well, you might have to turn it back down for newly recorded tapes. But,
> if you are using it only for recovery of old data, maybe no downside at
> all.
>
> But, there are so many defects in old tapes.? There's print-through,
> wrinkles from the tape pack scrunching, weave, oxide flaking, dirt
> buildup, and maybe some others.
No, it turns out the answer is to set the preamp gain at spec. It
appears to do nothing but create more problems if turned up higher than
that.
It was worth a try.
--Chuck
I have a couple of hard disks I want to make dd copies of. I have Ultrix
running on my DECstation 5000/240 with the disk I want to clone attached to
it. The trouble is that I don't have enough disk space on the machine to
clone the disk and then grab the image using FTP. I have been trying to find
a way to pipe the dd output over the network to a SIMH Ultrix machine that
has plenty of disk space. I tried piping dd into rcp, but rcp doesn't seem
to take input from standard input. I have looked at cpio, but that too
appears not to accept input from standard input.
Unix is not my strong point. Are there any other ways I could pipe the dd
output across the network to a machine that has enough disk space?
Thanks
Rob
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Sean Conner via cctalk wrote:
By gum! Alpine does indeed translate the 'A' into a '?' and I never
noticed. It seems that my tiny mind simply translated the character
and moved on.
> I have:
>
> LANG=en_US.UTF-8
> LC_COLLATE=C
>
> as part of my environment, and I'm using a font that supports UTF-8...
And how does one know that a font supports UTF-8?
And yes UTF-8 has been around for decades but as an English speaker I didn't
have to think about unicode and locale and stuff like that.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV : "...underneath those tuques we wear,
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : our heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 21:41:53 -0500 (EST)
> From: ethan at 757.org
> Subject: Re: Could someone make this topic go away?
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511192141030.32673 at users.757.org>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Am I the only one left using Pine!?
>
> I get odd looks when I'm checking email from my cell phone.
No you are not.
I use (al)pine on my OpenVMS system here as well as my main Linux host. I
have mail going back to 2004 here and since 1996 at another public access
Unix host I use. It's great when I'm out of town and can ssh in from my
phone and check the mail. :) Pine does most everything I need without
having to worry about malware, phishing, etc ... the beauty of text.
Fred
I'm going to put it on my list of projects to create a CPU card for my Microtutor that uses the 1802 instead I think.? I can get some blue PCB stock.? As far as I understand the 1802 is fully backward compatible.
Maybe the 1801s will show up on day.? I've found all kinds of chips I was told were impossible to locate.
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Steven Feinsmith <steven.feinsmith at gmail.com>
Date: 2017-10-20 7:32 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: Brad H <vintagecomputer at bettercomputing.net>, "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: CDP1801
RCA 1801 disappeared from face of Earth forever... You would be better off to purchase at:
http://www.sunrise-ev.com/membershipcard.htm to use 1802. The 1802 was very successful microprocessor that replaced 1801 because it required to have a pair of chips to work together. I believe I saw 1801 was more than 30 years ago.
Good luck!
Steven
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Brad H via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
Hi there,
I just purchased an RCA Microtutor minus the rather important CPU card.? I
can recreate the card but I expect locating the 1801 chips will be
difficult.? I am just posting this in various forums in case anyone has any
leads on where I might find either the complete card or the required chips
to make a replacement.? I'm wondering what, if any devices were built with
the 1801 that I might be able to scrounge from.
Thanks again,
B
Steve,
I don't think I qualify to receive the whole shebang, nor would I have
room, but I will gladly take any box(es) un-tested / for parts / etc. C-64
hardware that you would care to offer.
I endeavor to repair CBM machines, primarily C-64s and peripherals, and I
am basically out of parts. I have almost a dozen machines stacked up that
can't run for want of various parts...
I'm in St. Paul, MN, and unable to work due to total disability (stage 5
kidney disease. among other things).
Best,
Bill Layer
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Digital Aeon via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> After many years of collecting, Im tired of moving it all
>
> So ive picked out 4 or 5 systems that mean alot to me. And i want to
> pass the rest of the collection onto someone starting out in the hobby that
> wouldnt otherwise have the funds to get some of the stuff I have.
>
> So if there is anyone out there starting out and wants what I have I will
> gladly hand it over to them free of charge. I would like to see this go
> to someone who doesn't have anything.
>
>
> I have apple, commodore, sun, x86 you name it I got it. about 4
> truckloads full if not more.
>
> Im located in Mid Michigan
>
> Steve
>
The list has been quite for 24 hours for me, so sorry if this is a
duplicate!
The sources for the the latest version of PC-MOS/386 are up on github.
Antonio
--
Antonio Carlini
arcarlini at iee.org
On 10/20/2017 6:46 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk wrote:
> On 10/19/17, 6:22 PM, "cctalk on behalf of Douglas Taylor via cctalk"
> <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org on behalf of cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Is there a potential problem here?
>>
>> I have an 11/53 microPDP11 with a RQZX1 controller connected to a single
>> DEC DSP3043 drive (535MB) and a single RX33 floppy.
>>
>> The autoconfigure setup in the RQZX1 puts the hard disk at DU0 and the
>> Floppy as DU1. OK. I boot RT11 from the disk, V5.7. Works fine.
>>
>> I would like to use some of the extra space on the disk by setting up
>> RT11 disk partitions.
>>
>> However, one of the partitions is DU1, but that is what the Floppy is
>> called. How do I stay away from what seems like a conflict?
>>
>> Doug
> SET DU2: UNIT=0,PART=1
> SET DU3: UNIT=0,PART=2
> ...
