>> >So what do you call the plug on a 'walkman' headphone? We'd call it a 3
>> >pole (or 'stereo') 3.5mm jack plug.
>>
>> Here when it's not called 3.5mm, it's called 1/8th inch. And the 2.5mm
>> version is 3/32 inch.
>Yes, but what do you call that type of connector? Is it a 'phone plug'
>even though it's not 1/4" in diameter, or what?
Yep, it's still a "phone plug", often listed as a "mini phone plug".
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
--- allisonp <allisonp(a)world.std.com> wrote:
> 74C92x is TI and you need to find a TI or maybe motorola CMOS databook
> CA1980ish.
> >NS 74C921...
These are not TI, they are Nat Semi as indicated by the double squiggly
lines before the number. In any case, if I have the relevant data book,
it's backed way far away in a box somewhere.
Thanks to all for all the info.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Does anybody know where (if?) there is a dedicated website for the Acorn A4
laptop? All my searching turned up nil.
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, 1541, FSD-1, GeoRAM 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
"Spectrum": Tandy Color Computer 3.
"Boombox": Sharp PC-7000.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I've been offered a cheap price on a tubeful of Signetics 82S123 bipolar
PROMs.
If memory serves (pun intended), these were used as boot ROMs for various
PDP-11's of the UniBus persuasion.
Is this so? If so, are they also useful for other classic apps? I'm
considering picking them up, but don't know for sure whether I'd be wasting
$10 or not...
Thanks in advance.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
A new version of Ersatz-11 is now available. V2.2 of the freeware Demo
version may be downloaded from www.dbit.com as usual, and commercial users
with current update subscriptions (or ones that expired only recently) will
be mailed update disks tomorrow.
Probably the most interesting addition for hobby users is the new VT11
vector graphic display processor emulation. Yes, it runs the Lunar Lander
game. It also works nicely with the GT ON command in older versions of
RT-11, as well as EDIT.SAV's scroller mode. A copy of Jack Burness's Lunar
Lander game which is all set up to run under the emulator is available at:
http://www.dbit.com/pub/e11/lunar/
Other changes which are visible even in the Demo version include the
SET CPU FIS and SET CPU EAE options, the Interlan NI1010A/NI2010A Ethernet
emulation, the built-in mini-assembler, and the overhauled manual.
The full commercial V2.2 release includes the above changes, plus it
adds a new DR11C/DRV11 emulation using TLC's DCI-1300 PCI board, which
is pin-compatible with the DR11C/DRV11. Also there's a new DH11/DM11BB
emulation, the RocketPort driver can handle ISA cards (used to be PCI only),
the SCSI disk driver can partition disks on any boundary, multiple serial
ports can be attached to the same emulated PDP-11 port (with duplicate
output and merged input), and the Q/Unibus adapter drivers allow subsetting
of the I/O page so you can have multiple adapters, to get a dual Q/Unibus
system, or two identical busses for distributing heavy DMA loads. The new
DMA-friendly BCI-2004 bus adapter is supported in addition to the older
BCI-2003/2103 and UPG-3600 boards. Also, the DEQNA emulation now supports
booting over the network.
Acrobat files containing the manuals for all three versions (Demo, Lite, full)
of E11 are available on the "Links" page on www.dbit.com. The Demo version's
manual .PDF file is also part of the self-extracting INSTALL.EXE archive, plus
it's available as a PostScript file at:
ftp://ftp.dbit.com/pub/e11/e11demo.ps
The E11/Linux port is nearing completion and will be released this summer,
however it will probably only be available in a commercial version.
John Wilson
D Bit
www.dbit.com
Yow! The things that happen to an overloaded email account... Well, I
finally started reading the digests for the list. I'm up to early
February now! Only a month left to catch up with.
Well, I finally found the perfect computer! It's an HP Vectra
486/25NI. When I was volunteering at the computer lab at
OMSI(http://www.omsi.edu/), my favorite computer was a Vectra 386.
They're just such cute computers! Well, here in Portland at the NW
PDX/Vaughn St. Wacky Willy's, they have probably two dozen Vectras of
various models(most are 486/25N or 33N) for $20 each. After looking
at them for a while, I noticed that the 25NI(the only one I saw, but
there may have been others) has a built-in 10Base-T ethernet port on
the back! Not only that, but it has an Overdrive socket that can
accept a 486DX2/66 or an Overdrive kit. Pretty good! It has 8MB RAM
and a 120MB hard drive, not too bad. It had Windows 3.1 on it, but it
would crash both when it started up(actually an unhappy mainframe
connection) and when it shutdown(Windows crash). I think they all had
Attachmate (I can't remember if those are 3270) network adapters in
them. Anyways, it got wiped and a fresh copy of DOS installed. Now
I'm happy, I finally have a useable PC(my PS/2 386's just weren't
good enough).
OK, so it's a bit new for you guys. They also had a Televideo
terminal and some HUGE IBM printer(I forget the model... coax
connector on back).
Now, to deal with my overcrowded basement. I need to get rid of some
stuff! To start off with, I have some terminals to get rid of. I
think I can dig out about 6 of them, maybe a few more I'm not sure.
They are the Wyse WY-99GT. Most of them are a little yellowed, but
they work fine. They're free for the taking, I just need some time to
find them all and match them with their keyboards. The only catch is
that you have to pick it up at my house in north Portland(just off of
I-5). Email me if you're interested and I'll let you know when
they're ready to go.
Back to reading another months worth of email digests...
--
/-------------------------------------------------------\
| http://jrollins.tripod.com/ rexstout(a)uswest.net |
| KD7BCY List admin for orham and ham-mac at www.qth.net |
| pdxham at www.onelist.com |
\-------------------------------------------------------/
On Apr 1, 22:26, Tony Duell wrote:
> The Spectrum uses a 'power connector', probably 2.5mm (but I've not
> measured it). The central pin of the part on the PCB is -ve, and the
> outer of the plug (cable mounted part) is therefore +ve.
>
> The ZX81 uses a 3.5mm jack socket (what you call a 'phone socket' across
> the Pond) for the power input. The tip is +ve and the sleeve is -ve.
Oops, looks like I was too hasty and grabbed the wrong PSU. I'm sure Tony
is right, now that I think about it. The ZX81 certainly uses a 3.5mm jack.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Apr 1, 13:09, Chris Kennedy wrote:
> Technoid(a)cheta.net wrote:
>
> > I ran accross a reference in the newsgroups that indicates the Toshiba
> > 3701b cdrom drive can be run on a sun box with the change of a single
> > jumper but what jumper.
>
> I've no ideal; all of my "Sun" CDROM drives are Toshiba but other than
> a factory test jumper and the ID jumpers there's nothing to suggest that
> they have hardware-selected block sizes.
Early Suns need the drive to be set for 512-byte blocks; later Sun boot
PROMs can issue the appropriate mode-select command if they detect the
drive is set to 2048-byte blocks.
XM3301 and XM3401 have two pairs of pads on the PCB near the jumper block;
these are normally both closed (bridged by a thin track) on drives sold for
the PC market, but both open for Suns. The pads are small semicircles,
labelled 0 and 1.
There's a very similar set of pads on an XM3601, but they don't change the
blocksize, at least not with standard Toshiba firmware. I don't know about
a 3701, as I don't have one.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 09:09:55 -0800
> From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
> Subject: PROMs offered: Should I take?
>
> I've been offered a cheap price on a tubeful of Signetics 82S123 bipolar
> PROMs. If memory serves (pun intended), these were used as boot ROMs for various
> PDP-11's of the UniBus persuasion.
> Is this so? If so, are they also useful for other classic apps? I'm
> considering picking them up, but don't know for sure whether I'd be wasting
> $10 or not...
> Thanks in advance.
The 82S123 is the installed monitor PROM in the Quest Super ELF and
it's a
great little PROM for any 1802 application. I believe most of the toggle
switch
monitors listed in the PE ELF articles will fit in 32 bytes. And since
the 1802
need external address latching to access more than 256 bytes, having
your
whole operating system in 32 bytes leaves plenty of space for
applications
on a 256 byte minimalist system. :)
--Doug
====================================================
Doug Coward dcoward(a)pressstart.com (work)
Sr. Software Eng. mranalog(a)home.com (home)
Press Start Inc. http://www.pressstart.com
Sunnyvale,CA
Curator
Analog Computer Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
====================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com <CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 31, 2000 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: I need some PDP-11 RT11 archiving software
>>I am spending all my time right now packing and rackmounting - I have no
>>time to write anything. I will have some people come over and feed in the
>>paper tape this weekend. While I won't be able to archive most of it, I do
>>hope to at least read in most of the source code on paper tape. (I have
over
>>310 PDP-1 paper tapes alone).
>>
>>This program needs to be *very* easy to use and hopefully supports
>>X/Y-MODEM. I will set up a terminal program at this end that supports 32
>>character file names (windows 98). This program would have to run under
>>RT11-V3B, or RT11V4 BL. Hopefully it would send the code down a serial
line
>>separate serial port.
>
>Umm, what's wrong with Kermit? The latest Kermit for RT does just fine
under
>RT-11 V4, and Kermit is available for just about every other piece
>of hardware ever created. See ftp://kermit.columbia.edu/
>
>>It would be really nice if this software just asked the end user to load a
>>paper tape, then huit return, and it sends the data read out a separate
>>serial port, then prompts to load the next one.
>
>What sort of paper tape reader are you using? If it's a serial reader,
>you can hook it straight up to a PC-clone running MS-DOS and MS-Kermit
>(or Linux and C-Kermit) and archive the tapes that way. Both MS-Kermit
>and C-Kermit include powerful scripting languages.
PC05 with a PC11 controller.
>
>Remember, you *don't* have to start from scratch, others of us have
>been archiving this sort of stuff for many years.
>
I appreciate that. Do you have this archived:
PDP-1 source code.
PDP-11 source code - Dos/Batch-11 , RT11. I also have source code to most of
the packages they released.
If you have this stuff then I won't bother archiving all the source code I
have and pass it on. I did get almost all the source from the original
minicomputers dec knocked out.. alot of it was internal.
john
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>
On Apr 1, 10:48, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> In my eyes, though, the real prize was a Timex Sinclair 1000 with 1016
RAM
> pack and six tapes, manual and all the cables EXCEPT the power supply.
The
> manual has no pinout. It looks like a 9V 1/8" jack but is it centre
> negative or positive?
It's centre-negative, on a 2.5mm power jack.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
> VAX station 2000 HD details?
A lot of what you might ever want to know is answered in
ftp://ftp.spc.edu/third-party-disks.txt
I'm guessing that between that document and the DEC Micronotes about
80% of the questions asked here about DEC stuff are answered...
Tim.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: healyzh(a)aracnet.com [mailto:healyzh@aracnet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 9:34 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Messages Per Month
>
>
> > I was just checking the number of messages that have come
> through this year
> > and it is pretty close to 3900 so far! Let's see. At 90
> days into the year,
> > it averages out to about 63 per day. No wonder things get
> lost in my inbox
> > :)!
Wonder how many it would be if Tony were still posting :-)
Anyone know what happened to him?
Steve Robertson <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
Not really old enough to be a classic but looks useful. Sep
portable, w/handle Hard drive-----model VS410-AA--
Anyone know what is inside--drivewise? RD52,53,54 maybe?
