> YOU need to get a grip - this was sent to the list that also covers off-topic postings, and I also
> put OT in the subject line.
OK. Can I bring up politics and religion, too? As long as I am nice
and say "OT"? I am sure Jay would not mind.
> No need to curse - what kind of upbringing did YOU have? You should be glad *I* am not a list mod.
> You'd be banned already.
> I don't really think anyone wants to read your filth.
I am already headed to the bathroom so I can put a bar of soap in my mouth.
--
Will
>
> From: Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com>
>
> Marden P. Marshall wrote:
> > I'm not trying to be a hard ass here, but please try to look at it from
>
> You may not be trying, but that's the way it's coming off.
I'll go with Marden here. The subject line is like a table of contents, and if I
am looking for something, it is just unacceptable to have the table of contents
have no relationship to the books contents.
For some unknown reason, some posters seem to think it is perfectly okay here to
waste the time of other readers here.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: William Donzelli wdonzelli at gmail.com
>Sent 8/20/2008 9:02:26 PM
>To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft crazy academic deal
>
> PLEASE don't ever pay retail for MICROS~1 products!
>
>So what the f**k are you guys doing giving MICROS~1 so much free
>advertising in the past few hours?
>
>Take it off list.
>
>--
YOU need to get a grip - this was sent to the list that also covers off-topic postings, and I also
put OT in the subject line.
No need to curse - what kind of upbringing did YOU have? You should be glad *I* am not a list mod.
You'd be banned already.
I don't really think anyone wants to read your filth.
Tony
Hi,
I have a couple of these SparcPrinters, that I haven't touched since I
got them. Figured I'd offer them to someone who might want them. Not
sure of the demand for these things, and not sure if they work at the
moment, but there's no reason they shouldn't. I also have the cables
for them. Pickup in the Chicagoland areas or willing to ship if you pay
the actual costs.
Mike
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Smith eric at brouhaha.com
>Sent 8/21/2008 1:36:07 AM
>To: General Discussion GeneralDiscussion@
>Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft crazy academic deal
>
>Eric J Korpela wrote:
> Funny, but OpenOffice is still free.
>
>tonym wrote:
> Funny, but it's still not fully Office 2007 compatible.
>
>Funny, but that's one of OpenOffice's best features. It does the stuff
>I need, without nearly as much useless bloat as MS Office 2007. I deal
>with Word and Excel documents routinely, and although I occasionally run
>into one that uses an exotic feature not in OpenOffice, it's never been
>anything that prevented me from doing what I need with the document.
>
Funniest, is that "feature" makes it unusable at, oh, 9 out of 10 universities in this country, and countless
numbers of businesses. I know I couldn't use it at work - it wouldn't open hardly anything.
I'd me MORE than happy to install OpenOffice on my wife's laptop...
But what is she to do when the send her stuff in Office 2007 format, which OO can't open?
Don't get me wrong - I'm not pro Microsoft, or anything. This is just a tool that my wife needs in school,
and it was cheap. Obviously, by installing OO 2.4.1 and trying to open some of her docs from her last
semester, OO isn't going to cut it. It opened 3 out of 17,and the rest, it wanted me to go through a HUGE list of formats to choose one,of which most Office 2007 stuff was missing. Office jsut knows what it is.
Couldn't even open the PowerPoint presentations at all.
Tony
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric J Korpela korpela at ssl.berkeley.edu
>Sent 8/20/2008 11:16:06 PM
>To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft crazy academic deal
>
>Funny, but OpenOffice is still free.
>
>Eric
>
>
Funny, but it's still not fully Office 2007 compatible.
Had trouble with Word 2007 templates and certain docs, and can't open PowerPoint 2007 presentations.
I JUST tried 2.4.1 from openoffice.org with some of my wife's school .doc's and PPoint presentations.
Guess THAT didn't work out like you planned.
Has anyone here dealt with the fans on a VAXstation 4000/vlc? I use
one as a DECnet router, and its fans are "howling" loud enough that
it is not "dining room friendly" (believe it or not I'm the one that
says it's to loud to run and not my wife). I'd prefer to keep the
/vlc running rather than replace it with either a /60 or /90.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:14 PM, tonym <tonym at compusource.net> wrote:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: William Donzelli wdonzelli at gmail.com
>>Sent 8/20/2008 9:02:26 PM
>>To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts cctalk at classiccmp.org
>>Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft crazy academic deal
>>
>> PLEASE don't ever pay retail for MICROS~1 products!
>>
>>So what the f**k are you guys doing giving MICROS~1 so much free
>>advertising in the past few hours?
>>
>>Take it off list.
>>
>>--
>
>
> YOU need to get a grip - this was sent to the list that also covers off-topic postings, and I also
> put OT in the subject line.
>
> No need to curse - what kind of upbringing did YOU have? You should be glad *I* am not a list mod.
> You'd be banned already.
> I don't really think anyone wants to read your filth.
>
>
>
> Tony
Not to be a jerk about it, but welcome to the Internet. People swear,
just like they do in real life. If your mom doesn't want you to hear
those words, set up an email filter or something. Hell, he even
censored himself, but you still felt the need to complain?
I do agree that this topic is just fine on the list; it's not like we
have these sort of threads every day, and some people could find this
information (about the Academic Alliance and other things) useful.
John "Potty Mouth" Floren
--
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Fred Cisin cisin at xenosoft.com
>Sent 8/20/2008 8:05:58 PM
>To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft crazy academic deal
>
>
>Microsoft "academic pricing" is always in that range.
>It is not always the same for different schools.
>Where I teach, MICROS~1 wants $45 for Office or Vista, and $55 for visual
>studio.
>
>all year long.
>
>http://old.foundationccc.org/msca/default.aspx
>
That site only covers 6 states. I live in Florida, which is NOT on the list at that site.
This is a full retail Office 2007 Ultimate, 2-computer license (1 desktop, 1 laptop), for $59.95.
As for Vista, that site has Vista Business, not Ultimate. Business lacks all the Multimedia/Media Center portions of Vista.
Tony
I've got a large lot of various MFM harddrives sitting around that I have no
use for. Don't know much about these but have to be worth something. If
interested let me know and maybe we can work out either a cash or trade
deal.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca
>Sent 8/20/2008 9:09:40 PM
>To: General Discussion GeneralDiscussion@
>Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft crazy academic deal
>
>Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 20 Aug 2008 at 17:49, Fred Cisin wrote:
>
>
> PLEASE don't ever pay retail for MICROS~1 products!
>
>
> So, who has the best price for "Bob"?
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>The pirate as allways!
>
>
I remember seeing that garbage at Incredible Universe YEARS ago when they were still in business!
Back then they were pushing that garbage as "Microsoft Home" and all the games, as well.
Tony
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Fred Cisin cisin at xenosoft.com
>Sent 8/20/2008 8:49:33 PM
>To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts cctalk at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft crazy academic deal
>
>On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, tonym wrote:
> That site only covers 6 states. I live in Florida, which is NOT on the list at that site.
> This is a full retail Office 2007 Ultimate, 2-computer license (1 desktop, 1 laptop), for $59.95.
> As for Vista, that site has Vista Business, not Ultimate. Business lacks all the Multimedia/Media Center portions of Vista.
>
>Yes, there are a lot of different deals and places to do it through.
>A better starting point than the one I use and posted, is:
>
>http://www.microsoft.com/education/eligible.mspx
>http://www.microsoft.com/Education/USAcademicPricing.mspx
>
>Shop around for varying deals, but do NOT fall for "you gotta buy by
>midnight".
>
>
>If your school has subscribed to the MSDN Academic Alliance, then you
>can copy certain products for free, if you promise to erase them when you
>graduate.
>
I think you need to review the terms of the agreement at that first link you sent, for Microsoft Campus.
Those renew yearly, and can only be installed *ONCE*. According to that site you sent, FAQ #4, they even
advise you to run AntiVirus to protect your computer, as you are not even entitled to REinstall it.
