I have a friend who has a number (10-20) of 8" RT-11 floppies he wants
to archive to CD-ROM or some other modern media. Is there anyone in
the Boston area (he lives in Medway) who could help with this? I
believe these are RX01 media since I think they were created on a
PDT-11/150 that I gave away to someone a few years ago. Can anyone
here help? What would the fee be for such a service?
Thanks!
David Betz
dbetz at xlisper.com
I'll be visiting Seattle next week for the Microsoft MVP Summit. The
Summit wraps up on Wednesday around 5pm in downtown Seattle. I'd love
to get together with other collectors for a beer, say at the Elephant
and Castle?
I'll be returning home on the weekend, so I have some time on Thursday
during the day, Friday and Saturday. Last time I got to check out
bear's collection (r.stricklin) and I'd love to see anyone's
collection that's willing to share :-)
Email me off-list and let's trade contact info and I'll give you a hollar!
-- Richard
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Hey folks. It looks like I'll be making a road trip from Port
Charlotte, FL (just south of Tampa, Gulf coast) all the way up to
Boston, and then back down, sometime next week. I'll be in a 24'
truck with a lift gate.
The southbound trip will be full, but the northbound trip will be
at least half empty, so I may be able to move big and/or heavy stuff
along that route. The requirements are that it be not too far off of
Route 95, and that any stops not take too much time. I will need a
few bucks for this.
Be aware that the scheduling and other details of this trip are
not yet set in stone.
Any thoughts? I'll need to hear back soon. Please CC me on any
replies, or email directly, as I'm only on cctech.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
>From the better-late-than-never department ....
Tonight I posted 43 articles from the former Computer Collector Newsletter /
Technology Rewind. Many of you will recall that I published this a a weekly
e-newsletter from Jan. 2004 to March 2006, with the help of Sellam Ismail,
Christine Finn, Erik Klein, Bill Loguidice, Michael Nadeau, and many others.
The newsletter ran for 2 years and 3 months. Now it's been 2 years and 11
months since the end. So, I finally got "a round tuit".
Read them at http://www.snarc.net/tr/newsletter.htm.
- Evan
Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 13:14:06 -0500, David Betz <dbetz at xlisper.com> wrote:
>
>> > I have a friend who has a number (10-20) of 8" RT-11 floppies he wants
>> > to archive to CD-ROM or some other modern media. Is there anyone in
>> > the Boston area (he lives in Medway) who could help with this? I
>> > believe these are RX01 media since I think they were created on a
>> > PDT-11/150 that I gave away to someone a few years ago. Can anyone
>> > here help? What would the fee be for such a service?
>>
>
> I obviously cannot help, but it would be nice if, once it is done,
> describe the procedure for others.
>
Just recently I was able to read my MiniMINC (a PDT-150) floppies with
an 8" drive connected to an AHA1542B (capable of single density) with
Dave Dunfields ImageDisk. I didn't write them back yet (inverted write
protect logic, but assume it will be no problem...
Fred Jan Kraan
Roy said:
>>> I've taken notice of them and have intentions of stopping in there
one of these times I make a trip to The City...
Consider making your trip in the second or third week of September. Then you combine it with a visit to VCF East in New Jersey!
Hi all,
I was searching for a company that sells 1" unoiled paper tape, here
in The Netherlands. No luck. After googling and many pages, I found
a company in the USA: http://www.wncsupply.com/paper-tape-rolls.html
I would like to buy one or two rolls of 1000 ft, order# 0400A,
R-V-PU471 Unoiled / Printed Top Arrow yellowish color, but it comes
in either a package of 28 rolls (1) and weighs 40 lbs, or in a quart
package, 7 rolls, still a weight of 10 lbs. The 7 rolls package costs
$80. That OK, but the shipping costs would make it quite expensive.
My question is simple.
Are there people on this list who also want to buy some rolls of 1"
nice looking yellow paper tape? I would take 2 (or 3) rolls.
Hint: Get a paper tape reader from an old CNC machine from eBay.
(I bought one for $30 and another for $79 two weeks ago). You can
interface such a reader to a computer, in my case the SBC6120 !
Think of it ... booting the SBC6120 from a paper tape. Is that cool?
The site also sells nice reels (http://www.wncsupply.com/reels.html).
I wanted to buy the 4" blue ones, but again shipping costs, aarggghh.
However, a nice lady from the company emailed me that she is looking
into the shipping costs, as the costs quoted on their site is a bit
high.
I hope to hear from one or two people also looking for a few paper
tape rolls ... Please contact me off list.
Links to other companies that sell 1" paper tape are also welcome!
Thanks,
- Henk, PA8PDP
If anyone is interested in this, send Rich an email. I already have
too many VMS boxes; I'd hate to see this get tossed.
