The following message is of sufficient interest to
SOL and Altair-era listers that I'm forwarding it
without asking its original poster; while perhaps
not perfect netiquette, I'm hoping the list has no
rule banning it.
-dq
From: Charles Eicher <ceicher(a)inav.net>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Wanted: old Sun5 keyboard for Sol-20 restoration parts
Date: 5 Mar 2002 13:31:26 -0800
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <a63dfe0101p(a)drn.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-479.newsdawg.com
X-Newsreader: Direct Read News 2.91
Path:
news.iglou.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!nycmny1-snh1
.gtei.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!wn2feed!
wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!209.155.233.17!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp
.newsguy.com!drn
Xref: news-incoming.iglou.com alt.folklore.computers:264561
I am searching for keyboard parts for restoration of a vintage microcomputer,
my
Sol-20. In some recent research, I've learned that the Sun5 keyboard contains
the type of keyboard contact pads that are used in the Sol. I've found a place
that will sell used Sun5 keyboards for $15 plus shipping, but I figure
somebody
in the alt.folklore.computers readership might have an old Sun5 keyboard
sitting
around they might part with cheaply, since this is for a good cause.
I haven't torn apart my Sol kbd yet, but it is well known that this keyboard
used foam contact pads that deteriorated with age, so most Sol CPUs function
but
cannot be used because there's no keyboard input. You can replace the foam
pads
and they keyboard will work, but the trick is finding the pads. There are many
Keytronics keyboards that use these foam pads, but I've been unable to locate
any on the local surplus market. I should be able to pick this up cheaper than
$15+shipping, but it looks like I'll have to order a used Sun5 kbd and it will
set me back $25. All this for $0.50 worth of foam pads that I could
cannibalize
>from a scrap $2 keyboard...IF I could find the right keyboard. The sole vendor
of Sol kbd restoration parts has disappeared, I heard he's having financial
difficulty. Bummer.
So if anyone has a spare Sun5 keyboard, or other keyboard that might contain
suitable foam-pad parts for cannibalization, please email me at
ceicher(a)inav.net
and I will be eternally grateful. My Sol will be happy too.
What exactly would I use a DRV11-J card for? I'm thinking of selling it
since it seems to bring fairly decent prices on the 'net, but I want to make
sure I wouldn't actually NEED the thing before I sell it.
Thanks!
Nathan
--
----------------------------------------------
Homepage: http://tarsi.binhost.combinHOST.com: http://www.binhost.com
Forever Beyond: http://www.foreverbeyond.org
----------------------------------------------
I need to find a good email/web hosting service. Yes, this is on-topic.
Right now, subatomix.com (my mail server) is a machine in my house,
connected via residential cable modem service. This has some cool factor
for me, but there are disadvantages:
(0) The system has to up and stable 24/7; I can't play with it in ways
that might interrupt that.
(1) The cable modem connection goes down every now and then, sometimes for
several hours.
(2) I'm not too knowledgeable at mail administration; there's a good
probability that this machine is not as secure as it could be.
On top of that stuff, a credible source inside the cable company says that
I will be eventually switched over from RoadRunner to the cable company's
own network. According to the source, areas where the switches are
occurring (mostly those served by @Home, but RoadRunner is next) are
experiencing repeated, prolonged outages.
So I need list members' recommendations on a good email/web hosting
service. If you work for such a service, feel free to suggest it if it is
a good service. What I want is:
(0) Email hosting for 5 addresses at subatomix.com. It needs to handle
several hundred emails per day (peak) and the occasional large file mailed
to me.
(1) Web hosting for my as-yet-unfinished personal web site. The largest
part of the site will be an exposition of my collection like that of many
others here. I plan on having a lot of pictures, and the service needs
the capacity to hold them. (See it *is* on-topic).
(2) Encrypted communications, or at least my passwords not sent over the
network in cleartext.
(3) The servers running some UNIX and administered by competent people.
(4) A flat fee.
(5) If I use their DNS servers, the ability to point foo.subatomix.com to
a certain IP address.
--
Jeffrey S. Sharp
jss(a)subatomix.com
On Mar 5, 22:03, Ernest wrote:
> I didn't know that Mostek made an entire system? There is one at REPC
that
> someone dropped off. It has two 8" drives, and has a yellow and blue
case.
> It looks like an early vintage system but I don't know much about it. Is
> anyone familiar with this computer?
