- test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org - classiccmp.org

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by dhquebbeman＠theestopinalgroup.com

> > At 10:26 AM 10/10/01 -0400, you wrote: > > >On October 10, Iggy Drougge wrote: > > >> >How about the original DIX Ethernet? Try a web search for Aloha. > > >> > > >> Was DIX really the original Ethernet? Wasn't that 10 Mbps and all? > > > > > > I believe the original Ethernet was 3Mbps. > > > > > > -Dave > On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Tom Uban wrote: > > > Hmm, looking at my copy of: "The Ethernet, A Local Area Network, > > Data Link Layer and Physical Layer Specifications", from Digital, > > Intel, and Xerox, September 30, 1980 -- the specification says: > > "Data rate: 10 Million bits/sec" > > I don't know if it went to standard, but there definitely was 3Mbps > ether. I have a CHANNEL-3Mbps card for an S/370 here. You're right, Dave & Sridhar... from: http://www.baylor.edu/~Sharon_P_Johnson/etg/ethernethistory.htm 1972-The first experimental Ethernet system, Alto Aloha Network, was developed by Metcalfe and his Xerox PARC colleagues. It was designed to interconnect the Xerox Alto, a personal workstation with a graphical user interface, and linked Altos to one another, and to servers and laser printers. The data transmission rate was 2.94 Mbps [Spurgeon]. Regards, -doug q

25 years

1
0
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 10, Iggy Drougge wrote: > >How about the original DIX Ethernet? Try a web search for Aloha. > > Was DIX really the original Ethernet? Wasn't that 10 Mbps and all? I believe the original Ethernet was 3Mbps. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

3
2
0 0

Slightly OT: What to do with a DEC 3000/300?

by healyzh＠aracnet.com

> Anyway, I've heard that 64Meg RAM was awfully tight to run VMS on an Alpha, > but is it still faster than Tru64 Unix? (The machine was no screamer, but > it was still faster than my wife... ;-) Or should I just sell it to someone > willing to give it a good home? (I have too many computers now - and I'm > trying to purchase a [smaller] house so may be moving soon... I *need* to > consolidate my collection & am downsizing machines which I will never have > time to tinker with...) If the DEC 3000/300 is anything like a DEC 3000/300LX then you should be able to get some 72-pin true parity SIMMs and upgrade your RAM. If you can get it up to a minimum of 112MB it should work great. If you can get it up to 96MB it will work OK. Less than 96MB, and it will work, but will probably do a fair amount of swaping. OpenVMS V7.2 won't even load if you've got less than 64MB RAM. It's definitly a good VMS box, so I say keep it, get some more RAM for it, and play with VMS on it. I used my DEC 3000/300LX as my OpenVMS server for a while with a BA350 chassis attached to it for disks. Zane

25 years

2
1
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 9, 17:33, Eric Dittman wrote: > > > > IP over carrier pigeon!! > > > > > > UUCP over floppies ferried by cars! BLEEEAAAAAARGH!! > > > > > > Peace... Sridhar > > > > Unless I'm mistaken Dave is talking about a transmittion method that's > > actually been used. There is actually an RFC for it. > > Haven't carrier pigeons been extinct long before IP and UUCP were > developed? Nope. The RFC exists (RFC 1149) and there has been a practical implementation. See http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ vegard@gyversalen:~$ ping -i 900 10.0.3.1 PING 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6165731.1 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3211900.8 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=5124922.8 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=6388671.9 ms --- 10.0.3.1 ping statistics --- 9 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 55% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 3211900.8/5222806.6/6388671.9 ms vegard@gyversalen:~$ -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

3
2
0 0

NeXT users...

by vance＠ikickass.org

I just discovered Window Maker. Installed it on my SGI Indigo2 Maximum IMPACT. Oh my god. It's like a dream. Running IRIX with the interface of NeXTstep. I love it. Time to install it on all my headed workstations. Peace... Sridhar

25 years

4
4
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 9, Pete Turnbull wrote: > much larger house :-) The same fibre that carries FOIRL can (if it's the > right size, 50/125) carry 10baseF, 100baseFX, 1000baseSX, ATM, FDDI, ... FDDI generally uses 62.5/125 fiber. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

1
0
0 0

NeXT users...

by technos＠nerdland.org

Another good one is Enlightenment.. It has some crazy deps, but it supposedly compiles and looks mad snazzy.. I've used it on Sun and Alpha (as well as a myriad of wintel) but never on SGI. Jim On Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:27 AM, One Without Reason [SMTP:vance@ikickass.org] wrote: > > I just discovered Window Maker. Installed it on my SGI Indigo2 Maximum > IMPACT. Oh my god. It's like a dream. Running IRIX with the interface > of NeXTstep. I love it. Time to install it on all my headed > workstations. > > Peace... Sridhar

25 years

2
1
0 0

2.88 MB floppy drive, scsi?

by technos＠nerdland.org

Non-IBM, PS/2 floppy drives?? Isn't that an oxymoron? What about the Mitsubishi drives made for IBM? Jim (Isn't misuse of grammar fun?) On Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:46 AM, Mike Ford [SMTP:mikeford@socal.rr.com] wrote: > I've been looking for some 2.88 non-IBM PS/2 floppy drives, and I found > some, but the guy says they are SCSI. Is that nuts or what? > > TEAC FD-235 J 5670-U W/SCSI Card > TEAC FD-235 J 5670-U W/SCSI Card > TEAC FD-235 J 610 W/SCSI Card > > Some of the HP/Apollo 725/50 computers I found recently had SCSI floppies, > but it looked like the SCSI part might be detachable. I wonder if I should > bother getting the above drives to work in a PC, which I would have to fuss > around adding SCSI to? >

25 years

2
1
0 0

Squealing CRTs

by dittman＠dittman.net

> Now for real HV - I was told by an ex-electrical > engineer - that he watched while someone > was measuring up for a new HV cabinet with > a tape measure. The usual metal sort you or I > might use for DIY. He dropped it and shorted > out the busbars, instantly melted the tape > and ended up in hospital with major burns > across his arms and chest. At a place I used to work we were setting up a new raised floor. The (licensed!) electrician that was setting up the new UPS was leaning with his hand against one end of the bank of batteries. He leaned down to tighten the nut on the other end of the bank of batteries with a metal socket wrench. The UPS was about the size of four large refrigerators side-by-side, 90% of which was filled with batteries. He nearly died and spent quite a long time in the hospital. The investigation kept the area closed for almost a week. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

2
1
0 0

emulex uc13/14

by telefonk＠mail.bme.hu

My name is Mihaly Fazekas. My english is not good. My question: where can i find info/manual/sheet from Emulex UC13/14 Unibus SCSI controller?

25 years

1
0
0 0

Half-duplex VT420?

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 9, Iggy Drougge wrote: > Since I'll be running another headless computer (HP 9000/380), I brought home > my VT420. Nice terminal, but unfortunately this specimen will only talk, not > listen. > At first, I suspected my HP had lost its settings (the stupid boot PROM must > be set via the keyboard to use a serial console). I proceeded to bring my HIL > keyboard home and set it (without any screen) to use a "remote" console again, > and the machine seemed to acknowledge that, beeping happily. But no response > from the terminal. So I tested it with my DECstation. No response there > either. So I hooked it up to my Amiga. Typing at the keyboard, there was > output in NComm, but doing the opposite didn't work at all. > So we have only one-way communication. What could be the problem? Is flow control enabled on the terminal? I assume you're using a DB25 adapter at the other end of an MMJ cable. Try turning off flow control in the communications setup menu and shorting pins 2-3 on the connector. At that point the terminal should echo what you type back to the display. If it doesn't, you might have a toasty RS232 line receiver in your terminal. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

8
17
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by technos＠nerdland.org

Naw.. Passenger pigeons were good eatin'.. They were hunted to death. Jim On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:41 PM, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [SMTP:cisin@xenosoft.com] wrote: > > One is extinct, the other isn't. > > Due to trying to carry passengers?

25 years

1
0
0 0

Bird Electronics

by jpl15＠panix.com

The passenger pigeon modulates the carrier pigeon. (Although this certainly makes for messy packets.) Cheerz John

25 years

1
0
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by technos＠nerdland.org

One is extinct, the other isn't. Jim On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:37 PM, Dan Linder [SMTP:dlinder@uiuc.edu] wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Peter C. Wallace wrote: > > > > Haven't carrier pigeons been extinct long before IP and UUCP were > > > developed? > > > > Nah, Its passenger pigeons taht are extinct... > > okay, I'll bite... what's the difference between a "carrier pigeon" and a > "passenger pigeon"? > > - Dan > > Dan Linder / dlinder @ uiuc.edu > Graduate Student, College of Engineering, Dept. of Computer Science > - Dept. of Computer Science Teaching Assistant > - DRES Computer Accessibility Researcher

25 years

2
1
0 0

New toy, some questions..

by technos＠nerdland.org

For a birthday present, my girlfriend tracked down and bought me a Radio Shack PC-1 with cassette adapter (Both in orig boxes!). It compliments nicely the PC-2 and plotter I already have. After addition of four 1.35V zinc-air hearing aid batteries, it's humming along on my desk counting up by eights.. Does anyone still have software for this beastie? My other Q is converter programs. wav2bin (Sharp calc converter) supports it fine (its just a rebadged PC-1211) but the companion program bin2wav does not. Do other conversion programs exist? Are there any that run under *nixen? Any with source? I have tried contacting the fine folks at www.pocketmuseum.com, as they seem to be the author of the software mentioned already, to no avail (broken email addy). Jim

25 years

1
0
0 0

8073-based SBC info

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

It's NIBBLE Tinybasic, there was an old BYTE or KB Article on the earlier 8a500 version of same. _If_ I ever get to the bottom of my pile I have the manual for the National version of the SBC with the 8073 on it. Allison -----Original Message----- From: Richard A. Cini, Jr. <rcini(a)optonline.net> To: ClassCompList <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> Date: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:26 PM Subject: 8073-based SBC info Hello, all: I just received a National Semiconductor SBC kit that's based on its 8070-series 8-bit processor. It's got a version of TinyBASIC written by National as an instrumentation and control language. I have a family data sheet and a short industry article but no programming or user's manual. The board is manufactured by Sterling. There is almost no information on this board available through the usual search engines. Any info appreciated. Thanks. Rich Rich Cini Collector of classic computers Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/ /************************************************************/

25 years

1
0
0 0

VMS, UCX, DHCP?

