I have an HP EISA network card (10BaseT + AUI), it came out of a 486/66ST
server. I believe the model # is 27248.
For trade (I'm looking for 41256-100 RAM) or free for cost o' shipping.
Gordon
Gordon Zaft
zaft(a)azstarnet.com
On Sep 7, 14:02, Mike Ford wrote:
> >It would have helped if the installers (before my time)
> >hadn't wire-tied the cat 5 runs to the nearest 110v A/C
> >lines... three-foot parallel runs, in fact...
>
> My house is done is untwisted bellwire, any kind of cat5 sounds like
> nirvana to me.
>
> CAT5 is shielded twisted pairs isn't it? Why would proximity to 60 hz ac
be
> a problem, or are the network cards just REALLY poorly designed
(rejection
> of common mode noise)?
Nope, Cat 5 is UTP -- UNshielded twisted pair. It has reasonable
common-mode rejection, but nothing is perfect. In long runs, such as you'd
find in a typical commercial building infrastructure, you'd notice quite a
difference if the UTP was too close to power cables. They're notoriously
noisy.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
Having got my Model III back together only to discover the CRT *has*
decompressed has anyone got a spare they'd like to sell?
This one is a 16K non-floppy model with a serial number less than 1400 so
I'd like to get it running again!
cheers folks,
--
adrian/witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - The online Computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - monthly Gothic shenanigans
It would have helped if the installers (before my time)
hadn't wire-tied the cat 5 runs to the nearest 110v A/C
lines... three-foot parallel runs, in fact...
and management refuses to believe we need to re-cable..
I was even threatened by my supervisor-at-the-time and
told not to bring it up again, as it would be a 5-digit
refit cost.
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Blakeman [mailto:rhblakeman@kih.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:53 AM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: RE: HP & Compaq
>
>
> Sounds like you need to think about using STP shielded
> cabling if you have
> that much noise on the LAN.
>
> -> -----Original Message-----
> -> From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> -> [mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of
> Douglas Quebbeman
> -> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:21 AM
> -> To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org'
> -> Subject: RE: HP & Compaq
> ->
> ->
> -> > > They BOUGHT it...BOUGHT != KILLED. Now Tulip chips have
> -> Intel logos
> -> > > on them. At least I'm pretty sure I've seen some...it may
> -> have been a
> -> > > nightmare or something. ;)
> -> >
> -> > Those el-cheapo Linksys cards that I like because the
> newer ones rarely
> -> > fail on me and when they do they are cheap to replace,
> are Tulip. And
> -> > they're faster because of it.
> ->
> -> I hope you don't mean the EtherFast 10/100 LNE100TX
> cards... they are
> -> *way* too sensitive to noisy LANs... I've had to pull
> several and replace
> -> them with either Intel Pro/100 adapters, or drop back to
> some old 3Com
> -> 3c509 10Mbps combo cards... Of course, YMMV, etc...
> ->
> -> -dq
> ->
>
Well, I'd only store them (for possible future use), if I get them. If
someone will actually use it, then it's thiers...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
! Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:18 PM
! To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org'
! Subject: RE: IBM DOS 3.0, MS-DOS 5.x etc
!
!
! On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, David Woyciesjes wrote:
! > Nevermind me taking them. Fred would put them to better
! use with his
! > students, as a history lesson ;-)
!
! I already have enough that nobody need hold back if they want them.
!
! --
! Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin(a)xenosoft.com
! <A HREF= "http://merritt.edu/~fcisin" >classes</A>
!
I was successful in upgrading my VAX 4000/300 to a /500. I had the
CPU but had to buy MS690 memory to replace my MS670. I also went
>from 96MB to 128M. Now to find a used /700A or /705A CPU to upgrade
further.
I was a little worried that my backplane was not of the right revision,
but the barcode part number matched that of a /500 and /400 at work, so
I wasn't too worried. I'd seen conflicting information when I searched
DejaNews^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HGoogleGoups, so I figured I'd better check. If
anyone else needs this information, the bardcode part number on all three
systems is 54-19354-01.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
! From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
!
! On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Chuck McManis wrote:
! > I've got some copies of DOS. I know, I know. Does anyone want them?
!
! If nobody else steps forward (or in it), I'll gladly take any
! copies of
! DOS. Besides my personal "collection", it is handy to have a
! lot of DOS
! manuals for various versions available for use by the students in my
! Microcomputer Operating Systems class.
Chuck ---
Nevermind me taking them. Fred would put them to better use with his
students, as a history lesson ;-)
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> So what I predict, is that in the near future (probably 1 to
> 2 but certainly less than 5 years) you will only see
> "computers" sold as either big-bad-ass servers, or small
> embeddedable controllers. The middle ground, the so called
> "Personal Computer" will cease to exist as a general purpose
> machine. And only the programmers will notice.
I don't think so- there is a significant market for a particular
form-factor of personal computer, the workstation, that just won't
go away. It's too small a niche market to justify the engineering
and production of a "CAD appliance" and too large to justify killing
the general purpose computer on which it's based.
Ditto for "Programming appliances", "research applicances", and so
on. These just won't come to be. Rather, the general purpose PC
will live on to fill those market niches.
Regards,
-dq
I've managed to push back the age of
the oldest computer user manual in my
collection by another 42 years.
SCREW PROPELLER COMPUTER
Geo. McDermott
52 pages, hardbound, first edition
Taylor and Carpenter, 1902
This book describes a mechanical computer
with two separate rotating discs to enter
variables and used to calculate the dimensions
and proportions of screw propellers
The last chapter is entitled "Directions
for operating the computer" with 7 example
problems.
Unfortunately there are no pictures of the
computer in the book so I'll have to wait
until the book attracts the computer. :)
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
! It would have helped if the installers (before my time)
! hadn't wire-tied the cat 5 runs to the nearest 110v A/C
! lines... three-foot parallel runs, in fact...
!
! and management refuses to believe we need to re-cable..
! I was even threatened by my supervisor-at-the-time and
! told not to bring it up again, as it would be a 5-digit
! refit cost.
Oooof, that bites. Knowing me, I probably would mention it again,
then once my boss reprimands me for it, I'd be up in HR (or the Big Boss)
getting him tossed for being a (insert adjective of choice) moron... it's
good he's gone now.
Time to pitch the re-wire job...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Chuck ---
If no one else wnats them to use, stick them in with my Trimm case
you're sneding. I'll keep them around, just in case!
Geez, it looks like I'm starting my own library/museum!
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Chuck McManis [mailto:cmcmanis@mcmanis.com]
! Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:18 AM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: IBM DOS 3.0, MS-DOS 5.x etc
!
!
! I've got some copies of DOS. I know, I know. Does anyone want them?
!
! I've got PC-DOS 3.0 in the original IBM slipcase
!
! I've got two copies of MS-DOS 5, one is still shrinkwrapped
!
! I think I have PC-DOS 3.2
!
! anyway they are available for postage or free if you come to
! sunnyvale to
! get them.
! --Chuck
!
Don't know how old Novell 3.11 is, so this might be offtopic - if so, my
apologies...
We're dumping the last remaining trash out of our old office. I came across
a (likely) complete manual set for novell 3.11/3.12. They are free for the
cost of shipping if anyone wants them.
If you want them, speak up before noon tomorrow or they're going into the
dumpster
Jay West
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > I hope you don't mean the EtherFast 10/100 LNE100TX cards... they are
> > *way* too sensitive to noisy LANs... I've had to pull several and replace
> > them with either Intel Pro/100 adapters, or drop back to some old 3Com
> > 3c509 10Mbps combo cards... Of course, YMMV, etc...
>
> Actually, I am referring specifically to the EtherFast 10/100 LNE100TX
> Revision four and higher cards. The older ones are garbage.
The box of 20 I bought last December has not served us well...
even though I believe our LAN is the weak point, at least the
Intel and 3Com cards don't crash the PC from effects of the
noise...
Regards,
-dq
On August 26, Wayne M. Smith wrote:
> I was looking inside my ProLog M-900 and noticed a gold and
> ceramic chip labeled "INS4004D" socketed next to two i4002s.
> Does anyone know if National Semi second sourced the i4004?
> It also has the number "530" on the bottom which I suppose
> is a lot no.
>
> For those with GUI browsers, here is the best I could do
> with my camera:
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~wmsmith/ProLog4004.jpg
Hmm, it sure looks like it!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
At 01:43 PM 9/6/01 -0700, McManis, Charles wrote:
>So what I predict, is that in the near future (probably 1 to 2 but certainly less than 5 years) you will only see "computers" sold as either big-bad-ass servers, or small embeddedable controllers. The middle ground, the so called "Personal Computer" will cease to exist as a general purpose machine. And only the programmers will notice.
With prices dropping so low, computers have become more
disposable. But even with the $200 Celeron 566 you can
buy today, it still has drive bays and memory slots and
IDE and USB I/O interfaces.
A vast part of the computer market is the selling of add-ons
and replacement components. How cheap will computers need
to be before you'll throw one away because the CD drive
stopped working?
Does commoditization necessary mean they'll no longer be
expandable, and that they'll be expendable? (Driving to the
office tonight, a very beat-up and rusty car very nearly
matched the speed of my 2001 model.) Does it mean people
won't want to buy replacement parts or upgrade options?
