Greetings,
Is anyone here familiar with modifying an IBM 4701-1 to do anything
useful other than its intended purpose of connecting bank terminals to
a mainframe? Given that it has a floppy drive (8"), memory and a CPU,
and has the capability to load some sort of software, there must be
some use for it, such as a dedicated controller of some sort. It came
with some small Apricot displays but no keyboards.
--
R. D. Davis
rdd(a)perqlogic.com Be careful what you wish for --- you
http://www.perqlogic.com/rdd may get your wish ...and it might not
Tel: (410) 744-4900 be what you were expecting.
<Anybody have a favorite? Why?
Vt340 (color! dual session via two serial ports)
Vt1200 (Xterm LAT, TCPIP or DCE, multisession)
Vt100 (still the best tube around)
Vt320 (smaller Vt100!)
vt220 (small)
H19 (my first CRT, also supports 19.2k without xon/xoff)
in that order. Experience and the fact that they have the commonality of
VT52/VT100 capability. The Vt340 has color so that makes it somewhat
special. The remainder I like for Network connectivity (vt1200), keyboard
(vt100), Display (VT320) orsize (vt320, 220). They all have printer ports
and on screen programming.
Allison
Posting this on behalf of Matthew, please contact him directly if you're
interested in any of this stuff.
----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Saxby <saxby(a)vossnet.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 11:08 PM
Subject: Another loaf of free stuff!
> Sorry, for those of us in the UK only. Just come and pick up from Slough,
> Bucks, England.
>
> IBM AT
> 6 CGA Cube type monitors for the AT
> Plus, a load of RM 186 machines.
>
>
> If they aren't collected by next Friday, then they will go in the skip...
> So,
> someone please take them.
>
>
> ---
> Matthew
TTFN - Pete.
--
Hardware & Software Engineer. Sound Engineer.
Collector of Arcade Machines, Games Consoles & Obsolete Computers (esp DEC)
peter.pachla(a)wintermute.org.uk |
peter.pachla(a)vectrex.freeserve.co.uk |
peter.pachla(a)virgin.net |
peter.pachla(a)wintermute.free-online.co.uk | www.wintermute.free-online.co.uk
--
Greetings,
While trying to make my Sun 4/110 bootable again, I ran into a slight
problem with Seagate's web page: their documentation for older drives,
such as the jumper info., is somewhat undecipherable for someone using
UNIX... perhaps it's readable by MS-DOS/Windows systems, not sure.
Can anyone kindly tell me which jumpers on the ST4766N and ST41200N
drives are which? I think both are identical as far as jumpering for
SCSI ID, etc. goes. At one time, I had this info., but have misplaced
it, and need to change SCSI IDs and also get the drive to spin up by
itself with no delay.
BTW, can anyone tell me what format their web page us using to display
the info? Does Microsoft windows use some sort of unusual ASCII?
--
R. D. Davis
rdd(a)perqlogic.com Be careful what you wish for --- you
http://www.perqlogic.com/rdd may get your wish ...and it might not
Tel: (410) 744-4900 be what you were expecting.
Tony Duell wrote:
> But I am
>suggesting that _everyone_ here is intellegent enough to understand a
>book on electrical wiring and then to do such wiring themselves.
As a recent perpetrator of some particularly egregious stupidity
(everyone *did* get their resistor color-codes straightened out after that,
right?) I can claim that intelligence and the advisability of any single
isolated act may not necessarily be corellated. (I can hope, anyway.)
I therefore have a minor suggestion to make here. Call it
"Solderpooling". Anyone intent on reworking mains power, moving full-height
racks, or otherwise dealing with lethal quantities of energy, at least for
the first time, put out an announcement and invitation here. If there is
another local list member, arrange a visit for the duration of the risky
part. We tend to do this for moving big stuff anyway, but I'm proposing it
also for rewiring houses, repairing monitors, gluing with sodium cyanide
(!), etc.
Two pairs of eyes looking at the same procedure are much more
likely to catch errors than one, even if neither is a "trained
professional" (or proficient amateur). Add to that the psychological desire
to do things properly in front of a visitor vs. taking short-cuts by one's
self and the liklihood of mistakes might really go down.
There's also the pleasant prospect of a shared victory if whatever
it is works and the unpleasant but comforting availability of someone to do
CPR if it *really* doesn't work.
- Mark
At 07:56 PM 10/09/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>While trying to make my Sun 4/110 bootable again, I ran into a slight
>problem with Seagate's web page: their documentation for older drives,
>such as the jumper info., is somewhat undecipherable for someone using
>UNIX... perhaps it's readable by MS-DOS/Windows systems, not sure.
>Can anyone kindly tell me which jumpers on the ST4766N and ST41200N
>drives are which? I think both are identical as far as jumpering for
One of the best places to get drive info is
http://www.thetechpage.com (formerly blue-planet.com)
They just happen to have your drives listed!
(Hey Stan - point the guy in the right direction and let him do the work!)
Lance Costanzo http://www.webhighrise.com
System Administrator Website and Virtual Domain Hosting
lance(a)costanzo.net starting at $5/month, no setup fees
The backplanes having more than 8 ISA slots tended to work badly, as a
function of how full and how long they were. Notable exceptions are/were
the 12-slot passive backplanes sold by at least one manufacturer, which
managed to operate quite well. The key is that these were not on a
motherboard and thereby allowed, among other things, placement of the main
CPU close to the center of the backplane while the remaining cards were
installed working inward from the ends.
These things have always been ridiculously expensive due to the low volumes
in which they're produced.
There were a few expansion boxes built with a cable having a bus interface
at each end, capable of converting the differential signals on the cable
betwen them back to single-ended TTL levels. These didn't ever work
particularly well, i.e. were very fussy about what was in the expansion
chassis, as the bus timing was altered by the cable delays.
I wouldn't expect such an item to be low-priced, though, just because of its
relative rarity.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Fritzler <mid(a)auk.cx>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, October 09, 1999 12:07 PM
Subject: ISA expansion boards/cases
>
>Is there a good place to find boards that plug into a 16bit ISA slot and
>let you have another 8 or so slots? (without building your own)
>
>I would think there'd be a fair number of these floating around now that
>ISA is nearly dead in the mainstream, but aparently not. The
>cheapest I saw one new for $496. Bit ridiculous, imho.
>
>All I need is both end-boards (host end and backplane end) and a
>backplane. (I certainly don't need anymore cases...)
>
>Can anyone help?
>
>af
>
>---
> Adam Fritzler
> { mid(a)auk.cx, afritz(a)iname.com}
> http://www.auk.cx/~mid/
> "Something in my systray is blinking wildly." -- DS
>
>Much to my surprise I was contacted by someone still maintaining several
>PDP-11/55's running DOS/BATCH. Yes, I know I shouldn't have been
>surprised, just never heard of anyone actually running it. Anyway, does
>anyone know of a way, or have a program to transfer data between the PDP-11
>and a laptop? I'm not aware of a DOS/BATCH version of Kermit, which was my
>first thought.
Which way does the data have to flow? If from the -11 to the PC,
and the data is all simple ASCII, you can just send it out the
serial port without any flow control or error detection/correction.
If it's anything more complicated, I just boot RT-11 and use FILEX
(aka COPY/DOS) to move information back and forth to the DOS-11
packs/tapes, then I use Kermit-RT or TCP/IP on the RT-11 system for
data transfer.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Some pictures from VCF 3.0.\
http://members.xoom.com/icwhen/shows/vcf/1999/
Official VCF pictures will be posted to the VCF website wthin a week or
so.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
VCF East? VCF Europe!? YOU BETCHA!!
Stay tuned for more information
or contact me to find out how you can participate
http://www.vintage.org
For those who have not heard of this particular recent project, I'm trying
to disassemble the 2K controller ROM in a Commodore D9060 IEEE-4888 hard disk.
Inside the box are a C= board with two 6502s, shared RAM, an IEEE interface
and a SASI interface. The drive mechanism is a Tandon TM602S (5Mb, D9060)
or TM603S (7.5M, D9090). In between is an OMTI 25011 SASI host adapter.
I'm attempting to understand the ROMs enough to either change the drive
geometry to something like an ST-225 (since they are so plentiful) or to
complete the code on the "DOS board", as it's called, to issue SCSI-1 commands
and drive an old 40Mb-200Mb drive at the limit of the Commodore DOS 3.0
physical size (~16Mb, IIRC).
To that end, an understanding of the OMTI would be essential. Does anyone
out there have docs? I have (badly blurred) copies of the schematics, but
no software info. I particularly need to know reads, writes, sense packets
and formatting packets as the OMTI implements them. Most important is to
learn how reduced write current and write precomp cylinders are set. If it's
a command, then that's easy to change. If the OMTI makes assumptions, then
it's not so easy.
I now know where in the code the drive geometry is set; I just don't know
how to affect RWC and precomp, even if I do patch the number of heads and
cylinders.
Thanks,
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Since it appears no one can rescue the CDC 9766 drives, I've begun
stripping some bits from one of them (removed one board set already)
and am preparing to remove the PSU during lunch or my next break. Now
then, as time may be in somewhat short supply, can anyone give kindly
me any hints for the easiest way to do this? Noticing the screws in
the side of the slide-out rack, I'm wondering if removing the two
screws on each side will remove it. There also appears to be an
air-hose (used to cool the PSU?) that will have to come off. Is there
some way to eaasily just disconnect the sliding mechanism without
removing the screws? It also looks as though there's some sort of
braided wire (wires?) going into the PSU with no connector that can be
disconencted... blast... the one thing I've misplaced was my
wirecutters, which I, hopefully, won't need.
Any other suggestions for removing any other easily removeable bits
(heads, motor?)?
How do I lift the lid on this drive to access the front panel switches
to remove the switches and light-bulbs? (sorry for the unhackish
question, but time's a bit short).
--
R. D. Davis
rdd(a)perqlogic.com Be careful what you wish for --- you
http://www.perqlogic.com/rdd may get your wish ...and it might not
Tel: (410) 744-4900 be what you were expecting.
Much to my surprise I was contacted by someone still maintaining several
PDP-11/55's running DOS/BATCH. Yes, I know I shouldn't have been
surprised, just never heard of anyone actually running it. Anyway, does
anyone know of a way, or have a program to transfer data between the PDP-11
and a laptop? I'm not aware of a DOS/BATCH version of Kermit, which was my
first thought.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
>Mark game me this board because he didn't know what it was, and he wasn't
>interested in it. If it is what I think it is, it's probably pretty rare.
>It has 4 large Xlinx chips on it, a smaller Xlinx chip, a MC68020, and a lot
>of glue logic. It's made by Micro Technology, Inc, copyrighted 1990, and the
>sticker reads "CIQBA +". The only connector coming off the board is a small
>10-pin connector like the one on a DLV11J. It looks like it's a Q-Bus
>CI (Computer Interconnect) board, Is this right?
Yes, it is.
> Anyone have more info
>on this? Web search turned up nothing useful...
Simply put, you plug the board into your Q-bus VAX, cable it
to your HSC/HSD/HSZ/star coupler, install MTI's PQDRIVER,
set up the MTI and VAXCLUSTER license PAKs, and you're on the air!
If you don't have a HSC/HSD/HSZ/star coupler, you don't have much need
for the CIQBA, do you? :-)
Tim.
I have a TS)3 and a long 19" dual width interface backplane filled with flip
chip modules. I know nothing about it other than I got it 10 years ago in
mint condition.
#1) Is it Unibus or Omnibus or ????
#2) Any idea how to hook it up.. (there are a few slots free at the end of
the plane obviously for cables).
Any help would be appreciated as I have been waiting for docs for the last
10 years.
<From: Charles Oblender <charlesII(a)nwonline.net>
<To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers" <classiccmp(a)u.washingto
<Subject: Have any info?
**** LARGE SNIPPAGE...
That was really an ill informed thing to do. I just got (likely the rest
of the list too) a 313kb file! Or better said you spammed the group. Not
all of us have the ability to view it or the patience to download it!
I'd suggest next time finding a web page to post it too next time rather
than filling everyones disks.
Allison
On Oct 8, 8:46, John Foust wrote:
> > I paid just short of $200.00 for one on eBay about six months ago.
I'm
> glad
> >it's paid for itself.
>
> At first I thought you were pulling my leg. Maybe you are.