>
> ** reboot **
>
> INIT DU2:
> INIT DU3:
> ...
>
>
Thanks, it did work. I'll just stay away from DU1:.? I forgot about the
reboot required for these changes to take effect.
Steve,
I don't think I qualify to receive the whole shebang, nor would I have
room, but I will gladly take any box(es) un-tested / for parts / etc. C-64
hardware that you would care to offer.
I endeavor to repair CBM machines, primarily C-64s and I am basically out
of parts. I have 8-10 machin
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Digital Aeon via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> After many years of collecting, Im tired of moving it all
>
> So ive picked out 4 or 5 systems that mean alot to me. And i want to
> pass the rest of the collection onto someone starting out in the hobby that
> wouldnt otherwise have the funds to get some of the stuff I have.
>
> So if there is anyone out there starting out and wants what I have I will
> gladly hand it over to them free of charge. I would like to see this go
> to someone who doesn't have anything.
>
>
> I have apple, commodore, sun, x86 you name it I got it. about 4
> truckloads full if not more.
>
> Im located in Mid Michigan
>
> Steve
>
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 03:36:00PM -0700, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
> While it?s still in need of a major update, the DEC Emulation
> website now has a new home. It?s now on my server, and
> realistically I should have moved it years ago.
>
> http://www.avanthar.com/healyzh/decemulation/decemu.html
Cool, thank you.
> Believe it or not, I am planning to update the pages in the near
> future, who knows, I might even modernize them a little. When I
> started them, one of the design goals was that they be readable with
> Lynx. I?m not sure how important that is anymore. :-)
I have browsed it just few moments ago with lynx, emacs-w3 and my new
textual favourite, elinks (it multitabs!! and shows tables!! and I could
play with configuration a lot, so on 256-colors-enabled term it looks
a bit nicer to my eyes). In all them, and in some old graphical one,
the site looks decently.
As of "modernisation"... You know, just MHO and stuff but sometimes
when I see modern pages it seems like their creators have had been
abducted to some sect and brainwashed clean. I have 1600x1200 and I
like to have some other window besides browser (say, an editor, like
emacs). So I open such page, and the browser has about 3/5 of estate
and I am not going fullscreen, no way. And there is huge menu on the
left side, so I can choose. And there is some (expletive0) "top bar",
all white and empty, or maybe with page title (I already have one
(expletive0) title on a title bar of browser window), then there is
(expletive0) bottom bar, all empty. And for a text, there is area left
which is about five to ten (expletive0) lines high. There is no
(expletive0) way to make those (expletive0) elements go the (subseq
(expletive0) 0 4) away. The last resort is to turn styles off, which
quite often gives me almost the view that I would like to have, plus
(quite often) a parade of (expletive0) leftovers from the leftside
menu, which after switch takes more than 90% of (expletive0) web
page. I swear I do not make this up. The usable part of the modern
webpage is on average the (expletive0) ten percent, as measured by
scrollbar - and sometimes even less.
The only reason I keep using very old Opera 1x.x is because it:
A) does not multithread (so when I load heavily crapped page, it only
(subseq (expletive0) 0 4)s with one core of my cpu max, rather then
(expletive0) with me fulltime
B) is able to show very decently a page with styles turned off; this
also sometimes means lowering core usage by half (the usage which is
there even when (expletive0) browser is expected to sit on its
(expletive1) and do nothing).
C) I turned a lot of CSS off by default, but I am not quite sure if
this really works (software, trust, does not compute) - and I put
fixed/monotype fonts wherever I can see them, because I love the idea
that space is same width as "i" and "W". So all the job done to max my
pleasure with downloadable fonts is lost, and (expletive0) good for me.
I have tried switching to Firefox, but somehow having eighty tabs does
not work very nicely there, for me at least. But I launch it when
there is something that poor Op cannot render properly. Overally, I
have few browsers opened as day goes by, one for Common Lisp docs,
another for casual reading, one for sci articles heavy with equations
and gfx (mostly up-to date rendering 'gine), few text browsers for
interesting stuff, books or longer reads etc. I have recently started
to experiment with Dillo - this is very nice piece of (expletive2),
recommended to everybody even if it not always shows things, kind of
like text browser with graphics (sometimes) and multitabs. Perhaps
will also try "old new" Mosaic - the old one got lost during
innumerable system upgrades.
As I could have observed, plenty of people out there think that
"modern" means "optimised for mobile", but what does it mean in
practise? The text, i.e. useful part of the page might take 10
kilobytes (optimist, me, always), there might be even useful pictures
on it, and then there goes a (expletive2)load of javascript. Megabyte
is a, kind of, norm. So, this (expletive2) eats my download/upload
quota, for which I pay (in theory, because I never was in such
position). And then it starts running and eats from my battery, which
can be loaded for peanuts, but who wants to recharge every few hours -
this is supposed to give me mobility, but not to/from wallsocket.
Which is how I came to brainwashing - the words being used are
redefined. Optimised no longer means what it used to mean. Now it just
means conformance to some group's standard. Optimised for pats in a
back, just not from enduser (some endusers dream of packing boot deep
into webdevel's (expletive1) and leaving it there, and the second boot
would go to their halfbrained tasteless boss'es (expletive1), only
deeper).
For me, "optimised for mobile" is something like HTML1.0, or maybe
even 3.0 (if this is when tables were defined). And "modern" is
unimportant, if a goal is information retrieval. If you (or anybody)
plan to upgrade your webpage, please consider doing it like XIX
century guy, just barely after computer lessons. Text is
everything. Because this is how information is being
transmitted. Pictures are few, and if they are there, there must be a
purpose (like, they too convey some information somehow related to
text).