What might this mean for classic computers? In fifteen years,
some of them may be unbootable, as the ASP-like web services
they depended on have disappeared like so many dog-food-selling
dot-com ephemera sites.
To stretch the auto analogy, even in the smallest towns there
are still auto parts stores and repair shops and at the next
level, all the junk yards and parts dealers who fill the
needs of the repair stores.
With the surging wave of enthusiastic game-players who rapidly
drove the pace of graphics card development far beyond what
the earlier CAD and computer graphics market ever demanded,
has emerged a new class of computer owners who eagerly
upgrade, tweak, customize and polish their systems beyond all reason.
Just like car enthusiasts. :-)
- John
In response to my comment of:
>No doubt the auto industry had a very similar time of it and today
>cars are largely identical except for things like body styling and
>number of cup holders. So what used to be special and unique, is now
>common and mundane.
At 04:19 PM 9/6/2001 -0400, Jeff Hellige wrote:
> My only problem with that analogy is that automobiles are
>fairly fixed as to what you can use them for, while computers on the
>other hand are bounded only by the imagination and talent of the
>programmers.
Except that over 95% of "end user" computers purchased today are _not_ bought by programmers. And what non-programmers do with computers _is_ fixed, and as many on this list have complained it gets harder and harder every year to find enough information to actually program these things at a level deeper than Visual Basic script.
So what I predict, is that in the near future (probably 1 to 2 but certainly less than 5 years) you will only see "computers" sold as either big-bad-ass servers, or small embeddedable controllers. The middle ground, the so called "Personal Computer" will cease to exist as a general purpose machine. And only the programmers will notice.
--Chuck
> From: John Honniball <John.Honniball(a)uwe.ac.uk>
> > > > I am not sure that ancient analogue tape recorders
> > > > are on-topic :-)
> > While it is possible to use such machines to store programs from most
> > home computers, I don't think many people did.
>
> I did! I hooked up my Akai 4000DS reel-to-reel
> (transistor, not valve) to my Compukit UK101.
DS? I have a 4000D right here which I use to convert old tapes to CD-ROM
media. What's the difference between D and DS???
BTW the ZX81/TS1000 is extremely picky about tape recorders, and I have
never gotten one to work with a reel-to-reel deck. Any ideas why?
> Didn't one of the Elektor machines use 45s for software
> distribution? Wasn't there once a music CD with software
> on one track (for a Spectrum?)?
Actually it was a 45-rpm disk. The program was on one side and music was
on the other. The idea was to load the program into the Spectrum, then
flip the record and run the program and play the music at the same time.
There was some sort of way to sync the program to the music (or vice versa)
for a "multimedia experience."
Glen
0/0
> From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> As has been shown over and over, the masses put up with a lot
> of things that an individual would otherwise turn away from and
> refuse. It's kind of interesting to note that at this point, PC
> brand names mean very little and there's little to no brand loyalty.
> Makes sense since there is little difference from one to the other.
Unfortunately people new to PCs often regard name-brands highly when
shopping for their first computer, and they will often turn up their snouts
when they see my (very nice looking) white-box clones. I have also had
people tell me they didn't believe small shops actually built systems, but
that we bought them from some Asian factory (too "complex" to be produced
outside of an assembly line).
Glen
0/0
Hi folks,
I'm sure I read here that it was possible to boot a GS over an Appletalk
network; I've got a choice now - the ][GS 5 1/4" floppy drive I won in
January has finally turned up so I can either try and get GS/OS onto 5 1/4"
disks or I can boot GS/OS images from another Mac or something.....I'm
itching to get it running for the museum so any hints are appreciated....
cheers!
--
adrian/witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - The online Computer museum, now with its 3rd CBM
P500
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - monthly Gothic shenanigans
Rich ---
I have installers for OS 7.1.2, 7.5, 7.5.1, etc., up to 8.1, on my
Service Source CD. Let me know exactly which you're looking for.
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Rich Beaudry [mailto:r_beaudry@hotmail.com]
! Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:10 PM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Update on IIgs Computers
!
!
! To all who responded to my inquiry on IIgs computers,
!
! My apologies for the delay on this. I was delayed in getting
! the stuff, and
! put the last in my loft at 11:00pm last night!
!
! The quantity was certainly smaller than I was led to
! believe... One school
! had already dumped some stuff...
!
! Totals are as follows:
!
! IIgs CPUs: 25
! 3.5" floppies: 20+
! 5.25" floppies: 20+
! IIgs keyboards/cables: 20+
! IIgs Monitors: 12 (there are more left ... see below...)
! Imagewriter II w/ cable: 5
! Macintosh LCII w/ monitor/keyboard/mouse: 2
! IIgs mice: ???? (I didn't get an exact count, and I'm afraid
! I will be short
! quite a few)
! IIc CPUs w/ power supply: 2
!
! The only things left at the school are monitors. I have them
! on hold, so
! they won't be dumped, but there are at least 12 more IIgs
! monitors, and 2
! IIc color composite monitors. I didn't know how many people
! were interested
! in the monitors, however, because of shipping costs.
!
! I will begin testing, but I don't expect to get done before
! the end of the
! weekend (I do have a life! :-P). I will let you know further
! what exactly
! is in each IIgs, any cards, ROM versions, etc. at that time.
! I will also
! have exact counts on how many "complete" systems I can build.
!
! There was one near-mint Woz w/ a memory card, but I'm keeping
! that one :-)
!
! Since I am keeping a IIgs, and also one of the LC IIs (there
! were three, but
! I deducted my keeper from the list above), I am looking for a
! set of working
! IIgs System Software (6.0.1, I think? Or maybe 6.1??)
! diskettes, and a set
! of working MacOS System 7.5 diskettes. We can work a deal if
! you would
! like, and the diskettes do NOT have to be originals (no legal
! issues, as
! Apple has these for download.... I'm not an Apple expert,
! however, so I'd
! rather get already-working disk sets...)
!
! Unless you have diskettes for me, please do NOT reply to this
! message. I
! will post again when I have completed testing all of the
! hardware. At that
! time, I will ask for who is interested in what, and where we go from
! there....
!
! Also, apologies for mentioning the LC II ... OT until next
! year, I think :-)
!
! Thanks!
!
! Rich B.
!
Jeff Hellige originally wrote:
> As has been shown over and over, the masses put up with a lot
> of things that an individual would otherwise turn away from and
> refuse. It's kind of interesting to note that at this point, PC
> brand names mean very little and there's little to no brand loyalty.
> Makes sense since there is little difference from one to the other.
This is why collecting classic computers and preserving them is so important.
Interestingly, people who were different in the early PC days were punished severely from not being "100% PC Compatible" Many on this list remember the famous question, "But does is run MS Flight Simulator?" Which was one of the standard compatibility tests.
As for brand names, I think they will come more and more to mean _everything_. After all it has happened with cars it will happen with computers. 21st century personal computers are rapidly converging on a relatively fixed function, internet access unit with data composition and retrieval capabilities.
No doubt the auto industry had a very similar time of it and today cars are largely identical except for things like body styling and number of cup holders. So what used to be special and unique, is now common and mundane.
--Chuck
To all who responded to my inquiry on IIgs computers,
My apologies for the delay on this. I was delayed in getting the stuff, and
put the last in my loft at 11:00pm last night!
The quantity was certainly smaller than I was led to believe... One school
had already dumped some stuff...
Totals are as follows:
IIgs CPUs: 25
3.5" floppies: 20+
5.25" floppies: 20+
IIgs keyboards/cables: 20+
IIgs Monitors: 12 (there are more left ... see below...)
Imagewriter II w/ cable: 5
Macintosh LCII w/ monitor/keyboard/mouse: 2
IIgs mice: ???? (I didn't get an exact count, and I'm afraid I will be short
quite a few)
IIc CPUs w/ power supply: 2
The only things left at the school are monitors. I have them on hold, so
they won't be dumped, but there are at least 12 more IIgs monitors, and 2
IIc color composite monitors. I didn't know how many people were interested
in the monitors, however, because of shipping costs.
I will begin testing, but I don't expect to get done before the end of the
weekend (I do have a life! :-P). I will let you know further what exactly
is in each IIgs, any cards, ROM versions, etc. at that time. I will also
have exact counts on how many "complete" systems I can build.
There was one near-mint Woz w/ a memory card, but I'm keeping that one :-)
Since I am keeping a IIgs, and also one of the LC IIs (there were three, but
I deducted my keeper from the list above), I am looking for a set of working
IIgs System Software (6.0.1, I think? Or maybe 6.1??) diskettes, and a set
of working MacOS System 7.5 diskettes. We can work a deal if you would
like, and the diskettes do NOT have to be originals (no legal issues, as
Apple has these for download.... I'm not an Apple expert, however, so I'd
rather get already-working disk sets...)
Unless you have diskettes for me, please do NOT reply to this message. I
will post again when I have completed testing all of the hardware. At that
time, I will ask for who is interested in what, and where we go from
there....
Also, apologies for mentioning the LC II ... OT until next year, I think :-)
Thanks!
Rich B.
Off-topic, at least as much as an HP/Compaq merger...
I picked up a pair of Compaq ProLiant 7000 servers at a
great price. Up to four PPro 200s, 12 sleds, rack mount.
They've been scrubbed and I need any version of the
Compaq SmartStart CDs that'll let me reboot and reconfigure
the systems to see how well they work.
