> From: Paul Koning
> Here's what it looked like
Not having RT11, I embedded this in a small stand-alone program (which took a
little work, Unix assembler being rather different :-), so I could see it (it
wasn't obvious from the code what it did).
Pretty clever, to get that complex a pattern out of so few instructions.
Although the self-modifying code is, err.... (If anyone wants the source or
.LDA, let me know, I can post/upload it.)
On the Unix machine we had at MIT, I 'stole' a light pattern I'd seen
somewhere else (not the code, just the visuals). The code is considerably
longer, but I didn't try to bit-push it, just wrote something very
straightforward to produce that pattern.
Noel
I have been able to sysgen an RT-11 XM monitor with the idle loop light pattern enabled, and install and boot it on my PDP-11/45. Here?s a video of the idle lights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycADKwgnLpE
I built the latest simh and tu58em from source on my MacBook, then was able to do the sysgen under simh, copy the resulting binaries onto a TU58 image using simh?s TDC device, then use tu58em to copy the binaries over onto my working RT-11 4.00 distribution RK05 pack.
It was pretty fun to get all this working ? I had never seen RT-11's console light pattern before!
?FritzM.
On 12/23/2017 07:24 PM, Chris Elmquist wrote:
> I?m not sure you can smell the difference between failed selenium rectifiers and lutefisk...
It probably doesn't get interesting until you toss in a can of
surstr?mming...
--Chuck
pretty neat... what format material was it stored on!?
Ed#
In a message dated 12/27/2017 6:03:28 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk at classiccmp.org writes:
Hi,
I don?t know if I missed the announcement on this list but I just saw this
article:
https://9to5mac.com/2017/12/27/apple-lisa-source-code-to-be-released/
It features quotes from our own Al Kassow. ;-) Way to go Al!!!
TTFN - Guy
On 12/03/2017 10:00 AM, Tony Duell wrote:
> That sounds like the original version with the separate logic module.
>
> I think the display is the same between the 2 versions. I am also
> pretty sure the same display is used in all the old Voyagers (there
> are annunciators on it that are not used on some models, but they
> are still there on the display of that model). AFAIK the difference
> between the models is the firmware.
Please forgive the delayed response--for some reason, the CCTalk server
belched up a bunch of messages dating from 30 November onward today.
I've read a bit on the HPMuseum forums that indicate that early displays
aren't interchangeable with later ones--the later ones apparently use a
finer-pitch connector.
My own HP 16C has a serial number beginning with 2228A..., which I
believe puts its date of manufacture in 1982, so my fingers are crossed
to see if the "old" HP12C that I picked up on eBay is even close in
terms of display connections.
--Chuck
Has anyone tried to build tumble on Ubuntu 16?? I've used the libtiff,
libpbm and the like that are included in the current system as
installed, and there are problems now with the tumble_pbm.c code
parameters (line 237 specifically).
I had built up and saved a build with my own downloaded and built
libtiff and libpbm, but those packages won't build anymore either.
Hoping not to rathole Al maybe Eric?? someone else who is using it to
convert tiff to pdfs.? I've scanned some stuff and would prefer to use
the full bitsavers toolchain, as well as have notes on how to build
going forward.
I'll flail on it more if noone is interested, but spent enough times
tonight trying to build it before asking.
thanks
Jim
> From: Mattis Lind
> Unfortunately I am not having any lutfisk this year. The rest of the
> family is not very fond of it.
I"m glad to see there are _some_ non-crazy people there! :-)
Anway, I can way top that - the tradition Bermudian Christmas dish is cassava
pie: make that wrong (starting with raw cassava root), and it will _kill_
you! :-)
(Cassava root contains a cyanide precursor. That's what cassava root is
banned for human consumption in Japan. Somewhat ironic, the land of 'fugu'
banning it! :-)
Noel
On Fri, 12/15/17, Ethan Dicks via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:49 PM, systems_glitch <systems.glitch at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's on my list of things to do -- you can run external clock into DL11 and
> > DLV11-J style connectors, and IM6402 UARTs are supposed to go up to 2 mbit,
> > so somewhere between 38400 and 2 mbit should be possible.
>
> A side-effect of modding the DLV11J could be high-speed TU58 emulation...