So this is my opinion on modern web design, and mind you, I am not
using it on a cell phone, but on something as big as two A4 pages, and
the (expletive0) web cannot do very well on such (expletive0) huge
area, or significant part of it. What are "they" using for making
their creations - a monitor wall? I cannot imagine my state of mind if
I started to depend on a cellphone for web reading, but I guess a
dictionary of expletives could get few new words. There is no day
without cursing the web here, despite all the heavy measures I took to
protect myself from poor (i.e. modern) design. Well, maybe I curse the
web only every other day, plus every time the page almost loads except
one small element (perhaps some JS dependence, and server is
down/restarting so I wait minutes because reloading only makes things
worse in this case - but perhaps this is my ISP's fault, but then ISP
is part of it, too).
As of Javascript - sure there is a place for it. I dream of writing a
compiler in Javascript. A few have been written. Ok, maybe I do not
dream so much to learn Javascript. But the whole "page is an app" is
just misunderstanding in best case, or more probably, some kind of
crime - crime against reason, for example.
This was meant to be short(er), but got long(er). Blame the web.
--
Regards,
Tomasz Rola
--
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home **
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... **
** **
** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_rola at bigfoot.com **
Hey Kevin.
This is all good advice, but there is also another way to go - and it's a
bit more future-proof. For about the same cost as the Zoom floppy, you can
get a device called an SD2IEC or similar. It's very simple - it connects to
the IEC (disk drive) port on the C-64 and accepts a micro or mini SD card.
This way you only need copy your C-64 titles to SD card (any way you like)
and they will be accessible to the C-64. The device behaves like a 1541 /
1571 drive.
I say the SD2IEC is future proof, as it doesn't rely on original 15X1 disk
drives or 5-1/2" media, all of which could go away someday.
Now _personally_ I use a home-built XM1541 cable with opencbm (free/OSS) to
transfer my images to genuine 5-1.4" disk. I only do this as I'm too cheap
/ broke to buy something else like the SD2IEC. It is exceptionally stable
and reliable - once set up, it "just works". Though if you a) run Linux and
b) accept a kernel update you will need to c) recompile & re-install
opencbm as the module is built specific to the running kernel. This takes
only seconds, literally.
-Bill
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Robert via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> I recently bought a ZoomFloppy from here: http://store.go4retro.com/
> zoomfloppy/
>
> I got the version with an IEEE488 conector, for use with a PET, but it
> also supports the serial interface used on the C64.
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> >> There are some online repositories of C64 software. Having only a little
> >> knowledge when it comes to C64_s how do I get a C64 disk
> >> image onto a 5 1/4_ floppy?
> >
> > I use a ZoomFloppy and a real 1541 (actually a 1571). These devices are
> > available from many places; Jim Brain built mine, or you can look for any
> > xu1541 or xum1541-type device and use OpenCBM to copy that floppy.
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------ personal:
> http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
> > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
> ckaiser at floodgap.com
> > -- BOND THEME NOW PLAYING: "Moonraker" ------------------------------
> ----------
>
NOPE NOT A BIG RTE PERSON - BUT YES THERE WOULD BE MULTI SERIAL
BOARDS IN SOME INCOMING PROCESSORS
RAN IT ONCE AND PLAYED WITH IT...
BROKE 1000 SYSTEMS DOWN AND SOLD THE PIECES. THE ONLY SYSTEMS THAT WE
SUPPORTED SOFTWARE WISE WERE F AND THEN ACCESS
THIS 21 WHATEVER IS THE SKINNY ONE! DOUBLE SIDED KEY - AND IF I
REMEMBER WILL YANK IT UP OFF THE FLOOR IN MY OFFICE TOMORROW AND SEE THE #
BUT SUSPECT 2108 AS
ABOUT ALL I REMEMBER LIKING ABOUT IT WAS IT HAD THE BOOT BUILT IN
,GRIN!.
WHAT I DID NOT LIKE WAS IT WAS NOT CORE MEMORY.
SURE WERE FUN TIMES...
ALTHOUGH THERE WAS ALWAYS A FOND SPOT FOR THE 21XX STUFF... I GOT
REALLY OCCUPIED WITH THE 3000 AS A COMPUTER THAT I WOULD REALLY USE. IN THE
EARLY DAYS OF RUNNING THE ACCESS THOUGH WHAT GREAT FUN AND THE
100 BOARD BBS/MULTI USER CHAT/VOTE AND POL/EMAIL AND MOST GAMES WE DID
GOT MOVED TO THE 3000.
ED - WHOSE KEYBOARD THINKS IT IS AN ASR 35 TELETYPE SO THAT IS HOW THE
REST OF THE MESSAGE GOT FININSHED
In a message dated 10/20/2017 7:37:48 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwest at classiccmp.org writes:
Ed wrote...
------
HP 21mx/whatever processor works with double sided key... (I forgot
model#)
------
Given the way you phrased it, the correct replacement for 'whatever' is M
series. E and F never used the double sided key.
However, even that is not entirely correct. Older M's used the double sided
key. Later M's used the single sided key that is the same as the E and F.
And....
-------
It has ... of all things 3 tty boards in it? what is with that? Multi
user without a mux?
-------
Didn't you sell and support these things in a prior life? It was always far
more common to see the 21MX machines with 'discrete' tty boards rather than
muxes. There were only two mux boards, the one in 2000/Access which was
very
uncommon as far as 21mx's go... and the one that RTE commonly used which
was
also not super common to find in the wild. If you had a mux board, then I
would have been a bit surprised. Multiple tty boards? Not surprised, that
was the far more common thing.... more often than not, the 21mx's weren't
really used/targeted for multiuser (except 2000 TSB of course). RTE did
multiuser well, but... still was probably most often used in situations
that
really didn't require it. Mux's weren't super common.