> Then I searched eBay.
Well, maybe my reaction was a little OTT, but some of these things are
fairly hard to come by. I'd like the Hardware Handbook for it's content,
but I know others collect things like CDs and T-shirts for other reasons.
Most such things arn't all that hard to find, though, unless you're
looking for a particular item to complete a "set".
I guess now Acorn Copmputers has been broken up, I could sell all those
teddy bears and sweatshirts to pay for things I really want:-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Does anyone here have docs for either the RH10 Massbus interface, or the
DF10 data channel? I'm trying to wing it from the ITS/TOPS-10 source, and
it's being more confusing than anything.
Scanned docs would be really nice ^_^
-------
Well, the pdp8/e power sord was cut off, but there is a 2 foot long hunk of
wire. I suppose I'll just wire up a power connector, and they use a good
quality extension cable (someday). No rush on that...
The core memory planes were removed, of course. Looks like there were at
least 3 sets of core in this at one time. The foam along the side of the
case has pretty much vaporized and is all over the bus connectors. Whats
the general consensus (yeah right, on THIS mailing list i was a consensus...)
about removing versis replacing that foam?
And one front panel switch is gone, and another is present but broken. The
rest at least appear to click up/down properly.
Boards that were in my PDP8/e when I recieved it
===============================================
M8330
M837
M8655
M8360
M8350
VG DS (dont know the number)
M8655
M840
M849
M8310 Loose
M8300 Loose
G111 Loose. 2 of these
G233 Loose. 3 of these (too bad they didnt leave the core planes)
M935 2 of these, to connect the second bus
VG DS 505
VG DS 102
VG DS 101
VG DS 504
M8320
M847 YH Bootstrap Loader (32 words implemented via an array of diodes)
Greetings,
There are four CDC 9766 disk-pack drives in need of rescue in the BWI
Airport area in Maryland... I'm not sure how long they'll be
available... hours or days, but if anyone's interested I think they
can be had for whatever the scrap buyer's going to pay, which probably
isn't very much. As more details become available, I'll post them.
Until recently, these drives were working and in service, as far as I
know.
While I'd love to collect these drives, I don't have room for them at
this time; for those who aren't familiar with them, they're rather
large and heavy; bigger than the DEC disk pack drives I've seen.
You'll need a large, U-haul type truck to move them. There's no
loading platform, so getting them up the ramp without a lift or winch
won't be easy (not something I'd want to attempt).
If no one can save them, I'll see what I can extract and save from
their insides.
--
R. D. Davis
rdd(a)perqlogic.com Be careful what you wish for --- you
http://www.perqlogic.com/rdd may get your wish ...and it might not
Tel: (410) 744-4900 be what you were expecting.
>Just to legitmise this email with some semi-Classic discussion, how much
>would the base unit of Compaq 486/33m with 8Mb be worth now? A friend is
>interested in buying and I was thinking of a price around ?20. Is this
>reasonable? Remember that this is the base unit ONLY, it doesn't have a
>keyboard, CD-ROM, or monitor.
I found mine in a dumpster. I think it's collectible as an early example
(perhaps the first?) of EISA. The ram is probably on-board the CPU card, so
the only component with any commercial value would be the hard drive.
Hans
Hi, John.
On Oct 7, 12:53, John Foust wrote:
> Subject: SGI Hardware Developer Handbooks available
>
> I've got two of these available at no charge to anyone who wants them.
> They describe the pin-outs, etc. of the internal and external connectors
> of the SGI line from the 4D through the rest of the line up to about
1995.
> They're about an inch thick, spiral-bound.
My goodness, I'd *kill* for one of those! I've been wanting to build a
board for an Indy for ages (I could do it for an R3000 Indogo instead,
though, if the book doesn't go that "new")... The only problem is, I'm in
the UK. Could you send one if I sent you a few dollar bills to cover US
Postal Service "Global Priority Flat Rate Envelope"?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Maybe you could offer them here first.
Francois
>Not only that, I have rare Amiga t-shirts - the first Amiga
>wake party t-shirt, baseball caps, sweat shirts, NewTek shirts.
>Sheesh. Off to the basement.
>
>- John
>
>
--- John Honniball <John.Honniball(a)uwe.ac.uk> wrote:
> Well, I went from Bristol, UK to Dayton, Ohio (via Boston)
> in order to visit a junk emporium and buy:
>
> NIXIE TUBES!!!!
Mendelssons? (They are 90 minutes from my house ;-)
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
I wanted the winners of the first VCF Computer Faire to be recognized, so
here is the list. I plan to put up a web page listing the winners along
with a photo of each exhibitor in front of their exhibit. I hope to have
it up within a couple weeks.
Note to any exhibitors reading this: we'll be getting ribbons for all 2nd
and 3rd place winners, as well as the 1st place winners who didn't get a
ribbon (because we ran out :) We at the VCF felt everyone who placed
should get recognition for putting in the effort to help make the exhibit
the success it was. I'll be contacting all exhibitors by e-mail to get
your address in about a week or so.
The exhibits were fantastic! I hope more people will participate next
year.
CLASS AWARDS
Class Home-brew, kit, or educational - Any vintage
==================================================
Best in Class
#10
Heathkit Educational Robots
Jim Willing
2nd in Class
#6
Single Plywood Computer
Dwight Elvey
3rd in Class
#3
Conway's Game of Life
Dave Dameron
Manufatured Microcomputer - Pre 1981
====================================
Best in Class
#4
IBM 5100 Model B2
Wayne Smith
2nd in Class
#9
Altair 8800 TimeShared BASIC
Jim Willing
3rd in Class
#29
Atari 800
Larry Anderson
Manufactured Microcomputer - Post 1981
======================================
Best in Class
#13
East German Computers
Hans Franke
2nd in Class
#40
The Complete Canon Cat
John Bumgarner
3rd in Class
#28
Northstar Advantage
Shawn Neely
Mini-Computer or larger system - Any vintage
============================================
Best in Class
#26
DEC GT40
Eric Smith
2nd in Class
#24
PDP-8/E running FOCAL-8
Chuck McManis
3rd in Class
#39
The AT&T 3B2-300 Desktop Powerhouse
Richard Harrington
Other
=====
Best in Class
#14
Realtime Software Bench Testing
Michael Kan
2nd in Class
#19
Marchant ACR8M Calculator (Calculator Exhibit)
Derek Peschel
3rd in Class
#32
Analog Computers of the 1960s
Douglas Coward
SPECIAL AWARDS
Best Presentation
=================
Research
#13
East German Computers
Hans Franke
Completeness
#4
IBM 5100 Model B2
Wayne Smith
Display
#35
The IMSAI Dollhouse
Todd Fisher
Creative Integration with Contemporary Technology
#33
Relay Electromechanical Computer
David Witherell
Best Preservation
=================
Original Condition
#37
Evolution of the Macintosh
Paul Zurakowski
Restoration
#24
PDP-8/E running FOCAL-8
Chuck McManis
Recreation
#12
MUNIAC
John
Zabolitzky
Simulation
#7
CMOS uP & Homebrew Forth
Tom Belpasso
Obscurity
#3
Conway's Game of Life
Dave Dameron
Best Technology
===============
Analog
#32
Analog Computers of the 1960s
Douglas Coward
Non-Electronic
#19
Marchant ACR8M Calculator (Calculator Exhibit)
Derek Peschel
People's Choice
===============
#37
Evolution of the Macintosh
Paul Zurakowski
BEST OF SHOW
#13
East German Computers
Hans Franke
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
VCF East? VCF Europe!? YOU BETCHA!!
Stay tuned for more information
or contact me to find out how you can participate
http://www.vintage.org
On Oct 7, 22:44, Pete Turnbull wrote:
...a message he should have sent to the original author, not the list.
Apologies for the noise.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I've got two of these available at no charge to anyone who wants them.
They describe the pin-outs, etc. of the internal and external connectors
of the SGI line from the 4D through the rest of the line up to about 1995.
They're about an inch thick, spiral-bound.
- John
--- Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu> wrote:
> Does anyone know how many memory bits are in a Mostek MK4027N? Its
> also labelled S7748A.
>
> I'm guessing its either 4K x 1, or 16K x 1, which would mean the
> pdp8/a memory board I have is either the 32K or 128K model.
AFAIK, it's 4Kx1. The 128K board is hex-wide because it uses the fifth
edge for extra address bits (along with the KT8A for control).
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
The MK4027 is a 4K-bit DRAM organized as 4Kx1.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 12:53 PM
Subject: Mostek MK4027N
>Does anyone know how many memory bits are in a Mostek MK4027N? Its
>also labelled S7748A.
>
>I'm guessing its either 4K x 1, or 16K x 1, which would mean the
>pdp8/a memory board I have is either the 32K or 128K model. I suppose
>it could be 2K x 1 as well (there are only 3 ram sizes for this
>board).
>
>-Lawrence LeMay
>
Does anyone know how many memory bits are in a Mostek MK4027N? Its
also labelled S7748A.
I'm guessing its either 4K x 1, or 16K x 1, which would mean the
pdp8/a memory board I have is either the 32K or 128K model. I suppose
it could be 2K x 1 as well (there are only 3 ram sizes for this
board).
-Lawrence LeMay
Your comments are interesting and probably correct, but I think you've
missed the point. What I wanted to address is the problem of deciding which
features to put into a tool and which ones to leave out.
The issue of host speed is interesting, except that it really doesn't matter
whether it can emulate the S-100 system's processor at 15 times its normal
rate or 2500 times its normal rate. The interface is bandwidth limited by
design to 2 MHz updates. I've contemplated a FIFO of some sort, but since
the S-100 can be operated in bursts or in loops at an arbitrarily high speed
anyway, I doubt there's a need for a FIFO.
What boards there were or are isn't really relevant, since the target is to
produce a useful tool. Pointing out the weaknesses, which, after all this
time are either forgotten by or known to all of us, of one tool or another,
won't help. What I'm addressing is using TODAY's technology to facilitate
testing and verification of the S-100 bus. We're free to assume that the
width of various signals can be adjusted in 10 ns increments just to
determine what might work the best, even if the CPU can't really generate
that waveform, and we're free to try solutions to the S-100's 7 equations in
4 unknowns, not only as a linear programming problem, but with discrete
attempts with each possible solution, even though our CPU doesn't play that
way, just to find out what really is wrong.
This stuff is, in some cases, over 20 years old. Digital circuit design has
evolved considerably since the '70's and, as it happens, much of what was
sold on the S-100 market really didn't work, not because it was designed
back in the '70's, but because it was designed badly. Some of it worked,
"sorta," when in combination with specific other components (boards) but
others didn't really work reliably, (e.g. survive a 1k-hour test/burn-in)
under any circumstances. Unfortunately, sometimes the very circuits we
wanted to use were in this category and wouldn't work with OUR hardware,
even though it seemed to work fine with THEIRs at the
store/trade-show-whatever, where we first saw it.
What I would do if now were then is try a board in my existing test system
to see if it caught fire or did something equally irksome. If it worked,
I'd smile and proceed, and if it didn't, I'd attempt to find out why. If
the board is claimed to be IEEE-STD-696 compliant, I'd try driving it with a
'696-compatible set of signals to see if it behaved as expected. If yes,
then I'd have CPU issues to resolve, not "new-board" ones. The tool I've
essentially proposed enables you to do that without having to buy
'696-compliant boards, since you can't readily pick up the phone and order
them. It will, however, support you in an effort to whittle at each of the
boards you want to use in order to make them work and play well with the
others you wish to use, regardless how recalcitrant.
Features I've already built in include the abilities you mentioned, examine
and deposit memory content, easily extended, by the way to ensuring that the
memory works consistently, stop the processor, single-step through execution
of a program or cycle, jam an instruction onto the bus during an instruction
fetch, etc. What's more, it can do this without a CPU in the system, or,
assuming the CPU can do this, it can float the CPU and do "correctly" what
you think the CPU is doing incorrectly just to ensure the fault is on the
board you think it is.
Anyway, people who've had the experience of bringing up a dead multi-board
system in which the various manufacturers had no convention as to defaults
or operating modes, in which it was a given that three or five boards,
though all functional could and usually did yield a system which did nothing
until the incompatibilities were ironed out, and in which there were no
guarantees that ALL the components would work together at all, would have a
really good idea of what features a generalized emulation/troubleshooting
tool like this one should have.
