Hello.
Is possible (ONLY possible by now) that I could obtain these equipment:
* 1 Serie/1 (little size serie)
* 1 IBM RT (with BSC connection to...)
* 1 IBM S/370 4361 with a couple of disks of 25 kilos, one 3279 console
and one 3174 terminals controller
* 1 PDP system (used for instrumentation controlling, unknown model yet)
* 1 CP/M S-100 system (unknown model yet)
* Software and Documentation
All items are stopped from two years ago. Some of them are stored in a great
general store of the company who wants get rid of them. With independence
of the conservation state of all the stuff. What preventions must I have
about
the management of these computers ? My panic comes about a possible
damage of the items in the moment of start up them.
I should agree any comments. Thanks and Greetings.
Sergio
> Yeah, even my wife enjoyed it!
Sadly, we don't get it in Europe... *sigh* Anyone got a taped
copy?
> So, the IMPs they built would be the first network interface,
> right? The precurser to the present-day NIC.
Well, no.. IMP's connected a local(-ish) network to the remote
(-ish) network, usually over a slow(-ish ;-) WAN link like a
56K switched circuit. You could see them as the first series
of protocol-converting gateways, though.
Werent they built by BBN, and based on PDP-11(/23's) with the
Fuzzball software load image?
--f
Damn it! I'm getting spammed at this address. This is the third in about
as many days. Did anyone else receive the above entitled spam?
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
In cleaning out some closets (moving my collection to storage in
order to prepare a condo for sale), I came across a bunch of things
I had forgotten I had...
A couple of RK05 drives
An RK02 (diablo) drive
backplane and front panel for 11/34
a couple of BA11-M boxes
a couple of BA11-VA boxes
my original spacewar control boxes (wired up to
a DR11-C) which we used on a GT42 at WPI
back in 1978
some MM11-DP core memory
a battery backup unit (I think it said H755 or H775)
a large cache of blank DEC 8" floppies, in the blue
DEC floppy boxes.
a couple of boxes of dual-high foundation cards for
wiring your own devices, at least one specific unibus
foundation module.
and I can't remember all the rest...
wheee...
Megan
Hi!
I'm new to this list and I was referred here by a gentleman from sunmanagers.
I have been looking for a few software packages for some time now and most of
these I was able to find from people on sunmanagers. However there are three
pieces of software that I still haven't been able to find, perhaps somebody
can help?
SunOS 4.1.4 Domestic Kit, this is the encryption addon for SunOS 4.1.4. I
already have the install media, so I only need the addon.
SunPC 4.2, I have a SunPC card for my SPARC 5 running Solaris 2.6, but I have
been looking high and low for the drivers... Can't seem to find them anywhere.
FastEthernet 1.0, I have a BigMac (be) based SBus card for my SunOS 4.1.4 box
and these drivers seem to be hard to find also. With the software CD there are
drivers for SunOS 4.x and I am looking for these.
If any of you have, or know somebody who has, any or all of these titles, I'd
very much appreciate hearing from you. Sun doesn't feel like helping me out
and I can understand that; It's just a little frustrating to have an _almost_
complete setup... =)
Anyway, thanks to everybody on beforehand and I just wanted to say that what
I've seen on this list so far, I think I'll enjoy it! =)
-Alex
I just received a Morrow DiskJockey 2D Mod B from Jim's Garage Sale
(Thanks Jim!) and I had a couple of quick questions:
There are two sets of switches on the board. What do those configure
and what are the settings?
There is a 2708 on the board labeled BV/2. Is this a disk BIOS or a
boot loader?
I'm hoping to use this in my Altair to drive a pair of 801s I've got in
a Lobo chasis. (My next questions will revolve around how do I get CP/M
to run, etc.)
I've ordered a manual from Herb Johnson but I figured I'd ask the
experts for a quicker answer.
Thanks in advance!
Erik S. Klein
>Hey all,
>Yesterday I obtained a Documation card reader, 600cpm, for the total cost
>of... *drumroll* $20! Anyone have docs?
>
It may not be useful but I have the Documation M200 card reader manual at
http://www.pdp8.net/pdp8cgi/query_docs/view.pl?id=168
David Gesswein
http://www.pdp8.net/ -- Run an old computer with blinkenlights.
> > I have a copy of Meridian's SuperLAT for Win9x/NT. They dropped
> > the product and are no longer supporting or developing it. Too
> > bad; it was helpful to have LAT to access LAT-based terminal
> > servers. It doesn't seem to work with Win2K/XP.
> Dunno about the legality of this, but: I do have Pathworks32
> which should work..
Which version? The version I have (V7.2) doesn't work with XP.
The LAT driver doesn't work with Win2K, IIRC.
> Personally, I use Reflection/X for terminal stuff, as it supports
> both the serial ports and network connections, including LAT and
> X11.. :)
I use Reflection for X, too, and the LAT driver didn't work
in Win2K.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
Eric,
(and others)
> I have a copy of Meridian's SuperLAT for Win9x/NT. They dropped
> the product and are no longer supporting or developing it. Too
> bad; it was helpful to have LAT to access LAT-based terminal
> servers. It doesn't seem to work with Win2K/XP.
Dunno about the legality of this, but: I do have Pathworks32
which should work..
Personally, I use Reflection/X for terminal stuff, as it supports
both the serial ports and network connections, including LAT and
X11.. :)
--f
> > The LT320 is a third-party plasma terminal. There are MMJ and
> > DB25 serial connectors, and LK201/401-compatible and AT-compatible
> > keyboard connectors. I use an LK401 with mine.
>
> Jerome Fine replies:
>
> I presume the LK201 and the LK401 are plug compatible?
Yes.
> Also, what are the actual differences and why do you prefer
> the LK401?
I prefer the LK401 as it has the legs to raise the back built-
in, and I have a couple of LK401 keyboards, and my LK201 died
a while back. I'm sure there are pictures of the two on the
web somewhere, but I'm not sure where.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
> I can get matching monitors, but don't think there is a keyboard/mouse
> available. I was wondering if you can power them up
> w/o keyboard/mouse, just box and monitor to verify basic operation,
> whether dead or alive.
You should be able to just plug a Terminal into the serial port.
Zane
> > I'm not sure what the legal issues are about Lat, though... I think
> > it is owned (or is it only marketed) by Meridian, ltd.
> I believe Meridian only marketed (and sublicensed) LAT from DEC, with
> DEC being its owner. DEC did most of its internal LAT code development,
> and Meridian did most of the 'external' versions, e.g. the stuff in
> PC-LAT, Cisco IOS's LAT code, and probably most others, given the
> cost of licensing it... twas cheaper to let them do it than to get
> your own license and do it... :)
I have a copy of Meridian's SuperLAT for Win9x/NT. They dropped
the product and are no longer supporting or developing it. Too
bad; it was helpful to have LAT to access LAT-based terminal
servers. It doesn't seem to work with Win2K/XP.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
>I believe Meridian only marketed (and sublicensed) LAT from DEC, with
>DEC being its owner. DEC did most of its internal LAT code development,
>and Meridian did most of the 'external' versions, e.g. the stuff in
>PC-LAT, Cisco IOS's LAT code, and probably most others, given the
>cost of licensing it... twas cheaper to let them do it than to get
>your own license and do it... :)
Makes sense... we still maintain the lat source for Tru64 unix...
I actually had a track bug through there a few years ago...
Megan
Rich,
Check the website www.aecsales.com, They have the exact parts you need by the
original manufacturer. When at the parts search page be sure to check the box
for "restrict search to items with exact prefix". They have been very helpful
finding obsolete parts for me.
Don
Tom Uban
308 Jefferson Street
Valparaiso, IN 46383
At 04:03 PM 9/23/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Tom Uban wrote:
>
> > Pat,
> >
> > How is your RL02 effort going? Are you done with my terminator yet?
>
>I haven't had much time to play with it lately. I'm pretty sure that it's
>either a bad controller or drive. I'll try to get your terminator sent
>back to you in the next couple days - could you send me your address again
>so I don't have to go looking for it?
>
>Thanks.
>
>-- Pat
I seem to remember that self-parking heads generally were not available on
the 10MB drives of Kaypro 10 vintage, so I did a little Googling and came up
with the following
(http://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v9n12/8_The_Kaypro_10_more_than_.php
) from CREATIVE COMPUTING VOL. 9, NO. 12 / DECEMBER 1983:
"A very important command is included in the Kaypro 10 system software.