Apples-and-oranges - I can install and re-install this on those 2 computers as often as I wish, and no yearly license fee.
Tony
At 03:11 PM 8/18/2008, joe lobocki wrote:
>someone really should open a vintage computer museum near
>chicago...Ive toyed with the idea, i think space in the old 3com
>building in rolling meadows would be a fitting place for vintage
>computing....
I'd love to hear from anyone actually operating a computer museum.
They seem like money sinks. You need benefactor$. Obviously, the
best location for a computer museum would be where rich computer
people like to live.
I'd love to hear the typical ratio between exhibit space and storage/repair
space, for example.
- John
Does anyone know of a source for schematics of the Atanasoff-Berry Computer vacuum tube logic circuitry? I've found this web page:
http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/ABC/
but there are no schematics available there. I have emailed the person at the bottom of the web page, but I suspect that since school is not in session, I won't soon get a response.
http://xkcd.com/243/
>Message: 20
>Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:24:06 -0400
>From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
>Subject: Re: PC keyboards
>On Aug 20, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Alexandre Souza wrote:
>>>> I use an IBM model M with a PS2-to-USB converter :o)
>>> I use a Unicomp Customizer. It's black/silver and has native
>>> USB. It also uses the famous IBM/Lexmark buckling-spring mechanism.
>>
>> BTW an old dream of mine is finding an IBM "M" keyboard with the
>> trackpoint (know as "clitoris" in Brazil...go figure! :oD).
> We call them that here too. :)
> -Dave
Just curious if the person who owns this eBay store is a list regular?
And, more the the point, do they actually get anyone to pay nearly $500
for an AT&T PC7300?
--
>>First Northern Germany DECnet Party, who wants to join?
>>
>>Who wants to install, configure, network,
>>cluster or program ALPHAs, MIPSen, VAXen and
>>PDPs just for fun together with 10 to 20 other
>>DEC enthusiasts for a day or two?
>Are you going to link into HECnet as part of the event?
No, not this time, but maybe next time.
There's no internet access in our meeting room and furthermore I'd have to connect to HECnet first at all.
But thank you very much for the idea.
We will discuss it among the participants of the DECnet Party.
I see it would be a great chance for Enthusiasts from overseas to join us.
Regards,
Ulli
The VAXorcist
As someone who runs a museum - The Personal Computer Museum
(www.pcmuseum.ca) in Brantford, Ontario, Canada I can tell you that it's a
lot more work than you might think to get it going, keep it running, etc.
As stated, there are many issues beyond just getting the place going. It
depends on local laws as well. I'm currently a not-for-profit organization
with "charitable objects". My "Charitable status" is still in the works and
takes months. Getting it means a lot for those who donate computers and
money, and in some cases for certain grants it is an absolute requirement.
There are also "museum standards" that must be adhered to. Policies on how
you manage the collection and everything else about it.
We are JUST starting to get international attention and are growing - but
I've been at it for almost 3 years of being open and I've been collecting
for over 20. I am hoping to be at it full time by next year--but it's a
SLOW process.
If you wish to talk to me about it privately, email me at sbolton at
bfree.on.ca and I'd be more than happy to share my experiences.
Greetings.
I am interested in purchasing a HERO1 (fro heathkit).
The original asking price from 1979 - 1982 was about $1,500.00
I think $150.00 would be a fair trade. What do you think?
Referenced here: http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2007-December/089541.html
Thank you.
Atomkey.
At 07:35 AM 8/20/2008, William Donzelli wrote:
>And the answer is the American Museum of Electricity, in Niskayuna,
>NY, near Albany. In the early 1960s, some of the people involved
>apparently were very much forward thinkers, and planned to have an
>entire wing of their building dedicated to computers. Other wings
>dealt with other branches of electricity and electronics.
Here's a few ambitious pictures.
http://www.ginosrailpage.com/TandS/AME.html
- John
Yes, you can do better on shipping.
I am assuming that you're dropping the freight off at Craters &
Freighters.
With that in mind:
Call Craters back, and have them quote you JUST on the packaging.
Have them do the packing. . . they do good work.
Pick the unit back up from them (They will more than likely
put it into a large box, banded to a skid.)
Take the unit to Forward Air in Des Plaines,
and have them send it to Austin, hold for pickup.
(They can also deliver it in Austin, but that of course is extra.)
You can obtain a rate quote from them by calling their 800 number.
See their website at: http://www.ForwardAir.com
Forward Air will not accept unboxed or improperly packaged items.
Based on the dimensions you provided, 48" x 30" x 42",
I would GUESS that, packaged, you're looking at about
54" x 36" x 48" or so. . . That will give you a CHARGEABLE
weight of about 375 lbs. . . Forward Air would charge about
$207 total, to move it from Chicago to Austin.
(Again, that is only from their dock, to their dock in Austin.)
Although ForwardAir has relatively few problems with
larger, properly packaged items, I would still insure it.
As info. . . .
T
Just a quick introduction - besides being the guy who can't make his IBM
6904-20 Lighted Programmable Function Keyboard work on a serial port and
writing a TCP/IP stack from scratch that runs on a PCjr, I am also a
moderator at The Vintage Computer Forums web forum (
http://www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum/ ) . Some of you are regulars
there too, but it is more PC and smaller computer oriented than most of
you on this list are.
We have many of the same problems with well known auction sites that
many subscribers here have. We also have enough traffic in our 'for
sale' section of the forum to finally warrant a more structured auction
type service. So we are happy to announce "The Vintage Computer and
Gaming Marketplace" at http://marketplace.vintage-computer.com/ .
The idea is give vintage computer collectors an alternative to your
favorite big site that is more targeted to our specific interests. It
is simple to use, it supports auctions and normal fixed price sales, and
there is none of this sniping bogusness that happens on eBay. Best of
all, it's completely free to use - no listing fees.
Thanks for reading,
Mike
PCjr nutcase and soon to be TRS-80 Model 4 nutcase
One of my machines is an old Packard-Bell Legend 610 machine, to which I am
trying to fit a second hard drive.
The machine will not recognize any modern (or semi-modern) hard drive I have
attempted to fit. I have tried various master/slave combinations, to no avail.
My guess is that this is due to the BIOS being of am early type. The BIOS
chip is a socketed DIP package and the lettering on it is too faded to read.
The screen boot-up display is this:
PhoenixBIOS(TM) A486 Version 1.01
PB400 OPTI 486WB
Reference ID 08
Is this a reasonable guess?
If so, what might be done by way of a BIOS upgrade?
Thanks,
Kurt
I obtained the Wang 1200 word processor that was mentioned few weeks
>from list member Bradley Slavik (thanks!). it is sitting in my sister's
garage in Berwyn IL (just west of Chicago). I need to ship it to
Austin, tx.
My hand wave on the item, not having seen it, but having a picture of
one in a brochure. 4" wide, 2.5" deep, 3.5" high, 100 lbs or so. It
turns out 100 lbs is a price boundary, but up to 200 lbs is only about
$50 more.
Based on my hand wave of dimensions and weight, craters & freighters
quoted $500 to pick it up in berwyn (60402), crate it, and ship it to
austin (78737). Certainly you couldn't pay me $500 to do it myself, so
on that basis they are the best option I have so far.
I know various people on this list have had better or worse experience
with shippers, and I don't mean to get into that discussion again. I
was just wondering if this quote is reasonable.
Thanks
>Message: 22
>Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:40:17 -0400
>From: "William Donzelli" <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Opening computer museums
<snip>
>> Yeah, but part of the grant always goes to administrative overhead.
>Splat!
>"Administrative overhead" is a big red flag for the organizations that
>are issuing the grants.
<snip>
>> At any rate, the grant is going to be issued as the parent
>> organization and not directly to you; that's the whole point of
>> working under an umbrella organization. But yes, you're correct that
>> grants are legal documents with restrictions that have to be observed.