Resurrecting a 20-year old S-100 is VERY different from bringing up an old
PDP-8. In the latter case, the bus standards were set by DEC, who knew what
they wanted to put out there. In the S-100, boards were often designed by
people with incorrect and/or incomplete information about what had to be on
the bus in order for it to work correctly. They were virtually always
designed with incomplete information about how other mfg's boards behaved on
the bus. What's more, that behavior was likely to change, depending on how
the CPU or other bus masters behaved.
Since it's difficult to get detailed information about how a board you just
bought at the flea-market works, you have to figure that out for yourself.
This is a tool for doing that. It won't do it automatically but it will
help you.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: allisonp(a)world.std.com <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: S-100 Bus
>> on the MULTIBUS-I. The only case in which I've used a front panel has
been
>> the one MULTIBUS-user-client I had once whose SW types thought it would
>> help. I doubt that it did, but it was a fun job!
>
>All the multibus bring ups were done using CPUs like intel 80/20 or
>national BLC204, even if the bus was a mess you could run with these
>as ram/rom/io on board were alive.
>
>> I agree, except that I belive that your PC-compatible would make an even
>> better FP substitute, with its nearly 1 GHz processor, 1GB of RAM and
>
>Not to say it can't. The SBC880 was a z80/serial/parallel/rom/ram on one
>card and more of less had those function isolated from the bus. This
>allowed severly crunched bus to be driven while having the luxuray of a
>real cpu and terminal interface. I used my own debug monitor in Eprom.
>The key is I still have it, and I used it from the early 80s on.
>
>For board level debug the explorer 8085 <netronics> was good as s100 was
>the 'add on bus" so if the card was not running you could
>drive/interrogate it.
>
>> several 3-doz-GB HDD's. Moreover, since it can not only load programs
and
>> monitor their execution, clock-tick-by-clock-tick, and disassemble
>> unfamiliar code in real time, generally waiting for the resident
processor
>> to catch up, it has potential not yet exploited. You can use it for
logic
>> analysis, signature analysis/failure detection, code verification,
>> profiling, etc. It's just another tool, but if it can be sold for less
than
>> IMSAI's FP, then it's not only an improved tool, but less costly, too.
>> Since you can repetitively stimulate the S-100 in a short loop, you can
>> easily address signal quality issues previous too slippery for most
folks.
>> You can look over the processor's shoulder or you can take him out of the
>> loop and run things yourself. When you've narrowed the problem you have
>> down to a small set of signals, you can poke around with your 'scope to
see
>> that all's as it should be.
>
>A s100 card with z80, io and enough ram and rom to run is a trivial board
>and was cheap even in the early 80s. Using todays parts 64k of eprom,
>64k (or more) of banked ram and other things would be not only simpler but
>cheaper too!
>
>The PC approach depends on the processor having lots of speed. What if
>all you have for this kind of task is a 486dx/33 or maybe an old P133?
>Not evey one is invested in PCs to the ears. FYI: my hottest PC is for on
>line use and not for adding cards like that and it's only a P166 with
>about 2.1gb. The only systems I have with an abundance of loose storage
>are VAXen.
>
>> I never used a front panel until I was asked to build one for a
>> multi-processor system on a VERY extended Multibus-I. That was fun and
>> profitable, but wholly unnecessary, I felt, since all the processor
boards
>> were completely self-sufficient with the exception of mass storage, and
>> since the CP/M image was in ROM, it didn't take long to boot, either.
>
>I started with PDP-8s, 10s then a CM2100 and firs micro was ALTAIR. FP
>were ok for some thing where seeing state was nice. I used it more to mod
>software that had IO that didn't match mine. It was the easiest way to
>see what addresses it was looping at.
>
>> I've normally addressed lightning damage with a call to the insurance
>> company, though they usually don't respond promptly. The procedure for
>> socketed boards is to take the parts out and test them in a tester. Most
>> prom programmers can do that.
>
>There were two proms in the entire system, 488 2102s, and lots of '367s,
>241s, and '244s. Not to mention the fried terminal and printer. In 1979 a
>logic tester for would have cost several times the system. Now, I'd toss
>the MB <PC> and start fresh.
>
>> I really don't see how a logic probe can help you until you've narrowed
the
>> problem down to a single board. What's more, it's common enough to have
>> several boards which work correctly in a system that doesn't. Sometimes
>> they just don't work and play well with others. CompuPro boards were
famous
>> for this. They often wouldn't work with other boards from CompuPro.
They
>> weren't alone in this, but their idea of interoperability was that MOST
of
>> the boards in a system which they sold would work together. Their
excellent
>> marketing and advertising made them the main force behind adoption of a
>> standard too weak to work, and too vague to provide guidance. They, more
>> than any other maker of S-100 stuff ignored whatever parts of the
standard
>> that it suited them to ignore, and they weren't alone. The problems of
this
>> sort are exactly the sort I'd seek to address with a bus probe. What's
>> more, there are few tools which will automatically allow you to find
>> inadvertent connections between signals, say, because of a mis-jumpered
>> board, or such, or to find that what one board maker uses for signal is
GND
>> to another.
>
>S100 was nice in one respect you could strip the bus and plug in pboard
>until it broke.
>
>Allison
>
>
I guess my types of experiences fall into the categories of electric
shock, muscle strains, smashed body parts, poison, and loss of sleep.
I am not too bright. And I think of myself as sort of a tough, rugged,
manly-man type of guy most of the time (hangover from playing rugby, I
guess). Anyway, I have moved some things that should have required 3 or 4
people by myself (eg refrigerators, pool tables, etc) and really injured
my back moving a Cipher 880 9-track drive a year or so ago. Agony! Not to
mention being virtually useless for more than two weeks and having to go
to physical therapy.
I'm also generally too careless with electricity. I have been zapped by
stupidly reaching into things and touching capacitors so bad that I've
actually almost lost consciousness a few times. Now that I have a family I
*try* to be more careful, but old habits die hard.
I've broken a couple of fingers and toes by dropping things on them; it's
amazing how much damage the hard, steel edge of a cabinet can do from just
a few inches.
My poison episodes have been dandies! The most recent was that black widow
bite I posted about recently. The other was a *large* hp printer boxed in
a wooden crate (recent model, 5si/mx with paper sorter, etc). When I
removed it, I noticed that it was covered with some oily liquid.
Completely dismissing this as somthing inert, I spend several hours
working on it; sticking my head inside the cabinet, running my hands on
it, eventually ending up with that oily liquid all over my hands, face,
head, and I'm sure some was ingested from my hands/lips. Then I got sick.
REALLY sick. Sick, like I wanted to die sick. It turns out that the guy
who send it had sprayed poison into the crate to kill the wasps that had
taken it over and neglected to tell us...
Aaron
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Peter Pachla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >....This machine will alwas have a special place in my collection
> >though, since it is so heavy I sprained a muscle in my back while
> >lifting it so bad that I needed several weeks of therapy to cure.
> >One of the hazards of the old computer collector...
>
> Quite, I've managed to injure myself a number of times shifting medium/large
> sized machines over the years.
>
> I trapped a nerve in my back both times I shifted my old PDP-11/23+ (in an
> H960 cab with a pair of RL-01s). And please, believe me, shifting a PDP-11/34
> by yourself is NOT a good idea....my back muscles still wince at the thought.
>
> Also managed to strain a couple of back muscles when I moved my SGI 4D/70GT
> into the house. There were two of us moving that beastie and we'd taken all
> the boards out of it first (they're about the weight of my 11/53 on their
> own).
>
>
> Not to mention that I've been in agony for a week now with a trapped nerve in
> my shoulder. But then again there really was no way to disassemble that "Space
> Invaders II" machine which I was moving out of the house....
>
> Anyone else hurt themselves, lost limbs etc??? ;-)
>
>
> TTFN - Pete.
>
> --
> Hardware & Software Engineer. Sound Engineer.
> Collector of Arcade Machines, Games Consoles & Obsolete Computers (esp DEC)
>
> peter.pachla(a)virgin.net |
> peter.pachla(a)vectrex.freeserve.co.uk |
> peter.pachla(a)wintermute.free-online.co.uk | www.wintermute.free-online.co.uk
> --
>
>
> The only safe way is to use a transformer that is correctly wired. US mains
is
> 120 - neutral - 120. which gives 240 between the 2 hots. European mains are
> 240 - neutral. Both expect the neutral to be at / near ground potential. If
> you wire it to US 240 directly what was neutral in Europe will be at 120v. I
> have several isolation / step up transformers that I routinely use to
accomplish
> this. You need to be careful how they are wired in order to have both primary
> and secondary tied correctly to neutral and the grounds MUST be kept separate
> from the neutral to meet US electrical code.
In Europe, many outlets (German ones spring to mind) are mechanically
symmetrical with respect to swapping hot ("Live") and Neutral pins, and AFAIK
all equipment has to be able to operate whichever side of the input is earthy
(=close to ground potential). I would have no qualms at all about running
European equipment of 120 - 0 - 120, although for travel I have made my own
autotransformer from a 100VA split-primary mains transformer.
Some old (before about 1960) equipment bonds neutral to equipment chassis. This
is of course dangerous to run except with the correct side earthy. I have heard
rumours of German equipment with a neon between chassis and earth that lights up
if you get this wrong!
When wiring a step-up transformer:
Single winding (autotransformer) should have neutral one end, 120V in the middle
and you get 240V out of the other end. Ground (earth) goes straight through
without connecting to the windings.
Dual winding (isolating transformer) Input across Neutral and 120V - output
gives you 240V. Bond one side of the output to Ground, NOT neutral, and this
becomes the new neutral [*]. This ensures that a fault to the chassis is
guaranteed to trip earth leakage protection downstream of the isolation
transformer (which I doubt you have) but not upstream of it. This is much safer
if (for example) hot and neutral are reversed on the input. (Note: if you wire
one side of the output to neutral, you have something no worse than the
autotransformer.)
I don't know whether this latter meets the US electrical code, but it is correct
:-)
As regards strange sockets, I don't imagine 3-phase would be at all likely in a
US domestic installation, but 220V happens occasionally. The usual plug is just
like the standard US 3-pin plug, but with the two flat pins at 90 degrees to
their familiar position. This can roughly be represented in ascii-art thus:
o o
120V _ _ 220V
| |
DEC used it on a lot of their European equipment...
Philip
[*] For full isolation, don't link ground on the two sides of the transformer.
Link chassis etc. on the output to the virtual ground terminal that's bonded to
the supply rail you've chosen as neutral. This means that you have to touch
both a hot wire _and_ the chassis befor it will zap you. For some testing,
don't bond at all - you can't detect a fault to chassis, but you need a fault
_and_ to touch the wrong wire before you get a shock...
Some more ascii-art, for the record.
Autotransformer:
________ 240
C
C
120 ____C
C
C
N ______C_______ N
Isolating Transformer wired as Autotransformer:
_____ 240
||C
||C
120 _____||C
C||C
C||C
N ______C||C____ N
|____|
Isolating transformer:
_____ 240
||C
||C
120 _____||C
C||C
C||C
N ______C||C____ N - Bond this to earth and/or chassis as necessary
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
Power Technology Centre, Ratcliffe-on-Soar,
Nottingham, NG11 0EE, UK
Tel: +44 (0)115 936 2000
http://www.powertech.co.uk
**********************************************************************
ftp://ftp.bb-elec.com/bb-elec/literature/232pclin.pdf
This is the full schematic of an industrial one. I built one with two
transistors years ago.. I will dig up my design and post it (used it on a
DG-116)
-----Original Message-----
From: John Foust <jfoust(a)threedee.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 2:23 PM
Subject: SGI Hardware Developer Handbooks available
>
>I just tried to answer a question from someone on the Greenkeys
>mailing list, regarding interfacing an ASR-33 to RS-232. My answer
>is below. I hope I got it right.
>
>- John
>
>At 11:30 AM 10/7/99 -0400, Barry Hall wrote:
>>Hello John and Christian,
>>
>> I was referred to you by Don Robert regarding connecting an ASR 33 to a
>>Microcomputer RS232 Serial COM port. Any help you can give me would be
>greatly
>>appreciated.