SAFETY moves the read/write heads on the hard disk to the safe landing zone
on the disk. This must be done before turning the power off or the surface
of the hard disk may be damaged. The SAFETY command is invoked from the
command mode in CP/M."
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Maslin [mailto:donm@cts.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:37 PM
To: classiccmp
Subject: Re: Park heads when moving Kaypro 10?
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Glen Goodwin wrote:
> Hi --
>
> Thanks to Don Maslin I'll soon have a set of reload diskettes for my
Kaypro
> 10, and I plan to bring it from home to my shop to do the reload.
>
> Is there a "park" or "ship" command I need to run before transporting the
> unit, so as not to damage the hard drive?
IIRC, it is built into the operating system and when the HD LED goes
out, the heads have been parked.
- don
> TIA --
>
> Glen
> 0/0
Megan wrote:
[pay attention folks, I actually got the addressing right this
time *grin*]
> I'm not sure what the legal issues are about Lat, though... I think
> it is owned (or is it only marketed) by Meridian, ltd.
I believe Meridian only marketed (and sublicensed) LAT from DEC, with
DEC being its owner. DEC did most of its internal LAT code development,
and Meridian did most of the 'external' versions, e.g. the stuff in
PC-LAT, Cisco IOS's LAT code, and probably most others, given the
cost of licensing it... twas cheaper to let them do it than to get
your own license and do it... :)
(this from memory and various readings on the Net)
--f
Okay, I've seen a picture of a PDP-8/L and the switches are
correct. But someone went and replaced the front panel on
it so it is dark lettering on a white background, with no
company logo...
Darn...
Megan
>It could be what's referred to as a MARS (Memory Address and Register
>Status) panel. The only one of those I've ever seen was at our PDP8 FS
>lab in Parker Street. It's a full-height rack panel (same height as the
>8/E) with several rows of lights for PC/AC/MQ/etc.
The front panel consists of the following
EA MA INST
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
MB F E D WC CA B
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Link AC Ion Par Prot Run
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
POWER | paddle switches
SWITCH
- - - - -
The boards hang from the backplane (which is really grimey... can
someone suggest how to clean it?) and are reachable from under
the chassis:
Front panel end
============================
M220 M220 M113 M111
M220 M220 M700 M700
M220 M220 M216 M115
M220 M220 M114 M310
M220 M220 M216 M310
M220 M220 M111 M310
M617 M617 M216 M310
M617 M617 M115 M160
M160 M160 M119 ----
M115 M216 M117 ----
M160 M111 M115 M113
M160 M113 M117 M111
M115 M119 M113 M310
---- ---- M113 M310
fan ---- ---- ---- M216
side ---- ---- M360 M617
G020 G020 G221 G221
G020 G020 G221 G221
G020 G020 memory
W025 W025 memory
W025 W025 memory
G228 G228 G221 G221
---- G228 G221 G221
G624 G624 G228 G228
G624 G624 M102 ----
G624 G624 M623 M623
G785 G785 M115 M623
---- ---- M660 M906
---- ---- M660 M906
---- ---- M707 M707
M516 ---- M706 M706
M516 ---- M452 20ma console connecter
---- ---- ---- ----
M111 ---- ---- ----
---- ---- ---- ----
============================
fuses, power cord
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: gentry at zk3.dec.com (work) |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | mbg at world.std.com (home) |
| Hewlett Packard | (s/ at /@/) |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Unfortunately, I never had access to DECnet/Ultrix... that was done
in a different group. I don't think it was ever updated for later
versions of Ultrix. It may still just run, though. I think the
last version of it was V4.2.
I'm not sure what the legal issues are about Lat, though... I think
it is owned (or is it only marketed) by Meridian, ltd.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: gentry at zk3.dec.com (work) |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | mbg at world.std.com (home) |
| Hewlett Packard | (s/ at /@/) |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
FYI: I have a lot of docs on Z-80 and some of the related hardware like the real-time-clock-thingy. I haven't searched the net to see if these are already readily availible or not. If they aren't availible on the 'net or incomplete I will gladly scan mine in if someone is interested.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Beaudry [mailto:r_beaudry@hotmail.com]
Sent: 10 October 2002 04:41
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Software for Orion Unilab II??
Hello all,
As part of a recent eBay win, I acquired an Orion Instruments Unilab II. I
have cables/software for the Rockwell 65/11EAB, and am looking for
cables/software for any other processor, especially the 1802, Z-80, 8080,
8088. If anyone has software available, and cabling diagrams, please let me
know! I have complete docs available, as well as the software for the
65/11EAB... I'd also be willing to write out a cable diagram for the
65/11EAB.
Thanks!
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
*sigh*
OK, sorry folks.. I'll give it up for t'nite and get some sleep,
that might keep me from misdirecting even more email...
(if anyone happens to HAVE the stuff mentioned, pse contact me
off-list..)
--fred (*bonk*bonk*bonk*)
Megan,
Yay, all the VAXen are now upstairs.. took a while, too :)
I was playing with the DECserver 200.. works nicely, I have three
"terminals" connected to it; a VT420 as "console", my Compaq AP400
workstation, and the serial port of the DEC VXT2000. The other
ports are connected to the console ports of all the VAX and PDP11
machines... works like a charm.
Also, I am able to open a DECterm LAT session to the services defined
above (the console ports are all listed as LAT services).
Question: do you have access to DECnet-for-Ultrix, or whatever provided
Ultrix systems with LAT support? Cant find it, and it MUST be around
somewhere, right?
cheers,
Fred
>Well, the PDP8/e has 2 rows of lights (Address, Data) on the panel too...
>Or is that not what you meant.
I'm familiar with the 8/E, I have one (and a LAB-8/E, too). This has
more rows of lights than an 8/E,F,M. I don't have it in front of me,
but I'm sure it had like 4 rows of lights (like an 8/I,L) and no
rotary switch.
>What boards are in it (M-numbers, etc)? That would help identify it, I
>think.
Of course... that would be simple... <grin> That is my next step...
Megan
Just today I got ahold of:
A front panel (just the silk-screened plastic) for a pdp-8/m
A front panel (silk-screened plastic) for a pdp-12
a pdp-8/e backplane
an asr-33
a pdp-8 of some sort in a 10.5" chassis. The reason I'm
not sure which one it is is because the silk-screened
front panel had been removed and replaced with
a white-colored panel by an organization from
which the prior owner had obtained the machine.
It has the paddle-type switches like I've seen on
pdp-8/e,f,m, but the address/data lights like on
a pdp-8/i,l.
Any thoughts, anyone?
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: gentry at zk3.dec.com (work) |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | mbg at world.std.com (home) |
| Hewlett Packard | (s/ at /@/) |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Hey all,
Yesterday I obtained a Documation card reader, 600cpm, for the total cost
of... *drumroll* $20! Anyone have docs?
WOOOHOOO!
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
Hi
There really isn't much danger if the machine isn't
moved. The heads are really quite smooth and landing
doesn't cause any significant issues. The problem
happens because the back edge of the head is very
sharp. If the surface back rotates, just a tiny amount,
this back edge will dig into the surface.
Some of the early drives had an issue because of motor
cogging. This would cause the disk to back rotate a
little on stopping. The early fix for this was to
put a one way brake on the spindles.
Dwight
>From: "Glen Goodwin" <acme_ent(a)bellsouth.net>
>
>Thanks, Bob. I've been using this system off and on for a couple of years,
>and it never occurred to me that I had to park the heads before each
>power-down. Apparently there hasn't been any damage as a result, but I'll
>start doing it . . .
>
>Glen
>0/0
>
>> From: Feldman, Robert <Robert_Feldman(a)jdedwards.com>
>> To: 'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org'
>> Subject: RE: Park heads when moving Kaypro 10?
>> Date: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:33 PM
>>
>> I seem to remember that self-parking heads generally were not available
>on
>> the 10MB drives of Kaypro 10 vintage, so I did a little Googling and came
>up
>> with the following
>>
>(http://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v9n12/8_The_Kaypro_10_more_than_.php
>
>> ) from CREATIVE COMPUTING VOL. 9, NO. 12 / DECEMBER 1983:
>>
>> "A very important command is included in the Kaypro 10 system software.
>> SAFETY moves the read/write heads on the hard disk to the safe landing
>zone
>> on the disk. This must be done before turning the power off or the
>surface
>> of the hard disk may be damaged. The SAFETY command is invoked from the
>> command mode in CP/M."