These CDs are $50 on eBay, but that's probably people selling
their old sets. I'm hoping someone here will have an old set
they might be willing to donate or trade...
- John
Until I get my hands on a copy of the venerable "Beneath Apple Dos"
is there anyone who can point me to an online resource describing the
Apple ][ disk controller P6 ROM state machine? The exact uses
for the Q6 and Q7 switches ($C0EC-$C0EF)? Or would be willing to
summarize from the mighty tome for me?
Sorry to bungie post (I'm a brand new list member as of right now),
it's not my normal habit, but web searches are failing me for this
particular info. The nearest I've found [1] is a bit too cryptic
without supplementary descriptions.
Cheers,
- Sean, Apple //e (enhanced) owner
[1] http://www.cs.umu.se/~christer/Apple/
--
Sean Gugler ("Dr. Guz") guz(a)doctor.com
"This quote's just six words long."
John:
I may have a version of the 3.2 SmartStart at home. If you can't get
one, let me know.
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
-----Original Message-----
From: John Foust [mailto:jfoust@threedee.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:15 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: OT: Compaq SmartStart CDs?
Off-topic, at least as much as an HP/Compaq merger...
I picked up a pair of Compaq ProLiant 7000 servers at a
great price. Up to four PPro 200s, 12 sleds, rack mount.
They've been scrubbed and I need any version of the
Compaq SmartStart CDs that'll let me reboot and reconfigure
the systems to see how well they work.
These CDs are $50 on eBay, but that's probably people selling
their old sets. I'm hoping someone here will have an old set
they might be willing to donate or trade...
- John
You need interface cards for the b&w HP Sacnjets flatbed? I might
have one in my basement, with the two HP Scanjets. I'll have to look
tonight...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Robert Byrnes [mailto:rbyrnes@pacbell.net]
! Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:00 PM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Re: find... help
!
!
! I saw your message from 1998 about Scanjet interface cards
! and wonder if
! you still have them. If so which cards and how much?
! Bob Byrnes
!
I don't know if anyone caught this but I did an interview on the Todd
Mundt show about a week or so ago:
Here is the Real Audio archive:
http://www.toddshow.org/ram/tmshow0905.ram
My interview starts at about the 28 minute mark.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
> From: Russ Blakeman <rhblakeman(a)kih.net>
> I wonder if HP will absorb Compaq and totally do away with them or still
run
> them as an independantly named subsidiary.
PC-wise, I hope they just sort of do away with each other. IMHO, the
current HP and Compaq lines represent the lowest point in mass-produced
boxes. As bad as E-Machines and Packard Bells. Additionally, obtaining
the drivers (when the customer has lost the restore disk) can be
impossible, and when it *is* possible I'm often looking at a 15 MB download
for the video and 11 MB more for sound.
This is grotesque -- crappy, proprietary hardware running bloated software.
It's a wonder people put up with it. Perhaps they won't anymore.
Glen
0/0
Extraneous uses of computers systems.
In the same vein somewhere between 1974-1976 one of our systems guys used to
backup the RP04's on our PDP11/50 to 9-track tape. He would go to sleep on
a mat next to the system. When the backup finished he would then run a
program that would perform a series of head seeks that resulted in a shaking
of the drive and the floor next to the drive. Very expensive alarm clock.
Mike
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
> > They BOUGHT it...BOUGHT != KILLED. Now Tulip chips have Intel logos
> > on them. At least I'm pretty sure I've seen some...it may have been a
> > nightmare or something. ;)
>
> Those el-cheapo Linksys cards that I like because the newer ones rarely
> fail on me and when they do they are cheap to replace, are Tulip. And
> they're faster because of it.
I hope you don't mean the EtherFast 10/100 LNE100TX cards... they are
*way* too sensitive to noisy LANs... I've had to pull several and replace
them with either Intel Pro/100 adapters, or drop back to some old 3Com
3c509 10Mbps combo cards... Of course, YMMV, etc...
-dq
Hi Everyone...I recently inherited a PenMate Tablet made by Mouse Systems and would like to know if anyone can email me a copy of the driver floppy which came with it and or even tell me the voltage since it is missing the driver floppy and power adaptor! :-) Thanks in advance!
-Percy
> From: Adrian Vickers <avickers(a)solutionengineers.com>
> No, a pair of ZX81 kits went through recently (although a search no
longer
> shows them, irritatingly) for daft money. OTOH, when a built one can
fetch
> ?200+.... I suspect that was just a mad bidder moment however.
Hmm. I guess this means I'm rich ;>) I have a ton of this stuff here, and
have not been watching Ebay enough.
> I wonder if Zebra do a bulk discount; it strikes me that one could buy a
> load, then sell them in the UK for easy money...
Someone already bought a bunch and brought them into the UK but by the time
he paid the freight and customs he had to sell the kits for UKP 90. I'm
not sure how he made out on the deal . . . also, the ZX81/Spectrum crowd in
the UK would never pay this sort of money. Check comp.sys.sinclair.
Glen
0/0
I have a lead on an unbuilt Heathkit H-89 computer that is still in the
original
shipping carton (the smaller boxes inside are still factory sealed), along
with
two CRTs. I know Tony would recommend I buy it and build it, but what would
a fair price be for such an item?
A bit off-topic, but I'm also looking for Heathkit manuals for the IC-2008A
(desk calculator), GC-1005 (digital clock), and ID-1390A (digital
thermometer).
I recently acquired each of these devices but they're all showing erratic
behavior of one sort or another. Any ideas where to find these manuals,
preferably cheaply? I've found w7fg's web site, but are there other sources?
Cheers,
Dan
http://www.decodesystems.com/wanted.html
> From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
> I could be mistaken about this, but IIRC, a risky bet, but ... wasn't the
ZX80 a
> <$50 proposition back in the '80's and the '81 slightly less, on the
order of
> $29.95?
The ZX80 kits originally sold for 199 British Pounds in 1980 (about US$400
at that time). The ZX81 was advertised in Scientific American in 1981 for
$99 (the assembled version was $149). By '84 the ZX80s were pretty much
gone and the '81s were at the $29.95 level you mention.
Glen
0/0
> From: Louis Schulman <louiss(a)gate.net>
> I assume this is on for Saturday, September 15, as previously announced.
Have announcements been
> placed in the appropriate usenet groups? We certainly want to let all
those who might be interested know
> about this get together!
Louis, the CFCJF is absolutely on! I have posted notices in about a dozen
usenet groups and have had a few inquiries. As always, the more the
merrier so if you know some places where you can spread the word please do
so. We might not have a big crowd the first time, but if everyone has fun
and word gets out we might be able to do this once or twice every year.
See ya there!
Glen
0/0
Louis,
Welcome aboard.
Joe's and several other collectors are in Orlando. I live in the Ft.
Lauderdale area but will be in Orlando that weekend. Once we get a little
feedback, we'll set a time and place.
Is Saturday September 8th OK for you?
Steverob
>From: "Louis Schulman" <louiss(a)gate.net>
>Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>To: "classiccmp-classiccmp.org" <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>, "joe"
><rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
>CC: "Glenatacme-aol.com" <Glenatacme(a)aol.com>,
>"musicman38-mindspring.com" <musicman38(a)mindspring.com>
>Subject: Re: Central Florida Computer Junk Fest !
>Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT)
>
>Hey! I am in Tampa! My wife says: You have way too much computer
>junk! Get rid of it!
>
>So, count me in! You guys are in Orlando?
>
>Louis Schulman
>
>On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 09:15:11 -0400, joe wrote:
>
>#
># Steve Robertson said "Why don't you send out an invitation to the
>#"Central Florida Computer Junk Fest".
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> At the last TRW swapmeet in So. Cal, I picked up a couple of Atari
> XE130's for $5 each. The seller said he had pulled them out of a
> school computer lab. No power supplies, but a quick trip to Ebay fixed
> that...
Haha, I bet you ended up paying twice that for the PSU's. ^_^
> So I connect one of them to my TV, and flip on the power switch. The
> console LED turned on, and the TV screen went black. That's it.
> Uh-oh...
Houston.....
> Well, we have another one to try. So I connect it, and it boots into
> Atari Basic. Much better. I did a quick hello-world type basic
> program. Welcome to the world of Atari.
> So, is the other one fixable?
http://www.tomheroes.com/atari_repair.htm
No, really, the first thing you ought to do is open it up and make
sure there aren't any burnt up or leaking caps, or other visible signs
of damage to the board. Then, swap any socketed chips you find with
the 'good' ones from the other machine. Be sure to swap them back
individually after testing, nothing worse than complicating an already
complicated problem. I don't know if the Atari kit has any trouble
chips like the PLA in the C64. I have two 130XE's myself that I've
never had any problems with. If there aren't any socketed chips,
an easy chip test is to power the machine up, wait about 30 seconds,
and put your finger on the top of each of the "big" chips. If any one
of them is already hot, it's probably shorted and a good candidate for
socketing and swapping. Test the RAM chips in the same way, with your
finger or other heat-sensitive probe.
Good luck, let us know what you come up with.
-----
> From: Adrian Vickers <avickers(a)solutionengineers.com>
> eBay suggests that unbuilt ZX81s are worth silly money (think ?300 ($450)
> upwards).
