seems my last attempt to reply to the thread was eaten by yahoo.
What's the best way to gain access to the front of the tube (Rainbow mono monitor). Cut the tie wraps or use a skinny long phillips to detach the tube from the bezel. Apologies if someone answered this, problem is I just don't see the response.
I will check when I get home, which manual I actually have.? Last year when this topic came up I had offered to copy one of mine but when I requested some $ for the trouble, I never heard back again.? The pages are an odd size (at least to me) so copying was going to be a bit of a chore.
On the sentimental trail...? It was about 4 years ago that I went to join my wife in Nigeria.? I was unemployed and she lived in her company's compound so I didn't figure to get out much.? So I took with me a 150 in 1 kit (with manual) that I had picked up at a flea market.? I threw in a handful of random components for variety and added a cheap multimeter and spent many an afternoon with my set and the "All About Circuits" online books.
I've been a software guy my whole career and had always wondered how electronics actually worked.? I really enjoyed the whole experience, and the fact that I now I know a little something anyway.
I am putting out a call for help, I am looking to buy qty 2 of the
following:
BFW17A & BSX20 transistors.
Anyone who has 2 of each of these in working condition please let me
know, I am interested in trading/buying them from you.
Nick
My son bought this kit from a yard sale... but there is no manual.? I read on the internet that you might have the manual for this kit? It is the 75 in 1 made by Tandy for Radio Shack.
?
Thanks so much for any help.
?
Wayne
>
> You don't want to use a PC HD drive, Commodore disks are 40 track (OK, well, 35 track, but still), the narrower head of the 80 track PC drive will cause problems if you want to write.
Well, about 80% of the games sold for the C64 were in fact written on
industrial grade PC drives with Trace machines. Many titles use 80 track
mechanics and heads. It in fact works when the drive is well aligned and
you make sure the disk is empty, e.g. degaussed, before you do this,
otherwise you would risk keeping garbage for disks that were previously
formatted in a 40 track drive with wider heads.
All games that do stepping tricks with so called fat tracks or half
tracks can't be written with 40 track drives at all.
>
> An HD PC floppy drive will *NOT* read commodore 1541 disks.not a
> chance in hell. PC drives are MFM, commodore are not. totally
> incompatible.
You are totally wrong. The drive will happily read the disk, but you
need a controller that can make use of GRC coding and the special
encoding tricks used by copy protections. As the 1541 is a separate
computer, there is much freedom here.
> I've heard of people using catweasel with 1541 drives, mounted in
> their PC's also.
Really? Afaik the 80 track drives with 40 track wide heads were custom
made for Commodore and don't have a Shugart connector.
> those are very different from commodore disks,someone already
> mentioned commodore have up to 40 tracks,what about half-tracks, and
> copy-protected disks? will they read v-max disks?commodore software
> got heavily into copy protection,like rapidlok, and worse in the later
> days
Indeed. These will cause trouble when read with a 1541 for various
reasons. Some protections work by using the index while recording (which
the 1541 does not have...), later read a specific track and then step
ahead to find some special data when reading a few tracks later. You
can't write such protections with a standard 1541 as it lacks the index
to aling your data to.
Other protections vary bit cell density, which is ok for reading, but
can't be written with an unmodified 1541, some make tracks so long and
write them in one pass, so you need more ram in a 1541 and some will
even trick the sync detection which is not very reliable in the 1541.
What makes things worse is that the format used for storing such data,
g64, is very badly implemented in most of the emulators out there. To
our knowledge all emulators are working with a fixed track size of 7928
bytes per track, which will give trouble for e.g. V-MAX! style disk, at
least everything before V3.
We are working with Pete Rittwage (author of Nibtools) to find out if we
can help enhance e.g. Vice to support properly imaged disks that have
demanding protections. Currently some g64s need tampering with, some
even need cracking the game, because the format can't properly store the
protection (see e.g. Pirates! for fun invloved). See:
http://c64preservation.com/dp.php?pg=bangui6
If anyone wants to take a look... we do have V-MAX disk images of
Defender Of The Crown that are definitely beyond what emulators will
accept at the moment. Let me know...