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Don Maslin [mailto:donm@cts.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:37 PM
>> To: classiccmp
>> Subject: Re: Park heads when moving Kaypro 10?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Glen Goodwin wrote:
>>
>> > Hi --
>> >
>> > Thanks to Don Maslin I'll soon have a set of reload diskettes for my
>> Kaypro
>> > 10, and I plan to bring it from home to my shop to do the reload.
>> >
>> > Is there a "park" or "ship" command I need to run before transporting
>the
>> > unit, so as not to damage the hard drive?
>>
>> IIRC, it is built into the operating system and when the HD LED goes
>> out, the heads have been parked.
>> - don
>>
>> > TIA --
>> >
>> > Glen
>> > 0/0
>
Thanks, Bob. I've been using this system off and on for a couple of years,
and it never occurred to me that I had to park the heads before each
power-down. Apparently there hasn't been any damage as a result, but I'll
start doing it . . .
Glen
0/0
> From: Feldman, Robert <Robert_Feldman(a)jdedwards.com>
> To: 'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org'
> Subject: RE: Park heads when moving Kaypro 10?
> Date: Thursday, October 10, 2002 12:33 PM
>
> I seem to remember that self-parking heads generally were not available
on
> the 10MB drives of Kaypro 10 vintage, so I did a little Googling and came
up
> with the following
>
(http://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v9n12/8_The_Kaypro_10_more_than_.php
> ) from CREATIVE COMPUTING VOL. 9, NO. 12 / DECEMBER 1983:
>
> "A very important command is included in the Kaypro 10 system software.
> SAFETY moves the read/write heads on the hard disk to the safe landing
zone
> on the disk. This must be done before turning the power off or the
surface
> of the hard disk may be damaged. The SAFETY command is invoked from the
> command mode in CP/M."
>
> Bob
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Maslin [mailto:donm@cts.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:37 PM
> To: classiccmp
> Subject: Re: Park heads when moving Kaypro 10?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Glen Goodwin wrote:
>
> > Hi --
> >
> > Thanks to Don Maslin I'll soon have a set of reload diskettes for my
> Kaypro
> > 10, and I plan to bring it from home to my shop to do the reload.
> >
> > Is there a "park" or "ship" command I need to run before transporting
the
> > unit, so as not to damage the hard drive?
>
> IIRC, it is built into the operating system and when the HD LED goes
> out, the heads have been parked.
> - don
>
> > TIA --
> >
> > Glen
> > 0/0
>From: "Ross Archer" <dogbert(a)mindless.com>
>
>Jerome H. Fine wrote:
>
>>>Jim Kearney wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I just had an email exchange with someone at Intel's Museum
>>>(http://www.intel.com/intel/intelis/museum/index.htm)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Jerome Fine replies:
>>
>>I am not sure why the information is so blatant in its
>>stupid attempt to ignore anything but Intel hardware
>>as far a anything that even look like a CPU chip, but
>>I guess it is an "Intel" museum.
>>
>>Of course, even now, Intel, in my opinion, is so far
>>behind from a technical point of view that is is a sad
>>comment just to read about the products that were
>>way behind, and still are, the excellence of other
>>products. No question that if the Pentium 4 had been
>>produced 10 years ago, it would have been a major
>>accomplishment.
>>
>Harsh! :)
>
>Guess it depends on what you mean by "far behind from a
>technical point of view."
>
>If you mean that x86 is an ugly legacy architecture, with
>not nearly enough registers, an instruction set which
>doesn't fit any reasonable pipeline, that's ugly to decode
>and not particularly orthogonal, that from purely technical
>reasons ought to have died a timely death in 1990,
>I'd have to agree.
>
>However, look at the performance. P4 is up near the
>top of the tree with the best RISC CPUs, which have
>the advantage of clean design and careful evolution.
>
>It surely takes a great deal of inspiration, creativity,
>and engineering talent to take something as ill-suited
>as the x86 architecture and get this kind of performance
>out of it. IMHO.
>
>In other words, making x86 fast must be a lot like
>getting Dumbo off the air. That ought to count as
>some kind of technical achievement. :)
---snip---
It is all done with smoke and mirrors. We do the same
here at AMD. The trick is to trade immediate execution
for known execution. The x86 code is translated to run
on a normal RISC engine. This means that the same tricks
on a normal RISC engine would most likely only buy about
a couple percent. It would only show up on the initial
load of the local cache. Once that is done, there is
really little difference.
Choices of pipeline depth, out of order execution, multiple
execution engines and such are just the fine tuning.
Intel, like us is just closer to the fine edge of what
the silicon process can do than anything tricky that
people like MIPS don't know about.
On a separate subject, I was very disappointed in the
Intel Museum. I'd thought it might be a good place to
research early software or early IC's. They have vary
little to offer to someone looking into this level of
stuff. Any local library has better references on this
kind of stuff ( and that isn't saying much ).
Dwight
I've just acquired an old Processor Technology SOL-20, and wonder if
anyone can advise on what video monitors are compatible with it (how
about an old IBM monochrome monitor - hercules compatible?), and what
the video connector on the back is (huge 1/2" dia. coax connector) - are
the mating connectors still available?
Second, I'm planning to use my PC sound card to record/playback in lieu
of a tape recorder (more reliable, less hassle), and wonder if anyone
has done the same with any success?
Thanks,
Ben
Hi folks:
I am new to the classiccmp list. I am an EE, and collect teletype machines
and HP test gear. My first computer was an RCA VIP 1802-based board. My
second was an Apple II. I got to play with some bigger stuff when I worked
at Cray Research a decade ago. But I digress.
I have also been collecting HP 85 computer stuff (85A, 85B, 3"/5"/8"
drives, roms, cards...), and I just got a 9915A, which is the industrial
version of the HP 85A (cpu-only in a half-rack box).
This 9915A does not have the tape drive (option 001), but has the operator
interface card (opt 002), which provides connectors for keyboard (DB-25F),
control (DB-15F), and video (BNC). The problem is, I have no keyboard,
monitor, or documentation of any sort for the 9915. I have most of the
useful 85 docs (short of the service manual), but nothing on the 9915.
Judging from the number of pcb connections to the keyboard connector, I'd
guess it uses a special parallel keyboard. I found reference to a 98155A
keyboard in a post about a 9915B (85B-compatible), and I presume that is
the same keyboard used with the A version.
I hooked the video up to the composite input of a tv, and saw text and
graphics when I ran the self-test from the front-panel buttons of the 9915.
The image seemed wider than the screen, and I'm not sure if is just my tv
adjustment, or if the video signal is not quite ntsc composite.
As for the control connector, I have no idea what that might be used for.
There is also a little board inside that has eight sockets, four of which
are populated with 2732 eproms. I am wondering whether this is part of the
cpu system, or if it is for embedded program storage like the programmable
rom card for the 85.
I presume that I can hook up a disk with an hp-ib card (and rom), so it
should be usable once I find a keyboard and appropriate monitor.
Anyone have any docs/info/tidbits/keyboard...?
thanks,
gil smith
;-----------------------------------------------------------
; vaux electronics, inc. 480-354-5556
; http://www.vauxelectronics.com (fax: 480-354-5558)
;-----------------------------------------------------------
> > I also have a HP 9915A in my possesion. Useless without keyboard and I also
> >have only documentation for the HP-85.
>
> Maybe I should back up. You do know that the 9915 will read HP-85 tapes
> and run the HP-85 programs don't you? The HP-85 is inteneded to be the
> developement system for the 9915.
Yes, but I also don't have a HP-85 and when I had a HP-85 I could run programs
on that instead of the 9915 :). But it's not really an important matter; I just
would like to use the 9915 sometime.
> > This sounds like they are absolute unobtainium today? I'd better start
> looking
> >for a HP-85, only they seem to want quite some money when I see them on
> >eBay :).
>
> Are you kidding? I've seen plenty of them go cheap. But you should really
> look for a lot better machine like the 87XM. They have a lot more memory and
> have a number of ROMs built-in. Take a look at <http://www.ebbsoft.com>. It
> has some comparisions of the various models.
Unobtainium was related to the development kit for eproms. As for HP-85's, I'm
located in Europe and haven't seen them much around here. Last one I remember
was on eBay.de and it went for quite some money (over EUR 100,-?), but I
haven't really looked that hard. I know there's a friend looking for a cheap
one for couple of years and I don't think he has already found one. But I got
offered one by e-mail, so maybe I'll have one soon :).
There's also an industrial surplus site that sometimes has them, but the last
time I when they had one, it was already reserved for someone else. They did
have some other nice industrial computers.
greetings,
Michiel
Here's what came in my last acquisition of HP gear that I started to unpack
today....