The LSI-11 I had at last spring's VCFs did that with a little home-brew
6809 board I was using for TU58 emulation. I wasn't going into a
DLV11 per se, but into an MXV11.
I'd have to go back and look at the details to see how fast it was actually
running. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I had to back off a little
bit on what the hardware could do because something on the software
side couldn't take it that fast.
BLS
Hello,
while I can confirm that the bigger black with two pins is a diode, I'm not
sure what kind of diode it is, as it could be bipolar, Schottky or Zener.
About the smaller black components with three pins, they could be
transistor or diodes (single or double, with common cathode, common anode
or series).
I will try to find a correspondence for the markings, but symbols are
someone strange, so a clear macro picture would be better...
Andrea
I am continuing work to reverse engineer the schematic for my H7826 PSU. I
have removed one of the daughter cards in order to draw its schematic, but I
can't identify some of the surface mount components on it. I have posted a
picture of it here:
https://rjarratt.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/50-19530.jpg
The ones I can't identify are:
1. The component with two wide pins that looks like an IC
approximately in the middle of the board. It is marked M106 (or it might be
AA106) and 91813 underneath. I think it may be a resistor, but I am not
sure.
2. Just to the right of this is another much thinner two-pin component
which is black on top with a kind of white notch. I have no idea at all what
this is.
3. The three 3-pin black components to the left of the first
component. Two of them are marked "2T L" (or is that "ZT L"?), one appears
to be marked "2X I" (letter "ih", not letter "el"). I guess they are
transistors, but they may not be of course, and I don't know their pinout.
Any help with identifying what these are would be very helpful.
Thanks
Rob
I have started to work on a getting VT50 terminal back to life. When
digging into it I recognze quite immediately that someone had done a brain
transplant on it. It has VT52 boards in it!
Was this a usual procedure?
The VT50 to VT52 shift looks like a failure of DEC at the time. So close in
time. But different board sets inside. They could have designed a board
with RAM upgrade possibility and just a new microprogram? Looks strange to
me. When the VT52 got on the market I guess it was hard to sell any VT50s
or was there a substantial price difference?
Anyhow, the VT52 boards are dead. They generate the proper sync signals but
there are no keyclick generated when pressing keys on the keyboard. Which
is quite normal since the sync is generated by a chain of counters while
the keyboard is controlled by the microprogram. The terminal uses 4 pieces
of 256 by 4 bipolar PROMs for a total of 512 bytes of microprogram.
Has anyone dumped the contents of these so I could verify them?
Hello again, Folks!
I came across a pretty amazing find in my stuff that I didn't even know I
had and have no recollection from where I got them. It's a box of unbuilt
S-100 board kits. Some of the kits are complete (board, parts,
documentation), others might be missing the documentation or components.
And then I have a bunch of bare boards, including a fair number of
prototyping boards.
I created an unboxing video, which can be watched here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gGgX3WPK34
Complete information including links to photos and pricing can be found
here on my new dedicated S-100 sales thread on the VCFed forums:
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?61192-Sellam-s-S-100-Hardware-Sof…
Scroll down to the third post for the newly posted S-100 kits.
Please inquire directly to me via e-mail for fastest results.
Thanks!
Sellam
> From: Bill Gunshannon
> At best, it's a third part QBUS box.
I assume that was 'third party'?
No, that's a real DEC front panel. They could have put that on an off-brand
chassis, but I would _guess_ not.
(The outer housing I can see looks like the slide-in ones DEC used to hold
the BA11-N/BA11-S, but I don't recall what the housing for the BA11-M's
looked like.)
For some reason the BA11-M's seem to have been going for more than the
BA11-N's. Dunno why, maybe the original LSI-11's have some sort of appeal?
Noel
Discovered a Z-World "Tiny Giant" SBC220D development board. Seems to
work; if powered on, the LED blinks. Its a Zilog Z180 board--and I can't
remember a thing about it other than playing with it a bit.
Yours for shipping (it's about 5x6") and should fit in a USPS small FRB.
------------------
While I'm at it, any interest in Neoware thin clients? I've got a few;
they're set up for CF card as hard disk, but most have 5GB microdrives
installed.
How about 3-button serial mice?
