the design of having to change
backplane wiring for certain cards seems to be rather... ummmm silly
--
this dates back to the days when a DMA interface wouldn't fit into
a single SPC (small peripheral controller) board.
at least they eventually produced G7273 unibus grant jumpers which
aren't little nasty tear-the-back-of-your-hand-off boards like the
G727's are, and have both BR and bus grant jumpers on them. These
were standard in 11/44's, weren't they? so your SPC slots shouldn't
have the bus grant jumpers on them..
I recently acquired what I believe to be a Heathkit H89. It was
assembled a long time ago by my friend's father, contains a single disk
drive and a monochrome terminal.
My ultimate goal would be to get this thing running CPM and a C
compiler, but first I need to figure out if it's working.
I've yet to determine if it has a hard or soft-sectored disk controller,
but I have some general questions since I don't have any documentation.
First, where can I get some documentation? ; )
Second, when I turn the machine on, all I get is a blinking cursor. If
I depress the "offline" key, I can type characters on the terminal
accompanied by a short beep; if the "offline" key is not depressed, I
get long beeps and nothing on the display. What "should" it do when I
turn it on with no disk in the drive?
I'll be happy to provide more info as I dig it up, but any introductory
details on this system or references to websites, etc. would be greatly
appreciated.
Jason J. Gullickson
mr(a)jasongullickson.com
Hi,
Today I found a Microvax II that is waiting for the scrapper.
The case contains 3 RDXXX HDs, a TK50, Ethernet and some serial line
controllers. And of course the CPU and an unknown amount of memory.
I don't know the part no. of the case but it is the one that is
twice as wide as the BA23 and has wheels.
Seems to be in perfect condition.
If anyone is interested I will roll it to a save place.
It has to be gone during the weekend...
It is located in 57068 Siegen, Germany and free for *pickup* only.
bye
Thilo
Hi,
Last week I found something which I think may be an ancient
NVRAM Module. Sadly I couldn't find any useful information on
the web, except on this page:
http://www.iser.uni-erlangen.de:8980/iser/servlet/Anzeigen45?inventarnummer…
It uses rather large magnetic rods to store data (4x25mm).
The PCB is dated 1972 and it was probably used in a Nixdorf-Computer.
It's called Staebchenspeicher in german (maybe rod-memory in english?).
Does anyone have further information on this module?
bye
Thilo
Hi Curt!
Yes, I know about that site, but they want WAY too
much money for a used adapter for an old computer.
You would think that at this point, they'd be about
$20.00 or so, since I can buy whole ST's for about
that price. I just can't justify spending $150.00 or
more to put a hard drive on a $20.00 computer.
I just want to play...
So, I'll keep looking. Maybe I'll spot something cheap
on eBay or at the Trenton Computer Festival in May.
AERCO was a small Texas company that made little
gadgets for the Atari ST, Amiga and Timex/Sinclair
computers. When I worked for Zebra Systems, Inc. We
sold their products...
Regards,
Al
> From: "Curt Vendel" <curt(a)atarimuseum.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:13:41 -0500
>
> Hi Al,
>
> Never heard of that particular memory board
> before, don't know where you can get a manual.
> For a HD you can go to www.myatari.com and buy
> a "ICD LINK" Adapter which will give your DMA/ASCI
> port full SCSI capabilities, also ask them about
> ExtenDOS Gold, its a drivers disk that will allow
> the TOS to recognize and use CD-ROM drives too, they
> also have a large selection of ST software on
> CDROM's
>
>
>
> Curt
Hey, gang,
Those of you in the Puget Sound area, or near enough to it to get to Kent, WA with a minimum of hassle, may be interested to know that there are three HP 7980S SCSI 9-track tape drives at Boeing Surplus, $50.00 Ea. They look like they were pulls from a big HP mini.
Enjoy!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
ARS KC7GR (Formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77 -- kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates that it would be superior
to what I have now..." (Taki Kogoma, aka Gym Z. Quirk)
I am in need of the following Flip Chip modules:
R302 (3)
R604 (2)
R002
S111 (7)
S602 (2)
R210 (8)
If you have any spares that you wouldn't mind trading or selling away,
please contact me directly <vcf(a)vintage.org>.
Thanks!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Cord try doing a Google search using PX-4 as the search, which is the basic
p/n for that unit (PX-4/HX-40) .
I did and came up with all kinds of info, including a site that lets you ftp
download a bunch of rom ifo (Like the BASIC rom).
Good luck.
GWW
Can anyone suggest a safe way to remove grime that is so old and so thick
that the only way to remove it is to rub it off with your bare fingers?
I slathered this board in contact cleaner and it didn't do anything. The
grime just remained. If I rub it with my bare fingers then it will
eventually start to rub off and leave little remainders like pencil eraser
droppings.
Any ideas?
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
>From: knightstalkerbob(a)netscape.net
>
>"Jason J. Gullickson" <mr(a)jasongullickson.com> wrote:
>
>>I recently acquired what I believe to be a Heathkit H89. It was
>>assembled a long time ago by my friend's father, contains a single disk
>>drive and a monochrome terminal.
>>
>>My ultimate goal would be to get this thing running CPM and a C
>>compiler, but first I need to figure out if it's working.
>>
>>I've yet to determine if it has a hard or soft-sectored disk controller,
>>but I have some general questions since I don't have any documentation.
Hi
Sorry, I lost the first message.
One can tell if it is hard or soft sectored by the
controller card. The hard sectored has a uart ( or usart )
chip and the soft sectored has one of the typical
FD controller chips. I think it may have been a Western
Digital that they used.
The other problem is that CPM requires RAM at the
lower addresses. You'll need to make the modification
that allows one to shadow the ROM. I suspect that it
is either on this groups archives or you might look
in the news group comp.os.cpm. I've seen it talked
about someplace.
Dwight
--- Tom Uban <uban(a)ubanproductions.com> wrote:
> Sorry, but my hard drive crashed and my DSL went down, both in the same
> week and unrelated...
Thanks for responding (but between a helpful post on classiccmp from
Mark Roberts and cracking mine open to meg it out myself, I'm up and
running ;-).
I put a 12V switcher I got at Dayton for about $5 in an ancient and
long empty external 400K Mac drive case (belonged to my mother when
the drive inside died over 12 years ago) and wired it up to a C-64
drive cable half I got from the thrift store (someone spliced their
own extension cable in the middle by twisting the wires and encasing
it all in PVC tape :-P ) Worked the first time.
So now I'll have an flat-screen terminal powered by a PSU in a Mac
drive case, talking to a portable PDP-8 in an Amiga drive case. Guess
I should post some pictures of that. :-)
-ethan
Hello all,
I got an HP7974A 9-track Tape. Is there anyone on this list who has some
documentation about this tape. Esp. I'm interested in servicing
informations, schematics and manuals.
As I already often noticed with other tapedrives it's drive capstan has
turned to goo. Has someone hints or experiences in repairing the rubber
of a tape capstan.
Andreas
Saw this on spamnet news. No association, replys to original author, etc.,
etc., etc.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "" <>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 6:17 PM
Subject: [OT ... but ...] RS/6000 stuff in Munich - go and get it !
> Hi !
>
> Recently I got a mail from Florian Wolf (wolf -at- ingeniq.de), who
offered
> RS/6000 machines for those capable to lug them home. He doesn't give the
> Models, but one is a -55L (big server - 7012 I would say) with CD and
tape, two
> are desktops -370 (7012 too I think) and one -43P (?). All are in good
order,
> look complete and have E(i)thernet cards inside.
>
> They have to move latest at the end of next week or else they are crapped.
>
> Leave me a note or write or write Florian in direct mail. And: you *need*
to be
> capable to pick them up in Munich. Arrangements *might* be possible like
for
> instance to pick them up at Florians place and not where they are now -
but
> that's matter of individual negotiations.
I tracked down some new info on the Micom (which I've
blathered about before). On the great NL computer site :
Allard's computermuseum Groningen
http://drake.nl/computermuseum/philips/p5003.html
is a new(?) addition, the Philips P5003. It is basicly a
copy of the Micom 2001 which Philips had acquired when
they bought a big chunk of the Canadian company Micom
The 2001 was the next model after the original 2000
(which was introduced in 76) and differed in that it had an
attached keyboard. The boards in the P5003, which
came out in 79/80, are basicly the same as in the
2000 and are even labeled as such. They can be
compared with those on Bill Sudbrinks site.
http://wsudbrink.dyndns.org:8080/osi/micom2000.html
The Groningen site also has a nice shot of another
canadian machine. An AES which is credited with being
the first programmable wordprocessor and was a previous
start-up by Stephen Dorsey who also founded Micom.
Lawrence
lgwalker@ mts.net
Why? You don't need to have a MMU for multi tasking.
MMUs are ment for virtual addressing which is a
complete different concept.
They are also used for address translation and memory
protection. Both usefull functions in a multitasking
system and both needed to implement virtual memory
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Pat,
The CMD CQD-420/TM design uses a daughter card of which there
is a single-ended version and a differential version. The differential
version should actually be a little less expensive because most users
want the single-ended, and the cost of getting a single-ended daughter
card to replace the differential one is expensive. Therefore perhaps better
supply and lower demand for differential. I DON'T HAVE ANY OF THESE
ANYMORE. THEY WERE SOLD, to a buyer in the mid-west. But you can
find them searching Google. But even the differential ones still are more
than all but the most exceptional hobbyist would want to get in to.
Best Regards
At 06:52 PM 2/12/03 -0500, you wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Fred N. van Kempen wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Now that I inherited a nice set of StorageWorks enclusures with
> > an HSZ40C controller, I might as well use it, no? I plan on
> > connecting it to the primary file server of my "fun" network
> > (also known as VAXlab, aka pdp11.nl) so I'll have more (and safer)
> > storage there.
> >
> > Only prob is.. the HSZ40C has a diff-scsi port, whereas the machines
> > have SE.
> >
> > Is this easily converted with a cable, or will I be doing resistor-
> > balancing and/or use a signal converter box?
>
>It can't be done with just passive components.. ie you will need either a
>differential<->single-ended converter or a differential SCSI card. If
>you're using a machine that takes PCI cards, then a card will be cheaper,
>but if you're using it with a VAX or PDP-11, etc, I'm doubtful you'll find
>a differential-scsi interface, and will need to buy an interface box.
>
>If you need/want a PCI wide/differential SCSI card, I have several Adaptec
>AHA-3944AUWD's (with PC BIOS ROMs) that I would be willing to sell at a
>'reasonable' price (probably $40 + shipping).
>
>As far as 'converter boxes' go, I don't know what one would cost, because
>I've never had to buy one.
>
>Pat
>--
>Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS
>Information Technology at Purdue
>Research Computing and Storage
>http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu
> Only prob is.. the HSZ40C has a diff-scsi port, whereas the machines
> have SE.
>
> Is this easily converted with a cable, or will I be doing resistor-
> balancing and/or use a signal converter box?
Look for a Paralan SE-to-Diff converter box.
Zane
> You would need a different SCSI card.
Try telling a VAX 4000-100A that :)
> As you probably know, the HSZ -> storage scsi is
> all SE, just the port back to the host is differential.
Yup.. and I could either find a signal converter then, or
perhaps the DSSI port adapter for the HSZ40 ..
--f
Looks like an interesting item for a total of $11 including shipping. But
does that include the keyboard? Neither this listing nor the last one I saw
on eBay showed a picture of a keyboard nor explicitly stated that a keyboard
was included as far as I could see. Do these ELT320 terminals use a
standard interface keyboard that is easy to replace if you get one without a
keyboard?
>From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>Subject: Who here has a Planar ELT-320?
>Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:15:23 -0800 (PST)
>
>Second time around, I won an ELT-320 on ePay...
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
On Feb 12, 7:47, Philip Pemberton wrote:
> > Wasn't there a thread a while back in which someone mentioned
washing
> > circuit boards in a dishwasher?
> I know Lee Davison's done it. Only catch is, you may have to replace
a few
> components after cleaning it - electrolytics, etc.
If you have to replace electrolytics after washing, there was something
wrong with the electrolytics before you started. They're routinely
washed commercially. There are other sorts of components that may be
damaged by washing, though.
> Electrolube "Fluxclene" and straight IPA are quite good. I've used
70% IPA
> to remove light dirt from PCBs, Fluxclene is insanely aggressive. It
doesn't
> fizz or bubble, but it removes nearly anything - it's intended to be
used to
> remove solder flux. And it leaves most components and plastics
intact.
It will certainly work, but if the board is very dirty, you'll still
need to wash it in clean water (and possibly detergent) afterwards to
get rid of the residues, and then get rid of the water (IPA, compressed
air, whatever). Kitchen worktop cleaner is much cheaper and works just
as well.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I bought a xx2247 key from ebay. Just in case others are planning to do the
same, the key appears to be an almost brand new copy. There is a *slight*
amount of rust in the areas that were cut away, but other than that it is
nice shiny new chrome.
I purchased mine for the starting bid of $10, but they then charged me $10
more for shipping (actual shipping was $4.30), making for an expensive key.
I called the local locksmith and they will duplicate this type of key for
$6 each. The other thing to note is that the key I obtained from Ebay auction
is stamped Do Not Duplicate, which the original DEC keys (I have 2) do not say.