And....
--------
Has 2 memory boards think I remember 64k total.
--------
64kb or 64kw? Remember, the M.E.M. option is required to support more than
32kw. On the M, MEM was optional. I believe it was standard on E & F.
And...
-------
need to find a paper tape basic to play with.
-------
There are plenty of those floating around. Google is your friend... I think
MU-BASIC may have been the one I heard people using? See below for a better
option....
And...
------
Any other advice?
------
You should probably start by reading an introduction to the 21MX to get
some
basic background on the machines...
Go to: http://www.hpmuseum.net/exhibit.php?hwdoc=108
You should start with 02108-90004 followed by 02108-90002
Finally - for you (and anyone else) that has just a cpu or a cpu and
minimal
peripherals, the best thing you can use to play with the machine is Terry
Newtons HP-IPL/OS.
See http://www.infionline.net/~wtnewton/oldcomp/hp2100/ and
http://newton.freehostia.com/net/hpiplos.html
Yes, you can run BASIC like you mention above. But it is a very well done
"Forth-like" system that is well developed/flushedout. So in addition to
BASIC, you get oh-so-many-wonderful-things. I very highly recommend that
anyone messing with 21mx/1000 systems take a good look at HP-IPL/OS.
Best,
J
RCA 1801 disappeared from face of Earth forever... You would be better off
to purchase at:
http://www.sunrise-ev.com/membershipcard.htm to use 1802. The 1802 was very
successful microprocessor that replaced 1801 because it required to have a
pair of chips to work together. I believe I saw 1801 was more than 30 years
ago.
Good luck!
Steven
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Brad H via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> I just purchased an RCA Microtutor minus the rather important CPU card. I
> can recreate the card but I expect locating the 1801 chips will be
> difficult. I am just posting this in various forums in case anyone has any
> leads on where I might find either the complete card or the required chips
> to make a replacement. I'm wondering what, if any devices were built with
> the 1801 that I might be able to scrounge from.
>
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
>
> B
>
>
I have a bus backplane here, very similar to an S100 backplane but the 2x50 connectors use .1 in spacing instead of .125 and the supply voltages are regulated +5 and +/- 12V.
I also have the power supply; what are they from?
TIA,
m
I was looking at an old GI catalog and casually noting the CP1610 that was most of a PDP11 processor. I did some more web surfing and noticed that the Intellivision game machine used this chip. It just never dawned on me that they used this processor.
I see that one could even get a keyboard for these.
Dwight
Hello,
Does anyone have a setup to image RL02 packs to a pc file that can be mounted with simh? I have a couple of dozen I would like transferred because I am downsizing. I have a bunch of gear I can trade, also rum and/or dollars. Hopefully you are close to Houston.
Sincerely,
John Welch
Spring cleaning time!
I have three vintage HP 9836 computers, two monochrome monitors, one
color monitor and three printers.
I'm sure they are going to need work to get running. No testing has been
done. Could probably get two out
of the three working. Somewhere I have a few various I/O cards also that
will be included.
Photos can be seen here: http://anifur.com/clist/
Pickup in Santa Cruz, CA, I just don't have time to (or the back) to
pack and ship, though I can help load.
-Bob
--
Vintage computers and electronics
www.dvq.comwww.tekmuseum.comwww.decmuseum.org
That's a starting bid at 20,000 euros?
-------- Original message --------From: St?phane Tsacas via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 5/30/17 5:56 PM (GMT-06:00)Subject: Micral N (1974) for sale
If it happens you're in Tours (in France, https://goo.gl/maps/BXNZ4YJixYq)
June 11 2017, a Micral N from 1974 will be auctioned.
More info -- in French -- on the auction house website
https://www.rouillac.com/fr/news-1252-le_micral_n_premier_micro_ordinateur
Starting price : 20 K?.
Good luck ;-)
--
??phane tsacas
I have a couple of the Corona and Cordata desktops. Apparently Corona
Data Systems was forced to change their name when the manufacturer of
Corona typewriters objected. So yes, Corona did predate the Cordata
computer.
My first PC clone was the PPC-400, and I still have the service manual
(copy.)
Marvin
> From: Sam O'nella <barythrin at gmail.com>
>
> I have a similar but think mine says cordata which i guess yours is an early model? Is there no model number or serial or was that edited out? Just curious. ?If you post on vcfed.org some younger collectors will find the historical significance interesting of a potential unauthorized IBM compatible. I find those companies that were sued out of existence or folded easily an interesting time in an aggressive young home computer market.?
> -------- Original message --------From: Bob Rosenbloom via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 5/27/17 10:38 PM (GMT-06:00) To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Corona Data Systems PC available
> More spring cleaning. This time it's a Corona Data Systems PC.
> Kinda like an old Compaq unit. Has floppy and hard disk, but does not
> boot up.
>
> Pickup in Santa Cruz, CA
>
> http://anifur.com/clist/corona1.JPG
>
> http://anifur.com/clist/corona2.JPG
>
> http://anifur.com/clist/corona3.JPG
I have a similar but think mine says cordata which i guess yours is an early model? Is there no model number or serial or was that edited out? Just curious. ?If you post on vcfed.org some younger collectors will find the historical significance interesting of a potential unauthorized IBM compatible. I find those companies that were sued out of existence or folded easily an interesting time in an aggressive young home computer market.?