John
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rich Asvitt <rasvitt at comcast.net>
Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Alpha or VAX machine wanted (dublin / pleasanton / livermore)
To: John Floren <slawmaster at gmail.com>
John,
I know it's been a while but are you still interested in getting a VMS machine?
My wife has been asking me what I'm going to DO with my workstation.
As I haven't cranked it up in over a year, I suppose it's time I find
it a good home. ?So if you're still interested, let me know and we can
work something out.
What we have is a Alpha 3000 with an internal disk there is also an
external disk drive. ?There is also a CD drive and a cartridge tape
drive. ?I just cranked it up today and deleted all my junk on the
disks, So it's running fine. ? So.......
Lemme know
Rich
Yea... I remember that place...I was over at Silicon Graphics back in I think 97 and I would stop by there. In fact every time I was in Silicon Vally I stopped by there. There were other places as well, I guess they are all gone now
I'm glad they are still around.
--- On Wed, 2/25/09, Tom Uban <uban at ubanproductions.com> wrote:
From: Tom Uban <uban at ubanproductions.com>
Subject: Halted
To: "On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 9:13 AM
Sorry if this has already gone around, but I only saw it yesterday
after a friend sent me the link:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/02/05/technology/personaltech/20090…
It reminded me of ELI in Cambridge Massachusetts, which was a similar
type of place back when I lived in the Boston area, but which is now
gone. I can only imagine that Halted will not be around too much longer
and I definitely want to stop there the next time I'm in the area...
--tom
>In emulation mode (V20) BP = (8080) SP. But I don't follow your
>logic on how to avoid it. Why JRT chose to code things that way,
>I'll never know, but it worked on 8080, 8085 and Z80 and not on V20,
>so it's a bug. And a bug in commercial (i.e. you paid money for it)
>software.
The code snippet you showed seemed to indicate that either you couldn't
preform a call to the same address contained in the stack pointer, or that
you couldn't preform a call as the next instruction after a lxi sp
instruction. Its not really clear which the problem is. I am assuming
the problem relates to following a lxi sp instruction immediatly with a
call instruction, I can see how pipelining instructions could cause this
failure. I cant immagine how calling the address which happens to match
the sp would be an issue.
My thought was that most cp/m programs either left the sp alone, and used
the stack provided by cp/m, or set up a local stack early on in the
program. In either case this bug could be completly avoided. Am I wrong
here? Is the bug related to calling the address which happens to be in
the sp?
>The instruction prefetch queue issue was well documented in the 386,
>as was the use of an unconditional jump to void the queue. Although
>it's lousy practice to use self-modifying code, I don't blame
>MicroPro for it--they wrote their code to an earlier processor.
>But claiming backward compatibility is a different game. Unless
>something is 100% backward-compatible with the original, you'd best
>not advertise it as being backward-compatible at all, unless you like
>answering support calls.
So as I understand your opinion, if NEC had stated in the V20
documentation, that you should not follow a lxi sp instuction immediatly
with a stack operation, this would not have been a bug. In the case of
the 386, they documented issues with the 386 queue, issues which crashed
commercial software, but which are not a bug. In this case, it was just
code written for an older processor.
Les
Hi All,
I am cleaning out my basement and came across a mystery Plessy core stack.
Its 16k by 16 and is a full height Unibus slot card.
Its one of those sandwiched controller/core stack type of card. Looks to be
able to only take up one slot which is nice.
Part number is PM 1116B
I suspect its a compatible 11/05 or 11/10 memory card but I am not sure.
I could plug it into one of my 11/05's but really don't want to do the old see
if it smokes test as I think this lil baby is kinda hard to find and desirable
to the right person/machine.
--
Kindest Regards,
"No Problems Only Solutions"
L.B. Network Consultants LLC.
Baltimore, Maryland
There's one on eBay right now, auction number 230326916375.
(not affiliated with seller, etc etc)
Too rich for my blood right now, but I'd love to hear that someone
here grabs it and gets it scanned.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
> It continued to do this for
> several reboots, but after running unattended for a few hours the hard
> disk was again unreachable
They took this opportunity to completely back up the contents of the
disk, right?
I've sent requests to join their mailing lists, which never get
approved. I've tried to contact the owners directly, but never get a
response.
I suspect my email is being dumped into a spam folder. (I've been on
the net so long and my email address has been so prominent, that
spammers have often used my email address as the forged From address
on their spam; as a result I've been placed on a bunch of filters and
its hopeless to try and get removed from them, since they don't notify
you that you've been put on a filter list.)
Does anyone have any successful contact with these sites?
<http://www.cray-cyber.org/general/start.php>
<http://www.cyber1.org/>
I've been trying to get in touch with them to get my PLATO terminals
up and running.
Thanks!