I figure they had a original copied a few years back, and added the Do Not
Duplicate just in case a customer needed more than 1 key, so they would
have to pay through the nose for it.
Now I see they have the starting bid boosted to $25, for a non-original
duplicate key, what a load of...
PS: I happen to have the locking mechanism disconnected from a PDP 8/E
power supply, and before i reinstall it, i plan to bring it and the keys
to that locksmith so i can have some cheaper, 'working' copies of the
key made. I like having a key sitting in the lock ready to turn. If others
need a key, let me know and i'm sure I can get you one for a lot less
than that ebay guy.
-Lawrence LeMay
VCF Gazette
Volume 1, Issue 4
A Newsletter for the Vintage Computer Festival
February 12, 2003
Hello Vintage Computer Fans! There is exciting news in this issue,
with yet another Apple-1 auction brought to you by the Vintage Computer
Festival.
In this issue:
Apple-1 Auction
VCF Europa 4.0
VCF East Update
VCF Archives: On The Move
VintageTech Punch Card Conversion Services
Latest Additions to the VCF Archives
Apple-1 Auction
---------------
The Vintage Computer Festival, which has accidentally gained a
reputation as the premier auctioneer of Apple-1 computers, is at it
again. We are proud to announce our third Apple-1 auction!
The Apple-1 we are currently auctioning is the finest example yet.
It includes a wooden enclosure that neatly bundles the keyboard,
power supply and Apple-1 board together into a nice, tidy unit.
Information about the Apple-1, including information on how to
register as a bidder, can be found here:
http://www.vintage.org/special/2003/apple-1/
If you've been looking for an Apple-1 to add to your collection,
this is your chance!
VCF Europa 4.0
--------------
The fourth annual Vintage Computer Festival Europa is being held on
May 3rd and 4th at the Mehrzweckhalle des ESV M?nchen Ost in Munich,
Germany.
VCF co-producer Hans Franke hosts another fine event that brings
together Europe's most celebrated old machines. Lectures, exhibits,
and some damn good German beer (served onsite!) await you.
More information on VCF Europa 4.0 can be found here:
http://www.vcfe.org/
Join us for some geeky fun, European style!
VCF Archives: On The Move
-------------------------
As of the last issue of the VCF Gazette, we announced our plans to
open our VCF Archives to the public by the end of 2002. Well, fate,
as always, has dealt an unexpected hand.
The Alameda County Computer Resource Center, which graciously hosts
the VCF Archives, abruptly announced in late November their intention
to move into a new facility in Berkeley, California. As of this
writing, the ACCRC is now in the midst of transitioning its operations
into the new facility.
The new facility in Berkeley is not as large as the Oakland facility,
and so there is no room to set up the complete VCF Archives there.
The VCF will have a small computer history exhibit in the corner of
the new community center that the ACCRC is building to allow the local
public access to computers and the internet.
In the meantime, the ACCRC has concluded negotiations on a 42,000
square foot facility at the old Oakland Army Base in Oakland,
California (only a few miles away from the existing location). This
facility will be used primarily by the ACCRC for processing computer
and electronics scrap that is received for recycling. The plan is for
the VCF to move its archives to this facility and operate its publicly
accessible archive from this location.
The net effect for the VCF is that we are probably still about six
months away from being able to offer our entire archives for public
consumption. The move, while mildly inconvenient, is a strategic and
necessary step by the ACCRC to grow its operations, and the VCF sees
this as an opportunity to grow our own operations as well.
The ACCRC is fully committed to hosting the VCF Archives, and the VCF
is fully committed to supporting and promoting the ACCRC, which is
probably the most successful and prolific non-profit organization in
the world that distributes computer technology free of charge to
deserving entities and individuals around the globe.
Your support of the Alameda County Computer Resource Center is greatly
welcomed and appreciated. You can read all about this fine
organization at their website:
http://www.accrc.org
If you have the means, please consider sending them a donation. You
might even consider volunteering your time. Their website contains
complete donation and volunteer information.
VCF East 2.0 Update
-------------------
VCF East 2.0 is still in the planning stages. Our primary focus right
now is locating a proper venue. Our focus continues to be on the
Boston metropolitan area, which presents the most convenient prospects
for staging VCF East. We will hopefully have a venue selected within 2
weeks, and will announce a date for VCF East 2.0 sometime in June.
VCF East 2.0 is being planned according to a very tight budget. This
is the first VCF that is being completely planned and budgeted in
advance. This is out of necessity, due to the continuing prevailing
economic conditions that make it difficult to run any business, let
alone a short term function such as the Vintage Computer Festival.
We must strictly adhere to this budget in order to make VCF Eeast 2.0
happen.
We realize that many people are looking forward to VCF East 2.0 and
we apologize for the continuing delays. However, we feel we are close
to announcing a date and location. As soon as we have the information
we'll be sure to make an immediate announcement so that attendees and
exhibitors can make plans.
So please, stay tuned!
VintageTech Punch Card Conversion Services
------------------------------------------
VintageTech, the VCF off-shoot that provides old computer technology
and services to business and academia, has recently gotten one of the
VCF's old punch card readers working.
The reader is a Documation M200, and even at nearly 30 years old it's
still capable of reading 200 cards per minute, its top speed. The
reader's interface, being meant to connect directly to a specific
punch card reader controller in a DEC or other mini-computer, has
no "modern" equivalent. In order to get the data from the reader to
a PC, an converter needed to be built. We used what we knew: an
Apple //e.
The output of the reader can be considered to be 12-bit, since there
are 12 data holes on a punch card. There are also several signal
outputs that tell the host machine if there was a problem (such as a
card getting stuck in the reader). Our Apple //e is fitted with a
custom-built parallel interface card with 20 inputs. The data and
signal inputs from the reader were wired into a special harness to fit
the parallel card. Software to control the reader and decode the
punch card data was developed on the Apple //e. As the data is read
on the //e, it is sent over a serial port to a PC, where the data can
then be saved to modern media for preservation.
Reading punch card data into a PC involves two steps: first, the data
on the card, as represented by the holes punched into it, must be
decoded; second, that data, which can be stored in any one of over a
dozen encodings, must be converted to ASCII. Punch cards evolved from
the first machines that Herman Hollerith invented to conduct the 1890
census count for the United States. As punch card technology evolved,
so did punch card character sets. Special symbols such as punctuation
were added to the basic character set consisting of letters and
numbers. Eventually, character set standards evolved. IBM, which
for the most part pioneered punch card technology, had two common
sets: "FORTRAN", used for FORTRAN program coding, and "Commercial",
used for encoding general data. In each of these character sets, only
a few minor punctuation characters have different encodings. The
letters and numbers are encoded the same.
Decoding punch card data is a matter of interpreting the holes. First
of all, data is encoded on punch cards in columns. There are 80
columns on a typical punch card, and each column contains one encoded
character. In fact, this 80 column width is the reason why computer
terminals, and subsequently personal computers, usually had a screen
width of 80 characters: it was a throw back to the punch card!
Across the punch card there are 12 rows. The rows are numbered 1
through 9, and then 0, 11, 12. Encoding a number is simple. To
encode a '5' for example, the 5 row is punched in a column. To encode
a '0', the 0 row is punched. It's as simple as that. The rows 0, 11,
and 12 are called "zones", and are used to encode letters and
puncutation symbols. So for instance, to punch an 'A' character, the
12 hole and the 1 hole are punched. A 'B' is the 12 hole and the 2
hole, a 'C' is the 12 hole and the 3 hole, and so on, all the way up
to 12 and 9, which is an 'I'. At that point, the alphabet continues
in the next zone, which is 11. So 11 and 1 is 'J', 11 and 2 is 'K',
etc. Finally, the alphabet ends at 0 and 9, which is 'Z'.
Some characters are encoded by punching more than one hole. The most
common special characters are encoded by punching the 3 and 8 or 4 and
8 holes and then one of the zones (0, 11 or 12). Some crazy character
sets, like IBM's EBCDIC, can have up to 5 holes being punched to
represent one character (usually a special control character).
As the punch cards are whisked through the reader, the hole punches
are sent over the interface to the Apple //e, which then interprets
the data according to a character set table in memory that is used to
decode the data from punch card codes into ASCII. That character is
then flung over the serial port to a waiting PC that then captures
and stores the data to a file. A typical 2000 card deck, representing
2000 lines of code or data (or 160,000 bytes maximum), can be read in
about 10 minutes. By comparison, the Apple //e could read an entire
143K disk in under 6 seconds. And a typical PC today can devour that
amount of data in less than a millisecond. How times have changed...
A lot of useful programs and data are locked away on old punch cards.
If you or someone you know has such data and would like to have it
recovered, please visit VintageTech to inquire about our punch card
data conversion services. VintageTech can also read and convert just
about any old media format into a modern format.
http://www.vintagetech.com
Latest Additions to the VCF Archives
------------------------------------
Some cool new stuff has made its way into the VCF Archives. Here are
the highlights:
o Unassembled Ohio Scientific Superboard II kit (circa 1982)
o LNW Research Corporation LNW80 (TRS-80 Model 1 clone)
A long time ago, the VCF used to maintain what we called the "Recent
Acquisitions Report" (RAR). This was a list of all the latest goodies
that were found while out and about hunting for old computers. The
RAR is defunct now, but the old entries are still up. In case anyone
is interested in reviewing the old reports, you can find them here:
http://www.vintage.org/vcf98/rar.htm
The RAR as it stands represents one and a half years of VCF collecting
efforts. The collection has of course continued to grow since then.
You can check out the specs of the VCF Archives here:
http://www.vintage.org/archive.php
That wraps it up for this issue of the VCF Gazette! Until next time...
Best regards,
Sellam Ismail
Producer
Vintage Computer Festival
http://www.vintage.org/
The Vintage Computer Festival is a celebration of computers and their
history. The VCF Gazette goes out to anyone who subscribed to the VCF
mailing list, and is intended to keep those interested in the VCF
informed of the latest VCF events and happenings. The VCF Gazette is
guaranteed to be published in a somewhat irregular manner, though we
will try to maintain a quarterly schedule.
If you would like to be removed from the VCF mailing list, and
therefore not receive any more issues of the VCF Gazette, visit the
following web page:
http://www.vintage.org/remove.php
PEACE ;)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
You know the thingy that sits on top of the stack of punch cards and
pushes them down into the hopper of a punch card reader?
I need the weight of that thing for a Documation M200 reader. I'm using
the weight from a Documation D150 and it just doesn't work right.
Bonus points for telling me what this is called ;)
Thanks!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
>From: "Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
>
>> >> > A segmented architecture...
>> >> I have one word to say about segmented architecture... "Ewwwww"
>
>> >:) I like segmented systems. It's one of the best concepts for
>> >address space extension. Ok, I also think that the 8086 is one
>> >of the best 16 Bit CPUs (*1) ever, and as the 186 core at the
>
>> Then you'll love the Z8000. Its segments are non-overlapping
>> ( unless a mmu makes them so ).
>
>I never had a problem with overlaping. Programming is always
>a matter of diszipline, and well written code never accesses
>unassigned data :)
>
>The Z8000 was always a bit weired. a nice design, but weired.
>Ok, I never programmed it, only thinking around when I had to
>choose a processor for a system around 1980. The candidates
>where 16016, 68000, Z8000, 8086 and 9900.
>The 8086 droped out because of the complicated bus structure,
>the 9900 because 64K where not enough, otherwise it would have
>been my choice (and the 99000 wasn't realy available). So the
>finalists where National vs. Motorola vs. Zilog. After all,
>the NS16000 did offer the best extensibility, a complete and
>beliveable family model and a real nice and clean programming
>model. So 16016 it was.
>
>> I like the 186 myself but have to admit that the time for
>> segmented memory has passed, in general purpose computing.
>
>Well, define general purpose computing. In my eyes this
>describes real computers ... ala IBMish Mainframes, and
>Segmented memory never had a place there. When going for
>small systems, the 186 is still one of the best CPUs to
>use. Powerfull, fast, simple and high integrated. I don't
>know anything which can't be done in a megabyte of mem.
Hi Hans
We agree here. The only hard part of working with the
186's is getting the init sequence debugged. Once that
is done they are great.
I don't think that I've ever written
a program that took more than about 35K ( not counting data
space ). Then again, most of the larger programs I've written
were in Forth so it is hard to compare.
Dwight
>
>Gruss
>H.
>
>--
>VCF Europa 4.0 am 03./04. Mai 2003 in Muenchen
>http://www.vcfe.org/
This seller has an (apparently) large stock of these IMS slave CPU
boards and has been slowly getting rid of them on eBay. No
complaints, though I didn't realize it was a slave as opposed to
standalone CPU board when I picked up a pair.
Haven't found any info on them, but I'm not looking all that hard
either.
--Steve.
On Feb 11, 18:49, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a safe way to remove grime that is so old and so
thick
> that the only way to remove it is to rub it off with your bare
fingers?
>
> I slathered this board in contact cleaner and it didn't do anything.
The
> grime just remained. If I rub it with my bare fingers then it will
> eventually start to rub off and leave little remainders like pencil
eraser
> droppings.
Don't use contact cleaner. Proper contact cleaner contains oil. It's
not nearly as bad as WD40, but you don't really want the board covered
in a flm of oil.