-------- Original message --------From: Bob Rosenbloom via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> Date: 5/27/17 10:38 PM (GMT-06:00) To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Subject: Corona Data Systems PC available
More spring cleaning. This time it's a Corona Data Systems PC.
Kinda like an old Compaq unit. Has floppy and hard disk, but does not
boot up.
Pickup in Santa Cruz, CA
http://anifur.com/clist/corona1.JPGhttp://anifur.com/clist/corona2.JPGhttp://anifur.com/clist/corona3.JPG
Did you get an actual Firefly (research) board, or a prduction VAXstation
3520/3540 board? I don't think you're likely to find schematics or pinouts
for either, but it's not impossible to find 3520/3540 stuff, while I've
never before heard of anyone encountering any actual Firefly boards in the
wild.
Back in the 80's I had some archive disks (maybe SIG/M or CPM/UG or maybe
something else?) which had files on the disk named like ZOSO.022 (for disk
#22) which was the Star Trek basic game disk. I'm attaching below the text
>from that file (best viewed with a monospace font). I seem to recall this
person who went by the moniker of Zoso had written others as well, but I
can't find them right now.
Just curious if any of you had seen those and if anyone knows who this
mysterious Zoso person was? If I find others I'll post them.
Regards,
Amardeep AC9MF
* * * * *
THIS DISK CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING FILES:
STARTREK.TXT THIS IS THE ORIGINAL SOURCE FILE FROM WHICH THIS PACKAGE WAS
DEVELOPED. IT IS PURPORTED TO RUN AS IS WITH MITS 8K BASIC. IT
CONTAINS ALL THE REMARKS, AUTHOR CREDITS ETC. IF YOU HAVE THIS
BASIC WITH ASCII-LOAD CAPABILITY, TRY IT !!
BIGTREK.ASC THIS IS THE RESULT OF HAVING TRIED TO TRIM THE ABOVE SOURCE SO
AS TO GET IT TO RUN (IN A 64K SYSTEM) WITH MICROSOFT'S MBASIC.
IT PRESENTLY IS ALMOST SHORT ENOUGH, BUT NOT QUITE. BECAUSE OF
THIS, THE OBJECTIVE BECAME TO MAKE IT SUITABLE FOR TDL'S DISK
BASIC RUNNING IN 64K. IT RUNS QUITE NICELY THAT WAY. ALL OF THE
FEATURES OF THE ABOVE PROGRAM ARE RETAINED, AND A COUPLE OF NEW
ONES HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED.
BIGTREK.BAS THIS IS THE COMPACTED MACHINE CODE OF THE ABOVE FILE WHICH
LOADS ABOUT 50 TIMES FASTER THAN THE ASCII VERSION (TDL DISK
BASIC ONLY). THE PROPER STEPS TO LOAD THIS ARE AS FOLLOWS :
(ASSUME YOU HAVE LOADED TDL BASIC INTO A 64K SYSTEM)...
1 - OPEN#1,"I","BIGTREK.BAS" <CR>
2 - LOAD "B" <CR>
3 - CLOSE#1,"I" <CR>
4 - RUN <CR>
TREKINFO.DOC A BRIEF TUTORIAL ON THE RULES FOR PLAYING THIS, CROSS-REFER-
ENCED WHERE POSSIBLE WITH THE FAMILIAR COMMANDS OF THE MORE
COMMONLY AVAILABLE 'STARTREKS'.
TREKMOD.ASC SEE EXPLANATION (IN POST-SCRIPT).
STRTRK/2.ASC THIS IS INCLUDED BECAUSE I LIKE THE 'COMMUNICATIONS' AND 'MIS-
SION-PROGRESS-REPORTS' THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN THIS MUCH
SMALLER (STILL > 20K) VERSION.
NO MATTER HOW YOU GO WITH THIS, IT IS LIKELY THAT YOU WILL NEED 64K (PERHAPS
60K IF YOU USE 8K BASIC) TO RUN IT AT ALL. ONLY GUARANTEE IS THAT IT WILL
RUN
WITH TDL DISK BASIC/64K AS IS.
SINCE I CAN RUN THIS, I LEAVE IT TO SOMEONE ELSE TO GET IT WORKING WITH
EITHER
MICROSOFT DISK BASIC (OR BASIC-E). ONE SUGGESTION FOR THE FORMER PROJECT
MIGHT
BE TO PARTITION THIS PROGRAM INTO TWO MODULES. THE FIRST WOULD CONTAIN ALL
OF
THE LINES RELATING TO GALAXY INITIALIZATION, DIMENSIONING STATEMENTS, DATA-
TABLES AND ALL BEGINNING OF GAME DIALOGUE - IN OTHER WORDS, LINES NOT REFER-
ENCED AFTER GAME IS IN PROGRESS. THIS FILE MIGHT BE CALLED 'STARMOD1.ASC'.
THE
OTHER MODULE, 'STARMOD2.ASC' WOULD CONTAIN EVERYTHING ELSE. THE LAST COMMAND
(TO BASIC) IN 'STARMOD1.ASC' WOULD BE: MERGE"STARMOD2.ASC". BOTH MODULES
WOULD
HAVE TO BE RENUMBERED IN SUCH A WAY THAT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 'MERGE',
EACH
NEW LINE OF 'STARMOD2' WOULD WIPE OUT A LINE OF 'STARMOD1' WHICH HAD THE
SAME
LINE NUMBER (UNTIL EVERY LINE OF FIRST MODULE WAS OVERWRITTEN BY A NEW LINE
>FROM SECOND MODULE). ONE CHANGE WOULD BE NECESSITATED IN THE SECOND MODULE:
IF
A PLAYER REPLIED 'Y' TO THE QUESTION, 'ANOTHER GAME ?' A BRANCH WOULD NEED
TO
BE MADE TO A LINE WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMAND, - RUN "STARMOD1.ASC". THIS
SOL-
UTION IS A BIT 'KLUGEY', BUT PERHAPS PREFERABLE TO FURTHER TRIMMING. SEE THE
'P.S.' BELOW; THE MICROSOFT MANUAL IMPLYS (BY NO PROHIBITION) THE LIKELIHOOD
OF SUCH (ABOVE-MENTIONED) ARTIFICES BEING EFFECTIVE. THE DISAPPOINTMENT THAT
MR. DOGGE ENCOUNTERED SHOULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO HONEST EXPERIMENTATION
COMBINED
WITH (THE TYPICALLY) INADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION.