(2) HP 2113E cpu's in impeccably mint condition. They look refurbed (no dust
at all). The have been tested and run diags perfectly. Each one has 512KW,
DCPC, M.E.M., Mem Protect, and 2102E memory controllers
One has loader roms: 264x terminal, 7970 magtape {YES!}, 79xx Disc, CS80
disc
The other has loader roms: 264x terminal, 7970 magtape, 79xx Disc, and
7905/06/20/25 disc
Here's the cards between the two...
(2) 13037 disc subsystem interfaces
(2) TBG
(2) BACI 12966A
(2) Line Printer 26099A
(2) BUS I/O
(5) GRD TRU IN/OUT
and..... a 5060-6282 prototyping board!
Other items in the racks...
13037D disc subsystem controller (this one is MINT!)
13037B disc subsystem controller
12979B I/O expansion chassis & PS
(2) 7906D disc drives (both appear to be in extremely clean condition)
(2) standard cream colored HP racks
Much fun!
Jay West
> Anyone want to share their secret?
a piece of dry ice? My father used it to freeze the adhesive
for the linoleum floor in our kitchen, and the old squares
came right up...
maybe it will work better than the cold from the air can...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: gentry at zk3.dec.com (work) |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | mbg at world.std.com (home) |
| Hewlett Packard | (s/ at /@/) |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Hello all,
As part of a recent eBay win, I acquired an Orion Instruments Unilab II. I
have cables/software for the Rockwell 65/11EAB, and am looking for
cables/software for any other processor, especially the 1802, Z-80, 8080,
8088. If anyone has software available, and cabling diagrams, please let me
know! I have complete docs available, as well as the software for the
65/11EAB... I'd also be willing to write out a cable diagram for the
65/11EAB.
Thanks!
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>From: "Ross Archer" <archer(a)topnow.com>
>
>"Dwight K. Elvey" wrote:
>>
>> >From: "Ross Archer" <dogbert(a)mindless.com>
>> >
>> >Jerome H. Fine wrote:
>> >
>> >>>Jim Kearney wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>I just had an email exchange with someone at Intel's Museum
>> >>>(http://www.intel.com/intel/intelis/museum/index.htm)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>Jerome Fine replies:
>> >>
>> >>I am not sure why the information is so blatant in its
>> >>stupid attempt to ignore anything but Intel hardware
>> >>as far a anything that even look like a CPU chip, but
>> >>I guess it is an "Intel" museum.
>> >>
>> >>Of course, even now, Intel, in my opinion, is so far
>> >>behind from a technical point of view that is is a sad
>> >>comment just to read about the products that were
>> >>way behind, and still are, the excellence of other
>> >>products. No question that if the Pentium 4 had been
>> >>produced 10 years ago, it would have been a major
>> >>accomplishment.
>> >>
>> >Harsh! :)
>> >
>> >Guess it depends on what you mean by "far behind from a
>> >technical point of view."
>> >
>> >If you mean that x86 is an ugly legacy architecture, with
>> >not nearly enough registers, an instruction set which
>> >doesn't fit any reasonable pipeline, that's ugly to decode
>> >and not particularly orthogonal, that from purely technical
>> >reasons ought to have died a timely death in 1990,
>> >I'd have to agree.
>> >
>> >However, look at the performance. P4 is up near the
>> >top of the tree with the best RISC CPUs, which have
>> >the advantage of clean design and careful evolution.
>> >
>> >It surely takes a great deal of inspiration, creativity,
>> >and engineering talent to take something as ill-suited
>> >as the x86 architecture and get this kind of performance
>> >out of it. IMHO.
>> >
>> >In other words, making x86 fast must be a lot like
>> >getting Dumbo off the air. That ought to count as
>> >some kind of technical achievement. :)
>>
>> ---snip---
>>
>> It is all done with smoke and mirrors.
>
>Anything the results in a net faster CPU isn't, in my book,
>akin to smoke and mirrors.
>
>If anyone's guilty of "smoke and mirrors", it's probably
>Intel by making a ridiculous long (20-24 stage) pipeline
>just to allow the wayupcrankinzee of clock rates so they can
>be first CPU to X Ghz. Why not a 50 stage pipeline that hits
>8 Ghz, nevermind the hideous branch-misprediction penalties
>and exception overhead?
>
>
>> We do the same
>> here at AMD. The trick is to trade immediate execution
>> for known execution. The x86 code is translated to run
>> on a normal RISC engine.
>
>Yes, and this in and of itself must be rather tricky, no?
>X86 instructions are variable-length, far from load/store,
>have gobs of complexity in protected nonflat mode, etc.
>I'd bet a significant portion of the Athlon or P4 is devoted
>just to figuring out how to
>translate/align/schedule/dispatch
>such a mess with a RISC core under the hood. :)
It doesn't take as much as one would think but it is a hit
on speed and space. Still, the overall hit is really quite
small.
>
>> This means that the same tricks
>> on a normal RISC engine would most likely only buy about
>> a couple percent. It would only show up on the initial
>> load of the local cache. Once that is done, there is
>> really little difference.
>> Choices of pipeline depth, out of order execution, multiple
>> execution engines and such are just the fine tuning.
>> Intel, like us is just closer to the fine edge of what
>> the silicon process can do than anything tricky that
>> people like MIPS don't know about.
>
>Well, why isn't something elegant like Alpha, HP-PA, or MIPS
>at the top of the performance tree then? (Or are they and
>I'm
>just not aware of the latest new products.)
>
>My pet theory is that the higher code density of x86
>vs. mainline RISC helps utilize the memory subsystem
>more efficiently, or at least overtaxes it less often.
>The decoding for RISC is a lot simpler, but
>if the caching systems can't completely compensate for the
>higher
>memory bandwidth requirements, you're stalling more often or
>limiting
>the maximum internal CPU speed indirectly due to the
>mismatch.
>And decoding on-chip can go much faster than any sort of
>external
>memory these days.
This is why the newer processor chips are really a memory
chip with some processor attached, rather than a processor
with some memory attached. We and Intel are turning into
RAM makers. Memory bandwidth is on the increase but it
isn't keeping up with chip speed.
Still, I don't understand why many are not going to more
efficient memory optimization than apparent execution speed.
The compiler writers have a ways to go. The day is gone
when pinhole optimization buys much. Keeping the process
in on chip cache is really the important thing. There isn't
an application out there that if one removed the large data
array and image bit tables, couldn't completely fit in the
caches that are being used today. The compilers just don't
write code well enough to keep the size down. It is just
that we've gotten into the poor choice of languages and poor
connection of software writers to the actual machine code
that is run.
Just my opinion.
Dwight
>
>This isn't really a discussion for classiccmp, but I
>couldn't
>resist since I'm sure at least some folks enjoy
>speculationalism
>on such topics. :)
>
>
>>
>> On a separate subject, I was very disappointed in the
>> Intel Museum. I'd thought it might be a good place to
>> research early software or early IC's. They have vary
>> little to offer to someone looking into this level of
>> stuff. Any local library has better references on this
>> kind of stuff ( and that isn't saying much ).
>> Dwight
>
>n
>
"Dwight K. Elvey" <dwightk.elvey(a)amd.com> wrote:
> Still, I don't understand why many are not going to more
> efficient memory optimization than apparent execution speed.
> The compiler writers have a ways to go. The day is gone
> when pinhole optimization buys much. Keeping the process
> in on chip cache is really the important thing.
As someone who writes code that goes through compilers, the reason why
I don't think too hard about the on-chip cache is because I have no
idea about the size or architecture of that on-chip cache. Well,
I have some idea, and that's that I can't count on it.
OK, so the products I work on are sold as portable C source that
is expected to build and run on a bunch of different processors,
some of which don't have any cache but may be clocked slow
enough for SRAM to keep up. I may not be the programmer you have
in mind.
So, let's take instead the case of someone writing code to run on
Win32. Reading the side of a box for something newish like that,
we could narrow it a bit further, to Win98, WinME, and Win2000
(hmm, maybe that's why this thing was in the closeouts pile, no WinXP).
That could be running on anything made in the last four years, and
what have x86 processor manufacturers done with on-chip caches in
that time? Overall I suspect it's an upward trend but I'm thinking
there were some local downturns for things like the early Celerons
to keep them from competing too effectively with Pentium IIs, but
as mentioned above I haven't really been paying attention.