>It is wiser to keep any kick backs to the parent organization
>completely outside any grants, and wise to keep them above the table.
>--
>Will
Having worked at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, and written a number of grant proposals, I can say that whether or not you include overhead depends both on to whom you are applying (do they allow overhead?) and the institution through which you are applying. Some institutions will let you get by without writing overhead into your grant, while others will insist on overhead greater than what you are asking for in the first place. Overhead rates are usually negotiated in advance between the institution and the granting agency, and the rates vary depending on the use of the money -? salary usually gets a higher overhead rate. At the FMNH, you couldn?t even _talk_ to funding sources without first clearing it with the grants office. The main reason for that was that, by asking the funding source about funding your project, you might jeopardize the funding of other projects that were already in the works or planned.
Bob
>>> without an endowment or a building you are forever treading water untill you find help.
Exactly. The toughest place to start is at square one. So I urge people to emulate what we did here in NJ -- start by partnering with an existing organization. A science museum is the best place. Colleges, libraries, community centers, etc. are next. IMHO, the least desirable kind of partner is a private company.
The same overpriced goods and always without a picture. It appears
that this seller has just recently gotten a new identity. You may
want to adjust your searches to exclude the new identity as I have.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
Does anyone have a DEC PC04 paper tape reader/punch that they would be
interested in letting go? I'm also looking for the matching PC8-E
(M840) UNIBUS controller card.
Thanks,
-Mardy
Richard wrote:
> In article <5107C05E-01F2-4A99-AEBB-4475E5C10E8B at comcast.net>,
> CRC <technobug at comcast.net> writes:
>
>> I was at my local scrapper recently and ran across a number of
>> manuals
>> for the IBM Grelystone Display Station in the dumpster:
>>
>> Maintenance Analysis Procedures
>> Greystone Parts Catalog
>> Maintenance Information Manual
>
> What is a "Greystone Display Station"? Googling didn't turn up
> anything obvious.
Jason T helpfully added:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
> wrote:
>
>> What is a "Greystone Display Station"? Googling didn't turn up
>> anything obvious.
>
> Ah, sometimes you have to look to the non-obvious:
>
> http://www.pmsimon.com/images/productplacement.jpg
So that everyone is not left with the wrong impression I scanned a
couple of pages from the manuals and they can be found at
<elipsoid.home.comcast.net/Greystone.html>.
The manuals appear to be drafts for a CRT display station. Again, if
interested, they are available for postage.
CRC
-- g-wright at att.net wrote:
> I think all of the Power Stack computers by Motorola where
>Power PC systems. I have 2 AViiON's here which where 88k. (Of >coarse quit large)
SO, which AViiON models do you have? I have a 400 and a 412, with
enough parts to build a 530.
The 'PowerStack' systems I was thinking of looks like this:
http://www.corestore.org/powerstack.jpg
It looks kinda like a series 900, but not quite exact. Never seen
one IRL.
____________________________________________________________
Free quote and debt consolidation information. Click Here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m2Xh79qfbH31rKOFSMlAirCs…
A local business contacted me to ask if I had a parallel port card
(centronics) for an Apple //e. They apparently got "hit" and lost the
existing card. Seems they still have an old application they need to
keep running for a few more months while they convert to something
newer.
I'm not an Apple guy, but promised I'd ask around. So, list, anyone
have such a card they'd be willing to part with? Presumably they'd be
willing to pay something for it.
Mid Michigan, though such a card can presumably be mailed without too
much pain from nearly anywhere.
Thanks,
De
This is not my system, contact stan below for details:
======================================================
I have an old HP 64000 development system that I would like to sell to the appropriate person or collector of vintage computer equipment. I just don't know where to look. I am on the east coast on Long Island.
stans829 at optonline.net
Snagged a bunch of these in original packaging from a box in the
engineering department.
http://csplan9.rit.edu/users/john/archerkbd.jpghttp://csplan9.rit.edu/users/john/archerkbd-tag.jpg
Very nice key placement for a UNIX keyboard, assuming you can live
without an ALT key (although I guess that is a potential function for
the FUNCT key). Maybe I should get a microcontroller and try making a
terminal :)
John
--
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Does anyone happen to know which font(s) best replicate the DEC logo, such
as this: http://www.vaxination.ca/vms/alpha/digital_556.jpg ...? I thought
Arial Narrow might be correct, but things like the bottom of the lowercase
"a" are different.
We're looking to make a DEC banner for an exhibit in our museum here in New
Jersey. (Or, does anyone have an existing DEC banner to loan / donate
inexpensively sell to us?)
- Evan
Can anyone identify the power control connectors used on the H7874 power
supplies in the DEC BA4xx boxes? They look a lot like RJ-45s, but there are
some extra ridges in them so that an RJ style plug won't fit. And the
contact arrangement is different, so it probably wouldn't work even if it
did fit.
I'm trying find a cable so I can daisy chain the power control on a couple
of cabinets, or matching connectors so that I can make my own.
Thanks,
Bob Armstrong
A local auctionsite yielded me a dead hp85 for 1$.
The error was quickly identified : the internal flatcables were badly aligned and shorted out several lines.
The machine is now functional, but still suffers from bad contacts. I might resolve to soldering some wires instead of the offending flatcables.
Of course tapedrive and printer need to be rebuild : any source for small quantities of these belts in Europe ?
Jos Dreesen
> Just wondering if anyone's found a decent tool for pushing wire-wrap
> socket pins out of (thick) 1/8" prototyping board.
I made something a LONG time ago by drilling a hole into the end of a center punch.
-- Jim Battle <frustum at pacbell.net> wrote:
Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Steven Hirsch wrote:
>> Just curious if the person who owns this eBay store is a list regular?
>> And, more the the point, do they actually get anyone to pay nearly
>> $500 for an AT&T PC7300?
>
> I sold one for $300 last summer. Remember, this whole notion of
> classic computers never being worth any actual money is pretty much
> restricted to this mailing list.
Yeah, and I guess the whole notion of the classic computers hobby
being a level playing field was also restricted to this list.
Ooops, I guess not even that is true anymore, huh?
____________________________________________________________
Click for online loan, fast & no lender fee, approval today
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m3WL623vT1MXViOvoiNjovS5…
All,
A couple of things I have but don't have time to fool with:
User's Reference Manual only :-( for Tenon Mach-Ten Unix for Macintosh.
also the box for the media, but *no media*.
A/UX Essentials Manual only for Apple A/UX
X/11 Reference for A/UX
X/11 User's Guide for A/UX
Apple MacX (User's Guide Supplement for A/UX (2 copies)
X-11 for A/UX and MacX install disks (3.5" floppies)
I'd like to get shipping + 25% or so; I'm in Zip 78254.
Also still looking to divest myself of many many reels of 9-track tape.
Suggestions welcome as to a better venue for this kind of
announcement, but I'm not a big fan of eBay. Contact by email
preferred, cellphone below is also OK.
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
-- Steven M Jones <classiccmp at crash.com> wrote:
jeff.kaneko at juno.com wrote:
>> You'd probably have better luck locating an 88k AViiON.
>> Many more were produced, with similar (VME) architecture.
>> Documentation is scarce, but if you get the right model,
>> there's some good info available.
>
>Appreciate the suggestion. I already have a few deskside
>88k AViiONs buried in storage,
Cool! Which model(s)?
> several Moto MVME 88100/88110 modules and a chassis
>or two,
Yep, standard issue . . .
>an ADP-badged M8120,
The Shoebox! Looks like OpenBSD kinda-sorta works on this
one . . .
>and one of the OMRON Luna 88k SMP workstations. That last just
>popped up on eBay one day so I grabbed it
You lucky dog! These are the rarest of the 88k systems (unless
you also consider the nearly-mythical 88k NextStation). ISTR a
LUNA appeared or E-bay a couple of years ago. Was yours that
one? The price was quite high IIRC. . .
>-- say, wonder if I can dig that out in time for VCF...
Maybe there should be an 88k contingent this go around?