If it's just one board, try washing it in warm water with some
washing-up liquid (dishwashing detergent). If the grime is that
stubborn, assist the process with a dishwashing brush. Rinse well, dry
carefully (shake off or blow off as much water as possible, use some
IPA to help remove the water). If you're in an area with very hard
water, the final rinse before the IPA might best be done with distilled
or deionised water. Don't dry the boards flat, the object is to let as
much water (and any minerals dissolved in it) as possible to drain off.
Make sure the board is thoroughly dry, which may take a day or two,
especially if there are switches or sockets on it, before you try to
use it.
If that's too much like hard work, or you have a lot of boards to
clean, consider using the dishwasher. That's what's used commercially
(at least, for small-scale stuff). However, DON'T let it do the drying
cycle (too hot for some things) and don't use the dishwasher if the
board contains anything that might suffer: transformers, relays (unless
hermetically sealed), paper labels that must be preserved, anything
with extremely fine wires (core mats), etc. I've been told some very
old ICs (grey type) don't like being immersed in hot water. I've never
had a problem with that, but YMMV. Some old types of compressed paper
boards (Paxolin) may not like the dishwasher either. Same rules apply
about drying.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Sorry about the date... Not only did I get it wrong, but posted it in the
US convention... In your terms, it would be 2/9/01, A Sunday, at @ 00:15,
CST (GMT -5).
Cheers...
Ed Tillman
Store Automation Tech Support Specialist
Valero Energy Corporation
San Antonio, TX; USA
Phone (210) 592-3110, Fax (210) 592-2048
edward.tillman(a)valero.com <mailto:edward.tillman@valero.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Sellam
> Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:11 AM
> To: 'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org'
> Subject: RE: Home to remove monumental grime?
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Tillman, Edward wrote:
>
> > From what are you trying to remove the grime?
>
> A very precious board, so anything not extraordinarily safe is right out.
>
> > - Pencil erasers work in a multitude of places, on a multitude of
> things...
>
> This would probably be the best bet. In the meantime I used a paper towel
> to rub the board where the grime was and it did a decent job, but there is
> still a layer of film.
>
> > **Watch-out rubbing it off with your bare fingers: you can generate ESD
> > (static electricity) and fry sensitive circuits/components!
>
> I removed all the ICs from their sockets.
>
> > [Note: Water may actually be one of the LEAST harmful cleaners! On
> > 11/2/01, a week before the WTC debacle, my primary network server system
>
> Then that would've been 4/9/01, yes? ;)
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
> Festival
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
> http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at
> www.VintageTech.com *
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]
>> At first I filled my tank at my fire house off our breathing air
>> compressor, but that got to be a pain, so I bought a small air compressor
>> (also at Sears, also about $40)
>
>You mean one of those small, tankless compressors? I went to Sears last
>night, and the cheapest tank-equipped compressor they had was $180.
>Considering the potential cheapness of used scuba gear, that's way too much
>to pay for air. Anyway, I'd always thought that those little compressors
>weren't all that great. Am I wrong?
Correct, a tankless compressor. The type sold for filling car tires or
whatever.
The one I have is pretty good considering the price, but I can't use it
directly to run my blowgun. I have to fill my storage tank, and run the
blow gun off that. The reason is, the compressor will go to 250 PSI, but
it starts at Zero and works its way up. So if I attach the blowgun
directly to it, I never get more than about 1 or 2 PSI (whatever pressure
it builds up from friction going thru the hose).
But, the compressor works very well for filling my 12 gallon air tank to
200 PSI, which then works very well for running my blowgun at 10-60 PSI
(depending on where I set the regulator).
Although used SCUBA gear is a good cheap option, you have to consider how
often you are going to fill it, and how much that is going to cost you.
Remember, if you pay $180 for a tank/compressor at Sears, that's it. From
then on out, compressed air is more or less free (electricity to power
the compressor, and maintenance costs). With a SCUBA tank, you might buy
the tank and regulator for under $100, but you will pay for each refill
(unless you know someone that has a 3000 PSI compressor... if you are
friends with a fireman, ask if their department can do it, we do for
friends and the occasional resident if they ask nicely, but then not all
FDs have their own breathing air compressor, and fewer have the
attachments for filling SCUBA gear)
If you figure $8 each, your last $80 is used up in 10 fillings. Not to
mention the time/effort/annoyance to have to fill it when it runs out at
the worst possible time. But if you don't fill the bottle offen (those
bottles hold a LOT of air at 1 atmosphere), then SCUBA might be the
cheaper, and certainly quieter option.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Well, this is not in my 1981, 82, 84 or 85 HP catalogs. I was wondering what
resource it manages, what it plugs into? Any info out there on this? Anyone
have a 1983 HP catalog they could check? or maybe a 1980?
It works with the HP 9825, 9835 & 9845 series of computers from the early
1980s. On the other end is an Amphenol 50 pin female connector, similar to
early SCSI 1 connectors.
Pictures at:
http://members.aol.com/innfosale/ebay/98029A1A.JPGhttp://members.aol.com/innfosale/ebay/98029A1B.JPG
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks a lot.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
Can anybody tell me more about this core memory assembly ?
The assembly consists of three wire-wrapped "BICM9" backplanes, one
of these holds four 8K x 9 core memory boards, the other two contain
several modules with names like "M9INH", "M9SNS" and "M9SEL".
Logic on the various boards appears to be mixed TTL/DTL (!) in
standard DIL packages, most boards are from 1972.
Pictures:
http://www.digischool.nl/~erikb/identify.html
Thanks in advance,
Erik.
Second time around, I won an ELT-320 on ePay... unfortunately, this one
has no PSU. Could one of the owners of one on this list e-mail me
the pinouts? From the auction I _didn't_ win, it appears that it
takes +12VDC @ 2.5A. The question is how/where. The picture seems
to suggest that's it's via a DIN-5 connector at the corner of the
back side.
Thanks for any help.
-ethan
On Feb 11, 15:07, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
> I picked up an Iris 4D/80 'deskside' monster, sans drives, with
digital
> video I/O capabilites and 'analog' video output and 'VTR' control
today
> from Purdue Salvage. I don't have a whole lot of documentation on
the
> system (well, basically none), and about all I do know is that the
> processor board seems to be filled with RAM and it has BNC jacks on
the
> back panel for connection to a monitor.
>
> Can anyone tell me what versions of IRIX might work with this system
> and/or where to pick up a copy? I'd love to see if I could get this
thing
> running again.
It should be capable of running IRIX 5.3, but unless it's unusual and
has more than 16MB of RAM, you'd be better off with 4.0.5 (last version
was 4.0.5f). Also the graphics may not be supported fully in 5.3,
depending on what options you've got. A useful place to start looking
for information is the 4DFAQ (also known as "This Old SGI") which
you'll find at
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/2258/4dfaq.html
Don't forget the comp.sys.sgi.* newsgroups, there are a few people
there who either have or fondly remember the 4D series and can help.
Look on Ebay (yes, really) for IRIX. 5.3 is more common than 4.0.5 but
they do appear fom time to time. I have a 4.0.5 CD which I'd offer to
copy, but some kind soul scratched it rather badly and it won't read
now :-(
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I picked up an Iris 4D/80 'deskside' monster, sans drives, with digital
video I/O capabilites and 'analog' video output and 'VTR' control today
>from Purdue Salvage. I don't have a whole lot of documentation on the
system (well, basically none), and about all I do know is that the
processor board seems to be filled with RAM and it has BNC jacks on the
back panel for connection to a monitor.
Can anyone tell me what versions of IRIX might work with this system
and/or where to pick up a copy? I'd love to see if I could get this thing
running again.
Thanks,
Pat
--
Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS
Information Technology at Purdue
Research Computing and Storage
http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu
The problem with this is that you are totally ignoring
the owners rights in this.
You are treating a program like physical property when
it isn't. It is Intellectual Property.
If you do not purchase a license from the author to
use his work, you are not entitled to own it.
Whether you have made a copy so that nobody else is
deprived of their copy is immaterial.
Something is lost by him/her. His/her rights to
control the distribution of his/her work.
If you don't want to buy it, then you shouldn't have
it.
If you say "F" you, I'm going to take one anyway...
What's the point in having copyright/ownership laws?
If the laws aren't used, respected and enforced..
eventually people will decide not to create cool stuff
because most people will "copy" it (and in your
concept, since they won't buy it anyway... No harm is
being done...), and the author will recieve little to
no compensation for his work.
So, those people will decide to do something where
they will get paid.
If you consistently rob a store, eventually it will go
out of business, and you won't have anything to rob
anymore, not to mention... Actually buy something you
need....
So there is HUGE harm in stealing software by copying
it. Most pirates won't admit to it, because then
they'd have to admit they are bad people, stealing
>from someone/everyone...
This is all elementary business/copyright law. Not an
opinion. It's the basis of all copyright law.
Regards,
Al
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
I've got a couple of ELT-320s. The PS brick says Model PSA-124, input
110v-240v(a)1.5A, output 12v(a)4.2A.
From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
> I know there's others here and on the SBC6120 list that are also
> looking for them now. Hopefully the supply will continue to trickle
> them out now and then.
Hmmm...I'm in on the sbc6120. I was actually thinking of building it into a
terminal case...
Hi Dan.
AFAI can tell from memory, you do the following.
1) find the opening in the front that is a little
larger than the other openings (for cooling).
2) Use a screwdriver to push the plate that is
behind the opening mentioned in 1).
3) While that plate is pushed in, you can lift the
top cover including the electronics of the RA82.
4) In the middle yoy see the large (black) cilinder
thing. That is the HDA. When you stand in front
of the drive you see a small lever at "6 o clock".
Rotate that level 180 degrees to lock the heads.
You must lift the level at the end a little to be
able to rotate it. On the HDA is a text that tells
you the position of the level. (At least, that is
the case with my *RA81*.
5) At the right hand side, near the chassis plate of
the drive is a handle. This handle releases/sets
the drive belt free/tension to the HDA.
I do not know if the tension should be released
when you transport the drive. If you are not going
to use the drive for say, several months, you could
release the tension to prevent deforming (flatten)
the drive belt at one location.
Take care, RA82's are heavy,
- Henk.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Veeneman [mailto:dan@ekoan.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 7 februari 2003 23:04
> To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Disk drive head locking (DEC RA-82 and HP 7920)
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm scheduled to pick up a pair of DEC RA-82 drives along
> with an HP 7920 drive in the next couple of weeks.
>
> I don't have any technical documentation for either of these
> drives, but I'd be very interested in learning the proper
> procedure for locking down the heads on these drives
> prior to moving them. If anyone has the steps to take
> for either or both of these drives, please drop me a note
> or point me to the proper archive.
> Cheers,
>
> Dan
> www.decodesystems.com/wanted.html
Dan's Pics at
http://www.decodesystems.com/old-ics.html
The first white mystery chip is General Instruments ROM. A while back someone
posted a link to an IC-IDentification database which I downloaded. It has
helped me identify some of these older chip logos.
The second mystery chip is an EPROM identical to the ones on a S50 card I
just sold on ebay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=2305518019
Mine were labeled as AMD with an unusual part number. I will leave the pics
up for a while longer.
Now to go look at Dan's want page....
Paxton
Astoria, OR
In a message dated 2/10/03 11:03:12 PM Pacific Standard Time,
philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com writes:
> Would that happen to have been the IC-ID database program from my website?
>
Yes, it is. Sorry for the belated thanks but thanks. I use it occasionally
and it has helped me identify some of the older chips like Dan's (and mine)
General Instrument chips.
Thanks for posting the link so long ago, too.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
Good question,
french dressing, nah - lol
belt dressing - not sure if it even softens the belt
but it does swell the belt.
armor all - may work - might soften the platen - but
it leaves a very slick coating - i wonder if the paper
will stay in one place as the platen moves.
the type "ball" hammer also has a rubber "button" that
slips over it - i know those and the platen were once
replacable - try a search for "teletype" on the web.
i know the nadcomm meseum http://www.nadcomm.com/ has
a link for teletype paper tape and paper on it.
the nadcomm page links are near the bottom under the
heading "Teletypewriter Supplies"
Bill
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 14:51:14 -0700
From: ben franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: asr 33 platen
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
George R. Gonzalez wrote:
> I need some suggestions! Should I try ArmorAll
(known to soften
rubber,
> given time), "Platen cleaner", "belt dressing",
"french dressing", or
what?
I would try 'rubber renue' from M.G. Chemicals. Ben.
--__--__--
I believe it was Alpha Microsystems, and IIRC the PC version was sold
through Radio Shack. I believe I may still have an old AM-610 (S-100) VCR
interface board in the basement if anyone is interested (free to a good
home)...
Larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org]On
> Behalf Of Andrew Strouse
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:09 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: VHS Tapes as storage.
>
>
> Hi, I seem to remember reading in popular electronics, about
> software that
> would let you use a vcr to backup your computer. I think it
> was about 10
> years ago. Does anyone remember or know anything about this.
> My searches on
> google have turned up nothing. Thanks for any help you can provide!
>
> Andrew Strouse
> From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
> It says that the MIPPs ICs are standard MIPPs processors
> but built to Mil-Standards.
That would actually be MIPS processors. The MIPS architecture came out of
Stanford and stands for (supposedly) "Microprocessor without Interlocking
Pipeline Stages".
>>I've actually got some Performance Semi 1750A chipsets...I must think of
>>>something to do with them...