Not first hand, but I have a book called "Microcomputer Board Data Manual",
edited by Dave Bursky, from "Electronic Design", pub. Hayden 1978. It
lists one Mostek product, the OEM-80, about which the summary says:
Word size: 8-bit data / 16-bit address
CPU: MK3880
Clock freq min 0.005MHz / max 2.5MHz
Total addressable memory 64K
Amount of RAM on card 4K provided / 64K possible
Amount of ROM on card 0K provided / 25K possible
DMA capable: yes
Bus type : proprietary
Parallel I/O pins: 40
Serial I/O ports: 1
Max baud rate: 9600
Interrupt provisions: [none]
Multiprocessing capablitly: yes
Counter/timers: 4 (16 bits/timer)
Software: assembler, debugging, HLL, OS
Supply voltages: +5V, +/- 12V
Board sixe: 12"x 8.5"
Comments: Same as Z-80 CPU. ROM and RAM address mapping. OEM-80: No ROM
supplied. Available as a complete ROM-based prototype package. European
card: 233 x 250mm.
The chapter (well, one page plus a 1-page diagram) in the body of the book
says the SDB-80 is the version with the firmware, and there are some other
cards as well, including floppy controller, more RAM, PROM programmer, CRT
interface, card cage, etc. The OEM-80 cost $430 in 100+ quantities.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Donzelli [mailto:aw288@osfn.org]
> Who else wanted a DECwriter, and where?
I have one spoken for, in Champaign, IL. That might be out of your
way from (or to) Chicago, though. I'm not sure.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On Mar 5, 18:14, Brian Chase wrote:
> OpenSTEP proper was just the last generation
> of NeXTSTEP. The latest release I saw being OpenSTEP 4.2. It ran on
> Intel/PC, Sun Sparc, and I think PA-RISC. I believe NeXTSTEP 3.3 was
> the last version to support NeXT black hardware.
Then how come my NeXT slab came with CDs labelled "OpenStep 4.2 for
NeXT, User Disk", "OpenStep 4.2 for NeXT, Developer", and and NeXT boot
floppy? :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> > If you say Richard Head you will get one virtual nerf brick
> > tossed in your direction immediately...
>
> Well, it isn't the notorious R. Head, but the Nerf bricks
> will likely fly anyway.
>
> The very first computer operator was Eve, with an Apple at one hand
> and a Wang at the other.
...and some would say they still can't get the smell out of the Apples...
;)
On March 6, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> That actually makes sense, too. Just the other day in the USA Today, I
> read that the old US Embassy in Afghanistan was equipped with old
> Wangs.
Are you suggesting that the embassy is staffed by a bunch of
dickheads?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> From: William Donzelli [mailto:aw288@osfn.org]
> Subject: Re: Decwriters
>
>
> > I can arrange to pick up at the Denver stop... it's only 5
> hours' drive from
> > here.
>
> Who else wanted a DECwriter, and where?
>
> William Donzelli
> aw288(a)osfn.org
>
I could use an R key for a LA-36 (Decwrite II)! Long story involving wife
and an errant vacuum. (But honey.... It was soooooo dusty!)
Gary
************************************
If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the
delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may
contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not
copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and
kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this
message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by
nor attributable to ITT.
************************************
I need a Shugart 851 8" floppy drive manual. Does anyone have one that
hey'll loan me or make a copy of it for me? Or does anyone have a pointer
to an on-line copy?
I have a bunch of 851 drives and I need to see how to configure them to
use in place of Shugart 800 drives.
Joe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
> B) OpenSTEP was never the graphics subsystem of NeXTSTEP, as I had
> thought.
Well, if you take the graphical subsystem, make it run on top of X11,
and ad a little more of NeXT to it, then you would get OpenStep. :)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
> > Doc, I think maybe you're confusing OpenStep with
> OpenWindows (OpenLook),
> Nope. I've used OpenWindows, hate it, would rather run twm
> if that's
> the only choice. I may be completely out of my head, and as of this
Heh. I'm running out of "OpenStuff" :)
> morning I can't even find the stack of old source archives.
> If it's on
> tape I'm gonna cry "Uncle".
I don't suppose you might have seen the Mach version of OpenStep
running on Intel hardware? This would look pretty similar to a "linux"
if you were using a command-line shell.
> enough to work
> > with at that point. I ended up deleting everything but the window
> > manager. :)
> I've fooled with GNUSTEP myself, with the same results you got.