Maybe I can bring my 412. . . .
Jeff
____________________________________________________________
Live your dreams. Click here to find information on becoming a lawyer.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3oFGmeTdIHkCRO7tYZ1uPzwsM…
I know this is a 'blast from the past', but did anyone ever find the
McIlroy paper? The McIlroy algorithm both inspired and was in direct
competition with the NRL algorithm. The NRL algorithm was developed by
Votrax and the Naval Research Laboratory, details of which are discussed
in another paper (NTIS ADA0121 929, NRL report 7948) which is available
>from the national archives in college park, MD. (I'm planning to get a
copy of the latter, but have no idea how to get a copy of the M. D.
McIlroy paper. the version in the journal of the acoustical society of
america is not the complete paper, but a citation of it for a
conference, afaict)
*
*
--
Jonathan Gevaryahu
jgevaryahu(@t)hotmail(d0t)com
jzg22(@t)drexel(d0t)edu
*
Don Y* dgy at DakotaCom.Net
<mailto:cctech%40classiccmp.org?Subject=OT-ish%3F%20%20McIlroy%27s%20%22Synthetic%20English%20Speech%20by%20Rule%22&In-Reply-To=>
/Wed Jul 19 21:37:44 CDT 2006
/
My only claim to being *possibly* on-topic is the age
of the article (1974) and the fact that it inspired
many of the early phoneme-driven speech synthesizers
(Votrax, etc.).
Does anyone have access to a suitably good engineering
library with a copy of:
McIlroy, M D, "Synthetic English Speech by Rule",
Bell Telephone Labs, CSTR #14, 1973 (though I have
also seen it referenced as 1974!)
or:
Ainsworth, W A, "A System for Converting English Text
to Speech", IEEE Trans Audio & Electroacoustics AU-21 #3
pp 288-290, 1973
The former is far more interesting to me than the
latter :-(
(sigh) There are *some* advantages to being a student
(though those days are long past, in my case!)
I can try my local public library to see if it is
available via ILL. I guess I could also try the local
university's engineering library.
Thanks!
--don
I am starting to put stuff up for sale on the Vintage Computer and Gaming
Marketplace:
http://marketplace.vintage-computer.com/index.php?
Included are an Aim-65 and a Pro-Log 900 Prom Programmer. More stuff will be
added as time permits.
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:49:22 -0700
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Upgrading early BIOS
On 13 Aug 2008 at 15:36, M H Stein wrote:
>> AFAIK cable select has always been an option with Parallel ATA drives,
>> although it was rarely used in pre-UDMA days; the cable was obviously
>> different (40 conductors with standard connectors vs. 80 conductors and
>> unique special connectors) and the order of the drives was usually reversed
>> (i.e. the slave on the end of the cable).
>Nope--I've got a couple of very early Conner and Maxtor drives (less
>than 100 MB)--CS isn't an option on the jumpers.
If you'd read more carefully, you'd have seen that I *did* say that "not all drives
supported the CS option;" in fact, quite a few of the older drives did not.
I was responding to the posted statement that CS "had not been invented" in
the 486 days, when AFAIK, it was part of the early ATA specs (although
rarely implemented in practice).
> It's the motherboard that determines the cable type and mode from pin 34,
> which is grounded at the mobo end in a UDMA cable, so if the mobo isn't
> UDMA-aware I don't think the drives would be, and the cable wouldn't matter.
> Also, not all drives supported CS.
>Read the Wiki article you cited:
>"Pin 34:
>Pin 34 is connected to ground inside the blue connector of an 80
>conductor cable but not attached to any conductor of the cable. It is
>attached normally on the gray and black connectors".
>On UDMA-66 capable drives, it's the cable, not the mobo that dictates
>speed. Put an ordinary 40 conductor cable on a UDMA-capable drive
>and mobo, and the configuration won't take advantage of it. When the
>changeover was in progress, we used to get support calls quite often
>on the subject of UDMA cables and drives on non-UDMA mobos.
Well, I never knew that just replacing the cable in my 386 and 486 systems
would speed things up; live and learn. I always thought that if the mobo
wasn't pin 34 aware and UDMA capable then the cable wouldn't have much
effect on the transfer mode. AFAIK in order to use UDMA all three items
have to be UDMA capable, the mobo, the cable and the drives, although
I'd say that, assuming it's UDMA aware, the mobo controls the speed
depending on what kind of cable and drives it sees. Semantics?
You said that with a UDMA cable, any UDMA capable drive will operate in
UDMA mode (presumably regardless of the mobo); how does a drive know
what kind of cable is connected? I always assumed that only the mobo can
tell from pin 34.
BTW, a UDMA cable certainly works with non-UDMA drives and/or mobos,
although you have to remember that it is also a CS cable, but I don't think
it'll be any faster.
>Similarly:
>"With the 40-wire cable it was very common to implement cable select
>by simply cutting the pin 28 wire between the two device connectors;
>putting the slave device at the end of the cable, and the master on
>the "middle" connector. This arrangement eventually was standardized
>in later versions. If there is just one device on the cable, this
>results in an unused "stub" of cable, which is undesirable for
>physical convenience and electrical reasons. The stub causes signal
>reflections, particularly at higher transfer rates."
>Bottom line is that if you use a non-CS-capable (i.e. 40 conductor
>"straight through") cable, it won't work. Depending on what the
>mobo/controller end does with pin 28, you'll have either two masters
>or two slaves on the same cable.
Agreed; I took it for granted, but with our detour into UDMA the most
important point to be made relevant to the OP is that Cable Select needs
a special cable and with pre-UDMA drives & mobos you're probably
better off using Master/Slave and a standard cable.
>Cheers,
>Chuck
m
Somewhere, I have a kit that someone made for connecting a Speak & Spell
to a computer to act as a voice synthesizer. I can't remember if it was
for the TRS-80 or S-100 bus systems.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
I've successfully connected a 20MB Bernoulli Box to a PC using drivers
found off the web.
The configuration is an active part of my main data conversion system, so
I'd be happy to pass along the configuration to anyone who e-mails me
directly.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:00:04 -0700
From: "Scanning" <steven.alan.canning at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Speak and Swear
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <001101c90036$e0942910$0301a8c0 at hal9000>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Little known ( I think... ) Speak & Spell trivia fact; The very first
original S & Ss ( circa 1978 ?? ) with the hard molded buttons had swear
words that the programmers had sneaked into the voice code ROMs. On mine you
could access these by selecting the module ( with no ROM module plugged in )
and select level D. It would then say " Spell .... a bunch of garbage words,
and then swear words" at the end . I have a .wav and an MP3 example of this
little S & S Easter Egg... TI found out ( of course ) and recalled as many
units as they could. If you can find one now they are quite rare and very
entertaining. A special ed teacher I know used S & Ss to help her kids and
was wondering why they kept laughing uncontrollably. They had figured out
how to access the "special" words ....
Best regards, Steven
I have a 1978 (raised button) speak & spell here, and I tried what you
said. While it does glitch out randomly (the speech rom is apparently
accessing open bus instead of the module, and is saying gibberish which
occasionally points to the valid internal rom), I'm not hearing anything
that could be considered swear words. yet.
Also, afaik the US speak&spell only had two rom revisions:
CD2300/TMC0351 plus CD2301/TMC0352 in the 1978 one with the raised
buttons (32KiB of total rom, 16KiB per chip)
and CD2350 in the 1980 one with the membrane/flat keypad (16KiB total
rom, probably a cost-cutting measure, only has half as many words I think)
Which version was supposedly recalled? the earlier one?