I am thinking that the programmer will probably not know even if he
does want to think about writing code to fit in on-chip cache, and
he's the compiler vendor's customer. How is the compiler vendor
supposed to have any idea what the eventual target's on-chip cache
will be like?
-Frank McConnell
Hi --
Thanks to Don Maslin I'll soon have a set of reload diskettes for my Kaypro
10, and I plan to bring it from home to my shop to do the reload.
Is there a "park" or "ship" command I need to run before transporting the
unit, so as not to damage the hard drive?
TIA --
Glen
0/0
If I am not for myself, then who will be for me?
And if not now, when?
-- Pirkei Avot
On Oct 9, 8:57, Joe wrote:
> Does anyone know the specs for these disks? Where the cat's eye pattern
is located? How many sectors and tracks they have, etc etc?
They don't have sectors and tracks in the usual sense. Track 16 (on a
48tpi drive; track 32 on a 96tpi drive) has a cat's-eyes pattern. Track 01
or track 34 (02 or 68 on 96tpi) has an index burst pattern (a burst of
signal which is 200 microseconds after the index hole, assuming the speed
is correct).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi all,
I would like to get rid of the following HP stuff:
2 ea HP 9920 but one powersupply is defective.Each has a number of memory
modules.
2 ea 98203a keyboard
2 ea 98622a GPIO interface
2 ea 98204a video interface
2 ea 98626a rs232c interface
1 82913a monitor
2 ea 9021D dual HPIB floppy unit
2 ea 82906a HPIB printer
NO software what so ever.
The stuff is located in Arnhem, The Netherlands and not very light.
Wim
>From: "Philip Pemberton" <philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com>
>
>Hi all,
> OK, so here I am sitting at my computer with a stack of 100 or so disks
>to reformat. Unfortunately most of said disks have been labelled using
>felt-tip pen. And the labels are the nasty kind that don't come off without
>a fight. Sooo... Has anyone got a method that will get these stupid things
>off without leaving a gummy, sticky residue or damaging my disks? I've tried
>WD40 (didn't work at all), 3-in-1 oil (don't ask), an upside down airblaster
>(freeze spray for half the price) and a few other things and nothing works!
> Anyone want to share their secret?
GooGone
Dwight
On Oct 9, 21:00, Philip Pemberton wrote:
> Hi all,
> OK, so here I am sitting at my computer with a stack of 100 or so
disks
> to reformat. Unfortunately most of said disks have been labelled using
> felt-tip pen. And the labels are the nasty kind that don't come off
without
> a fight. Sooo... Has anyone got a method that will get these stupid
things
> off without leaving a gummy, sticky residue or damaging my disks? I've
tried
> WD40 (didn't work at all), 3-in-1 oil (don't ask), an upside down
airblaster
> (freeze spray for half the price) and a few other things and nothing
works!
> Anyone want to share their secret?
Since you're in the UK, I'd suggest one of the aerosol label removers that
CPC sell. They're quite effective.
What I use, though, is white spirit (as used for cleaning brushes used for
oil paint) or sub turps. Several drops on the label (make sure it covers
the whole thing) and leave it for an hour or two, then it will probably
peel off *slowly*. I've even used this to remove thirty-year old labels
>from the covers of ex-library books, but for really stubborn labels like
that, usually I put on enough to make the label look slighly wet, cover it
with a piece of kitchen paper soaked in white spirit (to prevent it all
evaporating too quickly) and leave it for 24 hours.
Any residue can be removed with kitchen paper or a rag moistened in white
spirit, then followed with a dry paper to remove the rest. If it was on
something absorbent (like a book cover) let it dry thoroughly for a day or
two after that.
If the label mostly comes off, but leaves a thin layer of paper, you can
probably scrape that off with a fingernail and remove the rest of the goo
with sellotape and perseverance.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> OK, so here I am sitting at my computer with a stack of 100 or so disks
>to reformat. Unfortunately most of said disks have been labelled using
>felt-tip pen. And the labels are the nasty kind that don't come off without
>a fight. Sooo... Has anyone got a method that will get these stupid things
>off without leaving a gummy, sticky residue or damaging my disks? I've tried
>WD40 (didn't work at all), 3-in-1 oil (don't ask), an upside down airblaster
>(freeze spray for half the price) and a few other things and nothing works!
> Anyone want to share their secret?
I use a two step method.
#1 Avon Skin-So-Soft to remove the label. The oils in it will loosen the
glue so you can remove the label without much effort. However, it leaves
the glue itself behind, so in a few days when the skin so soft completely
dries up, you will be left with a stack of floppies that stick to
everything.
So I do step #2: While the glue is loose, I use rubbing alcohol to remove
the glue residue. Do this AFTER buffing off the excess skin so soft. Once
you give it a scrub down with alcohol, the active glue will be removed,
leaving you with a nice fresh (and ever so pleasent smelling) floppy disk.
Or, if you plan to put a new label on right away, you can skip step #2,
and just buff off the excess skin so soft, and apply a new label
(however, I have had some problems with that in the past... the skin so
soft gets into the plastic, and shortly after you apply the new label,
you find it is falling off... that is why I do the two step process, and
then leave them for a few days to fully dry).
Although I have not had an issue with this... I would be cautious about
getting the skin-so-soft onto the actual disk media... it just doesn't
strike me as being that good for it (fortunatly, it isn't a very tough
thing to control because it does have the consistance of WD40 or light
weight machine oil, so it flows, but not so fast that you can't control
it).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> Would anyone object to adding an official 'cool factor clause' to the
> 10-year rule? We already sorta have that now, where a newer computer (e.g.
> mid-90s SGI MIPS) has sufficient cool factor that we're ok with it. All we
> need is a concept of negative cool factor, so that some computers (e.g.
> Packard Bell PC) might never be on-topic.
>
> In reality, this isn't any more ambiguous than what we already have. The
> other option would be to develop some sort of unit for classicity and set a
> threshold above which a machine is on-topic.
>
> Jeffrey Sharp
I for one obviously don't have a problem with having an official 'cool
factor clause'. After all, then my DEC PWS 433au running OpenVMS would be
ontopic, as would systems such as BeBox's and the like.
I think as a whole, systems that aren't x86 based, or Mac's that are less
than 10 years old have been considered to have suffecient 'coolness factor'.
Besides, about all that seems to cover is UNIX workstations, and OpenVMS
systems.
Also, I think 'custom built' x86 systems that have been specifically built
to emulate older hardware, such as a PDP-10 are almost ontopic.
Zane
Does anyone have manuals for these two pods? I have both of them and they've suddenly gone bad and fail self-test. Both where previously tested good and were properly stored and never used. But last week I pulled one out to use it and the self-test showed it bad before it was even connected to the UUT. Today the same thing happened with another pod! I was using them on a 9010 mainframe that I got recently and I wonder if it somehow damaged them. I can't think of any other explaination. I did verify that they are bad using another mainframe. Does anyone have any ideas? Anyone have manuals for these?
joe
Hello,
I also have a HP 9915A in my possesion. Useless without keyboard and I also
have only documentation for the HP-85.
> >There is also a little board inside that has eight sockets, four of which
> >are populated with 2732 eproms. I am wondering whether this is part of
> the
> >cpu system, or if it is for embedded program storage like the programmable
> >rom card for the 85.
>
> The later. There were software developement kits available that let you
> write programs in assembler and burn them into EPROMs that plugged into a
> HP-85 type plug-in cartridges (called a Hybrid ROM or something like that) or
> directly into the 9915. The EPROMs that are in it are probably Matrix and/or
> I/O ROM IIRC. That seems to be standard in the 9915s that I'm aware of.
This sounds like they are absolute unobtainium today? I'd better start looking
for a HP-85, only they seem to want quite some money when I see them on
eBay :).
> FYI The 9915 doesn't use the HP-85 custom hybrid processor but uses an
> Intel CPU instead! However it does use the HP-85 keyboard processor but only
> for the timers that it contains.
Are you sure? I must take a look at my machine then.. What kind of processor
is in there?
> >I presume that I can hook up a disk with an hp-ib card (and rom), so it
> >should be usable once I find a keyboard and appropriate monitor.
>
> Correct. With the keyboard and monitor it should act exactly like a HP-85
> (except your's doesn't have the tape drive). But it's a lot easier to find a
> HP 85, 86 or 87.
I've always assumed you can't hook up a disk since there is are no disk
routines in ROM?
greetings,
Michiel
Hello,
Some time ago I got a couple of Intergraph Clipper machines. The 2000's are
running great now (I even bought extra memory of eBay :), but I'm still having
some troubles with my Interpro 125.