Cheers,
Chuck
> From: Josh Dersch
> the plastic "ball on post" brackets
PS: Apparently the 'official' DEC name for the 'ball on post' plastic brackets
is "latch molding". Not very descriptive/apt, alas.
Noel
There is a CPU board for sale on ebay, M8189, and it has the usual 3
chips CPU, MMU, FPU.? However, there are 2 extra chips and I've never
seen that before.
Anyone know what this is?
Ebay item 122867114663? - Vintage Mint Digital DEC M8189 CPU Module
Board KDF11-B
Doug
> From: Josh Dersch
> See the pictures at the below link: ...
> Hope this is the right assembly for you
Yes, those are _exactly_ what we're looking for. Thanks very much for
taking the time to take those!
Noel
So, Dave and I are getting to the point where we're about to start mounting up
our indicator panels, but we're not sure what some of the mechanical details
(below) are.
Could someone who has one please take a look and let us know (or, even better,
send us photos)?
It appears that the bezel and inlay mount to the rack with the same kind of
'ball on post' (BoP) mounting things used for blank panels.
What we can't quite make out is how the Belenex light shield, and the circuit
board with the bulbs on it, mount to the rack. I suspect it's totally
independent from the mounting of the BoP mounting devices for the bezel/inlay,
but....
The one mechanical drawing we have (RF11 engineering drawings, pg. 186) does
have cross-sections, which confirm the board is mounted to the Benelex on
stand-offs, and that the Benelex is somehow thrust up into the bezel, but
exactly how the Benelex is mounted is not clear to me. The mention of a "Mtg
Bkt Benelex" suggests that's mounted to the rack with brackets, but...
Help!? Thanks (hopefully :-)!
Noel
Hi all --
I'm attempting to resurrect a MicroVAX I (because it's there, that's why)
and the CPU appears to have developed a fault. Microverify passes at
powerup, but I can't get VMS to boot (it dies with a SYSBOOT-F-Unexpected
Machine Check almost immediately). Also tried Ultrix and it dies shortly
after enumerating disks. I know the memory and disk controllers are fine,
and there's nothing else in the system at the moment, so unless anyone has
any bright ideas, I think I'm going to need to debug the CPU.
I'm trying to track down the diagnostics for this machine, no luck so far.
Anyone have a copy sitting around somewhere? I believe there were two RX50
floppies for this purpose, DEC part numbers BL-T856A-DE and BL-T857A-DE.
Thanks as always,
Josh
Hi Folks,
We've got a Canadian customer with what appears to be an IBM 3480
cartridge that he'd like to get the data from. We don't get nearly
enough request for these IBM carts to make owning a unit a viable
proposition.
I understand that the 3480 format was supported by a wide range of
vendors, including DEC with the TKZ60/TKZ61.
Anyone having one of these drive want to make some easy money?
FWIW, the customer thinks that it's a lot older than it really is--he
thinks this dates to the 1970s and the S/360, so some gentle advice may
also be required.
If you're interested, drop me a private email and I'll hook you up.
Cheers,
Chuck
> From: Guy Sotomayor Jr
> I *really* want them and I'm within an hour (usually) of where they
> are. The problem is that right now I'm on a business trip until the end
> of the month and he needs this gone prior to 12/31.
Why don't you reach out to the person and tell them you _really_ want them,
maybe they'll be able to let it go until you get back?
Or is there someone in the Sacramanto area who can pick them up and hold them
until Guy can get them? I would offer to, but I'm on the wrong coast.... :-(
Noel
I am reverse engineering the schematic for the input stage of my H7862 PSU.
I have come across a KBU6J bridge rectifier which seems to be connected only
to the two middle pins, which are the AC inputs. I can't see any other
connections. Before I desolder it to verify there are no connections I can't
see, does this make any sense?
Thanks
Rob
I have a suspicion that this component may be faulty on the input side of my
H7826 PSU. A little tester I have does not recognise it, it is possible that
the currents it uses are too low for this particular triac, but I am not
sure.
There are new ones on ebay, but I am not sure if I can trust ebay sellers to
have genuine parts. So I would like to identify a suitable replacement. I
have found a few suggestions for replacements, but looking at the datasheets
many seem to have a lower peak gate power then the BT139. I am not sure what
the critical parameters are, so I don't know how to choose a replacement.
Can anyone suggest a good replacement for this part?