> WindowMaker is a great WM, but I begin to doubt that GNUSTEP will ever
> get any closer than that to a full-blown environment. Gnome
> & KDE have
> pulled all the focus and resources away.
That's a shame, since the NeXT environment is much nicer. :) Of course,
OpenStep on its own would still leave the problem of using X11 for
delivery of all graphics, which from what I've seen is nowhere near as
nice as the NeXT window system, but still it would have been a step in
the right direction.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Chase [mailto:vaxzilla@jarai.org]
> Much better
> > than those poor, bloated pieces of garbage that GNOME, KDE,
> Enlightenment,
> > etc, have become.
> Now I'm no big fan of any of the newer window managers either, but
> OpenLook? GAH, ARGHHH *WRETCH* Sure, it's a personal preference and
> all. My choice would be FVWM, and then probably TWM. Also, I'd
> completely forgetten about Bowman and AfterSTEP. Bowman was nice and
> lightweight, and I think derivative of FVWM.
Heh. I don't remember whether Bowman was FVWM derived or not, but
everything else was at the time, so why not? :) Actually, I wish
Enlightenment was still based on FVWM -- it would be much easier on the
CPU.
Anyway, yes, it's a personal preference, but I certainly like it better
than GNOME or KDE (since it will actually _run_ on a machine without
flooring a 200Mhz chip. There are one or two other "desktop
environments" for linux, but those never impressed me.
... so if you want an entire "environment" (that is, window management,
supporting apps, maybe a file manager, and if you're lucky a decent
set of widgets, all of which interoperate and share data nicely), what
other choice is there? (I would seriously like to know. Private
mail is fine, since most of this software is probably off topic :)
Personally, I use WindowMaker for window management, and don't bother
looking for "supporting apps," etc.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
> near certain that what I have is an X11 window manager named OpenSTEP.
> I've used GNUSTEP, AfterSTEP, and their nephew WindowMaker. All cool,
> but not what I was referring to.
Doc, I think maybe you're confusing OpenStep with OpenWindows (OpenLook),
which was a SUN environment, and is, in fact, relatively well replicated
on linux. In fact, I'd say that byte-for-byte it's the most complete,
useable desktop environment available under Linux today. Much better
than those poor, bloated pieces of garbage that GNOME, KDE, Enlightenment,
etc, have become.
...but it's not OpenStep. It's neither as elegant nor as complete as the
NeXT environment, IMO. It's also not as pretty ;)
Actually, WindowMaker is the "official" window management component of
the GNUStep project. It's a (small, but visible) subset of GNUStep, in
other words, and not separate.
GNUStep consists of lots of UI libraries, supporting utilities (or it
should have those by now, rather -- I haven't checked in a while), and
misc. other stuff. All of that, when coupled with the window manager
should eventually give one an environment which is source compatible
with OpenStep on other platforms.
It's unfortunate that the project isn't further along. (finished!) I
tried to compile the whole of GNUStep (all that was available) for
Linux several years ago, and there wasn't anywhere near enough to work
with at that point. I ended up deleting everything but the window
manager. :)
I may try again soon.
There's another NeXT like WM named Bowman, on which AfterStep is based.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
It was a joke, Chad. You know...a joke?
-Dave
On March 6, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> It wasn't staffed at all.
>
> Chad Fernandez
> Michigan, USA
>
> Dave McGuire wrote:
> >
> > On March 6, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> > > That actually makes sense, too. Just the other day in the USA Today, I
> > > read that the old US Embassy in Afghanistan was equipped with old
> > > Wangs.
> >
> > Are you suggesting that the embassy is staffed by a bunch of
> > dickheads?
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> > --
> > Dave McGuire
> > St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
>
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
> I didn't think I ever seen it all the way through. What does it have to
> do with railways and highways?
Highways were promoted as routes for buses to travel,
smoke-emitting buses that replaced clean electric
trolleys that ran on rail tracks... and this actually
happened not just in L.A. but all over the country.
-dq
> Is it possible to fall in love with a cartoon :-)
Many of us probably resemble that remark!
-dq
This was actually supposed to go straight to Dan. Sorry :)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Smith
> Ok, so how much does Insight cost? Will they panic if I tell them I
> don't have windows, and no, it's not a Macintosh either? ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wright [mailto:dtwright@uiuc.edu]
> I was just switched from @Home to my local cable company's (insight
> communications) network, and it's actual been more stable and
> reliable then it
> was before. @Home kind of sucked, but I've been happy with
> insight's service,
> at least so far -- it's been about a month...