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

Simple solution, use a PC for it's best other use {first one is doorstop} and load up linux as a NAT box and put that in between cable and VAX. Then you can run the vax with static IP. Or better yet use a Microvax2000 and run netbsd so you dont have to have a PC in that spot. Allison -----Original Message----- From: Iggy Drougge <optimus(a)canit.se> To: Classic computing <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> Date: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: VMS, UCX, DHCP? >Now that I've got "broadband", I'd like to see my VAXstation on the net. It's >running VMS 5.1 and UCX, but does it have any DHCP capabilities? >It's not a great problem, but if there is some option for getting config info >via DHCP, it'd save me the trouble of setting up a NetBSD environment in order >to run dhclient. =) > >-- >En ligne avec Thor 2.6a. > >Amiga 4000/040 25MHz/64MB/20GB RetinaBLTZ3/VLab/FastlaneZ3/Ariadne/Toccata > >

25 years

2
1
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by technos＠nerdland.org

What about StarLan?? I think I have some full length 8-bit ISA StarLan cards in a closet if you want em.. No other equip tho.. Jim On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:50 PM, Tarsi [SMTP:tarsi@binhost.com] wrote: > Dear all, > > I've decided that one of my goals is to run every networking topology > possible in my house, regardless if I actually NEED to run them or not. :) > > My plan is to place 1 linux box running a card from each topology in it and > use that to bridge all (or almost all) topologies. > > I currently have running 10bT ethernet, 10b2 ethernet, Localtalk over > PhoneNET and the beginnings of Arcnet. > > In light of such, I have a series of questions: > > 1) Who knows some stuff about ArcNet? I've gotten 4 cards (8-bit ISA) and a > > 16-port active hub. I've read somewhere that cards are either hubbable or > not. Any other info on that? > > 2) Anyone have any (I think it is) 93ohm coax arcnet patch cables that they > want to get rid of? > > 3) Anyone got good resources on ThickNET? (10b5 I think it is?) I know it > was run back in the day, and I know some precursory things about it (the > funky vampire taps, etc.) Anyone have either resources or hardware on this > topology that they'd like to share/sell/etc? :) > > 4) Any other interesting topologies I should try? I have plans to do: > Arcnet, FDDI, Token ring, Localtalk, 10b2, 10b5, 10bT, 10bTX, 10bFiber, and > (eventually) 802.11b wireless. > > Thanks folks! > > Tarsi > 210 > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------- > Homepage: http://tarsi.binhost.com > binHOST.com: http://www.binhost.com > Forever Beyond: http://www.foreverbeyond.org > ----------------------------------------------

25 years

1
0
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 9, Absurdly Obtuse wrote: > > Unless I'm mistaken Dave is talking about a transmittion method that's > > actually been used. There is actually an RFC for it. > > I know someone who measured the bandwidth and latency of himself carrying > a backpack full of floppies across the campus of Clarkson. This sounds like the age-old "never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magtapes" story. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

2
1
0 0

8073-based SBC info

by rcini＠optonline.net

Hello, all: I just received a National Semiconductor SBC kit that's based on its 8070-series 8-bit processor. It's got a version of TinyBASIC written by National as an instrumentation and control language. I have a family data sheet and a short industry article but no programming or user's manual. The board is manufactured by Sterling. There is almost no information on this board available through the usual search engines. Any info appreciated. Thanks. Rich Rich Cini Collector of classic computers Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/ /************************************************************/

25 years

1
0
0 0

VMS, UCX, DHCP?

by dittman＠dittman.net

> Simple solution, use a PC for it's best other use {first one is doorstop} > and load up linux as a NAT box and put that in between cable and VAX. > Then you can run the vax with static IP. Or better yet use a > Microvax2000 > and run netbsd so you dont have to have a PC in that spot. I actually prefer to use a little BookPC-format boxes running Linux Linux for my Internet gateway. The system is cheap, little, quiet, and doesn't get very hot. I can stick it behind my other systems. It has a large capacity IDE drive in it and I also use it for a mail and http server. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

1
0
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 9, John Allain wrote: > > a 747 was packed with DLTs and flown from > > San Francisco to Seattle. > > Such a transport could easily easily exceed 1,024 TeraBytes. > (forgot the Prefixname) What'd they need all that data for? PORN!! Ahem, sorry, I just couldn't resist. :) -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

1
0
0 0

classiccmp@classiccmp.org

by cpg＠aladdin.de

On 10/09/2001 03:53:03 PM EST Dan Wright wrote: > >Dave McGuire said: >> >> IP over carrier pigeon!! > >There's even an RFC for this: > >http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt?number=1149 And a proof-of-concept implementation has been done: http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ :-) :-) regards, chris

25 years

1
0
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by mythtech＠Mac.com

>4) Any other interesting topologies I should try? I have plans to do: >Arcnet, FDDI, Token ring, Localtalk, 10b2, 10b5, 10bT, 10bTX, 10bFiber, and >(eventually) 802.11b wireless. If you decide to do TokenRing, and need some cards... let me know... I have 3 box loads of them up for grabs (just pay shipping). I have ISA, Microchannel, and I think I might have had a PCI in there somewhere. I already got rid of the EISA ones. Oh, and I might have an HP Jetdirect card for TokenRing. Sorry, I have no hubs (they used hubs of a sort right?) or cables. And you forgot to list on your list of topologies SneakerNet, unless you never run anything around your house by foot. -chris <http://www.mythtech.net>

25 years

1
0
0 0

IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk wrote: >But seriously, the advantage of paper manuals is that you can read them >anywhere (like in bed, on the train, etc) , you can have them open on >your workbench (where there certainly isn't room for a PC in my case), >you can write notes all over them, etc. And I find them a lot easier to >read... All very true and I completely agree. I too generally prefer paper manuals. I would also hate to read a manual on-screen cover to cover (i.e. for anything other than reference). However, my space is restricted. I could have maybe 300 manuals within easy reach here. I have a wall-mounted CD rack with space for 300 CDs just feet away. >> >> I don't expect to read my manual on the Rainbow that I >> am repairing ... that's what the PC or laptop >Need any hints? I've got a fair idea as to what goes on inside the 'bow >(pinouts, theory, etc). Some of it is not obvious (like the disk >controller test which feeds the output of the serial chip in sync mode to >the read data pin of the FDC to check that the latter can decode data >correctly). I have the tech manuals but this is the PSU (second one which I've had die on me!) The first one turned out to be the bridge rectifier ... I found a suitable replacement and bingo it came back to life. Only a few weeks later I found somewhere that sold security bits online, one of which fits the Rainbow PSU - so at least this time I won't be sawing a slow in the screw to get at the thing! This time whatever died has taken out more of the downstream stuff. I've not had too much time to look at it - you don't happen to have the PSU schematics do you? ... I've got everything else (I think) except that. >I've never quite understood this... 20-30 years ago, most computers used >standard chips. And thus they could be copied (I am not talking about >legality here). But the schematics existed. Manuals explaining the >schematics existed. In DEC, I was told that they stopped supplying them when they noticed that customers did not want them any more (and obviously these things - especially technical manuals) cost mucho denaro to produce ... schematics must already exist obviously! This was when the customer base moved from being propeller-heads to suits. >Now we have ASICs which are much harder to copy, and yet the docs don't >exist... > >Anyway, any half-decent hacker can reverse-engineer most devices in a >couple of days at most.... The board for which I am currently scribbling software has a few standard, identifiable chips on it but the interconnections are mostly mediated by a few large FPGAs. There are also some custom ASICs in there too. The memory map is entirely decided by the FPGA. Adding and removing caps resistors and other SMT components is not too bad but playing with one of the 750-plus pin BGA devices is probably beyond the realm of the hobbyist (although re-work houses do exist, so who knows?) >> my current TV came with a five year guarantee and the >> previous one was a Decca series 80 chassis that was already >I probably have that schematic somewhere... I've got a lot of volumes of >Poole+Molloy (and its successors) on the shelf. For the record, it's a Philips 21PT5322 and the other one is a Fergusson T14R. (The latter is now out of guarantee and is therfore "fair game" ... ). Antonio

25 years

1
0
0 0

Repair philosophy (was Re: IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof)

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 9, Mark Tapley wrote: > going to college in about 10 years, so I gotta earn tuition, and then > there's paying for the classic computer shed that the wife insists on > filling with "nice furniture" and "decorating" because she thinks of it as > a "house"....) I added a decoration a while back. It's a VAX4000-700a. Gorgeous. Functional, too. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

1
0
0 0

Squealing CRTs

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

> Chris [SMTP:mythtech@Mac.com] wrote: > >I wasn't that lucky... when I did it, I shorted a cap thru my finger >(fortuantly, just thru ONE finger, tip to knuckle). I was working blind You don't need HV - large currents can be nasty too. The PSUs in some of the VAX 6000/7000 platforms are only +5V but can dump 100s of amps. You probably don't want to short one of those with your ring finger! Now for real HV - I was told by an ex-electrical engineer - that he watched while someone was measuring up for a new HV cabinet with a tape measure. The usual metal sort you or I might use for DIY. He dropped it and shorted out the busbars, instantly melted the tape and ended up in hospital with major burns across his arms and chest. Having been hit a few times by mains (240V) voltage, I've learned to be more careful and switch stuff off! Antonio

25 years

1
0
0 0

Repair philosophy (was Re: IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof)

by mtapley＠swri.edu

Among quite a bit of other wisdom, Tony wrote: >Heck, all I want are things like pinouts.... Ah, the pot 'o gold at the end of the rainbow! A skilled repairman, who works for pinouts.... :-) More seriously, while I aspire to fix things like Tony, I find that ignorance and lack of time are powerful disincentives. (The little one needs his diapers (nappies?) changed, and the bigger little one is gonna be going to college in about 10 years, so I gotta earn tuition, and then there's paying for the classic computer shed that the wife insists on filling with "nice furniture" and "decorating" because she thinks of it as a "house"....) I can swap modules. When I click the switch and nothing at all happens, and I have a new power supply on hand .... it's within my limited time and knowledge horizons to swap 'em. Getting an o-scope, learning how to use it, taking apart the power supply (and trusting that the little one won't ingest some of the nuts and washers while the medium-size one is getting a talking-to about sliding down the bannister with the power cord in tow).... well, that may be without my horizons. All this ranting leads to my question, to the group as a whole and Tony in particular: Is there a way I tell that it'll be safe to board-swap? In other words, are there symptoms I can in general use to tell me that the fault that caused damage was on the damaged (e.g.) board, and that therefore, if I have another example of that board, I won't fry it too by putting it into the place of the damaged one? - Mark

25 years

2
1
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by dhquebbeman＠theestopinalgroup.com

> In light of such, I have a series of questions: > > 1) Who knows some stuff about ArcNet? I've gotten 4 cards (8-bit ISA) and a > 16-port active hub. I've read somewhere that cards are either hubbable or > not. Any other info on that? I've never used an active hub before... and was thus limited to 4 nodes using my home-made passive hub. > 2) Anyone have any (I think it is) 93ohm coax arcnet patch cables that they > want to get rid of? I think you'll have trouble if you use anything other than 63 ohm coax... ... Formerly, the support for ARCNET in Linux was pretty week. However, there was an ARCNET/LINUX mailing list for a long time, and the members were keeping the driver sources up-to-date. The name of the list owner (or the guy cranking out the code) was, first name, Avery, last name, Pennimum or something unusal. hth, -doug quebbeman

25 years

1
0
0 0

VMS, UCX, DHCP?