> I'd say zoomfloppy, simply because of nibtools, which is the most
> feature-rich for commodore disks I've found.especially where
> copy-protection is involved. And, the fact it can write images back to
> disk gives it a distinct advantage. this is only for commodore style
> disks, other platforms would have their preferred tool(s). Dan.
I would agree, at least if writing is important to the person using it.
KryoFlux currently does not write g64 files, so it's for reading only
(at the moment). We do have a preliminary STREAM to g64 converter, which
spits out files that are correct in regard to what's on the disk
(leaving out e.g. varying density in a track, which can't be stored by
the file format itself), but fail in emulators, because, as written
above, all of them work with a fixed track size and so forth. Some
protections will fail if the track size is wrong.
If you are going for an estimated 85% of things out there, can live with
losing index information, don't fear messing with images, having e.g.
three to four separate g64s for one game for different emulators, want
to start tweaking the drive to alter rotation speed (therefore creating
e.g. longer tracks at the cost of slightly wrong recording coercivity),
and need a cheap solution, ZoomFloppy with a 1541 and Nibtools will work
ok. I also have one for testing, it's very well executed and Jim Brain
delivers quality. If you want to go beyond, KryoFlux might come handy.
E.g. a 1541 will never show you recording tricks like varied bitcell
width, "killer tracks" full of syncs etc. But it's work in progress, and
won't be fully ready tomorrow.
Modifying a drive to make it read flippy disks in one pass, like at the
recording stage, is a pain. Just for the record.
Enjoy.
Chris
not going to be an issue in my case. Still cant get it open...if by screws the poster meant the hexagonal lugs or whatever in back then i guess its april 1 after all...
------------------------------
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 4:16 PM EDT Tony Duell wrote:
>>
>> VR201? Remove screw under cover in the centre of the rear panel between
>> plug and pots. Lower adjustment leg to fully out.=20
>>
>> Screen blue spot?=20
>>
>> a) Run a hot wire (Styrofoam cutter) between the outer screen and the fro=
>> nt
>> of the tube.
>>
>> Or =20
>>
>> b) (only for CRT familiar persons) Remove the tube completely. Place in
>> something to support it at the face end. Don goggles and gloves. Chip awa=
>> y
>> the outer faceplate bit by bit. Peel off the soft plastic. Polish up the
>> tube front, rebuild the monitor and put spacers at the four corners then
>> replace casing. Does wonders for the brightness as well.
>
>Look, I know what day it is, but practical jokes are supposed to be
>funny, and not endager innocent bystnaders at som random future time.
>
>CRT implosions are not common, I agree. But they must be serious enough
>tat even in the less safety-concious times of 50 years ago all TV sets
>had some kind of implosion protection.
>
>Unless you have definiete infroamtion to the contrary, I will go by what
>every CRT data sheet I've looked at says. That the twin-panel faceplate
>acts like a laminated windscreen and supports te screen i nthe even of an
>implosion, preventing the user from being showeed in fragments of glass.
>Most CRT datasheets also say that no attempy must be made to remvoe the
>outer layer, but I think it's popsible to do this safely _provided you
>then re-bond the layers together properly_. LEaving off the outer layer,
>or not bonding it to the frotn of the envelope is not acceptable IMHO.
>
>You don't know when the CRT could implode, or who might be in front of it
>at the time.
>
>-tony
> From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
>
>
>
> Well, I just timed it: Clean slate to running VMS system with a tape
> image mounted on an emulated drive, under simh. 26 minutes.
>
That's because you know what you are doing.
> But suit yourself. ;)
>
>
>>> I don't know your level of expertise with VMS or simh, so please don't
>>> take this the wrong way, but...if you want to do that and would like
>>> some help, I'd be happy to help you out. I can put together a "canned"
>>> simh VMS installation for something like this in a very short time.
>>>
>>>
>> I got simh to teach my kids some machine language programming on the
>> PDP-11.
>> (We had a class last Sunday.)
>>
>
> Nice!! How old are they? (if you don't mind my asking, I am just
> curious)
>
Range from 12 to 22.
>
> Sweet!!
>
>
Yeah, back in 1986 or so, this was a totally awesome system! Fooling
around with
these tape images on disk shows me (again) how far computers have come.
I can scan
a 30 MB file in a fraction of a second! I'm sure that would have taken
10 minutes or
so on the KA-630.