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
> On a related subject, have there ever been any non-contact (i.e.
> flying head) tape drives brought to market?
It looks like IBM filed a bunch of patents in the 70's on
flying head helical tape
http://www.google.com/patents?id=BZ4vAAAAEBAJ
Read the headers, It's 8" floppies and likely RX02.
For that you must have a PDP11 (maybe uVAX) and RX02.
David, I have an 11 with RX02. I can copy them to
RX50 or RX33 that can be read on PCs.
Allison
>
>Subject: RE: Archiving 8" RT-11 floppies to CD-ROM?
> From: Ian King <IanK at vulcan.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:57:30 -0800
> To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>I've developed a procedure for this. It's a bit roundabout but it uses easily available tools.
>
>Tools needed:
>- PDP-11 running RT-11, with an extra serial line (SLUx)
>- DOS PC with a serial port
>- PUTR program from John Wilson
>- TU58 emulator, which I found through Will Kranz' website
>
>At a high level the process looks like this:
>
>Install TU58 per its README file. Copy the contents of the floppy onto the emulated TU58 using the COPY/DEVICE command in RT-11. Some versions will gripe at you about the fact that the floppy may be bigger than the tape. RT-11 v4 seems perfectly happy with that, and the TU58 program doesn't care. :-) IIRC there are prompts from RT-11 v5, but you can provide answers that will direct it to do the full copy anyway.
>
>Use PUTR to copy from that tape image onto... whatever you want! PUTR will let you manipulate the individual files and copy them into DOS directories if you so choose. By using COPY/DEVICE, you can preserve "bootability" of bootable disks, as well.
>
>I've used the reverse of this process to create physical floppies from disk images as well as to restore floppies after disk failures. Of course, if you want to burn either the images or the individual files onto a CDROM, you'll have to have the files on a machine that supports that device, has burner software, etc. But at that point, they're just files in a DOS filesystem.
>
>Cheers -- Ian
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
>> bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Benedict Glaw
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 11:37 AM
>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>> Subject: Re: Archiving 8" RT-11 floppies to CD-ROM?
>>
>> On Tue, 2009-02-24 13:14:06 -0500, David Betz <dbetz at xlisper.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I have a friend who has a number (10-20) of 8" RT-11 floppies he
>> wants
>> > to archive to CD-ROM or some other modern media. Is there anyone in
>> > the Boston area (he lives in Medway) who could help with this? I
>> > believe these are RX01 media since I think they were created on a
>> > PDT-11/150 that I gave away to someone a few years ago. Can anyone
>> > here help? What would the fee be for such a service?
>>
>> I obviously cannot help, but it would be nice if, once it is done,
>> describe the procedure for others.
>>
>> Backup is one thing, restoring the image another. A third thing would
>> be to use that image on some simulator...
>>
>> MfG, JBG
>>
>> --
>> Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw at lug-owl.de +49-172-
>> 7608481
>> Signature of:
>> http://perl.plover.com/Questions.html
>> the second :
>
On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Jeff Walther wrote:
> And how is it more profitable to them to let this stuff sit in
> (costly) storage somewhere, rather than selling fifty pieces to
> someone who could use them?
IMHO: They do not have them sitting in storage. What they have
is a small hand-run chip-labeling machine and a bunch of random
chips. They grind off the original part numbers and label them
to whatever you wanted to buy. And they have a website with a bunch
of part numbers culled from various databases.
Google "counterfeit chips" and "counterfeit transistors".
Tim.
On Monday, February 23rd, Charles H Dickman wrote:
>> Robert Jarratt wrote:
>> The harness in my system does not seem to match any of the
descriptions I
>> have seen so far. The wires are not equal in length, but it is not a
ribbon
>> cable with IDC connectors either. The connectors are black rather
than
>> white. The harness wires do not seem discoloured, but I believe that
this
>> particular system may have only had light use in its day. I have a
picture
>> of the harness but I am not sure if the rules of this list allow
>> attachments.
>>
> The key point of your description is that the wires are not equal in
> length. This COULD be a bad thing.
On the BA23, the backplane and power supply connectors are at
right-angles to each other, so the 5-volt (red) wires are shorter
than the 12-volt (yellow) wires, as well as most of the grounds (black).
The same is true on the BA123.
As you can see in the ASCII art below, the 12v interconnect wires
end up being longer than the 5V wires.
This is normal.
I have a side-by-side photo of the old style cables, as well as the FCO,
however I don't have a convenient place to post it. If anyone wants it
for reference, let me know.
| 1
| 2
| V
|
| G
| n
| d
|
| 5
| V
5 V G n d 1 2 V
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
T
Hi everyone
A kind list member in my area has offered me a Nicolet 660 computer
free if I can haul it off, so I'm hoping to see if anyone else has any
information about it. Luckily all the documentation seems to still be
there so it's not a total mystery machine, but Google doesn't really
offer any info on it.