Maybe you're thinking of unbuilt ZX80 kits?? Zebra still sells the ZX81
kits for USD 99.95, which is high. I've seen them go for $50 on ebay
recently. The North American ZX81 kits are not at all rare.
Glen
0/0
> Forwarded for those that may not get the Encompass newsletter
> and who might be interested in their plans.
>
> Jeff
Another follow up.
>
>
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,alt.folklore.computers
> Subject: HP Compaq merger, here we go again.
> Summary: Y W8 4 HP
> Followup-To:
> Distribution:
> Organization: Lakewood MicroSystems
> Keywords:
> Cc:
My wife just handed me a pair of Unix Expo Digital Equipment key chains.
Don't know if I ought to EBay 'em for quick cash. Maybe a PII or PIII
for my new motherboard.
The logo d|i|gi|t|a|l in maroon (yeah it's the reworked logo not the
good old blue and white). The standard green UNIX license plate and Live Free
Or Die. (New Hampshire)
The other side a California (The Migration State) plate with the letters
Y W8 4 HP.
Damned if this wasn't prescient. Why Wait For HP --- cause Palmer,
Pfeifer, Capellas and Compaq made a big mess of it. I'm not sure Carly
will do any better. My judgement on Lucent/AT&T managers is they
aren't much better than Compaq's whiz types.
Bill Pechter
Ex DEC, Ex-Concurrent, Ex-Alliant, Ex-IBM, recently Ex Lucent,
Proabably Ex-Computer Hardware Industry for life
Digital Had It Then, Don't you wish you could still buy it NOW!
--
Bill Gates is a Persian cat and a monocle away from being a
villain in a James Bond movie -- Dennis Miller
bpechter@shell.monmouth.com|pechter@pechter.dyndns.org
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, r. 'bear' stricklin wrote:
> > IBM S/390 G1
> > IBM Shark RAMAC 2TB DASD Server
> > SGI Onyx RealityEngine2
> > SGI IrisVision Microchannel (!)
> >
> > Plus I got to hang out with Dave McGuire, Brian Hechinger, Brian's
> > daughter Avalon, Jeff Hellige, and a bunch of other random cool people.
> >
> > Pretty good week, I think.
>
> Holy schultz! I should say so! <seethes>
>
> How'd you manage that?
Well, I spent a crapload of money, and I am driving down to Florida this
weekend. 8-) It's ALL going to be worth it. Oh yes, it is. *evil grin*
Peace... Sridhar
Forwarded for those that may not get the Encompass newsletter
and who might be interested in their plans.
Jeff
>Status: U
>From: Encompass <Encompass(a)SBA.COM>
>To: "'jhellige(a)earthlink.net'" <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
>Subject: Encompass' Update on HP-Compaq Merger
>Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:08:04 -0500
>
>
>
>
>Dear Jeff
>
>It is with confidence that I write to assure you of Encompass'continued
>commitment to serve the needs of our membership in the wake of the announced
>merger of Compaq with Hewlett-Packard. Through our strong partnership with
>Compaq, Encompass is uniquely positioned to be your advocate on the Itanium
>Platform conversion and to work closely with Compaq's senior management team
>as plans regarding this proposed union unfold.
>
>For those who remember the acquisition of Digital by Compaq, these recent
>events must seem like deja vu. But while times have changed, our commitment
>to deliver forthright information as quickly as possible has not. We are
>poised and ready to offer Hewlett-Packard and Compaq recommendations on how
>to make the merger beneficial for you, a valuable segment of their existing,
>installed customer base.
>
>Should the merger become realized it would create a new global technology
>leader and untold opportunities for Encompass, our Enterprise Computing
>Association. Compaq's recent decision to migrate all enterprise level
>systems to IPF, coupled with Hewlett-Packard's standing commitment to the
>platform will position the newly-formed powerhouse to drive IPF as the "next
>core platform" for IT. As such, this will ultimately provide us, the
>end-customers of the new company with new levels of stability and
>application/solution availability more so than ever before.
>
>We originally banded together forty years ago as users of Digital Equipment
>Corporation computers and then a year ago had the foresight to evolve into
>Encompass, an Enterprise Computing Association. Our ability to adapt to the
>ever-changing conditions of the information technology industry is one of
>the core reasons that our organization has remained vital for so long. Now
>as Encompass, it is our mission to help you and your organization be more
>successful by providing an open, objective knowledge exchange network. While
>the players may change, our guiding principle of meeting your needs remains
>unaffected.
>
>Encompass will work tirelessly to share your concerns with Compaq and
>Hewlett-Packard, to provide on-going information about how this merger may
>affect you, and to make this newest transition successful for all of us. We
>appreciate your continued support in these revolutionary times.
>
>Sincerely,
>Joe Pollizzi
>President
>Encompass
--
Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
http://www.cchaven.comhttp://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
*Sorry about the off-topic multiple-posting, but I'm hoping you guys
can help me out here; off list, of course! I hate to have hardware sit
unused...
I have here a pair of EV4 21064 200MHz CPUs, p/n 21-35023-21. One
was
>from an AlphaStation 200 4/100, (dead power supply, m/b seems to be dead),
apparently an upgrade...
I was wondering if there is a dual-processor motherboard I could use
these on (and where to find one), or what other machines I could use them
in...
In my DEC3000 System Programmer's Reference, it says the DEC
3000/500X uses the 200MHz 21064. I assume this is the same (as I have
above). If so, I could bump my 3000/400 from 133 MHz to 200MHz, right?
Thanks in advance for any info...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Jumping in late, I know, but when I was at Georgia Tech (mid- to late-80s),
we were taught x86 assembly. There was a real focus on the concept that
"look folks, there's an awful lot going on under the hood that you might
want to be aware of when you write that Pascal (or C, or Lisp, or whatever)
program and the details matter". For that lesson, x86 asm is a pretty good,
if painful, object lesson. Much of GaTech was like that.
Oh, yeah...and we learned Modula-2 from Kim Kings book for undergrad OS.
Ken
Hi folks,
Brian Knittel and I have acquired a Kennedy vacuum-column tape drive
(along with a VAX 11/750 and some other goodies), which he is right this
minute driving up from San Jose. He tells me that the tape drive is on
rails and rack-mounted, and that the way to remove it from the rack is not
obvious. (He can see a latch that prevents the drive from sliding farther
into the rack, but not the one that is preventing it from sliding out.)
Can anyone tell us how to get it out? This will make it much easier to
get out of the rent-a-truck and up the stairs.
Thanks!
Norm Aleks
On September 5, jpero(a)sympatico.ca wrote:
> > > What Intel got from DEC was a FAB, and in some manner the StrongARM
> > > processor (I never have understood this one).
> >
> > And the Tulip chips, and the PCI bridges, and all the other cool DEC
> > chips that we've been using for years...
>
> Boooooooo!!! I love those tulip chipsets...low CPU use,
> ultra-reliable and well-supported by linux.
>
> Is there's ones still in production or what is another equally GOOD
> one that replaces tulip based NICs?
They BOUGHT it...BOUGHT != KILLED. Now Tulip chips have Intel logos
on them. At least I'm pretty sure I've seen some...it may have been a
nightmare or something. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On September 5, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> >I'm referring to the Itanium; not sure if Intel got that from DEC or not.
>
> They most certainly did not! Itanium is the marketing name for what was
> called Merced for many years. It's been in development since something
> like the early 90's.
>
> What Intel got from DEC was a FAB, and in some manner the StrongARM
> processor (I never have understood this one).
And the Tulip chips, and the PCI bridges, and all the other cool DEC
chips that we've been using for years...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
Well thanks to Doug Taylor who lent me one, thanks to Zane who tried
Acrobat 5.0, the users guide for the DRV11-WA is now online as a PDF file
at the House of VAX. The specific URL is
<http://www.mcmanis.com/chuck/computers/vaxen/boards.htm> (click on the
link for the DRV11-WA. Now to get the Dilog manuals up.
--Chuck
Hi all,
If you're wondering why I've gone quite on the 8032SK front, it's because
I'm busy digesting lots of digital electronics books :) I'm surprised at
how much I still remember from my school/polytech days - not to mention how
much I've forgotten! And why is it two's complement seems so easy now,
wheras it used to be so difficult? Weird...
Anyway, another PET related question: I've got 4 of the things now, and all
of them suffer from wobbly screens to some extent; the oldest (PET 2001) is
the least affected somehow....
Aside: Tony mentioned this is probably the electrolytic(s) drying up, and
that I should get an ESR meter (good idea, now that I know what one does);
I think I'll get a kit one - more soldering practice :). Hmm. Back to the
question...
Each PET has a huge electrolytic next to the transformer marked "23000mF".
Even given the can size, I assume they mean micro-F as opposed to milli-F;
but 23000uF seems to be impossible to get, should I replace with a 22000uF
or a 33000uF, both of which are readily available?
Also, do other non-electrolytic caps degrade - if so, would it be worth
replacing *all* the caps on old kit like this? Even so, is it worth
replacing all the electrolytic caps as a precaution, or should I just wait
impatiently for the ESR meter and only replace the suspect ones?
And finally: I bought a "Tip tinner/cleaner" block, and now my soldering
iron works a treat!
Thanks guys, for rekindling my latent interest in "real" electronics!
Cheers!
Ade.