Thanks
Rob
Now that I have my RX02 drive working I have started to take a look at
the RL02 drives again. I hooked a scope up to the sector transducer and
sector timing test points, and they look nicely aligned. So I moved on.
Then I hooked up the scope to the TP1, TP2 and the sector timing TP and
compared it to the output in the RL02 tech manual. S1 was fine but S2
was offset in the wrong direction (probably need to see page 3-8 in the
manual to understand). I had a look at where the heads are connected to
at up was connected to down and down was connected to up.
Without understanding the consequences I switched these and loaded a
pack. Unfortunately I heard a horrible sound and I now have a thin black
ring on the bottom side of my platter, which I am very upset about. :( I
unloaded very quickly but I think the damage is done.
Why would the heads be installed this way? and why did it destroy my
platter when they are connected "correctly"?
Does anyone understand what might have happened?
Thanks, and sorry for destroying a pack :(
Aaron.
It is time to ask for help.? I have forgotton more than I ever knew
about using RSX.? Anyway, using the wonderful PDP11GUI I have imaged an
RL02 pack to my PC.? I have downloaded a running RSX11m image.
I want to look at my imaged disk to see how it looks. Using SIMH I did
the following commands:
============================================
PDP-11 simulator V3.8-2 (JH stdio telnet)
sim> set cpu 11/93, 4M
Disabling CR
Disabling RK
Disabling HK
Disabling TM
sim> set cpu idle
sim> set rq0 rd54
sim> attach rq0 rsx11mplus_4_6_bl87.dsk
sim> set rl0 rl02
sim> attach rl0 RSX11-bu.rl02
sim> b rl0
SAV -- SOFTWARE CONFIGURED FOR ENABLE HARDWARE WHICH DOES NOT RESPOND.?
HALTED.
HALT instruction, PC: 126272 (BR 126270)
sim>
============================================
So then I try:
============================================
sim> b rq0
RSX-11M-PLUS V4.6? BL87?? 2044.KW? System:"RSXMPL"
>RED DU:=SY:
>RED DU:=LB:
>RED DU:=SP:
>MOU DU0:"RSX11MPBL87"
>@DU:[1,2]STARTUP
>;????????????????????? PLEASE NOTE
>
....
>QUE BAP0:/AS:BATCH
>@ <EOF>
>
===============================================
I think that I should be something like use pip to do something like :
pip [*,*]* /li or something, but I got into trouble real quick.
Do I need to mount the RL02 for the system to see it?
If I want to list the files on the RL02 image what command would I use?
Any help appreciated.
Sincerely,
John Welch
> From: Jonathan (Systems Glitch)
> the vtserver `rx` driver has a bug in it anyway where it continues
> reading past the end of the media
I'll be working with the RX driver for the standalone stuff soon on a project
of my own, I'll look into this then.
BTW, 'VTserver' refers to three pieces of software:
- The actual server, which runs under Unix on the 'server' machine
- A small bootstrap which downloads the main standalone program from the server
- A driver for the standalone software which adds a device which can talk to
the server over a serial line, as one of the devices for the standalone
The standalone software is V7 code that existed before VTServer did, more
on it here:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/Installing_UNIX_Seventh_Edition
and the RX driver is actually for that.
Noel
Hi everyone,
I originally posted this on VCFed (which was new to me) but the
moderation queue has had me waiting for about 3 days, so I thought I'd
ask here as well, the usual of gurus. :)
I was recently sent an RXV21 controller so I could test out my RX02
drive. When I power up the PDP-11 or reset the machine I get the nice
clunking sound which I have been told is normal. I expect I wouldn't
hear this if the ribbon cable was in the wrong way.