> Jon Elson wrote :
>> If all else fails, I suppose I could go that way, but this vmsbackup
>> program
>> seems to try to work, it probably needs a little tweak. It detects the
>> 80 byte
>> header records and stops. All the VMS Backup tapes I've checked so far
>> have two 80 byte headers, this program seems to want one 256-byte header.
>>
>
> That doesn't sound too tough to deal with. Good luck!
>
I've finally established contact with the last guy who worked on the
vmsbackup program,
he suggested removing the offending tape headers with xxd, but if you
cut the top lines
off the file, it uses the address column on the left and you end up with
zeros in their
place. Anybody know a way to edit a tape container file to remove a few
tape blocks
>from the beginning?
I know I could write a program that does this exactly, and my just do so
tonight.
Basically, it would extract the backup files verbatim from the tape image.
Jon
At 11:16 AM 4/3/2012, Rob wrote:
>getting to grips with simh, locating images and and working out how to
>install it all etc. A ready-to-roll VM type thing would definitely
>get a download off me, though! Please consider it..
I bit of googling showed a few people on the SimH mailing list
were thinking about a virtual appliance version. I don't know if
they did it. They were talking about a stripped-down Linux.
So how would we connect a glass terminal or a DECwriter to it?
- John
I WAS LOOKING FOR A SMALL SOFTWARE PROJECT TO DO ON VINTAGE HARDWARE.
THE HUNT DIDN'T GO ON LONG BEFORE IT HIT ME. ONLY ONE THING COULD
POSSIBLY DO: CALCULATE PRIME NUMBERS ON MY TRUSTY PR1ME 5340
MINICOMPUTER.
THE 5340 IS A SOPHISTICATED MACHINE, CMOS BASED, AND UTILIZING CUSTOM
HIGH DENSITY GATE ARRAYS TO REDUCE THE PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE CPU AND
MAIN MEMORY (16 MB) TO WELL UNDER 225 SQUARE INCHES. POWER
CONSUMPTION IS WELL UNDER 10A, TOO, AND THE MACHINE CAN RUN WITHOUT
HEAVY AIR CONDITIONING. JUST A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, EVEN A HIGH END
ECL DESIGN COULD NOT PROVIDE THE SAME LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE IN SEVEN
TIMES THE BOARD SPACE, AND IT STILL WOULD HAVE REQUIRED 30A TO 50A OF
WALL POWER, PLUS SEVERAL THOUSAND BTU OF CHILLING.
SINCE THE PR1ME ARCHITECTURE IS TARGETED AT SCIENTIFIC USERS, AN
ARBITRARY PRECISION NUMBER PACKAGE IS NOT READILY AVAILABLE. AFTER A
FEW TESTS, I CONCLUDED THAT THE HARDWARE QUAD PRECISION FLOATING POINT
SUPPORT WAS A POOR CHOICE DUE TO THE SCALE OF THE ROUNDING ERRORS I
WAS SEEING. THE PR1ME FLOATING POINT IMPLEMENTATION IS QUITE GOOD,
BUT WHEN ALL OF THE SIGNIFICANT DIGITS ARE TO THE LEFT OF THE DECIMAL
POINT, THERE IS VERY LITTLE IT CAN DO.
BUT ALL WAS NOT LOST, AS HAS NO DOUBT BECOME OBVIOUS BY THE POSTING OF
THIS MESSAGE. THE ARCHITECTURE ALSO SUPPORTS PACKED AND UNPACKED
DECIMAL ARITHMETIC, WHICH CERTAINLY DOESN'T SUFFER FROM ROUNDING
ERRORS. IT CAN EVEN STORE NUMBERS AS LARGE AS 63 DIGITS IN LENGTH.
PERFECT!
I WAS NOT WILLING TO SIMPLY CODE UP SOME MATHEMATICIAN'S DUBIOUS
ALGORITHM -- I WANTED TO BE SURE NOT TO MISS ANY VALID PRIMES.
INSTEAD, I CAREFULLY DESIGNED MY OWN, AND VALIDATED IT USING A LARGE
CORPUS OF TEST DATA (ALL INTEGERS BETWEEN 1 AND 100). THE CODE USES A
NUMBER OF ADVANCED TECHNIQUES FOR ACCURACY AND HIGH PERFORMANCE,
INCLUDING:
* SEQUENTIAL SEARCH FOR POSSIBLE FACTORS.