--
B-Racing: B where it's at :-)
http://www.b-racing.co.uk
Anyone interested in one of these? I've got one that I'd like to trade for
something interesting. Ideally, I'm interested in a keyboard and mouse for a
Symbolics 3645 Lisp Machine. The AS/400 is in southern NH and I'd rather not
have to pack it up for shipping. Come by and pick it up if you want it.
Also, as I don't have a twinax terminal controller or terminal, I have no
way of testing this machine. The people who gave it to me say it worked the
last time they used it but I have no way of verifying that.
Hello Eric,
> I remember a couple of months ago there was discussion on
> the proper cable for a BA440 power supply (normal North
> American three prong power cord but with a notch where it
> plugs in to the power supply). Was there a consensus on
> the designation (and any place in the US that sell them)?
>From the sound of this, it might be like the power cords needed
for our DEC Alpha AXP 3000 -500 and -800 They also needed
a standard ISO computer power cord BUT with a notch or groove
in it, that isn't in the standard ISO computer power cord, for the
connection in the back of the machine. Luckily though, with the Alphas,
underneath in front of the machine, where the power came from the back
of the machine to where it actually plugs into the power supply, a
non-notched cord could be plugged in. Then eventually we finally came
up with one of the notched cords. But, before you ask, we can't spare
our
one and only.
Jan
If you had the opportunity to write a classic computer related phrase
(or whatever will work) on a 2.25" diameter button, what would you like
to wear?
Of course some of the classics are:
////////////
BYTE ME!
////////////
DANCE
ALGORITHM 1.0
0A ASL ;SHIFT TO
THE LEFT!
4A LSR ;SHIFT TO
THE RIGHT!
48 PHA ;PUSH A!
68 PLA ;PULL A!
EA NOP ;BYTE!
EA NOP ;BYTE!
EA NOP ;BYTE!
////////////
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
(this one is a bit harsh, I'd prefer to use a different phrase)
//////////////
My other computer is an Apple I
//////////////
My computer
takes up half a room
draws 500 watts,
has 4k of RAM,
and runs at only 500khz...
Beat That!
////////////////
reason: I have a bag of old buttons I am relabling (sticking new labels
over the previous 1996 dated event designs) to give away at VCF 5.0,
besides the Commodore related ones (of course) and those above, I am
open to do other designs (I have already did a nice "I'd rather be
playing Spacewar" in button form). Just let me know, I have about
60-100 buttons I'm doing. (color and photos are doable, fonts too if I
have em.)
--
01000011 01001111 01001101 01001101 01001111 01000100 01001111 01010010 01000101
Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (209) 754-1363
300-14.4k bps
Classic Commodore pages at: http://www.jps.net/foxnhare/commodore.html
01000011 01001111 01001101 01010000 01010101 01010100 01000101 01010010 01010011
At 06:40 AM 9/5/01 -0500, Paul Thompson wrote:
>I find myself in Madison WI for the next couple of days...
>I recall someone mentioned the UW surplus shop as a good spot for classic
>hardware...does anyone know its hours and location?
Open to the public on Fridays and sometimes Saturday:
http://www.bussvc.wisc.edu/swap/swap.html
Unless you're there at 7:50 AM on Friday, you won't get the
stuff that anone else might want.
- John
I find myself in Madison WI for the next couple of days...
I recall someone mentioned the UW surplus shop as a good spot for classic
hardware...does anyone know its hours and location?
--
On Sep 5, 1:44, Adrian Vickers wrote:
> Anyway, another PET related question: I've got 4 of the things now, and
all
> of them suffer from wobbly screens to some extent; the oldest (PET 2001)
is
> the least affected somehow....
> Each PET has a huge electrolytic next to the transformer marked
"23000mF".
> Even given the can size, I assume they mean micro-F as opposed to
milli-F;
> but 23000uF seems to be impossible to get, should I replace with a
22000uF
> or a 33000uF, both of which are readily available?
Given that the tolerance on electrolytics is often -20% +50%, I'd say the
22000?F should be fine. It's a reservoir/smoothing capacitor, so 33000?F
would also be good.
> Also, do other non-electrolytic caps degrade - if so, would it be worth
> replacing *all* the caps on old kit like this?
The others won't fail the way electrolytics do. As to the electrolytics,
many are probably OK and I'd not replace any apart than the ones I thought
were faulty. I might replace a whole batch in an old switch-mode PSU if
one was failing, because experience suggests that in tightly-packed units,
with several caps clustered together, more than one starts to go at around
the same time. Especially in SMPSUs that get hot.
> And finally: I bought a "Tip tinner/cleaner" block, and now my soldering
> iron works a treat!
One of those little round BIB cleaners? Great!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
A person I know, from which I've gotten 2 of these and others on the have
gotten up to 2 dozen each, has 2 left. You have to contact him ASAP and he
can tell you pricing and postage. His name is Chris Grenier and his email
address is: wiseash2000(a)yahoo.com
Contact him DIRECT as he does NOT do newsgroups or mailing lists
From: Jeffrey S. Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
>First, let's talk about fluids. It's been a while since I took a
>chemistry class. Questions:
>
>* Is there no difference between 'isopropanol', 'isopropyl alcohol', and
> 'propan-2-ol'?
I supect local naming conventions for Isopropanol Alcohol.
>* Are there any better fluids (methanol?) for certain situations?
Methanol is to be avoided, very flamable.
>* Can I find these at a hardware store?
Yes.
>* Is there anything I should look out for when using those fluids? That
> is, is there anything (glue?) they can damage?
Yes!!! Glues vary is solvency and solvents used so any one can
be problmatic.
MOST ALL are FLAMABLE.
Many of the older (gray silicon plastic packages) are more liable to
damage
by agressive solvents. Water is the safest, generally.
>My most important question deals with core stacks. Most of the board
.......
>(0) Leave the two board assembleds; disassembly would likely cause
> breakage.
Should not if done with care.
>(1) Blow canned air over the assembly and through the inter-board space.
NO! the pressure could beak those fragile wires.
>(2) Dip and swish the assembly in isopropyl alcohol.
Likely ok, with great care to avoid putting mechanical forces on the
core wires.
>(3) Blow air over the boards with an unheated hair dryer or more canned
> air.
NO.. NO, NOOOOOOOO! canned air can be high pressure and Blowdryer
is a risk for FIRE. Isopropanol is flammable and both the motor(brushes)
and the heater are risk for sparks.
Cleaning core is difficult due to the great fragility and the problem
that
the solder points for the wires can be weaker than the wire due to
corrosion {possible environmental} and the stripping methods that may
have been used to remove the insulating coating. More often than not
the actual core mat is a cleaner location with plastic covers and the
like. The latter suggests disassembly of the core stack to observe
the condition and cleanliness as compared to the external boards
(drivers and sense amps).
Use care.
Allison
At 02:44 PM 9/4/01 -0400, you wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Carlos Murillo wrote:
>
>> HP needed better production technology than what they had in
>> order for their new chip design to stick. The choices were DEC,
>> Intel and IBM. Guess what happened.
>
>IBM is doing the multi-layer ceramic interconnect packaging for the
>Itanium.
IBM was a latecomer in the alliance. At the time this was agreed,
DEC's Alpha outclocked all other mass-production cpus, but Intel
was outspending everyone in production technology research.
IA64 is the result of a chain of decisions that started a long
time ago.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez carlos_murillo(a)nospammers.ieee.org
> From: Cini, Richard <RCini(a)congressfinancial.com>
> I'm wondering, without creating flame bait, the pros and cons of
> keeping a computer kit versus assembling it?
>
> I have an unbuilt Sinclair ZX81 kit that I'm toying with assembling.
Build the ZX81 kit! I've done three of them and they're easy and fun (if
your soldering skills are good).
If you're planning on using the ZX81, remember: you don't *have* to build
it into its case (with its "unique" keyboard) and you can also leave the RF
modulator out and make an easy modification to provide high-quality video
to a modern TV with composite video in. It's also easy to increase the
onboard RAM from 1KB to 32KB. You wind up with a pretty fair Z80 system
with a decent BASIC, crisp video, access to the Z80 via the expansion port,
and adequate memory.
Let us know what you do!
Glen
0/0
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>The last time I remember DEC inventing anything fairly current was when
they
>came up with the VAX. That was 25 years ago. Everything they sold was
the
>OLDEST technology they could get and still foist of on the unwary buyer.
They'd
>NEVER have used anything as up-to-date as what Intel pushes, not that
it's the
>latest-greatest.
By time it's available for hobbiests maybe. Most of the stable products
were ahead
of the pack, they had to be the pack was hungry and chasing!
Lessee, Alpha, remember the 64 bit cpu that was what 10 years ahead of
Itainium
and the slow parts were maybe 2 times the speed of the fastest intel part
running intel
emulation.
DLT quantums flagship tape backup... formally a DEC patent and was the
TK50
back in the mid 80s when the competition was DC600 and 9080 carts.
The RZ series of 3.5" drives were connor electonics but the HDA were DEC
technology and design. Those SCSI drives were right on the front edge of
SCSI standards that were still emerging. Oh and they were fast as well
for their time.
Beware the comment that sounds like allways and never, rarely are things
really that way.
DEC was one of the leaders, while they were selling PDP-8s in the
form of DECmates and PDP-11s to people that didnt want or need VAXen.
Even those "old" systems were sometimes more modern than the PCs
of the moment. If anything else they were more likely to be to be found
in use or at least working in the early 21st century.
Allison
After swallowing DEC, I'm glad to see COMPAQ get swallowed.
But my opinion of Hewlett-Backward isn't what it used to be,
and I don't think we'll be buying anymore DeskJam printers
or DesignJam plotters, as they are no longer honoring the
terms of the service contracts they sold us.
Any escalating replies should be mailed to me privately...
Regards,
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Hellige [mailto:jhellige@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:35 AM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: HP & Compaq
>
>
> So what's everyone think about the newest merger, between HP
> and Compaq?
>
> Jeff
> --
> Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
> http://www.cchaven.com
> http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
>
> Which technology was that???
>
> The last time I remember DEC inventing anything fairly current was when they
> came up with the VAX. That was 25 years ago. Everything they sold was the
> OLDEST technology they could get and still foist of on the unwary buyer. They'd
> NEVER have used anything as up-to-date as what Intel pushes, not that it's the
> latest-greatest.
The Alpha is still superior to the IA64. What other operating system
has the same clustering capabilities as OpenVMS (or better)?
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
On September 4, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> The last time I remember DEC inventing anything fairly current was when they
> came up with the VAX. That was 25 years ago. Everything they sold was the
> OLDEST technology they could get and still foist of on the unwary buyer. They'd
> NEVER have used anything as up-to-date as what Intel pushes, not that it's the
> latest-greatest.
Troll alert.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> It's IEC 320, which is in several parts; you probably want Sheets C13, C14,
> C19 and C20.
>...(much useful information deleted)...
Thanks, Pete. With this information I can get the proper cable.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
> Fairly early examples are:
>
> 2/70 TEC inc. model 410/415, 420/425, 430/435
>
> 4/70 Applied Digital Data Systems (ADDS) Consul 920
My old friend Ray Borrill's first company...
> 5/70 Univac Uniscope 100
>
> 10/70 Hazeltine 2000
Ah, one of my favorites, used magnetic core for the memory;
however, it would usually lose a byte or two on either
powering down or back on again...
-dq
Is there anyone out there
- who has a manual for that maschine or
- who knows how to connect this maschine to an IBM- compatible XT or AT with
the cable which was supplied with the PC 05 as there is no possibility to
run other programs than those on the integrated modules (my provide
HHC_BASIC vsn 1.3; CALCULATOR and CLOCK) or
- who has any other information concerning the maschine?
Tom
On Sep 4, 17:17, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > > I remember a couple of months ago there was discussion on
> > > the proper cable for a BA440 power supply (normal North
> > > American three prong power cord but with a notch where it
> > > plugs in to the power supply). Was there a consensus on
> > > the designation (and any place in the US that sell them)?
> > > Dave McGuire <mcguire(a)neurotica.com> wrote:
> > Here is a copy of a message I sent on 7/22/2001 about this:
> >
> > They're are three power connectors in the "standard" family as
defined
> > by IEC...a low-, medium-, and high-current version. The low-current
> > version is the one we're all used to, 10A. The one on some MicroVAX
> > chassis is the 15A version. The third is a larger one (20A, I think
> > but I'm not sure) that has three flat pins in a triangular arrangement
> > but in two parallel planes, with a plain rectangular body. Tey're
> > found on some larger Cisco routers (7513 for one) and on SGI
> > Challenge-L systems for example.
>
> Dave, do you happen to have the IEC spec number?
It's IEC 320, which is in several parts; you probably want Sheets C13, C14,
C19 and C20.
I should point out that the current ratings used in the United States are
different for those used in Europe. Also that the current rating depends
on the type of cable, not just the connector. Many of the power cords
built to the spec are rated at 5A or 6A (6A was the original spec for the
common IEC 320 *connector* but it was uprated a few years ago) because the
*cable* in them is only rated for that much. The ordinary connectors are
rated for use at temperatures up to 65 Celcius, and are sometimes called
"cold condition" connectors.
The version with the notch (keyway) is called a "hot condition" connector,
and in Europe it's still only rated for 10A. However, hot condition
connectors are made of materials able to stand a higher temperature and are
used for things like electric kettles. They're rated for operation at up
to 120 Celcius. In the States the connector is rated for 16A (again,
assuming the cable itself is rated that high). The original intent was not
to provide a higher current rating but a higher operating temperature. It
just so happens that things that get hot (kettles) tend to use a lot of
current to do so :-)
The third version has the three pins all parallel in the same horizontal
plane (ie, 90 degrees around from the others), and is slightly larger.
It's rated at 16A in Europe (and for 20A in the States, I believe) but
only up to 65 Celcius.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Rumor has it that David Woyciesjes may have mentioned these words:
> It sounds like you would get more enjoyment out of building & using
>it, rather that letting it sit and collect dust. If you're toying with
>building it, I would say go for it, but keep all the packing and paperwork,
>too. That helps increase the 'value'.
>
>I think it all depends on whether you plan on selling it, or keeping it. I
>would definitely build & use it.
[snippage, fore and aft...]
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but the "reproducability" would be
decreased once the kit is built... i.e. you can't [easily] scan the boards,
or re-design them in AutoCad, etc...
With this in mind, I was digging thru an old box of CoCo stuff I have and I
came across (2) Xpndr1 expansion cards, 1 of which is virgin. A quick
search of Google shows nothing about them...
I've started re-designing the card in AutoCad (as if I didn't have *enough*
projects ;-) with improvements. Some are minor, like putting the signal
names on the top of the card instead of the bottom (so it's easier to see
the signal names when I attach a small breadboard to the top of the
card...) some are major (or going to be) like the extra room for standoffs
so it'll be self-supporting, and also connector ports for both a "PC hard
drive power port" and a "PC floppy drive power port" so you can power the
thing from any PC power supply *or* an FD-50x power supply. I also plan on
having one that buffers all of the data, address & major signal lines on
the board, so that experimenting might be easier without blowing the entire
CoCo bus.
Which leads to my questions:
A) Anybody know anything about the company that marketed these, as I don't
want to intentionally break any copyright laws; but with no info on the
internet & the extreme possibility of the company no longer existing, does
anyone think I'll be in trouble with the law WRT copyright laws? I'm mainly
just using the original as a pattern for (1) the signal names & pinouts,
and (2) the dimensions of the connectors & pins (I didn't have anything
else that had the ground pegs on either side of the connector).
B) I can prolly find this out for myself, but there are many others here
better than me on the hardware side of things: What would be some of the
better [a.k.a more useful] buffer chips I could use to buffer the address &
data busses?
C) Are there any *real* problems with powering the card from a separate
power supply? I'm assuming I need to tie the grounds together, but I
wouldn't want the +5 / +12 / -12 volt rails tied at all -- they should be
separate, right? [[no, I really don't feel like dissecting my MPI just
yet... altho I think it's the *only* piece of computer equipment I've never
taken apart! ]]
Should I check the voltage levels of the power supply & the CoCo to see
how close they are, or as long as they're both within TTL levels is it OK?
I'm mainly worried about the PC supply being of a higher voltage than the
CoCo, if that'll cause problems.
=-=-=-=-
The designs (when they get closer to completion) I will have on my website
for free, but if I make several cards and someone else is dumb^H^H^H^H bold
enough to purchase one I would sell them for a small profit...
Anywho, thanks for listening, and double-thanks for any advice that others
might be willing to offer... ;-)
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger --- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
Recycling is good, right??? Ok, so I'll recycle an old .sig.
If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead
disarmament should *not* be your first career choice.
I'll second that. There was a time when I thought HP was a great
company making great products. Although they still make some excellent
high-end computers, their home and office desktops and laptops are
horrible. I have never dealt with a single HP computer that worked
right. Their outstanding lead in the printer business is a thing of the
past. There are now many companies making printers just as good, for a
hell of a lot less money. Occasionally I see Circuit City or another
retailer running a contest in which the prize is a HP computer. My remark
is always "Second prize is _two_ HP computers."
OTOH, all of the Compaq computers that I have dealt with have been
trouble free. I think their maintenance HDD partition and peripheral
BIOS/peripheral management is great. About the only thing that I don't
like is their extremely proprietary design. That's fine on enterprise
servers. It's inexcusable on a business desktop that someone actually has
to support in a small business environment.
Arthur Clark
At 11:45 AM 9/4/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>After swallowing DEC, I'm glad to see COMPAQ get swallowed.
>
>But my opinion of Hewlett-Backward isn't what it used to be,
>and I don't think we'll be buying anymore DeskJam printers
>or DesignJam plotters, as they are no longer honoring the
>terms of the service contracts they sold us.
>
>Any escalating replies should be mailed to me privately...
>
>Regards,
>-dq
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Hellige [mailto:jhellige@earthlink.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:35 AM
> > To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> > Subject: HP & Compaq
> >
> >
> > So what's everyone think about the newest merger, between HP
> > and Compaq?
> >
> > Jeff
> > --
> > Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
> > http://www.cchaven.com
> > http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
> >
From: McManis, Charles <Charles.McManis(a)netapp.com>
>Of course Microsoft loses big because their two biggest licensees for
Wince are consolidating into one licensee.