>
>The ASR-33 usually has what's referred to as a "20 milliamp current loop"
>interface. It's not RS-232. You can buy converter boxes from places
>like <http://www.blackbox.com/>, like the one at
><http://catalog.blackbox.com/blackbox/templates/blackbox/class13itemgroup59
8
>guest.asp?param=95&ig_id=598&title=High%2DSpeed+RS%2D232%26lt%3B%26gt%3BCur
r
>ent%2DLoop+Interface+Converter&related=>.
>
>There's an explanation at
<http://telebyteusa.com/catalog/appnotes/a65a.htm>,
> <http://www.mouse.demon.nl/ckp/serial/cl.htm>,
><http://telecom.tbi.net/data-if.html>
>and <http://www.bb-elec.com/techlibr.asp>.
>
>I'm sure someone has a web page with a homebrew conversion between
>current loop and RS-232. The voltage levels and swings aren't the
>same, so it's not just a matter of wiring.
>
>The circuit at
><http://www.ibhsoftec.de/english/screenshots/current_loop_converter.html>
>might be right.
>
>- John
>
The only safe way is to use a transformer that is correctly wired. US mains is
120 - neutral - 120. which gives 240 between the 2 hots. European mains are
240 - neutral. Both expect the neutral to be at / near ground potential. If
you wire it to US 240 directly what was neutral in Europe will be at 120v. I
have several isolation / step up transformers that I routinely use to accomplish
this. You need to be careful how they are wired in order to have both primary
and secondary tied correctly to neutral and the grounds MUST be kept separate
>from the neutral to meet US electrical code.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Meenakshisundaram <rmeenaks(a)olf.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 10:19 AM
Subject: Running a 220v computer in a 110v environment
>Hi,
>
>Probably some of you have already done this. I have an equipment, a
>parsytec xplorer, that runs a 220v. I got it from across the pond.
>Since I am in the states and the power output is 110v, is there any way
>for me to run this without getting a transformer to pump it up to
>220v??? Unfortunately, the parsytec doesnt convert automatically like
>PC and laptops of today. In my apartment, there is a funny looking plug
>next to out AC. I remember somewhat vaugely that it is actually 220v.
>Is this true??? How did you guys solve this problem???? I want to get
>a good solid response before I blow up the machine :-)
>
>Ram
>
>
>--
>
> ,,,,
> /'^'\
> ( o o )
> -oOOO--(_)--OOOo-------------------------------------
>| Ram Meenakshisundaram
>| Senior Software Engineer
>| OpenLink Financial Inc
>| .oooO Phone: (516) 227-6600 x267
>| ( ) Oooo. Email: rmeenaks(a)olf.com
> ---\ (----( )--------------------------------------
> \_) ) /
> (_/
>
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Pachla <peter.pachla(a)vectrex.freeserve.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 07, 1999 12:17 PM
Subject: Dangers of shifting classic computers (was: AT&T PC 6300 Plus Unix
box)
>Hi,
>
> >....This machine will alwas have a special place in my collection
> >though, since it is so heavy I sprained a muscle in my back while
> >lifting it so bad that I needed several weeks of therapy to cure.
> >One of the hazards of the old computer collector...
>
>Quite, I've managed to injure myself a number of times shifting
medium/large
>sized machines over the years.
>
>I trapped a nerve in my back both times I shifted my old PDP-11/23+ (in an
>H960 cab with a pair of RL-01s). And please, believe me, shifting a
PDP-11/34
>by yourself is NOT a good idea....my back muscles still wince at the
thought.
>
>Also managed to strain a couple of back muscles when I moved my SGI 4D/70GT
>into the house. There were two of us moving that beastie and we'd taken all
>the boards out of it first (they're about the weight of my 11/53 on their
>own).
>
>
>Not to mention that I've been in agony for a week now with a trapped nerve
in
>my shoulder. But then again there really was no way to disassemble that
"Space
>Invaders II" machine which I was moving out of the house....
>
>Anyone else hurt themselves, lost limbs etc??? ;-)
>
>
Quite a few times. When I was younger I would move RK05 drives all over the
place by myself - killed my lower back. To this day I have bad back
problems.
My worst injuries are:
RK05 / PDP 11/34 (no help) - bad lower back.
Honeywell 316 - cyanide poisoning, was in the hospital, wished I was dead
for a good 4-5 days as my insides were eaten out.
Honeywell 316 - The scrap dealer (Wayne Borer) that got the unit for me
brought it to the house when I was rather young. They got the entire case
(included H316, fixed head DH, interface bays, air conditioner) to end of
the truck when it started to fall. It fell on his NUTS! 3 guys (including my
dad) held the case away from killing him. He rolled on the ground for at
least 30 minutes in extreme pain. He never did have any kids after that.
Honeywell 316 - Rack mounted on a flimbsy case, fell over one night and
badly damaged the headboard on my bed. (kept it in my bedroom)
H-11 with 2 RK05s and a bunch of other heavy mainframes - Broke the shocks
in my dads caddy on the way home from athe Rochester Hamfest, scratches and
back pain from making it fit.
There have been more painful memories but I can't remember them all. The
cyanide poisoning was the worst.
> TTFN - Pete.
>
>--
>Hardware & Software Engineer. Sound Engineer.
>Collector of Arcade Machines, Games Consoles & Obsolete Computers (esp DEC)
>
>peter.pachla(a)virgin.net |
>peter.pachla(a)vectrex.freeserve.co.uk |
>peter.pachla(a)wintermute.free-online.co.uk |
www.wintermute.free-online.co.uk
>--
>
>
--- Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com> wrote:
> Yup, that would be the DEC "standard" three loop current loop interface.
> (Tx loop, Rx loop, reader-run loop).
Is there a picture of the "standard" 20mA connector with pinout? I want to
test my ASR-33 up against a VT220 and I need at least to make a pin-swabbing
cable if I don't need a 12V power supply, too.
> >Yep. Unfortunately I dont have any peripherals. Except the one RL01, and
> >apparently I dont have an interface board for that.
>
> I don't believe DEC made a Quad RL controller. I've only seen the M8433
> which is a hex wide RL controller that plugs into the PDP-8/a.
That is the only RL controller I am aware of. OTOH, I like it a lot. I
got one when I could not get RK05 drives, but I could get RL01 drives for
around $100 plus shipping (over ten years ago). At that time, RL02's were
still many hundreds.
> >If the core memory doesnt work out, is the MOS memory actually affordable?
I can't say for quad MOS. I've only got hex MOS... I haven't paid over $50
a board for any of it.
> >Anyone willing to tell me some PDP parts suppliers that may have some
> >interface boards,
I have bought much from Continental Computers including an RL8A, KT8A and 128Kw
memory board (MM8A-?) but you have to know by handle number what to ask for. I
rattled off a list of boards and they only had two or three of the ones I was
interested in.
> > like whatever I need to hook up that RL01 (what exactly
> >is a RL01 anyways).
An RL01 is a 5Mb, single platter, embedded servo-style, removable drive. The
RL02 is a 10Mb version of the same technology. They aren't all that fast, but
they were plentiful, being available for the -8, -11 and various flavors of
VAXen. IMHO, there is much less to maintain than than with RK05s. The OS/8
driver for the RL01 defines three logical units per physical drive, 40%, 40%
and 20% of the capacity, but the third unit is slower because it fills the
nooks and crannies around the first two units. It's because of a physical
device size limitation in OS/8.
> Maybe I should be looking to add floppy drives, etc.
Floppies are nice if you have a stack of media with stuff on it. I have
a few games and such. I'd like to be able to back them up to a modern machine
and cut a CD-ROM of the disk images. To that end, I've just extracted a
Tandon TM-848 floppy from my DataRam Q22 box and need to see about a power
harness (six pin, H-shaped) and a 34<->50 pin cable to hook it up to an old
box to do media conversion.
> >OR, are people using IBM's as a terminal, and running some program that
> >pretends to be an attached paper tape reader/punch unit? That might do
> >for starters, though its not anywhere near as satisfying.
If you didn't have a teletype, I guess a TTY emulator on a PC would be
a way to go, but I don't know of any punch/reader emulating software, per
se. I guess you could adapt ProComm or something like it that can upload
and download data over the application.
> >From there you have several choices, perhaps the simplest is the ASR33 with
> paper tape software. As attendees to VCF can attest, it makes a loud but
> somehow comforting ratcheting sound to hear FOCAL or some other system
> being loaded at 10 CPS. On Highgate there is software for RX01's (OS/8 et al)
It's not comforting to load papertape basic and Star Trek at 10cps... that's
a *lot* of tape. I was glad to have a highspeed reader on the 12Kw -8/L.
> Lots of fun ahead,
> --Chuck
For sure!
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
Here is a non-profit organization trying to unload what looks to be a very
nice and relatively complete Apple //gs system (with boxes!). I'd say a
fair price for all this (and taking into account that this is a non-profit
in need of cash) is $300 + shipping. Just a suggestion.
Please reply to the sender.
Reply-to: mwsmn(a)aol.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 17:18:08 EDT
From: Mwsmn(a)aol.com
To: vcf(a)vintage.org
Subject: Question
Hello,
I have a 1988-1987 Apple 2 Gs With The extended RAM installed. With the
historical value, how much would the system resell at?
-APPLE CPU
-14" MONITOR
-KYBRD/MSE
-250 SOFTWARE TITLES
-ORIGINAL BOXES FOR SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER COMPONENTS
-IMAGEWRITER 2 COLOR REFURB PRINTER
-ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION
We are a nonprofit organization. We are in need of a new system. We look
forward to your response. (If you can, please tell us a place to sell it.
USA only please)
Thanks For Your Time. Hope You Can Help.
Also, It's great to find an old-computer show. These wonderful machines
brought us to where we are today. Glad you are showing yesterdays
technologies!
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)verio.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puttin' the smack down on the man!
>
> Not to mention that I've been in agony for a week now with a trapped
nerve in
> my shoulder. But then again there really was no way to disassemble that
"Space
> Invaders II" machine which I was moving out of the house....
>
> Anyone else hurt themselves, lost limbs etc??? ;-)
About 10 weeks ago, I was working on the drives on my HP9000 and severly
sprained my lower back. I have been weight training for many years and was
lifting correctly. A little turn in the wrong direction and OUCH!!!
When asked what happened, I told everyone at work that I hurt myself
installing a hard drive in my computer. Most of the guys laughed and called
me a wuss. :-)
BTW: I'd guess those drives weigh about 125# each.
Steve Robertson -<steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
I have an old multibus-1 board from "Little Machines" on which the 186's and
'286's among other things are wired backwards and soldered to the board
because the original Intel data sheet didn't distinguish between the top and
bottom of the JEDEC "A" package which is a leadless ceramic chip carrier of
the type often seen in early PC/AT types. The board is so busy you can
barely see any of the surface, and it's much the same on what ought to be
the wiring side, as there are oodles of passives and other small-outline
parts, I'd say as many as 1000, on the "back" of the board, since there
wasn't room for anything more on the "front" where there are well over 100
DIP packages of various sizes.
This solder-in of the leadless chip carrier package was done interestingly
enough, in that the pins from an LCC socket were aparently extracted and
soldered, one-by-one, to the board and the device inserted UNDER them in
order to allow them to be soldered from the top.
It can happen to anyone, I guess.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: Help wanted in dumping EPROMs
>>
>> Yes indeed! The data sheets for the two parts will answer all the
>> questions. All one has to do is to stay awake. I wouldn't make such a
>> statement if I didn't know of instances where one has gone to sleep . . .
>> that's one who shall remain nameless . . .
>
>Make it 2, OK :-). I very nearly wired up a transputer socket
>mirror-reflected because one book showed the chip from the top and
>another showed the socket from the bottom. I caught the error just in
time...
>
>-tony
>
If anyone would like a complete collection of BYTE mags from 1993
until the last issue in 1998, drop an E-mail to the fellow below. He's
just looking for a home for them.
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 12:19:07 GMT, in seattle.forsale.computers you wrote:
>>Includes the last historic issue published in July 1998.
>>This i s a collector's set. My wife prefers basement space to
>>history. I would rather see someone enjoy the collection
>>than turn it in for land fill.
>>
>>Any takers?
>>
>>Please respond by e-mail. Remove % from the address
>>before pressing SEND.