HAVE FUN !!! - ZOSO
LATE NOTE: THE EXPERIMENT WITH MERGING TWO OR MORE MODULES HAS BEEN TRIED.
I
AM SAD TO REPORT THAT THIS APPROACH APPARENTLY DOES NOT WORK. IT SEEMS THAT
THE EFFECT OF THE 'MERGE' FUNCTION IS TO DESTROY DATA (IN ADDITION TO
CERTAIN
LINE NUMBERS). MY THANKS TO MR. E. DOGGE FOR THIS INFO. E.D. ALSO SENT A
'TRIM-
JOB' OF 'BIGTREK' CALLED 'TREKMOD'; IT PLAYS THE SAME GAME, BUT LACKS THE
'SCO-
RING' AND 'VISUAL' FUNCTIONS. NOT TO DEMEAN MR. DOGGE'S EFFORT, I CAN'T PER-
SONALLY SEE HOW THIS PARTICULAR 'STARTREK' CAN BE MEANINGFUL WITHOUT THE
SCO-
RING ROUTINE. IF THIS WERE MY 'BABY', I WOULD (IF NECESSARY) REDUCE EVERY
BIT
OF (TEXTUAL) CONSOLE OUTPUT TO A 2 DIGIT CODE SO AS TO RETAIN 'SCORING'; THE
'VISUALS' ARE CUTE BUT NON-ESSENTIAL. SEE WHAT YOU THINK. ALSO !!! THERE ARE
(IN THE 'BIGTREK' FILES ONLY) SOME CRUCIAL ERROR TRAPS WHICH I INSERTED.
LOOK
FOR THESE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 'NAVIGATE' AND 'IMPULSE' SUBROUTINES. THE
COMMON STARTREK PRACTISE OF INPUTTING A '0' WARP-FACTOR (DISTANCE) TO ABORT
AN IMPROPERLY ENTERED NAVIGATION ROUTINE WILL, WITHOUT THESE TRAPS, GIVE YOU
A 'SUBSCRIPT OUT OF BOUNDS' ERROR, AND THE GAME WILL HAVE BEEN (LITERALLY)
LOST. I SUGGEST COPYING THESE EXACTLY IF YOU WILL BE TRYING THE 'TREKMOD'
IM-
PLEMENTATION.
Hi everyone,
I am very interested in DEC stuff and I would love a PDP11 to play with
and have in my (small) collection. If anyone has one in the UK that they
would be interested in selling, please contact me off list. I'm
interested in both Q-bus and Unibus models.
Pretty unlikely but I thought I'd ask.
Thanks!
--
Aaron Jackson
PhD Student, Computer Vision Laboratory, Uni of Nottingham
http://aaronsplace.co.uk/
Al struck a memory cell I haven't used in at least a quarter century. No, I do not know who
The Mysterious Zoso actually was but he was legendary. His flaming just barely crosses the
line into early trench industry journalism I guess. Certainly not the shine of Charlie Matco
or Ted Dziuba, but maybe the first step in that direction?
>From CPMUG 21:
BITCH, BITCH, BITCH !!! SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST INCAPABLE OF BEING CONTENT. NO
SOONER THAN I HAD FINISHED MY REPLY TO ALL OF THE TTY PEOPLE (VOLUME 13.21),
TONY INFORMED ME THAT SOME VDM OWNERS HAD TROUBLE READING MY 80 CHARACTER
LINES ON THEIR QUAINT I/O DEVICES. I WILL NOT ACCOMODATE YOU, AND HERE'S WHY:
I PAID GOOD BUCKS FOR THE TOOLS I USE, AND I CHOOSE TO USE THEM. FRANKLY, I
CAN'T FATHOM WHY ANYONE WOULD ADMIT TO OWNING ONE OF THOSE THINGS AT ALL. I'VE
SEEN WHAT YOU GUYS ARE UP TO: THOSE HORRID, NARROW LITTLE PROGRAMS WRITTEN IN
PROCESSOR TECHNOLOGY'S 5K BASIC (YOU KNOW THE ONES WITH A LINE FOR EVERY SINGLE
LITTLE THING - 15 DECWRITER PAGES JUST TO PRINT YOUR VERSION OF WUMPUS [ABOUT
WHICH I SHALL BE HEARD FROM LATER]). YOU GUYS HAVE EXPOSED YOURSELVES TO CAT-
ARACTS AND MYOPIA BY LOOKING AT YOUR VDM'ED TVS. LEAVE ME OUT OF IT !!! THE
COMPANY WHO SUPPLIED THOSE B & W CRAYON BOXES TO YOU IS A PLACE TO SUSPECT...
SEMI-KITS, 8K BASIC THAT WILL BE READY IN 1976 AND ENOUGH ADVERTISING TO EN-
SURE YOU WILL HAVE PAID TOO MUCH FOR YOUR 'SOL'; ANOTHER MITS I THINK...