To test, I tried to use VTserver to dump the contents of a disk, but it
immediately threw an error. I soon realised there are two DIP switches
on the logic board of the RX02 drive which had to be adjusted to work
with the RXV21. So, I had some progress. Output of VTserver almost
looked promising but then it hangs, as below:
]] Tape record n from device xx is written as xx(0,0,n)
]] Disk drive xx is written as xx(0,0,0)
]]
]] Enter name of input record/device: rx(0,0,0)
]] Enter name of output record/device: vt(0,0,1)
]]
]] Opened copy.out read-write
]]
So, following some advice I booted via TU58em into XXDP and ran the
diagnostics:
]] DR>STA
]]
]] CHANGE HW (L) ? N
]]
]] CHANGE SW (L) ? N
]]
]] CZRXFB0 SYS FTL ERR 00040 ON UNIT 00 TST 011 SUB 000 PC: 003476
]] CSR BITS - LGC TST
]] AC LOW FATAL ERROR
]] REG ACTUAL=000000
]] REG EXPECT=000000
]]
]] POSSIBLE FAILING "FRU'S":
]] INTERFACE - M8029
]]
]] UNIT#0 RXCSR=000000 RXESR=000000 CMD=000000 ->
]] ->NO PWR, CABLED BACKWARDS, STRAPPED RX01, PDP-8
]] DROP UNIT#0 FROM TEST
]]
]] PASS ABRTD THS UNIT
]] CZRXFB0 SYS FTL ERR 00040 ON UNIT 01 TST 011 SUB 000 PC: 003476
]] CSR BITS - LGC TST
]] AC LOW FATAL ERROR
]] REG ACTUAL=000000
]] REG EXPECT=000000
]]
]] POSSIBLE FAILING "FRU'S":
]] INTERFACE - M8029
]]
]] UNIT#1 RXCSR=000000 RXESR=000000 CMD=000000 ->
]] ->NO PWR, CABLED BACKWARDS, STRAPPED RX01, PDP-8
]] DROP UNIT#1 FROM TEST
]]
]] PASS ABRTD THS UNIT
]] CZRXFB0 EOP 1
]] 2 TOTAL ERRS
So, the possible errors according to XXDP:
- Bad power - I get 25v, 5v and -5v. The motors are spinning, not
convinced it is this?
- Cable backwards - I don't think I'd be hearing that clunk.
- Strapped RX01 - I don't know what this means
- PDP8 - eh?
If anyone has any suggestions it would be great to hear them.
Thanks,
Aaron.
> Anyone know of a 40-pin UART with a FIFO? :)
16c550s are cheap as dirt. And you can stick a 16c850 or whatever the
latest incarnation is to a PLCC to DIP adapter.
> I've lately been doing the data transfer stuff using STM32F407
> development boards.
Chuck really has the right answer here. UART chips aren't going to
patch over that.
KJ
> From: William Degnan
> 1) the console rom does not go in any of the 4 bootstrap slots, these
> should be empty for now. There is a special console rom slot.
Just to clarify, by "slot", you don't mean 'backplane slot', you mean 'socket
(on the card)', right?
Also, note that the console/diagnostic ROM is a different size (bit-wise; I'm
not sure about the physical package) from the bootstrap ROMs.
> 6) possibly the only switch to worry about now is the power on auto
> jump to console switch.
I'd leave that, too, until we get the software console to run when started
manually - at the moment, the ROM's not working, so that switch is irrelevant.
Noel
Anyone looking for these old WD controllers? I've got a mixed tube of
the WD37C65-02 parts and the SMC FDC37C65B equivalents. $10+shipping
takes the lot.
--Chuck
> From: Steven Malikoff
> they mention it will be scrapped if no takers.
Don't be misled by the .au URL; the units are in Sacramento, CA. Anyone in
the Bay area up for saving these?