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lord_Nightmare (scroll down) to
see all the CDxxxx chips I know of, and which ones have had their
contents read out. (if you have any I'm missing, such as the UK
speak&spell 78, or the italian grillo parlante, or the german 'buddy',
email me off list)
--
Jonathan Gevaryahu
jgevaryahu(@t)hotmail(d0t)com
jzg22(@t)drexel(d0t)edu
With a heavy heart and ever-diminishing storage space, I'm going to part
with my HP64000 development system. This is a soup-to-nuts setup including:
- HP64000 desktop unit (all-in-one w/ keyboard and floppy drives)
- External HPIB hard disk (from an HP9000, i.e. physically small)
- CPU Pods for 68000, 68010, Z80, 8085, 8088 and 8051. I do not have the
interface boards for everything and have never used them. Some look to
be brand new.
- More interface and emulation boards (for internal card frame) than I
know what to do with. Spares for just about everything.
- Several EPROM programmer adapters (mount in main system unit).
- Tape drive mechanism (internal mount, was replaced by diskette drives)
- Two 4ft. shelves full of manuals - hardware and software
- Complete cross-assembler and cross-compiler software for every 1978-1982
CPU you have ever heard of and perhaps some you haven't. Probably 2-3
linear feet of 5-1/4" diskettes, most the original distribution media.
The last time I fired it up, the main unit worked fine. It boots from the
attached HPIB drive and was able to access the floppy drives without
error.
I won't even consider shipping it, you will need to pick it up in
Burlington, VT and must take everything with you.
Note that I haven't mentioned price. That's because there isn't any.
Terms are simple: Free to the first person who makes arrangements with me
for pickup and appears at my door.
Steve
--
Anyone know what an IBM 4702 is? I found one in the trash at my local
dump. It's a cube shaped box with a couple of 5.25" floppy drives on
the front. Would this be of interest to anyone? If so, I'll pick it up
(free) but you'll have to come by and get it at my home in Bedford, NH.
I have 3 Digital Select Info Sys 5 1/4 floppies and two working copies.
In a package can be shipped Media Mail
"Select /V2.30 Master Bin RX18"
"Select /V2.30 Install/Tch Bin RX18"
"Select /V2.30 Superspl Bin RX18"
Make Me an Offer
Bob in Wisconsin
Hi guys,
My LPFK reverse engineering attempts have drawn a blank -- does anyone
happen to have a copy of the PC drivers for this thing? IBM part numbers were
39F8224 and 39F8225, for 3.5" and 5.25" format respectively.
These discs contained diagnostic software and drivers used to connect the
LPFK to a PS/2, PC-XT or PC-AT.
Rumour has it there was also a connection pack, #4025, which consisted of
the diagnostic disc, serial cable and power supply.
There's also a document referenced in the RS/6000 Graphics Handbook -- "IBM
6094-020 LPFK Options Instructions, GA23-2403". Does anyone have a copy of
this, and is there any useful information in it?
At this point, I don't think there's anything else I can really do without
either some software that can talk to the LPFK (and maybe a disassembler...),
or some actual protocol documentation.
Thanks,
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/
Back in the early 80's, I remember that something I wanted very badly
was a product someone was selling that you could mod a Speak and Spell
with, and use it as a voice synthesiser for a computer.
I know it was out for the TRS-80. But, I don't remember if it worked on
other platforms. It must, I would think.
Anyone else remember this?
Al
Phila, PA
More junk coming to light in the barn.
Another lot of data books from the 80's and early 90's. See
picture. $6 plus actual (Media Mail) shipping from 65775.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2cqcz7s&s=4
The Franklin Ace 1000 (Apple II clone, but you probably already
know that if you're interested :) has a "Microtek" parallel
printer card and a single floppy drive, but no disk drive card or
monitor so I can't test it. The power supply voltages are all
good, it's clean inside, and the "ON" and keyboard "LOCK" LEDs are
lit, but that's all I can tell. I did take the missing parts from
my IIe over 20 years ago and booted it up (there's a DOS disk copy
I made in the drive), but no guarantees after sitting in storage
for that length of time! Manual included. No reasonable offer
refused. (You pay shipping or can pick up in St. Louis).
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4ruw7p&s=4http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2uducsn&s=4
Also a Seagate ST-277R drive (a whopping 65 MB), complete
ST21R/22R controller card with instructions and cables. Again,
this worked a very long time ago with a 386SX-40 system, IIRC.
Probably has Win 3.1 on it, but I don't remember. Make an offer,
it's just taking up space here and I hate to throw it out!
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2ypdn45&s=4
Please email me off-list if interested.
thanks
Charles
A belated thanks to all who responded with their ideas about whether or
not it is safe to power up these old machines. Since I just don't have
the time to do it properly and make sure the machine is preserved as
well as it could be, I'll entertain offers on it. I have a few
photographs I can forward to anyone interested. If I don't get a
reasonable offer (I'm selling for a friend) I'll just list it on the
infernal ebay. I'd rather do something with someone here. I can ship
(it's in the 2 original boxes) or pickup can be made here (Topsfield,
MA). Please contact me offlist.
Best,
John Kuenzig
(and nope, no Corvus interface or drive, sorry!)
Hi all -
I received this message from one of our customers. Nancy has original
manuals for the IBM Displaywriter (see her message below). If you are
interested please contact Nancy directly at NKParadise at aol.com. If you
do succeed in obtaining them, please let the list know its gone so she
isn't bombarded.
Best,
John Kuenzig
Bookseller
That would be wonderful, John. Please do forward the info. Thanx, Nancy
===
Nancy -
If you're ok with it, I'll forward your message to a classic computer
list I belong to, and it is likely that someone there might need them.
They would contact you directly in that case.
Best,
John
NKParadise at aol.com wrote:
>
> *I have a complete/original set of manuals (10-12 of them) for the IBM
> Displaywriter sold in the early 1980's -- before the Personal
> Computer. I also have all the program disks (Textpack IV and
> Reportpack) and some 8" floppies. Everything is in excellent
> condition. Do you have a need for any of this? ... or an idea of
> anyone who may?*
>
> *Nancy Paradise*
> *561-744-8133*
> *561-746-4848 X307*
> *NKParadise at aol.com* <mailto:NKParadise at aol.com>
Hi all -
We've been accumulating various manufacturer catalogues for components,
etc as we've bought large lots of engineering books out of houses. I've
compiled a list of about 50 various items (DEC, TI, Sams, GE, RCA,
Allied Radio, etc etc) with prices, etc. - if interested please send me
a note offlist. Most are nominal (under $20, many less). Just want to
move them to a good home and clear up some space without taking the time
to list them online.
Along those same lines, we were able to purchase some DEC manuals (about
10 boxes worth), most original DEC stuff, most of it Ultrix and VAX/VMS
stuff, which I can also send to interested parties offlist.
Best,
John Kuenzig
Bookseller
jfk at kuenzigbooks.com
Topsfield MA
You'd probably have better luck locating an 88k AViiON.
Many more were produced, with similar (VME) architecture.
Documentation is scarce, but if you get the right model,
there's some good info available.
-- Steven M Jones <classiccmp at crash.com> wrote:
Just to pile-on, a reminder that I'm interested in providing a home for
an 88k-based Powerstack. With or without manuals. ;^)
Thanks,
--Steve.
Berkeley, CA, USA
____________________________________________________________
Click here for great computer networking solutions!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3oHgMTIypdPVr76Uh5kJh7zjG…
Hi at all,
i write to evidence my website about the computer board in object.
The evidence is ONLY for to have more contacts and to exchange info to
rebuild all possible especially around the italian version of the board.
http://elazzerini.interfree.it/index.htm
Regards
Enrico Lazzerini - Pisa (Italy)
Does anyone know of a source for a [relatively] cheap paper tape
reader suitable for reading standard DEC paper tapes? I have several
paper tapes from a PDP-11/20 that I would like to read, and of course,
share :-). Something like the OP-80 from Oliver Engineering would be
suitable.
Thanks.
--barrym
I picked up a very old Iomega Bernoulli Box (labeled on the rear as "The
Bernoulli Box," on the front as "Iomega Cartridge Disk Subsystem"),
model CDS-PC/20. The chassis basically looks like a knockoff of the
original IBM PC, even down to the red on/off switch on the rear right.
Got a few 10mb cartridges with it, but no controller.