Thanks
Unix server freaks missed out at the Santee swapmeet. Some guy was selling an
original NeXT for $75, there were a whole row of Sparc SLCs at $15 a pop,
and an SGI Indigo and two SParc 2s. The Sparc 2s were loaded with Linux and
ready to run. There was also a Mac Portable, but by the time I came back to
buy it it was gone :-( The only server I care about is my Apple Network Server
500, but if you're near the San Diego area show up on the first/third
Saturdays of the month -- they might be back. There were also some assorted
Data General boards (dated 1968) but I have little experience with them.
I got, myself, an NEC 8201A. I understand this acts like a Model 100. It
works great, came with the leather case, and is in fantastic condition, but
it has no manuals whatsoever. Any resources I might consult for it? How do
I connect a modem (or does it have an internal one) to use the Term program?
It was only $10 :-)
In my eyes, though, the real prize was a Timex Sinclair 1000 with 1016 RAM
pack and six tapes, manual and all the cables EXCEPT the power supply. The
manual has no pinout. It looks like a 9V 1/8" jack but is it centre negative
or positive? At the bottom of the box, when I got it home, I also found
that there was, of all things, an AIM-65 BASIC manual in there too.
Also, has anyone turned up an Atari 130XE power supply in their travails?
I'm still trying to get that XEGS working.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)ptloma.edu
-- "I'd love to go out with you, but I've dedicated my life to linguini." -----
Well, 82s123 are proms, they are used in a lot of places however are they
programmed or not?
If they are you get whats in them. If not, you need a way to blast them.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Saturday, April 01, 2000 12:21 PM
Subject: PROMs offered: Should I take?
> I've been offered a cheap price on a tubeful of Signetics 82S123 bipolar
>PROMs.
>
> If memory serves (pun intended), these were used as boot ROMs for various
>PDP-11's of the UniBus persuasion.
>
> Is this so? If so, are they also useful for other classic apps? I'm
>considering picking them up, but don't know for sure whether I'd be wasting
>$10 or not...
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
>http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
>Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
>"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
>own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
>
9102=2102 sram. It's just another number for the same thing.
74C92x is TI and you need to find a TI or maybe motorola CMOS databook
CA1980ish.
Allison
From: Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com>
>AMD 91L02 - I know it's some kind of SRAM but not the size or pinout. The
9101
>is 256x4. This one is likely to be either 1024x1 or 1024x4 but I don't
know
>which.
>
>NS 74C921 - The 74C922 and 74C923 are somewhat common keyboard encoders,
one
>of which was used on the Netronics Elf-II design. I can't find any info on
>the pinout of the 74C921, but I did find several places selling them from
>$6 USD to 72 Danish Kroner (however much that is)
>
>I have a few of each, along with 2Kb of 21L02 chips (-2L and -4L speeds,
>whatever they are), all with 1979 - 1983 date codes.
>
>Any clues?
>
>Thanks,
>
>-ethan
>
>
>=====
>Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
>vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
>
>The original webpage address is still going away. The
>permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
>
>See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com
>
The hard drive can be any of the RD51-54, RD31, RD32 others are possible as
user retrofits.
Typically the hard drive was a RD53(71mb) or RD54(159mb).
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Smith <ip500(a)roanoke.infi.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Saturday, April 01, 2000 3:06 PM
Subject: VAX station 2000 HD details?
>Not really old enough to be a classic but looks useful. Sep
>portable, w/handle Hard drive-----model VS410-AA--
> Anyone know what is inside--drivewise? RD52,53,54 maybe?
>Thanks
>
I've done the basic digging (www.chipdir.com, etc.) and can't find info
on the following chips I found in a box of stuff some one gave me a while
back:
AMD 91L02 - I know it's some kind of SRAM but not the size or pinout. The 9101
is 256x4. This one is likely to be either 1024x1 or 1024x4 but I don't know
which.
NS 74C921 - The 74C922 and 74C923 are somewhat common keyboard encoders, one
of which was used on the Netronics Elf-II design. I can't find any info on
the pinout of the 74C921, but I did find several places selling them from
$6 USD to 72 Danish Kroner (however much that is)
I have a few of each, along with 2Kb of 21L02 chips (-2L and -4L speeds,
whatever they are), all with 1979 - 1983 date codes.
Any clues?
Thanks,
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
I have four Qbus cards that I am interested in finding out what they are.
One is a Micro Technology QTS25. It has a 50 pin header. I was wondering if
it was a SCSI card?
The second is an Emulex QD331040100 Rev. J. This has a 60 pin header and two
26 pin headers. I was wondering if this was a SMD drive controller?
The third is a Dilog DQ696-20.vThis has a 34 pin header and two 20 pin
header. My guess is that it is a MFM or ESDI hard drive controller.
In the same group of cards is a DEC M7546 which I believe is a TK50 tape
drive controller. Why is it called a Maya Controller?
Thanks for the help.
Paxton
>One is a Micro Technology QTS25. It has a 50 pin header. I was wondering if
>it was a SCSI card?
This is a TD Systems Viking controller, tape-only.
>The second is an Emulex QD331040100 Rev. J. This has a 60 pin header and two
>26 pin headers. I was wondering if this was a SMD drive controller?
That's right, a QD33, MSCP emulating. It handles fairly fast SMD drives (i.e.
Eagles, 2344's, etc.)
>In the same group of cards is a DEC M7546 which I believe is a TK50 tape
>drive controller. Why is it called a Maya Controller?
I believe that Maya was the DEC
development code-name for the TK50. The Aztec, IIRC, was the RC25.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I thought the classic PDP-11 unix way was UUCP.
Allison
..>On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Chris Kennedy wrote:
>>
>> Dunno, but I was using FTP in 1975-76. I'd guess that
>> any behavioral resemblence is more a consequence of the
>> two both having similar functions, i.e., moving files
>> around, rather than any sort of common parentage...
>>
>
>If you were using it in 1975-1976, it wasn't FTP as it exists today -
>it would be the FTP implemented on top of the "old" ARPANET protocols
>(sometimes referred to as "NCP", but I believe more properly referred to
>as simply "Host-to-Host Protocol").
>
>But that reminds me of a question I had while I was having lunch today ...
>Was there ever an implementation of the old ARPANET protocols on a PDP-11
>or VAX Unix? If it ever existed, I'd guess it would have had to have been
>on top of Seventh Edition, but I can't recall ever seeing any drivers for
>an ACC LH/DH or DEC IMP-11 on any incarnation of that platform. Berkeley
>Unix added TCP/IP in 4.1a, but I don't remember if there had been any
>ARPANET support (for the old protocol) before that.
>
>--Pat.
>
>
On Mar 31, 14:57, John Allain wrote:
> Funny, I've been using Kermit since 1981 and FTP since 1985 and
> I still don't know which egg/chicken came first.
> They seem awfully similar from a user's standpoint.
> Anybody know If FTP is based on Kermit or Vice-Versa?
They're fairly different "inside". For example, kermit assumes an
"unreliable" connection, and does it's own error-checking, while FTP relies
to some extent on a transport layer that already has error-checking. I
suppose they naturally have some similarities on the "outside" because they
serve similar purposes, though. Anyway, kermit predates FTP by a few
years.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>Funny, I've been using Kermit since 1981 and FTP since 1985 and
>I still don't know which egg/chicken came first.
>They seem awfully similar from a user's standpoint.
>Anybody know If FTP is based on Kermit or Vice-Versa?
The first RFC for FTP is RFC 765, from June 1980. It begins:
The objectives of FTP are 1) to promote sharing of files (computer
programs and/or data), 2) to encourage indirect or implicit (via
programs) use of remote computers, 3) to shield a user from
variations in file storage systems among Hosts, and 4) to transfer
data reliably and efficiently. FTP, though usable directly by a user
at a terminal, is designed mainly for use by programs.
Note that today there are few "programs" that know how to speak FTP
directly, when someone says "FTP this" they almost always mean running
the user-types-command-to-a-FTP-client.
(Yes, there certainly are some programs that know how to speak FTP, I'm
just pointing out that this isn't as common as the originators of the
protocol wanted. If anything, it seems to be gaining in popularity
as a "built-in" protocol, for example wget will take a ftp: or http:
URL quite interchangably.)
The user interface for both Kermit and FTP certainly are similar, and
that shouldn't be a surprise, since the "big iron" being hooked up to
other "big iron" in that day was almost always PDP-10 to PDP-10. Both
the Kermit and FTP command styles are descended from the PDP-10 conventions
(the TOPS-20 monitor in particular.)
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I wrote:
>The first RFC for FTP is RFC 765, from June 1980. It begins:
Whoops, I found several earlier ones, extending all the way back to
RFC 354 (from 8-Jul-1972). This references RFC264, which doesn't seem
to exist anymore.
Tim.
>I was just looking over a notebook on what appears to be an OS called
>Storage Machine 1 by FileTek. I was wondering if anyone knows anything
>about this, and what hardware it ran on. Some notes identify the
>cartridge tape drive as "TK50" and the system seesm to have had a big optical
>disk library device, about 2.3 or 2.6 gigs.
>
>Does this sound familiar to anyone? It came in a pile of material from a
>DG Nova system.
>From www.filetek.com:
William C. Thompson and John Burgess founded FileTek in 1984 to
address the need for making very large volumes of offline
information accessible to online users of mainframes
minicomputers, and networked workstations. They firmly believed
that historic detail has an increased value when organizations can
access and use it productively.
In 1987, FileTek introduced its first product, Storage Machine/1, a
shared client/server-based, automatically managed storage server.
This innovative data server used sophisticated storage management
software to control a storage hierarchy of magnetic disk and write
once read many (WORM) optical technology.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>>>It would be really nice if this software just asked the end user to load a
>>>paper tape, then huit return, and it sends the data read out a separate
>>>serial port, then prompts to load the next one.
>
>>What sort of paper tape reader are you using? If it's a serial reader,
>>you can hook it straight up to a PC-clone running MS-DOS and MS-Kermit
>>(or Linux and C-Kermit) and archive the tapes that way. Both MS-Kermit
>>and C-Kermit include powerful scripting languages.
>PC05 with a PC11 controller.
OK, you can hook the PC05 up to a PC, but you'd have to do some re-wiring
and write the simple code to read it. If you've already got a running RT-11
system with the PC11 in it up and running, it's probably easier if
you use Kermit on the RT end and a Kermit script on the PC-clone to
do the automation and user prompting.
OTOH I could run all the tapes through the machinery here in a few days,
as well. It's too bad that you have to do it all in just a few days
before they're gone, setting up the automation on your end with your equipment
sounds like it might end up taking most of your allotted time, when such
archiving (ideally) shouldn't be done in such a rush.
How many feet total are we talking about, 10 thousand feet, 30 thousand
feet, 100 thousand feet? Remember than 10 thousand feet is (approximately)
1.2 megabytes, and takes a bit more than an hour if you can run it
continuously through a PC05's 300 char/sec reader.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Does anyone have any pointers to sites on the web which cover Altos
machines? I've done a search on Yahoo and a couple of other places and
turned up nothing.