Sometimes the dragon wins... It's nice to see the black knight's lance
being used for
a toothpick. ;)
Allison
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>The only HP things from which I've ever extracted useful work are my
plotters
>and printers. The HP CAE system we had when I was in the aerospace
industry was
Their printers are ok but, I have to go to Agilent for the test gear they
were known for.
>HP had scavenged from all over the country. I've never seen a
DEC/Compaq thing
>I liked. I must have observed these companies at the wrong stages in
their
>respective evolutions.
Yep!.
Allison
Hi All,
I have a Zenith H-89 based computer control system which needs few ICs.
Any body know place to buy these?
D765AC
C8208 - CPU?
C8087-1
WD2123-PL - I guess western digital disk controller.
Thanks for any info.
anil
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> You might well be mad as well, I can't comment (although I do believe
> that many people on classiccmp are at least mildly eccentric :-))
I agree. The diversity of the posters to this list is its best quality,
IMHO ;>)
> I can't really recomend damaging old hardware...
I have qualms about this as well.
> Really mad idea.... Take a classic computer, add a 31.25kbpx current loop
> serial interface, link it up to all sorts of old hardware (printers, disk
> drives, tape drives, etc), and have a device that takes Midi commands and
> gets that old hardware to make interesting sounds...
Brilliant idea, Tony. I have a classic ISA MIDI board, drivers and
software. Together they can control 64 MIDI channels. I wonder if I could
control some devices directly with MIDI data?
Thanks again for the great suggestions and help.
Glen
0/0
On September 4, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > They're are three power connectors in the "standard" family as defined
> > by IEC...a low-, medium-, and high-current version. The low-current
> > version is the one we're all used to, 10A. The one on some MicroVAX
> > chassis is the 15A version. The third is a larger one (20A, I think
> > but I'm not sure) that has three flat pins in a triangular arrangement
> > but in two parallel planes, with a plain rectangular body. Tey're
> > found on some larger Cisco routers (7513 for one) and on SGI
> > Challenge-L systems for example.
>
> Dave, do you happen to have the IEC spec number?
Nope..
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> My SYS$WELCOME doesn't mention any of them. However, I got a kick out of
> how the banner on the GUI Login still says "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|" under V7.2-1H1,
> though with 'xdm' from TCPIP 5.1 on other systems you never see it, it's
> freaky how it looks like a plain UNIX xdm.
With V7.3 it now says "Compaq".
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
> > I remember a couple of months ago there was discussion on
> > the proper cable for a BA440 power supply (normal North
> > American three prong power cord but with a notch where it
> > plugs in to the power supply). Was there a consensus on
> > the designation (and any place in the US that sell them)?
>
> Here is a copy of a message I sent on 7/22/2001 about this:
>
> They're are three power connectors in the "standard" family as defined
> by IEC...a low-, medium-, and high-current version. The low-current
> version is the one we're all used to, 10A. The one on some MicroVAX
> chassis is the 15A version. The third is a larger one (20A, I think
> but I'm not sure) that has three flat pins in a triangular arrangement
> but in two parallel planes, with a plain rectangular body. Tey're
> found on some larger Cisco routers (7513 for one) and on SGI
> Challenge-L systems for example.
Dave, do you happen to have the IEC spec number?
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Well I for one found it amusing that HP was trying to get away from the "PC" moniker calling them "access devices for the Internet" (which can also be palmtops etc). You know a really bright chap in corporate would say:
"Well we make lots of different
kinds of equipment, and we gave
all the analog stuff away to the
Agilent so we just have the
digital stuff. I know, we'll
call the combined company the
digital equipment company, gee
that has a nice ring to it."
Of course Microsoft loses big because their two biggest licensees for Wince are consolidating into one licensee.
--Chuck
> So if the power cable has the HP logo then you are way ahead of the
> rest of us...
I think it's unmarked.
> Of course, all my stuff still says "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|", except for
> the distribution CDROMs. My SYS$WELCOME says:
>
> Compaq may have bought Digital, but I'll
> always call it DEC.
>
> I'll have to update that now.
> --
> Eric Dittman
My SYS$WELCOME doesn't mention any of them. However, I got a kick out of
how the banner on the GUI Login still says "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|" under V7.2-1H1,
though with 'xdm' from TCPIP 5.1 on other systems you never see it, it's
freaky how it looks like a plain UNIX xdm.
As for saying Compaq, my 7.2 books, and my latest CD's are all that say it.
I'm just wondering what this will do to the price of used DS10's!
Zane
On September 4, Eric Dittman wrote:
> I remember a couple of months ago there was discussion on
> the proper cable for a BA440 power supply (normal North
> American three prong power cord but with a notch where it
> plugs in to the power supply). Was there a consensus on
> the designation (and any place in the US that sell them)?
Here is a copy of a message I sent on 7/22/2001 about this:
They're are three power connectors in the "standard" family as defined
by IEC...a low-, medium-, and high-current version. The low-current
version is the one we're all used to, 10A. The one on some MicroVAX
chassis is the 15A version. The third is a larger one (20A, I think
but I'm not sure) that has three flat pins in a triangular arrangement
but in two parallel planes, with a plain rectangular body. Tey're
found on some larger Cisco routers (7513 for one) and on SGI
Challenge-L systems for example.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
der Mouse ---
I'm passing this message onto the ClassicCmp.org mailing list also,
since there has been some mention of SS1 MAC addresses here too. Maybe we
(the ClassicCmp list) can provide you with more data, hopefully enough to
crack the code finally!
BTW, I also have a SparcStation 1 mainboard too, I'll just have to
stick that in one of the cases to power it up. Hopefully it still has it's
MAC address!
der Mouse's original NetBSD/Sparc post about this is at the end...
Don't forget to include him in the replies...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: der Mouse [mailto:mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA]
!
! > I'll be inspecting mine tomorrow, to add info to your sample base...
! > Anithing else I should look for and report, besides the barcode
! > numbers and descriptions?
!
! The four pieces of info I'm interested in are
!
! 1) four-character code
! 2) barcode
! 3) MAC address
! 4) hostid
!
! Each subset of more than one of those is of interest; the
! more complete
! a subset, the more interesting. Obviously, I'm particularly
! interested
! in filling in the gaps in the barcode table and in anything that can
! shed light on the contents-versus-label mapping, but anything is
! useful; even just a 4-char-code <-> barcode sample can serve as
! confirmation of what I've got.
! -----Original Message-----
! From: der Mouse [mailto:mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA]
!
I've got eight old 48T02 NVRAM chips whose batteries ahve run down.
I'd like to reconstruct the MAC address and hostid values corresponding
to them; all but one of them still has its barcode sticker (and I don't
expect to get anything useful for the one that's lost its sticker :-).
Mark Henderson's NVRAM FAQ says that Sun can reconstruct this given the
barcode (or, possibly, the four-character code also prinetd on the
sticker), but does not say how. Is that algorithm known, or partially
known? If not, I'll volunteer to collect data points to try to work it
out, if people with still-good NVRAMs will send their barcode and/or
four-character codes to me with the Ethernet address and hostid that
correspond. (I've got only three live samples in my own collection,
not really enough to tell much from.) I'll also be looking at mine to
see if there is an obvious correspondence between barcodes and
four-character codes.
The newer sort, the 48T08 sort, don't need this, since the last three
octets of the MAC address are identical to the low three bytes of the
hostid, and are printed under the barcode. It's just the old sort I'm
interested in here.
Any information appreciated.
Just a quickie to say I'm bowing out for a while, I'm being laid off this
week (telecoms bubble finally burst here too)... heh heh, plenty of free
time to get the PERQ monitor fixed at last. I suppose I ought to attempt to
find another job too, every silver lining has it's cloud ;-)
Nice to have "met" you all, hopefully I'll be back soon!
Cheers
Al.
Hi folks,
I have an HP 85, that I believe needs a replacement CPU chip.
There was a power supply fault caused by a misaligned flexible cable, which I
managed to repair. But, now the machine won't boot, and the CPU chip gets
very hot with 2 or 3 seconds of turning it on. I think there may be an
internal short, but I really need the schematic to know which leads to take
resistance measurements at to verify this. Does anybody have a copy? Also,
are there any people still carrying parts for this machine? I'd prefer to buy
a replacement CPU if possible rather than cannibalizing another machine.
-Chris
> >I remember a couple of months ago there was discussion on
> >the proper cable for a BA440 power supply (normal North
> >American three prong power cord but with a notch where it
> >plugs in to the power supply). Was there a consensus on
> >the designation (and any place in the US that sell them)?
>
> Mine came off of a modern HP-UX Workstation..... In light of the news the
> last couple days, that's rather ironic.
So if the power cable has the HP logo then you are way ahead of the
rest of us...
Of course, all my stuff still says "|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|", except for
the distribution CDROMs. My SYS$WELCOME says:
Compaq may have bought Digital, but I'll
always call it DEC.
I'll have to update that now.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
On September 4, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> Hopefully HP won't say, "Digital? whats that? Oh, that must be legacy
> stuff.... we don't handle that anymore" I hope they make alot of stuff
> availble online, plus keep VMS going.
HP knows quite well that "all the world's not a PeeCee", and they
understand...unlike many people...that PeeCees aren't the best tool
for every job. Last I heard, they were *still* making and selling
HP3000 systems.
This gives me some hope. I guess we'll all just have to wait and see
what happens.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
You're referring to the thought of 'mint condition' type collectible
value, aren't you? Like an original Star Wars action figure being worth more
when it's in the original retail packaging?