* CYCLING TO THE NEXT POTENTIAL PRIME IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERING AN
INTEGRAL FACTOR, INSTEAD OF CONTINUING TO TEST ALL REMAINING POSSIBLE
FACTORS.
* TESTING ONLY FACTORS LESS THAN HALF OF THE CANDIDATE PRIME.
* NOT TESTING FOR DIVISIBLENESS BY 1.
* TESTING ONLY ODD CANDIDATE PRIMES.
* HAND-CODED IN PR1ME ASSEMBLER.
USING THESE METHODS, I WAS ABLE TO ACHIEVE REMARKABLE PERFORMANCE. IN
TESTING, THE PROGRAM EXECUTED ABOUT 3,086,913,596 DECIMAL DIVISION
OPERATIONS IN 11 HOURS AND 17 MINUTES, FINDING THE FIRST 10544 PRIME
NUMBERS, AT A RATE OF ABOUT 75994 DIVISIONS PER SECOND, AND NEARLY 935
PRIMES PER HOUR. TRY _THAT_ IN BASIC ON YOUR IBM 5150!
THE SOURCE PROGRAM, AND AN OUTPUT FILE WITH START AND END DATE STAMPS
AND THE FOUND PRIMES, ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERUSAL AT
http://yagi.h-net.msu.edu/primenumbers/.
SUGGESTIONS FOR ENHANCEMENT OR CORRECTION OF THE PROGRAM WILL BE
GRATEFULLY RECEIVED BY THE AUTHOR.
DE
Honestly guys. This conversation sounds very bitchy. If it wasn't Bill
Gates who dominated the OS area in the 1980s and 1990s someone of the same
ilk would of.
Regardless what you think of them survival in business is always the
survival of the fittest. Gates was at the top of that game for a while.
Anyone who gets beats off the competition at that level has got to be
ruthless and clever. I don't condone it, but its a fact.
At least he IS doing something good with his money.
Let's move on from the constant Microsoft bashing, please!
Tez
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dennis Boone <drb at msu.edu> wrote:
> > Very true; as this isn't a merit-based society. He was a damn good
> > programmer "back in the day", though; pity he didn't stick to that.
>
> Some of the things I've heard about the early basic interpreter make me
> wonder if he was really a good programmer.
>
> De
>
Im making this big carload of TRS-80 magazines/owners manuals free to
someone who will take the time, scan it and put it online.
Its free for pickup at my home in Flushing MI
Now that I have read in a few archival tapes and unpacked the simple
ones (ANSI-D) I am looking at extracting files from VMS BACKUP
tapes. I found a program vmsbackup originally by John Carey at
Monash University in AU. It actually seems to understand my
tape container format, maybe because it is practically identical
to some other formats. But, it is complaining that my tape
has 80-byte header records, and it wants 256. My tapes start
out with VOL1, HDR1 and HDR2 80-byte records, then a tape mark and
then the backup save set follows. I get the message :
Invalid header block size: expected 256 got 80
So, does anyone know whether there is a version of this program that
will handle a backup tape with 80-byte header records, or is there
another program for extracting files from a VMS backup tape or
save set that will run on Linux?
Thanks,
Jon
Im cleaning out the shed. I got tons of tandy radio shack
documentation, Also got a Tandy 1400HD Laptop that wont power up,
Along with a Tandy 386 and a Tandy 486 that work perfect.
2 Huge boxes full of Micro80 Magazine, and Microcomputer magazine
Lots of Model 1, 3 and 4/4p Owners Manuals
Lots of software manuals..
If anyones interested in the lot I can get a listing. Id like to sell
this off in one lot to get my shed space back.
Im thinking $200 for it all, and theres enough to fill the back of a
car. Local Pickup is always welcome at my place in Flushing MI
There are no screws specific to keeping the back cover on. The only screw/s have to do with the orientation contraption. Do I remove that and use a case popper like a mac?
------------------------------
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 3:04 PM EDT Tony Duell wrote:
>>
>> Dropping them from a high place usually does the trick ;-)
>
>While this is probably a quicker way of gettign the casing off, the time
>taken to put it back on again is much longer than with the 'remove the
>screw' method. And I think it's the total repair time that's important.