Noel
Hello all. I am posting these new items for sale. The master list is at
the following URL:
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?58709-New-Items-For-Sale-Check-th…
New Items for December 14, 2017
S-100
IMSAI VIO - 80x24 character display board used with IMSAI VDP-80; has (3)
gold-lidded Intel C2708 EPROMS - $175
North Star Computers 16K RAM Board - qty. 2; fully populated - $40 each /
$70 for the pair
North Star Computers MDC-4A Micro-Disk Controller - $85
Dynabyte 32K Fully Static RAM Module - fully populated; with original
Operating Manual - $50
California Computer Systems Model 2065 64K Dynamic Memory - no RAM chips -
$20
Cromemco TU-ART - w/ two ribbon cables terminating in DB-25 (male) and
original manual - $25
MSD S100 floppy disk controller with INS1771D chip - $20
Vector 3690-12 S-100 Test Extender - new old stock, still sealed in Vector
plastic packaging - $45 (<-- hint: good deal)
DEC
Camintonn 254 - 1MB QBus RAM boards - qty. 2 - $75 each / $140 for the pair
Homebrew/prototype(?) wire-wrap Unibus board wired with (2) Intel P2855A
and support chips; 8136-LG498-33-2; can be re-used - $35
M8396 DMF32 I/O - $20
M9202 Unibus Connector, Inverted - $15
G727A Grant Continuity - $5
M9312 Bootstrap Terminator - with Intersil M1-7621-5 PROM in ROM 1 - $60
Emulex SC02/A SMD disk controller; SU0210401 Rev E bootstrap; emulates
Digital RP11/RP02/RP03; includes BDV11-compatible line-time clock - $50
M8061 RLV12 RL01/02 QBus Disk Controller - $45
M7957 SG-2 I/O Communication card - $35
USDC 10-1108-02 QBus SCSI Controller - $150
SMS 0108 - some sort of Qbus disk (SCSI?) multi-controller?; has an 80186
and 4 SMS/OMTI PLCC chips - $best offer
AD413B Unibus hex module - has two 50-pin connectors; can't find info? -
$best offer
M8189 KDF11-B CPU - unknown condition; has a succession of maintenance
stickers: REJECTED 11/22/84; Clock circuit fails 3 Oct 91; BOOTS UP OK 17
May 96; photos upon request - $40
Miscellaneous
Apple 3.5" Drive - $25
Apple 800K External Drive (M0131) - $20
Roland CM-32LLA Sound Module - $60
XOR 12-slot S100 backplane with integrated power supply in chassis; no
cover, compact (~12"x18" footprint); good voltages - $35
Electronic Solutions Inc. Multi-CAGE Multi-Bus 12-slot backplane - $5
Vector 4610 Plugboard - STD buss prototyping board, solder pads on one side
in structured rows and gold plated edge connector, includes original
paperwork LA25-P2 Layout Paper and other inserts - $5
Ampro Little Board/Plus - quirky version unlike other units I found online;
has "Abaton" silk-screened onto circuit board, which is longer than the
usual LB/Plus; mounted with a 5.25" floppy drive in a small form factor
plastic/metal enclosure; cosmetic damage in front from being dropped on one
side; unable to test, as is, photos upon request - $50
Additional information and photographs for any item upon request, but
please have serious intent to purchase and not just being a looky-loo as I
field a lot of requests and it takes a lot of time to process.
I'm happy to negotiate a bulk price for multiple items. Your purchases are
always packed efficiently with superior care and materials. Shipping is
>from California. Local pick-up is highly encouraged (you get to shop my
inventory in person). International purchasers are always welcome.
As always, please send inquiries to me directly via e-mail at <
sellam.ismail at gmail.com> for fastest response.
Thanks!
Sellam
If anyone knows a source for the bag that holds the Sun Voyager computer
w/ keyboard + mouse I am interested. Would like to keep mine together.
- Ethan
> From: John Welch
> CLR
> 765000
> LAD
> EXAM
> 'Bus Err' light comes on.
Oooh, that's very interesting, and illuminative. The ROM isn't working (so
there's no way for the software console to work - its code is in that ROM).
So look at Section 1.5 of the Technical Manual
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/unibus/M9312_TechRef.pdf
and make sure all the jumpers on the M9312 are as required. In particular,
jumper W-8 should be _out_.
If it's not, that would explain why the ROM at 765000 isn't resonding. If it's
in, that M9312 board probably has a problem.
Also, while we're at it, it's probably worth making sure the CPU will
run. Do this:
CLR
LAD
777 (This is a 'branch .' instruction)
DEP
EXAM (Should display '777')
CLR (I think you can dispense with these
LAD two, but just to be safe...)
CTRL-START
'Run' light should come on
CTRL-HALT
'Run' light should go out, should display '0' (or maybe '2', I forget)
> Do you know which color wire (red, clear, black) goes to which festoon
> connector (TP1, TP2, TP3, TP4)?
I would leave them all disconnected for the moment; you don't need them. One
is the 'boot' switch on the console, and its ground. The other is the 'boot on
power on enable' (a duplicate of S1-2), and its ground. Since we're trying to
manually start the ROM console from the front console, they aren't needed for
that.
I don't recall offhand which one connects to which - I will have to check.