If so, that would depend on the condition of the packaging. How much
of it you have, how un-damaged it is, etc. Keep in mind though, value is in
the eye of the beholder.
It sounds like you would get more enjoyment out of building & using
it, rather that letting it sit and collect dust. If you're toying with
building it, I would say go for it, but keep all the packing and paperwork,
too. That helps increase the 'value'.
I think it all depends on whether you plan on selling it, or keeping it. I
would definitely build & use it.
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: Cini, Richard [mailto:RCini@congressfinancial.com]
! Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:20 PM
! To: 'ClassCompList'
! Subject: Keep or assemble???
!
!
! Hello, all:
!
! I'm wondering, without creating flame bait, the pros and cons of
! keeping a computer kit versus assembling it?
!
! I have an unbuilt Sinclair ZX81 kit that I'm toying
! with assembling.
! I also have a TV Typewriter-6 kit. I bought the TVT6 for my
! KIM-1 and the
! ZX81 I got in a trade.
!
! Thoughts?
!
! Rich
!
! ==========================
! Richard A. Cini, Jr.
! Congress Financial Corporation
! 1133 Avenue of the Americas
! 30th Floor
! New York, NY 10036
! (212) 545-4402
! (212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
!
Without question, I would keep it as an unbuilt kit.
For one, it is much more of a rarity that way.
Second, the unassembled parts can more easily be copied for new "reproduction" kits.
I believe that someone is now selling IMSAI reproduction kits.
Just my opinion,
Rob
BTW:
I retrieved much of my Altair stuff from my parents attic yesterday.
I did not see the VDM-1 manual, but I will look again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cini, Richard [SMTP:RCini@congressfinancial.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:20 PM
To: 'ClassCompList'
Subject: Keep or assemble???
Hello, all:
I'm wondering, without creating flame bait, the pros and cons of
keeping a computer kit versus assembling it?
I have an unbuilt Sinclair ZX81 kit that I'm toying with assembling.
I also have a TV Typewriter-6 kit. I bought the TVT6 for my KIM-1 and the
ZX81 I got in a trade.
Thoughts?
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
Looking to purchase retired software and / or installation guides or manuals for both the Unix based software and hardware made by Arete [Arix] in the mid-80's. Please contact Malinda Muller @ 213.689.6418 with information or offers.
Los Angeles Librarian
Crosby Heafey Roach & May
700 S. Flower St. Ste. 2200
Los Angeles, Ca. 90017
213.689.6418 fax: 213.896.8080
Ok, I took some of your suggestions, added some of my ideas, etc. and
instead of working on my exhibit (I have pleeennnttyyy of time!) I
designed & printed buttons today.
Here is a pic of 20 of the 25 or so designs:
http://www.jps.net/foxnhare/badges.jpg
(I left the jpeg maxed at 312k, just so you can read the small print.)
Many of those I have 3 or more, and a few I did one shot ones. These
are all saved and they also make great stickers. (=))
comments? I have 10 still to re-do if you have any last requests.
Larry
--
01000011 01001111 01001101 01001101 01001111 01000100 01001111 01010010 01000101
Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (209) 754-1363
300-14.4k bps
Classic Commodore pages at: http://www.jps.net/foxnhare/commodore.html
01000011 01001111 01001101 01010000 01010101 01010100 01000101 01010010 01010011
Hopefully, there is one amongst you that can give this chap a
leg up on getting his H-89 going with a boot disk. Regrettably,
I am unable to help him.
Please contact him directly.
- don
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 03:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nick Sledz <nsledz(a)yahoo.com>
To: donm(a)crash.cts.com
Cc: nsledz(a)yahoo.com
Subject: HeathKit H-89 boot disks ?
Dear Mr. Maslin,
I am don't know if you deal with the Dina-SIG archive
anymore, but perhaps you could forward it to someone
who does....
I am attempting to locate a copy of the cp/m boot
disks for a HeathKit H-89 (circa 1981) which I
recently acquired. It uses hard sector 5 1/4 floppies
which is a real pain.
I remember seeing a newsgroup post that said you folks
had some H-89 stuff in your archive.
I may need to write a program to do a serial transfer
files onto the H-89 machine. Do you have any
programming languages available as well?
If you have this available, please let me know the
cost, and I'll send a donation.
-Thanks for your help!
Nick
****************************
Nicholas Sledziona
304 Winston Drive
Ithaca, NY 14850
Phone: 607-266-0374
email: nsledz(a)yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
In a message dated 09/01/2001 12:27:42, you wrote:
>
>I recently aquired an HP-9000/735-120, minus the RAM
>and (I've just realized) the CPU! Grrrrrr.
>
>Anyone know of a reasonably-priced source for these
>items?
>
Try Mike Nicewongers site twmaster.com
This reminds me of Stomp and The Blue Man Group
(http://www.blueman.com/)...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
! -----Original Message-----
! From: jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de [mailto:jkunz@unixag-kl.fh-kl.de]
! Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 4:23 PM
! To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
! Subject: Re: symphony for dot matrix printers
!
!
! On 1 Sep, Glen Goodwin wrote:
!
! > Some useable sounds might be:
! >
! > (printers, of course)
! Don't forget pen plotters hamering the pen down on to the
! paper, sirring
! steppers, ...
!
! > hard drive spinup & chatter
! load and unload of removable media (MOD, ...)
!
! > crt charge & discharge
! > floppy drive stepper motors
! > ps fans
! > cpu cooling fans
! and the pumps of the water cooling...
!
! > tape drives
! Uhhh. I have to record the sound of my 9 track pneumatic autoloader
! (cipher F880):
! klick, KLACK, (tape gets locked...)
! bss, bssss, (and rewound)
! fffffFFFFFFF.... (fan spins up),
! bss-shldl-shldl-shldl-shldl, (tape gets roled off and blown throgh the
! drive mechanics)
! klick-klack, klick-klack, klick-klack (tape gets caught at the other
! spindle)
! bsss, BSSS, BSSSSSSSSBSSSBSSS, (tape gets positioned at BOT)
!
! > ASR 33s
! > PAC readers
! > card readers
! modems and acoustic couplers
! beepers (in terminals)
! typing on a keyboard (with micro switchs)
! power and other switches
! start up sounds (Apple, SGI)
! opening and closing enclosures
! roling enclosures (with wheels) around
! --
!
!
!
! tschuess,
! Jochen
!
! Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz
!
On September 1, Bill Pechter wrote:
> Actually, DEC's tape drives were abysmal in design (not counting the
> DECtapes which were really reel-to-reel disk drives.
Yes, DECtapes are very cool. DLTs are pretty nice too; they FINALLY
fixed the TK50 after a few iterations! ;)
> The RL0x's were pretty slick and the RK05/6/7's were ok. RM80's needed
> the RA81's 400+meg hda to be competitive... The RA81's would've been
> nice if the breather glue problem didn't occur.
RLs and RKs (especially RK06/7) are wonderful drives. I've used a
lot of both and I love 'em.
Anybody know if DEC ever made a Qbus RK06/7 controller?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
Hello,
I have an HP 9000/800 F20 machine that I don't have a video card for, so I
cannot just plug a monitor to it. I also don't have a keyboard. The
machine powers on and has HP-UX on it.
I bought a cable that is supposed to connect my PC to the serial console
connector on the F20. When I connect I can see HP-UX booting, but nothing I
type seems to be getting through to the F20. I wonder if it is due to some
password protection, or is it due to wrong terminal settings?
I'd be grateful for any hints.
Jacek Artymiak
--
OnetKomunikator - porozumiesz sie
z innymi [ http://ok.onet.pl/instaluj.html ]
On Sep 3, 20:11, Tom Uban wrote:
> Jameco electronics still sells them.
>
> At 01:12 AM 9/4/01 +0100, Adrian wrote:
> >Does anyone have any spare 2114 (or alternative pin compatible 1KBx4)
SRAM
> >chips hanging about doing nothing useful?
> >
> >I have a PET 2001 with one blown chip, and neither Farnell nor RS do
them
> >any more :(
Ade, I have a few. Email me your address off-list, and I'll post you one.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Well, according to the New York Times (as seen on /.) it looks like HP is
buying Compaq for 25 Billion dollars!?!? It looks like I've gone from
being a DEC collector, to a Compaq collector, to a HP collector. Huh!
Zane (who is wondering what this means for OpenVMS)
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
I am looking for a VAX computer system, such as the DEC VAX 11/780. I am also
looking for its hardware, Monitors, Keyboards, Printers, Disk Drives, Hard
drives, Tape drives, etc. Please E-mail me at XwingFhtr(a)aol.com. Thank you.
> > Actually, DEC's tape drives were abysmal in design (not counting the
> > DECtapes which were really reel-to-reel disk drives.
>
> Yes, DECtapes are very cool. DLTs are pretty nice too; they FINALLY
> fixed the TK50 after a few iterations! ;)
The TK50 was not so great; the TK70 was much more reliable. I don't have
any experience with the TZ30 (although I do have one somewhere). The Tx85,
Tx86, Tx87, Tx88, and Tx89 all seem to be exceptionally reliable (along with
the equivalent DLTx000 drives). I used to use DAT at home. Now I use a
DLT4700 system.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net