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

> Paul Thompson wrote: >I think multinet supports DHCP. I am not familiar enough with TCPIP >services for VMS (UCX), however. Multinet has a hobby program. >On 9 Oct 2001, Iggy Drougge wrote: >> Now that I've got "broadband", I'd like to see my VAXstation on the net. It's >> running VMS 5.1 and UCX, but does it have any DHCP capabilities? >> It's not a great problem, but if there is some option for getting config info >> via DHCP, it'd save me the trouble of setting up a NetBSD environment in order >> to run dhclient. =) I believe that the latest UCX (TCPIP as it is now called) does support DHCP. The manuals should be around somewhere under http://www.openvms.compaq.com Antonio

25 years

1
0
0 0

ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

(reply at end...) ! On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Tarsi wrote: ! > Dear all, ! > ! > I've decided that one of my goals is to run every ! > networking topology possible in my house, regardless ! > if I actually NEED to run them or not. :)... ..... ! > I currently have running 10bT ethernet, 10b2 ethernet, ! > Localtalk over PhoneNET and the beginnings of Arcnet. ! > ! > In light of such,... ..... ! > 4) Any other interesting topologies I should try? I have ! > plans to do: ! > Arcnet, FDDI, Token ring, Localtalk, 10b2, 10b5, 10bT, ! > 10bTX, 10bFiber, and (eventually) 802.11b wireless. ! > ! > Thanks folks! ! -----Original Message----- ! From: Absurdly Obtuse [mailto:vance@ikickass.org] ! ! FDDI would definitely be a good one to do. It uses dual ! counter-rotating rings. How about ATM? HIPPI? CI? ! CHANNEL-CHANNEL? ...And someone asked if _I_ was masochistic when I only asked about upgrading a 486! --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818

25 years

1
0
0 0

VMS, UCX, DHCP?

by optimus＠canit.se

Now that I've got "broadband", I'd like to see my VAXstation on the net. It's running VMS 5.1 and UCX, but does it have any DHCP capabilities? It's not a great problem, but if there is some option for getting config info via DHCP, it'd save me the trouble of setting up a NetBSD environment in order to run dhclient. =) -- En ligne avec Thor 2.6a. Amiga 4000/040 25MHz/64MB/20GB RetinaBLTZ3/VLab/FastlaneZ3/Ariadne/Toccata

25 years

3
2
0 0

Squealing CRTs

by optimus＠canit.se

Heller to everyone and Tony. ;-) What do you do about a squealing CRT? I've got this nice terminal which is working, but it emits a high-pitched whine which is not only unpleasant and annoying, but quite scary, too. It feels as thoughit's going to blow in your face any minute. The terminal in question is a green-screen TECO VA120. -- En ligne avec Thor 2.6a. Ky?suke: Jag heter Kurre, Kurre Carlsson! Jag: Det heter du inte alls!

25 years

6
16
0 0

ZX Spectrum internals (Was: ZX81 kits)

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

Tony Duell wrote: > Sinclair would never do anything that would cost a few pence more, even > if it made the machine more useable, or work better (or in a couple of > classic cases, even work at all). Which Sinclair machines are you referring to here -- which ones didn't "even work at all?" Glen 0/0

25 years

2
1
0 0

IBM PowerStation 320H...

by ndiablo＠diablonet.net

Hi! I just picked up an IBM PowerStation 320H from the property disposition warehouse of my friendly educational institution. It seems to be in relatively good shape with all components present, but all I could really afford was the system unit (which was only one dollar). Although the University seems to be pretty consistent with wiping the hard drives of all the machines that it disposes of, I'm still rather eager to try and power it up and see what the firmware's like, and whether or not it is ACTUALLY wiped. Since I don't have a monitor/keyboard/mouse for it, though, my only option is to try to use a serial console. Unfortunately, these machines use a really wierd 10-pin serial port. I've tried searching around on the Internet for a pinout, but to no avail. Does anyone here have any idea how I can break this out to something more standard? I think I remember reading somewhere it was rather similar to the PC-RT serial ports... Thanks for any help! --Sean Caron (root(a)diablonet.net) | http://www.diablonet.net

25 years

3
2
0 0

Looking for documentation/info

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

! >>Sounds like a 486SX/25 system upgraded to a DX2/50 with an ! OverDrive chip. ! > ! >Or somebody stuck in a DX-50 and its just running at 25 MHz. I ran an Evergreen test program on it last night. It said it was running at 50MHz, internally? ! If the chip inserted into the other socket is a plain DX-50 ! then it would be just running at 25mhz. The insertion of the DX-50 ! or a 487 'coprocessor' would've disabled the SX-25 as well, if it was ! left installed. Too bad the DX-50 got such a bad rap for heat ! problems early on. ! ! BTW, does anyone know how the mainboard tells the difference ! between the 486SX and a 486DX/487? Just looking at them, there ! aren't any pin differences externally, at least between the 486DX-33 ! and 486SX-25 I have sitting here. IIRC, it's how you set the jumpers for the clock multiplier, for the speed; and it does some sort of detection test for the numeric processor. I think... These clock speed jumpers are what I'd like to identify first. I have a DX4/100 just sitting here. Then, I want to identify the purpose of the other 20+ jumpers on this board... --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818

25 years

2
1
0 0

CBM8032 - wobbly screen (The saga continues)

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 8, 23:11, Tony Duell wrote: > > Anneal - is that where you heat it up & hit it with a hammer? Or do you > > just heat it up and let it cool again? I forget now... It's been a long > > Heat it up and let it cool slowly (very slowly). Only for steel. Most other metals either don't care (unless the quenching is incredibly rapid) or actually require to be quenched. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

2
1
0 0

CBM8032 - wobbly screen

by avickers＠solutionengineers.com

Hi again folks, My US 8032 turned up today (yay!). Since I can't modify the transformer (unfortunately - it looks like the US one doesn't have dual primary taps like the UK one), I've swapped it out with the 240vac transformer from my other (still broken) 8032. This machine has a wobbly screen, just like the 8032-SK (which was broken, but I installed the working motherboard), the other 8032 (which was working, until I swapped the broken m/b), and the 3016. In fact, the only PET I've got which *doesn't* have a wobbly screen is the 2001. Well, it does wobble, but only a tiny bit. ISTR a discussion (mostly with Tony) about dried electrolytics maybe causing the problem. However, I spoke to the chap in the US who said that when the 8032 left America it had a rock-steady screen... Since I left the big cap in place, it can only be the transformer which is causing the wobble - can't it? I genuinely don't know. That's the only part I've swapped in the new 8032. Could a flakey transformer be making the screen wobble? How do transformers go flakey anyway, if indeed they *can* co flakey? Or is the US chap telling porkies? Thanks, again, in advance. -- Cheers, Ade. Be where it's at, B-Racing! http://b-racing.co.uk

25 years

11
27
0 0

Half-duplex VT420?

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 9, Iggy Drougge wrote: > But if I have a toasted line driver, wouldn't that strike both inbound and > outbound data? Nope...many RS232 interfaces are built with 1488 driver and 1489 receiver chips. Nowadays the Maxim MAX232 (and family) chips are popular for that sort of thing since they only require +5V...but I'll bet the VT420 uses 1488/1489 chips. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

2
1
0 0

Looking for documentation/info

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

I have a Unisys 486 computer. It's a SX-25, with a DX-50 in it also. It's mfg date is 10/92, and style number is SG-3102-425. It's "plateau" is labelled Evaluation Unit A. That would explain the XXXX in the FCC ID field... On the motherboard itself, it has a sticker with... 43611896-000 PW300 486SX/25 9240 AVEX ...while near the 30-pin memory, printed on the board is... UNISYS PW2 300/486 PWBA 43188028-000 Does anyone know where I can find out what the jumpers do on this board? Or other specs for it? I though I heard someone mention dual processor WRT this board, but I doubt it. There is also a smaller LIF socket next to the 2 LIF processor sockets. IIRC, that is for a 487 math co-processor... --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818

25 years

4
3
0 0

Free terminal

by optimus＠canit.se

I found this on USENET. Interesting? Mon, 08 Oct 2001 20:36:40 comp.sys.atari.st Thread 37 of 38 Lines 10 Free Terminal No responses DAVID L. ORMAND <dlormand(a)aztec.asu.edu> at Arizona State University Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st I know this isn't quite the forum for this, but maybe there are old computer types out there (mainframe hobbyists?) who would be interested. I've rescued a practically new-in-box Visual 50, which is an ASCII RS232 terminal with your classic green CRT look. It handles VT52 and ADM3A protocols. Includes operator's and maintenance manuals (with schematics!). I've tried it out and it works fine. I don't want anything but the shipping to a good home >from Tucson, 85711. -- En ligne avec Thor 2.6a. About 15 years ago(in 1984), I played many time HYDLIDE like monkey's self- acting! HaHaHa!! Here in Nippon(Japan), many many MSX Freak played HYDLIDE 1/2/3 on MSX1/2. Perhaps, also you like HYDLIDE series!!! K. Ikeda, MSX-Print

25 years

1
0
0 0

Still looking

by dittman＠dittman.net

> > The 21064 should work in a PC64 and the 21164 should work in either an > > EB164 or PC164. I've got extra PC64, EB164, and PC164 motherboards but > > you're overseas so finding one nearer to you would probably be cheaper. > > Do you know where I could find some docs that I could check to see if my > Alpha chips will work with these boards? I downloaded Digital/Compaq docs, > but can't find any informoation that confirms that these chips will work > with the boards you mention. The motherboard manuals were on the Digital website. They have probably moved around since I looked at them last. I'll see if I have the PDF files stuck somewhere. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

2
1
0 0

Looking for documentation/info

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

!From: John Ruschmeyer [mailto:jruschme@Mac.com] ! !> From: David Woyciesjes <DAW(a)yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu> !> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:49:55 -0400 !> !> I have a Unisys 486 computer. It's a SX-25, with a DX-50 in it also. !> It's mfg date is 10/92, and style number is SG-3102-425. !>t's "plateau" is !> labelled Evaluation Unit A. That would explain the XXXX in the FCC ID !> field... !> On the motherboard itself, it has a sticker with... !> 43611896-000 !> PW300 486SX/25 !> 9240 AVEX ! !Sounds like a 486SX/25 system upgraded to a DX2/50 with an !OverDrive chip. Close. But they are both regular 486 processors. 486SX/25 & 486DX2/50 !> ...while near the 30-pin memory, printed on the board is... !> UNISYS !> PW2 300/486 !> PWBA 43188028-000 !> !> Does anyone know where I can find out what the jumpers do on !> this board? Or other specs for it? I though I heard someone !> mention dual processor WRT this board, but I doubt it. There !> is also a smaller LIF socket next to the 2 LIF !> processor sockets. IIRC, that is for a 487 math co-processor... ! !I doubt that its for a 487... I almost wonder if this was some kind of !386/486 board. Well, it's a 15x15 pin socket, similar to the 17x17 socket for the 486 processors... If only I had the docs... I'd like to find out how fast I can push this board... --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818

25 years

2
1
0 0

need some advice on some VAX boards ...