> Don't want to blow anything up.
Not sure it will harm anything if you connect things wrongly, but that's
not tested.
Noel
On 12/13/2017 10:41 PM, Jerry Weiss wrote:
> What is the configuration of jumpers?
I have tried the following:
??? 1?? 2?? 3?? 4?? 5?? 6?? 7?? 8?? 9?? 10
?? --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
S1 Off On? Off Off Off Off Off Off On? Off
S1 On? On? Off Off Off Off On? Off Off Off
S1 On? On? Off Off On On? Off Off On? Off
S1 On? Off Off Off On? On? Off Off On? Off
Maybe some others, never get anything to the screen.
I have some cards that are marked TP1:Red TP2:Blk TP4:Clr
and other cards marked TP1:Red TP2:Clr TP4:Blk
I would really like to hear from someone that has it working rather than
risking popping something.
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 10:34 PM, JCWelch <jcwelch at hal-pc.org
>> <mailto:jcwelch at hal-pc.org>> wrote:
>>
>> So far nothing puts ?@?, or anything on the screen.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 10:05 PM, Jerry Weiss <jsw at ieee.org
>> <mailto:jsw at ieee.org>> wrote:
>>
>> According to the documentation EK-M9312-TM-002 M9312
>> Bootstrap-Terminator Module Technical Manual
>> there are two addresses to use for the Console Emulator.
>>
>> 165020 (765020) ?for Console with Diagnostics ?SW 1 and 7 on
>> 165144 (765144) ?for Console w/o Diagnostics ??SW 1,5,6,9 on
>>
>> The switch settings below correspond to xxx004.. which is probably
>> the first drive for the ROM in position 1 and does
>> not invoke diagnostics.
>>
>> Have you tried 173000 (773000)?
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 8:37 PM, John Welch via cctech
>>> <cctech at classiccmp.org <mailto:cctech at classiccmp.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have bi-directional communication from PC/Hyperterminal. ??I
>>> forgot about having to tell HyperTerminal to echo characters
>>> locally. Anyway, 'a' comes over as 000141 and 'A' comes over as
>>> 000101. So far so good.
>>> However, I have not gotten "@"
>>> CNTRL+HLT
>>> CLR
>>> LAD
>>> DEP
>>> CNTRL+INIT
>>> CNTRL+START -> reads 000002
>>> CNTRL+BOOT ?-> reads 165024
>>>
>>> CLR, 165024 LAD, CTRL/START reads 165024
>>> 773024 LAD, EXAM, reads 165024
>>>
>>> Reconfigured the switches on the M9312
>>>
>>> ???1 ?2 ??3 ??4 ??5 6 ??7 ??8 ??9 ??10
>>> ?--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
>>> S1 Off On ?Off Off Off Off Off Off On ?Off
>>>
>>> CNTRL+HLT
>>> CLR
>>> LAD
>>> DEP
>>> CNTRL+INIT
>>> CNTRL+START -> reads 000002
>>> CNTRL+BOOT ?-> Run light is on, SR Disp light is on,
>>> CNTRL+HLT reads 173150
>>>
>>>
>>> CLR, 165024 LAD, CTRL/START reads 165024
>>> 773024 LAD, EXAM, reads 165024
>>>
>>> 773024 LAD, 773000 DEP, BUS ERR light comes on.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions? ?I have other M9312s I could try.
>>>
>>>> On 12/13/2017 12:38 PM, Henk Gooijen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jumping over the settings. They seem OK, as you get the AB in
>>>> Hyperterm.
>>>>
>>>> That 777564 shows 000200 is also correct (as I remember that): it
>>>> indicates ?transmit buffer empty?.
>>>>
>>>> You can also try it the other way:
>>>>
>>>> * type one character in Hyperterm
>>>> * check that 777560 has the receiver buffer full flag set (000200)
>>>> * in 777562 you will see the typed character (in octal)
>>>>
>>>> 773024 showing 165024 rings a bell. IIRC, 165024 is the start
>>>> address of the monitor on the M9312.
>>>>
>>>> That is the PROM ?in the middle? on the board.
>>>>
>>>> I think that if you enter CLR, 165024 LAD, CTRL/START you will get
>>>> the ?@?.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, there is a second start address. One does some diagnostics,
>>>> the other does not.