>
> I've got a few as well. I also just found a 1753 (MMU IIRC)
Yup.
> and 1754 (I/O interface IIRC).
Usually called a PIC (peripheral interface controller).
Let me know if you ever want to get rid of those...I have several complete
chipsets, but can always use spares.
> In case you'r enot aware of it, the 1750 is a "standard"
> processor that the government is trying to use in all
> aircraft and aerospace applications.
Well...it was the standard a decade or two ago; the standard came out around
1980, AFAIK. I don't think that there has been a hard requirement for 1750A
in military contracts for a long, long time. It's only a 16-bit processor,
after all, and almost noone makes it any more (Performance doesn't). It,
like the JOVIAL programming language often used to program it, are probably
only around for maintenance and upgrades of existing platforms.
Ken
I put "VCR Backup" into Yahoo!, and this came up...
http://www.viscountvideo.com/danmere.htm
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Al
> From: "Andrew Strouse" <kittstr(a)access-4-free.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: VHS Tapes as storage.
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:09:15 -0500
> Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Hi, I seem to remember reading in popular
> electronics, about software that
> would let you use a vcr to backup your computer. I
> think it was about 10
> years ago. Does anyone remember or know anything
> about this. My searches on
> google have turned up nothing. Thanks for any help
> you can provide!
>
> Andrew Strouse
Well I didn't find the Holy Grail but this is close! I went to a hamfest today and in a box of junk I found the operating program for the HP 9877 Mass Memory unit! That's the box that has up to four tape drives installed and was used to mass duplicate HP 9825 tapes at the HP factory. The 9877 is a rare bird and was only offered to the public for one year (1979 IIRC) but I've got two of the 9877s, Tony D has one and NASA KSC has one but NO ONE has been able to locate the operating program for it till now. The tape APPEARS to be in good condition but you know how HP tapes are :-(
The full name of the tape is "Duplicator 9825A/9877" and it's part number is 09877-10002.
Other INTERESTING finds (in the same box no less!) were a new DC-300A tape (as used on the IBM 5100 and Tektronix 4051), a Plot 50 tape and Plot 50 Backup tape and an Alignment tape. All three are for the Tektronix 4051 computer.
Wahoo! A good ClassiComp day!
Joe
Innfogra(a)aol.com wrote:
> It works with the HP 9825, 9835 & 9845 series of computers from the early
> 1980s. On the other end is an Amphenol 50 pin female connector, similar to
> early SCSI 1 connectors.
WAG from the name: it's a widget to connect a 98x5 into an HP Shared
Resource Management (SRM) network. I vaguely recall that there was a
coaxial SRM bus cable, and some SRM interfaces had the BNC connector
for the bus cable while others had a 50-pin Amphenol connector and
expected to have a transceiver-like device between the Amphenol connector
and the coax.
I've read about this stuff in manuals, but never used it or even seen
it in use. And I didn't know you could hook a 98x5 up to it, my
readings about it have been in the context of HP9000 series 200 and
300 systems.
-Frank McConnell
I have a set of pages about this unit on my website...
http://www.geocities.com/macemulist/nutek.html
I'd like to buy one of these, if I can find one.
If anyone on this list has one in any condition
(hopefully working or repairable), please contact me
off list...
Basically, this was an attempt to clone the Mac
including making a Clone OS.
If you have one of these, I'd love to get copies of
any floppies that came with it, manuals, and a dump of
the ROMS even if you don't want to sell yours.
It would be interesting to see if the ROMS would work
on one of the many Mac Emulators, or could be made to
work.
Regards,
Al Hartman
(Macintosh Emulation List Host)
http://www.topica.com/lists/MacEmuList
Enlightenment means taking full responsibility for
your life.
- William Blake
I seem to have a couple hundred MB15140s in their original Fujitsu IC boxes.
Does anyone have an idea what they are?
Picture at http://members.aol.com/innfosale/MB15140A.JPG
Is there a Fujitsu chip list on the Internet available? Google did not bring
anything up for me.
The date codes are 8809 so they are on topic. I got them from Fujitsu nearly
10 years ago and uncovered them recently. I would not be surprised if they
were for the Fujitsu 8" or 14" hard drives since I bought a lot of new parts
when they dismantled their 8" line in Hillsboro, OR.
Any help appreciated.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
>From: "Bryan Pope" <bpope(a)wordstock.com>
>
>Hey all,
>
> Awhile ago there was a thread about electrolytic capacitors popping and
>then destroying the motherboard they are on. One of the ideas was to
>replace them before they go.
>
> Now I was wondering about another idea... Would it be okay to encase
>the capacitor in silicone gel? Then when the capacitor pops, it wouldn't
>spread its electrolyte all over the motherboard.
>
> But would this cause other problems with heat or something? Would it
>further shorten the life of the capacitor?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bryan
>
Hi
There isn't much you could cover it with that would stop a cap
>from blowing. The pressures can get to several thousand PSI
if there isn't a relief someplace. Wrapping several layers of
paper towel around them might be better. This would at least
keep the mess from the PCB.
There was an article about some bad capacitors made in the
last few years. According to the story, someone stole a formula
for the electrolyte and the formula was missing some key
ingredient ( most likely a depolarizer ). The caps made this
way would out gas and rupture.
Dwight
See below. Contact original sender.
Reply-to: <bernhardbang(a)netscape.net>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:43:03 -0500
From: bernhardbang(a)netscape.net
Subject: Zerox 16/8
Gentlemen,
I have a Zerox 16/8 computer, complete with instruction manuals. Barely
used.
Includes Monitor and keyboard.
Is it of any value?
Do you want it?
Who might want it?
Thank you for your reply!
Bernhard Bang
4208 Wickford Road
Baltimore, MD 21210
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
On Feb 10, 8:03, Paul Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com wrote:
>
> > E8 means they're 128KB, or 1 Megabit. The part numbers you quote
are
> > listed in Compaq Assisted Services online catalogue at $4 apiece,
so
> > you might still be able to get them from DEC/HP.
>
> I am not sure I have the URL for this, unless it is something I know
by
> another name....
Try a web search for "Compaq Assisted Services" or for the 23- part
numbers you quoted? :-)
Or http://www-legacy.digital.com/CAS-Catalog/pric.html
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Feb 10, 10:58, Bryan Pope wrote:
> Awhile ago there was a thread about electrolytic capacitors
popping and
> then destroying the motherboard they are on. One of the ideas was to
> replace them before they go.
>
> Now I was wondering about another idea... Would it be okay to
encase
> the capacitor in silicone gel? Then when the capacitor pops, it
wouldn't
> spread its electrolyte all over the motherboard.
>
> But would this cause other problems with heat or something?
Would it
> further shorten the life of the capacitor?
Well, it's not going to improve its life, and it does mean that when it
goes, it will make a louder bang, since it will be harder for the
electrolyte to get out. Silicone isn't terribly strong, so it won't
stop it. If you look at most electrolytic caps, you'll see they're
designed to come apart under stress without turning into small
grenades; the ends are scored, or the seals are deliberately made less
strong than
the aluminium case.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Feb 8, 11:06, Jim Keohane wrote:
> The reference to "one cycle" instruction may have been referring
> to there being 2 cpu cycles per clock cycle. Also, there's the
"pipelining"
> some say the 6502 does when the last (or only) byte of an instruction
is
> acted upon simultaneous to next instruction's 1st byte (opcode) being
> fetched
>
> So perhaps "one instruction per clock cycle" may be awfully close
with
> pipelining and with use of zero page.
You must be thinking of some different 6502 to the rest of us :-) As
Sellam said, no 6502 opcode takes less than two clock cycles to
execute, and most take more (up to 7): the only 2-cycle instructions
are the ones with implied addressing, like RTS, CLI, TAX, ... This is
why a 6502 running typical well-written code, running on a 2MHz clock,
manages at best around 0.7 MIPS.
There's no pipelining at all in a 6502. No overlap of instructions
whatsoever.
Zero-page instructions like LDA $12 take three clock cycles.
There aren't two CPU cycles per clock cycle. Perhaps you're thinking
of the fact that the 6502 uses a two-phase clock, and does part of the
CPU cycle during phi-1, and part during phi-2?
> Of course, we're talking Apple ]['s which, if I can trust my
memory,
> steal every other clock cycle to refresh memory.
I believe you're thinking of how it uses part of the clock cycle when
the CPU isn't accessing memory, not alternate clock cycles.
> > > p.s. I also did quite well with 6502 asm code in cpu speed tests
vs
> > > 80x86 and Z80 programmers. The zero page, for all intents and
purposes,
> > > is 256 registers.
That was the designers' intention, but you have to remember that it
takes an extra clock cycle to access a zero-page location rather than a
register.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Had I known that I might have bid on the first one that came up on eBay
recently. I thought it might be just a fancy paperweight without the proper
keyboard. I'll watch for a reasonable deal on one of those to show up again
sometime.
>From: Eric Dittman <dittman(a)dittman.net>
>
>The ELT320 can use either an AT-type keyboard or an LK201-type
>keyboard (I have an LK401 connected to mine).
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
>Can anyone tell me exactly what a PACEMIPS PIMM - 33SG144C is? It's
>made byPerformance Semiconductor but it's not listed on their (POOR!)
>website. I THINK it might be an R33000 embedded processor but I'm not
>sure.
Performance Semi, AFAIK, generally does semiconductors for
military/aerospace applications. I recall dimly that they made some
MIL-SPEC MIPS devices; this would perhaps be one of them. The part number
you cite is not familiar, but might be one of the line of R3000+R3010
derivatives. Not as esoteric as their relatively popular MIL-STD-1750A
processors, but unusual none-the-less.
I've actually got some Performance Semi 1750A chipsets...I must think of
something to do with them...
Ken
Hey all,
Awhile ago there was a thread about electrolytic capacitors popping and
then destroying the motherboard they are on. One of the ideas was to
replace them before they go.
Now I was wondering about another idea... Would it be okay to encase
the capacitor in silicone gel? Then when the capacitor pops, it wouldn't
spread its electrolyte all over the motherboard.
But would this cause other problems with heat or something? Would it
further shorten the life of the capacitor?
Cheers,
Bryan
>> Heck, things like the first appearance of Superman get about $15,000, and
>> I would consider that WAY more collectible than the first issue of
>> MacWorld even WITH signatures.
>
>Ummmm.... I believe the going rate for the first appearance of Superman in
>Action Comics #1 is over $100,000....
I can't say I am surprised. Its been a LONG time since I looked into
comic values (I have a box of a few #1's around, but I don't think of
anything worth much).
Either way... MacWorld ain't the first appearance of Superman, heck, it
ain't even the first appearance of the Mac!
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>The people bidding on this magazine have no idea what they're doing. I
>have at least 2-3 copies of this issue (san autographs, but still).
Yeah, I can't imagine it being too rare.
There is a store where I vacation (jersey shore), that sells old
magazines and the likes. With a few odd execptions, nothing ever seems to
go for more than about $50 max. (Exceptions include things like an
unaltered copy of the Traci Lords issue of Penthouse, I think they wanted
$125 for that... although I would think selling it would actually be
illegal since she was under 18 for the shoot).
Heck, things like the first appearance of Superman get about $15,000, and
I would consider that WAY more collectible than the first issue of
MacWorld even WITH signatures.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>>I think anybody that would pay that kind of money without a LOT more
>>proof of authenticity is an idiot! A rich idiot perhaps but an idiot
>>none the less.
>I noticed that the seller has zero feedback so they must be new to E-bay
>(or they've changed their identity). Sounds like a grand formula for a
>rip-off to me!
Unfortunately, a positive feedback (say, in the hundreds) also does
not guarantee that you won't get ripped-off. I recently (well,
November of last year), purchased something through ebay from someone
who had about 140+ for their feedback... and very few negatives.
I sent them the payment for the item ($300+) and although they kept
sending emails about how they were going to get it out to me, with
some extras due to the delay, the person never did ship the item.
His contact information was totally bogus (the mail-to address was
different from what the person had on file with ebay, which I didn't
get until it was too late and I was reporting a problem). The
phone number was no good (again, I didn't have that until there was
a problem).
Now, the person's account is inactive...
So, don't assume anything from a feedback profile value...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | email: mbg at world.std.com |
| | |
| "this space | (s/ at /@/) |
| unavoidably left blank" | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (DEC '77-'98) | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
I have a 19" HP monitor that is free to anyone who can collect, or
arrange collection, from east Berkshire.
This is a 3/5 BNC connected beastie (sync-on-green or separate sync) and
is the perfect companion to a 700 series workstation.
There is some screen-burn , but the monitor is perfectly usable.
This monitor is taking up too much space, so it's time to overcome the
hoarding instinct and pass it on.
Cheers,
Dave.
On Feb 9, 19:24, Brian Chase wrote:
> Does anyone have details on the following ROM or PROM chips from a
> DEC VAXstation 4000 VLC? Their identifying numbers are LUP9327580
> (DEC part# 23-286E8-00) and LUP9331604 (DEC part# 23-287E8-00);
> they're each 40-pin DIPs. The U's may actually be O's or 0's; it's
> difficult to tell given the DEC part number label placement.
23-xxxEx is a ROM/EPROM part number, so they may well be programmable.
E8 means they're 128KB, or 1 Megabit. The part numbers you quote are
listed in Compaq Assisted Services online catalogue at $4 apiece, so
you might still be able to get them from DEC/HP.