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 4, Ethan Dicks wrote: > I thought that it specifically _was_ the -1. I _think_ I have a DEC- > badged RD-32 (ST-252-1) from a Pro380 VAX 8530 console, but I might > be mistaken. Maybe they got what they could get in later years. Probably so. > > The ST251 had an average access time of 40ms (if memory serves) and > > the ST251-1 was 28.5ms. > > That sounds right. Stepper motor vs. voice coil. (The ST-225 was > something horrible like 65ms or more; I used to think seek-time didn't > matter much on a micro, but when I went from 65ms to 28 on my Amiga, > _wow_!) The ST251-1 is a stepper drive also, believe it or not. They actually built a stepper positioner that achieved 28.5ms. Back when it was new I heard something about them having patented it or something. The ST225 was indeed 65ms...scary slow. It made a great distinctive "peep-peep" sound, though...which I liked even more than the [still rather cool] "chirp-chirp" sound of the ST251 and ST251-1. :-) I believe the first voice-coil drvie in that family was the ST-4096, but I'm not positive of that. That was one nice drive. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

3
2
0 0

Oddball memory (?) sticks....

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

Another 'whats-it' question here. I have two kinds of, what look like 72-pin memory... The first is only 64 pin, has 8 chips (AAA1M300J-08 NMBS 9122), with an empty spot for a 9th chip. Printed on the back - "1X964P A (in a circle) 9115". Apparently made by Microtech. My guess is it's 1MB non-parity memory, but I don't know what uses 64 pin memory sticks. I have 4 of these sticks. The second is 68 pin, 2 chip memory. Printed on the back, they're made in 1994, in the USA, by Cubig Inc. Model number (I think) of VM512K. 512KB memory sticks? Have 3 of them... Anyone have an idea what these are, and what they're for? --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818

25 years

9
12
0 0

Hard Drives

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

Well sice this is not a PC centric group we may not be the best place for advice. However... JTS was a short lived supplier is low cost IDE drives and were noted for high failure rates though there were the occasional decent one in the pack. They were also very slow compared to the better WD, Seagate, Quantum and Maxtor. Oh, JTS disappeared withing two years after they show up. Allison -----Original Message----- From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> Date: Sunday, October 07, 2001 6:43 PM Subject: Re: Hard Drives >On Oct 7, 16:50, ajp166 wrote: >> Beats me what that drive is. This is a group for hardware over 10 years >> old. >> If it is that old you likely going to be fixing it yourself. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CByrd87043(a)aol.com <CByrd87043(a)aol.com> >> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> >> Date: Sunday, October 07, 2001 3:48 PM >> Subject: Hard Drives >> >> >> >I have a Hard Drive model P1200-2af. I need to know where can I send it >> to >> >get it fix or replace. It just stop working. > >It's a nothing-special 1.2GB IDE drive with a bad reputation, made by JTS. > JTS are no more, so the only likely option is to replace it with a >Seagate, WD, or whatever. > >JTS were famous for, amongst other things, buying part of Atari from the >Tramiel family, laying off a lot of staff, and then selling it to Hasbro >shortly after being de-listed by the stock exchange and shortly before >going bust in 1998. > >-- >Pete Peter Turnbull > Network Manager > University of York

25 years

3
2
0 0

Osborne OCC1

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

Joe wrote: > One of mine has a MODEM but I've never tried to use it. Does anyone > still support 1200 baud? The ZX-TEAM Mailbox supports 300-14400 baud ;>) Glen 0/0

25 years

5
4
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by dittman＠dittman.net

> I was not a RS user at the time and it's quite possible that the rumors I heard > regarding the M1 and those about the M3 were geting mixed together. I wasn't > even aware that there wasn't a two-sided option on the stock model 3. The third-party controllers were most popular on the Model 1, since the stock FDC was SD. There were a few third-party controllers for the Model III and the early Model 4, but they weren't as popular as the 1793 was more capable. The stock Model 1 FDC also had reliability problems that lead to third-party data separator plug-in circuits. The only Model 1/III/4 that came stock with DS drives was the 4D. Any other DS setup was third-party. The stock III/4 controllers (both the add-on in the III and early 4 and the built-in on the gate-array 4) had no problems with DS drives. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

4
12
0 0

IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk wrote: > Yes, stupid isn't it. I've some across programs where the > help files for > installation are compressed on the CD-ROM, and thus can only be read > after installation. I wonder which genius came up with that idea. This is not terribly clever :-) > Ditto for putting hardware docs in machine-readable form > only. The time you _need_ those documents (as opposed > to just wanting a bit of light > reading) is when the machine won't boot.... Apart from the word "only" above, I humbly disagree. I have less than perhaps 300 paper manuals and printsets in all (and a fair proportion of those are non-technical Owner's Manuals and the like). Electronic manuals are a godsend for those of us who are severely restricted space-wise. Add to that all the scans of manuals and printsets that I can now find on the net, and I think that electronic manuals are terrific. I don't expect to read my manual on the Rainbow that I am repairing ... that's what the PC or laptop is for! > And a lot of modern manuals, even when you've figured out how to read > them do not contain the information that I would need. Not > even what I > would consider to be 'basic' information, like pinouts and > data formats. True but probably understandable these days. Things change so rapidly that there is no time to generate the manual. The schematics will exist somewhere (although getting hold of them will be difficult for an outsider for the usual reasons of commercial sensitivity) but documentation is usually sketchy at best. Things may be a little different in the consumer arena, but the most I've been able to find have been the TV manuals in the RTSG (or whatever it's called ... my current TV came with a five year guarantee and the previous one was a Decca series 80 chassis that was already old when I got it ... must be 10 years since I've needed to pop into a library to consult that book!). Antonio

25 years

2
1
0 0

IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof

by Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com

ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk wrote: > If I was being totally honest, I would probably admit that there are > times where board-swapping makes sense. Not _all the time_, though... > There are certainly times when component level repair make financial > sense (even when you consider the time taken to replace the > component), > and is also the fastest way to get the machine working again. I cannot think of too many cases (at least in our current machine room - or indeed anywhere else I have been) where a repair is better for either the customer or the repairer. If I look at the routers and switches in our racks, the PSUs swap out, the fan tray swaps out and all of the cards swap out. The backplane and switching fabrics are a little harder - but not much. Replacing a card is the work of moments and will be much cheaper for the customer (in terms of down time) and the supplier (in terms of the amount of training needed by the FE). Even five to ten years ago (the times of the VAX 4000 and VAX 6000) I expect that the same economics would have applied. In fact, I believe that the machines were designed to keep MTTR low (and MTBF high !). You would have to go back to the early eighties, the days of the VAX-11/7xx and the VAX 86xx, to find FEs fixing components on site. In those days machines cost a great deal more and people (even highly trained people) cost a great deal less. Now once the card has been pulled and returned to base, then it is probably worthwhile having a repair line where someone with the appropriate skills can find the fault and fix it. Obviously if it costs more to do this than it does to simply use brand new boards as swap-ins, then even this repair won't be done. This is not to say that I won't fix the washing machine or the TV myself once they go out of waranty (but even there it was cheaper to get a new drain pump than try to repair the broken one!) > No, what worries me is that people are not being taught about > component-level design and repair any more (design and repair > are not the same thing, of course). I too am concerned about that sort of dumbing down. At least in those courses where it is appropriate. OTOH it seems perfectly reasonable to me that *most* people could care less about how their computer works - after all most people seem to be that way about their TV, car, DVD etc. I, for one, do not particularly enjoy plumbing, for example. > > replacement modules. People like Tony are few and far between. > > Probably because very few employers want people like me.... Economics again. Employers only need one of you for every N field service engineers. Your kind of skills cost money ... and if they don't you aren't doing the rest of us any favours - stop it :-) Antonio

25 years

3
2
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by philpem＠bigfoot.com

On 7 Oct 2001 1:36:56 +0100 "Iggy Drougge" <optimus(a)canit.se> said: > Philip Pemberton skrev: > >I've got two Western Design Center W65SC02s (14MHz >6502s! Woohoo!) to play > >with, plus a Synertek SY6502A (the 2MHz one), two W65SC22s (10MHz WDC 6502s) > >and two Synertek 6522s (1MHz). > 14 MHz? You're kidding! That's criminally fast! I kid you not! Go to www.6502.org, grab the datasheet for the W65SC02 and look at page 43. For $4, it's bloody good value. Anyone care to start another bulk-buy? Maybe Mike Nabarezny (sp?), webmaster of 6502.org and the guy who did the original 6502 Bulk Order would care to do another one? > > 2) Has anyone got a schematic for a fairly half-decent 16-colour (or > >better) video card that can be modified to work on a 6502? I've had a look > >at the NASCOM schematics but I've heard Bad Things(tm) about the NASCOM > >video system. Aparrently Gemini and a few others produced colour video cards > >for the NASCOM. Anyone got schematics for these? Graphics would also be nice > >(the NASCOM video system is text only). > Tony mentioned teletext chips a few days ago. Don't know if those perhaps are > only 8-colour, though. Tony? I've got an SAA5050. Anyone know how to use it without the SAA5020 timing generator? I've also got a Microvitec Cub 653 monitor. TTL input, composite sync. How can I get Csync from Vsync and Hsync? > > BTW, I'd like to avoid obsolete components if that's at all possible. > >I've got a Hitachi HD6845 but if the 40-odd page datasheet is anything to go > >by, it's a real dog to use... And it only works in monochrome. I have got a > >MOS Tech 6568(?) VIC-II, the same one used in the UK Commodore 64. The PSU > >for this C64 is fried, took out some of the support components with it. > The VIC is quite well-documented, and it would certainly be interesting to see > it in a non-C64, 14 MHz 6502 system. =) I doubt a VIC will run at 14MHz. Later. -- Phil. philpem(a)bigfoot.com http://www.philpem.f9.co.uk/