Anyone have a PC controller for this thing they don't need? Any advice
for cleaning it out before I try to load any cartridges?
Thanks,
Josh
I've got a Dauphin DTR-1 PDA type device. It includes all original stuff
(as far as I can tell). Original boxes all in excellent shape. It even has
the original display box the other 3 boxes sit in. Even has install
floppies for windows 3.x and Dos. Must go soon, email if interested.
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:28:19 -0500
From: Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org>
Subject: Re: Where to find memory ICs?
To: General at mail.mobygames.com,
"Discussion at mail.mobygames.com":On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <489B7703.7050009 at oldskool.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Glen Slick wrote:
>> I just want a few tubes of these to populate the board, I'm not looking
>> for a box of 'em :-) Any pointers?
>
> www.unicornelectronics.com
> 511000-100 $1.89 quanity 25-99
I want to use these to populate an Above Board from 2MB to 8MB, and that
would require 6*9*1.89 = $102.06 for just 6MB of RAM.
Does anyone know of a cheaper way to get DRAM? $100 just so I can add
6MB of RAM to a card doesn't seem right...
I came to this discussion late, so apologies if I missed the point.
However, in answer to your last question, I have found desoldering
memory chips from old SIMMs to be a workable method.
I wanted a bunch of 16M X 4 FPM DRAM and the cheapest way to get it
was off of 128 MB 72 pin SIMMs which were selling for about $10 each
when carefully shopped for on Ebay. Each SIMM holds 16 chips so the
price was well under $1 per chip. Plus there were a handful on 16M
X 1 chips on boards as well for parity.
Anyway, your target memory chips might be cheaply available on old 30
pin or 72 pin SIMMs. The biggest obstacle would be a requirement for
DIPs. Most SIMMs have SOJ chips on board, rather than DIPs.
Jeff Walther
In this discussion I kept waiting for someone to talk about the "Micro
Firmware ATA Pro Flash" Did someone mention it and I missed it?
They were http://www.firmware.com but they seem to be gone, sadly.
It's a little ISA bus card which has code on it; The code seems to run
as part of the bios bring up and it has allowed me to run newer, modern
drives in old machines, "fixing" the bios problem.
Or at least I thought it did. Maybe I'm on the wrong track.
Every time I've used one I've been happy. I've bought 3-4 of them now.
Perhaps they are not available anymore.
-brad
Hi
I have two (2x) 9-track tape units I no longer need. These are rack
mounted units, not currently in racks. One is brand new. I'm pretty
sure both have pertec interfaces and could be driven from most any
pertec interface.
I believe both will read 800 bpi & 1600 tapes. Not sure if they will go
beyond that. The are physically clean and in good shape.
Anyone want them?
If you do, these need to be picked up. They are way too heavy for
shipping.
ps: if someone take them *both* I will offer to throw in a 19" rack on
wheels. it's clean and in good shape with a dec power module on the
bottom.
-brad
Brad Parker
Heeltoe Consulting
+1-781-483-3101
http://www.heeltoe.com
Does anyone in the northeast have a working Xerox 820-II system they'd
like to part with? I have a line on one out West, but the shipping is
going to be murderous.
Steve
--
Hi,
I've just got my two LPFKs -- one of which is now sitting out on the bench.
The stuff on the codeninja page about the LPFK protocol seems to be
inaccurate; my LPFK is completely mute.
I can set the switch on the back to Loopback, which makes the light for
whatever keys I press light up, but in "live" mode nothing happens at all.
I've got a scope probe on the TX output of the MAX232 (pin 14), which connects
straight to the serial connector, but all I've got is a steady -10V (negative
ten volts) level.
The crystal is oscillating and the 8051 appears to be running code.
If I ground the RXD line (serial break?) and then release it, the LPFK resets
and does its startup dance. Still no output after this, though.
I suspect it's expecting some form of init sequence. Does anyone have an LPFK,
the PC connection kit and the relevant software to hand? A serial trace would
be tremendously useful.
Has anyone managed to get one of these things working?
I did spot a thread in the archive started by Michael Brutman --
<http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/2007-July/082612.html>. Nothing
after that until Paxton Hoag's LPFK bulk-order earlier this year though.
Thanks,
--
Phil.
classiccmp at philpem.me.uk
http://www.philpem.me.uk/
> Just in case anyone's interested, a new and significantly improved
> PERQemu v0.2 is available
Would you be willing to make the sources available at some point to help
document the hardware, and make it possible to put it on something other
than Windows?
Just in case anyone's interested, a new and significantly improved
PERQemu v0.2 is available at:
http://yahozna.dyndns.org/computers/perq/emulator/v0.2/
I would consider this a fairly usable release (v0.1 was very buggy).
Improvements include:
- A 25% or so speed increase (yay!)
- A more or less complete and accurate Z80 simulation, which makes many,
many more things work correctly.
- Kriz Tablet support - now you can actually USE those graphical
applications!
- RS232 support (yes, now YOU can use a VT100 emulator running inside of
a PERQ emulator to talk to your VAX!)
- (Nearly) complete Floppy and Hard Disk support. Enough works to allow
bringing up a completely fresh installation
of POS on a new hard disk, from floppy.
Next up on the list of things to do: Real RasterOp emulation, followed
by 16K CPU support. Can't wait to run Accent on this thing...
If any of you get a chance to try this out, I'd love to hear some feedback.
If anyone out there has any PERQ1/1A compatible software that hasn't
already been archived on Bitsavers (I know, it's unlikely...), please
drop me a line. Much of the software that's been archived is for the
PERQ2, which is incompatible in tiny (but annoying) ways. In
particular, versions of POS G.x or any release of Accent that can run on
the PERQ1A would be wonderful to have.
(As an aside: Al Kossow - thank you so much for Bitsavers...)
Additionally, if any of you have working PERQ1's and are willing to run
it for a few hours to dump an image of your hard disk, let me know. It
would be nice to have some other "real" hard disk images to work with.
Thanks,
Josh
Yep. price > $1,000 == investment grade
AT this point I would usually remark about how
rare machines didn't used to be about big bucks,
but that horse died long, long ago.
I'll return to my coffin now . . . .
-- Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
Got it! Actually I got it for less than I expected -- $1275. Still,
its the single most expensive item I've bought to date. However, I'd
say this is going to be one of the most important items in my
collection of graphics gear.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
____________________________________________________________
Fast Computer Training. Click here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3mAUC2eSzWdxFOW3XKWiahm67…
Against better judgement, I attempted to low-level format a Plus
Hardcard 20 and completely borked it (with the wrong format, the
controller won't init and the thing is now a brick). Does anyone have
the Plus Hardcard 20 install diskette?
The HardCard is shipped in a partitioned and formatted state, with a
number of files included on it. The directory of files is as follows:
INSTALL EXE 47479 1-01-80 12:06a
HCD BAT 30 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD1 BAT 128 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD2 EXE 54769 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD3 DAT 13440 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD3 DIF 704 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD6 SCR 4224 1-01-80 12:07a
PREPARE BAT 235 1-01-80 12:08a
SHELL BAT 18 1-01-80 12:07a
LIGHT COM 145 1-01-80 12:07a
SOUND COM 145 1-01-80 12:07a
PATCHFMT EXE 12670 1-01-80 12:08a
INSTALL DAT 425 1-01-80 12:06a
The original Plus install program creates a floppy diskette containing
the Plus files, as above, but also performs several other operations to
make it what they refer to as the "REINSTALL" diskette. This Reinstall
diskette can later be used for reformatting the HardCard.
Anyone have this?? I am killing myself for bricking the card and would
really love to get it back.
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
Eric J Korpela wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Al Hartman <alhartman at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Why not try adding a PCI IDE adapter? It will have it's own BIOS that will
>> over-ride the internal BIOS.