I'm particularly interested in information on the Unix systems they were
making around 1990 - we had one at work, an i386 in a tower case. Not PC
compatible IIRC, possibly called an "Altos III" or something similar.
While I'm on the subject, would anyone in the UK have one of these they want
rid of?
TTFN - Pete.
--
Hardware & Software Engineer. Sound Engineer.
Collector of Arcade Machines, Games Consoles & Obsolete Computers (esp DEC)
peter.pachla(a)wintermute.org.uk | www.wintermute.org.uk
--
I have somewhere a GAO report that lists the problems, lifetimes, and
quantities of data that the US government has on different magnetic media.
IIRC the big problem with magentic media is that it is never stored in the
correct environmental conditions that provide optimum lifetimes. They
included pictures of piles of 9-track tapes of LANDSAT data, some of the
stacks were used to block open the door to the tape library. Humidity and
heat are big problems for tape.
Here are several references about data storage and media
Preserving Digital Objects: Recurrent Needs and Challenges. Michael Lesk.
Bellcore. Abstract. We do not know today what Mozart sounded like on the...
URL: www.lesk.com/mlesk/auspres/aus.html
. Effects of Humidity on Life Expectancy of Media. Long-Term Preservation of
Dig <http://www.safesupplies.com/article1.html>
Long-Term Preservation of Digital Materials. Dr. John W.C. Van
Bogart National Media Laboratory. Presented at the National Preservation
Office (NPO)...
URL: www.safesupplies.com/article1.htmlhttp://www.cclabs.missouri.edu/~ccgreg/tapes.html
Magnetic Tape and Digital Media Life Expectancies
Preservation of New Technology
<http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byauth/lesk/lesk2.html>
...as digital media, DAT cartridges, 9-track tape in...
...example, half-inch 9-track magnetic tape densities have...
palimpsest.stanford.edu/byauth/lesk/lesk2.html - Cached
</search?q=cache:palimpsest.stanford.edu/byauth/lesk/lesk2.html> - 58k -
GoogleScout
</search?num=10&q=related:palimpsest.stanford.edu/byauth/lesk/lesk2.html>
I think that the September 1995 issue of Scientific American had an article
about preserving digital data.
Mike
>> The 3.5" square (exactly) daughter board plugs directly into and
>> only into where the Z80 CPU normally resides. The board contains:
>> Z80 CPU, AM25LS252IPC, 2 x SN74LS245N, SN74LS00N, 74F32PC chips
>> with assorted resistors etc. There is a 26 way berg connector to
>> take the cable to the IEEE-488 port. Also there is a 8-way link
>> box with 5 unbroken links, 2 broken links and 1 remade link.
> I don't like to say things like this, but I think I am justified...
>'Impossible!'
> You've got an address decoder (AM25LS2521 == 74LS688 IIRC), a
> couple of bidirectional bus buffers ('245s), and a few gates ('00
> NANDs and '32 ORs). What you don't have is any form of latch, which
> is what you'd need for an output port. Since the IEEE-488 bus can
> run a lot more slowly than the Z80 bus, it's going to need such
> latches, at least for output. There are several possibilites.
> Either you've missed out some chips (like '374s, or even a true
> IEEE-488 chip like the 9914 or 7210). Or this is _not_ the IEEE-488
> option. I suspect the latter, actually. I would be very suprised if
> the RML IEE-488 option was a daughtercard that fitted under the
> CPU. Everything I can find out about it suggests it's a normal Z50
> bus card. This sounds like some kind of bus buffering/extension
> card, sort of like the IDE interface (although obviously
> incompatable with the PC type of IDE). Are you sure this is not
> some kind of strange winchester interface. It could well be the
> host adapter for (say) a WD1001 card or something like that.
Please feel free to say 'impossible' - my knowledge of electronics
at this level is minimal. I will now write out 100 times 'Failure
to pay due regard to warnings repeatedly given, brings in its train
dire consequences which might easily been avoided by the use of a
little self restraint' (school line). As you have pointed out
whatever this is, the person who installed it just made use of
the convenient sized hole marked IEEE port. Nothing which
came with the equipment (originally from Oxford University,
then from Biomechanical Engineering at UWCM (University of
Wales, College of Medicine), used that port.
Doug.
>I am spending all my time right now packing and rackmounting - I have no
>time to write anything. I will have some people come over and feed in the
>paper tape this weekend. While I won't be able to archive most of it, I do
>hope to at least read in most of the source code on paper tape. (I have over
>310 PDP-1 paper tapes alone).
>
>This program needs to be *very* easy to use and hopefully supports
>X/Y-MODEM. I will set up a terminal program at this end that supports 32
>character file names (windows 98). This program would have to run under
>RT11-V3B, or RT11V4 BL. Hopefully it would send the code down a serial line
>separate serial port.
Umm, what's wrong with Kermit? The latest Kermit for RT does just fine under
RT-11 V4, and Kermit is available for just about every other piece
of hardware ever created. See ftp://kermit.columbia.edu/
>It would be really nice if this software just asked the end user to load a
>paper tape, then huit return, and it sends the data read out a separate
>serial port, then prompts to load the next one.
What sort of paper tape reader are you using? If it's a serial reader,
you can hook it straight up to a PC-clone running MS-DOS and MS-Kermit
(or Linux and C-Kermit) and archive the tapes that way. Both MS-Kermit
and C-Kermit include powerful scripting languages.
Remember, you *don't* have to start from scratch, others of us have
been archiving this sort of stuff for many years.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
--- "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com> wrote:
> Personally, when and if mine ever shows up at CC, then I'll be paying with
> *cash*.
Don't sweat it. NP has already said that only units ordered directly
>from them are subject to automatic account activation on the credit card
that ordered it. Fair or not; legal or not; that is their policy. Units
ordered through CC are not activated until plugged into the phone system
and turned on. After all, they ship those whenever and they sit around
at CC until they are bought (if they weren't 1000's of units backlogged ;-)
There's no way to regulate that.
The bad news is that NP is explictly shipping to direct customers in
preference to CC customers. Mine is still on backorder through CC and
likely will be for weeks. I'm number 10 out of 100 at my store alone.
There are six stores within driving distance. They have received two
units in two weeks. :-(
The only good news is that units with a 21-Mar-2000 manufacture date appear
to be unmodified. Who knows what the future may bring. For the $106 mine
will cost (with tax), I'll take the risk that I have to remove epoxy or
solder in a header.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
OK, I've got a wierd question now. What is the lifespan of Magnetic Media?
In this case, I'm concerned about 4mm DAT, but since I'm more familiar with
8mm it as an example.
Let's say I've got a stack of 8mm tapes with data on them. They're
supposed to be good for archival purposes, when stored in the proper
conditions for 2 years.
Now let's say I've got a brand new box of 8mm tapes that have been sitting
around still sealed for 8 years. Again, they've been stored in the proper
conditions more or less. So are they still good? Is the 2 year number for
their ability to hold data, or the actual physical lifespan. Anyone have
any ideas?
The real reason for the question is finding some 4mm tapes that are still
sealed, and I'd estimate about 8 years old.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
On Mar 30, 15:25, healyzh(a)aracnet.com wrote:
> > I think the 2 year is for reasonable useage.
>
> Actually the 2 year number is from a government study that I don't
believe
> is still online :^( It was refering to writing the data to tape and then
> sticking the tape in a vault. In other words an archive tape. They
found
> 8mm was good for 2 years, while DLT and 9-Track tapes were good for 10
> years.
>
> > New tapes should last for 30 to 40 years at least
> > with good storage. Tapes with data may not fare as well.
That seems logical to me. I wonder how much of the apparent data loss is
due to print-through? I was told that tapes ought to be rewound every year
or two to minimise the print-through effect. The idea is that by doing so,
you change the overlap between layers on the spool, and the effects cancel
out to some extent.
Having said that, I've just been reading some old cassette tapes on my
Exidy Sorcerer. I sold my original Sorcerer (and associated tapes) 20
years ago, but got a replacement (with no tapes at all) for my collection
recently. Last weekend, a friend brought me some tapes he'd found from
his, unused since 1980. I've managed to read every program I've tried so
far -- about a dozen -- on the four tapes I've tried. In a couple of
cases, I got errors on the first read, but no problem on the second. I
think that's probably due to the tape being more evenly wound/tensioned
after playing through and rewinding once, a common effect in compact
cassettes as I recall.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On March 29, Technoid(a)cheta.net wrote:
> I have tried the 'n' command and it says it is not a command. If I enter
> "new" it responds "cpu cache enabled" which is not what I wanted at all.
> Is it possible this Sparcstation 330 (sparc 4/300) does not have the 'new'
> prompt at all? --
Nope...of all the models in the sun4/xxx family, only the 4/6xx has
OpenFirmware. The 4/1xx, 4/2xx, 4/3xx, and 4/4xx have sun3-style "old
mode" only.
-Dave McGuire
Bill and I spent the morning sorting through the Altos stuff we
had rescued, and this is what we think we have:
Altos 5 Box, Z-80 CPU, bunch of serial ports, two 5.25" floppy drives.
Also a binder full of Altos 5 documentation.
Altos 8000 Boxes (2 of them), Z-80 CPU's, bunch of serial ports, 8"
floppy drives, and a binder full of accompanying documentation.
Altos 68000 Boxes (3 of them), 68000 CPU's, one of the boxes has an
expansion board filled with RAM, two of the boxes have 8" hard drives,
all of the boxes have an 8" floppy drive, one of the boxes is missing
the panel on the back filled with serial ports.
We also have lots of Altos 8" software distribution floppies.
Condition is unknown. Some of the boxes have stickers from ten years
ago indicating that they were (at least partly) functioning back then,
but we haven't powered any of this stuff on.
Anyone interested? We will consider shipping these to a good home, though
we'd prefer to find local (Washington DC area) takers. You don't
have to take them all, you can pick and choose if you wish.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Whilst digging out some 380Z manuals I found a "Prime 2455" I'd forgotten I
had....
I'd like to have a bash at getting this going, but aside from needing OS
tapes (anyone help PLEASE?) the tape drive and hard drive have been removed
along with some sort of drive mounting tray.
Can anyone tell me what types/capacities of hard drive I can fit to this
machine, and what model of tape drive does it take (all I know is that the
tape and hard drives are SCSI devices)?
Also, I *NEED* the mounting tray/stage which fits inside the top of the
machine to which the drives attach. Anyone in the UK in a position to help?
TTFN - Pete.
--
Hardware & Software Engineer. Sound Engineer.
Collector of Arcade Machines, Games Consoles & Obsolete Computers (esp DEC)
peter.pachla(a)wintermute.org.uk | www.wintermute.org.uk
--
On Mar 30, 22:30, Olminkhof wrote:
> I do this and get:
>
> 147470
> @
>
> Further iterations all result in:
>
> 173000
> @
>
> If I hit restart at any time after that there is a some disk activity and
> eventually and "&" prompt appears.
The first address is in RAM, which is interesting. It suggests the
processor is executing some bootstrap that gets copied into memory. 173000
is the standard bootstrap address; every time you restart the CPU, it sets
the program counter to that address. The "&" is not any normal PDP-11
prompt, so that must have come from the disk or custom boot roms.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 30, 19:25, Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk wrote:
> This is only on topic at all because I shall be using a classic computer
for
> it...