When I got it, it was without a hard drive. So I put in a scsi drive and tried
to restore the OS with the boot floppies. There is a set of 5 floppies and a
program in the ROM that asks for DISK 1 trhough 5 for restoring CLIX. This
program runs fine, however about halfway (sometimes I got up to disk 4)
a 'screensaver' (the sliding intergraph) kicks in and I'm back to the boot-up
screen. I've tried turning off the screensaver in the prom, but it still
happens :(. Does anyone have an idea what to do or the cause of what is
happening? I've tried tapping keys and moving the mouse, but this doesn't seem
to help..
greetings,
Michiel
At 01:00 AM 10/9/02 -0400, you wrote:
>It's not useful with any of the HP9000 700-series, as it's not HP-HIL
>either. I already gave away all my spare HIL keyboards and mice, but I can
>keep an eye out for more.
Please do! I have a apollo series 700 and could use a KB and mouse,
especially if you happen to come across one cheap :)
I was perusing alt.sys.pdp11 via deja.com recently, and ran across
a posting offering a "PDP-11/44" for sale...
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&start=50&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=alt.s…
I'm sure that message will hit a line break, so be sure to reconnect
it when you cut-and-paste. To make it easy of folks, let me quote
the contents...
"The system has the following cards in it M8300, M8310, M8316, 3 x
M8319, M8320, M8330,M8357, M8416, 2 x M8417, M8433."
... plus an RL02, RX02, 18 RL01Ks, boxes of floppies, docs, etc...
The astute reader will quickly notice that those are *not* PDP-11
handle numbers. It's a PDP-8/a with KK8E processor, KT8A, DKC8-AA,
RL8A, RK8E, KL8A and a wad of RAM.
Even better, it was in Columbus, about four miles from my farm. The
bad news is that I learned about it three weeks too late.
It did not get scrapped; it sold. I'm curious if any of us got it,
and if someone here did, if they could make images of the RL01s
and floppies available.
Wish I could have gotten it, but the hardware is nothing I don't already
have, so hopefully it went to a good home.
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
Duh, memory fades ... PL259!
>To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>From: Jim Battle <frustum(a)pacbell.net>
>Subject: Re: What video monitor for SOL-20?
>
>At 02:23 PM 10/8/02 -0400, Ben Bridgwater wrote:
>>I've just acquired an old Processor Technology SOL-20, and wonder if
>>anyone can advise on what video monitors are compatible with it (how
>>about an old IBM monochrome monitor - hercules compatible?), and what the
>>video connector on the back is (huge 1/2" dia. coax connector) - are the
>>mating connectors still available?
>>
>>Second, I'm planning to use my PC sound card to record/playback in lieu
>>of a tape recorder (more reliable, less hassle), and wonder if anyone has
>>done the same with any success?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Ben
>
>It should hook up to any monitor that you might find in north america, BW
>preferrably. The only weirdness is the PL59 connector, so you may have to
>build a PL59 to BNC or what-have-you cable to connect it to your
>monitor. I picked up a 9" B&W security monitor for $10 at a swap meet and
>it has worked just fine.
>
>Here's where I get to plug my web site:
> http://www.thebattles.net/sol20/sol.html
>
>You may want to seek out the section on repairing the keyboard.
-----
Jim Battle == frustum(a)pacbell.net
In a message dated 10/7/2002 9:10:49 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
bbrown(a)harper.cc.il.us writes:
<< Last night I rescued two Ohio Scientific systems:
A challenger C1P and
A Challenger II (which was a MUCH bigger box, and had a matching big,
heavy dual 8" floppy cabinet).
The haul also included an ADM-3A terminal (always wanted one of
these), and a dual 5 1/4" floppy cabinet (don't know which system
this goes to).
I got no documentation, no software or anything
(these were all picked up from a curb-side garbage pile!!)!
I've always admired the ohio scientific systems...and almost bought a
C1P back in the late 70's (it was a toss up between a C1P and a
trs-80).
Any pointers to documentation, software, specifications, etc??
>>
I have 5 C1P models including a plastic case one. I have schematics and shiny
advertisements that must have came with the system. Interesting machines
although I have not tested mine yet. The 4 I got last year have all sorts of
switches and knobs on them. I think they were modded for extra video
capabilities.
>> Does anyone have an image of the OSI Disk BASIC disk?
> Did they actually have anything called "Disk BASIC"? When
> I used OSI systems, they had two operating systems, OS-65/D
> and OS-65/U (not sure of the punctuation in those).
There was advertised, at least in the UK, a disk expansion
(OSI 610) that included 12k disk BASIC on disk. From what
I remember if you got the fully populated expansion (24k)
and had the full complement of RAM on the CPU (8k) you had
19000 and something bytes free after loading the disk BASIC.
> OS-65/D was what was normally found on smaller systems.
> It was a pathetic excuse for an operating system.
Now I've gone to the trouble of building the hardware I'd like
to try some original software on it.
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Well as for the OS, all I can say is it is a UNIX System V variant... I wish
I had manuals, etc. *sigh*
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Processor? 68020 @ 20MHz
Memory? Mine has 8MB, apparently
Disk capacity? Not sure, mine has a 340MB ESDI drive though
Disk format parameters even? Don't know, have no manuals.. my dad bought the
machine for me at an auction for a whole 5 bucks... It was marked as a "UPS"
heh. Oh it appears to use a modified VME bus possibly.. not sure..
The FDD itself is a Panasonic JU-475-2, and the tape drive is a Tandberg TDC
3820 (525MB QIC-type)
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Is it too new to be on subject? It's got a digitizer screen, but I got it
without the pen.
My stylus for my pilot doesn't seem to work, oh well I got it with a keyboard
and mouse. currently running <ugh> windows 98 </ugh>
: ^ )
Hi there,
I have here a MicroVAX 3400 with Ultrix 4.5 on it. All seems to be running
fine, except from the fact that I cant seem to get any action from the
ethernet port. I myself think its dead but I thought I'd ask here before
I'd give it totally up.
The network card is detected but no lights go on, neither can I do anything
on the network or does it show any connection on the hub. I can ping
localhost and the ip address i gave it, thats how far it goes. If i want to
ping anything else it says, network not reachable (or something like that).
Anybody any ideas ??
yours,
Stefan.
Well, as to not accepting x86-machines, then would that rule out NetFrames?
Those things rock, running Netware SMP or Windows NT.. Fault-tolerant too...
And though it isn't 10 yet, what about my Sequent? Would the fact it runs
Pentium-66s disqualify it? I think I agree with Sellam, in that so long as
it doesn't turn into a Windows support forum its OK... Would be good not to
have basic PC questions either, unless they're for say 5150s or for the
"sort-of-compatible" early clones..
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Hi folks:
I am new to the classiccmp list. I am an EE, and collect teletype machines
and HP test gear. My first computer was an RCA VIP 1802-based board. My
second was an Apple II. I got to play with some bigger stuff when I worked
at Cray Research a decade ago. But I digress.
I have also been collecting HP 85 computer stuff (85A, 85B, 3"/5"/8"
drives, roms, cards...), and I just got a 9915A, which is the industrial
version of the HP 85A (cpu-only in a half-rack box).
This 9915A does not have the tape drive (option 001), but has the operator
interface card (opt 002), which provides connectors for keyboard (DB-25F),
control (DB-15F), and video (BNC). The problem is, I have no keyboard,
monitor, or documentation of any sort for the 9915. I have most of the
useful 85 docs (short of the service manual), but nothing on the 9915.
Judging from the number of pcb connections to the keyboard connector, I'd
guess it uses a special parallel keyboard. I found reference to a 98155A
keyboard in a post about a 9915B (85B-compatible), and I presume that is
the same keyboard used with the A version.
I hooked the video up to the composite input of a tv, and saw text and
graphics when I ran the self-test from the front-panel buttons of the 9915.
The image seemed wider than the screen, and I'm not sure if is just my tv
adjustment, or if the video signal is not quite ntsc composite.
As for the control connector, I have no idea what that might be used for.
There is also a little board inside that has eight sockets, four of which
are populated with 2732 eproms. I am wondering whether this is part of the
cpu system, or if it is for embedded program storage like the programmable
rom card for the 85.
I presume that I can hook up a disk with an hp-ib card (and rom), so it
should be usable once I find a keyboard and appropriate monitor.