>>>>
>>>> My guess that on 773000 and you getting 773002 on the display means
>>>> that you try to boot
>>>>
>>>> from a ?device? that is specified in one of the four PROMs, but the
>>>> PROM socket is empty ?
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *Van:* cctech <cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
>>>> <mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org>> namens John Welch via
>>>> cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org <mailto:cctech at classiccmp.org>>
>>>> *Verzonden:* Wednesday, December 13, 2017 7:23:01 PM
>>>> *Aan:* cctech at classiccmp.org <mailto:cctech at classiccmp.org>
>>>> *Onderwerp:* 11/04 Project
>>>> I am back in front of the machine:
>>>>
>>>> The M7856 is set thusly:
>>>> ???1 ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 ?8 ?9 10
>>>> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>>>> S5 DN DN DN UP DN DN UP DN DN UP
>>>> S3 DN DN UP DN UP UP DN UP DN UP
>>>> S1 UP UP DN UP DN DN UP UP DN UP
>>>> S4 UP UP DN DN UP UP DN DN DN UP
>>>> S2 DN DN UP DN DN UP DN DN -- --
>>>>
>>>> The M9312 is set thusly:
>>>>
>>>> ???1 ?2 ?3 ?4 ?5 ?6 ?7 ?8 ?9 10
>>>> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>>>> S1 UP UP DN DN DN DN UP DN DN DN
>>>>
>>>> This should be 300, 8, Odd, 1
>>>> I have what I think is null modem between the M7856 cable and a PC
>>>> running XP with Hyperterm set to 300, 8,O,1
>>>>
>>>> Troubleshooting from the programmers console:
>>>> CNTRL plus HALT, no bus hang.
>>>>
>>>> CLR, 777566, LAD, 101, DEP, Hyperterm shows: A
>>>> CLR, 777566, LAD, 102, DEP, Hyperterm shows: AB (the B popped up
>>>> next to
>>>> the previous A )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CLR, 777564, LAD, EXAM, display shows: 000200
>>>> CLR, 773024, LAD, EXAM, display shows: 165024
>>>> CLR, 773024, LAD, EXAM, display shows: 165024
>>>> CLR, 773000, LAD, CNTRL plus START, console says: 173002
>>>>
>>>> I am thinking that the Hyperterm should be seeing an "@" and I
>>>> should be
>>>> able to boot from there.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> John Welch
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sincerely,
>>> John Welch
>>> 281-353-4706 Home
>>> 713-725-7017 Cell
>>> :qw
>>>
>>
>> Jerry Weiss
>> jsw at ieee.org <mailto:jsw at ieee.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Jerry Weiss
> jsw at ieee.org <mailto:jsw at ieee.org>
>
>
>
--
Sincerely,
John Welch
281-353-4706 Home
713-725-7017 Cell
:qw
I am back in front of the machine:
The M7856 is set thusly:
??? 1? 2? 3? 4? 5? 6? 7? 8? 9 10
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
S5 DN DN DN UP DN DN UP DN DN UP
S3 DN DN UP DN UP UP DN UP DN UP
S1 UP UP DN UP DN DN UP UP DN UP
S4 UP UP DN DN UP UP DN DN DN UP
S2 DN DN UP DN DN UP DN DN -- --
The M9312 is set thusly:
??? 1? 2? 3? 4? 5? 6? 7? 8? 9 10
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
S1 UP UP DN DN DN DN UP DN DN DN
This should be 300, 8, Odd, 1
I have what I think is null modem between the M7856 cable and a PC
running XP with Hyperterm set to 300, 8,O,1
Troubleshooting from the programmers console:
CNTRL plus HALT, no bus hang.
CLR, 777566, LAD, 101, DEP, Hyperterm shows: A
CLR, 777566, LAD, 102, DEP, Hyperterm shows: AB (the B popped up next to
the previous A )
CLR, 777564, LAD, EXAM, display shows: 000200
CLR, 773024, LAD, EXAM, display shows: 165024
CLR, 773024, LAD, EXAM, display shows: 165024
CLR, 773000, LAD, CNTRL plus START, console says: 173002
I am thinking that the Hyperterm should be seeing an "@" and I should be
able to boot from there.
Any thoughts?
Sincerely,
John Welch