>
>-tony
> From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
>
> This may be a crazy idea, but...Why not do it with VMS?
>
Well, I have a real VAXstation here, with a tape interface that probably
works,
and I probably still have ESDI drives with VMS on them. But....
> You can install simh on your Linux box, get VMS up and running in
> probably half an hour, complete with IP networking. Mount your tape
> images via simh and extract your savesets with the software that they
> were written to be extracted by. :)
>
I have great difficulty thinking it is that simple.
> I don't know your level of expertise with VMS or simh, so please don't
> take this the wrong way, but...if you want to do that and would like
> some help, I'd be happy to help you out. I can put together a "canned"
> simh VMS installation for something like this in a very short time.
>
I got simh to teach my kids some machine language programming on the PDP-11.
(We had a class last Sunday.)
I appreciate the offer, but this would be a last resort. I know VMS
darn well, I was
system manager and general developer on two VAX systems, and then on Alpha
systems for a number of years. I ran a MicroVAX (KA-630) in my home from
1986 to 2007 when the hard drive broke. I upgraded it over the years, wrote
my own driver for a 3rd party tape controller that never had a VMS driver,
wrote a driver and built an interface for a Jupiter 7 graphics system,
and interfaced
a bunch of home energy monitoring stuff to it. Also attached a VCB-02 color
graphics board set to it, which was never really supposed to work on a
KA-630, but it did. Just the console wouldn't work right through the
VCB-02,
so sometimes I had to hook up a serial terminal.
But, although I REALLY liked VMS 20+ years ago, I have moved on, and
am now pretty comfortable in Linux. (Do miss the regularity of VMS, if you
know how to specify the options of one command, then all similar commands
will be the same.) The purpose of this exercise is to recover archival
programs
before the tapes turn into dust.
If all else fails, I suppose I could go that way, but this vmsbackup program
seems to try to work, it probably needs a little tweak. It detects the
80 byte
header records and stops. All the VMS Backup tapes I've checked so far
have two 80 byte headers, this program seems to want one 256-byte header.
Jon
At 21:43 -0500 4/2/12, Terry wrote:
>At least he IS doing something good with his money.
Well said. Hear, hear!
>Let's move on from the constant Microsoft bashing, please!
I do make a distinction between Gates bashing and Microsoft
bashing, and yet another distinction between unthinking Microsoft
bashing (not meritorious in its own right) and bashing of specific
destructive practices (somewhat meritorious in my view). And finally,
another distinction between that and making constructive suggestions
or contributions to correct damage done by destructive practices
(highly meritorious in my view). I applaud the suggestion to move
>from one end of that spectrum to the other.
But I think I merely elaborate what Terry said first and more
concisely.
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
hello all,
yesterday my wife and I emptied our garage(25 years of diverse things
stocked inside).I found again my hp1000,I saw a vax8200,a a lot of things
that suddenly made me rich :-))etc...and I
found something I had totally forgotten ,bought a long time ago as a part of
lot bought at the near army base:a Tektronix microprocessor emulation
system,made of two (big!!!) racks a 8510 and a 8310.I opened them just to
see ,and immediately I saw the two purple dec handles in the 8510....
A lsi 11/2 was here.I brought the rack inside ,removed the dust and spiders,
connected to the terminal line labeled 'auxilliary' a VT320 and powered it
up,after a few tests,I found the correct speed (2400 bauds) and got the odt,
using the run/halt switch of the front panel.
I has 32k of ram,the console is at correct place,but the fdc is not at
177170,so I doubt it can boot standart rt11.Unfortunately I found an error
in the memory:bit 9 of the first 16k bank is stucked to 1,it may be only a
ram chip (4116)to change,the 2nd bank is correct,a few test programs were
ok.
So if you see such a machine it can be useful.
I'd like to find maintenance informations about the Tektronix boards.
I'try to repair the mem board,and will continue to play with it.
Best regards to all.
Alain Nierveze
492 all?e Montesquieu
33290 Le Pian Medoc
France
nierveze at radio-astronomie.comwww.radio-astronomie.com
Steven:
I'll take them, u can ship them FedX Ground using my FedEx number
System Surety Group
14469 Manuella Rd
Los Altos CA 94022
Account # 104208657
You can take them to a FedEx Office store and have them pack them if u want.