25 years

2
1
0 0

CBM8032 - wobbly screen (The saga continues)

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 8, 13:36, Jan Koller wrote: > > > Anneal - is that where you heat it up & hit it with a hammer? Or do you > > just heat it up and let it cool again? I forget now... It's been a long > > long time since I had any metalwork lessons. > > Heat to cherry red, then cool very slowly, often covered in lime, IIRC, > to hold the heat in. The very slow cooling keeps the metal soft, vs > cooling quickly ( quenching ) to harden. For mild steel, yes. You need to let it "soak" in the heat for about an hour per inch of thickness for it to be fully effective, too. For other metals, the temperatures vary and the slow cooling is usually unnecessary. In fact, for mumetal (as used for magnetic sheilding) the typical annealing temperature (to get the best magnetic properties in this case, rather than greatest malleability) is in the region of 1250 C to 1600 C (cherry red is about 800 C), and it's supposed to be quenched very rapidly to preserve the fine grain structure. For copper, the annealing temperature is between 400 C and 750 C depending on impurities and how it was hardened, and it doesn't make much difference whether it's quenched or not. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

1
0
0 0

question about vaxservers

by jfayre＠sun.com

Hello Everyone, I have a question: Someone on Ebay is selling a Vaxserver 3100 model 10. The question is: what is the difference betwen a vaxserver and a vaxstation 3100? This wil be my first vax system. Is this a good one to grab? I'm new to this, so any help would be apreciated.

25 years

3
2
0 0

question about vaxservers

by healyzh＠aracnet.com

> Hello Everyone, > I have a question: > Someone on Ebay is selling a Vaxserver 3100 model 10. > The question is: what is the difference betwen a vaxserver and a vaxstation > 3100? This wil be my first vax system. Is this a good one to grab? > > I'm new to this, so any help would be apreciated. The only *physical* difference is the lack of graphics hardware on the VAXserver, however, the more important difference is that a VAXserver requires different licenses than a VAXstation. This isn't that important if you're using a Hobbyist license though. Where this becomes important is if you've got a VAXstation with Commercial licenses and try to run it headless and without a keyboard (at which point the OS thinks it's running on a VAXserver). As for if it's a good system to grab, it's not a bad system, but there are better, and the external SCSI port is probably non-standard (requireing a special DEC cable. I'd personally recommend a VAXstation 4000/VLC as a first VAX. OTOH, the 3100m10 should hopefully go for next to nothing, which does make it attractive. Plus you can temporarily hook a CD-ROM up to the internal SCSI cable to load VMS. Zane

25 years

1
0
0 0

Still looking

by dittman＠dittman.net

> I am still looking for the Digital Alpha 233 MHz 21066A CPU. I am > interested > in buying it or swapping it for the following Alpha hardware: > > 1x Digital Alpha 233 MHz 21064BB CPU > 1x Digital Alpha 266 MHz 21164AA CPU Both of these are faster than the 21066A CPU. Perhaps you should look for a motherboard for either of these processors instead of the 21066A CPU. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

3
4
0 0

Still looking

by dittman＠dittman.net

> > > 1x Digital Alpha 233 MHz 21064BB CPU > > > 1x Digital Alpha 266 MHz 21164AA CPU > > > > Both of these are faster than the 21066A CPU. Perhaps you should look > > for a motherboard for either of these processors instead of the 21066A > > CPU. > > I did look for m/b for these, but they seem to be used only in > AlphaStations/Server. If you know of an OEM board that takes them I'd be > very interested to learn its part number/model name. The 21064 should work in a PC64 and the 21164 should work in either an EB164 or PC164. I've got extra PC64, EB164, and PC164 motherboards but you're overseas so finding one nearer to you would probably be cheaper. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

2
1
0 0

Pro350 Available.

by dittman＠dittman.net

I know of someone that has a Pro350 available. If anyone is interested, please let me know and I'll forward you their email address. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

1
0
0 0

Docs and software wanted for OPUS 300PM

by dan＠ekoan.com

This weekend I picked up an OPUS 300PM, which from what I can gather is a Fairchild Clipper computer on an ISA card. All I have is the card -- no manuals, documentation or software, so any pointers to further information on this card would be most welcome. The card is silkscreened with a date of 1987, so it is on-topic. Cheers, Dan

25 years

2
1
0 0

[Fwd: [swap] CPM Books]

by jrasite＠eoni.com

>From the LEM Swap list... Jim

25 years

1
0
0 0

DEC TK50-GA tape drive/ Windows 9x

by callwright＠earthlink.net

Hello All, I own a pair of DEC TK50-GA external SCSI tape drives which I'd like to use as storage on my PC (Windows 98). Can anyone tell me: 1. if this is possible 2. if possible, what hardware/software is required 3. source(s) of required hardware/software Kevin Wright Email: callwright(a)earthlink.net

25 years

3
2
0 0

In Search of RS/6000 POWERserver 930

by wilby98＠yahoo.com

I am looking for a RS/6000 POWERserver 930 or equivalent. So if there is anyone here in the Netherlands or a nearby country who is looking to give one away, please contact me at my email address. This would just be a hobby machine to add to my small collection of "old stuff" and learn a bit on the way. Bill S. Amsterdam, NL __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

25 years

1
0
0 0

Hard Drives

by fmc＠reanimators.org

"ajp166" <ajp166(a)bellatlantic.net> wrote: > However... JTS was a short lived supplier is low cost IDE drives and > were noted for high failure rates though there were the occasional > decent one in the pack. They were also very slow compared to > the better WD, Seagate, Quantum and Maxtor. Don't I also remember that JTS was flogging the notion (later used by Quantum "Bigfoot" drives) of building 5.25" hard drives well after everyone else was making 3.5" units? The idea(s) being that all those PC cases were being made with 5.25" drive bays that were going unused; and 5.25" platters could have more surface area than 3.5" ones, so you could get the same capacity with fewer heads and hence lower cost (and almost certainly lower performance, but who pays attention to disk drive performance at the low end?). -Frank McConnell

25 years

1
0
0 0

older SGI and Mac equipment available for free

by LFessen106＠aol.com

In a message dated Sat, 6 Oct 2001 4:56:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Dave McGuire <mcguire(a)neurotica.com> writes: > On October 6, LFessen106(a)aol.com wrote: > > Hey Dave, can you hold onto a Quadra for me? > > Sure, if you can grab it before I move...end of October... > > -Dave Cool! Actually I talked w/ Brian today who said he was coming up there tomorrow probably (definately this week). Anyhow, would you send it along with him? He said he'd bring it back for me earlier than I could get there to get it. BTW, I do plan on coming up to help. Just let me know when.

25 years

1
0
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 7, 22:36, Philip Pemberton wrote: > On 7 Oct 2001 1:36:56 +0100 "Iggy Drougge" <optimus(a)canit.se> said: > > Tony mentioned teletext chips a few days ago. Don't know if those perhaps > are > > only 8-colour, though. Tony? The SAA5050 is certainly only 8-colour (plus attributes like flashing) and as far as I know so are later teletext chips. > I've got an SAA5050. Anyone know how to use it without the SAA5020 timing > generator? Take a look at the circuit diagram for a BBC micro; it uses a 6845 for timing and an SAA5050 to generate the teletext screen mode. http://bbc.nvg.org/mirror/www.acorn.com/ftp/documents/circuits/ > I've also got a Microvitec Cub 653 monitor. TTL input, composite sync. How > can I get Csync from Vsync and Hsync? XOR them together; feed the unbuffered TTL outputs to a 74LS86 or similar, and buffer the output with a transistor. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

1
0
0 0

Hard Drives

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 7, 18:58, ajp166 wrote: > Well sice this is not a PC centric group we may not be the best place > for advice. > > However... JTS was a short lived supplier is low cost IDE drives and > were noted for high failure rates though there were the occasional > decent one in the pack. They were also very slow compared to > the better WD, Seagate, Quantum and Maxtor. They had some problems with master/slave selection as well. They made it to the list of "Worst Models Ever" at www.driveservice.com/bestwrst.htm with "JTS any model". > Oh, JTS disappeared withing two years after they show up. That's a bit of an exaggeration :-) They were around for a while before they did the Atari deal (1996?), making drives from 1994, and went bust in 1998. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

1
0
0 0

older SGI and Mac equipment available for free

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 7, Full SCSI wrote: > Why are you selling the Mog Dave? While I'm quite attached to that truck, I don't drive it nearly enough...and frankly, I could really use the money. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

3
2
0 0

IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

> > Since "they never did provide BASIC" then there was *always* "no ROM > > BASIC." That's like stopping the machine with a message stating "no > > printer." Why not display something understandable to a common user, such > > as "no bootable device?" > > Because INT 18h doesn't check for bootable devices. It is the entry to > ROM BASIC. It may well be that the most common time that it is called is > from the bootstrap after both floppy and hard disk boots have failed, but > that doesn't mean it's the only time it can be called. Tony, are you simply being obstinate here, or didn't you see the above reference to "common user?" Do you think "common users" -- not to be disrespectful to plain old computer users -- read BIOS listings??? What I mean to say is: Suzy Six-pack, who ekes out a living typing up MS Word documents, doesn't know shit about the internals of the machine she uses. > Actually, one thing that really annoys me are error messages that don't > describe the real problem, but only the most likely cause. I need to know > waht's really going on so that I can fix it. Odd, that.... Yes, and even more odd is that you fail to see that "no bootable device" at power-up actually does describe the problem, whereas "no ROM BASIC" does not, since the system in question would never call INT 18h if a bootable device were available (unless some insane programmer called it, and I seriously doubt that you can show me a commercially available program which does this). Glen 0/0