>
> I understand that some mobile telephones nowadays can download tunes to
play
> when they ring. Can anybody point me to (a) the download protocol(s)
that the
> phones use and (b) the file format(s) for these tunes?
Yes, several Nokia, Ericsson, and Siemens models can download tunes, and a
few can be programmed in other ways with a data cable. One place to start
might be
http://www.cellulartips.com/index.html
but there are lots of other sites around. You'll find a lot of information
by using AltaVista, or DejaNews to search the uk.telecom newgroups as well
(look for "nokia" and "data"), eg
http://www.gadgets.demon.co.uk/nokia61xx/
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
This is only on topic at all because I shall be using a classic computer for
it...
I understand that some mobile telephones nowadays can download tunes to play
when they ring. Can anybody point me to (a) the download protocol(s) that the
phones use and (b) the file format(s) for these tunes?
Philip.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
Power Technology Centre, Ratcliffe-on-Soar,
Nottingham, NG11 0EE, UK
Tel: +44 (0)115 936 2000
http://www.powertech.co.uk
**********************************************************************
> realise there was an analogue I/O card for the 380Z. I've got no
> info on the winchester and network cards, but I guessed they must
> have existed. IIRC at least one of the RML winchester systems was a
> box about the size of a 380Z with a PSU, ST506-interfaced drive and
> a SASI-ST506 interface card. I assume the 380Z interface was a SASI
> host adapter or something.
The 3rd. party winchester disk unit measures 16" x 16" x 4.5" and the
cover (top and sides) is a beige type plastic with rounded corners
(radius about 1") on the top of the sides; sitting on a metal base/
font/back. It has the wiring for two 5.25" FH disk drives but contains
only one Rodime RO 100 (4 platters/8 heads/192 cylinders). The
interface card in the disk unit is a 'Konan David Jr. II'. As I
mentioned this has never worked. The instructions for running up
the hard disk (given verbally to me) was to insert the floppy
containing the executable x and to type x - Found the floppy,
typed the command - nothing, although the disk does whirr quite
happily, it doesn't seek.
> I'd always assumed that the IEEE-488 card was a card that connected
> to the bus cable. Are you saying that it's a daughterboard that
> fits under the Z80 or something?
The 3.5" square (exactly) daughter board plugs directly into and
only into where the Z80 CPU normally resides. The board contains:
Z80 CPU, AM25LS252IPC, 2 x SN74LS245N, SN74LS00N, 74F32PC chips
with assorted resistors etc. There is a 26 way berg connector to
take the cable to the IEEE-488 port. Also there is a 8-way link
box with 5 unbroken links, 2 broken links and 1 remade link.
> Do you happen to have schematics other than the ones that appear in
> the normal Information File.
Sorry, no schematics
Doug.
Since alt.sys.pdp10 is in a big flamewar right now, I guess I'll ask here.
Does anyone know the correct geomerty of an RP04 pack in 18-bit mode?
I have it as 19 heads, 411 cylinders, and 20 sectors a track, with 260
word sectors. (18 bit words, 256 data words and 4 header words.)
I think that's wrong though.
-------
My entire collection was purchased by a *very* large corporation. Details
will probably be PR'd later this month. I have a lot of source code and
PDP-1 software that does not exist anywhere. I would like to back up this
material in case of damage in shipping, and it should be made available to
all.
I am spending all my time right now packing and rackmounting - I have no
time to write anything. I will have some people come over and feed in the
paper tape this weekend. While I won't be able to archive most of it, I do
hope to at least read in most of the source code on paper tape. (I have over
310 PDP-1 paper tapes alone).
This program needs to be *very* easy to use and hopefully supports
X/Y-MODEM. I will set up a terminal program at this end that supports 32
character file names (windows 98). This program would have to run under
RT11-V3B, or RT11V4 BL. Hopefully it would send the code down a serial line
separate serial port.
I will only have this software here until Wednesday April 5,2000 (5 days).
It would be really nice if this software just asked the end user to load a
paper tape, then huit return, and it sends the data read out a separate
serial port, then prompts to load the next one.
Please e-mail me at: dylanb(a)sympatico.ca .
P.S. Most wishlist items were set aside before this offer to purchase so I
will be able to ship them soon.
P.P.S I bought a DSI to do this but it got seriously damaged in shipping - I
have no time to fix it.
john
Thanks to all for the advice so far.
I now have the terminal connection working again at least.
>
>Try connecting directly to the 10-pin connector on the left side of the
>MXV11, start it up, and hit the HALT button. You should get an address and
>an ODT prompt. You should get another prompt every time you press RUN, if
>HALT is still pressed in. Assuming the panel is connected to the backplane
>correctly.
>
I do this and get:
147470
@
Further iterations all result in:
173000
@
If I hit restart at any time after that there is a some disk activity and
eventually and "&" prompt appears. The keyboard doesn't respond and nothing
seems to happen in a reasonable time after that.
I consulted the original owner who reports that it definitely went through a
self test routine on the screen and did this before the linked PDP8 was
started, so there's a hardware problem somewhere.
Anyway I'm streets ahead with the info from Aaron Finneys scans which I will
now study. I plan to reseat all the roms and cards and check all the jumper
settings.
Thanks all,
Hans
Hi,
Just a quick note to let everyone know that I (somehow) managed to add a
few more docs to my page at http://www.retrobytes.org.
Since my last announcement, I've added an HP section (sparse yet), some
more RT-11 docs, some MicroPDP docs, an SWP section, etc...
Cheers,
Aaron
On Mar 28, 12:38, Dwight Elvey wrote:
> It is OK to call the 'ok' the open-boot prompt.
I knew it had a proper name, but I didn't remember until later. Some of us
still regularly call it "the new prompt" :-)
> Forth is the hardware
> persons secret tool, don't tell software types, they won't understand.
Oh, I don't know. I've got software written in Forth, such as my PAL
assembler. Though come to think of it, that's not really a software type's
thing, is it.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Well . . . after another few more hours of exploration :
The M8059 YA card wasn't that at all. It is actually an M8639 YA.
I need glasses . . and stronger light.
Anyway, Control C doesn't work and I can no longer repeat getting to an @
prompt, instead getting a lot of backward ? characters at times.
I'm now using the console port but have lost confidence in the terminal and
serial cable completely. I discovered the baud setting control for the ports
after I blew the dust out of the little window. Set the port to 4800 baud,
the default setting on the VT220. All for no consistent result. Tried 110
baud on both with no result
I switched to a straight though 25 wire serial cable and got absolutely no
communication, . . added a null modem and got a little garbage . . changed
>from the default VT200 mode 7 bit controls to some of the others . . . all
to no result.
I think the PDP is booting OK judging by the sounds it makes but there is
nothing on the terminal screen. The terminal seems to do everything OK when
in local mode.
I have another VT220 tucked away. Trying that is all I can think of at this
point. I should see something on the screen even if the hard drive or OS
have a problem shouldn't I?
Is there a PDP11's for Dummies book?
Hans
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, 29 March 2000 17:45
Subject: Re: PDP11/23 More dumb questions
>On Mar 28, 15:25, CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
>> >> >M7195
>> >>
>> >> 128 kbyte RAM
>>
>> >It's actually a MXV11-B Multifunction card, with 128KB RAM, and ...
>>
>> >> It's also particularly confusing, because you evidently have no serial
>> >> line cards nor disk controllers in the backplane. I have no idea
>> >> how you even got the ODT prompt out of the machine.
>>
>> >... the MXV11-B has two SLUs, of the same type as a DLV11.
>>
>> Yeah, that makes more sense. I still don't know how his machine is
>> supposed to boot from disk without a disk controller, though!
>
>Ah, that's the magic part :-)
>
>--
>
>Pete Peter Turnbull
> Dept. of Computer Science
> University of York
>
--- Aaron Christopher Finney <af-list(a)wfi-inc.com> wrote:
> No extra cable...but I do have the RS422 standard pinout handy...
I've got the pinout of the camera from the Apple tech support web site.
What I was confused about is what signals get wired to what signals for
RS-422. I've been making RS-232 cables for 10 years, but without a cable
diagram, I've never made a Mac cable.
>
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
> > So... does anyone out there have a Mac "null-modem" cable they'd like to
> > get rid of?
I've also found out that this *exact* cable (down to the icon) is used to
connect a Newton to a Mac. Any Newt users out there (in the States, Hans ;-)
that have a source for cables?
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello, fellow scroungers,
After having formatted my system drive in error, I am putting back in my
tape backup unit.
I have gobs of 150 meg and 250 meg tapes, but am in need of 525 meg tapes
----------- DC6525 ---------
for less that retail price (which at last report was $20-30 a pop).
I would appreciate any leads . . . .
Gary Hildebrand
I have been using a Zax in-circuit debugger and it has recently stopped
working. As best as I can tell, the Zax corporation is no longer in
existence. I'd like to either have my unit repaired or find a
replacement. Any help out there?
klager(a)execpc.com
>Are you using a 1.2MB floppy drive to write a 360K floppy disk?
Yes, but I used the drive (1.2Mb) to format it to 360K.
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, 1541, FSD-1, GeoRAM 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
"Spectrum": Tandy Color Computer 3.
"Boombox": Sharp PC-7000.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Mar 30, 0:17, Olminkhof wrote:
> Anyway, Control C doesn't work and I can no longer repeat getting to an
@
> prompt, instead getting a lot of backward ? characters at times.
> I'm now using the console port but have lost confidence in the terminal
and
> serial cable completely. I discovered the baud setting control for the
ports
> after I blew the dust out of the little window. Set the port to 4800
baud,
> the default setting on the VT220. All for no consistent result. Tried 110
> baud on both with no result
If the system is using the SLUs on the MXV11-B, the little window is
meaningless, as the baud rate etc on the MXV11 has to be set by rejumpering
several links, often with wire wrap. There's no handy way of connecting a
selector switch.
> I switched to a straight though 25 wire serial cable and got absolutely
no
> communication, . . added a null modem and got a little garbage . .
changed
> from the default VT200 mode 7 bit controls to some of the others . . .
all
> to no result.
Try connecting directly to the 10-pin connector on the left side of the
MXV11, start it up, and hit the HALT button. You should get an address and
an ODT prompt. You should get another prompt every time you press RUN, if
HALT is still pressed in. Assuming the panel is connected to the backplane
correctly.
The MXV11-B only supports 300/1200/9600/38400 baud. J9,J10,J11 control the
setting for SLU0, J7,J8,J9 control SLU1 (the console port). 9600 is J9 to
J10, and J8 to J9. J61 to J62 forces SLU1 to be the console.
It's also possible that you have some kind of custom bootstrap in it.
MXV11-Bs were sometimes sold without boot ROMs (the standrd ROM set is
known as the B2 ROM set, and marked as such), and use the same software
arrangement as the MRV11-D ROM board, so people were able to roll their own
using information in the MRV11-D manual.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 29, 13:41, Bill Pechter wrote:
> > In article <00ce01bf990a$26953aa0$03e893c3@proteus>, Peter Pachla
> > <peter.pachla(a)wintermute.org.uk> writes
> > I have an external tape drive which I am told came from a Prime of some
> > sort which you can have. I don't know what sort of tape it takes as I
> > didn't get any with it. Perhaps someone else on the list could say
> > whether it is any use to you. It has no external markings except for a
> > sticker showing that it passed statutory testing in 1988. The drive
> > itself is an Exabyte Model EXB 8200, does anyone recognise this?