Is there any type number under the DEC label? Are they brown ceramic
with a quartz window in the top? If so, they're probably EPROMs, most
likely 27C1024 (64K x 16 bit). If not, they're probably one-time
PROMs, or possibly Flash. If they're EPROMs, it's unlikely you
overwrote them, unless you had them in a programmer.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Just get an HP 200LX palmtop. It's basically a PC-XT (MS-DOS 5.0, custom
80186 processor) with a monochrome CGA screen (640x200). It can run most
standard MS-DOS programs, has built-in terminal emulation, serial and IR
ports, a PCMCIA socket that can handle standard of Compact Flash RAM (cards
bigger than 256MB might require a driver, depending on brand). You can get
upgraded models with up to 96MB internal RAM and a 2x crystal (~32MHz). Runs
on 2 AA batteries for days, and can use rechargable batteries (with internal
charging). Has instant-on and sleep. There is ethernet and TCP/IP software
for it, as well as web and email software. Lastly, you can hook it up to a
cell phone to get your email. Only problem is, it's not quite 10 years old
:).
-----Original Message-----
From: John Boffemmyer IV [mailto:john_boffemmyer_iv@boff-net.dhs.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 7:44 PM
To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Odd ideas that I've had lately...
<snip>
Say, I go over to Sridhar's house
and decide I want to grab the docs on an old DECServer, most palms don't
have the storage space or interface unless you go find a program written
for the machine you are on and have an IR port or happen to have a Palm
cradle for that model (nowadays one cradle does NOT fit all). A mini-PC
portable, like the idea I had, would have standard built-in interfaces that
would allow for this, plus the needed storage space. Like simple FTP'ing
the data over a standard tcp/ip protocol on the built-in Ethernet or such,
this would make portable data sharing easier.
<snip>
Tony,
> While this is true on the genuine PS/2 machines (and the mouse protocol
> is very similar to a PC/AT or PS/2 keyboard protocol), there's no reason
> why it _has_ to be. It would be possible to make an ISA card with a
> programmed microcontroller on it (maybe an 8042, like the keyboard
> controller) with the host port at some otherwise unused I/O address, and
> then use a special driver (similar in concept to the serial and bus mouse
> drivers) to access it.
well, I suppose if you're going to go the microcontroller route you may as well
make it an external unit with the serial controller included... no messing
around with custom drivers on the host system then. Bit beyond me though I'm
afraid, but as the original poster said I'm surprised nobody's done it,
especially a hobbyist...
I suppose it'd need its own power supply though which is a shame.
cheers
Jules
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> I'm either being imprecise or various readings I have done were
>imprecise. The reference to "one cycle" instruction may have been referring
>to there being 2 cpu cycles per clock cycle. Also, there's the "pipelining"
>some say the 6502 does when the last (or only) byte of an instruction is
>acted upon simultaneous to next instruction's 1st byte (opcode) being
>fetched
Hi Everyone,
I have recently researched this but it is not true. The so called
"pipelining"
was just that internally when the CPU does an ADD instructions it
does some sub-operations currently. This was hyped in some texts
by using (wrongly) the word "pipelining". Normally, "pipelining" for micros
refers to
overlaping the fetch of one instruction with the "execute phase" of
the previous instruction. The 6502 does none of this. Note, the Z8
actually does some limited pipelining. This put it ahead in bragging rights
amongs the 8-bitters.
Cheers,
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: <cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org>
To: <cctech(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject: cctech digest, Vol 1 #360 - 29 msgs
> Send cctech mailing list submissions to
> cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cctech-admin(a)classiccmp.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cctech digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+ (Sellam Ismail)
> 2. Re: Unassembled Superboard II (Sellam Ismail)
> 3. Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+ (Sellam Ismail)
> 4. Kaypro II available. (Alan Emmerson)
> 5. Re: WANTED: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel (Eric Dittman)
> 6. Re: interesting find (Tony Duell)
> 7. Re: MicroVAX 3800 Power Cable (Tony Duell)
> 8. Re: Rookie HP-85 problem (Tony Duell)
> 9. Re: Old Computer Companies (John Honniball)
> 10. Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+ (Mike Ford)
> 11. RE: WANTED: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel (John Willis)
> 12. Re: MicroVAX 3800 Power Cable (pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com)
> 13. RE: Looking for source of MFM or RLL drives (Kelly Leavitt)
> 14. RE: Disk drive head locking (DEC RA-82 and HP 7920) (John Willis)
> 15. RE: Looking for source of MFM or RLL drives (John Willis)
> 16. Re: Rookie HP-85 problem (Joe)
> 17. Re: Old computers from HP, maybe? Anybody know where HP is
> collecting/storing them? (Fred Cisin (XenoSoft))
> 18. Re: Old computers from HP, maybe? Anybody know where HP is
> collecting/storing them? (John Allain)
> 19. Re: Looking for source of MFM or RLL drives (Jerome H. Fine)
> 20. Re: Old computers from HP, maybe? Anybody know where HP is
> collecting/storing them? (R. D. Davis)
> 21. RE: Atari ST Help (Lawrence Walker)
> 22. TTY ASR-33 Platen? (George R. Gonzalez)
> 23. Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+ (Jim Keohane)
> 24. Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+ (Jim Keohane)
> 25. Re: Grundy Newbrain fix (lgomez)
> 26. OT Need parts (James Rice)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:27:17 -0800 (PST)
> From: Sellam Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Hans Franke wrote:
>
> > I used BigMac for all my projects, including the doomed SSC
> > ROM... (*1)
> >
> >
> > Gruss
> > H.
> > (*1) I don't know if I already told the story
>
> I told you I would optimize your code for you :)
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at
www.VintageTech.com *
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:34:32 -0800 (PST)
> From: Sellam Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Unassembled Superboard II
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
>
> > Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
> > > Someone sent me an unassembled Ohio Scientific Superboard II kit in
its
> > > original box the other day.
> >
> > Oh! You lucky son-of-a-gun! What REV?
>
> The solder mask on the board says "Ohio Scientific Model 600 CPU" and "REV
> D".
>
> The manual is copyright 1982 and the original invoice is dated August 4,
> 1982.
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at
www.VintageTech.com *
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 15:40:34 -0800 (PST)
> From: Sellam Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Jim Keohane wrote:
>
> > p.s. I also did quite well with 6502 asm code in cpu speed tests vs
> > 80x86 and Z80 programmers. The zero page, for all intents and purposes,
> > is 256 registers. 6502 is single cycle instruction execution. Look up
> > definitions of RISC and the 6502 is arguably RISC-like.
>
> No 6502 instruction takes less than 2 cycles to complete.
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at
www.VintageTech.com *
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Alan Emmerson" <aje(a)technet2000.com.au>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Kaypro II available.
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:44:55 +1000
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> I have two Kaypro II that I have owned from new. Both are upgraded to run
> at higher clock speeds and one has a cooling fan fitted. One has the PC8
> ROM There is a complete set of the bundled distribution software (Select,
> Perfect Writer etc) with manuals, including that really first class
ground
> breaking program SBasic, and other programs that I wrote in SBasic
> including multi variable non linear regression analysis. Also Unidos and
> etc which allows the floppy drives to emulate those of other machines.
>
>
> I used one of these machines to run the first simulation of the CSIRO
> Sydney to Melbourne high speed railway.
>
> What price might one expect for such a a machine?.
>
> Alan Emmerson
> Brisbane QLD
> Australia
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: Eric Dittman <dittman(a)dittman.net>
> Subject: Re: WANTED: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:46:03 -0600 (CST)
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > Wanted: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel
>
> Where are you located?
> --
> Eric Dittman
> dittman(a)dittman.net
> Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: interesting find
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 20:42:32 +0000 (GMT)
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > And when nobody cared about the size, weight and power consumption
> > of computers... ;-)
> >
> > > The HP 9100A/B calculators use a similar architecture, using
> > > wire bobbins instead of rods, for a microsequence store.
>
> The HP9100B was entirely discrete transistors [1], with normal R/W core
> memory, the core-on-a-rope microcde store and inductively coupled PCB
> tracks for the main program ROM.
>
> The HP9810 which replaced it was built from TTL chips, with 256 nybble
> PROMs for the microocde store (and the ALU, which was a couple of
> programmed PROMs), 512 byte ROMs for the main program store, and 256 bit
> DRAMs (1103s) for the R/W memory.
>
> Admittedly the 9810 had space for an internal thermal printer, and it had
> more user memory. But in the basic configuration it did less ('Math'
> functions, like SIN, COS, TAN were on a plug-in ROM module on the 9810,
> and bulit-in on the 9100). But the 9810 (the machine built with ICs) is
> larger than the 9100.
>
> [1] OK, there are 8 IC op-amps in the 9100B on the card reader PCB (read
> amplifier and comparator for the 3 data tracks and the clock track). But
> the machine will run without the card reader ;-)
>
> -tony
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: MicroVAX 3800 Power Cable
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:21:19 +0000 (GMT)
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > On Feb 6, 22:33, Tony Duell wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see how you can do a proper test without a visual inspection
> > of
> > > the connections... And I've yet to see a moulded connector that
> > provides
> > > a proper strain-relief for the cable.
> >
> > A good PAT tester will check at a sensible current (though admittedly a
> > lot only check earth continuity at a proper current). As for strain
>
> I've never met a PAT tester that tests the current-carrying conductors at
> a significant current, mainly because there's no easy way to do this
> without dismantling the unit under test (if the cable is fixed) -- the
> maximum current you could pass would be the normal operating current of
> the unit (by simply applying mains to it), which is not enough. Even then
> you couldn't measure the voltage drop across one of the conductors.
>
> You may have guessed that I don't trust PAT testers, and I have no faith
> at all in the safety standards as usually applied. Proper safety tests on
> the other hand...
>
> > releif, well you're not supposed to swing the equipment by the power
> > cable, Tony!
>
> True, but equally I don't expect the outer covering of the cable to pull
> out of the moulded connector in normal use exposing the single-insulated
> wires inside. Which has happened to many moulded cables round here.
>
> I assume you'd fail a rewirable plug with the cord grip missing/not used
> on an electrical safety test. I certainly would. But most moulded cables
> are not a lot better than that.
>
> > > The cable mounted section looks like a normal 'cold condition'
> > _socket_,
> > > but there are 3 round pins sticking out of the face of it (where the
> > > socket holes would be). The chassis part looks like the normal plug
> > > (recessed into the panel, etc) with 3 holes in it in place of the
> > normal
> > > plug pins.
> >
> > I've a feeling I've seen this used somewhere -- but not recently, and I
> > can't think where :-(
>
> I've thought of another place I've seen them used. Leitz Focomat 1
> enlarger, at the top of the column. Connector for the lampholder assembly.
>
> -tony
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: Rookie HP-85 problem
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:41:27 +0000 (GMT)
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > OK, I took it apart to take alook inside and clean it up. Now I can't
get
> > the damn cover back on.
> > It seems to get caught on the tape eject button. Don't want to break the
> > cover forcing it.
> >
> > Are you supposed to separate the monitor/tape brown faceplate from the
rest
> > of the cover first?
>
> No, pull off the eject button (you should do this before removing the
> cover). Then the cover fits easily. Put the button back on when the cover
> is screwed in place.
>
> -tony
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 00:08:16 +0000
> From: John Honniball <coredump(a)gifford.co.uk>
> Organization: Stoke Gifford Computer Museum
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Old Computer Companies
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Hans B Pufal wrote:
> >> Eliott computers from UK. What happened to them? I mean Eliott, not
N...a
>
> There are a few Elliot 803s preserved in Britain. One at Bletchley
> Park, another at the Science Museum, and probably others. They have
> an interesting power supply: the incoming mains is used to charge
> a *big* Ni-Cd battery, which powers the computer. The same battery
> is used in the Nimrod aircraft, and the RAF have kindly supplied
> spares for the 803s.
>
> --
> John Honniball
> coredump(a)gifford.co.uk
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:03:12 -0800
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> From: Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > > Get a copy of BigMac, and go ahead. it's a nice all in one
> > > environment, and works fine on every Apple.
> >
> >Oh Yeah! BigMac (or as we used to call it at Software Productions,
> >"BigHack").
>
>
> My favorite was always LISA, Laser Interactive Symbolic Assembler, a
> complete editor/asm/runtime kind of setup.
>
> I need to look around and figure what the status is of the program, but I
> have most of the versions of it that ever existed.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> Subject: RE: WANTED: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:02:00 -0700
> From: "John Willis" <jwillis(a)arielusa.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> New Mexico, USA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dittman
> Sent: Fri 2/7/2003 4:46 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: WANTED: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel
>
> > Wanted: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel
>
> Where are you located?
> --
> Eric Dittman
> dittman(a)dittman.net
> Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
>
> [demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:24:44 GMT
> From: pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: MicroVAX 3800 Power Cable
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> On Feb 7, 23:21, Tony Duell wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 22:33, Tony Duell wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't see how you can do a proper test without a visual
> inspection
> > > of
> > > > the connections... And I've yet to see a moulded connector that
> > > provides
> > > > a proper strain-relief for the cable.