25 years

11
18
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

From: Eric Dittman <dittman(a)dittman.net> >The third-party controllers were most popular on the Model 1, since the stock >FDC was SD. There were a few third-party controllers for the Model III and >the early Model 4, but they weren't as popular as the 1793 was more capable. >The stock Model 1 FDC also had reliability problems that lead to third-party >data separator plug-in circuits. Yep, the M1 data sep was the 1771 internal and that was at best terrible and WD would tell you that. That lead to the Piggyback card to at least add a decent data sep. The 1793 came later but was very desirable as the 35/40track Single sided FD100 or SA400 drives were tiny storage wise. Allison

25 years

1
0
0 0

Grappler+ printer interface

by philip＠flatland.com

I realise this may not be the best forum to ask this question, but the emulator newsgroups seem to be pretty much dead. I'm updating an Apple ][+ emulator that I wrote back in 1994. I would very much like to emulate a printer interface card, such as the Grappler+, but I never owned a printer for the Apple ][+ I still have at home, so I don't have a printer interface card that I can study. So...I was wondering if anyone on this mailing list happens to own an Apple ][ with a printer interface card like the Grappler+, who would be willing to dump the ROM(s) and provide me with details of the I/O locations used. I realise some of you may be against distributing ROM code on the basis of copyright (I personally feel that discontinued products don't deserve copyright protection, though I realise the law says otherwise). If nobody is willing to provide me with ROM code for a printer interface card, I'll settle for a description of the I/O locations and any other information you can give me on the operation of the printer interface card, and I'll write my own "clean room" version of the ROM instead. Regards, Philip

25 years

2
1
0 0

Hard Drives

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 7, 16:50, ajp166 wrote: > Beats me what that drive is. This is a group for hardware over 10 years > old. > If it is that old you likely going to be fixing it yourself. > -----Original Message----- > From: CByrd87043(a)aol.com <CByrd87043(a)aol.com> > To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> > Date: Sunday, October 07, 2001 3:48 PM > Subject: Hard Drives > > > >I have a Hard Drive model P1200-2af. I need to know where can I send it > to > >get it fix or replace. It just stop working. It's a nothing-special 1.2GB IDE drive with a bad reputation, made by JTS. JTS are no more, so the only likely option is to replace it with a Seagate, WD, or whatever. JTS were famous for, amongst other things, buying part of Atari from the Tramiel family, laying off a lot of staff, and then selling it to Hasbro shortly after being de-listed by the stock exchange and shortly before going bust in 1998. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

1
0
0 0

Hard Drives

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

Beats me what that drive is. This is a group for hardware over 10 years old. If it is that old you likely going to be fixing it yourself. Allison -----Original Message----- From: CByrd87043(a)aol.com <CByrd87043(a)aol.com> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> Date: Sunday, October 07, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: Hard Drives >I have a Hard Drive model P1200-2af. I need to know where can I send it to >get it fix or replace. It just stop working. >

25 years

2
1
0 0

DEC TK50-GA tape drive/ Windows 9x

by dittman＠dittman.net

> Now, it occurred to me that you may have thought "ohhh, DLT drive, 10 to 20 > GB per tape." and if that was the case I hate to disappoint you. You'd > would need to find a TZ89 rather than a TZ85. The 20GB uncompressed drive is the TZ88/DLT4000. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

1
0
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by dittman＠dittman.net

> > So now I'm left with two questions: > > 1) Has anyone got any source code for the WD1770? 6502 ASM, C, anything. > > The 1770 is pretty much compatible with the other Western Digital FDCs. > The TRS-80 model 4 uses the 1793 (very similar in software), and the > sources of LS-DOS 6.3.1 are on the web somewhere (Tim Mann's page?). > That's Z80 assembly language. The later (gate array) TRS-80 Model 4 systems used a 1773 FDC, which was compatible with the 1793. The 1770 and 1773 were compatible, differing only in the logic states of some of the lines, but it's been so long since I've used either I can't remember which pins were different. The 1770/1772/1773 had both the data separator and write precompensation built-in. They are 28 pin devices (the 1793 is a 40 pin device). -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

4
7
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by dittman＠dittman.net

> > The later (gate array) TRS-80 Model 4 systems used a 1773 FDC, which was > > Interesting. The older model 4s (like mine) have a 1793 -- the floppy > controller board is indentical to that in a model 3. I'd assumed they > used that board in the gate array versions as well. > > Maybe they did (in the early gate array machines), and then changed to > the 1773 for the last ones. I don't see any reason why that couldn't have > been done -- as you said the 1773 and 1793 are pretty much compatible. The early systems weren't gate array systems. The gate array Model 4 and 4P systems had the FDC and RS232 integrated on the mainboard. If you have a separate FDC and/or RS232 board then your mainboard is not a gate array model. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

2
1
0 0

ZX81 kits (was Re: Keep or assemble???)

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

> > The ULA does a lot more than handle the display ;>) > > CPU clock generation (which would be useful). Address decoding (which I'd > want to modify if I was changing the amount of RAM). Very interesting -- how much RAM are you talking about adding that you have to modify the address decoding? > > Of course not ;>) But a ZX81 kit is still faster than starting from > > scratch. > > Is it? It's not going to take long to wire-wrap a clock circuit and > address decoder, and stick in the Z80. It depends _very much_ on how much > of the ZX81 you want to use... Which in turn depends on what the intended use of the finished device is. Since I want a "general purpose" computer the ROM BASIC functions are very convenient, and fast if called directly. Other applications of the Z80 would not need this code so a quickie Z80 board would be fine. > > Try desoldering the RF modulator from a ZX81 board ;>) > > Well, I had never tried to do it before, so I grabbed a ZX81, What, do you have a pile of these? > unscrewed > the case and attacked it with soldering iron and sucker. > > What's the catch? In the US versions which have 3 thin wires, they sometimes become brittle and break. Tony (and others), a question: in your opinion, which microprocessor was the most well-designed (even if not implemented)? Glen 0/0

25 years

4
10
0 0

Hard Drives

by CByrd87043＠aol.com

I have a Hard Drive model P1200-2af. I need to know where can I send it to get it fix or replace. It just stop working.

25 years

1
0
0 0

6502 Source....

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 7, 17:14, Alex White wrote: > Hey all UK people - do you know of a source for 6502s (and related support > chips, such as the 6522) within the UK? Farnell still list the CMD version, G65SC02, catalogue number 562-750, and the Rockwell R65C102, cat.no. 388-488, though the Rockwell parts is listed as "available until stocks are exhausted". They also list several varieties of 6520, 6521, and a 6545 (Rockwell version of 6845 CRT controller), but I know of no suppliers for new 6522s. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

2
1
0 0

Is there a source for veroboard in the U.S.?

by erd_6502＠yahoo.com

I wanted to bang out a quick thing involving bussed lines (an LED display for a Dragon's Lair game, if you're curious). I thought it might be quick to do with veroboard as opposed to point-to-point wiring. I want to make a prototype before considering burning a board (since that's a weakness I have at the moment anyway - lack of knowledge about layout tools). The problem is that I haven't seen veroboard for sale in the States, only the U.K. and perhaps Western Europe. Here, we have lots of modular prototyping board, but it's not easy to use when you have a lot of parallel connections (like a data bus). Are there any sources on this side of the pond? If not, how much does a sheet of about 6"x9" cost? If it's too expensive to buy and ship, I have several square feet of plain blue perfboard I got from the Micro Center when they put all their hobbyist stuff on remainder, and I'll build it from scratch. I went to school in England in 1985 - New College, specifically, down the street from Blackwell's Books. I spent many hours there absorbing everything I could about hardware hacking (not having the budget to _buy_ the books - the Turf Tavern was closer to the gate ;-) I remember a couple books with do-it-yourself projects using veroboard. Now I wish I'd gotten more books and less beer (but it was _great_ beer) :-) Any veroboard pointers? Thanks, -ethan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

25 years

5
10
0 0

IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof

by acme_ent＠bellsouth.net

Tony Duell wrote: > Since they never did provide BASIC they had to make INT 18 do something > (remember an application program could, in theory, call that interrupt). > Since that interrupt should have entered ROM BASIC, the most sensible > thing to do was to print that there was no ROM BASIC and then halt the > CPU. Since "they never did provide BASIC" then there was *always* "no ROM BASIC." That's like stopping the machine with a message stating "no printer." Why not display something understandable to a common user, such as "no bootable device?" Glen 0/0

25 years

8
18
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by philpem＠bigfoot.com

On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 at 01:25:28 +0100 (BST), ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) said: > > BTW, I also need some info on the Intel 8271 disk controller - I've got two > > I would not do a new design using the 8271. The chip is fairly hard to > find now, and there are machines that _need_ them (like the old Acorn > Systems). OK, then. One 8271, starting bid $100 - just kidding :-) > In fact, I'd probably use one of the all-in-one PC floppy controller > chips unless there was a very good reason not to. Add a crystal and > perhaps some cable driver chips. That's all... Is "I don't know any suppliers for PC FDCs" a good reason? Farnell Electronics don't seem to sell them, nor do Maplins, Electrovalue, ESR Electronics or any other supplier I know. Care to tell me where I can get them? > > of these little devils and Intel's datasheet makes absolutely no sense at > > all. I've also got a Western Digital WD1770-PH 00-02 that I might be able to > > use instead. First of all, which is the better controller? The 8271 or the > > 1770? Also, is it possible to overclock a 1770 or an 8271 like you can a > > 1772? > > Oh, use the 1770. It does double density (MFM) for one thing (the 8271 is > single-density only). It also require many fewer support circuits I > think. OK, then. The 1770 it is. > The 1770 and 1772 are closely related (the difference being the step > rates the chips can produce). I would guess that the 1770 can be > overclocked, but I've never tried it. I think I'll keep it running at the normal speed (8MHz). But the machine will have a 16MHz oscillator and a divider, with a few jumper blocks for clock speed selection (8 and 16MHz for the FDC, 1, 2 or 4MHz for the 6502 and support circuitry). I've got two Western Design Center W65SC02s (14MHz 6502s! Woohoo!) to play with, plus a Synertek SY6502A (the 2MHz one), two W65SC22s (10MHz WDC 6502s) and two Synertek 6522s (1MHz). So now I'm left with two questions: 1) Has anyone got any source code for the WD1770? 6502 ASM, C, anything. 2) Has anyone got a schematic for a fairly half-decent 16-colour (or better) video card that can be modified to work on a 6502? I've had a look at the NASCOM schematics but I've heard Bad Things(tm) about the NASCOM video system. Aparrently Gemini and a few others produced colour video cards for the NASCOM. Anyone got schematics for these? Graphics would also be nice (the NASCOM video system is text only). BTW, I'd like to avoid obsolete components if that's at all possible. I've got a Hitachi HD6845 but if the 40-odd page datasheet is anything to go by, it's a real dog to use... And it only works in monochrome. I have got a MOS Tech 6568(?) VIC-II, the same one used in the UK Commodore 64. The PSU for this C64 is fried, took out some of the support components with it. TIA. -- Phil. philpem(a)bigfoot.com http://www.philpem.f9.co.uk/