> It's an 8mm 112M Exabyte... www.exabyte.com. Works great with any
> SCSI single ended (usually) interface.
I have two here, one sold originally as a PDP-11/83 add-on, and one from a
Pr1me. I upgraded the firmware in the older one using code from
www.exabyte.com, and both work very nicely on my Unix machines and an Acorn
Archimedes. They don't do compression and the standard 8200 doesn't have
the high-speed search that the 8200S has, but they handle a reasonable data
rate and hold around 2.2GB per tape. Lots of people use 8mm video tape; I
prefer to use proper data cartridges, though.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Went the the Hamfest at the Motorola Factory in Plantation (western Ft.
Lauderdale) last weekend. From what I understand, it used to be a regular
event but, now it's held infrequently. There were quite a few sellers there
but, not too much computer stuff.
I found a micro-based controller for $10. Looks like it was used for some
kinda automated inspection or manufacturing system. The system consisted of
4 large wire-wrapped boards and 4 fairly large power supplies. There was
some damage to the innards so, I bought it strictly for the parts. Got a ton
of TTL devices and other goodies out of it.
Also found a "NIDA" Counter / Timer. It's an educational tool used to teach
digital logic. It's in great condition considering it came from the school
board. In my experience, most of the stuff from the schools is pretty beat
up. Anyway, it's very cool and only cost me $5.
I had other comittments so only stayed until 8:00 AM. At that time, sellers
and buyers were still filing in. Probably missed some good stuff but, oh
well...
Later,
Steve Robertson <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
>
> We stayed at the meet for about an hour or so, and decided
> that we had had
> enough of the wall to wall people. I had fun but I doubt that
> I'll go again,
> unless I learn more about ham radio stuff. I'll hold out for a vintage
> computer fest instead.
>
> Ernest
On Mar 28, 15:25, CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
> >> >M7195
> >>
> >> 128 kbyte RAM
>
> >It's actually a MXV11-B Multifunction card, with 128KB RAM, and ...
>
> >> It's also particularly confusing, because you evidently have no serial
> >> line cards nor disk controllers in the backplane. I have no idea
> >> how you even got the ODT prompt out of the machine.
>
> >... the MXV11-B has two SLUs, of the same type as a DLV11.
>
> Yeah, that makes more sense. I still don't know how his machine is
> supposed to boot from disk without a disk controller, though!
Ah, that's the magic part :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 28, 19:14, Tony Duell wrote:
> The other thing is that when 96 tpi drives were in common use, some
(lesser)
> manufactuerers fitted the narrow head to all drives (even 48 tpi ones!).
> Or at least some system builders/OEMs did. I have heard rumours that a
> well-known BBC micro supplier sold 40 track, 80 track, and 40/80
> switchable drives. They were actually all the same (80 track, 96 tpi)
> mechanisms. The '40 track' ones had been modified to double-step, and the
> switchable ones had this mod controlled by the switch.
Canon mechanisms, by any chance? or Chinon?
> Needless to say, these '40 track' drives can correctly read '40 track'
> disks that have been overwritten by 96 tpi drives (since the head in such
> a drive only 'sees' the narrower 96-tpi-like track anyway), but what they
> can't do is overwrite disks formatted or written on real 48 tpi drives.
> Don't ask how I got to sort this out!
Yuk! I can imagine :-)
> The other question, of course, is how reliable do you need it to be.
>
> For example, the last time I wrote a 40 track disk in an 80 track (96
> tpi) drive was when I wrote a TRS-80 Model 4 boot disk on this linux box
> (which has a 1.2Mbyte 96 tpi drive). I did the following :
yes, i do things like that quite often. But not for anything I want to
keep (not the one written in the 80-track drive, anyway) because you never
know if the drive you use next year will be the same...
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Altos machines came in several generations.
1st Generation
Altos 5-ZZ where ZZ was the size of the HD. These were Z80 machines with 5
1/4 inch drives. These are small rectangular desktop boxes.
Altos 8XXX-ZZ was a large heavy rectangular desktop box with Z80s or 68000
CPUs. These were generally multiuser machines. ZZ again refers to the size of
the 8" HD(10=10 Meg, 12=20 Meg, 14=40 Meg HDs). They used a large custom
single board computer the size of the case. The drive controller was a
separate half card mounted on top of the SBC. The early 8000s had separate
cases for the 8" FD & HD. In later models the drives and cards were
integrated in the same case. I think the 68000 processor machines were
labeled 68XX-ZZ but it has been too long to be sure. I also think the 68000
machines ran an early version of Xenix. You could get them in versions up to
9 users and a supervisor.
2nd Generation
Altos 5XX & 6XX class machines. These looked like squashed hexagons, flat on
the bottom and top with two angles on each side. These were medium sized
desktop cases, usually beige but often came in custom colors. They carried on
the two circuit card configuration. Large SBC with secondary drive controller
card.
Altos 580 was my favorite. Half height floppy and St 225 20 Meg HD with a Z80
and ran 4 terminals under MPM. They would also run CPM. These also came with
FH 10 & 15 Meg HDs
Altos 586 came with a 40 meg FHHD and the new 8086 processor and was a 6 user
machine. These often ran Xenix and were password protected.
While I never had one I think the 686 series machines had the 68000 processor
and ran Xenix.
These were all squashed Hexagonal shaped machines. I think this line went up
to 9XX series numbers with greater amounts of users.
3rd Generation
Then there were the Brown floor towers, Altos II & III. These were multiple
card towers for large amounts of users. These had 80286 and 80386 processors.
I believe there were machines that continued the 680xx processor line too. I
only had a couple of these.
The Altos II terminal is a rebadged Wyse 100 and the Altos III was a Wyse 50.
I think the Altos IV was a Wyse 60 but I am not sure at the moment.
Paxton
On Mar 26, 16:16, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> I'm not sure I am the one who should wake up here. I would repeat "It
> doesn't matter whether the diskette is a 1.2 MB one or a 360K type" but
it
> does depend what sort of drive it is.
No, Fred is right. There are plenty of drives designed to use single
density or double density disks at 96 tpi, and disks cerified for such use,
and they work perfectly reliably for 80 tracks, SD or DD. Historically,
such drives predate 1.2M (HD) drives. Provided you use SD/DD media in a
drive using the correct write current, and providing there isn't any other
leftover rubbish for the wider heads in a 48 tpi drive, any reasonably
well-aligned 48 tpi will handle those disks just fine. However, no 48 tpi
drive I have ever heard of is designed to use HD 1.2M media, and if you try
it, it will give trouble sooner or later. All the evidence indicates that
the major factor is the magnetic coercivity of the media.
> [...] the fact that the heads designed for 48tpi will write a
> significantly wider swath on
> the diskette than the 96tpi drive can erase. Consequently, and I'll bet
> you've had this experience, you can format a bulk erased diskette to
48tpi
> with a 96 TPI drive and have it work for a while.
>
> The more the diskette is written, by the 48tpi drive, the harder it
becomes
> for the 96tpi drive to erase its writing,
Again, no. Providing you're only reading back the part overwritten by the
96 tpi drive, this is not true. It only matters if you both write with 48
tpi, overwrite with 96 tpi, and then try to read back with a 48 tpi drive
-- which is not what was being discussed. And it doesn't make any
difference whether the 48 tpi drive writes once or one thousand times, the
magnetic field strength is the same!
> and, of course, the 48TPI drive
> will have the most trouble because the signal not erased in the 96tpi
drive
> is perceived by the 48tpi drive as noise, while the signal written by the
> 96tpi is written at a lower level to begin with, since the drive relies
on
> the higher coercivity of the medium to generate a larger signal amplitude
if
> that factor is to come into play at all.
No, it doesn't rely on the higher coercivity, not when it's writing single
or double density. It only does that for High Density.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
At 20:39 12-03-2000 -0800, John Lawson dared me to...
> So... where's the detailed Swap Meet Report????
>
> We're waiting...
>PS: Post to The List if you dare... :)
Ok, I dare. ;-)
The Puyallup swap this year was quite crowded compared with last year. I
managed to sell a bunch of stuff that I didn't think I would, and some
stuff that I thought would sell (almost) didn't.
For the record, I sold all the Exabyte drives (the 8500's are holding here
for checks from the purchasers -- thanks, guys!) and the small UPS I had. I
don't think any of the buyers (with three exceptions) were classiccmp'ers,
but all business was appreciated.
There were equal amounts of joy and irritation with this year's event. On
the 'joy' side was, certainly, good sales. Add to that my finding of not
one, but TWO Amp 'Butterfly' tools (if you don't know what one is, you'll
have trouble appreciating it), plus some spare batteries for the pair of
radios I use for SwapComm and a nice mid-80's vintage Amprobe clamp-on AC
meter, and I think I did pretty well.
On the irritation side. One fellow showed up with a beautiful mil-spec HF
receiver. Those of you familiar with the radio side of things will likely
recognize the designation of R-2174(P)/URR, a.k.a. the Racal 6790. It was
in great shape, came with its manual and power cord, and had a sticker
price of $1,275.
Those of you who know this receiver will know immediately that this is a
bit exorbitant. In prime shape, they're worth about a grand, and that's
what I offered the fellow for it (knowing full well that I'd be going into
debt for six months to pay it off!).
He insisted on waiting until the end of the day. However, at day's end, I
came back to find him wrapping it up. Upon asking what was up, he told me
(rather brusquely) that someone had paid him $2,000 in CASH for it.
Initially, I was stunned. Not only was that over twice what the unit was
worth, but it astounded me that ANYone would be (a) walking around with two
grand in cash in their pocket, and (b) would use it to buy a mid-80's HF
receiver, however nice.
I walked away from that one fuming. In retrospect, and after talking to a
friend of mine, it is now my firm belief that the owner was lying through
his teeth in an effort to cover the fact that no one had been willing to
pay his outrageous sticker price. Here's why I think this.
1). He was wrapping the receiver up as if to ship it. If someone was crazy
enough to pay $2K for that unit, said buyer would have taken it with them
ON THE SPOT.
2). The seller's attitude throughout the day was loud, obnoxious, and
forceful on trying to sell things. Too forceful, in fact. He wouldn't
dicker beyond a certain point, and he seemed borderline arrogant in every
dealing he had with those around him. From what I could tell, he sold very
little that day.
3). His body language, as he was wrapping up the receiver, was most
definitely NOT that of someone who'd just closed a two-grand sale. It was
more along the lines of "I'm taking my ball and going HOME! To blazes with
this whole mess!!"
Anyway, that's about it. I deposited more back into the bank than I took
out to cover my purchases, so I think I did pretty well. Eric Smith came by
on Sunday to pick up the DSD-880's I had for him, plus some other goodies,
and it was he who bought my last Exabyte drive. Eric, if you're reading
this, thanks again and enjoy!
Guess I'll just have to do it again next year. Heck, I might rent a table
just to get in early. Let's hope that, if someone has a similar receiver
next year, they'll be more serious about selling it at a reasonable price.