Anyone have any docs/info/tidbits/keyboard...?
thanks,
gil smith
;-----------------------------------------------------------
; vaux electronics, inc. 480-354-5556
; http://www.vauxelectronics.com (fax: 480-354-5558)
;-----------------------------------------------------------
Hey all,
Does anyone have info on this beastie? I'm trying to convince it to be
nice to me and lock itself to 1600bpi, but it doesn't wanna play... :(
--fred
--
InterNetworking, Network Security and Communications Consultants
MicroWalt Corporation (Netherlands), Postbus 8, 1400 AA BUSSUM
Phone +31 (35) 6980059 FAX +31 (35) 6980215 http://WWW.MicroWalt.NL/
Dit bericht en eventuele bijlagen is uitsluitend bestemd voor de
geadresseerde. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding aan
derden is niet toegestaan. Er wordt geen verantwoordelijkheid
genomen voor de juiste en volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van
Hi folks,
just excuse if this msg. is posted twice, but I've subscribed to the list
yesterday, and sent the msg. right after subscribing. Although, didn't saw it
in the list... So, please apologize if you got it twice!
I just 'won' an old HP Apollo 700 Series, Model 735/125. Unfortunately, I
don't have ANY information about it - searching HP's website took me to the
service manual, so I know a little bit more about it now.
By searching the web, I've learned that I can use a standard PC-VGA monitor
with the apollo, by soldering (or buying, :-( ) a special cable.
But, a few questions remain:
- Anyone has a PIN-layout for the monitor cable? I know that I have to solder
red to red VGA, red ground to red ground, and so on, but I don't know the
pinout of the VGA connector... Maybe anyone did this before, and can tell
me the correct PIN-to-PIN assignments?! (of course, I could search the web
for the pinout, but I'm also interested in experiences with this special
case)
- Can I use a mouse? Unfortunately, I just got the machine, and nothing
else... But, I found articles dealing with X-Windows, so I think a mouse
should be supported...
- My Apollo doesn't have a standard LAN-connector, just an AUI... I saw
it has a EISA slot, and the manual told me that EISA is fully compliat to
ISA (didn't know this before...). So, can I just equip the Apollo with one
of my old ISA Novell/ Eagle-cards? (Of course, drivers would be a problem
- but I plan to use NetBSD or maybe Linux, so I think I'll find one.)
There's an EISA card in the slot, but
this seems to be a Token Ring (it's called a "Ring" card)
Sorry if my questions are a little bit stupid, but I don't know anything
about the machine - just got it from dumpster without any additional
informatins, and thought it would be nice to use it.
Thanks for your help, I'm glad that there is a mailing list dealing with this
systems - thought I've just got > 10kg of old iron, when I start searching
the web, :-)
keep on hackin',
Harald (bofh(a)dh9dat.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone help Andy? If so, please reply to him directly.
Reply-to: <andy.egendorf(a)netpatents.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:18:05 -0400
From: andy.egendorf <andy.egendorf(a)netpatents.com>
Subject: Remington Rand
I am working with the Rowayton Historical Society in Rowayton
Connecticut, which is putting together artifacts for display concerning
what is generally considered the first commercially available business
computer - the Remington Rand 409 series (1951).
We are trying to locate a source to enable us to punch a few dozen cards
in Remington Rand format (90 column, round holes), and a source which
can print on the cards the data punched into the cards. Both manual and
powered punches were manufactured, but we have not been able to locate
anything, even in museums. Similarly, we have been unable to locate any
printer that could be used. This card format was used into the 60s, and
maybe survived into the 70s or later, so there certainly ought to be
something out there.
Thanks,
Andy Egendorf
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
Hi, folks,
Here's another shameless plug. I've posted a bunch of older DEC docs on E-pay, among them some engineering drawing sets for the PDP-11/05S and 11/10S, the MF11-U core memory system, and some various other books and goodies. There's also a KFQSA DSSI controller. All starting cheap, no reserve on anything.
I'm not going to include all eight links here. Just pop over to Ebay and do a seller search for 'bftbell' (sans the quotes) if you're interested.
Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
ARS KC7GR (Formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77 -- kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates that it would be superior
to what I have now..." (Taki Kogoma, aka Gym Z. Quirk)
Hello Eliot,
I'd be very interested in the PET, if you still have
it. I didn't see any contact info in your post. I
would be grateful if you emailed me with your email or
phone#.
Thanks,
David.
--
dfnr2(a)yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
I am in the market for a DEC TE16 or Kennedy 9300 working drive with
Unibus formatter card and cables.
I don't have much to trade, but will pay reasonable bux and also pay to
have it shipped , or pick up in the NorCal/Oregon/NorNevada areas.
This is for an 11/44 system. I have an M4 Data streamer, a very nice
SCSI/Pertec device, works well, quiet - but it lacks the 'cachet', shall
we say, of watching those reels go 'round.
Cheers and Thanks!
John
Hello, all:
I got my hands on an unpopulated S100 motherboard by Vector
Electronics and I want to put it together for testing purposes. It's an
active-terminated board and I'm having trouble finding equivalent parts for
two transistors:
NPN power: GE D44C1 or NSI D44C4 (TO-220)
PNP power: GE D41D1 or NSI D45C4 (TO-202)(NSI is National
Semiconductor)
Any help would be appreciated.
Rich
Today at auction I purchased from another bidder the following:
A black metal HHC MINI I/O (RL-6002) unit (first I have seen) with Hand Held
computer (RL-H1800) and HHC Color Plotter (RL-P1002) mounted to it.
Panasonic ac adapter RD-9498 first one I have seen.
A Brown leather case for the HHC also my first.
A HHC Printer/Cassette adapter P1004.
Instruction booklet for the HHC models RL-H1000, RL-H1400, and RL-H1800.
A box with 5 Thermal paper rolls for the printer - New.
Several tubes full of plotter pens from Tandy for the plotter.
I purchased four pallets of computers and related stuff for $2.50 plus 10%.
I have not completed listing all the stuff but will update ;list after I get
it done.
The 11/44 I rescued is actually two complete systems in one rack. Last
night I got around to turning up the other system, and was greeted by the
snapping of circuit breakers and the blowing of fuses.. aaahhrg!
Anyway, the H7140 power supply wanted some TLC which it got, but when
recieved, the 'B' system was minus it's Data Paths card, and there were
two spares among all the doc and other stuff, one labled "bad board".
Neither of the two spares work in the 'good' system, and the one from the
good system allows the monitor to sign on, but giving a ??CP HUNG result.
so I have some bus grant/NPG jumer work to do - not a problem.
What IS a problem is that I need one (or two) fuctioning M7904 cards to
make it work, as a printset for the individual CPU cards seems not be
included in the stack I got.
I am also in the market for two or three DD11-CK Single Backplane assy's.
Then, another couple of RL02 drives would round out things. I have found
a nice 9trk subsystem.
I know it's useless to ask about a Unibus SCSI card, so it's possible
that I'll end up buying one... yuk.
Hmmm... come to think of it, an RX02 might be fun, in case of software
finds on Floppies.
I will be brining the working system to VCF 5, as well as (possibly) a
PR1ME 750. I will be in wheel/deal mode then... I'd like to hear back
>from folks who might have some of the above wanted hardware, who will be
at VCF - we can make a deal and do gthe exchange at Moffet Field.
All for now...
Cheers
John
> Zane (and anyone else who is keeps DEC module lists),
In case anyone is wondering: ftp://zane.brouhaha.com/pub/ModuleList.txt
The list is for non-Q-Bus and non-Unibus cards, and it started out as a list
combining all of the PDP-8 card lists that are out there (each of which had
at least some different data).
> I can confirm that the G646 _is_ part of the H212/MM8-EJ. You may
> "connect the dots" in the Module List.
>
> -ethan
Many thanks! I just updated it.
Zane
Zane (and anyone else who is keeps DEC module lists),
I was looking up the functionality of a board set I got off eBay
recently (three auctions for the three boards from an H220 "MM8-E")
and notice that for the H212/MM8-EJ, you list G??? as the core
stack. Having just looked it up in the maintenance prints
(B-DD-MM8EJ-B), it's the G646, which you have listed, but not listed
as part of the MM8-EJ.
I can confirm that the G646 _is_ part of the H212/MM8-EJ. You may
"connect the dots" in the Module List.
-ethan
(now all I need is a working circuit breaker and I can test my "new" H220!)
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
Ok, it's a small one, but it's wonderful to me :)
I just got a case of 1/2 mag tape EOT markers :) Anyone need a pack?