Actual address is tcox(a)jps.net
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho,
Blue Feather Technologies -- kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech [dot] com
Web: http://www.bluefeathertech.com
"...No matter how we may wish otherwise, our science can only describe an object,
event, or living thing in our own human terms. It cannot possibly define any of them..."
please see embedded comments below.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: S-100 Bus
><If you're an S-100 user, particularly if you have experience in bringing
><up a system from totally dead to totally alive, I'd certainly like to
><see what your impression of your needs from such a device might be.
>
>I've brought up several IMSAIs, Altairs, NS*, Netronics explorer 8085,
>several mongrels and my multi-CPU s100 crate.
>
I've also brought up a number of S-100's and SBC's, not to mentions systems
on the MULTIBUS-I. The only case in which I've used a front panel has been
the one MULTIBUS-user-client I had once whose SW types thought it would
help. I doubt that it did, but it was a fun job!
>
>Front pannel systems were rich enough to accomplish the task once the FP
>was known working or nearly so. Often the problems were dirty switches,
>broken wires, failed oneshots or maybe a bad LED. Other problems were the
>older boards that didn't like Bus pins 20 and 70 (protect/unprotect).
>
>Must haves:
>
> ability to display memory
> ability to write to memory
> Start, stop and single step the CPU
Those go without saying. After all, this is supposed to be a diagnostic
tool.
>Most front pannel systems (alatir, Imsai, Ithaca intersystems, PDA-80 have
>the basic resources. A scope may be needed if there are timing issues
>or one shots that are drifted off.
>
>The non front pannel systems required a FP that could be plugged in. the
>easiest way was a a minimal CPU (Computime SBC880) that can drive the bus
>but is otherwise self contained. That and a terminal is as good as a front
>panel (better).
I agree, except that I belive that your PC-compatible would make an even
better FP substitute, with its nearly 1 GHz processor, 1GB of RAM and
several 3-doz-GB HDD's. Moreover, since it can not only load programs and
monitor their execution, clock-tick-by-clock-tick, and disassemble
unfamiliar code in real time, generally waiting for the resident processor
to catch up, it has potential not yet exploited. You can use it for logic
analysis, signature analysis/failure detection, code verification,
profiling, etc. It's just another tool, but if it can be sold for less than
IMSAI's FP, then it's not only an improved tool, but less costly, too.
Since you can repetitively stimulate the S-100 in a short loop, you can
easily address signal quality issues previous too slippery for most folks.
You can look over the processor's shoulder or you can take him out of the
loop and run things yourself. When you've narrowed the problem you have
down to a small set of signals, you can poke around with your 'scope to see
that all's as it should be.
>The multi-cpu system needed more as the CPUs were not commercial units
>IE: they never worked before so they had to be debugged first and that
>required a bus logic analyser (capture bus state 1024 cycles deep) that
>could trigger on specified conditions. This was needed to look at the
>interaction of the many cpus and DMA devices. Once the system could run
>code predictably (could still crash but reset to rom monitor was reliable)
>The bus analyser was almost by un-needed.
I never used a front panel until I was asked to build one for a
multi-processor system on a VERY extended Multibus-I. That was fun and
profitable, but wholly unnecessary, I felt, since all the processor boards
were completely self-sufficient with the exception of mass storage, and
since the CP/M image was in ROM, it didn't take long to boot, either.
>A simple logic probe was the single common tool besides a front panel or
>its analogue. A multi trace scope was handy for Altairs (too damn many
>one-shots!) and other system where the problem was logic that was damaged
>from lightining (my old NS* system).
>
I've normally addressed lightning damage with a call to the insurance
company, though they usually don't respond promptly. The procedure for
socketed boards is to take the parts out and test them in a tester. Most
prom programmers can do that.
I really don't see how a logic probe can help you until you've narrowed the
problem down to a single board. What's more, it's common enough to have
several boards which work correctly in a system that doesn't. Sometimes
they just don't work and play well with others. CompuPro boards were famous
for this. They often wouldn't work with other boards from CompuPro. They
weren't alone in this, but their idea of interoperability was that MOST of
the boards in a system which they sold would work together. Their excellent
marketing and advertising made them the main force behind adoption of a
standard too weak to work, and too vague to provide guidance. They, more
than any other maker of S-100 stuff ignored whatever parts of the standard
that it suited them to ignore, and they weren't alone. The problems of this
sort are exactly the sort I'd seek to address with a bus probe. What's
more, there are few tools which will automatically allow you to find
inadvertent connections between signals, say, because of a mis-jumpered
board, or such, or to find that what one board maker uses for signal is GND
to another.
>
>Allison
>
>
>
>
r. 'bear' stricklin wrote:
>The very first EISA machines were brand new in June of 1989, and were
>powered by 25 MHz 80386 CPUs. I used to have a copy of the Byte in
>question, which also featured MCA clones. I wish I knew where it got to.
>
>I don't think the first machines using 33 MHz 80486 CPUs were released
>until sometime 1991.
I don't think its the Byte article you mention, but the May 1990 Byte goes
into a comparison of EISA and Microchannel. Says the first EISA machine was
a HP Vectra 486 and talks as if the Compaq Systempro was next.
Hans
Hi Group:
A repost, just in case anyone missed it:
>
> Hi Gang:
>
> I'm interested in finding a card reader for my pdp-11 machines. There was
> one advertised as available earlier this week, unfortunately it has been
> claimed.
>
> The CR11 and CM11 models are what I'm looking for - they're a desktop
> variety that would work nicely with my current machines.
>
> Anyone out there have one they will part with?
>
> Kevin
---
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
<If you're an S-100 user, particularly if you have experience in bringing =
<up a system from totally dead to totally alive, I'd certainly like to =
<see what your impression of your needs from such a device might be.
I've brought up several IMSAIs, Altairs, NS*, Netronics explorer 8085,
several mongruls and my multi-CPU s100 crate.
Front pannel systems were rich enough to accomplish the task one the FP
was known working or nearly so. Often the problems were dirty switches,
broken wires, failed oneshots or maybe a bad LED. Other problems were the
older boards that didn't like Bus pins 20 and 70 (protect/unprotect).
Must haves:
ability to display memory
ability to write to memory
Start, stop and single step the CPU
Most front pannel systems (alatir, Imsai, Ithica intersystems, PDA-80 have
the basic resources. A scope may be needed if there are timing issues
or one shots that are drifted off.
The non front pannel systems required a FP that could be plugged in. the
easiest way was a a minimal CPU (Computime SBC880) that can drive the bus
but is otherwise self contained. That and a terminal is as good as a front
pannel (better).
The multi-cpu system needed more as the CPUs were not commercial units
IE: they never worked before so they had to be debugged first and that
required a bus logic analyser (capture bus state 1024 cycles deep) that
could trigger on specified conditions. This was needed to look at the
interaction of the many cpus and DMA devices. Once the system could run
code predictably (could still crash but reset to rom monitor was reliable)
The bus analyser was almost by un-needed.
A simple logic proble was the single common tool besides a frontpannel or
its analogue. A multi trace scope was handy for altairs (too dam many
oneshots!) and other system where the problem was logic that was damaged
>from lightining (my old NS* system).
Allison
Hi!
When I said the device had to work at high speed, I was referring to the
crosspoint switch which is used to distribute and collect the bus signals,
and by means of which one can assign an arbitrary destination for any of the
source signals, viewing them as channels rather than as individual bits.
The reason for this is to facilitate wiggling bus hanshake signal lines at
something approaching real-life speeds. If you've got 96 such channels and
want to update them all at a 2 MHz rate without skew between the various
changes, you've got to multiply that number of bits by the rate, which
quickly yields 192 MHz, which is the rate at which the circuit translates
the bits. The good (and saving) thing that I'd quickly point out, is that
it's seldom necessary to change all the signals. There's a way to shorten
the delay between bus updates by skipping the updates of unchanged
registers. That will help, hopefully with this bandwidth demand.
It's easy to reduce the signals changed in a transaction on the bus by a
couple of dozen by paying attention only to the signals relevant to a given
transaction. This means that the board should have no difficulty whatever
generating the typical data transfer handshake ant a normal speed, and
wouldn't strain too much to perform block fills and block transfers, and,
more interestingly, reasonably thorough memory verification, since that
actually involves only a couple of dozen or so signals.
I was/am contemplating a programmable state machine with which to perform
bus transactions at real-world rates in lieu of a "full-blown" crosspoint
switch because that way I could proceed to program macro-operations locally
as opposed to doing everything in the PC and suffering the performance loss.
What the crosspoint switch does for me is it allows me to group the inputs
and outputs in any combination I like, thereby making really fast bus
transactions possible since the delay form update at the PC interface to the
S-100 is a function of how long it takes me to load the registers I need to
load in order to do what I need. If only two or three registers need to be
changed, then loading them will be all that has to be done before generating
an update of the S-100. In any case, I'm considering an alternative design
which will operate at a much higher rate because of parallelism. In a
couple of weeks I'll know whether I can exploit that higher rate with
PC-resident software.
Keep in mind, that this thing has to work from the parallel port, else it's
too big a hassle. I don't want to build a kit to go in the PC along with
one to go in the S-100. What's more, I don't want to fiddle with USB, since
it's WAY too slow, and SCSI is a bit too complex for me to fiddle with for
this application. (I don't like having to buy documents on standards like
ASPI). What's more, I want this to be useable from a notebook. That's how
I intend to drive it.
As far as the graphical interface, I've considered how I'm going to sneak up
on this. I'm not a WINDOWS programmer, nor do wish to become one. I
thought what I'd do is write the code in 'C' using Borland's stuff, then
move to their WINDOWS-compatible software set or maybe SYMANTEC's, which is
also in house. Ultimately, I was hopeful I could generate the top level GUI
stuff, e.g. the front panel buttons, in Visual Basic. I've got a physical
front panel built with switches that look a bit like the buttons VB creates
quite easily, and, since each one has a little round LED in it, the VB
handler can emulate that as well. I expect that this will be a substantial
education for me, but I also expect that the fundamental software tools to
make this board a useful tool will be no trouble at all. I don't HAVE to
run it under Windows in order to use some display graphics, you see.
I think that I can cook up a library of routines (macros) which the user can
select from a popup menu or drop-down list, or some such. That way he
simply generates a block of data, be it a byte, word, or whatever, with
nearly no limits, and tells the system what to do by means of macro
commands, like fill memory from-to-with . . . maybe even some I/O
operations.
What's needed is a bit of outside input.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Dwight Elvey <elvey(a)hal.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: S-100 Bus
>"Richard Erlacher" <edick(a)idcomm.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you're an S-100 user, particularly if you have experience in bringing
up a
>> system from totally dead to totally alive, I'd certainly like to see what
your
>> impression of your needs from such a device might be.
>>
>> Dick
>
>
>Hi Dick
> I've only brought one IMSAI up from the dead. I only needed
>a dual trace oscilloscope but I realize that isn't always
>the best option. Way back when, I worked for Intel and
>was responsible for test of the UPP product. This had a 4040
>on it. I built a cable and interface that allowed
>one to replace the 4040 with a Series II development system.
>It was not a full logic analyzer, it just did normal read/write
>to ROM, RAM and I/O. This combined with an oscilloscope made
>a good trouble shooting tool. There isn't really a need to
>do 100 MHz operations to make a useful tool. One can make
>variable delays to adjust read and write timing to look
>for timing issues. The code that ran on the Series II
>was done in Forth. This way, one could quickly write a particular
>test routine for the particular problem one was trouble shooting,
>like one would do on a Sun with open boot. This would be quite
>hard to do in a GUI without some kind of command line
>macro ability ( the problem with GUI's is that, although a
>picture is worth a thousand words, they are often not the
>thousand words that you currently need ). Trouble shooting
>requires flexibility in test conditions that are much more
>varied than what would be used to simply go-nogo test.
>Dwight
>
In a message dated 10/6/99 9:45:16 PM US Eastern Standard Time, red(a)bears.org
writes:
> The very first EISA machines were brand new in June of 1989, and were
> powered by 25 MHz 80386 CPUs. I used to have a copy of the Byte in
> question, which also featured MCA clones. I wish I knew where it got to.
MCA clones? interesting! remember anything about the article? Ive an NCR 3300
that is similar to a PS/2 model 77.
There's a copy of the IEEE Std 696 in my lap. I've been searching for this document in "the pile" for quite some time and it's held up my work on a bus probe for the S-100. I intend to run the S-100 from my PC and have completed circuitry to enable transfer of data from the PC to the probe at a maximum of about 2 MHz. Now, this is entirely fast enough to run the bus, with the exception that it probably can't run it continuously at that rate, hence I've contemplated inserting a state machine to operate the bus automatically in a series of operations while sampling the activity on the bus at the same resolution as that at which it is being driven, e.g. 8 MHz for a 2 MHz processor clock, and more or less at that same proportion otherwise.
Unfortunately, I'm not convinced that it's necessary for me to have a really long sample memory (has adverse effects on price and circuit complexity). What's more, though I've considered including a large crosspoint switch for both writing and reading signals from the S-100, at real time, I'm not sure it will be of sufficient value to the user public. Its purpose is to allow compaction of the data transfers during a simulated bus transaction in real time. What's more, in order to get 2 MHz throughput, even in bursts, it requires I operate the device at around 100 MHz internally, which will be both costly and difficult.
Originally I intended this thing strictly as a diagnostic tool. When I noted that IMSAI is bringing back its front panel board and the box to accomodate it, I figured it might be useful to provide a fairly automated method for testing and debugging the thing, including tests for shorts, crosstalk, I figured that the notion of putting a Pentium-class machine in an IMSAI box might not satisfy everyone's debugging an testing needs, particularly if they wanted to run REAL '70's era hardware.
My intention is to allow the PC to function as the front-panel, and, to small extent, as a combined pattern generator/logic analyzer, for numerous purposes ranging from backplane troubleshooting to peripheral testing. The plan is to provide functional support for things like block transfers, I/O-to-memory and memory-to-I/O as well as memory-to memory-transfers. Memory testing, at least superficially will be supported as well. I'm contemplating a graphical interface for purposes of stimulating the bus, though, again, I've yet to see whether that's useful enough to warrant the effort.
This is YOUR big chance to have input into the design of this device, assuming you have some idea of how YOU'd use it. I've got to break the functional sections up enough that the device can be sold as a "kit" not requiring FCC approval, so much of the cost will be in things like adapter sockets for the FPGA's and CPLD's, which often outcost the IC's by 10x. Since FCC approval will goose up the cost by 100x, I'm trying to avoid that.
If you're an S-100 user, particularly if you have experience in bringing up a system from totally dead to totally alive, I'd certainly like to see what your impression of your needs from such a device might be.
Dick
--- Tom Owad <owad(a)applefritter.com> wrote:
> >Has anyone out there heard of a Multi-Mac Apple ][ Clone, model MT-600?
> That one's new to me. Is it in a similar form factor to the Apple II, or
> something more original?
It's a cheap knockoff of the Apple ][ style, down to the wedge-shaped
cable cutouts on the back. They did change the lid a little. It doesn't
have the same fastener as an original, nor does the bottom slope up in the
front. Other than that... they are vey similar.
> I run a site that documents Apple clones. May I quote you on
> <http://www.applefritter.com/appleclones/other.html>?
Yes.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
>>>> Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> 10/06 4:52 PM >>>
>>
>>and are sometimes referred to as
>>HP200 9800 series.
>
> What??? The 9800 series is the series of HP desktop
>compluter/calculators that includes the 9805, 9810, 9820, 9830, 9815, 9825,
>9835, 9845, 9816, 9826, etc. A few of them use the 98200 tape but that's
>the only thing they have in common.
>
> Joe
>
I know it sounds strange but I have a tape that I received with the 85 labeled
"HP200 Series 9800" made by Hewlett Packard. It is identical to the other
98200A tapes I have. I will post a scan of the label if anyone's interested.
Wayne
!
!
!
I am looking for a source of new, or nearly new, HP 85 tapes.
These are HP no. 98200A, and are sometimes referred to as
HP200 9800 series. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
These are large phototypesetting machines of the first or second generation.
Autologic designed most of their own boards but sometimes OEMed CPUs. It
would be wise to check the CPU cabinet. Also check to see if the paper tape
reader is a punch also.
If it is working it could be a museum piece. I bet there are few left.
Paxton
Hi, sorry it's already been called for.
Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: John Ott [mailto:jott@ee.nd.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 4:24 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Giving stuff away....
Hello -
I am interested in the scsi controller if you still have it. What will
the shipping be?
john
***********************************************************************
* John Ott * Email: jott(a)saturn.ee.nd.edu *
* Dept. Electrical Engineering * *
* 275 Fitzpatrick Hall * *
* University of Notre Dame * Phone: (219) 631-7752 *
* Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA * *
***********************************************************************
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Todd Jaspers wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone, my roommate and I are moving to a larger apartment and
> we have tons of computer junk and my girlfriend won't let me keep it at
her
> house! I really have no use for it but I don't want it to go to waste if
> someone has a use for it.
>
>
> 1) MGA Matrox PCI graphics card. 1mb ram. pretty slow.
>
> 2) RampAT 16 bit card. Adds 4 SIMM slots to any computer with a 16 bit ISA
> card slow. Manual and instructions included.
>
> 3) various CGA and Monochrome 8-bit graphics cards.
>
> 4) various old 286 and AT mother boards IBM.
>
> 5) A whole bunch of old computer manuals. Please take the whole lot.
>
> 6) E-ISA Scsi controller 32-bit
>
> Everything is free, just pay for the shipping.
>
> Thanks!!
>
> Todd
>
Ok, is there some trick to identifing pdp8/a quad height boards? Or maybe
most of these boards are not standard DEC issue... I have a lot of boards
that have wierd markings on the green or grey handles, all have VG DS on
two sets of handles, but one of those is covered with a round sticker with
a 3 digit number on it... very strange...
-Lawrence LeMay
>Has anyone out there heard of a Multi-Mac Apple ][ Clone, model MT-600? I
>was digging along the back shelf in my basement and found one... it's been
>there for quite some time (a friend abandoned it with me when I was still in
>college).
That one's new to me. Is it in a similar form factor to the Apple II, or
something more original?
>It appears to be an unremarkable clone, c. mid-1983 (S/N 8306055, suggesting
>to me a manufacturing date of June, 1983, which jibes with the chip dates).
>Inside were two cards - a clone language card with a 4-pos DIP switch and
>a clone dual disk card with PROMs labelled P5 and P6 (like a real Apple
>Disk ][ card). The RAM is 8 4164s, the ROMs are a wad of 2732s. It booted
>almost everything I threw at it except a "Castle Wolfenstein" disk that may
>or may not be defective (I/O error on boot after loading the HELLO program).
I run a site that documents Apple clones. May I quote you on
<http://www.applefritter.com/appleclones/other.html>?
Tom Owad
------------------------------Applefritter------------------------------
Apple Prototypes, Clones, & Hacks - The obscure, unusual, & exceptional.
---------------------<http://www.applefritter.com/>---------------------
>On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Wayne Smith wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a source of new, or nearly new, HP 85 tapes.
>> These are HP no. 98200A, and are sometimes referred to as
>> HP200 9800 series. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
>Don Maslin <donm(a)cts.com> 10/06 11:59 AM
>
>Wayne, I believe that they are the same as DC-100 tapes.
>
> - don
Don:
A little research has proven you correct as usual. They are DC-100A's.
Thanks for your help.
Wayne
!
!
!
Hi Everyone, my roommate and I are moving to a larger apartment and
we have tons of computer junk and my girlfriend won't let me keep it at her
house! I really have no use for it but I don't want it to go to waste if
someone has a use for it.
1) MGA Matrox PCI graphics card. 1mb ram. pretty slow.
2) RampAT 16 bit card. Adds 4 SIMM slots to any computer with a 16 bit ISA
card slow. Manual and instructions included.
3) various CGA and Monochrome 8-bit graphics cards.
4) various old 286 and AT mother boards IBM.
5) A whole bunch of old computer manuals. Please take the whole lot.
6) E-ISA Scsi controller 32-bit
Everything is free, just pay for the shipping.
Thanks!!
Todd
>> NeXTStations can indeed run standalone...just like cubes...they just
>>don't have expansion slots.
>
>Darn. OK, I'll remember that for next time. :)
I had a NeXTStation TurboColor for a while, which required a sound box to
plug the keyboard, mouse, and monitor into. If the unit you're looking
at is anything like mine, it would be rather useless without that part.
Tom Owad
------------------------------Applefritter------------------------------
Apple Prototypes, Clones, & Hacks - The obscure, unusual, & exceptional.
---------------------<http://www.applefritter.com/>---------------------
Greetings,
Does anyone here know anything about an Autologic APS5-1 system, model
number APS-5y-70-NFPA Type2? It's a rather large machine with a paper
tape punch, a large optical assembly inside the cabinet, a CPU with
lights and switches, and a serarate cabinet with a tape drive.
Between the 74xx series logic and the appearance of the system, I'm
guessing it was made in the 1970's.
--
R. D. Davis
rdd(a)perqlogic.com Be careful what you wish for --- you
http://www.perqlogic.com/rdd may get your wish ...and it might not
Tel: (410) 744-4900 be what you were expecting.
Hi,
I visited A1 Vente Ordinateur in St. Laurent, Quebec, today. They're
still operating, and they've still got stacks of stuff.
Most of what I saw were monitors, and everything I had on my personal
list was 'out of stock' thanks to their recent problems, but they're
expecting more loads of stuff in the coming week. I didn't ask about a
MicroVAX because I was there by foot (quite a long walk from the Metro!)
and probably wouldn't have been able to afford one anyway. :)
Most of the stacks are off-limits to customers, but I did find a
NeXTStation in the public area. I didn't take it because I don't think
it can do anything on its own. :) I asked if they had a Cube, but they
didn't. No Amiga stuff, either, although they did have a Toaster 4000 a
while back that apparently sold very quickly.
Anyway, SPAMmers or not, I'll probably be doing business with them in
the future. There is, after all, a lot of stuff that never appears at
the Salvation Army stores. :)
--
Doug Spence Hrothgar's Cool Old Junk Page:
hrothgar(a)total.net http://www.total.net/~hrothgar/museum/
One of the other recycled computer places I went to yesterday had an
interesting non-classic PC. It was a small, heavy, metal thing, with a
marbled paintjob, called a "Moby Brick". 486-DX25. It had a matching
marbled keyboard. Really cute. I would have taken it home with me had
it not been missing the external power supply, or if they hadn't wanted
$40 for it. (For a cute doorstop, maybe I'd pay $25-$30, but not $40.
At least not until I regret leaving it behind and go back for it. :) )
Anyway, I think this machine might be a future collectable. There are
so few modern machines with anything interesting about them, that I
think that unusual case designs might be the only thing to look forward
to.
Other than the BeBox and wierd Atari ST and Amiga clones, anyway. :)
--
Doug Spence Hrothgar's Cool Old Junk Page:
hrothgar(a)total.net http://www.total.net/~hrothgar/museum/
Yes indeed! The data sheets for the two parts will answer all the
questions. All one has to do is to stay awake. I wouldn't make such a
statement if I didn't know of instances where one has gone to sleep . . .
that's one who shall remain nameless . . .
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Help wanted in dumping EPROMs
>>
>> This particular case might be just a bit more involved, since pin numbers
>> are more difficult for the unititiated to track between the 44-pin PLCC
and
>> the 40-pin DIP. However, it really doesn't require one be a rocket
>
>Hmm... A good data sheet will show the pin numbering and positions for
>the PLCC device.
>
>[..]
>
>> In fact, I'd recommend one attempt to do this via the EPP port.
>
>It's not much harder (if at all) to use the plain old standard parallel
port.
>
>The best way to think of an IBM printer port is that it's 12 TTL outputs
>and 5 TTL inputs that you can do what you like with. Use a 74157 (or
>similar) to multiplex the 8 EPROM data lines onto 4 of the inputs (control
>the mux with one of the outputs). Use 8-bit latches (3 would be enough) to
>latch 8 of the outputs (might as well make it the standard 'data' lines),
>using other outputs to select them. Use the 24 lines you get by doing that
>to address the EPROM, and read the data back in via the mux.
>
>-tony
>
I have heard from the folks at the Computer History Museum,
regarding the non-commercial use of photos taken of the Exhibits.
They have asked me to limit the number of pictures to five or less,
and to include the credit info specified in their copyright info.
Thus shall I do.