Ok, so how much does Insight cost? Will they panic if I tell them I
don't have windows, and no, it's not a Macintosh either? ;)
Do they require you to buy cable service too, or can you get the
network hookup separately?
I have been considering switching to cable off and on, myself.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
>On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:43:31PM -0500, Jeff Hellige wrote:
>[snip]
>> This could partly be due to Apple giving it away to NeXT hardware
>> owners in '99.
>
>You happen to have any idea how this was done? Public FTP, shipped CDs
>or some other form? I'm looking for a NeXTstep release; vendors only
>seem to ship OpenStep these days (if at all; it's been a while since
>I contacted one).
>
>--
>Sune Stjerneby <sst(a)vmunix.dk>
> - Part of an RFC 1876-compliant network.
It was done by shipping CDs. Owners of NeXT hardware were to contact
Apple (via telephone, fax, or e-mail, I think) with their machine serial
number (supposedly also software serial number, but that turned out not
to be required), and request the Y2K patches. Since those patches were
only applicable to NS3.3 or OS4.2, you would also get NS3.3 or OS4.2,
if you requested them. (I believe that if you had anything less than
OS4.0, you would get NS3.3; if you had OS4.0 or OS4.1, you would get
OS4.2. I also believe that you could get as many copies as
you had machine serial numbers. I am not certain of either of these
last two points.)
Some of these software packages appear for auction or sale in various
venues--or, that is what I assume they are, when they are advertised as
brand new, and including the Y2K patches. (There was at least one bug
introduced by the Y2K patches, but I don't think that a fix has been
released. It had to do with an unfortunate interaction between gnutar
and some (or one) of the Lighthouse Design programs.)
PB Schechter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sune Stjerneby [mailto:sst@vmunix.dk]
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:43:31PM -0500, Jeff Hellige wrote:
> [snip]
> > This could partly be due to Apple giving it away to NeXT hardware
> > owners in '99.
> You happen to have any idea how this was done? Public FTP, shipped CDs
> or some other form? I'm looking for a NeXTstep release; vendors only
> seem to ship OpenStep these days (if at all; it's been a while since
> I contacted one).
http://www.blackholeinc.com/ (I think)
Black Hole sells new, licensed copies of NeXTSTEP in several releases.
They're a little steep on those, but they have them.
I have no connection with Black Hole, other than that I think I'll order
a cable and mouse from them. :)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> *never* heard VMS
> > mentioned as having any sort of an OPENSTEP environment.
> We are talking about OpenSTEP, right? Not NeXTSTEP? There has
> been a port of OpenSTEP to XFree86 for long and long.
Yes. Right. Nope. :)
That is, GNUStep is far from OpenSTEP. It is still a work in
progress, and while it has a very nice NeXT like window manager
for X11, it's not a complete OpenSTEP environment by any means.
It's also not a port, but a re-implementation from specs.
What I am talking about would be a port -- of OpenSTEP (not
NeXTSTEP), to VMS on Alpha. (There is a FAQ somewhere that
explains OpenSTEP vs. NeXTSTEP [vs. NeXTStep...)
In a nutshell, I believe that NeXTStep refers to a subset of
NeXTSTEP licensed to IBM at one point. NeXTSTEP is the full
original NeXT environment. OpenStep was modularized, and the
operating system functions were separated from the user
environment, which was then ported to other platforms (including
Windows [ISTR] and Solaris, and, so I have heard recently, VMS)
Of course, that is mostly from memory, so any of it could be way
off.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
I have just acquired part of a DECdatasystem 570. I have the following
questions about it: Why did DEC repackage their PDP-11s this way? When
were the various DECdatasystem models released? How do they fit in with
the rest of DEC's product line, and how were they marketed?
--
Jeffrey S. Sharp
jss(a)subatomix.com
> I got thinking about this on my way to work today. If this has indeed
> been going on for the last 50 years as Allison said, this makes sense.
> It was in the 50's that our highway system was laid down.... I think
> I-94 went through hear in 1957. Also, since the mid 70's (??) much of
> our manufacturing has gone overseas.
I suggest you watch the movie "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" again,
this time, keeping in mind that's its not fiction, but allegory...
-dq