Jay West
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
And if Chris doesn't have it, I know I do, still new in the box even...
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>So what does it take to use a Newt with Winblows? Is there a good
>page I can go to for what software I need on the PeeCee side to
>back it up, and to drop new stuff on it?
It takes a serial cable (mini-din 8 to DE-9 or whatever you have on your
PC side), and the PC Connection Kit software, which I believe is now free
>from Apple's web site (if not, let me know, I am sure I have it here
someplace).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Of course, why would anyone buy the POS anyway? It must truly be great to be
able to be a criminal and then profit from it! Umm, god bless america or
something... *sigh*
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
I for one, have told my parents that should I die, I'd like my computer
stuff to be donated to the Computer Museum, and whatever they don't want,
should be given to RCS/RI and RICM..
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>I have several older models the 100, 110, 120, 130, and eMate 300. They are
>all really cool.
I have just the 100, and 2 of the 110's. (but want a 130, an eMate and a
2100, don't care much about the 120 or 2000)
I was a member of Apple's "Newton Developer Program", so I do have a
number of cool CDs full of stuff. At one point I was writing software for
them, but I wasn't very good.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
It sounds like an old Chromatics graphics workstation... don't know a ton
about it, but I'll bet its powered by a VME embedded SPARCengine, probably a
1+ or something...
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Greetings all,
Have been offered a Barco Chromatics unit, but I'm having the devil of a
time trying to find any decent information out about the unit.
I've been scouring Google but the only useful thing I found is pretty
generic. 6U VME unit, graphics renderer, semi-proprietary UI maybe...
Anyone have any better first-hand knowledge of the unit?
The dude has no VDU for the machine, but it has a set of 5 BNC connectors
which gives me some hope...
Anyways,
Any help appreciated.
JP
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002; "Cini, Richard" <RCini(a)congressfinancial.com> wrote:
> I got my hands on an unpopulated S100 motherboard by Vector
> Electronics and I want to put it together for testing purposes. It's an
> active-terminated board and I'm having trouble finding equivalent parts for
> two transistors:
Looking at a 1982 copy of the ECG Replacement Guide:
> NPN power: GE D44C1 or NSI D44C4 (TO-220)
ECG377 (TO-220) for both
> PNP power: GE D41D1 or NSI D45C4 (TO-202)(NSI is National Semiconductor)
D41D1 - ECG211 (TO-202) D45C4 - ECG378 (TO-220)
ECG377 and ECG378 are listed as Compl. to each other
ECG211 is listed as 1 amp and 6.25 watts
ECG377/378 are listed as 10 amp and 50 watts
Hope this helps,
Mike
Apparently, because I mention Altos in a few places on my website, I got
this request. I just saw some bits about Altos pass recently - someone has
to have a live one still in captivity. Mine are all in need of dustbunny
removal and more.
Please reply to the email below, not to me.
Thanks,
-barry
---
Barry Dobyns, barry(a)dobyns.com, http://www.dobyns.com/barry/museum/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce W. Miller" <bwm(a)cooksonpeirce.com>
To: "Barry A Dobyns" <barry(a)dobyns.com>
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:25 AM
Subject: Help needed
We had an old Altos 3068 (running a 68010 chip I belive) that died. We are
in need of transferring some data
>from the floppys written on that machine to our new server. These were
written using the IBM format.
Do you have any ideas on what we could try?
Thanks, Bruce
Guys,
I have a few console, diagnostic, and patch tapes for the 11/750 and 11/730
on TU-58. I just recently got my 11/750 working, but I don't have a console
tape that will boot it properly, though.
What emulators are used to communicate with the VAX to simulate the TU-58?
Anything for DOS, or is everything Linux based?
I remember a discussion a little while ago about TU-58 tapes and a possible
archive site, has that been set up? If so - when I can get the tapes
archived I can submit these for inclusion.
I'd also like to snarf a console tape archive or two as well... : )
Thanks!
- Matt
Matthew Sell
Programmer
On Time Support, Inc.
www.ontimesupport.com
(281) 296-6066
Join the Metrology Software discussion group METLIST!
http://www.ontimesupport.com/subscribe_t&c.html.
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
Many thanks for this tagline to a fellow RGVAC'er...
I have an Etak Navigator, serial number 67, that was at one time installed
in my car, but many years ago was removed and relegated to a box in storage.
I pulled it out a few months ago, but I have no idea where the tape drive
is. I've moved many times since I worked there. I've contacted Etak (now
Tele Atlas), but so far my inquiries have fallen on deaf ears. Does anyone
out there happen to have a tape drive, or the whole system, that they'd be
willing to sell/trade/etc? TIA, Patrick
For what it's worth; RT-11 V4 seems to exist in both blue AND orange binder
versions! And yes, the V4 manuals in blue do indeed have "PDP-11" style
covers... Weird eh?
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
I looked the model of the drive up, and sure enough, 1.2MB.. Which is
exactly what I had figured.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>I don't have a Newton myself, but my girlfriend does. She got it
>years before meeting me. She doesn't believe her when I tell her
>the kind of "geek points" she earned. Between that and her teaching
>herself to build web pages with a text editor (again, before she met
>me), I think I'm pretty lucky. In return, I helped her move from
>office work to a geek job. Now she's an operator for a data center
>with NT, UNIX and 36-bit machines!
>
>See how much karma a Newton conveys!
>
GOD man, MARRY HER!!!! NOW!!!!!
:-) :-)
(and is her sister cute? :-) )
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
On Oct 7, 11:16, Jochen Kunz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:50:54AM +0000, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>
> > I always get the QIC numbers confused. Which are the interface
> > descriptions and which are the tape formats?
> http://www.qic.org/html/qicstan.html
Thanks, I've bookmarked that so I have (almost) no excuse now!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Oct 7, 6:57, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> DQ686 is an ESDI controller, with MSCP protocol.
Oops, I meant DU686 (though a DQ is much the same thing, only for QBus
instead of Unibus).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
It is possible that it is 760K, I haven't looked up the model number on the
floppy drive in my 3068EP yet, I was just guessing due to the lateness of
the machine..
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
The auctions for Kevin Mitnick's two laptops have closed. One reached $15,200 and the other reached $14,100! The $14,100 didn't reach the minimum! That's got to be some kind of records for laptops! There's something very odd going on with the first auction, the winner and the seller both have -1 feedback ratings!
<http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewListedItems&u…>
Joe
The all time classic scope has to be the Tektronix 465. It's the right vintage to go with most of the classic computers too.
Joe
At 08:45 AM 10/7/02 -0700, you wrote:
>Ok, I need some advice on what type of scope might be available for
>troubleshooting vintage computers.
>I have already decided that I need more than is necessary. I want to
>limit my choice to a economically priced portable LCD scope. However, I'm
>not familar with what is available.
>Any good choices?
>
>
>
I pinged him today, and he's just fine, thanks ... Just busy with some other
stuff ...
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Does anyone have the first version of the Pentium BIOS Writer's Guide?
If so, please contact me.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
A listmember and I met today, in a city in the middle of the USA, to
exchange some hardware. If you cctech-ers are wondering why you haven't got
list mail in several days, well, now you know the rest of the story. :-)
He got a Stardent deskside that I originally rescued from a Austin, Texas
auction block. He also got a complete Xerox 8010 of his that I had
transported and stored for him from elsewhere in the country.
I got a nearly-complete Symbolics 3650 system and a DEC Computer Lab. I've
always thought that LISP was an entertaining language, and that a LISP
machine would be equally entertaining (maybe bewildering). Now maybe I'll be
able to find out. Oh gods, that thing was heavy! But at least it came with a
very cool (albeit later-model) space cadet keyboard, like the one pictured
here:
http://www.abstractscience.freeserve.co.uk/symbolics/photos/IO/index.html
--
Jeffrey Sharp
On Oct 6, 12:52, Stan Pietkiewicz wrote:
> I spotted a few cards at the local dismantlers the other day, and I
> wonder what they are:
> - dual-height (2 card edge fingers) with a sticker reading " MTI Model
> MSV05B" and a 50-pin header at the outside edge of the card
> - quaad-height with a silk-screened Dilog logo and DQ130 model number
> and 2 50-pin headers at teh ccard edge.
DQ130 is a Dilog controller providing a Pertec 2x50-way interface for a
tape drive. I guess the other is a QIC-02 or similar interface. I always
get the QIC numbers confused. Which are the interface descriptions and
which are the tape formats?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York