25 years

3
3
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by dittman＠dittman.net

> The 1772 and 1770 were designed specifically for use with the 5-1/4" units, > though that's not necessarily what their use today may be. > > I've never seen the 1773 in the flesh, though I've got a data sheet somewhere > (though I've managed to hide it somewhere). The three chips are all similar, > though not identical, in that they have the same data/clock separator circuitr > and write precomp circuit. However, the 1773 lacks some signals that are on the > 1770/72, thereby rendering it less "dedicated" to 5-1/4" drives. The datasheet > did, IIRC, specifically indicate that they're all similar in commands, etc, > though the timing parameters differ somewhat in that the 1770 is slower than the > otherwise identical 1772 in terms of its step rate settings. If I could lay > hands on the 1770/2/3 datasheet, I could tell you which pins differ and in what > sense, but ... The 1773 is also dedicated to 5.25" drives. Your email jogged my memory, and indeed the difference between the 1770 and 1773 was a couple of different signals. I've used the exact same code on both of them. From a programming point of view they are the same. I don't think there was a version of the 1773 with the faster step rates like in the 1772. > If somebody's got a 1773 and wants a 1770, I'll happily swap 'em, just so I have > one in house. If you find a gate array TRS-80 Model 4 then you'd have your 1773. -- Eric Dittman dittman(a)dittman.net Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

25 years

2
1
0 0

ZX Spectrum internals (Was: ZX81 kits)

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Oct 7, 2:17, Iggy Drougge wrote: > >> >If it's another 40 pin chip, then that's the custom ULA chip that > >> >includes most of the glue logic. > >> > >> Is that like a lot of 74138s or something? > > >It's rather more than that (I assume that's the address decoder part, > >which is in the ULA). It also handles the DRAM timing, most of the video > >display, and so on. > > I thought one of the selling points of the Z80 was its built-in ability to > handle DRAM. But perhaps it's lacking the 6502's ability to easily share > memory with other devices by only doing memory accessing every second or > fourth cycle. The Z80's special ability in handling DRAM is merely the presence of an on-board counter which increments once in every instruction cycle, and which is output onto the address bus once per instruction. This is only part of the requirement, however (see below). The refresh counter means the chip is guaranteed to cycle through the addresses (with no omissions) in a given period. This is exactly what you need for DRAM refresh. Of course, if you have a video circuit accessing the same DRAM, it too will cycle through the address range (or part of it) and achieve the same end, so the Z80 refresh is only a useful bonus if you don't have video accessing your DRAM. Anyway, it's only a 7-bit counter, which is fine for 16Kbit DRAM but not for most 64Kb devices. The downside is that a Z80 uses the clock in a different way from a 6502. A 6502 does some things on one half of the clock cycle (like accessing memory to read instructions or read/write data) and other things (internal operations) on the other half cycle. During the half-cycle when it doesn't need memory access, it releases the bus, leaving it free for use by other devices (eg video). A Z80 uses successive cycles (of a faster clock) instead of alternate half-cycles for different purposes and there is no clock state when it's guaranteed not to be using the bus. However, there is one (whole) clock cycle when it doesn't need the bus, and that's the refresh period; it's just more complicated to decode that than to just use the phase of the clock (high or low) to enable your video access (or whatever). It's also less suitable than the 6502 since Z80 instruction cycles vary in length and therefore the interval between refresh cycles is not constant. The interval between successive half cycles of a 6502 clock is (usually!) constant. I said the refresh was only part of the requirement. That's because DRAM normally splits the address into two parts, row addresses and column addresses, to address a given cell in the memory matrix. Usually these two parts of the address are multiplexed onto the same pins of the IC. Therefore, on the first part of the memory access cycle, you put the row addresses on the pins and signal this to the DRAM with the /RAS (row address select) signal. The IC latches these address bits internally, and after some time period, you turn off /RAS, replace the row address bits with the column address, and apply the /CAS signal. Neither the Z80 nor the 6502 have any special feature to simplify this (unless you count the fact that you have two clock phases per memory address on a Z80). So in a Spectrum, ZX81, etc, the ULA takes care of the address multiplexing and RAS/CAS timing. > But what does glue logic really mean? Just slang for the assorted logic that does address decoding, signal buffering, RAS/CAS generation, etc. In a typical system with, let's say, ROM, RAM, processor, some I/O ports, perhaps a DMA device, each section that connects to the address/data bus (and perhaps the control bus too, if DMA is involved) would have its own set of buffer ICs, each being enabled only when the relevant section is accessing the bus. The glue logic includes all the decoding/multiplexing of the address and control signals. If you think of a system as CPU, RAM, ROM, I/O ports, then the glue logic is all the extra circuitry you need to "glue" them together into a working system. > Couldn't Sinclair have socketed the BASIC? It must have been a lot of work to > piggy-back it onto each imported Spectrum, unless the customers had to do it > by themselves. Sinclair never used sockets if they didn't have to, for reasons of both cost and reliability. If there was a special Sinclair-original ROM for Scandinavian countries, I would have expected that to be factory-fitted instead of the standard ROM. It's possible they retrofitted something like that -- it might be cheaper to piggyback a new ROM instead of removing the old one -- but I would guess that what you have is something done by the original owner, in order to have both systems. Sinclair would be most unlikely to fit something as extravegant as a switch. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

25 years

1
0
0 0

older SGI and Mac equipment available for free

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

Hey folks. I've got four or five SGI Personal Iris machines here...4D20, 4D25, and 4D35, in various configurations and in various states of operability. I also have three Macintosh Quadra 950s. I offer them for free to any interested party for pickup in Laurel, MD within the next two weeks or so. I am moving, and they need to go. In addition, there's a list of [non-free] stuff that I have available at http://www.neurotica.com/available.html. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

3
2
0 0

Found WANG boards

by optimus＠canit.se

While visiting my electronics shop, I found a collection of largish cards (circa 15?25 cm?) made by WANG. There were at least two video cards - one IBM mono emulator card and one low-res cards. There was another card with two BNCs and a switch, could be a grpaihcs card, too. There was a winchester controller as well, and some card which I couldn't identify. If anyone's really interested, I'll see how much he wants (probably very little, they're sold as scrap). -- En ligne avec Thor 2.6a. G? med i SUGA, Swedish Usergroup of Amiga! WWW: http://swedish.usergroup.amiga.tm/ BBS: 08-6582572, telnet sua.ath.cx, port 42512.

25 years

3
3
0 0

CBM8032 - wobbly screen (The saga continues)

by Innfogra＠aol.com

In a message dated 10/6/01 3:35:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ms(a)silke.rt.schwaben.de writes: > call "mu-Metal", which is a special alloy of steel and other things i > have long > forgotten but that make it EXPENSIVE. > It is magnetic, but not a good conductor, which make it ideal for > shielding magnetic > fields Mu metal should be easily scroungable. It is the shielding on old large graphic monitors, Convergent "N"gens and many other pieces of electronic gear. Often found around CRTs and CPUs. Tektronix used a lot of it. It is soft and usually a dull gray although sometimes silvery. Occasionally it shows a crystal type surface. It is magnetic and not a good conductor. It is expensive new. We got up to $5 per pound for it, scrap, at one time. Paxton Astoria, OR

25 years

1
0
0 0

Hardware races

by KenzieM＠sympatico.ca

On another list someone mentioned that a PDP11 ran at about the same speed as a 486-66. I don't have a 486-66 but do have a PDP11/34 in the garage so I suggested that if a 486-66 could be found we could have a race. I tested the capacitors on the weekend and they were OK, still need to test the RL01 drives and get them hooked up. >From the cables in the cabinet and the terminator on one of the drives I'm guessing that they are daisy chained. A few questions remain. What would be the best way to test the Power supply it is currently off the chassis, does it need to be connected for testing? Any suggestions for a fair race? Recent additions: Unisys PW2 (Unisys ICON NETWORK), Microcom (apple clone), SHARP PC4500 Collector of Vintage Computers (www.ncf.ca/~ba600)

25 years

4
9
0 0

6502 BASIC or Assembler and Intel 8271/WDC 1770 info req'd

by philpem＠bigfoot.com

Hi, I'm building myself a 6502-based single-board computer, with the aim of running it off a 4.8V NiMH or NiCad battery pack. But I've got a problem. I need a programming language for it. Aparrently there were many BASIC interpreters sold for the Synertek SYM-1 (aka SY-VIM-1), MOS KIM-1 and Rockwell AIM-65. Anyone know what happened to the companies that produced these? Ideally I'd like the source code for a 6502 BASIC interpreter, but binary code would be OK too. The SBC will communicate via a small LCD panel, RS232 (so I can hook it up to a "dumb terminal") and will have a hexadecimal keypad and an optional hard drive, too. Anyone care to make any suggestions (or submit some code)? BTW, I also need some info on the Intel 8271 disk controller - I've got two of these little devils and Intel's datasheet makes absolutely no sense at all. I've also got a Western Digital WD1770-PH 00-02 that I might be able to use instead. First of all, which is the better controller? The 8271 or the 1770? Also, is it possible to overclock a 1770 or an 8271 like you can a 1772? I'd love some schematics and/or some source code. I really don't fancy disassembling Acorn's 8271 DFS and Watford Electronics' 1770 DFS... Thanks. -- Phil. philpem(a)bigfoot.com http://www.philpem.f9.co.uk/