They'll probably wind up at the Computer History Museum if they want them.
Tom
(650) 941-5324
> Message: 27
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
> From: steven stengel <tosteve at yahoo.com>
> To: cctech at classiccmp.org
> Subject: FREE: "Electronics" magazines from 1973-1975
> Message-ID:
> <1333416827.82454.YahooMailClassic at web110610.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> About 2 dozen old "Electronics" magazines - see photos here:
>
> http://66.147.242.85/~oldcompu/maine/electronics1.jpg
> http://66.147.242.85/~oldcompu/maine/electronics2.jpg
>
> You pick-up or pay shipping from 92656 So Cal.
I have a big old Decision Data model 6606 line printer that is rusted,
busted, done and dusted. I am considering sending to the grinder,
because it would be a *lot* of work getting back and running. My mind
would be really put at ease if someone on the East coast had a nicer
DD 6606 that they would like to part with (which, when it comes to
floor standing line printers, is not too much to ask). Anyone?
--
Will
In the UK thats not what they should teach. They are suppposed to teach
primes have two distinct factors, 1 and the prime. As for 1 these are both
the same number its not prime.
On 2 Apr 2012 07:34, "Eric Smith" <eric at brouhaha.com> wrote:
Derrik Walker wrote:
>
> Whats frakked up, is that they still teach one is a prime to this day.
I wonder how much progress Bill Gates has made on the mathematical problem
he pointed out in his book, of factoring very large prime numbers.
I acquired a little Epson HI-80 plotter the other day - for a
"consumer-grade" device with a small page size it looks to be quite a nice
little unit. Of course the pens are all but dried up (there's a little life
left in the red and blue, enough to see that the self-test is working).
So... has anyone tried adding fresh ink to these? I assume the pens
themselves haven't been sold in well over 20 years. It looks like it's
probably possible to open the pens up, but I assume that any replacement
ink needs to be just the right consistency for it to soak into the pen tips
properly but not end up all over the place.
cheers
Jules
A company has made some replica 8/E handles and has excess they are
willing to sell at $1.50 per handle. I think they have around 25 of each
color left. Due to the company not wanting to deal with a bunch of small
orders I may need to be an intermediary.
Pictures of the switch handles next to my 8/E handles and two 8/M handles
sitting on top at URL below. It also has a picture of the panel they made.
They said ok to share the picture but I can't say why they made them.
http://www.pdp8online.com/ftp/misc/switches/
The color of one matches my 8/E pretty well but the other doesn't. You can
also see for one of the colors my 8/E doesn't match my 8/M that well either.
If interested email me with how many you are wanting of which color.
Hi,
Friends of mine have an old, not that much DEC compatible PDP11 like
machine that they (and me) would get working again.
The machine is located at the German Chemical Museum in Merseburg.
http://www.robotrontechnik.de/index.htm?/html/computer/k1600.htm
Scroll down to the K1630. The Machine was rescued from the old power plant
in Thierbach before.
It is an PDP11 build out of some east german 8 Bit Bitslice CPU's and has
248K Ram. They used an unusual BUS, an Z80 Sio for The console (this is really
ugly) und Bus communication controllers on each peripheral board that must
be configured before the first use of that board, this means the IO Adress,
DMA Registers, Modes and Vector addresses are set in Software before the
Processor can talk to them like in a PDP11, so every DEC-OS must be patched to
work on this thing. It is a slow machine too :-)
We now have some CPTP Dumps of BRU Backup Tapes of the Operating System
OMOS for this machine (old version of RSX11)
I have a copy here http://www.tiffe.de/Robotron/K1630
There are 2 Versions omos-sys.tape.gz is the original type file in CPTP
Format, omossys.tap.gz is the same thing converted with taput to simh tape
format. Same with the dok tape, the docs are in german...
My friend Oleg told me that the tape files are broken, may be this is the
fault of taput (http://www.mrynet.com/hp2000/taput/index.html).
My question is if somebody can verify what is going on with the files and
if an opensource utility exists that can read BRU files on unix (like my
FreeBSD here)....
I think the OMOS-SYS Tape is the only real chance to boot this thing
sometime again..
Kind Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741