The pix all came out well. I'll scan the ones I think are best and
we can find a classic computer site to put them on... I am trying
to get the (wierd) issues resolved vis-a-vis FTP access to my own
website... if I can do this quickly, then I'll post them there.
Cheers
John
Perhaps of interest to someone here...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 19:14:47 -0400
From:n4tua@juno.com
To: baswaplist(a)foothill.net, boatanchors(a)listserv.tempe.gov
Subject: FS: 9 nixie tubes
For Sale: (9) National Electronics display tubes. Condition unknown, were
working when removed. (5) NL-840, (2) NL-841, (2) with no writing. All 9
for $10 or singles for $1.50 each. Plus shipping. Thank you.
<73>, Collin N4TUA
n4tua(a)juno.com
" My favorite radios glow in the dark"
Hi all,
I really have to apologize for repeatedly sending private mail to the list.
Does anyone know about a mail browser with two different reply functions:
- reply to originator
- reply to reply address ??
The classiccmp feature of always having the list as reply address
is a little dangerous.
Regards
John G. Zabolitzky
I have a complete working IBM PC jr system with monitor. I am in the
Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. If you know of someone needing some or all of
this equipment, please refer them to me. It includes the 128k expansion with
second disk drive.
Bob Thornton
GrapeBob(a)aol.com
Joseph LeFontaine <webmaster(a)authorsnbooks.com> has a Tandy 2000 available
for whomever wants it. He's located in Halifax County, Virginia,
USA. Please contact him directly.
Reply-to: webmaster(a)authorsnbooks.com
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)verio.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puttin' the smack down on the man!
I know this is probably of little interest to anyone but all the same,
they're free for the taking. Please reply to the original sender.
Reply-to: rlgrampa(a)prodigy.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 17:44:56 -0500
From: Kathy Templeton <ktgrammy(a)prodigy.net>
To: donate(a)vintage.org
Subject: Old computers
I have two Tandon 286 computers. Each has two removable harddrives. They
are in good working order and if I could find someone here in Springfield,
MO that would take them I would gladly give them away. Do you want them?
I still have both of the keyboards but I use one of them on my new compter
(I just liked it). They each have one 5 1/4" floppy 1.2 meg size. Will
you pay the shipping costs?
Please reply to this email or email me at rlgrampa(a)prodigy.net.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)verio.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puttin' the smack down on the man!
Has anyone out there heard of a Multi-Mac Apple ][ Clone, model MT-600? I
was digging along the back shelf in my basement and found one... it's been
there for quite some time (a friend abandoned it with me when I was still in
college).
It appears to be an unremarkable clone, c. mid-1983 (S/N 8306055, suggesting
to me a manufacturing date of June, 1983, which jibes with the chip dates).
Inside were two cards - a clone language card with a 4-pos DIP switch and
a clone dual disk card with PROMs labelled P5 and P6 (like a real Apple
Disk ][ card). The RAM is 8 4164s, the ROMs are a wad of 2732s. It booted
almost everything I threw at it except a "Castle Wolfenstein" disk that may
or may not be defective (I/O error on boot after loading the HELLO program).
I only bring it up because I have never seen nor heard of another one. The
usual Apple clones I'm familiar with are Lasers and Franklins. This is clearly
neither.
It was fun booting my box of Apple disks to see what came up. I threw at it
some unpublished software from a former employer - "Cross Swords", a game from
1983-1984 that pitted warriors in a fantasy setting against each other with
pre-programmed goals in a capture-the-flag scenario. It was mostly done when
the company folded following Reader's Digest abandoning the home software
market (they sold all of our titles, "Micro Mother Goose", "Alphabet Beasts
and Company" and "Micro Habitats", among others). I was most the C-64 guy
there, but I did Apple and BBC Acorn programming, too. We were almost
exclusively a 6502 shop. IBM games came at the end, but with CGA graphics,
our stuff looked better on the C-64 or Apple ][.
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
On Oct 5, 17:14, Karl Maftoum wrote:
> A most interesting find was unearthed this afternoon, a DG Nova 3 with
> it's CDC platter drive! Not knowing much about the Nova series of
> computers, exactly what would be required to make it work?
Nice find :-) I don't have any practical advice or information, though :-(
> Also found was a home-built Q-Bus PDP-11 with RX50 drives, a M8192 CPU
> Module (What -11 is it?) an RQDX3 controller, a DEC card labelled M7546
> and a card labelle "CTBC Computer Plus 1986" with a connector that leads
> to a homemade switch a LED setup.
As you may have discovered, the M8192 is a KDJ11-AA, ie an 11/73 processor.
If it has -YB marked on it, it's an -AB version, which can accept an FPU,
and if it has -YC, it should already have an FPU. M8192's were commonly
sold as OEM boards, or as upgrades for 11/23 systems.
M7546 is a TKQ50, ie the controller for a TK50 'CompacTape' cartridge
drive.
Sorry, I can't help with the CTBC card.
I assume it has some memory and an SLU? And a card with a boot ROM?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>I wonder if Trenton or Mercer County NJ might work. This was the site
>of the excellent Trenton Computer Festival, which, until it became
>a mostly PC event, was known for the number of 8's, 11's Vaxes and
>Sun3's that were sold and swapped there.
Wow, that would be nice. If the show is in NJ, PA, or MD, I'll help out
and perhaps exhibit.
Tom Owad
------------------------------Applefritter------------------------------
Apple Prototypes, Clones, & Hacks - The obscure, unusual, & exceptional.
---------------------<http://www.applefritter.com/>---------------------
At 16:15 05/10/99 +0100, you wrote:
>Sam wrote:
>
>> Just to tease everyone, I've been approached by someone with the necessary
>> connections to do a VCF East, and a VCF Europe is about 50% certain.
>
>I'm very interested in VCF Europe - could you put me in touch (privately) with
>those concerned, please. (I've a good idea who it might be!). I want to help
>make this happen!
>
>It needs to be done.
>
>Philip.
VCF EUROPE??
I would not miss it!
I could organize a trip of 20-30 italian collectors.
Let me know.
Riccardo Romagnoli
<chemif(a)mbox.queen.it>
I-47100 Forl?
Hello, all:
I just got an NCR 3125 tablet pen-based computer with minor problems.
The CMOS battery is bad, and although I replaced it, I can't get into the
BIOS to reset the clock, etc.
Does anyone know how to get into the BIOS setup?
Thanks!
-----------------------------------
[ Rich Cini/WUGNET
[ ClubWin!/CW7
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<---------------------------- reply separator
There is copyright info available at:
www.computerhistory.org/copyright
It *seems* to me, reading this, that non-commercial dissemination
of thier own website images is okay as long as the requirements are
met to identify each picture according to their (the Museum's)
instructions. I am not quite clear on their wishes re: pictures
taken in the Museum and then exhibited non-commercially. As before,
I am expecting clarification on this point.
Cheers
John
> I took many pictures at VCF, and many pictures while at the
> Computer Museum. I will be happy to scan them into jpegs, if
> someone has a good place to store the resulting files. My own
> website is a little iffy right now as regards anonymous FTP.
>
> I imagine there will be around 20-25 pix worth looking at.... I
> will see how the Computer Museum shots turned out today... I took
> them in available light.
Please make sure NOT to post any pictures taken on the Computer Museum
tour. That was one of the conditions for allowing us to take any photos
there at all. The museum retains the rights to all posted photos of
their facilities. If those get posted they may not let us take pictures
there again. I'm not talking about the computers on display at the VCF,
just the ones at Moffet Field.
The ones with *** by them I have schematics and board layouts in hand for. IIRC
you are in the Twin Cities area - if this is correct contact me off list as
there were a couple of these installed there and I will give you contact names
and phone #. They may still have some of the old docs around along with the
Digital scanner that went with it.
Dan
>
>101 (i think the last digit is a 1) ***Time, Crystal modulo-n Variable
frequency
>102 **** Counter - comparator
>202
>504 (2 of these) ***** ADC control and conditioning
>505 **** Digital I/O for starting scan and MS status
>603
>644
>
>plus a blue circuit board with blank white handles, from Computer
>Operations Inc, C 10450-01 it has 3 connectors labeled CDJ2, CCJ1,
>CDJ1
>
>-Lawrence LeMay
I used to work for VG and I think I have some of the Docs on the PDP8 series of
boards. I still support the PDP11 series VG systems and last week upgraded 2
sites to RSX11M+ 4.6 for Y2K issues. I think I still have a complete "digital
scanner" that provided the A/D and scan start from that system.
Let me know what the 3 digit VG # is and I will see what I can dig up. They
were the acq and control for their magnet sector Mass Spectrometers
Dan.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 5:13 PM
Subject: pdp8/a boards
>Ok, is there some trick to identifing pdp8/a quad height boards? Or maybe
>most of these boards are not standard DEC issue... I have a lot of boards
>that have wierd markings on the green or grey handles, all have VG DS on
>two sets of handles, but one of those is covered with a round sticker with
>a 3 digit number on it... very strange...
>
>-Lawrence LeMay
Hi, folks,
First, the important stuff. I was over at HSC Electronics (one of the Bay
Area's surplus places) last Friday (just before VCF), and I found that they
had carted out a whole bin full of Vector extender cards and prototype
boards, all marked at 75% off original price.
More specifically, their assortment of extenders included ones for
S-100, Apple II, MicroChannel (PS/2), and other vintage gear. I was quoted
$40 for a MicroChannel extender in decent shape, and I really doubt the
others would be any more expensive.
The store's web site, containing their address, hours, and contact info,
is at http://www.halted.com/
-=-=-=- <break> -=-=-
Now, with that out of the way... VCF was fun this year! There are only
three things that I thought could have been done better.
1). If a person had pre-registered for both days, mark as much on the
badge/tag/whatever. Don't require that they stand in line to re-register
the following day.
2). Real badge holders/badges for all concerned would have been nice.
Perhaps make those of the exhibitors and attendees different colors so the
ushers can tell at a glance who's going to be going where.
3). POST THE OPERATING HOURS on the signs next to the registration table.
I had completely forgotten what time the whole thing was supposed to start
and end, and I had practically no access to the 'net during my trip to
check the VCF web site.
Other than that, I enjoyed it, though I had other business to tend to, and
as a result was only there for a chunk of Saturday. I'd like to hear how
the tour of the computer museum went.
I'll see the lot of you next year, hopefully.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Boards from a pair of pdp8/a
Hex Height
======================================================
M8433 RL01 disk controller
M8417 PDP8 Mos memory
M8316 Option Board 1
M8317 Internal Option 2
Quad Height
======================================================
M8320 Bus loads
M8330 Timing generator x2
M8300 Major register control x2
M8310 Major registers x2
8/e wire wrap board
computer operations inc C 10450-01
Its rather annoying that I cant identify 9 of the quad height
boards, so they're probably unusable. This list does not
include whatever is in the PDP8/e chassis, which I will pick
up tomorrow.
Of the 4 hard drives, the middle 2 said rl02 i think. The top and
bottom units didnt say what they were, and the hard drive I grabbed
was one of the unlabeled ones. Choosen because it didnt have
broken off connectors on the back, ie, it was intact. Others either
had broken connectors or power cord cut off, or both. Butchers!!!
-Lawrence LeMay
I found this and thought it might be of some help to Classiccmpers
to aid in their searching/identifying classic systems:
----------------------------------------------------------------
If you could kill someone by tipping it over on them, it might be a
mainframe.
If the only "mouse" it has is the one living inside it, it might be a
mainframe.
If you need earth-moving equipment to relocate it, it might be a mainframe.
If you've ever lost an oscilloscope inside of it, it might be a mainframe.
If it's big enough to be used as an apartment, it might be a mainframe.
If it has ever had a card-punch designed for it, it might be a mainframe.
If it weighs more than an RV, it might be a mainframe.
If lights in the neighborhood dim when it's powered up, it might be a
mainframe.
If it arrived in its own moving van, it might be a mainframe.
If its disk platters are big enough to cook pizzas on, it might be a
mainframe.
If Michael Jordan would need his entire annual salary to buy one, it might
be a mainframe.
If keeping all of the manuals together creates a fire hazard, it might be a
mainframe.
If it's so large that a dropped pen will slowly orbit it, it might be a
mainframe.
If it's ever been mistaken for a refrigerator, (or if the disk drive has
ever been mistaken for a washing machine), it might be a mainframe.