The Nicolet is a hip-high (3'?) cabinet that acts like a mini rack
(units slide in and out on rails). The disk unit sits on top and has
two SCSI 3.5" floppy drives and an SMD hard disk. Under that is the
CPU unit, which has (as I recall) a start/stop button, a program1
button, a program2 button, and a power switch. There is a VGA monitor
and an AT keyboard to go with it, both Nicolet branded.
The OS is called NICOS and apparently is FORTH-based. It also includes
floppies for FORTRAN, PASCAL, and BASIC. There is also a lot of
software for data collection and processing, as this was once hooked
up to lab equipment.
Apparently the hard drive has died. Is it easy to get replacement SMD
disks, or are there adapters that would let me plug in a SCSI drive or
something more common? This seems to be a very unique piece of
equipment that I would like to try to get working.
Thanks!
John Floren
--
"I've tried programming Ruby on Rails, following TechCrunch in my RSS
reader, and drinking absinthe. It doesn't work. I'm going back to C,
Hunter S. Thompson, and cheap whiskey." -- Ted Dziuba
>
>Subject: Re: 8088 vs. 80c88
> From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:58:23 -0800
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On 22 Feb 2009 at 22:17, Allison wrote:
>
>> Your kidding tight? ;)
>>
>> JRT pascal was fairly buggy itself and it was till arond V3 that it stopped being
>> noticalbly so.
>
>Buggy or not, the V20 wouldn't run it. Rich Naro verified the bug
>and published a MicroNote on it. And JRT was comparatively popular
>for the time. It boils down to the V20 not being able to run a
>commercially available 8080 product because of a fault in the CPU.
That may be true, bought it too but found it buggy on both 8085 and Z80 too.
Why did I buy it, $29.95 and I even got a copy, some didn't!
However using a buggy suite to prove a bug is weak even if it got lucky.
That it had bugs, can't argue that. They could have just as easily given
it the base uCOM78 instruction set instead. But how many V20s were bought
to run 8080 rather than as a faster varient of the 8088?
>Suppose a customer used an application written and deployed with JRT
>Pascal. What do we tell him? "JRT Pascal--ho, ho, ha, you must be
>kidding...."
>
>Nope, serious business. Who knows what other product could have used
>the same coding technique?
That's a regression testing issue. Generally getting functional code out
of it was at best luck till later versions.
>In a way, this was deja vu of a much earlier problem with the NEC
>version of the 8080, where NEC left the carry bit unaffected after a
>boolean operation, where Intel reset it. Considering that many 8080
>programs cleared the carry bit with something like "ORA A", do you
>think that CP/M would have run with the old NEC chip?
Yep, I as working for NEC then. What's also forgotton is Intel changed
the spec to match there part as it was deemed fine that way. Since NEC
was ground up from spec, oops. They also fixed it and copied many other
subtle timing bugs as well. Sometimes you get it wrong and other times
you don't.
In the industry the number of second source flubs are legion.. remember the
8251,2651, and friends.
FYI at the time CP/M did run with the old chip.
Allison
>
>--Chuck
Hi
Sounds like capacitors.
Alhough it's a switcher any high voltage/high value capacitors in the
PSU might well need reforming.
Quite often you will see caps with a pair if incised lines on top. This
makes them go pop instead of bang.
You would not want to see a PSU where they have gone bang.
Rod Smallwood
The DEC Collector
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jarratt
Sent: 21 February 2009 19:17
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: RE: Powering up a 20-year old MicroVAX II
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
> bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jarratt
> Sent: 20 February 2009 22:45
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Powering up a 20-year old MicroVAX II
>
> I have just collected a MicroVAX II which has been in storage and has
> not been powered on for 20 years. This is my first machine of such an
> age, unfortunately I am not particularly knowledgeable at the
> electronics level (I studied circuits academically 25+ years ago and
> can solder a bit, but that is as far as it goes). I know I will need
> to treat it carefully in order to get it working again. I plan to open
> it up and make sure I clear out any debris etc, but beyond that I need
> advice from those with the experience and knowledge that I lack on how
> to go about powering it up carefully.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Rob
After removing all the boards and leaving just the disk and tape drive
for load I impetuously decided to try powering it up. I knew the PSU
(model
H7864) was set for 110V and made the switch to 240V (I am in the UK).
When I connected the power cord, after a few moments there was a loud
pop, followed by another before I could pull out the power cord, smoke
rose from the PSU.
This sounded just like when I had once accidentally made a 110/240
mix-up.
The question is, could it be that I had not made the switch to 240
correctly, or could this just be down to the age of the PSU?
Regards
Rob