Caveat (burp) Emperor!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
>> IIRC at least one of the RML winchester systems was a box about the size
>> of a 380Z with a PSU, ST506-interfaced drive and a SASI-ST506 interface
>> card. I assume the 380Z interface was a SASI host adapter or something.
that sounds like what I maybe have.... never seen a 380Z so I don't
know. I've got five or six 480Z machines though, three or four of them
with network interfaces, and then two big black metal cabinets - one
houses the hard drive, and from memory the other contains either
controller logic or floppy drives (these things have been sitting in
sotrage for the last 4 years, so it's been a while since I've seen
them!)
pretty nifty stuff though, I must dig them all out again some day...
(they were given to me along with my Diamond wordprocessor, which was
the main find, so I only ever powered up the 480's to check that they
could talk to the disk unit before they got stored...)
someday I will have the time and space to fire these things up again and
have a serious play around with them...
cheers
Jules
>
On Mar 28, 11:51, CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
> On Mar 28, 20:15, Olminkhof wrote:
> >The cards are, from one end:
> >M7195
>
> 128 kbyte RAM
It's actually a MXV11-B Multifunction card, with 128KB RAM, and ...
> >M8067
>
> Another 128 kbyte RAM
Or maybe 256K
> It's also particularly confusing, because you evidently have no serial
> line cards nor disk controllers in the backplane. I have no idea
> how you even got the ODT prompt out of the machine.
... the MXV11-B has two SLUs, of the same type as a DLV11. It also has a
bootstrap (usually) which is vaguely similar to some of the 11/23+ ad early
11/73 bootstraps, and an LTC. And a million jumper posts. I have a
document listing their names/functions somewhere online, if you need it.
> There seem to be some (slight) behavioural differences depending on which
> serial port I plug the terminal into.
Well, the one on the left of the card, looking into it from the back, is
the console line, if that helps.
> I'm unclear about the switches and lights, but I have the run light on,
the
> DC light on, the fixed disk write protect switch out and it's red light
out,
> and the fixed disk ready switch out with it's green light on.
Well, that should be running. As Tim noted, there isn't a disk controller
in your list, though. I'd expect an RQDX1 or maybe RQDX2 in that machine
-- more likely an RQDX1 if the drive is an RD50. If there isn't, it won't
do much. It might be worth trying to connect a terminal to the console SLU
and seein what happens when you start it. You can break into the bootstrap
routine using ctrl-C if necessary.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Picked up a next turbocolor station early this week and it powers up but is password protected, anyone know a quick way around this ? Thanks in advance John
On Mar 27, 18:44, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> > On Mar 27, 19:57, Tony Duell wrote:
> > > fact behaves like the second type above -- a 98tpi (80 cylinder)
drive
> Surely you mean 96 tpi . . . right?
I'm sure that was just a typo on Tony's part :-)
> I'm curious ... How do you "set" a
> 1.2MB drive to behave as a 720-K drive, i.e. use that type of medium? It
> seems to me that, at a minimum, the controller would have to be seriously
> involved as well.
Assuming the HD drive is correctly jumpered, you simply get the controller
to put a low signal on pin 2 (density) of the interface. On most drives,
that will also change the speed from 360 rpm to 300; on others, not.
> > Furthermore, the media used in 96 tpi standard density disks is, in my
> > experience, the same as that used in 48 tpi standard density disks. It
> > even says so in my CDC drive manuals. However, as we all (ought to)
know,
> > the media for HD disks is very different.
> >
> The fact remains that there are diskettes specifically designated as
being
> 96TPI-certified, "QD" presumably for quad density, since you get twice as
> many tracks as with a double density diskette, which were, originally
sold
> at a higher price than the "360K"
Indeed, and I have lots like that, ie either "certified for 96 tpi" or in
a few cases, "QD". However, the differential is partly marketing, and
partly because manufacturers often tested 96 tpi disks more carefully for
microscopic blemishes -- a tiny defect might cause a disk to be rejected
for 96 tpi, but pass a test for 48 tpi. Many (most?) manufacturers used
exactly the same media/emulsion for both types -- I know for a fact that
Dysan and Verbatim did, although I also know that Dysan at one time made
disks that looked slightly different, and presumably those did use a
slighlty different coating.
> > > According to all the data I can find (which is not much), the centre
> > lines
> > > of the 48tpi tracks and the centre lines of alternate 96tpi tracks
> > > coincide. This means (amongst other things) that you can use the same
> > > alignment disk for both types of drive.
> >
> This would follow but for the technique used for writing radial alignment
> tracks.
I don't follow -- the instructions for my Shugart and Dysan alignment disks
clearly state that the disk is suitable for both 96 tpi and 48 tpi drives,
and lists the apropriate track numbers for the various tests, such as the
cats-eyes alignment test (and, yes, the track number for 96 tpi is simply
double the number for 48 tpi in each case).
> results I had and observed in others' lack of success certainly support
the
> belief that the media were not the same.
Perhaps you've been unlucky. I too have found some old 48 tpi media are
just not good enough, giving one or two errors, but most post 1980 are fine
-- and I suspect that's just the result of better quality control.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>I have a copy of the Sharp PC 7000 boot disk if you would like a >disk
>image of it. Let me know and I can email a copy of it to you.
>
>Ernest
I already have a boot disk for this thing, but thanks anyhow.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Mar 28, 1:26, Technoid(a)cheta.net wrote:
> In <38E04821.4B8943AE(a)mainecoon.com>, on 03/28/00
> at 01:26 AM, Chris Kennedy <chris(a)mainecoon.com> said:
> >Is this a Sun cdrom drive? Random SCSI cdrom drives are prone to not
> >working unless they have a sun-specific hack to make the ID string they
> >return something identifiable to the boot prom. Differing Suns have
> >differing ways of refering to CDROM drives, and some insist that the
> >CDROM drive show up as ID 6. Have you tried using the prom diagnostics
> >to probe the bus to see who is home?
>
> I figured the id6 thing out by inferring from other info I hit on the web
> which was pretty slim on specifics. The drive is 6 and is a Toshiba
> XM-3701b.
> Maybe I need a single-speed cdrom?
Some older Sun boot PROMs won't recogise a CDROM unless set for 512-byte
blocks. Although the 3601 and later Toshibas recognise the SCSI
mode-select command to switch from normal CDROM 2048-byte operation to
Sun/SGI 512-byte operation, older PROMs don't issue that command. I'm not
sure about a Sparcstation 330, but you may need a drive that can be
explicitly set (such as a Toshiba 3301 or 3401; some Sony and Hitachi
drives also have a switch or jumper.
You might also want to switch from the "old" boot mode (prompt ">") to the
"new" one (prompt "ok ") by typing "n". PROBE-SCSI, HELP, and most other
commands are only available from the "new" prompt.
> BTW there are issues with this machine
> I have not yet resolved such as a parity error on a simm and what I think
> might be a power problem.
I'd fix that first :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>> >M7195
>>
>> 128 kbyte RAM
>It's actually a MXV11-B Multifunction card, with 128KB RAM, and ...
>> It's also particularly confusing, because you evidently have no serial
>> line cards nor disk controllers in the backplane. I have no idea
>> how you even got the ODT prompt out of the machine.
>... the MXV11-B has two SLUs, of the same type as a DLV11.
Yeah, that makes more sense. I still don't know how his machine is
supposed to boot from disk without a disk controller, though!
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>By purchasing the i-opener you are agreeing to use the i-opener Internet
>service. The fee is $21.95 a month and will be billed to your credit card
>approximately 2 days after the i-opener is shipped to you.
And then $21.95 every month for the rest of your life? I seriously doubt
that such an open-ended contract is enforceable anywhere.
>i-opener Internet appliances shipped after March 20, 2000 can no longer be
>reconfigured in the manner described in recent reports. Modification of the
>i-opener in any way is in violation of our terms and conditions.
What terms and conditions? If you aren't allowed to see them (I poked
around a little bit and didn't find them) how can they be part of the
sales contract?
Wasn't it a Steve Martin movie that illustrated the "Substantial
Penalty for Early Withdrawal" clause? IIRC the depositor was given
a blindfold and shot...
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
On Mar 28, 3:00, r. 'bear' stricklin wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, r. 'bear' stricklin wrote:
>
> > GL2-3.6 (SGI's UNIX didn't come to be called until the first 4D-series
> > machines were released) and 3.5r1.
>
> -cough-
>
> What I MEANT to type was, of course, "didn't come to be called IRIX until
> the first 4D-series machines were released".
I knew that :-)
What I don't know, unfortunately, is the first thing about GL. Not that
sort, anyway. 'sifex' rings a bell, though. I'll ask amongst my friends.
Have you tried any of the c.s.sgi.* newsgroups?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Try http://www.zepa.net/apollo/Apollo-FAQ.html
----------
> From: Peter Pachla <peter.pachla(a)wintermute.org.uk>
> To: Classic Computer <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: HP Apollo/9000s
> Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 06:04 PM
>
> Hi Does anyone know of a FAQ or other document which describes the HP
Apollo
> (700 series?) and/or the HP-9000 series of PA-RISC machines (9000/7xx?).
All this talk of RM380/480s has prompted me to admit that I own four:
2 x Link 480Z (with one 'beige' twin 5.25 drive)
1 x 380Z (twin 8" drives and winchester)
1 x 380Z (twin 5.25" drives)
The 380Z with 8" drives is fairly well loaded:
1) IO
2) CPU/32K #1
3) 32K
4) Hi Res Graphics
5) Winchester #2
6) Analog I/O
7) Network #3
8) Terminator
#1 Containing (roll on drums, wait for it tony) a daughter card
containing the CPU and the IEEE gubbins (connected to the 'IEEE
STD 488 PORT')
#2 A 5Mbyte 5.25" unit - unfortunately expired before I acquired it
#3 This card has more wire wrap on the 'back' than any other card
I've seen that wasn't designed as such
The serial number is 35/121003 and the etch dates are 1978 or 1979
with some cards have a cloth sticker of 1980.
Doug.
> > If you can wait a day or two, a fellow classiccmper and I are
> >going to be inventorying the Altos machines....
> >....there may be some documentation (we've several binders full
> >of it) on your machine.
>Thanks, if you manage to find out ANYTHING do let me know.
Sorry, nothing about the machine that you had described, though we
did find some Altos 5-series and 8000-series binders.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
On Mar 27, 19:57, Tony Duell wrote:
> There is some wonderful confusion in this thread :-)....
Yes :-)
> The first is the standard density 48tpi drive. This is what PC owners
> would call a '360K drive'.
[...]
> The second is the standard density 96tpi drive.
[...]
> The third is the high density drive, known to PC users as the 1.2Mbyte
> drive.
[...]
> From this, it seems to me that a 1.2Mbyte drive will _not_ reliably
> read/write a 360K format on HD disks. It will use the wrong (too low)
> write current. HD disks should be used for 1.2Mbyte formats only.
>
> Of course when a 1.2Mbyte drive is set to use 'standard' disks, it in
> fact behaves like the second type above -- a 98tpi (80 cylinder) drive
> and not a 360K (40 cylinder) one.
Tony has put this very well. It's exactly what I was getting at.
