Mike,
Good info, thanks. I actually have a copy of the ON THREE manual...I
forget where I found it or why I have it, because I wasn't aware that I had
that board until a couple of days ago.
Thanks for the offer of the loaner board. I may take you up on that, but
let me try using the ON THREE manual and making sure the board is installed
correctly and and everything is seated properly. And, if I can pinpoint
the bad chips, I might try ordering some replacements to see if it can be
fixed. If I eventually do swap in one of your loaner boards, I'm wondering
if I can roll the other changes back? It looks like there were a number of
mods made to the motherboard to accomodate the 512K board....including new
ROMs. I certainly don't have the original ROMs to put back.
At any rate, my holiday vacation time and the disproportionate amount of
time I've been able to spend on this hobby, is about to end, so it may take
me a bit of time to get to all of it. But thanks very much for all the
info, I feel like I have a much clearer picture of how the III works and
what I need to do.
Win
Hi Win,
Yes, bad RAM could definitely cause that. The board you have was
manufactured by ON THREE, which got its start as an Apple III users
group. Once Apple turned its back on the III, ON THREE stepped up and
began producing its own hardware and software for the computer. Apple
had advertised the III as being expandable up to 512K, but never
released a board larger than 256K. As the ON THREE engineers
discovered, it required some new ROMs and additional addressing lines,
but they got it working. That 512K board is fairly rare and sought
after by III collectors, as SOS and big programs like Pascal can
really benefit from the extra room.
I'm not sure how easy it is to locate replacement chips for that board
these days. Last time I checked (a few years ago), they were still
available if you knew where to look. I have a few extra RAM boards
for the III (256K and 128K, though - not 512K). I could loan you one
for troubleshooting purposes, if you're interested.
I wrote a quick blog entry a while back about ON THREE's card:
http://www.6502lane.net/2011/01/17/a-look-at-on-threes-512k-memory-board-fo…
Also, I have a PDF version of the user manual that came with it. The
links in that blog entry are dead, but I can upload it, if you want.
- Mike
On 12/31/2012 11:24 AM, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
>>> Ironically, the garbage collected languages lead people to write even
>>> sloppier code than they write in C++.
>>
>> ...and that's saying something!
>>
>>> They think that garbage
>>> collection is a silver bullet that frees them from having to consider
>>> the resource consequences of their implementation.
>>
>> Yes. "I'm a MODERN programmer! We don't have to worry about stuff
>> like managing our own memory anymore!"
>>
>> Morons.
>
> Exactly. The "key phrase" that I encounter is "I don't want to have to
> think about...". If someone I'm interviewing says that, the interview
> tends to end fairly quickly.
Hear hear!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
>> See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrwpXEiTDVk
> I noticed but could not identify:
> 07:13 calligraphic graphics system with hidden line removal. Could be
> an Evans & Sutherland LDS-1, but might be something earlier.
> I've seen this system in several NASA films, but I've never been
> able to get any information on the hardware used.
I scratched my head at that myself. There's a slant to the frame not too different than the perspective you'd get if you had a movie camera pointed at some graphics terminal.
Several technologies I know of at that time, would not result in any such slant:
State of the art for several scientific application in that area, involved pen plotters (black ink on white paper) transferred to photographic negative movie film. (White image on black).
A slightly cheaper approach (used extensively in my area of academia) was line printer paper plots transferred to movie film (again often in negative). Sub-character resolution was possible through choice of characters (not dissimilar to "ASCII graphics" although I know the movies were made using IBM and EBCDIC!)
There was talk of direct-laser-to-film but I never saw it.
Tim.
Mike,
Another follow up that probably sheds a bit more light on my Apple III
issue. I tried copying some additional disk images today. I tried the
CFFA SOS image, but it exhibited the same behavior as the other SOS
image...the floppy drive spins for about 3 sec and then nothing. On a
whim, I tried the RAM test image. It worked and brought up the RAM test
screen and began the test. It stops and indicates bad RAM where shown in
the pic in the imgur link below. There appears to be third party RAM in
this III. Is that common? Is there a way to test without that RAM that
would be recommended? I did reset all of the RAM chips on the board, but
it still fails at the same location.
http://imgur.com/a/c40m0
On the bright side, I'm thinking this is a good sign for the floppy
drive...the down side is obviously RAM issues.
