2 Apr
2000
2 Apr
'00
1:27 p.m.
On Apr 2, 13:32, Aaron Christopher Finney wrote:
I've been thinking of making a new archive of the
list available at
retrobytes.org (starting with this month); any comments/concerns/advice?
I think that's a good idea. I miss the archive.
Lastly, assuming I go through with this, would people
prefer that I set
Mhonarc to obfuscate everyone's email addresses?
I'd prefer mine to be obscured in some way, though I don't mind if it's not
completely obliterated. If it prevents the more simplistic
address-gatherers from reading it, that would be sufficient as far as I'm
concerned.
perhaps I could create two archives...one private for
classiccmp list
members to search the archives *with* addresses, and one public with the
obfuscated addresses.
Sounds like a lot of extra storage :-) I'd just go for one, possibly with
munged addresses.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
2 Apr
2 Apr
7:57 p.m.
Please obscure my addy too. I've got enough dimwit spammers sending me mail.
On Apr 2, 13:32, Aaron Christopher Finney wrote:
--
Jim Strickland
jim(a)DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BeOS Powered!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've been thinking of making a new archive of
the list available at
retrobytes.org (starting with this month); any comments/concerns/advice?
I think that's a good idea. I miss the archive.
Lastly, assuming I go through with this, would
people prefer that I set
Mhonarc to obfuscate everyone's email addresses?
I'd prefer mine to be obscured in some way, though I don't mind if it's not
completely obliterated. If it prevents the more simplistic
address-gatherers from reading it, that would be sufficient as far as I'm
concerned.
perhaps I could create two archives...one private
for classiccmp list
members to search the archives *with* addresses, and one public with the
obfuscated addresses.
Sounds like a lot of extra storage :-) I'd just go for one, possibly with
munged addresses.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
3 Apr
3 Apr
1:29 a.m.
Lastly,
assuming I go through with this, would people prefer that I set
Mhonarc to obfuscate everyone's email addresses?
I'd prefer mine to be obscured in some way, though I don't mind if it's not
completely obliterated. If it prevents the more simplistic
address-gatherers from reading it, that would be sufficient as far as I'm
concerned.
8811
days inactive
8812
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
allisonp＠world.std.com -
jim＠calico.litterbox.com -
pete＠dunnington.u-net.com