>
>With an Award 486 BIOS v1.01, this machine doesn't have PCI slots. In
>fact I doubt that it would even have VESA Local Bus (VLB) slots. I
>would make a wild assed guess that this is a reworked 386 motherboard
>with 7 ISA slots, 3 of which are 16bit and one of which has a
>proprietary 32bit ISA extension for use as memory expansion.
>
>How close did I come, Kurt?
>
>Eric
>
>
I don't know exactly. This machine was bought used and I am only just
starting to learn things about it. I wish I could be of more help.
Fred Cisin wrote:
>
>Does the Packard Bell hardware support cable select?
>
I honestly don't know. I had thought they all did.
>> Can someone suggest a good book that goes into this type of thing?
>
>Scott Mueller's Repairing and Upgrading PCs
>prob'ly 3 or 4 editions before the current one. Try maybe ed 12 or 13
>
>
>
I will look for a copy of it. Thanks.
Michael Lee wrote:
>
>As for books, just an old copy of Upgrading and Repairing PCs is a great
>reference in my opinion.
>
>
Thanks, Michael. I'll look for a copy of it.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
>Given that this is a 486, I don't think that the BIOS is your
>problem. I've used OPTI chipset 486s with two drives with no
>problem.
>
>What kind of IDE cable are you using to hook up the second drive? If
>it's an 80-conductor (UDMA) cable, then it's likely that the old IDE
>controller can't see the drive. You need the 40-conductor cable.
>You may also have to jumper the drive to restrict it to 8GB or less
>(some drives can do this).
>
>FWIW,
>Chuck
>
>
The cable is a 40-pin ribbon cable (the old kind).
Hi!
I am continuing work on the N8VEM project. So far the SBC phase appears to
be a success. There are many successful builders.
The next phase has started. I just received an order of ECB backplane PCBs.
I am assembling my own ECB backplane using standard off-the-shelf-parts.
The ECB backplane can be used with the N8VEM SBC for IO expansion. It is
intended for the "heavy" IO devices like Disk controllers and video boards.
I am presently working on an ECB bus monitor to assist in the development of
builder developed ECB peripherals.
However, the ECB bus monitor will probably not be available for several
weeks.
After the ECB bus monitor project, I will continue on with the N8VEM Disk IO
peripheral. It will have an IDE and NEC765 based FDC.
All hardware and software information is freely available and I will help
you the best I can to build your system.
Obviously, most builders are highly skilled individuals who choose to highly
customize their systems and don't need any of my help.
Builders are encouraged to share their experiences on the N8VEM forums to
help others. This has been quite successful in identifying and resolving
various bugs.
If you are interested in either the N8VEM SBC or ECB backplane PCBs to build
your own home brew Z80 CP/M computer, please contact me offline.
The SBC and the ECB backplane PCBs are available for low cost ($20 each plus
shipping).
Thank you in advance. Have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
PS, you can get additional information here:
http://groups.google.com/group/n8vem
You can find a Terak emulator here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bk-terak-emu/
Schematics of the boards would be nice to find.
I have pics of the boards on bitsavers.
If it ends up you're missing boards, I have a CPU, but
no monitor or keyboard, and at this point it seems about
as likely to finding a kb/monitor for my PERQ.
Geez, that hurts. They're 'investment grade'
systems now. Major bummer.
I saw a couple, some years ago, rusting away in a
scrapyard in the midwest. They used to belong to
Boeing. Damaged beyond all repair.
Lots of heartache to go around . . . .
-- Steven Hirsch <snhirsch at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's listed for $199 plus shipping for the main unit
<sigh> I picked up three or four units with disk drives about 12 years
ago at University of Vermont's surplus sale. Had no idea what they were
and could not find anyone who did. Ended up parting them out and keeping
the drive mechanisms.
Blast.
Steve
--
____________________________________________________________
Click to make millions by owning your own franchise.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m6iRzCLyaA7qgoeQCz0rN6r7…
Does anybody have a PC board cad layout of the DEC card edge connector?
I was hoping to find it in PCB (http://pcb.sourceforge.net/index.html)
format.
I would like to have some boards fabricated that were just fingers and
connection pads. I will attach the fingers to some Vector boards and do
point-to-point wiring. I have some project ideas for OMNIBUS and QBus,
but DEC protoboards are rare and/or expensive.
I have little experience with layout work and so far have been
frustrated by my attempts.
-chuck
Hi Dave,
> I'd love to see something like this happen. Are the Lilith's
> internals documented well enough to allow for something like this?
They weren't until Jos Dreesen provided the ftp address:
ftp://jdreesen.dyndns.org/ftp/lilith
What there was effectively user documentation / research papers on
the Lilith hardware / software and the Medos operating system and
a PC version of the Lilith modula-2 compiler (with an MCode interpreter)
in both source and object form.
But now we have systems disks, source code, microcode and schematics.
So we can emulate lilith at a variety of levels from, say, a simple
Linux/X11 software version to a low-level TTL reproduction (thought you'd
have to source AMD29xx bit-slice processor parts). Importantly for me
the new information contains it's bitmap formats so my MCode interpreter
in 'C' can support the missing graphics opcodes.
Lilith is really an impressive European graphics workstation, which
although not as revolutionary as the Alto was certainly radical for the
time even though it predated the Macintosh by only 2 or 3 years.
Amongst its many interesting facets:
* The display was geared to PAL video standards, hence the 768x594, 50Hz
interlaced format (of course this means it can be emulated on any SVGA or higher-resolution display).
* MCode is well suited to microcode and cpu emulation making it easily
ported to the pdp-11, and 8086.
* They used a kind of 8086 segmentation scheme to get around 64kW limits.
* It could run Modula-2 about 3x faster than an Alto could run Mesa.
* It was a true programmer's machine running Modula-2 from the
ground up. In that sense it was an experiment in using the latest GUI
ideas for systems development (wheras Alto was primarily an experiment in
easy-to-use personal computing for non-technical people).
In the end it's the use of MCode which should allow a firmware-level emulation to run original systems disks on a simple Microcontroller and that kinda interests me: A lilith for only a few ?/?/$ :-)
So, one day I'll have my own Lilith, and it will fit in my pocket ;-)
-cheers from Julz @P
---------Original Message(s):
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:24:55 -0700
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Upgrading early BIOS
On 14 Aug 2008 at 10:55, M H Stein wrote:
> Well, I never knew that just replacing the cable in my 386 and 486 systems
> would speed things up; live and learn. I always thought that if the mobo
> wasn't pin 34 aware and UDMA capable then the cable wouldn't have much
> effect on the transfer mode. AFAIK in order to use UDMA all three items
> have to be UDMA capable, the mobo, the cable and the drives, although
> I'd say that, assuming it's UDMA aware, the mobo controls the speed
> depending on what kind of cable and drives it sees. Semantics?
Partly, I suppose. I can speak only from (a pile of) experience.
Using a UDMA cable can create some real problems with older systems.
And some early supposedly-UDMA-capable systems can't handle the full
transfer rate of UDMA-133.
IDE's pretty much been a mess from Day One. For example, I've got an
early IDE drive that flips the endian-sense on the word pair returned
for the total number of sectors on the drive. It was not uncommon
for drives from two different manufacturers not to work as master-
slave on the same cable.
At any rate, for the OP my advice stands. Use a 40-conductor cable
and forget about cable select--jumper for master and slave. And
cross your fingers and offer up a chicken or two to whatever deity is
in charge of IDE operation.
Cheers,
Chuck
----------Reply:
Ah, now those 3 paragraphs I agree with 100% (although I'm not sure that
IDE deities care for chicken); anything else was surely just semantics ;-)
m
Hi,
I am writing a little 68000 ASM code so I can add a few of my own commands to AMOS Basic. Whilst searching online I found this great page:
http://www.virtualdub.org/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=84
It mentions a "green-covered" issue of Byte with programming tips for the 68000 (eg. moveq #0 is faster than clr.l 0!). Does anyone have this issue and can I have a copy of it? Or at the very least, the issue number so I can hunt it down, please?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Hi,
I found a program, which converts a .brd file into Protel format. I
can import Protel format into my Altium designer system.