ZOSO
The following would like to find new homes: Not ESPECIALLY interested
in boxing/shipping (the docs would be easy, and would love to see them
preserved for posterity).
BOXED SunOS 4.0 doc set with 4.0.1 update
2 lg , 1 medium, 2 small boxes
Also have SunOS 4.1.2 install manual
Sun Hardware (specs from stickers, not validated)
2 SPARCstation IPC
2 SPARCstation IPX (1 w/ PowerUp 80Mhz CPU, which stopped working?)
any all of the above may have bad power supplies
2 SPARCstation LX (one marked 32MB, no floppy)
1 SPARCstation Classic (no floppy)
3 SPARCstation 10 (10/30 w/ 16MB, 10/41 w/ 80MB, 10/41 w/ 64MB)
1 SPARCstation 4 (bad P/S)
1 SPARCstation 5
SUN QIC (150?) drive in box
SCSI CD-ROM in enclosure
Many 50 pin SCSI cables
AT&T "UNIX PC" (7300?) w/ mobo, monitor, keyboard & mouse
No hard drive. The owner got bored when the grounding on the
HD started making noise. I think he yanked the 68000 chip,
and perhaps others.
Another eBait wonder:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/182597510806
The listing says "Local pick-up only", and it's in Denver, Colorado. Someone
should really save this (although the chances of finding all the boards to go
with it is pretty slim).
Noel
> From: Warner Losh
> Will it fit in a pickup truck?
Should fit into most 4-wheeled transport devices (except a new Ford GT, those
supposedly only have 2 cubic feet or so of storage :-).
Noel
> From: Paul Koning
> For some definition of "standard". ... other machines of that time or earlier
> numbered bits according to the power of 2 they represent, i.e., the "current
> standard".
Well, the vast majority of computers 'back then' numbered bits (and byes)
>from left to right - which is why in numbers in TCP and IP, the bytes go from
left to right (necessitating byte swaps on most current architectures before
sending a packet out into the network).
The majority of computers being attached to the network when TCP/IP was being
defined used that byte order (I think PDP-11's were the only exception, but
I'm too lazy to check a copy of HOSTS.TXT to make sure), and so that's what
we're stuck with now.
So, I can see, centuries in the future, the bytes in a word on the Internet
(and it _is_ capitalized) still being in an order set by long-dead computers.
Kind of like how rail gauge today still mimics the width of Roman carts (yes,
I know the story is only half-true, but it's not wholly wrong).
Noel
Against my better judgement, I obtained a DEC SRC Firefly dual processor
card. If i read this* correctly, then this card is interfaced to the
shared memory bus (MBUS) as opposed to the QBUS (the card uses a Q bus
format).
I realize it's probably hopeless, but I'll ask anyway: Are there any
schematics or specifications on the connectors anywhere?
*IEEE Computer, also available on Bitsavers as a technical report.
We need to find a source of the pin feed paper for the 43! Also a
great thing to round out the display would be to have the aux. tape reader
punch that was marketed for it- non working is ok visually - working
would be a wonderful thing!
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 5/24/2017 8:26:28 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Jim Brain via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org
> wrote:
> On 5/23/2017 1:07 AM, dave.g4ugm at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> You probably need a null modem cable.
>>
> I had one (and used it), but not all null modem cables are evidently the
> same :-) I soldered up a loopback as you suggested, and the unit dropped
> into DATA MODE on startup. I then played with the signals. The unit
> really does want DCD to be active, as just doing CTS/RTS, DTR/DSR, and
> RX/TX did not do the trick. Evidently, my null modem cable I had tested
> with previously does not connect DCD. Swapped out for a null modem
adapter
> (from our old now deceased friend Radio Shack) and the unit works with a
> new Dell M4800 laptop (so "newer" style +-10V RS232 levels must be OK.
>
The minimum legit voltage swing for RS-232 is supposed to be plus and minus
5 volts and the
maximum allowed voltage swing is plus and minus 25 volts. The problems
occur when gear didn't
bother to do the negative swing to minus 5 volts. Plus and Minus 10 volts
is more than adequate.
The printer ribbon has less life left in it than I anticipated, but a list
> member is helping me, so it should be good to go after a deep cleaning
and
> a light oiling. I did notice the printhead starts to stutter at times on
> long lines, but I *think* it's a function of the damage to the ribbon, so
> we'll troubleshoot that only if it continues after ribbon fixes.
>
The ribbon on my 43 is a reinking type. The ribbon loop is maybe 18
inches? I have a new in bag
ribbon which I am sure is also dried out. I used a drop of thin oil on the
reinking roller the last time
I messed with it and that seemed to work. You probably want to use
something that will lubricate
because the pins on the dot matrix print heads do need that to keep them
>from rusting and wearing
out.
The "stutter" you mention is normal. The printer electronics buffers a few
characters during the slow
carriage return and prints slightly faster than 30cps so when a new line is
started it goes at full speed
until the buffer is empty at which point it goes into the stutter mode.
This eliminated the need to send
nulls after a carriage return that was necessary on the earlier purely
mechanical printers.
--
Doug Ingraham
PDP-8 SN 1175
If there's anyone out there with a rack-mount DEC AlphaServer 2100A - the
one with the underslung pair of power supplies -- I'd appreciate your help
in determining the 15-pin control-cable configuration for J3. It may
require examining the other end of the "power supply control cable assembly"
P#17-04014-01, which is 24-pin (to handle the dual/redundant power supply
configuration).
Available hardware documentation is pretty sparse. Physical examination of
an AlphaServer 2100A system backplane (54-24129-01) would certainly help!