Furthermore, the media used in 96 tpi standard density disks is, in my
experience, the same as that used in 48 tpi standard density disks. It
even says so in my CDC drive manuals. However, as we all (ought to) know,
the media for HD disks is very different.
> According to all the data I can find (which is not much), the centre
lines
> of the 48tpi tracks and the centre lines of alternate 96tpi tracks
> coincide. This means (amongst other things) that you can use the same
> alignment disk for both types of drive. It also means that a 96tpi drive
> can reliably read a disk formatted and written on a 48tpi drive (only).
> When the 96 tpi drive's head is on a suitable track it is reading along
> the middle of the track. It's going to read good data. That's why there's
> no problem reading disks that have been formatted/written in 360K drives
> using 1.2Mbyte drives.
>
> Now lets consider going the other way.
Tony and I are in very close agreement here as well. The only point I'd
add, is this:
Disks which have been written in 48 tpi drives, and not subsequently been
bulk erased, may be read in a 96 tpi drive; and if then overwritten by a 96
tpi drive, they will still be readable perfectly reliably by the 96 tpi
drive, but often not by the 48 tpi drive. Just as Tony (and others) have
said (and as I've been telling people for nearly 20 years). However, there
is a good reason that the process is sometimes observed to work to some
extent, and that has to do with the way the tracks are written/erased.
When the track is written, data is only written into the centre portion
(about 50% of the nominal track width). Either side of that, the erase
coils in the head write a narrow guard band, which occupies most of the
remaining track width. It may happen that the guard bands written by a 96
tpi drive are wide enough to erase a large proportion of the signal written
by a 48 tpi drive, and a 48 tpi drive might just manage to separate the new
signal from the relatively low level of the residual old signal.
I'm *not* advocating this as an excuse to write 40-track (or 35-track)
disks in an 80-track drive without prior bulk erasure. But it explains why
some people have found it works for them (even before manufacturers
streamlined the range of heads they made), though probably only with
limited permutations of drives, and limited (at best) reliability.
I'm well aware of the problems in switching between 48 tpi and 96 tpi. In
the early '80s, I made and sold a little addon for micros that might need
to read 40-track disks in 80-track drives. Because I was well aware of the
problem, I arranged it so that it could not only switch on double-step for
one drive, but could separately switch one of the drive selects between the
normal connector and an extra one. The device was normally used on BBC
Micros with twin 80-track floppies, and the extra connector was to connect
a third, genuine 48 tpi, drive.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>The cards are, from one end:
>M8192
OK, this is the CPU, a KDJ11-A.
>M7195
128 kbyte RAM
>M8067
Another 128 kbyte RAM
>M8045
Depending on the letters that follow M8045, it's between 8 kbytes
and 64 kbytes of RAM. I'm guessing it's a fully populated 64 kbytes.
>M8059
Another 128 kbytes or 256 kbytes of RAM, depending on the letters that
follow the M8059.
>I've also found out that it ran Venix in it's first life. It was connected
>to a PDP8/A that I also have but can't do anything with because of it's
>state.
>I'm unclear about the switches and lights, but I have the run light on, the
>DC light on, the fixed disk write protect switch out and it's red light out,
>and the fixed disk ready switch out with it's green light on.
>There seem to be some (slight) behavioural differences depending on which
>serial port I plug the terminal into.
It's also particularly confusing, because you evidently have no serial
line cards nor disk controllers in the backplane. I have no idea
how you even got the ODT prompt out of the machine.
Look at the serial ports on the back of the machine, and the ribbon
cables coming from the inside of the cab kits. Which cards in the
backplane do these connect to?
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 05:13:11 -0600 Gary Hildebrand <ghldbrd(a)ccp.com>
writes:
> yeah, I've seen stuff for the Amiga go for more than you could buy
> it new .
> . .
>
> Typical auction, or should we call it a feeding frenzy?
>
> Gary Hildebrand
> Amigaphile and purveyor of vacuum tube technology
Ain't that bizarre? Even more bizarre was when I picked up
an extremely scarce WD-1009 ESDI controller for < $10!
Contrary to popluar belief, there are bargains there. . .
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
The cards are, from one end:
M8192
M7195
M8067
M8045
M8059
There is an RX50 double floppy drive and an RD50 hard drive.
It's difficult to work out what these are cabled to as they all plug into an
interface behind the backplane.
I've also found out that it ran Venix in it's first life. It was connected
to a PDP8/A that I also have but can't do anything with because of it's
state.
I'm unclear about the switches and lights, but I have the run light on, the
DC light on, the fixed disk write protect switch out and it's red light out,
and the fixed disk ready switch out with it's green light on.
There seem to be some (slight) behavioural differences depending on which
serial port I plug the terminal into.
Hans
-----Original Message-----
From: CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com <CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2000 0:49
Subject: RE: PDP11/23 More dumb questions
>>Anyway, I start the VT220 before the PDP and it gives a message VT220
Ready.
>>I power up the PDP and basically get nothing at all. The only sequence
that
>>gets any response is hitting the halt button. The terminal then says:
>>165262
>>@
>>When I hit the Restart button after that nothing happens for about 2
>>minutes.
>>Then an "&" prompt appears.
>>Nothing I type in gets any response after that. Typing "help" gets no
>>response.
>
>The "165262 @" prompting is from ODT. ODT is a very simplistic monitor
>that lets you modify memory and registers and start or single-step
>through instructions in memory.
>
>165000 is a common (but not the most common) address to put a ROM'ed
>bootstrap at. I'm guessing that when you halted it it was either doing
>the self-test or waiting for an external device to come ready.
>
>The "&" prompt I'm not so sure about. It's possible that this is a prompt
>from the bootstrap monitor (some Emulex bootstraps will say that) or
>maybe it's from the OS/embedded application.
>
>>The machine is in a BA23 case and was a PDP11/23 I think, but has a
PDP11/73
>>CPU upgrade. There is a full height ST506 hard drive reputed to be 30Mb in
>>size, which spins and makes all the right noises.
>>Any suggestions?
>
>What would help the most of all is an inventory of cards in the backplane.
>If they're DEC cards they'll have a "Mxxxx" number on the handle. Third
>party cards you'll probably have to pull to identify. Also tell us
>the exact position of each card in the backplane, and what cards are cabled
>to what drives.
>
>I suspect from the less-than-perfectly-standard bootstrap address of
>165000 that you've got a third-party controller in there with on-board
>bootstrap, though of course there an infinite number of permutations that
>things could have been set up for!
>
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>
Howdy;
I've got an IRIS 3130 I recently rescued, along with a shocking pile of
tapes. Among these are what appears to be complete OS install tapes for
GL2-3.6 (SGI's UNIX didn't come to be called until the first 4D-series
machines were released) and 3.5r1.
For various reasons I am interested in performing a new system
installation. Booting from tape is (obviously) in order, and a tape
identifying itself as the "boot system" is present.
If I 'boot sq0' the QIC spins briefly and complains that it can't find the
default boot file. Supposedly there is a stand-alone utility called
'sifex' which can be booted from tape to initialize disks and the like,
but if that's on this tape it's not letting on. 'boot sq0:sifex' returns
with an error to the effect that 'sifex' can't be found on the tape.
I'm missing something but I don't know what. Am I trying to boot the wrong
tape, or is something else going on? I suppose it would be worth trying
to read a few of the QIC tapes while the system is up, but if someone
knows in the meanwhile what my problem is likely to be, it'd be helpful.
ok
r.
In a message dated 3/27/2000 12:35:30 PM Pacific Standard Time,
at258(a)osfn.org writes:
> I checked out our Altos, and the old one is a 580-10A, #43948. Apparently
> they made a lot of these little devils.
>
I believe the 580 is a Z-80 machine, not an intel 8080 processor. Another PN
used for the Z-80 is the MK3880P-xx where xx=speed & P=plastic case.
The '-10' indicates a 10 Meg HD. They could come with several different
brands of drives. CPM or MPM was usually the operating system. there is a
separate supervisor terminal port to administer the system. I think there
were three user ports and two serial ports, one for a modem and one for a
printer.
I had about 10 of these at one time. Sold the last during my warehouse sales.
I have had several up and running. They are easy. Plug a terminal into
console. Wyse 100 or 50 terminal emulation. usually 9600/8/N (Hmm I can't
remember the stop bits) Put a current limiter on the power line when you
power it up for the first time. Make sure it is warm (room temp) and not cold
>from storage.
Paxton
>Did you start with a bulk-erased (i.e. with a degausser) disk? And >is it a
>real 360K disk (and not a 1.2Mbyte one)?
>
>-tony
Yes, it was a real 360K disk, I just reformatted it in Windows (it will let
you choose between 1.2Mb or 360 formats).
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, 1541, FSD-1, GeoRAM 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
"Spectrum": Tandy Color Computer 3.
"Boombox": Sharp PC-7000.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I had a 2086 and THAT was a cool machine
(also a way to find an RD-54--because
it was the same drive!).
>
> I checked out our Altos, and the old one is a 580-10A,
> #43948. Apparently
> they made a lot of these little devils.
>
> M. K. Peirce
> Rhode Island Computer Museum, Inc.
> 215 Shady Lea Road,
> North Kingstown, RI 02852
>
> "Casta est qui nemo rogavit."
>
> - Ovid
>
<> So, would any of our UK members like a VAX 11/750? Possibly one tha
<>has a SCSI adapter?
<>
<
<I gather that these are quite big, how does it compare for size with my
<MicroVAX II with 5 RA81 drives (ie 2 19" rack units)?
the basic 750 box is a 40" (memory test) wide by 40" high rack. So it's
smaller than your dual rack microvax. It can be powered off 110V at
reasonable current so in the 230v world it's not a huge problem there.
<I would like to ask for it but if it is a roomful then SWMBO might throw
<me _and_ the VAX out of the house ;-)
Depends on the disks alongside.
Performance wise the 750 is still slower than MVII, though IO perfomance
can be much better due to unibus vs qbus. Though reasonable cooling and
basic maintenance they tend to run a long time with little effort.
Allison
>I have a complete doc set for the VAX GKS software (whatever
>the heck it is)
Graphics Kernel System, maybe? Sounds dimly familiar from the Core
graphics library for the Pro, unless I'm confusing it with something else.
John Wilson
D Bit
OK, I got a 6.4 GB laptop drive hooked up and right now the iOpener is running
DOS/BATCH V10-01A on an emulated PDP-11/40+RK05 system. I love it!!!
It's going to take some real butchery to get the case closed, but I guess
that's to be expected. The low-profile 3M connector barely fit under the
CPU heat sink w/o needing it to be clearanced, that was nice.
BTW the CPU seems to be 200 MHz, not 180 MHz. But it still gets only about
80 BogoMIPS, pretty slow.
John Wilson
D Bit
<>BTW the CPU seems to be 200 MHz, not 180 MHz. But it still gets only
<>about 80 BogoMIPS, pretty slow.
The winchip is about slow as pents come. Pentium with MMX at 180 is
much better.
<I heard last night that Netpliance is making modifications so that people
<can no longer do this... they are apparently losing a LOT of money selling
<the machines, having expected to recoup it in the service charges...
No one has seen one and there is commentary both ways from Netplience.