> > >
> > > A good PAT tester will check at a sensible current (though
> admittedly a
> > > lot only check earth continuity at a proper current). As for
> strain
> >
> > I've never met a PAT tester that tests the current-carrying
> conductors at
> > a significant current, mainly because there's no easy way to do this
> > without dismantling the unit under test (if the cable is fixed) --
> the
> > maximum current you could pass would be the normal operating current
> of
> > the unit (by simply applying mains to it), which is not enough. Even
> then
> > you couldn't measure the voltage drop across one of the conductors.
>
> A proper PAT tester to current standards has a socket for each end of
> an IEC cable, and each cable is supposed to be individually tested with
> both ends plugged in to the tester.
>
> > > releif, well you're not supposed to swing the equipment by the
> power
> > > cable, Tony!
> >
> > True, but equally I don't expect the outer covering of the cable to
> pull
> > out of the moulded connector in normal use exposing the
> single-insulated
> > wires inside. Which has happened to many moulded cables round here.
>
> I've only seen one do that -- and it was an instant candidate for the
> wirecutters at both ends. A proper visual inspection is supposed to be
> the first part of the PAT.
>
> > I assume you'd fail a rewirable plug with the cord grip missing/not
> used
> > on an electrical safety test. I certainly would.
>
> Yes. The first thing I do with any multiblock is take it apart to see
> how the ends are wired -- the cheap ones are usually in a condition
> where I feel compelled to re-do the job.
>
> --
> Pete Peter Turnbull
> Network Manager
> University of York
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 13
> From: Kelly Leavitt <CCTalk(a)catcorner.org>
> To: "'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org '" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: RE: Looking for source of MFM or RLL drives
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 20:12:08 -0500
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Yes, the OS allows entering of drive geometry. Actually only supports MFM
up
> to 70Meg. RLL drives will of course work, just not to RLL capacity. I'm
> looking for the largest drives I can find.
>
> From: Ethan Dicks
> --- Kelly Leavitt <CCTalk(a)catcorner.org> wrote:
> > Any good sources of MFM or RLL drives. This would be for a Tandy 6000
> > running Xenix.
> >
> > I'm looking for 70 Meg or higher MFM (110 RLL capacity).
>
> Hmm... those aren't so common (in the DEC world, there are two
> choices - the RD53 (Miniscribe 1325) and the RD54 (Maxtor XT2190).
>
> I take it you aren't constrained by a narrow set of expected
> geometries? (i.e. - you have a running system and/or the install
> procedure asks you about the drive rather than assuming?)
>
> -ethan
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 14
> Subject: RE: Disk drive head locking (DEC RA-82 and HP 7920)
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:37:25 -0700
> From: "John Willis" <jwillis(a)arielusa.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> I seem to have only up to RA81, but everything else :(
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Veeneman
> Sent: Fri 2/7/2003 3:04 PM
> To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
> Cc:
> Subject: Disk drive head locking (DEC RA-82 and HP 7920)
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm scheduled to pick up a pair of DEC RA-82 drives along
> with an HP 7920 drive in the next couple of weeks.
>
> I don't have any technical documentation for either of these
> drives, but I'd be very interested in learning the proper
> procedure for locking down the heads on these drives
> prior to moving them. If anyone has the steps to take
> for either or both of these drives, please drop me a note
> or point me to the proper archive.
>
> They've already been warehoused, so it might be too late,
> but I'd like to be as safe as I can.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dan
> www.decodesystems.com/wanted.html
>
> [demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 15
> Subject: RE: Looking for source of MFM or RLL drives
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:43:20 -0700
> From: "John Willis" <jwillis(a)arielusa.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> I have an RD54 available... no idea whether its working.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelly Leavitt
> Sent: Fri 2/7/2003 6:12 PM
> To: 'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org '
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: Looking for source of MFM or RLL drives
>
> Yes, the OS allows entering of drive geometry. Actually only supports
> MFM up
> to 70Meg. RLL drives will of course work, just not to RLL capacity. I'm
> looking for the largest drives I can find.
>
> From: Ethan Dicks
> --- Kelly Leavitt <CCTalk(a)catcorner.org> wrote:
> > Any good sources of MFM or RLL drives. This would be for a Tandy 6000
> > running Xenix.
> >
> > I'm looking for 70 Meg or higher MFM (110 RLL capacity).
>
> Hmm... those aren't so common (in the DEC world, there are two
> choices - the RD53 (Miniscribe 1325) and the RD54 (Maxtor XT2190).
>
> I take it you aren't constrained by a narrow set of expected
> geometries? (i.e. - you have a running system and/or the install
> procedure asks you about the drive rather than assuming?)
>
> -ethan
>
> [demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had
a name of winmail.dat]
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 21:27:05
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: Rookie HP-85 problem
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Pull on the tape eject button. It's mounted on a stud and will pull right
off. Just push it back on to re-install it.
>
> Joe
>
> At 01:11 PM 2/7/03 -0500, you wrote:
> >OK, I took it apart to take alook inside and clean it up. Now I can't get
> >the damn cover back on.
> >It seems to get caught on the tape eject button. Don't want to break the
> >cover forcing it.
> >
> >Are you supposed to separate the monitor/tape brown faceplate from the
rest
> >of the cover first?
> >
> >HELP
> >
> >RH
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 20:13:09 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Old computers from HP, maybe? Anybody know where HP is
> collecting/storing them?
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > Hewlett-Packard is hoping a little green will help make computer owners
> > recycle more of their old tech gear. The computer maker is testing a
>
> no, they are hoping that a little green will help make computer owners get
> rid of their "old" tech gear and buy more new stuff.
>
>
> > meets the charities' minimum standards. "For the most part what we get
in
> > here is pretty darn old," St. Denis said. HP's recycling program accepts
>
> . . . some of it is as much as two years old!!!!
>
>
> A while back, HP began to "recycle" toner cartridges for the purpose of
> making fewer empties available for refilling (which competes with their
> new cartridge sales).
>
>
> What do YOU think their primary motivation is??
>
>
> "Re: Old computers from HP, maybe?"
> ^^^^
> It is a ONE-WAY process, of old computers going TO HP to remove them from
> circulation.
>
>
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin(a)xenosoft.com
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 18
> From: "John Allain" <allain(a)panix.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Old computers from HP, maybe? Anybody know where HP is
> collecting/storing them?
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:28:25 -0500
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> > A while back, HP began to "recycle" toner cartridges for the
> > purpose of making fewer empties available for refilling (which
> > competes with their new cartridge sales).
>
> New cartridge sales?? I bought one of their "New" cartridges.
> Here's what the small print says:
> "This newly manufactured product may contain parts and
> materials recovered from the HP Printing Supplies Return
> and Recycling Program."
>
> > What do YOU think their primary motivation is??
>
> Selling refills themselves, But just Calling them new.
>
> John A.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 23:59:51 -0500
> From: "Jerome H. Fine" <jhfinepw4z(a)compsys.to>
> Organization: Just Sufficient
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for source of MFM or RLL drives
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> >Kelly Leavitt wrote:
>
> > > I'm looking for 70 Meg or higher MFM (110 RLL capacity).
> > Hmm... those aren't so common (in the DEC world, there are two
> > choices - the RD53 (Miniscribe 1325) and the RD54 (Maxtor XT2190).
>
> Jerome Fine replies:
>
> By the way, the RD53 is a Micropolis 1325 or 1335 with the
> R7 jumper added to the logic board. Otherwise, the DEC
> RQDX2 will not recognize the drive. I have never tried them
> on the RQDX3 without the R7 jumper, but it might be possible -
> probably NOT.
>
> And while there may still be rare occasions when you can actually
> complete the FORMAT required for an RD53, I would recommend
> that they be used ONLY for scratch at this point at the end of their
> life cycle. I suppose that there might still be the odd RD53 that is
> still living a good life, but most (almost all) have become so unreliable
> that I strongly recommend NOT using them for any files you care to
> see the next time you turn the computer on.
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Jerome Fine
> --
> If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
> address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
> e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
> obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
> 'at' with the four digits of the current year.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 20
> Date: 8 Feb 2003 00:57:58 -0500
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 00:57:58 -0500
> From: "R. D. Davis" <rdd(a)rddavis.org>
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Old computers from HP, maybe? Anybody know where HP is
> collecting/storing them?
> Organization: why?
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Quothe Fred Cisin (XenoSoft), from writings of Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at
08:13:09PM -0800:
> > > Hewlett-Packard is hoping a little green will help make computer
owners
> > > recycle more of their old tech gear. The computer maker is testing a
> >
> > no, they are hoping that a little green will help make computer owners
get
> > rid of their "old" tech gear and buy more new stuff.
>
> Wasn't HP the company that was saving and preserving the "vintage"
> computer equipment turned back in to them? I think I read something
> about this on their web site, or somewhere, about a year or two ago.
> That's not to say they weren't scrapping newer equipment, however, and
> I don't recall reading how old the equipment had to be to qualify for
> preservation.
>
> > What do YOU think their primary motivation is??
> >
> >
> > "Re: Old computers from HP, maybe?"
> > ^^^^
> > It is a ONE-WAY process, of old computers going TO HP to remove them
from
> > circulation.
>
> Yep... even the vintage ones if they still save them from being
> scrapped; surely they still get sent off to a warehouse somewhere to
> keep them out of circulation. Speaking of circulation, an HP-3000
> Series III computer running MPE-IV was used to process data for the
> circulation department of the Baltimore Sun back around 1990... it was
> quite a contrast to see that, and it's disk farm, right across the
> room from a sea of big blue cabinets for an IBM mainframe system.
>
> --
> Copyright (C) 2002 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other
animals:
> All Rights Reserved an unnatural belief that we're above Nature
&
> rdd(a)rddavis.org 410-744-4900 her other creatures, using dogma to justify
such
> http://www.rddavis.org beliefs and to justify much human cruelty.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 21
> From: "Lawrence Walker" <lgwalker(a)mts.net>
> To: "Jeffrey S. Worley" <Technoid(a)30below.com>, cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 23:27:36 -0600
> Subject: RE: Atari ST Help
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Hmmm how did my address get into this ?
> As the old flame went "check your attributes"
> and in this case your deletions.
>
> Lawrence
>
> On 7 Feb 2003, , Jeffrey S. Worley wrote:
>
> > BTW, the Link II's they are selling are NEW. Call and ask or
> > leave an email. I just checked their catalog. The link I
> > bough was from them IIRC. It came in it's original packaging
> > and was perfect in all respects. Still is perfect though now
> > used... ;-)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > > Yes, I know about that site, but they want WAY too
> > > much money for a used adapter for an old computer.
> > >
> > > You would think that at this point, they'd be...
> >
> >
> >
> > lgwalker@ mts.net
>
>
> lgwalker@ mts.net
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 22
> From: "George R. Gonzalez" <grg(a)umn.edu>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: TTY ASR-33 Platen?
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 07:59:24 -0800
> Organization: Hearing Research Lab
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> I have been blessed with *two* Teletype ASR-33's. Apart from a minor
> cleaning, they are going to be just fine. EXCEPT the rubber platens are
as
> hard as Chinese arithmetic! In case you havent experienced this, if the
> platen gets hard, the printer doesnt print well-- the typehead kinda
bounces
> off the paper and doesnt leave a clean dark mark.
>
> I've tried the usual remedies-- acetone cleans them up, but they're still
> rock hard.
>
> I need some suggestions! Should I try ArmorAll (known to soften rubber,
> given time), "Platen cleaner", "belt dressing", "french dressing", or
what?
>
> Note that I don't need to clean or make it "grippier", it needs to be
> softened, a lot.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> George
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 23
> From: "Jim Keohane" <jimkeo(a)multi-platforms.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:06:13 -0500
> Organization: Multi-Platforms, Inc.
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Sellam Ismail,
>
> I'm either being imprecise or various readings I have done were
> imprecise. The reference to "one cycle" instruction may have been
referring
> to there being 2 cpu cycles per clock cycle. Also, there's the
"pipelining"
> some say the 6502 does when the last (or only) byte of an instruction is
> acted upon simultaneous to next instruction's 1st byte (opcode) being
> fetched
>
> So perhaps "one instruction per clock cycle" may be awfully close with
> pipelining and with use of zero page.
>
> Of course, we're talking Apple ]['s which, if I can trust my memory,
> steal every other clock cycle to refresh memory.
>
> Cheers, - Jim
>
> Jim Keohane, Multi-Platforms, Inc.
>
> "It's not whether you win or lose. It's whether you win!"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sellam Ismail" <foo(a)siconic.com>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 18:40
> Subject: Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+
>
>
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Jim Keohane wrote:
> >
> > > p.s. I also did quite well with 6502 asm code in cpu speed tests vs
> > > 80x86 and Z80 programmers. The zero page, for all intents and
purposes,
> > > is 256 registers. 6502 is single cycle instruction execution. Look up
> > > definitions of RISC and the 6502 is arguably RISC-like.
> >
> > No 6502 instruction takes less than 2 cycles to complete.
> >
> > Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
> Festival
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > International Man of Intrigue and Danger
> http://www.vintage.org
> >
> > * Old computing resources for business and academia at
> www.VintageTech.com *
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 24
> From: "Jim Keohane" <jimkeo(a)multi-platforms.com>
> To: <cctech(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Assembly on a Apple IIc+
> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:13:14 -0500
> Organization: Multi-Platforms, Inc.
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Not sure if this was mentioned as another option:
>
> There's the MERLIN assembler. Versions for ProDos and DOS 3.3.