If you still interested, please send me your files. Thanks.
By the way, I used EAGLE more than 20 years ago, but it doesnt meet
any of the design creterias of commercial PCB development, so I drop
it. Maybe the system is better now, but I can tell you, I dont need a
day or a week to create a component, I just need 10 minutes to create
components with 20 to 40 Pins, including different packages (Through
hole and SMD). And I am not a?professional PCB designer, I only do two
or three simple projects a year.
Cheers
Gerhard
Something over a year ago you posted that you had a backup copy of the
software for the Intronics Pocket Programmer. Is this perchance the original
parallel printer port version? Due to a calamity of stupid human tricks when
the Company I work for sold off one of its product lines the software for
the programmer (which we still have) went with the sale and I suddenly have
a need to burn some 2764 EPROMS to upgrade the firmware in a old system but
I can't get approval for a new burner "because we'll never need it again"
(famous last words) so if you still have the software I'd be interested.
TIA,
Bob Fay
Bob Fay
Mutualink
Mail: rf.technologies at gmail.com
----------Original Message(s):
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:49:02 -0700
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Upgrading early BIOS
On 13 Aug 2008 at 9:12, Eric J Korpela wrote:
> The concept of "cable select" hadn't been invented when this machine
> was built. Use master/slave.
Is not the operation of "cable select" a function of the cable and
not the mobo? If the OP is using a "cable select" IDE cable, he can
use CS with no problem.
That business with him mentioning CS is what made me wonder if he
wasn't also using a UDMA cable (which by the standard also supports
CS). (It's starting to get pretty hard to find *new* non-UDMA cables
nowadays). If that's the case, then any UDMA-capable drives will be
operating in that mode, which will not work with his old system. If
he's using non-UDMA drives, then the cable won't matter.
Cheers,
Chuck
---------------Reply:
AFAIK cable select has always been an option with Parallel ATA drives,
although it was rarely used in pre-UDMA days; the cable was obviously
different (40 conductors with standard connectors vs. 80 conductors and
unique special connectors) and the order of the drives was usually reversed
(i.e. the slave on the end of the cable).
It's the motherboard that determines the cable type and mode from pin 34,
which is grounded at the mobo end in a UDMA cable, so if the mobo isn't
UDMA-aware I don't think the drives would be, and the cable wouldn't matter.
Also, not all drives supported CS.
Bottom line: don't use CS with pre-UDMA drives, cables and/or motherboards
unless you're certain that all three support it, and even master/slave can be
problematic with very old IDE drives.
More info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Drive_Electronics
m
------------------------------
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:02:51 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: IBM EGA Programming manual: anyone have a copy?
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Message-ID: <m1KSnuA-000J1gC at p850ug1>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>
>> I'm searching for a copy of the official IBM EGA programming
>> manual/reference manual.
>> If I recall correctly, in order to actually GET that manual you needed
>> to have bought the $150? CGA/MDA programming/reference manual (or
>> something like that) and have sent in the little registration card, and
>> IBM sent you the EGA one in the mail.
>> Does anyone have a copy of it?
>>
>
> I assuem this is not the EGA section from the O&A Techref. I have that,
> it inculdes the BIOS ROM source listing, schematics, and details of all
> the I/O ports used, but no explict programing info with examples.
>
>
>> (a copy of the cga/mda one would be nice too, but isn't nearly as important)
>> Contact me off-list (or on-list if you'd like) if you do, I'm quite
>>
>
> Again, I have the apporopriate TechRef sections...
>
> -tony
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
Yes, it was that. Barry Watzman sent me a scan of his photocopied copy
of it.
--
Jonathan Gevaryahu
jgevaryahu(@t)hotmail(d0t)com
jzg22(@t)drexel(d0t)edu
More stuff I'd forgotten I had. I was starting to build an
8080-based S-100 computer in the late 1970's, but lost interest
when I bought an Apple IIe system for "only" $2000 (in 1982
dollars!)
Anyway, there is:
1) Wameco CPU-1, mostly populated including the 8080A. Looks like
the 8224 and 8228 are not there, though.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=1zef37s&s=4
2) Ithaca Audio 8K 2102 board, fully socketed and populated.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=29lefr8&s=4
3) Piiceon 8K Program Saver (2708 EPROM programmer). Complete
except for the TL497CN switching regulator chip. Includes two
2708's.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2r7x7jt&s=4
NOTE: The above three boards were never powered up or tested. No
idea if they will actually work or not!
4) Solid State Music VB-1B Video Interface. This one was actually
working with a different (homebrewed) 8080A board way back in
1979. I think it's 64 characters x 16 lines, monochrome of course.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2qa6bde&s=4
Please make offer on one or all. Shipping will be from zip 65775
(US).
Somewhere I have a Wameco "Little Mother Board" backplane too, but
haven't gotten that far down into the junkpile yet.
thanks
Charles
Why not try adding a PCI IDE adapter? It will have it's own BIOS that
will over-ride the internal BIOS.
You can even add a PCI SATA adapter for that matter.
Computer Geeks have them pretty cheap.
IF your 486 Board has PCI Slots. I know I have an ISA IDE Adapter from
Future Domain here that I've never used, but I don't know if it's going
to work any better with newer drives.
Al
If anyone on the list is aware of Sigma equipment still in existence,
please
contact me. I am aware that Honeywell forcibly retired the systems as
service
contracts expired in the early 80s, and that this will be very rare if
it does
exist at all.
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Alderson
RichA at vulcan.com
Server Engineer, PDPplanet Project (206)
342-2239
Vulcan, Inc., 505 5th Avenue S, Seattle, WA 98104 (206)
465-2916 cell
----------Original Message:
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:48:09 -0600
From: "B M" <iamvirtual at gmail.com>
Subject: Paper Tape Reader
Does anyone know of a source for a [relatively] cheap paper tape
reader suitable for reading standard DEC paper tapes? I have several
paper tapes from a PDP-11/20 that I would like to read, and of course,
share :-). Something like the OP-80 from Oliver Engineering would be
suitable.
Thanks.
--barrym
----------Reply:
I've got 4 or 5 different models of PPT readers (and some perfs), but
none quite as simple as the OP-80 and they'd all require some custom
interfacing; what's [relatively] cheap ???
Contact me off-list if interested; thanks.
mike
Does anyone here have a collection of Questbusters newsletters? I just
acquired some from my brother who asked me to sell them. I'd like to see
if I can get scans gathered together.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
About the web page I posted the link for yesterday:
http://www.4004.com/
I emailed the owner of the site to ask a question and got an interesting response:
The right-hand 4004 exhibit photo at the top of the page looks like a 4004 reproduced with surface mount devices on a PC board. Is that what it is? If so, where is it specifically discussed in the text?
Thanks,
Bill
Hi Bill,
Those are indeed surface-mount transistors positioned where the original transistors are on the chip, but the photo is of a non-functional prototype currently on exhibit at the Intel Museum. Alas, we are still working on our ultimate goal of building a fully functional reproduction of the 4004, and displaying that in a museum or two. There is no write-up because this ambitious part of the saga is still in-progress, and because we're all busy professionals with "day jobs," there is currently no estimated completion date.
Since you expressed an interest, here's where we're at: we have a verified netlist from the schematics, and an unverified netlist we painstakingly extracted from the mask artwork. It contains key geometry information we need for layout and routing, but also some errors we need to find and fix. We ran into a snag reconciling the two netlists (it is an "NP hard" problem), but I think we're getting close to a solution. Then we can move to the PC board layout stage, build another giant prototype, and start debugging... I'm crossing my fingers and praying that we can finish the project by this upcoming 37th anniversary of the 4004 product announcement back on November 15 of 1971.
--Tim
> It's listed for $199 plus shipping for the main unit
It's being watched.
Thanks to sniping, and eBay hiding of the bidder name, there
is no incentive to 'tag' anything with a bid any more.