If anyone has ever frozen to death in the room where it's kept, it might be
a mainframe.
If it has a power supply that's bigger than your car, it might be a
mainframe.
If it has its own postal code, it might be a mainframe.
If the operators considered the addition of COBOL to be an upgrade, it
might be a mainframe.
If it was designed before you were born, it might be a mainframe.
If its main power cable is thicker than your neck, it might be a mainframe.
If the designers have since died from old age, it might be a mainframe.
-- end of forwarded message --
This particular case might be just a bit more involved, since pin numbers
are more difficult for the unititiated to track between the 44-pin PLCC and
the 40-pin DIP. However, it really doesn't require one be a rocket
scientist to figure it out. Like many other tasks it requires attention to
detail. The original inquiry came from someone wishing, probably more than
anything else, to read the contents of his EPROMs without risking damaging
them. It's really not likely that will happen so long as power and ground
are connected to the right pins. An additional risk might be that data
outputs might be shorted to one or another of the rails. If one is careful
enough to avoid those bugaboos, reading the things will be no problem.
In fact, I'd recommend one attempt to do this via the EPP port.
BTW . . . If your printer port is situated at the usual 0x378, then an
outputb to 0x37B will generate a write to the data port (same pins as at
0x378) acocmpanied by an "address strobe" as part of the EPP standard
interlocked hardware-handshake. An outportB to 0x37C will generate a "data
strobe" in the same manner, requiring of course, that one interpret these
correctly and respond with the appropriate "wait" pulse on what would
otherwise be the "busy" pin. I'm not "up" on the Pentium instruciton set to
such extent that I can guarantee that if one writes a WORD to the
odd-addressed 0x37B location it will write the bytes to the two sequentially
adjacent locations, but I would anticipate that if one writes a long word
(32-bits) to 0x37C, most EPP hardware will transfer the bytes low==>high in
order, via the data pins, and acocmpany each byte with a data handshake.
That would certainly make it easy to read from a PLCC socket.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: Help wanted in dumping EPROMs
>>
>> An adapter would not be very challenging to hand-wire, sir. You'll never
>> know when you may need it again.
>
>Agreed. For _reading_ EPROMS, all you need to do is match up the pins
>with the same name (I am told that there are rather more problems in
>making _programming_ adapters for PLDs, but that's another story). You
>can make a 'plug' to fit the EPROM programmer ZIF socket using a
>wire-wrap DIL socket (or some pins), and wire it to a PLCC socket. Should
>take well under 1 hour....
>
>-tony
>
I just got a PDP 8/s and would like to know if anyone here has a running
8/s. Please e-mail privately @ johnb(a)internet.look.ca
I have the dual bay system with
PDP 8/s serial # 260
PC0 read/punch - serial # 50
PC01 controller
139E multiplexer/AD - serial # 126
AA03A - serial # 50 ??????????????????
AA01A - serial #26 A/D
AA04 - serial #30 ???????????????
Just a quick message to those of us on The List who I met at
VCF... I had a FunTime, thanks to the FunTime everyone else seemed
to be having... even though I was conned into bidding on a Teletype
ASR35 and of course, it came home with me, like I have room for
another...
O well. ;}
A huge "THANKS" to Sellam and the Crew, and everyone who worked so
hard to make it all cool.
The other major cool thing was getting to put a associate a face
with the ASCII byte streams, at last.
The other other Major Cool thing for me, was the Computer History
Museum, wherein I (stern warning signs notwithstanding) actually got
to touch part of the Real ENIAC... I flipped one of it's old
switches.. hehehe... not to mention the two rolls of film I shot
there.
Here's to VCF2K! See you all there....
Cheers
John
Well... I found out that the PDP8 stuff was scheduled to be shipped away
tomorrow morning. They're only open to the public from 11am - 3pm T, W, TH.
So, I went out there.. Luckly I had send that email yesterday, as the guy
assumed my interest in the computer was a departmental request, which
overrides private interests.. And someone else beat me to the machines!
So, lucky me, the machines were held for me.
Anyways... The machines were in bad shape. Yes, it was a PDP8/e, and
yes there were 2 pdp8/a machines.. But someone had gone crazy with a
wire cutters, and all cables were gone or cut (the pdp8/e has a cut
power cord).
I managed to get the pdp8/e and one of the hard drives set aside, and
i did look in the pdp8/e and someone had taken the core memory stuff,
but there were still 3/4 of the card slots full of cards, so i can hope
this will be useful. At least 2 of the front panel switches are broken,
one missing.
Someone had already trashed the front panel of one of the pdp8/a units,
so i grabbed all the cards. then, I popped the lower part off the other
pdp8/a and grabbed all the cards I could, leaving only the few Hex height
cards behind the programmers console. So, I have some spare cards now...
One backpack full of pdp8/a cards, to be exact...
I also obtained a small RS-232 to current loop converter (without the
12Vdc 20ma power supply). And the top rack plate which is for a PDP8/m
which is in good shape except for a couple stickers that are on it.
All in all, I did what I could. One of my co-workers said he has a pickup,
and will drive me out there tomorrow to get those 2 boxes (pdp8/e and HD).
I expect the racks will be long gone before I get there, so what I have
is what I have.
-Lawrence LeMay
lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
PS: and no, i dont know what I have from the list of cards yet, though I
know i have the 3 main cpu boards at the very least...
I offered the guy $200, because the core memory was gone, and he said it
was way too much, so I asked what he wanted, and he says $30. I reluctantly
agreed...
I just wanted to say it was nice meeting the few of you I got the chance
to in my sprint through VCF this year. I was up on a combo
business/vacation trip (read: company pays for vacation if I do a little
work there) and had the whole family tagging along...those of you I didn't
get to meet might remember the guy with the shaved head brave enough to
bring 3 small kids with him...
As far as a SoCal version of VCF/swap...I'd probably actually get to stay
for more than an hour there, maybe even share my little piece of classic
computer heaven on en exhibit table! Sign me up!
Cheers,
Aaron
Mark game me this board because he didn't know what it was, and he wasn't
interested in it. If it is what I think it is, it's probably pretty rare.
It has 4 large Xlinx chips on it, a smaller Xlinx chip, a MC68020, and a lot
of glue logic. It's made by Micro Technology, Inc, copyrighted 1990, and the
sticker reads "CIQBA +". The only connector coming off the board is a small
10-pin connector like the one on a DLV11J. It looks like it's a Q-Bus
CI (Computer Interconnect) board, Is this right? Anyone have more info
on this? Web search turned up nothing useful...
-------
I took many pictures at VCF, and many pictures while at the
Computer Museum. I will be happy to scan them into jpegs, if
someone has a good place to store the resulting files. My own
website is a little iffy right now as regards anonymous FTP.
I imagine there will be around 20-25 pix worth looking at.... I
will see how the Computer Museum shots turned out today... I took
them in available light.
Oh yes... I'd like to see a show of hands of those interested in
a SoCal VCF/Swapmeet... it was a lot of fun and I'm pretty sure I
will try and have one here early next year.
Cheerz
John
The SoCal VCF idea is a good one. Let's do it.
Wayne Smith
Exhibit #4 at VCF 3.0
>>> John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com> 10/05 10:16 AM >>>
I took many pictures at VCF, and many pictures while at the
Computer Museum. I will be happy to scan them into jpegs, if
someone has a good place to store the resulting files. My own
website is a little iffy right now as regards anonymous FTP.
I imagine there will be around 20-25 pix worth looking at.... I
will see how the Computer Museum shots turned out today... I took
them in available light.
Oh yes... I'd like to see a show of hands of those interested in
a SoCal VCF/Swapmeet... it was a lot of fun and I'm pretty sure I
will try and have one here early next year.
Cheerz
John
!
!
!
An adapter would not be very challenging to hand-wire, sir. You'll never
know when you may need it again.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark <mark_k(a)iname.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 5:19 PM
Subject: Help wanted in dumping EPROMs
>Hi,
>
>Does anyone in the UK have access to equipment capable of dumping the data
>from 27C020 PLCC EPROMs? I have several which I want to preserve the data
>from. If you do, please contact me.
>
>(Alternatively, loan of a PLCC-to-DIP adapter for EPROMs would be just
>fine...)
>
>
>Bye,
>-- Mark
>
--- Sellam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com> wrote:
> Just to tease everyone, I've been approached by someone with the necessary
> connections to do a VCF East, and a VCF Europe is about 50% certain.
I would be *very* interested in a VCF East. I think that DC would be a fine
location as would Boston (but DC is more centrally located).
-ethan
=====
Infinet has been sold. The domain is going away in February.
Please send all replies to
erd(a)iname.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
>Anywho, in the Qbus -11 family of 11/23s there are distinct members that
>are different. If that wasn't clear what is?
Oh, I agree with you there. Things get even worse when you go to the
11/73 family - there at least three dozen different boards
all based on the same J11 chipset that's in the 11/73. And some of those
boards are identified by DEC as 11/73's if used with non-PMI memory, and
are identified by DEC as 11/83's if used with PMI memory! And within
a given board etch, there are different designations depending on
the rev level of the J11 chip installed and the frequency of the crystal
that's installed.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Hello Aaron,
If either of the Micro 3000's are available I'm interested.
Thanks,
Joe Silagi
WRQ,Inc.
wk: 206-217-7655
joesi(a)wrq.com
-----Original Message-----
> Date sent: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 13:28:11 -0700
> Subject: HP3000 Gear Available In Seattle Area...
> From: af-list(a)lafleur.wfi-inc.com
> To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
> Send reply to: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
>
> If anyone is interested in some HP3000 gear around Seattle, please let me
> know. The guy with the stuff doesn't want to be contacted directly and is
> looking for someone who can pick it up locally. I only wish I had time for
> a road-trip! Bring a truck!
>
> He's got:
> 1 - Series 37 (parts mostly because of a bad power supply)
> 1 - Micro 3000 GX (4 Meg + 300M Disc + 9145 + 8 ports)
> 1 - Micro 3000 RX (4 Meg + 300M Disc + 9144 + 16 ports)
> 3 - 7937 - 627M HPIB disc drives (BIG)
> 2 - Standalone 9144 drives
> 1 - 7980 - 6250 BPI Tape drive
> 1 - 7958 - 130M Disc Drive
>
> Nice gear...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aaron
I hate to admit it, but i use Outlook Express 4 and 5. I like it. It gives
you a choice of sending to groups or individuals on both email lists and
newsgroups. But if you are like me, you will always hit the wrong button
anyway.
OE 4-5 is free at the IE5 site on MicroSoft. If you have Win98, hit
start-Windows Update and you are there. OE 5 can also check you Hotmail
accounts for you.
Reagards,
"Only when no one responds to spam will it go away."
If someone tries to sell you something via
unsolicited email, don't buy it.
Jim Rossbach,
Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club Web Ring,
www.TonkinYachts.cjb.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Jgzabol(a)aol.com <Jgzabol(a)aol.com>
>Hi all,
>
>I really have to apologize for repeatedly sending private mail to the
list.
>
>Does anyone know about a mail browser with two different reply functions:
> - reply to originator
> - reply to reply address ??
>
-------------snip-------------------
Sam wrote:
> Just to tease everyone, I've been approached by someone with the necessary
> connections to do a VCF East, and a VCF Europe is about 50% certain.
I'm very interested in VCF Europe - could you put me in touch (privately) with
those concerned, please. (I've a good idea who it might be!). I want to help
make this happen!
> Of course, as these things are, they could go nowhere, but I think the two
> parties interested in doing each event respectively are serious, so stay
> tuned for further developments :)
It needs to be done.
Philip.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
Power Technology Centre, Ratcliffe-on-Soar,
Nottingham, NG11 0EE, UK
Tel: +44 (0)115 936 2000
http://www.powertech.co.uk
**********************************************************************
Hi Henk,
it is worse: I have been at that place already two times,
once about two years ago, and then last Saturday --- these
people are _VERY_ effective at obtaining things, quite a few
people whom I asked about old hardware told me
"Eugenoe got it all already", referring to Eugene Miya, one of the
volunteers working for that organization. He is at NASA Ames,
deeply involved with many of the Supercomputer (and previous CDC)
sites here.
I tried the two email addresses of Mr. Bartsch at Synstar, both return
"user unknown". When I am back to Germany in two weeks I will
use the ancient technology of the telephone.
Thanks and regards
John