25 years

4
9
0 0

Restoring classic kits we built way-back-when

by erd_6502＠yahoo.com

We've had the ongoing debate of "build a ZX-81 kit or leave it in the box", but one aspect of classic kit building I have a question for the group about is, what about stuff that we built ourselves 10+ years ago that still works, but might need some touch-up. Specifically, I have several things (a TVT-6, a Cosmac Elf, a homemade arcade button panel for playing Space Invaders on a PET, a 2-char LED display for the PET, etc.) that I made when I was a teenager. They still work, so it's not a question of repair. It's an aesthetic thing - my soldering skills were much poorer when I was 13. I'm debating re-soldering these items (and risking breaking them) or leaving them the way they are a) because if it works, don't screw with it, and b) it's a snapshot of my own context in the greater historical framework. I took history and archaeology in school; I have a strong aversion to modernizing artifacts. When restoring pots, statues, mosaics, etc., an archaeologist tries to never restore an antiquity in a way that can't be reversed (they use water-soluable glue made from fish scales to move mosaic fragments, for example). Also, when modern materials are used, no attempt to make it resemble the ancient material is made - quite the opposite - it's plainly and intentionally modern looking so ever a casual observer can't mistake it for the missing original. When my advisor restored the bed of a large monochrome mosaic near Isthmia, he threw several modern coins into the concrete bed so that future excavators would know that it wasn't ancient concrete. So re-soldering my TVT-6 makes it look nice, but dilutes the fact that it was originally built in the 1970s, just as much as using modern ICs does. Do people have an opinion about this? Am I just stuck on the horns of a false dilemma? -ethan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

25 years

7
7
0 0

CBM8032 - wobbly screen (The saga continues)

by mythtech＠Mac.com

>4th attempt: Removed all tinfoil, started up with the lid open, no wobble. >The wobble appears progressively as the monitor approaches the transformer >(the lid down position). Knowing NOTHING about the unit you are working on... two things pop in my mind from my TV/VCR repair days. 1: Is it possible the controller on the back of the tube is loose? When you tilt the lid (and from what I gather, the tube with it) back into place, maybe the board is shifting from the change in weight position. 2: Is there a cable or wire that is getting pulled on when you close the lid? Maybe one of them has a bad solder joint, and the joint stays properly closed when the lid is open, but when closed, gets pulled (or pushed), and breaks the connection. Have you tried, while the unit is open, to jiggle any wires that might be effected (obviously, don't do them with your hands, use a non conductive spudger or similar tool... wouldn't want you to kill yourself by grabbing the wrong wire) Again, I know NOTHING about the unit you are working on, so these were just shots in the dark thinking maybe something will help. -chris <http://www.mythtech.net>

25 years

1
0
0 0

older SGI and Mac equipment available for free

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 6, LFessen106(a)aol.com wrote: > Hey Dave, can you hold onto a Quadra for me? Sure, if you can grab it before I move...end of October... -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

1
0
0 0

CBM8032 - wobbly screen (The saga continues)

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

What you need is Mumetal which is a MAGNETIC alloy. Lacking that distance helps. Having built numrous O'scopes over the years the problem of transformers radiating magnetic fields are well known to me. Allison -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Vickers <avickers(a)solutionengineers.com> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org> Date: Saturday, October 06, 2001 3:39 PM Subject: Re: CBM8032 - wobbly screen (The saga continues) >Curiouser and curiouser... > >Today, I happened to have the machine opened up to effect some keyboard >repairs (i.e. a jolly good clean up). Having successfuly removed all traces >of key bounce, non-working keys, etc., and feeling justifiably please with >myself, it occurred to me to try a couple of things WRT the wobbly screen. > >1st attempt: "build" some shielding out of aluminium foil to go around the >transformer. Which I did - all rough & ready stuff, with just a bit of >insulating tape over the transformer connections to make sure they didn't >short out. No effect - the screen wobbled its way along as ususal. > >2nd attempt: Same as above, but this time I made absolutely sure the tin >foil was earthed, by screwing it onto the chassis via one of the >transformer screws. Same effect as 1st attempt: FA. > >3rd attempt: Getting desparate now, I wrapped a load of tin foil around the >signal cables (having removed it from the transformer). Decided to leave >the lid up when I switched on and bingo! Steady as a rock (literally no >movement whatsoever. Refusing to get too excited, I carefully brought the >lid down (holding the signal cables so as not to let the tin foil touch the >circuit board - bah! The wobble returned. > >4th attempt: Removed all tinfoil, started up with the lid open, no wobble. >The wobble appears progressively as the monitor approaches the transformer >(the lid down position). > >5th attempt: Put a sheet of tinfoil over the whole of the bottom of the >monitor section. No effect - wobble remained. > >Clearly, therefore, the wobble is induced by the monitor. There must be a >fairly monster field coming off the transformer interfering with the >electron gun aiming circuit(s), or something like that. > >The question is: What *would* shield it? Do I need some thin steel or >copper, for example? Presumably, the shielding needs to be earthed (not >difficult, there's plenty of earth points around there. Or, would it be >easier to simply replace the big transformer with a smaller modern one? > >TIA! >-- >Cheers, Ade. >Be where it's at, B-Racing! >http://b-racing.co.uk >

25 years

1
0
0 0

older SGI and Mac equipment available for free

by LFessen106＠aol.com

In a message dated 10/06/2001 15:37:41, you wrote: > > Hey folks. I've got four or five SGI Personal Iris machines >here...4D20, 4D25, and 4D35, in various configurations and in various >states of operability. I also have three Macintosh Quadra 950s. I >offer them for free to any interested party for pickup in Laurel, MD >within the next two weeks or so. I am moving, and they need to go. Hey Dave, can you hold onto a Quadra for me? -Linc.

25 years

1
0
0 0

Free: Cabletron ST-500 thickwire:aui ethernet transceivers

by mvgslc＠earthlink.net

I think I already know the answer, but perhaps someone can make use of these in a really authentic LAN at home :) - free (you pay shipping from St. Louis, MO): small box of Cabletron ST-500 thickwire to aui ethernet transceivers, working when removed from service. There are currently 4 or 5 units in the box (more may show up shortly). I'll hold on to these till 15 October, then they will be recycled. Please email offlist soonest if of interest. Thanks! Mark mvgslc(a)earthlink.net

25 years

1
0
0 0

IBM ROM BASIC or lack thereof

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> >> Well, you must be the only person on this list who has got a sufficient amount >> of TTL chips available to repair any trivial function in your PC but not the > >That's a very worryign statement about the people on this list (not that >I believe it). Am I the only person still to _make_ things :-) Well for certain I have gobs of TTL for said reapirs and I do make things. Those things range from full blown systems down to SSB and CW transceivers for HF and VHF radio. >It's not easier for me. I have to go to get the replacement card, which >would take me a lot longer than actually changing the faulty component... :) Not the only one. Allison

25 years

2
1
0 0

Rebuilding the PDP 11/34 (2volts?)

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On October 6, Mike Kenzie wrote: > Found empty connectors on the M7891 and M8265 cards what would have > attached to these? The M7891 is a memory board...I believe that connector is for factory testing but I'm not sure about that. The M8265 is one of the pdp11/34a CPU boards. The connectors on them are for the cache and FPU options. -Dave -- Dave McGuire Laurel, MD

25 years

1
0
0 0

UNIVAC Core

by cswiger＠widomaker.com

Hi Gang - long time no type. I'm just looking for any insight or experience with a Sperry + Univac core memory card 90536-7128081-00 D Looks to be a later generation core module, lots of 14 pin dips with numbers like 7427, 7438, MC7524, 7502, 7503. card itself is 10.5" tall, 15" wide with 3 connectors along the bottom, each connector has 2 rows of 28 contacts (48 * 3 contacts in all) on .1" centers. This instance is in clean condition - I'd love to build an interface to it just for a crazy fun project. Chuck cswiger(a)widomaker.com

25 years

1
0
0 0

HP 9000/847S

by steven_j_robertson＠hotmail.com

DOH! I was mistaken. My machine is not a 847S, it's a 840S. I'll pay good money to see someone toss one of those :-) SteveRob >The classic Mac toss is even worse, with those tiny little machines, and >the >hefty handles, you can really get 'em flying. (Hmm... I'll have to try >this >eventually) > Zach > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

25 years

1
0
0 0

Twoflower says

by optimus＠canit.se

I found this brill note by Twoflower (a Triad member, I think) in a interview at http://www.c64.sk/ : CreamD: How do you feel about the party, what is your overall opinion? Twoflower: Overall it was a great party. Save for some small backlashes, like missing friends which said they would show up, it was hilariously funny to be there meeting everyone. Actually, it's kind of easy to forget how much such an event means for the social bonds of the scene, but when you're there, it really gets a good hold on you. Scene parties, no matter how small, are important for the scene, its structure, its competition and its friendship and should always be pushed for - but it's also important to remember what these meetings are about - and what they're not about. CreamD: I don't understand. What do you mean by that what they are and aren't about? Twoflower: Meetings are about the scene, the living, creative scene of which we consist. It's not about retro feelings, of nostalgia or something like that, but about creating the bonds and feelings for the scene I described above and pushing the efforts on what you can do with 8-bit computers further - not back to the 80'ies. The scene, and the parties, must first and foremost be focused on the scene, for the scene and by the scene - enough said! :-) I think that sums up my views on emulation and the "retro" trend in a very neat package. Retro is about what has been, not about what is. -- En ligne avec Thor 2.6a. VIRGO (Aug 23 - Sept 22) You are the logical type and hate disorder. This nitpicking is sickening to your friends. You are cold and unemotional and sometimes fall asleep while making love. Virgos make good bus drivers.

25 years

1
0
0 0

HP 9000/847S

by lance＠costanzo.net

don't forget the 286 pile event. a team gets 1 minute to throw 286's at least 10 feet and create the tallest pile. they took all the fun out of the mac toss. with those built in handles on the imac, its just too easy to score a "swish" into the dumpster at 50 paces. At 03:55 PM 10/5/01 +0300, you wrote: >>>Nearly broke my back when carrying it >>>up the stairs. >> Pull the power supplies and disk cages next time. > >No thanks, I consider it "work-out". Could be a part of classiccmp-olympics: >1) H50 up-the-stairs-and-back (also possible as a relay event) >2) downhill racing inside full-size rack cabinets >3) Fix the PDP relay-event (again). Each team member gets two minutes, > one (1) leaflet of the schematics and one (1) tool. Dropping the > screwdriver on fully loaded UNIBUS power distribution tracks leads > to disqualification. > >I'll shut up now. >-- >jht > > >

25 years

3
2
0 0

HP 9826/9836 computer battery pack

by rigdonj＠intellistar.net

A while back someone was asking about what the battery in the HP 9826/9836 was for. I replied that it was used for a RT clock and that if could also be used for shutting down the computer gracefully in the event of an AC power loss. Well, I finally found my manual for it. It's option # 050 and PN 98270 (cost $1515 in 1983). Now that I have the manual in hand I can give you exact answers to any questions about it. (FWIW I just picked up an 9826 that has this option in it this past weekend.) Joe

25 years

1
0
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb