Well, I've decided to bite the bullet and try to install
OpenVMS 7.2 from the media kit I bought a few months ago
>from Montagar. I have this Vaxstation 4000/60; I exchanged
the RZ-24E it originally had by an ST31200N. I transferred
a TZ30 drive from a storage expansion box that was used in
a decstation 2100 to the right bay, and I got hold of a
512 bytes/sector DEC CDROM. The prospect of the installation
is somewhat scary forme since I know nothing about VMS, but
with the help of the OpenVMS installation guide I am
to the point where I restored the system save set to the
ST31200 (dka0) and booted off it. So far, the only choice
I have made is to select Decnet plus over Decnet phase IV,
as the installation instructions seemed to hint that it can work
over tcp/ip . When it is done extracting those packages, I
understand that it is going to ask me about passwords and
about SCSNODE and SCSSYSTEMID. Can someone explain
SCSSYSTEMID to me? I know nothing about OpenVMS or DECNET, but
I am hoping to eventually set up things to boot the uVax II
that I also have off the 4000/60; in addition, I'd like
to connect everything to the university's 10T and run
internet clients on the 4000/60 .
accepting to being clueless,
Carlos.
--
Carlos Murillo-Sanchez email: cem14(a)cornell.edu
428 Phillips Hall, Electrical Engineering Department
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
On April 10, Aaron Christopher Finney wrote:
> Basically, it's a 15mhz 68020 with 4megs ram (stock). It's got a mono
> frame buffer, scsi, ethernet built in. No power/space for internal storage
> devices. I've got one w/12megs ram and it makes a pretty good mono X
> terminal.
4mb is the max unless you have one of those nifty 3rd party memory
expansion daughterboards. I've got one or two of them somewhere if
anyone is really dying for one.
They're pretty swappy at 4mb.
> I think the last OS supported is SunOS 4.1.
4.1.1_U1
-Dave McGuire
Got one of these as a freebie when I picked up a
bunch of hardware I won (bought) at a university
auction.
Not being familiar with Sun products, can anyone
tell me which flavor(s) of unix I might be able
to load. Its currently a diskless pizza box, extra
large. What kind of performance can I expect from
this old thing... slow ?.... superslow.. ?
Any links to related Sun sites ........ etc..
Thanks Nick
This is off-topic, so please reply directly. Thanks.
My son was just given a Mac LC II without a monitor, but
including a keyboard and mouse. I am not a Mac user or
owner (until now), so I have no idea whatsoever to be looking
for in a replacement monitor. Is the LC II a B&W or Color
computer (I don't have the foggiest :-)? Help.
The computer has a 160MB hard drive, a floppy drive, and what
appears to be one memory SIMM (with four big chips on it, so
I'm guessing 4MB at most).
Cheers. Kevin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Kevin L. Anderson Ph.D., Geography Department, Augustana College
Rock Island, Illinois 61201-2296, USA phone: (309) 794-7325
e-mail: kla(a)helios.augustana.edu -or- gganderson(a)augustana.edu
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Opinions expressed here are my own and do not represent
the administration of Augustana College.
>Also, I have these qbus boards from Sky Computer
>that I have no clue what they are; they're all quad height (assuming that
>means they have four connectors). They are Skywar-Q-A-03, Skywar-Q-B-03, and
>Skydpmem-Q-02.
Are there
Today I got a call from a man in Virginia and a e-mail from another who saw a reprint of the article done by the local Pioneer Press here in the twin cities. Has anyone on the list see the article on collecting classic ? If so can you e-mail me the names of the papers. Thanks John
->I've removed all boards save the memory boards (2*M7609)
>and the CPU (M7606-AA)
>
>Now I get characters (XON/OFF = on) and the bootprocess continues
>until char 3
Xon/Xoff is DECs standard flow control, VTxxxS know how to do that.
>I've tried to put some of the boards back but I am not sure if I have a
>missing
>board.
>
>Het boards were arranged as follows
>
slot 1 AB/CD >slot 1 ----------------M 7606------------------
slot 2 AB/CD >slot 2 ----------------M 7609------------------
slot 3 AB/CD >slot 3 ----------------M 7609------------------
slot 4/5 AB/AB >slot 4 -----M7516-------- (empty)
slot 7/6 AB/AB >slot 5 -----M7555-------- ------M7546------
slot 8/9 AB/AB >slot 6 (empty) ---Dilog sq703a---
This was the smaller BA23? if so then the slot next to the m7516 is the
bus grant break
and the slot 6 empty is a bus grant break. Notice my margin comments. the
odd ordering of
slots 4-9 indicate direction of bus grant for Interrupts and DMA.
>The uVAX used to contain a Serial concentrator or something
That was likely a DHV11 or DZV11, worth having.
>I've gathered that the first 4 slots are different from the rest of
>the BA123, those beeing true Qbus 22 slots.
Not quite. It's the AB/CD vs AB/AB serpentine bus grant. The BA123
has more of the AB/CD slots than BA23. FYI: AB are address/data
Q22 and CD or special bussed for memory or cards that only need
power.
> Should I rearrange the boards ? If so what do you suggest?
Yes.
slot 1 AB/CD >slot 1 ----------------M 7606------------------
slot 2 AB/CD >slot 2 ----------------M 7609------------------
slot 3 AB/CD >slot 3 ----------------M 7609------------------
slot 4/5 AB/AB >slot 4 -----M7516-------- ------m7546------
slot 7/6 AB/AB >slot 5 -----M7555-------- ------sq703A------
slot 8/9 AB/AB >slot 6 (empty) (empty)
Allison
>On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 03:24:06PM -0400, allisonp wrote:
>> >All H-89's were sold in kit form. The H-88 is another story. These
were
>> >early all in one computers and did have 8080 CPU's in the beginning.
Most
>> >H-88 units were upgrades to the H-19 terminals.
>>
>> Wrong! the H88 was the diskless version of the h89 and was z80. The h8x
>> were all z80. The basic design was H19 terminal with an additional Z80
>> based card (with peripherals on ad in cards).
>
>Which part is wrong, that it's an upgrade from the H19, or that it's
>substantially different from the H89? I'm pretty sure I remember Heath
>selling an H19-to-H89 upgrade kit, but I dunno where the H88 fits in.
That there was an 8080 in some versions. The H8 was the 8080 machine.
There was an h19 to h88/89/90 upgrade and that was the cpu, PS and IO.
The base H8x was a h19 with those added items. In many ways it was not
unlike a Vt180 approach.
Aquired two H89s and gave them away. Kept the H19 I built in 1978.
Allison
>All H-89's were sold in kit form. The H-88 is another story. These were
>early all in one computers and did have 8080 CPU's in the beginning. Most
>H-88 units were upgrades to the H-19 terminals.
Wrong! the H88 was the diskless version of the h89 and was z80. The h8x
were all z80. The basic design was H19 terminal with an additional Z80
based card (with peripherals on ad in cards).
All of the H/Z series are related and part of the changes reflects Heath to
Zenith transistion. The 88/89/90 were the same base machine with different
features namely different memory configs and disk subsystems.
Allison
In a message dated 4/9/00 13:16:27 Central Daylight Time,
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes:
> An H/Z88 is a cassette-based system. It's a Z19 terminal with a Z80 CPU
> board and a cassette interface. I don't know if the 3-port serial board
> came in this machine or not. Although it's based on the Z19 terminal,
> many machines were sold as H88 computers, etc, and were not
> field-upgraded Z19s (although that was possible).
The H-19 to H-88 kits changed later to H-19 to H-89 kits. I built both.
After the Floppy controller (Hard Sector) was released, the upgrade kits
could be ordered with the Floppy interface. Both my H-19 to H-88 kits came
with the serial card. Not sure when the H-88 disappeared from the line up
though.
The last H-89 I built was an "A". The CPU and TLB's came with RFI shields on
them. I still have that one. Runs a 4 MHz Z-80, Magnolia CP/M 2.2 and 3.0,
Magnolia 128K RAM drive, Magnolia 5"/8" floppy Controller and the Magnolia
Serial/SASI board. It still is a nice machine. Power supply upgrades were
also included.
Mike Stover, KB9VU
CCA# 404
CRA# 77
MARS AFA3BO
Florissant, MO
In a message dated 4/9/00 13:16:27 Central Daylight Time,
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes:
> As I understand it, an H?? is a Heathkit, and came in kit form. Actually,
> the CPU and terminal logic boards were factory assembled/tested, and you
> only got to assembly the PSU, video board and case :-(. The Z?? is a
> Zenith, and came assembled.
You also got to assemble the Serial card and the HS Floppy controller.
Mike Stover, KB9VU
CCA# 404
CRA# 77
MARS AFA3BO
Florissant, MO
On Apr 9, 14:32, Technoid(a)cheta.net wrote:
> Now my last and only problem is that BOTH of my sun keyboards (type 4)
> work well but BOTH of my optical mice have one led that DON'T LIGHT.
> Working on this one. Also I don't have a mousepad but I think I can
> construct one while I wait to find one.
Are you sure about that? One of the LEDs is an infrared LED, with no
output in the visible range.
> I have had difficulties locating pinouts and other tech info on the
mouse.
> Any suggestions?
ftp://ftp.ececs.uc.edu/pub/sun-faq/Docs/FixingASunMouse
Also worth a look is the section on converting a Sun optical mouse to an
SGI mouse, in
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/2258/4dfaq.html
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
In a message dated 4/9/00 16:55:02 Central Daylight Time,
allisonp(a)world.std.com writes:
> >All H-89's were sold in kit form. The H-88 is another story. These were
> >early all in one computers and did have 8080 CPU's in the beginning. Most
> >H-88 units were upgrades to the H-19 terminals.
>
>
> Wrong! the H88 was the diskless version of the h89 and was z80. The h8x
> were all z80. The basic design was H19 terminal with an additional Z80
> based card (with peripherals on ad in cards).
>
>
> All of the H/Z series are related and part of the changes reflects Heath to
> Zenith transistion. The 88/89/90 were the same base machine with different
> features namely different memory configs and disk subsystems.
>
> Allison
>
>
Yep, I misspoke. Thinking H-8 and talking H-88. Thanks for the correction.
Mike Stover, KB9VU
>DEC ended up dumping some of their early micros on their own employees.
>The used market was flooded with VT180s and PDT-11/150s for a while there,
>as a result. But presumably the employees got special pricing, so it's
>probably not fair to count them as real live sales to private individuals,
>since they had special incentives.
They were initally available with incentives, later they were cheap at end
of product and then when internal use was phased out then were retired
and often given away. Got my my systems by the later means while there.
Allison
Richard Erlacher said,
>The conventional wisdom where NASA is concerned, is that they HAD high
>standards through the Apollo program and that shortly thereafter, a lot of
>people left and apparently took vital talents with them. I've not worked
>directly with NASA people in a very long time, and can't agree or disagree
>with that view.
I'm working at NASA right this very minute. I think it's pretty much
impossible to categorize "NASA" as a single monolithic coding entity. Here
at GSFC, there's one group running the ground system that is very
conscientious and writes good code, with input checks, comments, version
control, descriptive variable names, etc., and properly tests the code
before running it for real. Then there's another group where their
acceptance test run of the code (which I observed) gave a list of internal
tests, all saying "passed". But when I asked exactly what each test did, it
turned out that *half* of them did nothing other than print up the word
"passed". This was flight code, btw, and they had not told us of any plans
to upgrade it. It's better now, and fortunately is not critical to the
mission in any case. But the bottom line is that even within a single NASA
field center, there's a *lot* of variation.
- Mark
>Yes, KO thought the DEC product line should be marketed to professionals.
>However, at the time, the people to whom a computer product had to be
>marketed was the hobbyists. It had been amply demonstrated that, no matter
>how marginally it fit, the personal computer as marketed to hobbyists would
>"do" in place of the supermini, with the trend toward distributed
processing
PCs were useful in that they were local and flexible. reliability was hard
to
come by with them.
>spreading wildly, while no one could replace the 1000 or so PC's that cost
>what a supermini cost with a supermini. Professionals were, themselves,
True, by '87 the price/perfomance crossover for the individual user
was comming around.
>facility where my neighbor works. Their Pro-380 didn't do so well next to
>PC's costing less than half what they did. The high cost of DEC software
>licenses didn't help either.
By time the Pro380 hit, it was too late. Still it had things that PCs were
trying to do often not well. The license issue was costly but we are paying
for the alternative still.
>About 15 years ago, I was put in the position of demonstrating that a
>cluster of '386 PC's would outperform a custer of microVAXen in a given
>environment. What brought down the house was by how much they outdid them.
I did the same thing using z80s. What the vax did better was network, do
general applications and groupware. It was (even as a cluster) and still is
far easier to manage than 40 W95 PCs and 3 NTservers! I never achieved
the generalized performance of a vax even with multiple z80s.
>I was not nearly as sure of myself about that comparison as I had been in
>the previous SCSI/ESDI comparison. In fact, because of the substantially
>more efficient use of mass storage in the DEC MSCP, I expected that the
PC's
>would be I/O bound to their single hard drive, while the uVAX with a drive
>pair could operate much faster. There's quite a difference between what
>they can do and what they will do, I guess.
I found I could bring a PC to it's knees IO wise faster than a loaded vax
and
when the PC folded it wasn't graceful... still isn't under MS anything.
On the otherhand I've tuned vaxen and there are tricks that PCs still
haven't
learned. Try running multiple MSPC and mutiple SCSI controllers say two
of each with one spindle per... then Qbus is the limiting element. PCs
of the era of Qbus were ISA16 and they could never stand two EDSI and
two SCSI controlled in the same box, assuming you could get Win3.1
to even install them. Of course the 8-10 mhz bus was the bottleneck and
the controllers were not smart at all if they even had DMA.
Reminds me of the guy at citicorp in 1990 telling me his 386dx/33 could
crush the VAX750 (no racehorse). I wasn't impressed. He stopped making
the claim of superiority when I asked when the last reboot was due to a
crash.
Seems the vax was an unattended server with 1yr 3months uptime and was
also used to serve out his local PC database.
Comparisons are like many thing statisical... mostly point reference.
Allison
My $02 on PCs is Linux/FreeBSD/netbsd was the best thing to happen to
PC hardware as it was the first OS with some semblence of performance
and concept of operational stability.
If there is anything worng with PC vs VAX comparison is often the vax
compared
is nowhere near bleeding edge and the PC is. Then again the VAXs in
question
had more uptime than the PCs time in production. Also the VAX (running
any
OS of choice) had better IO buffering than most very highend PCs until the
early 90s.
On April 9, Technoid(a)cheta.net wrote:
> My sun mice only have one led lit per mouse. There should be two lit as
> there is obviously a second led that is not. Any suggestions on repair or
> replacement of the mouse. The box is perfect! --
It's normal to see only one LED lit...the other is infrared...
-Dave McGuire
In a message dated 2/6/00 15:25:49 Central Standard Time, west(a)tseinc.com
writes:
> > Mike
> Thanks for the tip!
>
> Hey, I haven't got a chance to go through the stuff yet. Tell me, are these
> H89/90's or Z89/90's?? Isn't the different an 8080cpu vs. Z80?
>
Just found this note Jay. All H-89's and Z-89's have the Z80 processor
installed. The H-8 computers came with the 8080 installed. The Early H-89's
had an ORG 0 problem with CP/M but none of yours have that problem ... they
have all be modified.
The Z-90 series came with the soft sector card installed from the factory.
All H-89's were sold in kit form. The H-88 is another story. These were
early all in one computers and did have 8080 CPU's in the beginning. Most
H-88 units were upgrades to the H-19 terminals.
How are you coming with your treasure trove of old H/Z stuff? I did find
some more software and a few other spare parts. They are here whenever you
holler.
Mike Stover, KB9VU
CCA# 404
CRA# 77
MARS AFA3BO
Florissant, MO
On April 9, Charles P. Hobbs (SoCalTip) wrote:
> Sort of speaking of which: did anyone ever buy any DEC equipment for home
> use (Not VAXen and stuff, I'm more thinking about their PC's such as the
> Rainbow?)
When I was in my teens (1985 or so) I worked in a retail computer
store in a mall. We carried original IBM PCs, Apple clones made by
Franklin, Kaypros, and...DEC Rainbows & Pros.
I only saw a few of them sell...but they did sell.
-Dave McGuire
>Sort of speaking of which: did anyone ever buy any DEC equipment for home
>use (Not VAXen and stuff, I'm more thinking about their PC's such as the
>Rainbow?)
Yes.
PDT150, low cost (then) PDP-11 running RT-11.
Robin, VT180 CPM system.
DECMATE series (wordprocessing with extensions)
Rainbow
PRO3xx
All pre-PC boom or leading into that time. Keep in mind that
the idea of home computer was a 1984-5ish or later event.
Before that marketing was more aimed at hobbiests(anything),
lowcost home systems(mostly gaming) and business systems
(packaged or extensible systems).
As a reference in 1985 a good business system was a
$5-7000 (USD) investment. It didn't make much difference
if it was PC, S100, Multibus or whatever. Around then things
we take for granted were not cheap. In 85 10-40mb of disk
with controller was ~$700, decent printer $400+ and so on.
For example in 1981 my NS* Horizon (z80 64k) with 5mb
hard disk, H19 terminal, Anadex printer was valued around
$3700! A PC with all the trimings to do the same task was
not cheaper.
Allison
>Your defense is unnecessary, since it's only by coincidence that I happened
No defense, more a commentary on how much fun language can be.
>This particular expression is use so much without a thought as to its
actual
>meaning. I'm not entirely certain how the term slough became associated
>with an indeterminate but large number, but that seems to be what is meant.
>I guess it started with someone referring to ducks or frogs or mosquitoes.
There is that. My experience is the term "slew rate" commonly associated
with op-amps.
Now the common use, slew meaning a whole lot of them is more in the
realm of slang and something I am accustomed to.
So the juxtapostion of delta, large quantiry and also quagmire in that
statement was subtle good humor. Then again I enjoy Samual Clements
and his style of writing as well.
Allison
On Apr 8, 10:13, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner <spc(a)armigeron.com>
> > The project he's on is a complete disaster as the manager went for a
> > Microsoft solution using slews of programs
> BTW, your apparent juxtaposition of one word for its homomymn, and it
> happens all too often with this particular one. There's this term,
> pronounced "sloo" which is often misspelled "slew" but which should be
> "slough" also pronounced "sloo" meaning a swamp or quagmire.
Eh? Perhaps American pronunciation differs, but over here "slough"
(meaning swamp) is pronounced to rhyme with "plough" ('plow') :-) Anyway,
"slew" means "large number or quantity" [Oxford English Dictionary], which
I'm sure is what Sean means... On the other hand, "slough" pronounced
"sluff" means dead tissue that drops off from living flesh. Given the
context...
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
--- Aaron Christopher Finney <af-list(a)wfi-inc.com> wrote:
> That's exactly what my friend did - ground away *carefully* with a dremel
> until it was exposed.
>
> Jeff (Technoid) on this list mentioned in the Sun NVRAM thread that he'd
> done this successfully...maybe he's got some practical advice for you.
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Tony Duell wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Heard of few getting into theirs to hook into a new battery when
> > > the old battery expired.
I have done this on a 48T02 for my SPARC2. I did it at one end of the
chip and I cut *through* the leads going up to the battery to disconnect
it from the SRAM entirely. After I exposed the leads, I soldered on a
9V battery cable which I snapped onto a 9V battery top (removed from a
dead battery), into which I soldered a 3V lithium battery that had solder
leads already bonded to it (scavenged from a dead board of some kind).
I placed all the active bits in a small ziploc baggie for insulation and
closed up the case. I do have a replacement 48T02 on order ($15 from Mouser),
but for now, I'm running.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
> Since I only have v1.1 to examine and it doesn't have a DR notice,
>maybe that's why there's a v1.1 :-).
Exactly! That is why I said V1.0. finding a copy of 1.0 is the challenge.
There are other signatures. Check the bytes following all the RET
instructions. as there were some funnies there. Keep in mind you
have to look in the BDOS for all this as the BIOS is customer code
and the CCP is also modifyable. In DOS most of that is embedded
in the command.com.
Allison
>> This was the smaller BA23? if so then the slot next to the m7516 is the
>> bus grant break
>I Thought on the BA123-bus the first 4 quad slots had an AB/CD
>configuration but I'll try this one.
See the excerpted comment from the earlier message.
The BA23 and BA123 differ in the number of Q/CD slots with the BA123
having more.
Allison
I'm looking for a good spot to call home for my classiccmp related web pages
(lotsa images&scans). I'd love to get it all under ARSDigitia ala
http://photo.net but last time I checked, it required a Sun/AOLServer/Oracle
trinity, so a few megabytes and a cool name will do... Oh yeah, free would
be nice too. ;)
Any suggestions?
Thanks
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
I don't *think* this is OT, I don't see any IC date codes newer than '89...
Is anyone here familiar with the inner workings of a Kennedy 9662 tape
drive? FWIW, I think the 9610/9612/9660/9662 are all essentially the same
drive, depending on the combination of {rack mount vs. table top} and {Pertec
vs. SCSI}.
My problem is, the drive keeps giving "TAK ARM?" errors, which according
to the manual, means there's some problem with the takeup arm (i.e. the
motor-driven arm which has the takeup pulley on it). I've been all through
the manual section on how to adjust the various relevant sensors and I *think*
I've got it more or less happy. I fiddled with the height of the capacitive
disk thingy (which evidently is what encodes the arm position for the on-board
micro), it was way off but now I'm getting more or less the voltage spread
that the manual asks for and the "zero" position does give 0.0V.
But I'm totally stuck with what to do next, partly because there are some
differences between my drive and what's in the manual. The manual claims
that there's a mechanical limit adjustment, but there's nothing in the
area where the arrow points (it's not even visible on their sketch so I
don't know what they mean here). The cam that drives the micro switch to
set the limit of arm travel is nothing like what's in the book, I've been
dinking with its set screw trying to move the limit one way or the other
but the same mechanism seems to be what drives the *actual* mechanical limit
(there's one peg which pushes another) and I don't seem to have independent
control over them -- maybe that's on purpose since the manual wants the
switch limit set a fixed angle past the mechanical limit (I would think
they'd want it the other way around though???).
Anyway I have no idea what to do next, is this familiar territory for any
of you folks? FWIW the drive gave the same message when I first got it, but
after I randomly poked and prodded around the takeup arm a bit it magically
started working. So of course I'm suspicious that the actual problem is just
a flakey connector or something (I've wiggled them all again) and not the
mechanical adjustment at all, although as I say the range that the encoder
was giving was all wrong. Unless it's actually my manual that's all wrong.
I'd really like to bring this thing back to live, it was a wonderful
tape drive.
Thanks,
John Wilson
D Bit
Y'all may recall I wrote a couple weeks back about needing an NEC APC
to try to read these disks that a geophysicist sent me so Guatemala can
find all their precious resources.
Fast forward a few weeks: I spent an hour or so digging around my
warehouse and managed to locate and then extricate the NEC APC I
had. Tonight I finally got around to checking it out again (I got it over 4
years ago and when I played with it then I couldn't get anything to come
up on it). Well tonight I was fiddling with it and realized the brightness
knob was turned all the way down. It turns out this thing works after all!
The system came with 2 disks in the drives when I received it. One in
the A drive is labeled "SYS" and the other in the B drive something else,
it's not important, since the system is trying to boot from A.
When I first turn it on, the upper lefthand corner of the screen shows
"[LOD]" and the disk light comes on. Actually, there are two red LEDs
per drive. The bottom light is always on, and it seems when it's reading
a disk the top one turns on. It tries the A drive and then displays "[LOD
C]" and momentarily accesses the B drive. Then I get "[LER]".
So I need to know what this all means. I'm assuming that either the
disks are bad or the drive heads are dirty. Of course there may be
something worse going on but I'm an optimist (mostly).
So I could use the following if you've got it:
a) information from the system manuals that explain the boot process.
I've got the manuals but there is no way in hell I'd be able to find them
without a full-scale re-organization of my warehouse, which I hope to do
in my lifetime but definitely don't have the time for right now.
b) a known good copy of a system disk.
This is an NEC APC model APC-H02. The floppies are 8".
Any help will be greatly appreciated and if we are successful with getting
the data off you will be given credit for your assistance!! Remember,
goats and village women!
As ever, please reply directly to me as I am not subscribed to
ClassicCmp.
sellam(a)vintage.org
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF Europe: April 29th & 30th, Munich, Germany
VCF Los Angeles: Summer 2000 (*TENTATIVE*)
VCF East: Planning in Progress
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
finally success !!!
With only the CPU and the memory boards and the RDQ3 in the system I was
able
to boot into VMS 5.5. Had to reboot with "b /1" and "set uafalternate 1" to
circumvent the
login but it worked.
Now let's start some serious learning about VMS ;-)
Tomorrow we'll see about the other boards and the batteries are propably
gone
but those things seem manageble now
thanx everyone for the help
sipke
I'm CC'ing this to classiccmp and port-vax because what I have is
pertinent to anyone using rackmount hardware (or VME boards).
Both items are LOCAL PICKUP ONLY, Kent, Washington (southeast of Seattle).
NON-FREEBIE... Asking $50.00 or best offer.
Five-foot tall enclosed equipment rack for 19" hardware. Cosmetically OK,
some scratching of the paint, no dents or drops that I can see.
Rails front and back are pre-drilled and tapped for standard 10-32 screws.
Has 'wiremold' brand plug strip mounted along one side to the rear, and a
humongous (12" at least) cooling fan in the bottom.
Said fan draws air through a removable/cleanable aluminum-mesh filter on
the bottom/front, then blows it up from the bottom of the cabinet. It's
noisy, but it moves a load of air! The power cord for said fan was frayed
and cracking, so I cut it off. Can be easily replaced.
It's on wheels, and includes a magnetic-latch rear door. Black/Light Tan
color scheme.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
FREE TO A GOOD HOME...
Charles River Data Systems VME Chassis, Rackmount (std. 19"), with slides.
Eight-slot, if I recall correctly, big beefy power supply, plenty of I/O
connectors, and space to mount hard drives (5.25 or 3.5, your choice).
Heck, I think I may even have the key for the keyswitch up front.
If you buy the rack, and then decide you want the chassis, great. If not,
said chassis is a first-come, first-served freebie.
Thanks much!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Yes, decidedly off topic but I intend for this msg to be the initial
contact for answers to my questions. This shall be discussed further
off-list, not here.
I hope there are one or more folks who read this who've worked on or at
least been around old time race cars which used Sun Tachometers and have an
answer to the following:
I'm trying to restore a Sun Tachometer Transmitter for a friend who's
furiously trying to finish his 1953-vintage Kurtis Kraft race car
restoration project before the upcoming AACA show season. It is a
magneto-type ignition system and he's found a used Transmitter. Model
number is EB37, MAGneto type and it is hung off a Ford Flathead V8.
There are two batteries mounted inside the unit, obviously because often
race cars with magneto ignition have no need of a battery whether it be 6V
or 12V. They _look_ like NiCd cells, maybe 600-800 mAh capacity, but I'm
not 100% sure. This unit is from back in the late 1950's and has a "1058"
rubber-stamped in orange ink on the back of the case - I suspect Oct, 1958.
Would anybody be able to confirm if these are indeed NiCd cells? Reason I'm
not sure is I haven't found when NiCd batteries actually came into use and
I believe they are a 60's invention, not 50's which this Sun unit evidently
dates to. If not NiCd, what are they?
Thanks for your time!
Regards, Chris
-- --
Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
Member of Antique Wireless Association
URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
>I hope there are one or more folks who read this who've worked on or at
>least been around old time race cars which used Sun Tachometers and have an
>answer to the following:
>
>I'm trying to restore a Sun Tachometer Transmitter for a friend who's
>furiously trying to finish his 1953-vintage Kurtis Kraft race car
>restoration project before the upcoming AACA show season. It is a
>magneto-type ignition system and he's found a used Transmitter. Model
>number is EB37, MAGneto type and it is hung off a Ford Flathead V8.
>
>There are two batteries mounted inside the unit, obviously because often
>race cars with magneto ignition have no need of a battery whether it be 6V
>or 12V. They _look_ like NiCd cells, maybe 600-800 mAh capacity, but I'm
>not 100% sure. This unit is from back in the late 1950's and has a "1058"
>rubber-stamped in orange ink on the back of the case - I suspect Oct, 1958.
They are likely mercury cells, I used to have to find them for the tach(SUN)
in the crown Vicki my brother had. common was the 5.8V/250mah.
>Would anybody be able to confirm if these are indeed NiCd cells? Reason I'm
>not sure is I haven't found when NiCd batteries actually came into use and
>I believe they are a 60's invention, not 50's which this Sun unit evidently
Nicads are quite old. Though the common form on the 50s-60s was the wet
cells that looked like lead acid. They were also available as hermetic
(well sorta) then and not cheap.
Allison
>>just an OBTW: I use QB45, if someone didn't take the minor effort to
>>complie to an .EXE
>>and instead used BRUN.... well they did their own disservice.
>>
>>Allison
>
>I don't think the MS qbasic for the mac ever offered a option to compile.
>Basically nothing that was done with the package will run past about OS 7.1
>if that, so if it was just being stupid, everybody was. Good reason to keep
>a few old macs around to play the old games etc.
My fault, I assumed it was PC and dos world. I have no clue on MACs and
can almost recognize one 2:3 tries.
Allison
>On Sat, Apr 08, 2000 at 12:18:23AM -0700, Mike Ford wrote:
>> I was speaking in reference only to MicroSoft QuickBasic, and quite a few
>> people were more than miffed when MS pulled the plug on it since the
>> applications they wrote depended on a runtime module from MS. And yes I
just an OBTW: I use QB45, if someone didn't take the minor effort to
complie to an .EXE
and instead used BRUN.... well they did their own disservice.
Allison
In a message dated 4/8/00 12:48:11 Central Daylight Time, pryor(a)wi.net writes:
> Mike,
> I'll repeat my offer of $100 if you still have this stuff.
> Jim
Jim - also, I travel almost every week so let me know when you plan to pick
up. Make sure you have room for all the books and other junk. The only item
I can't find is the 8" drive. Probably went with the H-89 stuff I sold last
month.
Know anyone that is looking for an H-89? I found another one while I was
cleaning off shelves.
Mike Stover, KB9VU
CCA# 404
MARS AFA3BO
Florissant, MO
In a message dated 4/8/00 12:48:11 Central Daylight Time, pryor(a)wi.net writes:
> Mike,
> I'll repeat my offer of $100 if you still have this stuff.
> Jim
>
>
OK Jim - come get it.
Mike
Mike Stover, KB9VU
CCA# 404
MARS AFA3BO
Florissant, MO
I have an operational H/Z-110 low profile computer with the Zenith Color monitor. Unit has dual hard drives and a floppy installed internally. MB is the last revision produced and has 768K loaded. The optional Gemini card to run PCDOS (IBM) native programs is also installed. Outboard Zenith 8" floppy drive in the factory enclosure.
Original User Manuals, Technical Manuals and Service Manual set with all service bulletins included.
ZDOS, MSDOS version 2, CP/M-80, CP/M-86 operating systems.
Several applications software items including Wordstar, Multiplan, Condor, and others (15 original 3 ring binder documentation sets) and other user software totalling over 200 5.25" disks.
$150 for the whole lot. Pick up in the St. Louis area. I need to get this system out of the way and into a new home for someone to use. Help!
Thanks
Mike Stover, Florissant, MO
>Running Telemate as a terminal program i cannot set Hardware
>flowcontrol on cause it tells me that CTS=off (baud = 4800)
Hardware flow control? Gack. You want absolutely no hardware flow
control, you want software flow control (XON/XOFF) only. My favorite
terminal emulator for a PC-clone box is MS-Kermit, available for free
>from ftp://kermit.columbia.edu/ , and this will do the job quite nicely.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
From: "Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner" <spc(a)armigeron.com> and
the Great Richard Erlacher once stated:
> > Tim Patterson, who wrote the initial version of MS-DOS while at Seattle
> > Products, may have had access to CP/M sources since Seattle Products sol
d
> > CP/M systems and they were working on an 8086 based computer in the late
> > 70s. Tim probably modeled his QDOS (Quick-n-Dirty Operating System) clo
sely
> > after CP/M (some say he may have mechanically translated CP/M since
> > copyright statements to Digital Research have allegedly been found in MS
-DOS
> > 1.x but I haven't seen any). Why not? It would have been a quick and e
asy
> > way to get an OS for the 8086 system up and running.
>
> I've heard that, too. Does that mean that anyone who writes a program to
do
> what he's seen another program do is making a copy?
>>> Ask the lawyers or philosophers.
I have a copy of DOS 1.1 that I've done a Sourcer disassembly of. I have
not found anything referring to DR or CP/M anywhere in the resulting source.
Now, one thought that I had is that there may be a sequence of code
bytes unique to CP/M that was duplicated in DOS (nee, QDOS) by
virtue of directly copying the CP/M source. This would produce a
unique and identifyable signature.
Since I only have v1.1 to examine and it doesn't have a DR notice,
maybe that's why there's a v1.1 :-).
If anyone has a copy of 1.0 that they can send me to work on, I'll
do a book report for y'all...
Rich
[ Rich Cini
[ ClubWin!/CW1
[ MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
[ Collector of "classic" computers
[ http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
<================ reply separator =================>
Digging up some literature on the web about the uVAX II console cable
I've ran into some conflicting info:
Story I
| The MicroVAXII serial console port is:
|
| 9 pin D with pinout
| 1 - grnd
| 2,3 - snd, rcv (crossed to terminal for partial null modem)
| 8 to 9 - shorted together
| (I think, I don't have a manual handy. If I'm wrong would someone please
| correct me.)
Story II
|The pinout is a bit strange:
|DE-9 (DEC) DB-25 (PC)
|1 1
|2 3
|3 2
|4 5
|5 6
|6 20
|7 7
|8 -\
|9 -/ (short 8 & 9) together
I have made the latter cable but adapted it to a 9 pin PC-serial
connector and I am pretty certain it is wired ok.
Running Telemate as a terminal program i cannot set Hardware
flowcontrol on cause it tells me that CTS=off (baud = 4800)
I get no characters on the terminal when I startup uVAX (BA123).
It sounds like the HD's restore OK and the little display at
the bulkhead says C after first showing a few other characters.
Pressing the restart/run button seems to have some effect because
I can see a few leds on the TQK50 blink for an instance (The box
is open but the cabinet-open switch is taped into the on position)
What's is wrong ?
Does anyone have a clue
>DOS and Windoze (aka kluge of the month club). CP/M I seem to remember
only
>got to 2.2. MS-DOS got to 6.22, and gosh knows how many kluges there will
the CPM line I remember is:
Dates are appoximate.
1.3 1976
1.4 1977
2.0 (2.2 released) 1980
MPM 1981
3.0 (aka cpm+) 1982
CPnet 1983
Allison
Hi,
I'm just back from InternetWorld, where I had a funny iOpener
experience...
They had a unit embedded in the front face of a refrigerator
(touch-screen) at their display booth. At the end of the spokesmodel's
little presentation (and I emphasize the word model - what all those
beautiful women have to do with computers is beyond me), I couldn't resist
tossing out, "Yeah, that's cool, but can you hack it to run Linux?" I must
have been the 10,000th person to ask that day because she just snapped and
started yelling at me, "will you people leave us alone about this! Jesus!"
But it was too late...some other guy yelled, "yeah, but hurry and buy one
before they pour epoxy in the back of it..."
Cheers,
Aaron
>Since MUCH fewer than 1% of the people who use MS products are engagedin
>activity which would make them aware of the differences and similarities
>between MS-DOS and CP/M if they knew both OS' I'd have to say the internals
>are really never going to be part of a legal argument. Most judges, after
>all, don't write their own programs.
Be aware that the judge did decide and MS was in trouble.
In reality similar and copied were the issues then. User interfaces are
less protected.
I live in both worlds, both user and systems designer/programmer. So I have
an
appreciation of both sets of issues. To me MS makes both sides of the coin
harder
as it's hard to program defensively from an OS that eats itself while
calling itself protected.
Though I am finding NT4 a vast improvement.
Allison
>class) machines; hind sight and all that. And I'm not even saying it was
>wrong for Tim Patterson to model the OS calls after CP/M. After all,
that's
>what he knew.
Ahem, pattern after? it was wholesale copy of CPM1.3 lofted to 8086
after which the ALLOC code was replaced with FAT. (saved buffer space in
ram)
> I would say that the roots of MS-DOS 1.x are entirely in CP/M, while with
>2.x the influence of other operating systems (notably Unix) start to show
This is very true. Mostly because of the copying that was done. DOS 2.0
had to
have similar functionality and yet be different plus CPM and DOS 1.0 lacked
some needed features seen in VMS, UNIX, and others.
>up. Then again, CP/M wasn't created wholecloth either, it had roots from
>RT-11 (I think that's the OS), which Gary Kildall had experience with.
True but the user appearance is only similar, the internal differences
are significant. (Actually it was TOPS10 and OS/8) but they differ even
more.
>> I've heard that, too. Does that mean that anyone who writes a program to
do
>> what he's seen another program do is making a copy?
>
> Ask the lawyers or philosophers.
>
>> You're not even sure he
>> actually saw and read the source code. How many programmers do you know
>> who'd simply copy someone else's work in a case like this? Everybody
wants
>> to leave his own mark.
By then most everyone had disassembled CPM and it was a trivial task as it
was
only 3.5k of 8080 code! Legit copies were even available to some people.
Also there were clones of CPM (P2dos for example) and Turbodos.
Allison
>DEC lives in my heart forever. I bleed DEC Vax blue and PDP11
>Magenta (sorry LCG guys... no China Red).
Same here... I've been to the mill a few times since DEC sold it...
I never go there without my original DEC badge...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
On April 7, Huw Davies wrote:
> > I heard that DEC is making PCs and laptops these days that come bundled
> > with Windows.
>
> Unless I'm sadly mistaken, DEC no longer exists.
So they got bought. I can still pick up the phone and order a VAX
or an Alpha...and get a damn good machine. As long as I can do
that, DEC exists.
-Dave McGuire
>Try running Wordperfects Drawperfect 2.0 even today unde DOS 7.0 without
>adequate FCBS (min: FCBS=2,0 in config.sys) and it won't work.
>
>FCBS are still among us, like the rudimentary footbones in a whale.
Big time. I run Champion/dos at work (financial package) under W95 and
it don't run unless FCBS=80 (minimum!). I won't say more about Paradox/dos.
Allison
>SCP and Micros~1 had had prior dealings, including sharing computer faire
>booths, etc. In the course of those encounters, Patterson had seen the
>F.A.T. structure used in the stand-alone BASIC that Micros~1 peddled to
Fat was used in the Z80 basics from MS. Systems of not that had it were
TANDY,
NCR, NEC and a few others of the z80/cpm world.
Side tidbit...
8086/88 part was available around 1978 (late) and systems using it were
around in
1979. S100 and other systems were starting to build on it by late 1979 and
DRI was
late with CPM86. Hence the 8085/8088 boards for S100 and the other machine
like
rainbow that had z80/8088. There was at least on OS that ran on 8086/8
before DOS
and that was a IRMX and I think ISIS-II as well.
Allison
I've also found a RF72 drive. I first thought it was a RD54 but on closer
inspection
it turns out to be a RF72. What i've read is that it has a capacity of 1GB
and needs an
DSSI-controller
Can any one tell me what DSSI is and if there exists a DSSI-controller for
a uVAX II ?
I Don't know if the beast is still in working order but I'm curious anyway.
Sipke de Wal
Sorry about this, but I was corresponding with Bill about some
items and haven't heard from him since the 21st....just wondering if
he was having email difficulties or hardware problems....
Thanks.
Paul Braun
NerdWare -- The History of the PC and the Nerds who brought it to you.
nerdware(a)laidbak.com
www.laidbak.com/nerdware
--- CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
> >> Sure, get a MJ11 memory box (or, rather, 4 times as many MJ11's as you
> >> had MK11's) :-).
>
> >Umm... sure. _That's_ an improvement.
>
> Hey, but it's real core!
Ah! That _is_ an improvement. I only have core on my 11/20 (unrestored)
and 11/05 (similarly unrestored). All of my working PDP-11s are MOS-based.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Since Anthony Clifton volunteered to drive to minneapolis and grab virtually
al of the small VAX stuff that i mentioned yesterday, i'll just let him
have the stuff (assuming thats ok with the professor who is disposing
of the stuff).
Thanks for your interest, and i'll keep posting if i find more stuff that
i dont want or need.
-Lawrence LeMay
--- Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu> wrote:
> There is a VAX 11/730 available in Minneapolis. Obviously i'm not shipping
> it, or having anything to do with it. if you want it, and can come tpick it
> up in minneapolis, i can put you in contact with the person who has it.
>
> Otherwise, i will of course attempt to grab any useful boards and such
> before it goes to the recyclers. At that time, i would then post what
> is available to the list.
Which style is it? One style has disks above and below the CPU (11/730-Z?),
the other has the CPU in something that's more like a BA-11 with the TU-58
at the top of the rack. I have one of the ultra-cramped ones with the CPU
in the middle. I don't have one with the CPU at the top.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
--- CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com wrote:
> >Does anybody know if it's possible to run an 11/70 without the MK11 memory
> >box ?
>
> Sure, get a MJ11 memory box (or, rather, 4 times as many MJ11's as you
> had MK11's) :-).
Umm... sure. _That's_ an improvement.
> There are several other third-party memory boxes/cards available too.
How many of these are floating around these days? Serious question, no
smiley. I have two PDP-11/70s, both with, I assume, MK11 boxes and am
interested in low-power alternatives for memory.
> Out of curiosity, why can't you use your MK11's? Not enough power to
> run them and the 11/70 at the same time? I had to take multiple 15A
> circuits to run my 11/70 with MJ11 memory boxes.
In _my_ case, power is the issue. I have a 60A circuit for the entire
outbuilding that houses my larger stuff, none of which is powered on
at the moment. I need to wire up a 30A Hubble Twist-n-lock outlet so
I can plug in either an 11/750 or an 11/70 out there, but once I do,
I'll be interested in firing up one of the beasts.
Just so I'm not making a serious assumtion here, an MK11 is the high-
density memory cabinet for the 11/70, right? What I have is an entire
H960 rack with one BA-11 that houses 16 256K boards (mess-o-4116 DRAMs)
and some incidental memory controller cards. Do I have what I think
I have?
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
>> Sure, get a MJ11 memory box (or, rather, 4 times as many MJ11's as you
>> had MK11's) :-).
>Umm... sure. _That's_ an improvement.
Hey, but it's real core!
>> There are several other third-party memory boxes/cards available too.
>How many of these are floating around these days? Serious question, no
>smiley.
Probably pretty difficult to find.
>> Out of curiosity, why can't you use your MK11's? Not enough power to
>> run them and the 11/70 at the same time? I had to take multiple 15A
>> circuits to run my 11/70 with MJ11 memory boxes.
>Just so I'm not making a serious assumtion here, an MK11 is the high-
>density memory cabinet for the 11/70, right? What I have is an entire
>H960 rack with one BA-11 that houses 16 256K boards (mess-o-4116 DRAMs)
>and some incidental memory controller cards. Do I have what I think
>I have?
The "original" MK11 goes up to 1 Mbyte in a box, according to my books.
It certainly was common to see them upgraded in the field to the configuration
that you have, though I don't know what the official DEC designation for
the high-density version was.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
> > Package a) a sole device USD 499,
> > Package b) the device and a 24 Month contract USD 99 + 24 x 20
> Or the common package C) box is part of the service and "rented". Cable
> boxes especially encoded ones are that case here (usa).
Yeah, but there are many places in the US where it is essentially illegal
to hook your own cable descrambler to the cable line, not too much different
than the old Bell System limits on third-party equipment hooked to phone
lines.
There are some attractions to cheap and uniform guaranteed service for
all, but I don't think I want Internet access to become the monopoly
that phone service used to be or cable service is today. It's bad enough
with some ISP's threatening that they only support Microsoft Windows
and that if you've got trouble accessing their service from any other
OS you're out of luck.
Actually DSL from some companies is already worse than that - you have
to have a PCI-bus PC-clone running Windows to use their service,
because the only interface device that will work requires that
hardware configuration and the only drivers available are for
MS-Windows.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
--- John Lewczyk <jlewczyk(a)his.com> wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_698000/698804.stm
>
> An Enigma machine used by the Nazis to send coded messages during World War
> Two, has been stolen from the code-cracking Station X at Bletchley Park,
> Buckinghamshire. The machine, worth about £100,000, is one of only three in
> the world. It was brought to the UK after the war.
>
> I bet it was somebody on this list who grabbed it! Fess up! ;-)
The closest I've come is photographing the one at the Deutches Museum on
my recent trip to visit Hans.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
John,
I have VAX C also if that would help... I'd offer you OS/32 C, but I don't
think you have an Interdata/Perkin-Elmer/Concurrent, heh.
Will J
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Richard,
This must have been said a lot of times, but I say it anyway. I have been
putting computers into factories and when you took a DEC PDP-11 you did not
have to worry so much about next months software. About drivers you would
have to write all over again. About being able to service a 5, 10, 15 year
old or even older application, even in far away countries. Yes, you paid,
but what about the cost of installing a new system every 3 or 4 years
because hardware is no longer supported with the new release or the new
version, or the hardware was phased out after months and spares no longer
exist.
This new hardware is ageing so fast that the Salvation Army is collecting
it by the time you paid for it. It is marvelous for a lot of people, but
keep it out of the factories.
Wim
----------
> From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: !Re: Nuke Redmond!
> Date: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:20 PM
>
> I really can't understand what all the hostility toward Microsoft is
about.
> If it weren't for the low prices resulting from the economy of scale,
scale
> which is enabled by the fact that Microsoft made computers simple enough
to
> use that the masses could and would use them.
>
> If you want to dog somebody, the go after DEC, (God be thanked that
they're
> gone!) with their antiquated technology always a generation behind
everyone
> else and with their ridiculous prices.
>
> If DEC had had their way you'd have to use a single flip=flop pair for
which
> they charged you 10^15 bucks per year and which broke twice a month so
some
> under-trained ignoramus could come around and pretend to fix the thing.
> Then, if you had the unmitigated audacity to try to use some other
vendor's
> hardware or software, they'd raise hell and point down the wire if their
> stuff didn't behave as claimed.
>
> The only point I've seen in this thread that makes any sense at all is
the
> one about Visual Basic. If your really want that 6-7 figure income,
you'll
> learn it. I know at least half a dozen fellows who have taken that up.
>
> Forget about the C++ or C or Delphi! These guys took 6 weeks to learn
the
> VB and now most of them have paid off their houses, cards, and credit
cards
> and vacation in Arruba in the winter and Alaska in the summer. at least
> twice. The oldest of the guys I know doing this is 35 and worth over
$10^7
> net. Five years ago, he was begging me for work. How many guys do you
know
> who have net savings of over a year's gross after only five years? That
> certainly indicates VB is not just a joke.
>
> Dick
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Nuke Redmond!
>
>
> > Huw Davies wrote:
> > > I was at the Programming sectin of the local Computer Book store last
> > > week, only to discover that "Programming" == Visual Basic, C on
Windows
> > > and that's about it.
> >
> > Don't you know, being able to write in Visual Basic is what all
computer
> > professionals aspire to! Rumor has it Windows 2000 was written in
Visual
> > Basic.
> >
> > > I wonder what I learnt at Uni should be called? I used to program in
> Algol
> > > (60 and 68), Pascal, BCPL, Simula-67 and BLISS-10... At least one of
> them
> > > is still current!
> >
> > OK, I give up. Which one? I'm not aware of Microsoft having any
Windows
> > software by those names, therefore they don't exist, and never did!
> >
> > Zane
> >
> > PS let me just say for the benefit of anyone new here, I'm joking
folks!
>
>> their LAN boards incompatible with anyone else's. They also tweaked
>> their protocols to weaken their own networking system so people
>> wouldn't be tempted to mix and match.
That comment is pure cow-flop... I don't know a single engineer at DEC
(and now Compaq) who would ever have done this sort of thing...
>IP was not the rule until years after DECnet phaseIII and when IP started
>to become more wide spread there was PhaseIV and PHASEV decnet which was
>routable, capable of doing IP over decnet and a lot of other tricks that
>PCs needed. PCs under winders were doing lanman then.
Even so, much of the Internet network software has its roots on DEC
hardware... even if DEC wasn't doing it at the time...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
I'm told that the power supply in the 8/L i just acquired has a problem
with ripple in the 5 volt output, and thus it had started to crash
occasionally. I'm not sure how often it crashed, as they ran the thing
constantly, so their idea of a problem crashing might be different from
mine ;)
Still, if its still possible to obtain the correct capacitors, and it
looks like we're talking about coca-cola can sized capacitors, it would
make sense to replace them. So, i'd like to find a copy of the schematic
for the power supply if anyone has it.
-Lawrence LeMay
PS: Still looking for the power cable, so i havent turned it on yet...
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, April 06, 2000 5:53 PM
Subject: PDP 8/L power supply docs?
>I'm told that the power supply in the 8/L i just acquired has a problem
>with ripple in the 5 volt output, and thus it had started to crash
>occasionally. I'm not sure how often it crashed, as they ran the thing
>constantly, so their idea of a problem crashing might be different from
>mine ;)
>
>Still, if its still possible to obtain the correct capacitors, and it
>looks like we're talking about coca-cola can sized capacitors, it would
>make sense to replace them. So, i'd like to find a copy of the schematic
>for the power supply if anyone has it.
Caps and other parts can be had for it. You may end up paying a few bucks
for them but hey, their good for 20-30 years. Check Highgate for prints.
Allison
I just recieved this message from a co-worker of the professor who is
giving me some pdp8/pdp11 stuff. If there is some small VAX stuff
that you're looking for, let me know and i'l see if he has it and
if i can get it. otherwise, if you want something big you come get
it yourself, the stuff is in minneapolis.
by small stuff, i mean like a few memory or expansion interface boards,
etc.
------------------
John Broadhurst mentioned you were interested in some of his old PDP-11
equipment from the Tandem Lab. Thought I'd check, while I'm cleaning
up, if you have any interest in VAX equipment:-) John is still the
major repository, but I have a box of VMS docs I am getting ready to
pitch out. Some dates back to VMS v4, and there is also some media
("Desktop VMS", Online docs, etc) on CD. We also have some hardware we
are (ahem) unlikely to need again: VAXstation 2000s, some newer
VAXstations (3100-era), a historic RRD-40 CD drive, etc.
------------------
-Lawrence LeMay
lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
Sorry for the off-topic post, but this is the best
technical resource there is. Anyway, my company
recently had an IBM Thinkpad 770 go dead. It was
sent for repair and was finally deemed "cheeper to
replace than repair". My office is the official
company electronics/computer dumpster, so it ended
up here. The note stuck to it by the repair place
says "dead motherboard". I have dissassembled it
and now have a nice 15" TFT panel. Now to the
question: What is the interface to this thing?
There are 14 wires going into it. Two are pretty
obviously power for the backlight. They are at
the bottom of the panel and were attached next to
the slide pot that controlled the display brightness.
The other 12 are attached to a connector in about
the center of the panel. The IBM part number is
09J0940.
Thanks
>Does anybody know if it's possible to run an 11/70 without the MK11 memory
>box ?
Sure, get a MJ11 memory box (or, rather, 4 times as many MJ11's as you
had MK11's) :-).
>I know it can be done with the PEP "update",
There are several other third-party memory boxes/cards available too.
> but I was wondering if there
>is another way, possibly involving standard UNIBUS memory.
I do believe that there's an option to map some of the memory space on the
Unibus into memory space. It probably doesn't work correctly at all if
you're using the Massbus slots for I/O, though, and you certainly can't
get above 124 kWords doing this.
Out of curiosity, why can't you use your MK11's? Not enough power to
run them and the 11/70 at the same time? I had to take multiple 15A
circuits to run my 11/70 with MJ11 memory boxes.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Does anybody know if it's possible to run an 11/70 without the MK11 memory box ?
I know it can be done with the PEP "update", but I was wondering if there is another way, possibly involving standard UNIBUS memory.
Thanks,
Erik.
>It hurts my head trying to understand this. How the cable companies get
>their little whims written into law is beyond me. I mean anything's silly
>if you look close enough -- suppose my TV happens to be switchable to accept
>a video signal of either polarity (or whatever it is), how is it that that
>makes me a *criminal*?
Watch out - just tuning through certain high-numbered UHF channels is
now illegal, since the cellphone companies grabbed those frequencies and
then a few years later convinced congress that it's illegal for the general
public to tune in to those frequencies.
(As a practical matter, trying to listen to cellphone conversations with
an old TV is really, really tough, though you do get to hear bits and
pieces. Much better are the non-crippled scanners you can buy in Canada
and many other countries.)
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I'm getting closer! When I see the splash screen, I hit TAB and saw the
following Award BIOS startup screen:
Award Modular BIOS V4.51PG
Copyright (C) 1984-99, Award Software, Inc.
(IPS_TRI) EVALUATION ROM - NOT FOR SALE
IDT WinChip C6 CPU at 200MHz
Memory Test : 30720 + 2048K shared memory
Award Plug and Play BIOS Extension v1.0A
Copyright (C) 1999, Award Software, Inc.
Suggested SDRAM CAS Latency Time is " 2 "
Detecting IDE Primary Master ... None
Detecting IDE Primary Slave ... SunDisk SDTB-128
Your i-opener is undergoing a necessary update. This may
take 30 minutes or more. If for some reason the service
is not working correctly within an hour, please contact
Technical Support at 1-800-298-9525 to report the problem.
Press DEL to enter SETUP
10/01/1999-VP4-686-IPC_VIAC-00
When I hit CTRL-ALT-HOME, I get a "login:" prompt. The HOME,4 combo doesn't
get me a root prompt.
So close, and yet so far!! :-)
-- Tony
> ----------
> From: John Wilson[SMTP:wilson@dbit.dbit.com]
> Reply To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 12:35 AM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: iOpener Update
>
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Eros, Anthony wrote:
> > Has anyone else seen this? The only thing I get when I power up my
> iOpener
> > is a screen that says "Welcome! i-opener Out of the box. In the
> outlets. On
> > the counter. Nothin' but 'Net!" Nothing else. No other screens, or
> startup
> > messages. Control-alt-home, or home-4 do nothing.
>
> Press TAB as soon as you see this screen. It will switch to text mode
> and give you the usual Award BIOS startup screen. It will say press Del
> for setup, that's wrong, you need Ctrl/Alt/Esc, so you'll need to put on a
> keyboard that has an Esc key.
>
> John Wilson
> D Bit
>
"What He Said."
I was going to respond to Richard's email but you've said it all
here, Zane. I stand in agreement.
-Dave McGuire
On April 5, healyzh(a)aracnet.com wrote:
> > I really can't understand what all the hostility toward Microsoft is about.
> > If it weren't for the low prices resulting from the economy of scale, scale
> > which is enabled by the fact that Microsoft made computers simple enough to
> > use that the masses could and would use them.
>
> Well, in my case it started when I discovered that the copy of Visual Basic
> I bought wouldn't run under OS/2. This is DESPITE the fact that the box and
> manuals said it would!
>
> Then there is the issue of *stability*.
>
> Then there is the issue of *illegal* business practices.
>
> Then there is that question of innovation.
>
> Someone mind explaining why if I install software on a Microsoft system or
> make *very* minor changes I've got the reboot the @*& #$)@ thing?!?!
>
> I could go on and on, but I think you get the picture.
>
> > If you want to dog somebody, the go after DEC, (God be thanked that they're
> > gone!) with their antiquated technology always a generation behind everyone
> > else and with their ridiculous prices.
>
> Um, you do know that's flame bait in this group, and Microslop roasting is a
> regular hobby here? Personally I'll willingly pay more if it means I've got
> stability.
>
> > The only point I've seen in this thread that makes any sense at all is the
> > one about Visual Basic. If your really want that 6-7 figure income, you'll
> > learn it. I know at least half a dozen fellows who have taken that up.
>
> You know, I can't decide if that's a sad comment on the computer industry,
> or the United States.
>
> Zane
Has anyone else seen this? The only thing I get when I power up my iOpener
is a screen that says "Welcome! i-opener Out of the box. In the outlets. On
the counter. Nothin' but 'Net!" Nothing else. No other screens, or startup
messages. Control-alt-home, or home-4 do nothing.
Any suggestions?
-- Tony
> ----------
> From: ard@p850ug1.demon.co.uk[SMTP:ard@p850ug1.demon.co.uk]
> Reply To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 3:53 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: iOpener Update
>
> >
> > > Also apparently they've put in a really ugly "Terms of Sale".
> >
> > Particularly ugly - if you don't use their $21.95 month net access
> > service for their required period of time, they'll charge you $499.
> > If they don't have your credit card number, they'll send you a bill.
>
> What if you buy one in a shop, and pay cash for it? Or do they insist on
> being told your name and address?
>
> -tony
>
>I just left CC and they would not sell me the demo unit saying that had to
>RETURN ALL the old units they had for the new model. Makes me think they
>had some ones in stock. And they will not take orders for the new model
>right now. SUCKS
I would have faced them down using BAIT and SWITCH as the cause. Which
is what is being done. I plan to drop in on CC friday after work likely to
cancle
as things is getting to be more of a project if it progresses along the
current
path. I have other projects I need tp put the time to. Unlike some I paid
in full,
so I feel I can demand product under conditions at time of sale, 3/13! All
in all
a big pain.
Allison
>time to write anything. I will have some people come over and feed in the
>paper tape this weekend. While I won't be able to archive most of it, I do
>hope to at least read in most of the source code on paper tape. (I have over
>310 PDP-1 paper tapes alone).
So how did the archiving go? Find any notable gems you're dying to tell
us about?
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
-----Original Message-----
From: CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com <CLASSICCMP(a)trailing-edge.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:15 PM
Subject: RE: I need some PDP-11 RT11 archiving software
>>time to write anything. I will have some people come over and feed in the
>>paper tape this weekend. While I won't be able to archive most of it, I do
>>hope to at least read in most of the source code on paper tape. (I have
over
>>310 PDP-1 paper tapes alone).
>
>So how did the archiving go?
Like shit. <pardon the expression>
> Find any notable gems you're dying to tell
>us about?
>
I was amazed with just how much paper tape software I had (not including
dectapes,disks, etc..). I had source code to every language and package ever
put out for the PDP-1. As for the PDP-11, I saved source code to the first
RSX-11 version, DOS/Batch, and paper tape operating system.
There was over 400 blue trays of paper tape (packed) for the
PDP-1,4,5,8,9,11,... I have been working 15 hour days with 3 others over the
past 13 days just to pack the collection and test each minicomputer and
peripheral. I am going out to the *new* home of my collection in a couple of
months and will archive most of the PDP-1 and the rest of the 11 software
there. It's in a *much* better home as this buyer has the capital to keep
this collection running well into the next millenium.
I backed up some of the PDP-1 software (about 10 tapes) but concentrated on
the PDP-8/11 software as private collectors want that kind of software
installed when I sell a mini.
I am looking forward to heading out to the west coast. I *really* wanted to
archive Fortran Source code for the PDP-1 but ran out of time and couldn't
hold up shippers.
I do feel kind of down though... I *really* liked my PDP-8/S minicomputers
but they are going to a better home...
As for documentation, I saved a copy of the Classic-8 maintenance manual (I
had 3). I understand quite a few people are looking for it... I will scan it
in next week when things quiet down. {many other "training manuals/prints"
were copied}
If there are still licensing issues over RSX-11B,C and others (licensing 30
year old software?? - crazy!) then I can email it to you or others next
week.
P.S. I did save the source code to PDP-1 DECUS "7A" - Expensive Typewriter.
Next week I wil be packing some wishlist items, other promised pieces and
*finally* ship them out.
john
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>
> Also apparently they've put in a really ugly "Terms of Sale".
Particularly ugly - if you don't use their $21.95 month net access
service for their required period of time, they'll charge you $499.
If they don't have your credit card number, they'll send you a bill.
See
https://secure.netpliance.com/store/terms_sale.asp
(Why you need a security-enabled browser to look at their terms
and conditions, I don't know. But at the bottom of that page they
encourage you to e-mail them with the name and address of anyone who
has violated their policies by doing as much as disassembling
or modifying the device.)
Makes $99 sound like not so much of a bargain anymore, huh?
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
My uVAX may have had some 4 or 8port serial card that was removed. The RS232
connectors are still present on the back. Now in the cardcage it seems a
card is missing.
Would that be a problem ? (bus continuity)
this is the current situation
Slot ... 6 5 4 3 2 1
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
(X) | M | M | M | M | M |
7555 7516 7609 7609 7606
| DI- | M | (X) | | | |
LOG 7546
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
The first 3 cards are Quad but the bottom position
of slot 4 is empty (X) as is the top slot 6
Would that be ok ?
Sipke
--- Lawrence LeMay <lemay(a)cs.umn.edu> wrote:
> Can RK05's from a PDP11 system be used on a PDP8? Do i need to find
> special disk cartridges?
16-bit machines (PDP-11) use 12 sector cartridges. 12-bit machines (PDP-8)
use 16-sector cartridges. The difference is in how many saw cuts are made
in the aluminum rim on the bottom. While it is *theoretically* possible
to plug the wrong cuts and make new ones in the correct place, I am not
aware of anyone attempting this, let alone succeeding.
I myself have a quantity of 12-sector packs and 1 16-sector pack (formatted
for an RK05F) (and no RK8E)
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Anyone have a terminal (serial?) card for an MAI BASIC 4 to help that guy?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 13:39:50 CLT
From: Luis Alejandro Peña Ramirez <douglas772(a)hotmail.com>
Gentlemen:
We are a small store; SOLARI Y CIA. LTDA. Located in pais of CHILE, city of
ARICA, My problem is the following one; We have a computer MAI BASIC FOUR,
with the following ones: Characteristic:
MAI BASIC FOUR 7.2 R Model 1800
Unix Propietari NO Standard
UNIX operating system (BOSS/IX)
In this machine there is a program build in language Business BASIC, the
operating system BOSS/IX that have the advantages of UNIX. And the Business
applications and associated data files
The main problem is in which the card multi port that it connects the
terminals this card I burn myself due to a blow of current. Good we needed
to acquire with extreme urgency this card, because we needed to continue
operating with the terminals. The characteristics of the card are the
following ones:
CARD:
Multi Port to 8 terminal
ISA 16 bits
Conectors : RJ
I need information Cost of the card, Cost of send, and more information
about purchase of hardware of MAI BASIC FOUR. (CHIP of serial number of
machine)
I wait for a very quick answer, thank you very much by from now on.
Luis Peña Rámirez
Ingenier of Computation and informatic
Email: douglas772(a)hotmail.com
miguelarias66(a)latinmail.com
Adreess: ARICA, CHILE: 21 de MAYO #221
Phone: (056)09-8360545
(056)(052)225020
P.D.: The information send me in Spanish, please. (If us do). If you don`t
help me. Need information the other place (e-mail, HTTP, phone) where help
me, with this hardware.
En Español:
Señores WAL ENTER:
Nosotros somos una pequeña tienda; SOLARI Y CIA. LTDA. Ubicada en el pais de
CHILE, ciudad de ARICA, Mi problema es el siguiente; Tenemos un computador
MAI BASIC FOUR, con las siguientes :
Caracteristicas:
MAI BASIC FOUR 7.2 R Model 1800
Unix Propietari NO Standard
UNIX operating system (BOSS/IX)
En esta maquina hay un programa implentado en lenguaje Business BASIC, el
sistema Operativo BOSS/IX que reune las ventajas de Unix.
El problema principal radica en que la tarjeta multi puerta que conecta los
terminales, esta tarjeta se quemo debido a un golpe de corriente. Bueno
necesitamos adquirir con suma urgencia esta tarjeta, debido a que
necesitamos seguir operando con los terminales. Las caracteristicas de la
tarjeta son las siguientes:
Multi Port to 8 terminal
ISA 16 bits
Conectors : RJ
Necesito información de Costo de la tarjeta, Costo de envio, y más
información acerca de compra de hardware de MAI BASIC FOUR. (Chip de número
de serie del equipo)
Espero una muy pronta respuesta, muchas gracias por desde ahora.
Luis Peña Rámirez
Ingeniero en Computacion e informatica
Email: douglas772(a)hotmail.com
miguelarias66(a)latinmail.com
direccion: ARICA, CHILE: 21 de MAYO #221
telefono: (056)09-8360545
(056)(052)225020
P.D.: La información por favor enviemela en Español. (Si se puede). Si no
pueden ayudarme le agradeceria que me dieran informacion de otro lugar donde
pueda acudir para comprar este hardware(e-mail, HTTP, telefono).
Your office software vendor has been found guilty of monopolistic business
practices, so...
"You must ask yourself 'What would Jesus do?'"
He'd ditch MS-Office and boot up WordPerfect, of course!
(Sorry - couldn't resist... So the rumor that Bill Gates is the Second
Coming isn't true?)
---
>
>Jesus needs WordPerfect 5.1. Can you help him out? Please reply to Jesus
>directly.
>
Bill Richman
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r
(Home of the COSMAC Elf
microcomputer simulator!)
Jesus needs WordPerfect 5.1. Can you help him out? Please reply to Jesus
directly.
Reply-to: jdiaz(a)turbo.kean.edu
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 20:12:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: DIAZ <jdiaz(a)turbo.kean.edu>
To: vcf(a)vintage.org
Subject: A QUESTION ABOUT VCF
I cannot be present at the Festival, yet I wonder if I can somehow find
out if someone has, and wants to sell, WordPerfect 5.1.
Though I will carefully test and screen for viruses any such software, my
intuition tells me your source is far more reliable than trying to get it
through e-bay.
Looking forward to your response.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus A. Diaz
Philosophy Department
Kean University
Union, NJ 07083 USA
(908) 527-2311 (voice) / (908) 289-1397 (fax)
WWW = http://www.kean.edu (Kean University's Home Page)
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF Europe: April 29th & 30th, Munich, Germany
VCF Los Angeles: Summer 2000 (*TENTATIVE*)
VCF East: Planning in Progress
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
A RP03 i'm told is a multi-platter drive for a PDP11. Does anyone know
anything else about it? How much storage are we talking about, compared to
an RK05?
Can RK05's from a PDP11 system be used on a PDP8? Do i need to find
special disk cartridges?
-Lawrence LeMay
lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
Tony Duell wrote:
> The ZX81 uses a 3.5mm jack socket (what you call a 'phone socket' across
> the Pond) for the power input. The tip is +ve and the sleeve is -ve.
Actually, in the States a "phone plug" or "phone jack" is 1/4" -- the kind
used in ancient telephone switchboards, hence the name. To make it more
interesting we also have "phono" (aka RCA) jacks and plugs, used for
connecting phonographs and their amplifiers. Do these connectors have
different names on your side?
Glen
0/0
I was just wondering if anyone knew anything about the IBM System/38, or had any software or books for it. Do y'all think it is collectable?
Thanks,
Owen
I'm still here
Changed ISP Sorry
New e-mail:
fauradon(a)mn.mediaone.net
new web:
http://people.mn.mediaone.net/fauradon
-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 2:22 PM
Subject: OT Paging for Fran?ois
>Sorry for using this medium - just I got no other idea
>left to contact him.
>
>Does anybody have a valid mail address, or other mean
>of contact for Francois ?
>Las known mail address: fauradon(a)pclink.com
>His web pages at http://www.pclink.com/fauradon/
>are still accessible.
>
>Thank you
>Hans
>
>--
>VCF Europa am 29./30. April 2000 in Muenchen
>http://www.vintage.org/vcfe
>http://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe
Hi,
I can't figure out what the heck these two Intersil chips are; one is a 6003
and the other is an 5110. Also, I have these qbus boards from Sky Computer
that I have no clue what they are; they're all quad height (assuming that
means they have four connectors). They are Skywar-Q-A-03, Skywar-Q-B-03, and
Skydpmem-Q-02.
Will J
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>There is a rack of mystery DEC equipment, lots of green G series
>boards, etc. At the top of the rack is an array of lights, and
>I found a plastic panel that obviously was supposed to be over those
>lights. I've taken a photo of the panel, hopefully someone can
>identify it for me. Other stuff in the rack is on wirewrap backplanes,
>and the flip chips are plugged in from the bottom, i'm guessing this
>stuff goes with the 8/L cpu. http://www-users.itlabs.umn.edu/~lemay/panel.jpg
Seeing as how there's 7 lights for track address bits on the panel
(implying up to 128 tracks) and there's a big sticker saying "DF:"
on the bottom, I'm going to hazard a guess that this is a status
panel for a RF08 or RF11 disk controller.
I'm leaning towards RF11, as the data width on the panel appears to be
16 bits. (Maybe the same panel was used on both the RF11 and RF08... I
dunno.)
The RF11 runs the RS11 fixed-head disk, 128 cylinders * 8 blocks per
cylinder for 1024 512-byte blocks in total. The capacity in
12-bit-word mode is likely different.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I just picked up a DEC PDP-8/L cpu unit, someone had already taken it out
of the rack for me. How can i determine if I have a complete cpu? most
of the cards are present, and there are 3 cables coming from the unit,
each with a centronics connector at the end.
There is a rack of mystery DEC equipment, lots of green G series
boards, etc. At the top of the rack is an array of lights, and
I found a plastic panel that obviously was supposed to be over those
lights. I've taken a photo of the panel, hopefully someone can
identify it for me. Other stuff in the rack is on wirewrap backplanes,
and the flip chips are plugged in from the bottom, i'm guessing this
stuff goes with the 8/L cpu. http://www-users.itlabs.umn.edu/~lemay/panel.jpg
We also grabbed the top half of a teletype 33 ASR for parts, and plan to
return with a truck tomorrow for a complete Teletype 33 ASR.
There is still a complete PDP 11/20 rack system, with dectape, decpack,
and possibly other stuff in addition to the cpu unit itself. My friend
will try to rescue this, if we can borrow a pickup truck.
Other stuff out on the loading dock includes a DecScope, 2 DecWriter II,
1 DecWriter III, 1 Decprinter. I've contacted the person who is discarding
this stuff, to see if anything else is available, such as manuals or
dectape. By the way, i'm not planning to take the printers I just mentioned,
I just dont have much storage space.
Since this is the first 8/L system I've seen in person, any help in
determining if i have a complete system would be appreciated. Also,
what are those 3 centronix connectors for (connections to expansion
units in that other rack maybe?) and how can I connect a terminal
or something to make this thing a bit more usable?
-Lawrence LeMay
lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
Hi all,
I spent my lunch break finishing the configuration for the mailing list
archives. Due to underwhelming popular vote, the email addresses of
posters have been xxx'd out; if you really want your email address to
appear with your messages in the archive, you'll have to append it to your
sig.
The URL to access the archives, at this moment, is:
http://www.retrobytes.org/classiccmp/
For the moment, it is a pretty plain setup. The archive is split into
separate pages of 75 messages each (my only complaint with other archives:
it takes *way* too long to load a 500k archive list every time!) and can
be viewed as sorted by date (default page), thread, and author.
Soon enough, I hope to add a search engine and better browsing
manager...though I don't know when I'll get the time. If anone on the list
is a Glimpse expert and has a little time, I'd be happy to set you up a
login account... :)
Enjoy!
Aaron
Hi all,
I know that Kevan posted that he's working on getting his archives back
up, but a question in the meantime...
I've been thinking of making a new archive of the list available at
retrobytes.org (starting with this month); any comments/concerns/advice?
Do I have to get anyone's explicit permission to do this?
Lastly, assuming I go through with this, would people prefer that I set
Mhonarc to obfuscate everyone's email addresses? The benefit, of course,
is that a spammer's address crawler couldn't pick up everyone's addresses
>from the page like they do on newsgroups; the drawback is that people
wouldn't be able to directly contact the authors.
If the general feeling is that you'd rather the addresses be hidden,
perhaps I could create two archives...one private for classiccmp list
members to search the archives *with* addresses, and one public with the
obfuscated addresses.
As usual, any imput at all would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Aaron
Interestingly enough, I ran across an Enigma machine at a hamfest
in MD. last year. The gentleman had it on a table amidst a bunch
of WWII radio gear. I did a doubletake when I saw it (I only recognized
it because I've seen the one in the Smithsonian). It was missing the
encoder wheels, and I seem to remember that he wanted somewhere around
$7K for it. I'm pretty certain he didn't sell it, and I haven't seen
it at any hamfests since, but perhaps he'll have it there again this year.
-al-
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hans Franke [mailto:Hans.Franke@mch20.sbs.de]
> Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 4:12 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: One of only 3 "enigma machine" stolen; A piece
> of ENIAC was
> up for auction.
>
>
>
> > >I see it as another sign of how serious our hobby is
> becoming. Its valued
> > >at 100,000 pounds! I wonder what it will fetch on ebay? ;-)
>
> > Also sounds a bit like an April Foolsday Prank (Saturday
> was the day of the
> > crime)
>
> > Hmmm. If ever on sale at Ebay be prepared to fork out
> another 100K pounds
> > for the shipping !
>
> Why ? Do they include an U-Boot ?
>
> ;)
> Hans
>
> --
> VCF Europa am 29./30. April 2000 in Muenchen
> http://www.vintage.org/vcfe
> http://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe
>
--- Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com> wrote:
> > >> > > So... does anyone out there have a Mac "null-modem" cable...
> >
> > How is this cable different fromAAAIcAAACIAAAAiQAA
> > AIoAAACLAAAAjAAAAI0AAACOAAAAjwAAAJAAAACRAAAAkgAAAJMAAACUAAAA
> > lQAAAJYAAACXAAAAmAAAAJkAAACaAAAAmwAAAJwAAACdAAAAngAAAJ8AAACg
> > AAAAoQAAAKIAAACjAAAApAAAAKUAAACmAAAAp
>
> Say what?!?
>
> -ethan
I don't know why this resurfaced (I didn't resend it myself), but since
it did, I can provide two follow-up comments on it...
1) The source of the garbage appears to be Yahoo Mail! corrupting
random messages in my inboxes. As stuff moves in, I sort it into
several categories. I'll read a message one minute, then when new
stuff comes in, a formerly legible message garbles in the middle and
the end is a message that I had previously deleted. I am now in the
process of emptying all of my archival messages from Yahoo before I
contact their tech support, lest their "helpful" and "qualified"
individuals wipe my mailboxes from the face of the earth in an attempt
to root out the cause of the corruption.
2) I did finally get a working cable for my QuickTake 150 and MacIIci.
Thanks to all who provided information and advice. It's not a great
camera, but for $35, it's a camera I've used before and it's better than
nothing.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
This now appears when you begin a purchase transaction on the Netpliance web
site.
By purchasing the i-opener you are agreeing to use the i-opener Internet
service. The fee is $21.95 a month and will be billed to your credit card
approximately 2 days after the i-opener is shipped to you.
i-opener Internet appliances shipped after March 20, 2000 can no longer be
reconfigured in the manner described in recent reports. Modification of the
i-opener in any way is in violation of our terms and conditions.
>From: Brian Roth <broth(a)heathers.stdio.com>
>Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: iOpener
>Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 22:29:30 -0500
>
>Its possible that they could goo the area with epoxy which will make it
>very
>difficult but not impossible to add the drive. I have seen other manu's do
>this as a quick fix until a more permanant solution can be
>engineered.(remember Videocipher?)
>
>I still have one ordered hoping the mod will still be possible.
>
>Brian.
>
>Megan wrote:
>
> > >OK, I got a 6.4 GB laptop drive hooked up and right now the iOpener is
> > >running DOS/BATCH V10-01A on an emulated PDP-11/40+RK05 system. I love
> > >it!!!
> >
> > >It's going to take some real butchery to get the case closed, but I
>guess
> > >that's to be expected. The low-profile 3M connector barely fit under
>the
> > >CPU heat sink w/o needing it to be clearanced, that was nice.
> >
> > >BTW the CPU seems to be 200 MHz, not 180 MHz. But it still gets only
> > >about 80 BogoMIPS, pretty slow.
> >
> > I heard last night that Netpliance is making modifications so that
>people
> > can no longer do this... they are apparently losing a LOT of money
>selling
> > the machines, having expected to recoup it in the service charges...
> >
> > Can someone confirm this... and maybe confirm the change that they
> > have done (which I understand is simply removal of the cable connector
> > for the drive).
> >
> > Oh, and supposedly back-ordered units will have the mod...
> >
> > Megan Gentry
> > Former RT-11 Developer
> >
> > +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
> > | Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
> > | Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
> > | Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
> > | 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
> > | Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
> > | (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
> > +--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>> Please feel free to say 'impossible' - my knowledge of electronics
> I was rather covering my own back when some clueful person points
> out that it is possible to make a GPIB interface using those chips
> (althoughI still can't see how ;-))
>> at this level is minimal.
> I wasn't trying to 'get at you' and I apologise if I gave that
> impression.
I didn't think you were 'getting at me'; looking back I should have
put a few :-) :-) in my reply!
> I am firstly trying to find out what all the options for the 380Z
> really were -- my machine is rather cut down, and contains :
> Z80 CPU (with 32K RAM)
> 40 column VDU
> RAM expansion (32K)
> Hires graphics
> Floppy controller
> Terminator
I'm going to have to dig my other 380Z out and record what's in that.
> Secondly I wanted to warn you against connected PET or HP
> peripherals here, as the results would probably not be good for
> either the 380Z or the peripheral.
I do have the standard PET IEEE peripherals, thanks for the warning.
> It would be interesting to figure out just what it does. Feel like
> a morning with the TTL databook and a continuity tester? :-).
When I get the time, I'll do this. I also thought I could scan or
photograph/scan the board and e-mail you a tiff/jpeg
Doug.
Just out of curiosity, is there still a chance of getting that piece of the
ENIAC?
-----Original Message-----
From: John Lewczyk <jlewczyk(a)his.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Sunday, April 02, 2000 11:36 PM
Subject: One of only 3 "enigma machine" stolen; A piece of ENIAC was up
forauction.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_698000/698804.stm
An Enigma machine used by the Nazis to send coded messages during World War
Two, has been stolen from the code-cracking Station X at Bletchley Park,
Buckinghamshire. The machine, worth about ?100,000, is one of only three in
the world. It was brought to the UK after the war.
I bet it was somebody on this list who grabbed it! Fess up! ;-)
I see it as another sign of how serious our hobby is becoming. Its valued
at 100,000 pounds! I wonder what it will fetch on ebay? ;-)
On the other hand, a piece of ENIAC from Eckert's estate was up for auction
this weekend in Philadelphia
(http://skinner.lycos.com/Scripts/ListingInfo.asp?LotNo=10083515&SiteCatNo=8
1397).
Opening bid was $4K, they expected it to go to $8-$12K US. They didn't get
a nibble! Go figure! I was rather tempted, but don't have that deep
pockets.
On Apr 2, 13:32, Aaron Christopher Finney wrote:
> I've been thinking of making a new archive of the list available at
> retrobytes.org (starting with this month); any comments/concerns/advice?
I think that's a good idea. I miss the archive.
> Lastly, assuming I go through with this, would people prefer that I set
> Mhonarc to obfuscate everyone's email addresses?
I'd prefer mine to be obscured in some way, though I don't mind if it's not
completely obliterated. If it prevents the more simplistic
address-gatherers from reading it, that would be sufficient as far as I'm
concerned.
> perhaps I could create two archives...one private for classiccmp list
> members to search the archives *with* addresses, and one public with the
> obfuscated addresses.
Sounds like a lot of extra storage :-) I'd just go for one, possibly with
munged addresses.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Just picked up one of these, was a pull from a 11/725 and
has a 4-pin plastic in-line plug in the back.
Don't have any docs for this. Can anyone provide the pinouts
for this power plug ?
-------
| O |<
| O |
| O |
| O |
-------
Thanks ............. Nick
>So what do you call the plug on a 'walkman' headphone? We'd call it a 3
>pole (or 'stereo') 3.5mm jack plug.
Here when it's not called 3.5mm, it's called 1/8th inch. And the 2.5mm
version is 3/32 inch.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927