<Can someone confirm this... and maybe confirm the change that they
<have done (which I understand is simply removal of the cable connector
<for the drive).
Removing(not putting it in really) the connector is about all they could
do with a production stream like that otherwise the cost to manufacture
and all goes out the window. To me that does not constitute hacker
proofing as putting one in is trivial and I might get to put in in the
right side of the board even.
In any case it would take a major effort to change something in production
more than trivially, I've had to push that at DEC and elsewhere, it was
hell. The other half os the current hacker words for it is that it's a
great box even as is and they'd give their mother one. Loosing that good
will to a few thousand hacked units at most would be costly in the long
term. They have gotten a lot of VERY positive free press and it could
become negative fast if they tried something too nasty.
<Oh, and supposedly back-ordered units will have the mod...
We shall see, I'm waiting.
Allison
>On many of the operating systems, you don't have to do a SYSGEN - just
>tweak a number in the configuration word and viola, it's now a 50Hz
>machine.
>
>For an RT-11 machine, in particular, you can tweak this on a running
>system if you wish:
[... 50hz.mac deleted ...]
Tim - I'm surprised at you... simply setting this bit is *not* sufficient.
The bit is set based on assembly parameters. Those parameters also
set the values for ticks/day based on 50 and 60 hz. Those values are
patched at boot time to reflect what the system thinks the clock is
supposed to be (what it was genned for).
Without the other counters set correctly, date rollover won't work
at all correctly... since it will be waiting for sufficient clock
ticks at the 60hz rate to have gone by before it bumps the clock.
I seem to recall that there is another gotcha to this, but haven't
yet found it in the sources...
Bottom line is that the config bits are supposed to be read, not
written, as they indicate what the system was built for or what it
has determined (via probe) to be running on...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Thanks all for the advice on the BA23 110/230v power switching.
I've done that now and powered it up. I have a VT220 terminal that is
functional as far as I know and connected to a random serial connector on
the PDP, one of 6.
Unfortunately I know nothing at all about PDP's or VT's.
Anyway, I start the VT220 before the PDP and it gives a message VT220 Ready.
I power up the PDP and basically get nothing at all. The only sequence that
gets any response is hitting the halt button. The terminal then says:
165262
@
When I hit the Restart button after that nothing happens for about 2
minutes.
Then an "&" prompt appears.
Nothing I type in gets any response after that. Typing "help" gets no
response.
The machine is in a BA23 case and was a PDP11/23 I think, but has a PDP11/73
CPU upgrade. There is a full height ST506 hard drive reputed to be 30Mb in
size, which spins and makes all the right noises.
It was last operational about 5 years ago and was part of a Cybermation
laser cutting system. I have no idea what OS would have been installed. I
have no docs or media.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Hans
>Anyway, I start the VT220 before the PDP and it gives a message VT220 Ready.
>I power up the PDP and basically get nothing at all. The only sequence that
>gets any response is hitting the halt button. The terminal then says:
>165262
>@
>When I hit the Restart button after that nothing happens for about 2
>minutes.
>Then an "&" prompt appears.
>Nothing I type in gets any response after that. Typing "help" gets no
>response.
The "165262 @" prompting is from ODT. ODT is a very simplistic monitor
that lets you modify memory and registers and start or single-step
through instructions in memory.
165000 is a common (but not the most common) address to put a ROM'ed
bootstrap at. I'm guessing that when you halted it it was either doing
the self-test or waiting for an external device to come ready.
The "&" prompt I'm not so sure about. It's possible that this is a prompt
>from the bootstrap monitor (some Emulex bootstraps will say that) or
maybe it's from the OS/embedded application.
>The machine is in a BA23 case and was a PDP11/23 I think, but has a PDP11/73
>CPU upgrade. There is a full height ST506 hard drive reputed to be 30Mb in
>size, which spins and makes all the right noises.
>Any suggestions?
What would help the most of all is an inventory of cards in the backplane.
If they're DEC cards they'll have a "Mxxxx" number on the handle. Third
party cards you'll probably have to pull to identify. Also tell us
the exact position of each card in the backplane, and what cards are cabled
to what drives.
I suspect from the less-than-perfectly-standard bootstrap address of
165000 that you've got a third-party controller in there with on-board
bootstrap, though of course there an infinite number of permutations that
things could have been set up for!
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I just today acquired a Sharp PC-7000 "lunchbox" style luggable, I thought
it was a boombox until I opened it up. I know that it is an MS-DOS (XT or AT
class?) machine, but now I need software for it. Can someone direct me to a
good software archive for this machine? Also, what is the purpose of the
metal-covered (screwed shut) connector on the underside of the machine? Is
it for an external hard drive?
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, 1541, FSD-1, GeoRAM 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
"Spectrum": Tandy Color Computer 3.
"Boombox": Sharp PC-7000.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>Does anyone have any pointers to sites on the web which cover Altos
>machines? I've done a search on Yahoo and a couple of other places and
>turned up nothing.
Yes, there is a surprising lack of information "on the web" on Altos
machines.
>I'm particularly interested in information on the Unix systems they were
>making around 1990 - we had one at work, an i386 in a tower case. Not PC
>compatible IIRC, possibly called an "Altos III" or something similar.
If you can wait a day or two, a fellow classiccmper and I are going to be
inventorying the Altos machines that we've (temporarily) taken custody
of, as well as the documents. All the machines that we have are
19" wide by about 7.5" high tabletop units, often with 8" floppies in the
front so they're almost certainly older than your machine, but there may
be some documentation (we've several binders full of it) on your machine.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
CC'd to port-vax (NetBSD) and Classiccmp...
Last call! I have a complete doc set for the VAX GKS software (whatever
the heck it is) that's going in RECYCLE if someone doesn't speak up by
Tuesday. These are still in their shrink wrap, and they can be yours for
$1.00 plus the shipping cost (small box, not very nasty at all).
Let me know. Thanks!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
>This pair of boxes is nominally the same size, somewhat narrower than
>"rack-width" and about 7" tall. They're plastic boxes with a beige (could
>be influenced by many years' cigarrette smoke) exterior and black (probably
>... I haven't looked closely at them for some time.) front.
>
>They're quite weighty. By that I mean absolutely too heavy to ship across
>the planet.
Huh? The boxes you're talking about must be different than the 6 Altos
boxes I have that meet the same dimensions... they only weigh 55 or 60
pounds each.
(OB disclaimer: my standard for "heavy enough that I don't want to lift
it too often" is a DG 6045 drive or a DEC RA80 drive, about 140-150 pounds.
I used to be a puny weakling until I started collecting old computers and
drives...)
Tim.
I'm CC'ing this to both classiccmp and port-vax.
Found on Usenet. Keith Huff, in Allentown, PA has a bunch of DEC'ish
freebies up for grabs. Get 'em while you can!
Attachment follows.
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
On Sun, 26 Mar 00 18:31:13 GMT, in comp.sys.dec you wrote:
>> I still have some stuff I need to get rid of, otherwise it goes to the
>>dumpster. Everything listed is best offer and shipping. Items located in
>>Allentown, Pa 18103.
>>
>>
>> (2) VR262 19" mono monitors
>>
>> (1) VR260 19" mono monitor
>>
>> (2) DECstation 3100 motherboards
>>
>> (18) DEC 2Mb 80-pin SIMMs
>>
>> (1) VFB01 mono framebuffer
>>
>> (10) used TK50 tapes
>>
>> (6) brand new TK50 tapes
>>
>> (1) bare TK50 drive
>>
>> (1) LK201 keyboard
>>
>> (1) VT320 terminal
>>
>> (1) VT1200 mono X-term base
>>
>> (1) Wyse WY-85 terminal & keyboard
>>
>> (8) CDROM caddies
>>
>> (1) DZ11 users guide
>>
>> (1) DZ11 maintenance manual
>>
>> (1) RL01/RL02 disk subsystem users manual
>>
>> (23) 6250 BPI 9-track tapes
>>
>>Keith Huff
>>
>>kshuff(a)fast.net
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho,
Blue Feather Technologies -- kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech [dot] com
Web: http://www.bluefeathertech.com
"...No matter how we may wish otherwise, our science can only describe an object,
event, or living thing in our own human terms. It cannot possibly define any of them..."
<Yes, it was a real 360K disk, I just reformatted it in Windows (it will let
<you choose between 1.2Mb or 360 formats).
<____________________________________________________________
<David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
A 1.2mb drive does not produce reliable 360k media. It will read it but
it's not symetric. Some 360k drives have more than normal difficulty
reading disks created by a 96tpi drive.
Allison
Here are some more items up for grabs. John
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin and Julie Grove <grover(a)scecnet.net>
To: <jrkeys(a)concentric.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2000 4:35 PM
Subject: Mac Computer
> Hi,
> I saw the article in the Pioneer Press. I have a Macintosh SE/30 (~1989)
> and an Apple ImageWriter II. Both are in excellent condition. Do you
have
> either of these in your collection yet? Let me know if you are interested
> in either one or if you need more info about them.
>
> We also have a "Apple Multiple Scan 15 Display" monitor (~1995). The
screen
> has a blue cast to it. According to the Apple website, there is a way to
> fix this problem, but I no longer have a use for the monitor. Let me know
> if you are interested in this as well.
>
> We live in Western WI, but come to WBL on occasion, so we could drop it
off.
>
> J.G.
>
Going by the goodwill today, they've got a LARGE quantity of external
floppy drives (probably 15-20 at least) for the 2260 and 2270 models
for $2.95 each. If anybody needs one for their GRiD, let me know, and
I'll pick one up for you (already got one for each of my 2270s).
They look BRAND NEW - no scratches/wear, and the connectors that plug
into the laptop have a little blue plastic bag still over them....
Now, if I could just find a power supply and/or a pen.
Bill
--
+---------------+-------------------+
| Bill Bradford | mrbill(a)mrbill.net |
+-------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-------+-----------------------------------------+
| Version: 3.12 GCS d- s:++ a- C++++ US++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ N++ o K+++ w--- |
| O- M-- V- PS PE+ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X- R-- tv+++ b++++ DI++++ D++ G++ e++ h r++ y+ |
+--------END GEEK CODE BLOCK--------------------------------------------------+
Anybody know where I can get info on these? I picked up 3 of them today,
complete with batteries, but no power supplies or pens (they can be used as
a "flat pad" mode, with a pen, or the screen flips up to reveal the keyboard).
Any info would be appreciated.
Bill
--
+---------------+-------------------+
| Bill Bradford | mrbill(a)mrbill.net |
+-------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-------+-----------------------------------------+
| Version: 3.12 GCS d- s:++ a- C++++ US++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ N++ o K+++ w--- |
| O- M-- V- PS PE+ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X- R-- tv+++ b++++ DI++++ D++ G++ e++ h r++ y+ |
+--------END GEEK CODE BLOCK--------------------------------------------------+
<>Are you using a 1.2MB floppy drive to write a 360K floppy disk?
<
<Yes, but I used the drive (1.2Mb) to format it to 360K.
<____________________________________________________________
<David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
There lies your error. 360k floppies are 48tpi, 1.2mb floppies are 96tpi.
The intertrack spacing is different, head width is different.
Find a real 360k drive, try again.
These young apprentices... ;)
Allison