>
> - Jim
>
> Jim Keohane, Multi-Platforms, Inc.
>
> "It's not whether you win or lose. It's whether you win!"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Hudson" <rhudson(a)cnonline.net>
> To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 00:19
> Subject: Assembly on a Apple IIc+
>
>
> > What do I need to get started with 6502 Assembly on an apple II?
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 25
> From: "lgomez" <lgomez(a)cdromsa.es>
> Subject: Re: Grundy Newbrain fix
> To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 17:31:42 +0100
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> Please, can you say me how can i solve this problem? I've a
> Newbrain AD with the same problem.
>
> Regards
>
> On Fri, 07 Feb 2003 17:43:50 +0100
> Torben Ring <toring(a)inet.uni2.dk> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a Grundy Newbrain, which wouldn't start, or if it
> > started it would only show random chars in the display.
> > I've found out what was wrong with the machine and if
> > anyone needs help with fixing his (or hers) machine, I'll
> > be able to point to the problem. As far as I can tell,
> > this is a common problem with all these machines, and it
> > only gets worse as time goes by.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Torben Ring
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 26
> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 11:28:06 -0600
> From: James Rice <jrice54(a)charter.net>
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: OT Need parts
> Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
> I need one of the beige plastic headed screws that secure the side cover
> on a Dell Dimension case. The is for my UMAX S900 that shares a
> PaloAlto Design case with the earlier Dell Dimensions. I also need two
> blank drive filler panels for a HP NetServer LC II.
>
> James
> --
> http://webpages.charter.net/jrice54/classiccomp2.html
>
>
>
> End of cctech Digest
Hello,
I just thought of something which might be of interest to someone out there. Several years ago I got ahold of a monsterous main-frame type hard drive. I really have no idea what kind of system it came from, but the box was about three feet long, one foot tall, and one foot wide (as I remember it). The disks inside were about 8-10 inches across (I could see them through a little window in the casing). You could turm two screw like things on the front of the box and then lift the cover. Inside was the disk assembly and then another panel of electronics that would swing down from the cover of the box. This whole monster weighed about 60 pounds or so I would say. On the back were two receptacles for connecting it to whatever computer it originally came from. The plugs that plugged into the recepticles were sqaure as I remember it and there was a flat 1" wide cable that came out of each plug. The cables had been cut off of so I don't know what the other end looked like. On the front of the box there were two or three buttons I think. Probably one reset, one power on/off, and one lock/unlock--that's what I seem to recall. Anyway, I took this hard drive back where I got it from because I couldn't figure out any use for it. But if any of you know how to connect this thing to something and are interested in it I may be able to get it back again. It's been out in the weather for several years, but from my experience wheather doesn't affect computers much--the older ones at least. I have gotten some computers that were snowed and rained on and had mud splattered all over them, but they still worked. There was even one computer I got where the battery had leaked all over the mother board and started to eat it away.....but it still worked!! Needless to say, I was amazed!!
Well, let me know if you are intersted in this hard drive. I am raising money for a mission trip and that's part of the reason I wondering if this has any value to anybody. Also I hate to see it "rot" out there. ;-) I can't send you any pictures of the drive itself because I don't have it right now, but I think I do have the cable lying around here yet. I could send pics of that or try to describe it if that would help any. By the way, I think the brand name on this device may have been "Digital"; I could be wrong, but a lot of the other parts I got there were made by the "Digital" company so I suspect the hard drive may have been too. (I also have a large plug-in electronics board from some main-frame type computer that I got at the same place if anybody has an interest in that).
I know old main-frame parts have value to the right person and I wouldn't mind trying to get it if someone is interested, but please be sure you are really seriously interested before you ask me to get it! :-) It is more than likely buried under a lot of junk and I would have to dig it out which could be quite a job!! But I would be more than willing to try and get it if you are seriously interested; I just don't want to go through all that work and then be stuck with it myself. :-)
I can try to describe it better if that would help, but I'll wait to see if anybody has an interest first.
Take care all,
Shawn
:-) Smile, God loves you!!
Onwers of DEC Qbus or UniBus boxes; It may interest you to know that I've put up a pair of DEC'ish card extenders for auction on E-pay. Here's the link:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=3401378577
There's a dual-height and a quad-height, selling as a pair, starting at $10.00.
Thanks for putting up with another ad. ;-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
ARS KC7GR (Formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77 -- kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates that it would be superior
to what I have now..." (Taki Kogoma, aka Gym Z. Quirk)
On Feb 9, 9:52, Adrien Farkas wrote:
> _these_ 'simplex' aren't really simples, they're duplex, but
connected
> not side by side, but opposite, which makes a need to cut all my sc
> cables into two simplex, which I'd like to avoid. I called it
'simplex',
> because I wasn't able to describe it properly.
Oh, I see. Yes, hard to describe concisely, I suppose they're a sort
of "dual simplex" ;-)
> hmm, i might to move to STs, but ut's fddi cabling systems and all my
> cards are either SC or MIC (FDDI), so I might need bunch of ST cables
> and pigtails. sure, ebay is my friend, but you know, shipping this
stuff
> to europe is quite expensive ;) and I have lots of fddi & sc cables
> already, just missing some stuff to connect it together, this is wher
> the couplers come.
The fibre in my house and workshop is 50/125 FDDI stuff recovered from
work. We don't use FDDI any more so I liberated several 10-metre and
20-metre patch cables, cut off the MICs, and re-terminated them with
STs. The tools and materials I needed to do that cost about ?100 from
TechOptics (luckily, I could borrow a microscope, so I didn't have to
buy that) and it's not hard to do. TechOptics don't have prices on
their website but they're much cheaper than most catalogues, and quite
helpful on the phone. http://www.techoptics.com
It took two evenings to reterminate 4 cables, both ends. One evening
to strip, wait an hour to let them rest, then crimp and epoxy the STs;
the second evening to cleave and polish the ends. I kept a few shorter
cables that are ST-to-MIC and acquired a few ST-to-SC cables when I got
my ATM kit. Even most of my FDDI kit uses ST or SC connectors; the
only thing I have with MIC connectors (other than adaptors for SGI FDDI
cards) is an ATM-to-FDDI bridge.
I've not done it myself, but someone I know has done a lot of splicing
with gel-filled splices, which are quite cheap (though you really need
a splice box as well). You can get them from TechOptics too.
However, if you already have most of the cables you need, and just want
a few couplers, just buy the couplers.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
A couple of days ago I posted for auction a bunch of HP-85 stuff. More to
come as I find it. Includes ROM pacs, a 128K memory pac and a GP-IO & serial
interfaces.
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItems&include=0&
userid=innfosale&sort=3&rows=25&since=-1&rd=1
my seller name is innfosale
Thanks for putting up with the post.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
I was sitting at home reading my latest copy of Mouser (component catalog)
and I came across LCD GUI touch screen kits and Zilog Z80 kits with USB,
Serial and 100Mbit Ethernet. My head being screwed up from pain killers (on
worker's comp from slipping on ice at a client's), tried to put 2+5
together to get 4 and gave me an expensive (maybe not) idea. Palms and
Visors and the like are really small and great for many tasks, but what if
I could take a similar processor, say a Dragonball, an ARM or the even an
older one (maybe even a mobile RISC-based CPU - now that would be cool) and
link them into a slightly larger and more useful hand-held that has USB,
Serial and Ethernet with AD and DC capabilities and toss it into a steel
box with rubber seals and rubber/knurled steel outsides and a thin plastic
piece covering the display with a metal lock-back cover. I know there are
knock-off covers out there for the Visor and the Palm that are sold
separately, but the palm doesn't have built in USB or Ethernet or Serial,
you are stuck with a bulky add-on or a cradle. What If someone could get
around that? Anyone have some thoughts to it?
Next leap into less than sanity...
I actually considered sitting down and getting a prototype board from
another mail order company the other day to build my own AT P200MMX
motherboard with PC100/133 SD-RAM support, AGPx and ISA/PCI. Now here's
where the idea for this would require the prototype board: built in USB and
Ethernet and possibly SCSI on a standard AT board in as small a size as
possible while enabling use of as many slots in the back of an AT case for
the AGPx, PCI and ISA. I was thinking of using something like an AMD-based
Ethernet chip with the prototype board's VIA motherboard chipset. Anyone
have comments?
Kind of lame or just expensive and nuts?
-John Boffemmyer IV
----------------------------------------
Founder, Lead Writer, Tech Analyst
and Web Designer Boff-Net Technologies
http://boff-net.dhs.org/index.html
---------------------------------------
>> ... Leisure Suit Larry 1, too.
>
>Hey! I still have LSL1 1.0 - 5.25" original disks, not a copy (fished it
>out of a pile of debris left by a departing college student a number of
>years ago)
>
>It's... um... a *classic*!
Ah, but do you have "SoftPorn" the game that LSL-1 was a rip off of? I
played that on my Apple II eons ago (I just saw it on one of the game
archive links that passed thru this list recently in anyone wanted to DL
it)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On Feb 7, 13:44, Adrien Farkas wrote:
> pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com (pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com) wrote :
>
> >SMAs suck big time, and couplers for STs are expensive.
^^
Oops, did I really write that? I meant that couplers for SCs are
expensive; ST couplers are cheap.
> a propos fiber couplers, does anyone have a few they might miss? I'm
> after SC/SC couplers preferrably with direct SC duplex connector
> pluggable. I might get a few, but those aren't ready for duplex
> connectors, just single SC simplex.
Duplex ones are just two simplex ones side by side. Use tape or glue.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I recently acquired a California Computer Systems model 2422 Floppy Disk
Controller Rev B. (S-100) in what appears to be good condition but
missing a 2716 EPROM presumably containing the onboard BIOS.
Does anyone have this card and the capability of providing me with a
copy of the PROM or at least a dump of it? I'd also love to get my
hands on the docs, if available.
Thank you,
Erik
Hi,
While hauling some VAX and StorageWorks stuff yesterday, I bumped
into a Philips PTS6000 machine (actually, two.. a larger one, and
a smaller one), some HP stuff (looks like HP Big Iron) and the
cabinet of a DECarray system.
Anyone interested? Pics available.
--fred
I was wondering if there ever was a PC PS2 type mouse addon card for old 386
or previous AT type computers?
I know there were bus mice, but thats not the same.
The reason I am asking is because I have a PS2 KVM switch and want to get my
386/DX40 computer connected to it (it doesnt have a ps2 header).
On Feb 9, 10:55, Eric Smith wrote:
> > Are you sure? My understanding is that PLP and PLA increment the
stack
> > pointer *before* fetching the byte off the stack.
> [...]
> > Maybe you're thinking of PHP and PHA ([SP]:=A; SP:=SP+1), which
take one
> > cycle less than PLP/PLA?
>
> You're right, I was confused.
Phew! I was beginning to wonder if the 6502 is more bizarre than I
already knew :-) You missed the mistake though -- I should have
written SP:=SP-1 (no it wasn't a test, I only just noticed).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Feb 8, 19:02, Eric Smith wrote:
> Well, I haven't counted them, but pretty much all instructions that
> use the ALU do that. This includes ADC, SBC, ORA, AND, EOR, BIT,
> and (when the accumulator is the destination) LSL, ASR, ROR, and ROL.
> And the PLP and PLA instructions, which increment the stack pointer
> using the ALU during the next fetch.
Are you sure? My understanding is that PLP and PLA increment the stack
pointer *before* fetching the byte off the stack. The 6502 stack
pointer always points to the next free location on the stack. It's
possible that it does something like:
fetch instruction
decode, and set up ALU to generate SP+1
fetch [SP+1]
add 1 to SP while fetching next instruction
Maybe you're thinking of PHP and PHA ([SP]:=A; SP:=SP+1), which take
one cycle less than PLP/PLA?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
PS2 works off the keyboard controller, I was hoping somebody might have made
a specialty board with keyboard controller allowing older machines to use
ps2 hardware
----- Original Message -----
From: +ACI-John Allain+ACI- +ADw-allain+AEA-panix.com+AD4-
To: +ADw-cctalk+AEA-classiccmp.org+AD4-
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: PS2 Mouse
+AD4- +AD4- I could use a USB +AD0APg- PS/2 mouse adapter, so far I have not
+AD4- +AD4- found any such animal. I've found plenty that go the other way.
+AD4-
+AD4- Think this is one. It isn't a passthru.
+AD4- http://www.cyberguys.com/cgi-bin/sgin0101.exe?T1+AD0-131+-0870
+AD4-
+AD4-
+AD4- On the subject...
+AD4- I see a lot of PS/2-female to RS232/D9-male adaptors.
+AD4- I assume that these are for signal sensing mice,
+AD4- since these adaptors Are passthru, and I get the impression
+AD4- from this list that PS/2 signals aren't RS232.
+AD4-
+AD4- John A.
Hi,
I have a large binder containing a DEC PDP11 RSX-11M System Generation and
Management Guide, version 3.2, June 1979. Also included is a RSX-11M/M-Plus
MCR Operation Manual and two bound mini references. All are in excellent
shape. Best offer + shipping.
Thanks Norm
>I'd hate to
>hose the PalmOS flash - dunno if there's a way to get it back without
>building your own external re-Flasher (in the case of the IIIs and older
>that *have* removable SIMMs).
I think they may have an ability to recover built in.
