So, the MM11-U manual (EK-MF11U-MM-003) describes (pg. 3-12) a set of jumpers
(W5-W7) on the G235 card (X and Y selection line current generators - those
for the inhibit lines are on the G114) which adjust the bias current for the
selection line generators. It goes on to say:
"Jumpers W5-W7 are factory cut to adjust the bias current to its
optimal value and they should not be changed."
There's apparently a similar adjustment for the timing of the sense strobe
(although I can't find the description of that circuitry). So I have two
observations, based on this.
The first is that the original procedure for setting those jumpers is likely
lost, it's probably only in some internal DEC documentation. The manual says
(Section 5.4.2, "Sense Strobe Delay and Drive Current Adjustments"):
"Correction of any failure in either the sense strobe delay or drive
current circuits on the G235 module that would require reconfiguration
of the jumpers within these circuits should _not_ be attempted in the
field. Replace the faulty module with a spare G235 module and return the
faulty G235 module to the factor for repair."
These cards are old, component values may have drifted, and so perhaps these
might need to be adjusted - but we'll need to work out a procedures for doing
so, if so.
We _do_ seem to have a test to know _if_ the bias current is properly
adjusted - see Section 5.3.4, "Drive Current Checks", and also for the strobe
delay (Section 5.3.3, "Sense Strobe Delay Checks"). So I guess in theory, if
a G235 card fails one of these tests, we could change the smallest value
jumper, and see if that made things worse or better, and then loop. So
perhaps all is not lost.
The second is that I was worried that these boards were 'tuned' to be part of
a set. E.g. one of the components, in the circuit that the W5-W7 jumpers are
part of, is a thermistor on the core stack board. I couldn't tell if the
jumpers were just for dealing with component variations on the G235 board, or
if they also include variation elsewhere - i.e. that MM11-U's came as tuned
board sets which should not be 'mix and matched'.
However, that second chunk of text I quoted alleviated that concern:
apparently one _can_ replace one G235 with another, without swapping out all
the boards in the set.
Which means that the 'mixing and matching' that has happened to these boards
since they were removed from their machines (I myself am guilty of this - I
pulled a couple of MM11-U sets, and didn't carefully keep the boards in their
original sets) has probably not caused any problems.
Noel
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
> From: Murray McCullough <c.murray.mccullough at gmail.com>
> Subject: Techno-savvy...
> Message-ID:
> <CAMvyYF-YXr8XFD4q9d1uZrOBBfUgnS=e=NTM8zSGTermw-tT2A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> What is a techno-savvy student? Can classic computers possibly give an
> answer? I used early microcomputers in my electronics classroom I
> taught in the 70?s. Computers back then were rather primitive, not
> much better than calculators, but did mimic human learning ? well
[story cut]
I liked this story, reminded me of my education in the late 80's early
90's - I was the "computer go to guy" so instead of the shiny new PS/2's
the district had recently purchased they "stuck" me witth the 5150 in the
back that no one wanted to use. The things I was able to make that thing
do with just two floppies.... :)
>
> So what is a techno-savvy student now: Conversant in using a
> technological gadget to enhance his/her life? Or being able to build a
> computing workstation in high school? Or for simply possessing a basic
[chop]
Whenever this comes up in the context of today's youth (where they tell me
they'll take my job one day) I just have to laugh. The vast majority (not
all, as that would be unfair, and I have met some younger than me folks
that know their stuff) of youth today know how to USE the device, but not
necessarily how to fix it if it breaks physically or logically (I'll leave
out that fixing of these tablets/phones/pads physically is usually a board
swap ....).
As Kirk said in Star Trek II, The Wrath of Khan, "You have to learn WHY
things work on a starship."
Fred
Does anyone know the origins of the term 'motherboard'?
I've always associated it with computers and assumed that it started
appearing somewhere around 1980, with the fading out of passive backplane
systems and arrival of machines which put more functionality onto a 'core'
PCB into which other cards were plugged. I don't recall ever seeing it used
when referencing earlier big iron, but maybe I've just missed it.
I had the case lid off a Fluke digital multimeter which hails from 1972
earlier, and was surprised to see it written as part of a warning there
("ensure that all cards are securely plugged into the motherboard before
applying power", or similar - unfortunately I didn't grab a photo at the
time).
cheers
Jules
Where do you live?
I guess I'm too far to help, but I'd like to have that image and look into it...
-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: David Griffith <dave at 661.org>
Data:29/02/2016 09:24 (GMT+01:00)
A: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Oggetto: CP/M version 2.1 found
I found an 8-inch floppy disk labeled with "CP/M V2.0 9/4/79" which is
crossed out and replaced below with "CP/M V2.1 7/13/80".? I don't see
mention of version 2.1 at http://www.cpm.z80.de.? Do I have something
unique?? Who can I trust to image this and put the contents on the net?
--
David Griffith
dave at 661.org
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Hi all,
There's an image of a 3B2 Diagnostics disk floating around, but
I'd like to try to confirm what model of 3B2 it was built for.
I'm trying to run the "filledt" program from this diagnostics disk on
my 3B2/400 emulator, and seeing some REALLY weird behavior. There are
several ways to transfer control in the WE32100 CPU. You can CALL a
procedure, which saves minimal state; you can GATE to a procedure,
which is what interrupts to, and save more state; or you can CALLPS,
which is a full process switch and saves the most state. My simulator
can't run the "filledt" program because it is trying to CALL a ROM
routine that expects to have been GATE-ed to. The procedure looks
back in the stack for the last saved PSW, which isn't there.
Sorry for the technical wall of text, but long story short: I don't
know whether there is a bug in my simulator leading to this behavior
(likely), or whether the 3B2 Diagnostics disk was built for the model
500 or 1000, which have totally different ROMs with different
procedures at different vectors.
Does anyone have a 3B2 diagnostics disk that is 100% verified to
have come with a 3B2/300 or 3B2/400?
-Seth
--
Seth Morabito
web at loomcom.com
> From: Bill Degnan
> I will see what else I have available.
As far as I have been able to determine, the only backplane that supports the
MM11-UP is the MF11-U backplane. Does anyone know of anything else that does?
Noel
I found an 8-inch floppy disk labeled with "CP/M V2.0 9/4/79" which is
crossed out and replaced below with "CP/M V2.1 7/13/80". I don't see
mention of version 2.1 at http://www.cpm.z80.de. Do I have something
unique? Who can I trust to image this and put the contents on the net?
--
David Griffith
dave at 661.org
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> From: Bill Degnan
> My thought is that with my PDP 11/05 with S chassis / BA11-K.
Urr, if you're talking about the backplane the CPU is in (which can hold one
MM11-U), I think you're out of luck: there's no slot for the M7259 parity
controller to plug into (at least, one the one in the -11/05S-10S manual).
Noel
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Richard Loken <rlloken at telus.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Mouse wrote:
>
>>> Computer games require all you can give them [...]
>>
>> Only if your idea of "games" is "slick-looking realtime 3D-rendering
>> games". There are lots of games that work perfectly well on 3100-class
>> (and even slower) machines, such as roguelikes (rogue, larn, hack,
>> etc), text adventures (ADVENT, DUNGEON, etc), phantasia, Seahaven,
>> Klondike...the list is long.
>
> But those are Computer Games! Not computer games. It is a long time
> since I have played rogue.
I've been meaning to ask this question since I started cleaning up
terminals this year... what are some favorites? Some of the obvious
classics are:
Adventure
Zork (and anything else on a Zmachine)
Scott Adams Adventures
Wumpus
Anything in Dave Ahl's "101 BASIC Computing Games"
Empire
Star Trek
rogue/hack
Larn/Ularn
But what are some other favorites? I've been running a monthly
"retrogaming night" at our Makerspace and so far have brought out a
C-64, a PPC Mac, and an 8032 PET. I'm looking to add a PDP-8 (via
Oscar Vermuelen's PiDP-8, for portability) and (at first) a simh RT-11
box and/or VAX running VMS, though I have plenty of real DEC gear -
it's a matter of transport and storage space). I have a VT220 and an
IBM 3101 (very VT52-like with a working terminfo entry) already on
site and can add additional terminals if this becomes popular (I may
drag in a VT52 just for the excuse to clean one up).
I have the Commodore end pretty well covered. I'm looking for
suggestions for 80x24 text games that can be played on an ANSI (VT100)
terminal and especially non-ANSI (VT52 or that IBM 3101) on
Unix/Linux, VMS, and RT-11. So in general, anything that uses curses
or direct ANSI sequences or just spews text to a glass tty.
-ethan