> From: William Donzelli
> Building a complete ENIAC replica would indeed be hard. If only exact
> proper NOS parts were used, I might just say impossible.
One other component I didn't see listed: rotary switches. ENIAC used tons of
them, originally for inputting static data (think ROM :-), and later to hold
tables used when they converted it to a sorta-stored-program machine (think
uROM :-).
And what about the special plug wires (and the male and female connectors used
thereon) which were used to 'program' the machine for a given problem - are
those still available?
Noel
>> Jacob Ritorto wrote:
>> Yeah, but troff is too hard.
I'm going to pass over the obvious question ('why would anybody be doing word
processing on a PDP-11 in this day and age' :-), and ask if nroff is also too
hard? Since it's only intended for character devices (line printers, etc)
it's not quite as complex as troff.a
I'm not sure if Bell had anything simpler; I'll have to look at my V6 Unix
manual set.
> From: Ian S. King
> But ... Emacs (originally EMACS, "eight megabytes and continuously
> swapping") .. is ever going to run on a PDP-11.
If you restrict yourself to GNU Emacs, yes. But there are more implementations
of EMACS in the world than that bloated monstrosity!
We ran an EMACS on V6 Unix at MIT, I forget who wrote it, I think it was
someone at BBN; it was quite a nice one. It was quite customizable (but that
have only been key bindings and settings, not sure if it included code), and
it had all the usual features: multiple buffers and windows, etc. (In fact,
it was so painful to use on a VT52, with its small screen, that I migrated to
a Ann Arbor Ambassador terminal, with its much large screen, as soon as it
became available.)
I have several sets of backup tapes from one of the V6 machines at MIT; I
sent one off to Chuck Guzis, and he's gotten almost all the bits off of it (a
few records had unrecoverable read errors, but the vast majority were OK -
like roughly 15 read errors in around 1500 records).
I hope to annouce a vast trove of stuff soon from my tapes (once I figure out
how to interpret the bits - they are written by a sui generis application
called 'saveRVD', and the _only_ documentation of how it did it is... on that
tape! :-) That includes a lot of code written at MIT, as well as stuff from
elsewhere.
Coming soon, in addition to that EMACS, should be BCPL, Algol, LISP and some
other languages; MACRO-11 and the DEC linker (which I guess are also
available from UNSW tapes), but _also_ programs to convert back and forth
>from .REL to a.out format, and to .LDA format; and a whole ton of other
applications (I have no idea what all is there - if anyone is interested, I
can make a pass through my manuals and try and make a list).
Noel
Reposting, I'm a little worried these do not exist anymore. I've already
tried every reseller on the planet. Generous Bounty for any of the
following:
HP 12920B Asynchronous Multiplexer :
12920-60001 Upper Select Code Data Board
12920-60002 Lower Select Code Data Board
12922-60001 Control Board
Or
HP 12920A Asynchronous Multiplexer:
12921-60001 Upper Select Code Data Board
12921-60002 Lower Select Code Data Board
12922-60001 Control Board
Even single boards of any of the above would be a big help.
Best,
J
So, we have the ABC, Colossus, Manchester Baby, and now the EDSAC.
Anyone for the ENIAC? Univac I? IAS machine? Whirlwind?
How come 3 of the 4 are in Britain?
On 2014-Nov-29, at 9:12 PM, John Foust wrote:
> The National Museum of Computing unveils EDSAC re-creation:
>
> http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30131447
On 24 November 2014 at 22:40, Holm Tiffe <holm at freibergnet.de> wrote:
> I understand that it will be very expensive to change such a "naturally
> grown" infrastructure and this is that cause that I wrote that the US
> should have changed this long before nowi, where it is really to late to do
> that.
[upgrading (the US) infrastructure]
But I'm wondering about Japan. As was mentioned by someone else
earlier, their's an example of how it shouldn't be done.
However, as part of that they already have a mix (so they're kind of
used to that) of 50Hz and 60Hz depending on where you live.. and they
use US (or as close as doesn't matter) plugs. At 100V. The whole
system is quite frustrating, and scary to look at as well.
Rickety-rackety. Reminds me of underdimensioned old 6V car wiring,
with much of the same problems (dimming, heat..).
So what I was thinking is that it should, in principle, be possible
for Japan to introduce 230V in new areas (and new areas are built
constantly), with European plugs not only to make it safer but also to
clearly make the distinction. That's something that I believe could
work in Japan, people tend to pay attention. I'm not so sure it would
work anywhere else. That's something I would like to see. Not only
because of my old linear transformer computer gear.. or the
impossibility to use my favourite bread machine (doesn't come with an
100V AC motor). 100V isn't particularly energy efficient when it comes
to distribution, and Japan needs to become much, much more energy
efficient.
> Here in germany 1 phase power lines simply don't exist. The entire
> infrastructure is build with 3 phases and the phase balancing is made on
> every distribution paneel in every house. This is why it isn't a big
> problem to get a 3 phase outlet installed somewhere you need it.
> Most cables are in the ground, but on the other end of my village here
> (1km distance to the next city) there are some overhead lines with at least
> two transformers on masts that distribute 3x400V to groups of houses.
[3phase]
Same in Norway (I'm traveling between Norway and Japan so experience
both). Or at least in my town. The whole electricity infrastructure
was reworked completely for all of the town some years ago. Everything
moved from poles to sub-ground cabling, and 400V 3phase to every
house, and taken from there. New houses and old ones are done a bit
differently internally though.
Brent H. wrote:
> Would that be these?:
>
> http://www3.telus.net/~bhilpert/tmp/HP2116C/crimps.jpg
> http://www3.telus.net/~bhilpert/tmp/HP2116C/backplane.jpg
>
An almost identical system was used for the backplane wiring on many
Wang Laboratories electronic calculators, from the earliest machines
(LOCI) through the last of the "large form factor" machines (Wang
500/600/700) calculators. Later machines (100, 400 and C-Series) had
much higher levels of integration, which required a lot fewer backplane
interconnects, and thus printed circuit backplanes could be used.
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
[fwiw, is there a better place for FS/Wanted listings? If there's not
some kind of 'commerce' site, should we set one up?]
As most of you know, I work for a company that decommisions data centers
and resells the equipment (usually eBay but sometimes directly). There
are a few things in the triage queue that might be of interest to the
list members. If there is interest, I'll approach my boss, otherwise
they'll be processed as usual.
By default we check eBay for the value before listing anything. At
the very least we value it at scrap value. And no, I can't take anything
out the back door for cheap :-) They're in business to make money.
These will all sell without the hard drives per our contracts with
our customers. As for the HP and IBM, I have not yet climbed back all
the way into the triage area to get more details. The desktops are
accessible to me.
Of course all of these are listed subject to prior sale.
Reply-To set to me personally, but if you have comments e.g. about
appropriateness, please feel free to redirect to the list. I'm a
big boy, I can take it :-)
mcl
3 * Vaxstation 4000 60 (desktop)
1 * Dec 3000 (desktop)
1 * IBM 3490 EC22 (19" rack full)
1 * HP 9000 Model K360 K-Class 9000 (19" rack full)
5 * Digital Personal Workstation 500au (desktop)
2 * Digital Personal Workstation 600a (desktop)
2 * Compaq XP1000 (desktop, appear similar to above)