I know when I upgraded the OS on my wife's IIIx, I had a problem with the
upgrade, and the flash didn't complete. The Palm wouldn't boot and I
thought I was hosed. But a check in the directions offered a recover
method. There is a sequence of button presses you can do that drops the
Palm into "debugger" mode, and from there, the upgrade utility could
restart the flash process and write the OS again.
Of course, you would need a copy of the Flash ROM/OS and a utility to
write it. I know you can dump your current ROM to file with the tools in
the Palm Emulator available from Palm... but the only tool I know to
write it back to the Palm is their OS upgrade tool, which means you would
have to shell out for the upgrade (or find someone else that already did
and use the software that they have).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I have been searching for info of an old laptop computer i have .
Following details are all i have found:
Attache' Forefront 286
model : LV-286D
power supply : 17Volt ? 2.7Amp ?
Battery : 12Volt 2200mAH NiCAD
3 pin connector - 9.8"x2.1"x1.1"
Has detachable keyboard.
Does any know if manufacturer was taken over by another?
Need details of power supply and battery connector pollarity and or gifs of
same .
Don't know where else to look.
Thanks Paul
On Feb 8, 11:41, Eric Smith wrote:
> Pete wrote:
> > You must be thinking of some different 6502 to the rest of us :-)
As
> > Sellam said, no 6502 opcode takes less than two clock cycles to
> > execute, and most take more (up to 7): the only 2-cycle
instructions are
> > the ones with implied addressing, like RTS, CLI, TAX, ...
>
> Not RTS, that takes a bunch.
Oops, wrong column! Yes, it takes 6.
> There is a little bit of pipelining internally, but it's not really
> obvious. The last ALU operation of an instruction is generally done
> during the same clock cycle as the fetch of the next instruction.
> For instance, when you do an "ADC #35" instruction (add with carry
> immediate), it's a two-cycle instruction, but it really takes three
> cycles to complete -- the third cycle is overlapped with the
following
> instruction's fetch. During the first cycle the opcode is fetched,
> during the second cycle the immediate operand is fetched, and during
the
> third cycle, which is the first cycle of the next instruction, the
actual
> add occurs.
True. Most instructions don't work like that, though.
> > There aren't two CPU cycles per clock cycle. Perhaps you're
thinking of
> > the fact that the 6502 uses a two-phase clock, and does part of the
CPU
> > cycle during phi-1, and part during phi-2?
>
> Perhaps the original poster thought that, but it's just the old
standard
> two-phase NMOS logic. It takes two phases to do just about anything
> internally, so it's not a matter of doing two things sequentially in
> one clock cycle. (A small number of things occur in parallel in some
> cycles, though.)
Yes, *I* know that, but I don't think Jim did :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I am looking for a copy of the manual of jumber/switch
settings and pinout's of the ast cc 232 async/sync
serial card.
looking at the jumper page (after the link was posted)
i found nothing.
jpg scans to my email would be great - just attach
them.
n8uhn at yahoo dot com (replace the "'dot" with "."
and "at"' with "@"
Thanks,
Bill
On Feb 8, 16:12, Jim Keohane wrote:
> I'll type more slowly:
>
> Question #1:
>
> If an instruction that takes two cpu cycles (as Sellam Ismail
cited as a
> minimum) and there are 2 cpu cycles per clock cycle then how many
clock
> cycles did this one instruction take?
>
> Answer: one.
NO. There NOT two CPU cycles per clock cycle. Sellam cited two CLOCK
cycles minimum per instruction. He is correct. I've been been
building 6502-based devices and programming 6502 code on and off since
1981, and I suspect Sellam has been arund 6502s nearly as long; we're
both accustomed to calculating how many cycles routines take. The 6502
uses several clock cycles per CPU cycle -- if by cycle you mean a
fetch-execute cycle. That's exactly the opposite of what you're
claiming.
> OK. OK. I'm being cute. But the 6502, sans Woz's Apple ][
> sneakiness for video, can do two memory fetches per clock cycle.
No, it can't. Go read the data sheet. The *system* can, providing
your memory is fast enough that you can run it twice as fast as the CPU
-- which the Apple and some other machines did -- and providing you
have *something else* (eg, the video) doing its memory access only
during the clock phase that the 6502 doesn't use for memory access. It
is the clock edges that trigger the 6502 to perform the memory access.
> Question #2:
>
> If someone writes "pipelining" and encloses it within quotes does
that
> indicate to you that the term is being used, well, advisably?
>
> Answer: Visit groups.google.com and search for "pipelining" and
6502 (or
> related processor).
[...]
> =====excerpt 3=======================
>
> The 6502 _IS_ pipelined, but in ways that are not very dramatic or
even
> obvious
> unless you look at the CPU's internal operation in detail. Rockwell
touted
> the
> pipelining in their 6502 user's guide years ago, it is essentially
this:
>
> When you do a ADC of something, the last cycle of the instruction is
when
> the
> actual data byte is read in, right? Immediately after that the next
opcode
> is
> read so the next instruction has started, right? So when did the 6502
add?
>
> It added while the next opcode was being read. The accumulator does
not
> actually hold the new value until sometime during the second half
(forget
> exactly where) of the opcode cycle of the next instruction.
>
> That's pipelining. It saves you a cycle on every instruction that
does an
> ALU
> operation. It may not be as spectacular as what's being done on the
monster
> RISCs these days but it is essentially pipelining.
Yes, but only on a small number of the instructions. I'm sure other
microprocessors of the day did that, Rockwell marketing not
withstanding.
> I'd say you got me on the "one cycle per instruction" but you
jumped the
> gun on the pipelining issue. OK?
Well, maybe, but the 6502 is not basically a pipelined processor, in
the sense that only a few instructions do anything close to pipelining,
and not even all the intructions that use the ALU do so.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Can anyone tell me exactly what a PACEMIPS PIMM - 33SG144C is? It's made by Performance Semiconductor but it's not listed on their (POOR!) website. I THINK it might be an R33000 embedded processor but I'm not sure.
Joe
Lawrence,
I found an old message from you in the CC archives while I was searching for info on the Micom 2000. In the message you said that you have a Micom 2000. Can you tell me what kind of disks it uses? I know that they're hard sectored 8" SSDD floppies but I don't know how many sectors they use. I picked up a case of sealed boxs of 8" floppy disks today at a hamfest and the case and boxs say that they're for the Micom 2000.
Joe
I recently acquired a California Computer Systems model 2422 Floppy Disk
Controller Rev B. (S-100) in what appears to be good condition but
missing a 2716 EPROM presumably containing the onboard BIOS.
Does anyone have this card and the capability of providing me with a
copy of the PROM or at least a dump of it? I'd also love to get my
hands on the docs, if available.
Thank you,
Erik
**Resent from the proper account**
As I understand it, the drives won't spin up without the panel. I
currently have full
technical documentation for pretty much every DEC hard drive EXCEPT the
RA70.
One of my bosses was a field service engineer for DEC for 15 years, and
the other worked
for 22 years as the senior district representative for New Mexico, West
Texas, Colorado,
Utah, Arizona, and Nevada and was a storage subsystems specialist. They
both agree that
you need the control panel. They also both agree that I'm nuts for
caring.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ethan Dicks
Sent: Sat 2/8/2003 7:21 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: WANTED: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel
--- John Willis <jwillis(a)arielusa.com> wrote:
> Wanted: RA7x Enclosure/Operator Ctrl. Panel
Are these things common/rare? Absolutely required or are they
just
very nice to have? I have a couple of RA70 drives I got in a
box
with some KDA50s. Was going to put them in my BA123 with a
KA630
processor. Haven't had the chance - still using a pair of
RD54s.
So... has anyone tried to put RA7X drives in a CPU (not disk)
enclosure? If I'm hosed, then I guess I'm in the market for
a drive enclosure, too (unless there's some way to hack up an
old AT-style tower case...)
-ethan
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat]
I have been blessed with *two* Teletype ASR-33's. Apart from a minor
cleaning, they are going to be just fine. EXCEPT the rubber platens are as
hard as Chinese arithmetic! In case you havent experienced this, if the
platen gets hard, the printer doesnt print well-- the typehead kinda bounces
off the paper and doesnt leave a clean dark mark.
I've tried the usual remedies-- acetone cleans them up, but they're still
rock hard.
I need some suggestions! Should I try ArmorAll (known to soften rubber,
given time), "Platen cleaner", "belt dressing", "french dressing", or what?
Note that I don't need to clean or make it "grippier", it needs to be
softened, a lot.
Regards,
George
On Feb 7, 23:21, Tony Duell wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 22:33, Tony Duell wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see how you can do a proper test without a visual
inspection
> > of
> > > the connections... And I've yet to see a moulded connector that
> > provides
> > > a proper strain-relief for the cable.
> >
> > A good PAT tester will check at a sensible current (though
admittedly a
> > lot only check earth continuity at a proper current). As for
strain
>
> I've never met a PAT tester that tests the current-carrying
conductors at
> a significant current, mainly because there's no easy way to do this
> without dismantling the unit under test (if the cable is fixed) --
the
> maximum current you could pass would be the normal operating current
of
> the unit (by simply applying mains to it), which is not enough. Even
then
> you couldn't measure the voltage drop across one of the conductors.
A proper PAT tester to current standards has a socket for each end of
an IEC cable, and each cable is supposed to be individually tested with
both ends plugged in to the tester.
> > releif, well you're not supposed to swing the equipment by the
power
> > cable, Tony!
>
> True, but equally I don't expect the outer covering of the cable to
pull
> out of the moulded connector in normal use exposing the
single-insulated
> wires inside. Which has happened to many moulded cables round here.
I've only seen one do that -- and it was an instant candidate for the
wirecutters at both ends. A proper visual inspection is supposed to be
the first part of the PAT.
> I assume you'd fail a rewirable plug with the cord grip missing/not
used
> on an electrical safety test. I certainly would.
Yes. The first thing I do with any multiblock is take it apart to see
how the ends are wired -- the cheap ones are usually in a condition
where I feel compelled to re-do the job.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
My uncle is lettingme re-set up his old tandy 1400 hd. The battery and everythign appears to be working fine. However, MS-Dos is not loading from the harddrive or from disk. Any suggestions on what cold be wrong?
Thank you
debann17
I have two Kaypro II that I have owned from new. Both are upgraded to run
at higher clock speeds and one has a cooling fan fitted. One has the PC8
ROM There is a complete set of the bundled distribution software (Select,
Perfect Writer etc) with manuals, including that really first class ground
breaking program SBasic, and other programs that I wrote in SBasic
including multi variable non linear regression analysis. Also Unidos and
etc which allows the floppy drives to emulate those of other machines.
I used one of these machines to run the first simulation of the CSIRO
Sydney to Melbourne high speed railway.
What price might one expect for such a a machine?.
Alan Emmerson
Brisbane QLD
Australia
Hi,
I have a Grundy Newbrain, which wouldn't start, or if it started it
would only show random chars in the display. I've found out what was
wrong with the machine and if anyone needs help with fixing his (or
hers) machine, I'll be able to point to the problem. As far as I can
tell, this is a common problem with all these machines, and it only gets
worse as time goes by.
Regards,
Torben Ring
Just read some interesting articles of nostalgia on the Warner Qube site on
Yahoo while researching for an article I'm doing over here (England).
I was the first President of Warner Qube system in Pittsburgh which was the
first fully blown QUBE system after the Columbus, and what an experience. I
then went on to Milwaukee and Brooklyn,Queens.
If I can find any of my old info and if you are interested I will dig it out.
( I went on to help develop 2 of the largest U.K. cable/telephone systems for
Comcast as Managing Director of Birmingham England Cable and Comcast Teesside
(England). In each case we supplied cable and telephony service to more
resident than the normal provider (British Telecoms)
Hope this may be of help, if only historically.
Ted Campbell
Yes, the OS allows entering of drive geometry. Actually only supports MFM up
to 70Meg. RLL drives will of course work, just not to RLL capacity. I'm
looking for the largest drives I can find.
From: Ethan Dicks
--- Kelly Leavitt <CCTalk(a)catcorner.org> wrote:
> Any good sources of MFM or RLL drives. This would be for a Tandy 6000
> running Xenix.
>
> I'm looking for 70 Meg or higher MFM (110 RLL capacity).
Hmm... those aren't so common (in the DEC world, there are two
choices - the RD53 (Miniscribe 1325) and the RD54 (Maxtor XT2190).
I take it you aren't constrained by a narrow set of expected
geometries? (i.e. - you have a running system and/or the install
procedure asks you about the drive rather than assuming?)
-ethan
On Feb 5, 5:38, vance(a)neurotica.com wrote:
> I'm about to put some 10Base-FL in and I was wondering if someone
could
> tell me what kind of fiber I should be looking for? Is it 50/125 MMF
like
> GigE? Or is it 62.5/125 MMF like FDDI?
It will work fine with either. In theory, you get slightly higher
coupling losses with 50/125 but can run slightly longer lengths; in
practice it makes little difference. My advice is to stick to one kind
or the other for everything.
York Uni has always used 50/125 for everything (from the original FDDI
and FOIRL through ATM and now 100baseFX and 1000baseSX) -- and we're
smiling now that it's come back into vogue. BTW, stick to ST
connectors where you can. SMAs suck big time, and couplers for STs are
expensive.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York