Thanks,
Win
A couple other related questions and a comments. I made a Apple III+
system diagnostics disk and that ran fine too. So it seems like the floppy
drive is Ok, and all of the tests passed except the RAM test, so that's the
big issue. The RAM test disk seems to help narrow down where the bad chip
may be, so I might have a chance to find it without trial and error.
It looks like there are two different RAM chips on the ON THREE board (as
Alexandre mentioned) TMS4164-15NL and D41256C-15. It turns out I have an
extra AST SprintDisk for my Apple IIe with a few D41256C-15 chips. If I'm
lucky enough that one or more of those is the culprit, I may be covered,
otherwise I'll need to source a few chips.
If you look at the end of the ON THREE board in the second pic
http://imgur.com/a/c40m0
there is a white header connector on the ON THREE board that connects to
the male header on the Apple III motherboard. The ON THREE manual
indicates that a gentle rocking should loosen the connector. It is a
strange looking connector. The pins appear to come through from below and
bend at 90 degrees. I've applied quite a bit of force and they are not
breaking free. I'm afraid to pull too hard. Any pointers on how these
connectors work so I can avoid damage?
Thanks,
Win
>
> I made the same experience when I performed a "DEC-format-marathon" with ten
> ST-225 drives which were neither DEC-labeled nor where DEC-formatted before.
> Most of my disk drives where successfully formatted after having entered the
> drive parameters for the "TEST 70" procedure, but in case of some drives,
> the procedure was aborted. These drives where not successfully recognised
> as RD31 and no format was performed by my microVAX-2000 in these cases.
> What I found out is that the drives which were not recognised as RD31's were
> drives with some bad blocks detected when formatted with a PC.
> Can anybody else comment on or has made that experience?
>
I successfully formatted several oddball non-DEC-branded drives rescued from
a skip (dumpster) using a VS2000. It was a long time ago and I don't remember
the details but I suspect some at least had a list of bad blocks on the label.
I seem to recall that I did not have any way of knowing what the correct
parameters were and I found some by extrapolating from the example in the manual
and by trial and error. I agree with the general view that they should be
jumpered as DS3 for the internal drive.
I eventually made a new drive cable so that I could have a "hot swappable"
disk outside the case. This worked great until I came upon one particular drive
which, when I pushed the connectors onto it, the VS2000 PSU promptly switched
itself off. I was somewhat puzzled as I was using an external PSU for the disk
and could not have been overloading the VS2000 PSU or so I thought. I pulled
off the connectors, power cycled the machine and tried connecting the drive
again and the same thing happened. Not to be defeated, I tried connecting all
the cables up and then powering up the VS2000. This time the PSU tried harder,
the machine powered up and one of the wires in the data cable turned itself into
a heating element, melted and nearly set fire to its insulation. It seems that
one of the wires in the data lead to the external drive has a not very well
protected +5V on it and at least one drive variant shorts this to ground...
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
On 31 December 2012 04:27, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
> Now that is seriously interesting! I knew there was a reason I was keeping
> up with this thread!
Thanks! [*Chuffed*]
I ought to have given due credit to another of the Giant Brains behind
FreeGEM, John Elliott, who is also on the list now, too. John is a
hero and a major force in PC-GEM, CP/M and Amstrad-related
development, emulation and various other areas, too.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
On 2013-01-01 19:00, "Rob Jarratt"<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
>> >bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of allison
>> >Sent: 01 January 2013 03:06
>> >To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only
>> >Subject: Re: What PDP11 OS in 20MB Disk Space
>> >
>> >On 12/31/2012 04:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>>> > > Straight 11M (non-plus) does. (fits in 10 actually) Early RSTS/E,
> like v8,
>> >should, but not 10 and likely not 9. RT11 does.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Dave
>>> > >
>> >I have RSTS on RL02 so it must fit on 10mb!
>> >
>> >RT11 fits on anything, the whole build kit is two RL02s (boot and kits)
>> >
>> >I know of none that do not fit. RSTS and RSX are big and might have to be
>> >trimmed
>> >a little or some optional part left off.
>
> I am not sure how you would do that. I am following these instructions:
> http://9track.net/pdp11/rsx4_sysgen.
>
> The trouble is that after restoring the RSX-11M+ 4.2 tape, when I reboot
> from the disk it gives repeated disk allocation errors, presumably through
> lack of space. Is there a step that needs to be added when first restoring
> the tape to the hard disk?
Not sure what errors you are seeing, but it sounds weird.
Anyway, the normal way to run M+ from an RL02 was/is to use the
pregenned system for an RL02, which has all the necessary bits stuffed
in, and everything set up. Ready to go.
Generating your own system for running on an RL02 takes some careful
consideration...
Johnny
I have a packet of five BallWriter pens, part number 40C1 06-9 (is 06-9
the date code?) if any one has a use for them they are theirs for the
postage, but as I am in the UK it might be a few dollars.
--
Dave Wade G4UGM
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
Hi!
Good news! A new batch of N8VEM SBC V2 PCBs have arrived!
In addition I just received an email from the PCB manufacturer that the
N8VEM ECB backplane PCBs have been shipped.
They should be here in a couple of days. I am guessing later this week.
Here are some instructions on how to build the N8VEM SBC V2 for the total
beginner but are useful for most any builder
http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/browse/#view=ViewFolder
<http://n8vem-sbc.pbworks.com/w/browse/#view=ViewFolder¶m=Building%20the
%20N8VEM%20for%20the%20Total%20Beginner>
¶m=Building%20the%20N8VEM%20for%20the%20Total%20Beginner
The N8VEM SBC V2 and ECB backplane are $20 each plus $2 shipping in the US
and $5 elsewhere.
Thanks and have a happy new year!
Andrew Lynch
Hi all,
I'm cleaning up the overflowing attic. Most of it will probably be rather painfully expensive to ship, so I guess it might be more for the Dutch people on this list. Some items could be shipped abroad, though.
Contact me off-list for details.
All prices listed below are exclusive of shipping costs.
Book:
UNIX Programming Environment soft cover, 15 EURO
USB KVM:
Sweex USB and Audio KVM switch for two machines, 10 EURO
PCs:
AMD XP 1900+ with Radeon x850x, 50 EURO
Compaq/HP D51s EVO, 25 EURO
Fujitsu/Siemens p300 with AHA2940 and 20GB DAT, 25 EURO
Apple:
PowerMac G4 AGP with white Apple keyboard, 25 EURO
SGI:
Indy with Indycam, original keyboard/mouse and SGI 20" CRT, 25 EURO
Sun:
GDM5410 21" Flat Trinitron CRT, 10 EURO
Ultra 5 333MHz/400MB, 15 EURO
Ultra 10 440MHz/768MB, 25 EURO
regards,
reiche
A New Year's look at another one of my classic rest home residents -
that triumph of British minimalism, the Sinclair ZX81.
http://youtu.be/YcE_HqCOTf4
Terry (Tez)
I introduced an error in a recent change to the scripts that generate
bitsavers RSS feeds for PDF and bits.
The symptoms were that the URLs for intermediate directories were
incorrect and the category for files was incorrect.
I believe I have corrected those errors and the scripts should be
working properly again.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
I have a Seagate ST-225 that I want to put into my Micro PDP-11/73. At the
moment I am just trying to see if the disk works at all and if I can format
it in a MicroVAX 2000. It spins up but the TEST 70 and TEST 71 commands fail
on it, unable to determine the type of disk. There are some jumpers for
which I have found some documentation here:
http://stason.org/TULARC/pc/hard-drives-hdd/seagate/ST225-21MB-5-25-HH-MFM-S
T412.html, but I am not sure which is pin 1, and I am not sure what settings
the MicroVAX 2000 wants, or if it needs the resistor termination pack.
Can anyone tell me which jumper settings I need for the disk to work in a
2000? And whether I need the resistor pack installed?
Thanks
Rob
On 2012-12-30 23:00, Glen Slick<glen.slick at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jerome H. Fine<jhfinedp3k at compsys.to> wrote:
>> >
>> >So the quick answer is probably that all M8190 boards are PMI capable, but
>> >the PMI is not activated if PMI memory is not present in the correct
>> >slot(s).
>> >In addition, probably all M8190 boards are happy being placed into a VT103
>> >backplane which will not support PMI activation.
>> >
>> >Of course, I can't guarantee there won't be magic smoke released if the
>> >M8190-AE
>> >is placed into a VT103 backplane.
>> >
> I remain skeptical that everything will just be fine if you place an
> M8190 KDJ11-B into a non-Q22/CD backplane.
>
> If you look at Table 2-9 (page 2-19) and Table 2-10 (page 2-20) in
> EK-KDJ1B-UG_KDJ11-B_Nov86.pdf, won't placing an M8190 into a
> non-C22/CD backplane essentially connect the CA1-CV1 signals in Table
> 2-10 straight through to the AA1-AV1 signals in Table 2-9, and same
> with the DA1-DV1 signals and the BA1-BV1 signals? That doesn't seem
> like something that would allow normal functioning.
I think you are right, Glen. The M8190 is intended to sit in a Q-CD
slot, not a Q-Q. I'd surprised if it works.
However, if you ever want to put an M8190 in a VT103 you need to rewire
the backplane anyway, as the VT103 backplane don't even do Q22 if I
remember right.
> Also, it is clear from Table 2-10 that the PMI signals on the M8190
> only exist on the top (component) side of the board and can only
> communicate over the PMI with memory boards physically located above
> the M8190.
Correct. The PMI memory for PDP-11s work in both Q-CD slots and PMI
slots, but they only perform as PMI memory if they sit above the CPU in
a Qbus backplane.
I'm not sure the PMI memory boards would work in Q-Q slots either...
Johnny
About John's design
If I understand correctly, your are using one of the newest Xcore product,
I guess, mainly for USB "full access", and this new chip is not yet
available, is it ?
Question, because your project seems very interesting to me :
Why did you chose that Xcore product, versus already available
chips like PIC 32 ?.
I am NOT a specialist about chips, but I do not see much difference between
the two,
USB speaking.
Do you take advantage of the multi-core chip ??
To me ( again, I am not a specialist, so pardon the question ) Is complexity
of multi cores
chips "justified" for that kind of interface ?
I mean architecture and compiler learning complexity balanced versus
advantages ??
Or is it just for the learning fun ;-)
Dear Mr. Watzman
I am an IMSAI 8080 owner from Switzerland.
Currently i look for an IMSAI FDC floppy system with CalComp 140 drives.
I startet my search for this floppy system several years ago, but i could never found it.
Now, i'm googling on IMSAI FDC and your name is the first result what i see.
I contact some peoples (Todd Fischer, Herb Johnson, John Monahan and Howard Harte (who never answered)) and some others.
Well, did you now who has one of these and they are willing to sell?
Thanks in Advance
Matt Schoeller
Switzerland
------------------------------
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 8:29 AM PST Al Kossow wrote:
>On 12/26/12 6:48 AM, Colin Eby wrote:
>> Al,
>>
>> I'm away for the holidays, but could have a rummage at TNMoC when I return.
>
>will do.
>
>I'm trying to work down the backlog of IBM media I have to image over the holiday break.
>One thing I noticed is getting track 0 to read correctly is picky about the controller
>used with Imagedisk. An Adaptec AHA-1522 works correctly with a National DM8473A.
>The Displaywriter supported either single or double-sided drives.
>
>
>
>
who made the drives in the DW? Are they useful for imaging with a modern pc?
In the past I successfully low-level formatted PC-formatted ST225
using XXDP2.5 directly on PDP11/53 with RQDX3.
If I remember correctly, I used ZRQCH.
As I had a machine with RX33 (5"1/4), I prepared a booting image of
XXDP on SIMH, transferred the image to floppy disk with vtserver,
then executed the diagnostic program, inserted the right parameters, and voil?.
It worked like a charm on all the ST225 I have, also on one that have
a lot of defective sectors.
Andrea
Hello ALL !
I have got an strange idea for the last day of the year ( It was time ;-) )
I am wondering about a PCI to EXTERNAL ISA interface board.
Here is what in think of :
PCI interface board INSIDE a present days PC, LINKED TO
external ISA passive backplane. ( outside of the PC )
With , ideally, as discussed before on this thread, DMA possibilities
Does it ( still ? ) exist some ***afordable*** commercial product ?
Does that has been already discussed somewhere on this forum ?
Does someone built that kind of interface , DIY way, in the past ?
Will there be restrictions on this connectivity, if the PC "reverse" ( is run ) under plain DOS
versus running DOS under Windows ??
PLS, remember that I am a new comer on this file, so I may be sligthly
out of topic in this thread. If so , my apology.
Thanks and Happy New Year Everybody !!
> At 4:19 AM +0000 12/31/12, Liam Proven wrote:
>> On 27 December 2012 15:00, William Barnett-Lewis <wlewisiii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> ? I wonder what the state of the art in Atari emulation is?
>>
>> Very good, I believe. There are various emulators for gamers which can
>> emulate different early/original models with great fidelity so that
>> you can run demos and so on - this is the main focus.
>>
>> There are also some emulators for those who wish to run desktop TOS apps.
that's more wait I want :)
>>
>> Also, x86 PC GEM itself is now GPL open-source:
>> http://www.deltasoft.com/Default.htm
>>
>> (The FreeGEM community is where I first "met" CCmper Gene Buckle.)
>>
>> There have been efforts to bring across some of the Atari
>> improvements, but development largely stalled quite a few years ago.
>>
>> On the Atari side, various people wrote replacements of various bits
>> of TOS - the VDI, the AES, the desktop and so on - and some of these
>> parts were FOSS.
>>
>> Eventually, the result was a complete FOSS Atari OS, containing almost
>> no original Atari code but highly compatible. It's called AFROS and it
>> runs best on an emulator called ARANYM, which is designed for running
>> TOS and TOS apps on PCs, rather than games.
>> http://aranym.org/
>
> Now that is seriously interesting!? I knew there was a reason I was
> keeping up with this thread!
more websites to bookmark
>
> Zane
Hello everyone!
I have a question which to some might seem rather obvious to some, but
I cannot find the answer. And guessing by my recent streak of luck
I'll probably find the answer to this question after posting the
question to the list... Nevermind, back on topic.
The question at hand: Can a PMI processor -- in this case a KDJ11-BF
-- be put into a non-PMI serpentine QBUS backplane? Or will the magic
smoke be released.
If the answer is a resounding "no". Any one here have a KDJ11-AC
(M8192-YC) they'd be willing to trade for a KDJ11-BF (M8190-AE)?
I'm also interested in some other QBUS '11 boards, a -- short -- list
follows, in order of precedence:
> DLV11-J/DLVJ1-M (M8043) -- or compatible
> QBUS (non-PMI) memory -- I'd *LOVE* to get an MSV11-QC (M7551-CA, 4MB), -QB (-BA, 2MB) or -QA (-AA, 1MB) memory board; I'd also be fine with a 256KB MSV11-LK (M8059-K*) board
> 22-bit compatible boot ROM board -- e.g. The BDV11 (M8012) revision E.
> QBUS SCSI controller -- I'm really gunning for the CMD CQD-220A/TM, though I'm for any form of QBUS SCSI controller that can be both TMSCP tape and MSCP disk controller at the same time
> DRV11-J (M8049) -- or compatible
> DHV11 (M3104) -- or compatible
> LPV11 (M8027
> DELQA (M7516) -- or compatible
I would love to get all DEC original boards -- save the SCSI
controller, as I would the system to have mostly DEC innards.
If any one can tell from that list, I'm setting up a complete PDP-11
system. In this case replacing one. Don't ask what happened to the
machine that is being replaced be cause I will go on a twenty minute
long rant consisting of nothing but swearing.
Many thanks for any help offered!
Cheers,
Christian G.