While I'm pretty sure that I've figured out the +5V +- sense lines (pins
3-4), and the +3.3V +- sense lines (pins 15-14), I've failed to determine
the purpose of other control lines - most particularly which one(s) turn it
on. Pins 10 is suspect, but there's no obvious reference point for voltage
measurement or evidence whether it should be shorted to another pin, or .
something else.
There's no control relay or other obvious mechanism. The PCB is
dense-packed with surface-mount components on one side and power components
on the other; tracing circuits is a bear.
Applying AC starts up the 24VDC fans, but none of the four switchers kick in
:-<.
Thanks for any clues!
paul
I have long had an interest in server tech and "technology with character" I finally took the plunge and got a DEC and I am looking for something of a similar vintage to connect it to.
I have read about VAXstations, z80 based mainframes. This seems like the kind of devices I would like to acquire and learn the workings of.
I also require a keyboard for my DEC terminal.
As this is my first post to the list, I am mostly looking for resources (UK would be preferable)
-- H
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Here's the page for now for your perusal - the temporary URL is subject to change.
http://oldcomputers.net/some-collectors.html
There's a submit button in the upper right, but it just emails me.
The entry field in the upper left is kind of fun - enter a valid address or location, select it from the drop-down box, and it takes you there. It also gives GPS coordinates.
This is a very cool COSMAC VIP that has been slightly modded to act as a
front-end processor for an SC/MP II processor board with a custom-built
front panel for the SC/MP as well as some interesting add-ons for the VIP
(PROM programmer, Tiny BASIC ROM card, CDP1855 math co-processor) and more.
Full description and links to photos here:
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?58035-RCA-COSMAC-VIP-with-SC-MP-I…
I also produced a video to show off the setup for historical purposes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BozGSTumwXc
Thanks!
Sellam
Hello,
I tried to clone a boot drive ( on a bigger one ), using one of the scripts on nekochan.
The disk was initialized , labelled
Then formatted by the script, and cloned. The data is present if I mount it
The issue starts when I change the id and try to boot from it... this is what I get
esf read error, bad count
esf read error, bad count
no file system found for "unix".
unable to execute dksc(0,1,0)unix: media not loaded
autoboot failed
dksc(0,1,0)unix: media not loaded
>From Prom, ls gives :
dksc(0,1,8)/:
sgilabel sash symmon
esf read error, bad count
no file system found for "/".
Any suggestion is accepted.
Alessandro
Hello!
I recently received a HP9816 machine. The previous owner originally got the
machine without a keyboard but subsequently sourced a keyboard off ebay.
Unfortunately this keyboard was not in the best shape. One key was stuck
and when taking it apart it was evident that it has taken a bath for quite
some time. At least the electronics around the space bar were quite
affected with corrosion. Luckily this keyboard is quite simple design with
only CMOS 4XXX IC, and better yet, Tony Duell has already reverse
engineered it (together with the rest of this little machine). Thanks a lot
Tony!
But the stuck key appeared to be cause by the "plunger" (is that the
correct english word?) is slightly cracked in the corner. When the keytop
is inserted it is not sliding very well.
I have not found a method of repairing it so I am asking the community if
there are anyone that has spare "plungers" for the HP9816 keyboard.
http://i.imgur.com/q5aRQnC.jpg?1http://i.imgur.com/67xWZ8q.jpg?1http://i.imgur.com/cGWCKFw.jpg?1
This is the keyboard at the hpmuseum.net page:
http://www.hpmuseum.net/images/200serieskeyboardsmall-35.jpg
/Mattis
So I had a random thought in the wee hours this morning and I leave it
to you, the cctalk braintrust, to tell me exactly how stupid this idea is:
I have a VAX-11/750, an Able QNiverter (UNIBUS->Qbus adapter), a 22-bit
Qbus backplane, and a VCB02 (QDSS) 4-bit graphics boardset.
Theory: With an appropriately modified NetBSD driver for the VCB02, such
that it provides only 18-bit addresses to the VCB02's DMA engine, I can
get X running on the VCB02 on the 11/750.
That is, the configuration is: 11/750->Unibus->QNiverter->Qbus->VCB02.
Obviously the console functionality of the VCB02 won't work since that
requires support on the VAX side of things that won't be present, but I
think everything else should work. I've browsed the technical manual
and I don't see anything that should get in the way, I'll just need to
hack up the driver appropriately.
But this is something that randomly popped into my head (I was inspired
by a research paper, "A VAX Based Data Acquisition Computer System at
the Nuclear Structure Research Laboratory" wherein a Matrox QRGB Qbus
graphics board was lashed to an 11/750 in a similar manner...
What say you all?
- Josh
My flatmate has one of these. Just the small subassembly with the 2
push-buttons and a red light between them. Is this something that
would be of interest to anyone? I'm trying to persuade him to eBay it
instead of throwing it away.
We've also got the plastic covers from a few disk packs, an empty
metal chassis and a few other odds and sods. Sadly most of the machine
was binned long long ago. :-(
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R/WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal: +420 702 829 053
Hi,
will join a group buy, need caps for 2 drives ..
With best regards
Gerhard
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] Im Auftrag von
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
Gesendet: Montag, 06. M?rz 2017 19:00
An: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Betreff: cctalk Digest, Vol 33, Issue 6
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Oh boyee:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/112414315290
I thought the M variants all had blank front panels and bootstraps, but
this has all the pretty stuff!
How difficult are those switchers to fix for one trained in EE, but better
at debugging logic?
=]
--
Anders Nelson
+1 (517) 775-6129
www.erogear.com