> From: Al Kossow
> I have to find my qbus rk11 card.
The RKV11-D is a set of 4 quad cards (3 of them the same as the RK11-D) and a
custom 4-slot backplane (different from the RK11-D's), along with another
dual QBUS card, connected via flat cables. It was apparently usually supplied
by DEC in a mounting box of its own.
Noel
> From: Al Kossow
> it's a single-card controller made by Xylogics.
Ah; never heard of that. If you don't mind indulging my curiousity, how did it
connect to the drive (if it used RK05's, and not a Diablo, or something)?
Normal flat cables to a dual card (like the RKV11-D), or a connector on the
back edge (like a UNIVERTER; so it could use a BC11A cable)?
Noel
Hi all,
you're invited to the Update computer club[0] public lecture series
"Updateringar"[1]! Update is a Swedish computer club founded in 1983
whose members tinker with all kinds of computers, from Raspberry Pi to
PDP-12. The club has a big collection of historic computers. In this
lecture series we'll talk about everything related to computers:
Historic and modern computers, operating systems, programming, hardware
projects, creating art with computers, building a computer museum, and
more. We'll start with a classic: the PDP-8.
When: 2021-04-10, 19:00 CEST
Where: https://bbb.cryptoparty.se/b/upd-0mo-m2u-aq8
Get to know the PDP-8 through emulation
An emulator is a program that pretends to be a computer different from
the one the emulator is executing on. This allows execution of software
intended for a physical computer that you do not have. In this talk
Pontus will explain the basics by implementing a fully working PDP-8
emulator and explaining each instruction and feature along the way. The
end result is a working emulator in less than 1000 lines of C code. And
hopefully you will walk away with both an understanding of the classic
PDP-8 computer and emulation.
Pontus Pihlgren (Update)
The lecture is free and open to everyone.
Upcoming: 2021-05-08, 19:00: Forth on microcontrollers. Crest (CCCHB)
Hope to see you there,
Anke
[0] http://www.update.uu.se/index_eng.html
[1] https://www.update.uu.se/wiki/doku.php/projekt:updateringar
Looking to buy any of the IR. INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER KITS WITH SOLAR RADIOS OR SOLAR RADIO EXIMERMENTS? FOR SMECC MUSEUM'S SOLAR ELECTRONICS DISPLAY.? -- ALSO INTERESTED? BY SOME BY OTHER MAKERS TOO ...EMAIL US OFF LIST PLEASE
Sad but true it all looks the same to me most times . In my life time I have typed far more upper case material than upoer...lower stuff..
In usaf the typewriters? we used to send massive? Mars radio messages between name. And families.... had no lower case
Them the years of teletypes,and upoer case computer terminals. .. it's been a hard life... alas
On Sunday, April 4, 2021 Tony Aiuto via cctalk <tony.aiuto at gmail.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 9:44 PM Adrian Stoness <tdk.knight at gmail.com> wrote:
> im pritty sure? he uses his teletype to send us emails
>
LOL.? No excuse.? I like old hardware, but that doesn't mean I use it for
real work.
My hand cranked drills are to show my grandchildren. My 18V battery drive
is what
I actually use.
>
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 8:17 PM Tony Aiuto via cctalk <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
>> Ed. When you type in all caps it looks like you've been owned. Can you
>> tone
>> it down so we know it is real mail.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 6:54 PM ED SHARPE via cctalk <
>> cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looking to buy any of the IR. INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER KITS WITH SOLAR
>> > RADIOS OR SOLAR RADIO EXIMERMENTS? FOR SMECC MUSEUM'S SOLAR ELECTRONICS
>> > DISPLAY.? -- ALSO INTERESTED? BY SOME BY OTHER MAKERS TOO ...EMAIL US
>> OFF
>> > LIST PLEASE
>> >
>>
>
Exactly spend years with those too... I am old
On Sunday, April 4, 2021 Chuck Guzis via cctalk <cclist at sydex.com; cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 4/4/21 8:28 PM, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
>
> Sad but true it all looks the same to me most times . In my life time I have typed far more upper case material than upoer...lower stuff..
> In usaf the typewriters? we used to send massive? Mars radio messages between name. And families.... had no lower case
>
> Them the years of teletypes,and upoer case computer terminals. .. it's been a hard life... alas
>
What's wrong with upper case?? Do you know of any keypunches with lower
case?
--Chuck
At 12:19 AM 3/04/2021 -0600, you wrote:
>On 4/2/21 10:27 PM, Guy Dunphy via cctalk wrote:
>> There are defects in your 'good' flatbed image too - for eg the
>> bleed-through of the orange lettering on the other side of the
>> sheet. The way to correct that is to use a black, highly light
>> absorbent backing sheet. Eg black velvet.
>
>Hum.
>
>Why do so many scanners come with glossy white (usually on foam) backing
>to hold the image down?
>
>I'm questioning why they do that, not your recommendation.
I think it is a combination of habit, and marketting/customer expectations.
People intuitively expect the white backing, and for many scanning tasks
it is preferable. Yet for scanning anything printed on both sides of thin
paper, it's a real problem.
I have a sheet of matt black plastic, and some black velvet cloth for this.
The plastic is easier to use, but the velvet works better for really
thin paper with a lot of visual bleed through. The more light absorbent
the better. If I ever find a sheet of 'vanta black' (new light absorbent
substance, very close to 100%, look it up) I'll be using that.
That's not the only 'strange & unfortunate lack' in typical scanners.
Another is that the raised plastic bezel goes all the way round the glass,
rather than having at least one of the glass long sides be flat right
to the edge, with the scanner sensor also going very close to the edge.
This is needed for scanning sheets larger than the bed, and also very
essential for scanning pages of books that are too thick to allow getting
any page flat on the typical scanner bed.
There are special 'edge scanners' that allow this - draping the book over
the side of the scanner, so one page can be fully flat on the glass.
They cost _much_ more than normal scanners. And yet the actual
construction has very little that would cost more to manufacture.
Construction is just arranged a little differently. The higher cost is
another case of 'marketting.'
Guy
Minerva and SMSQ/E, both related to Sinclair QDOS, the original OS for
the Sinclair QL.
https://youtu.be/yU0ptNyNqcI
And EmuTOS, a FOSS recreation of Atari TOS & GEM, which reached v1.0
about 6 months ago.
https://youtu.be/eqrM4TE5jTM
I knew about the 1st 2, but this video taught me a lot. It's an
insular community and most materials are aimed at people who already
know about it.
I wrote a blog post to explain a bit of the history and context:
https://liam-on-linux.livejournal.com/78738.html
Found via the m68k.info community:
https://m68k.info/#sinclairql:video:SMSQE:mar2021
Which in turn I found when I asked if there were any 16-bit homebrew
computers out there and learned of the Kiwi 68K:
https://www.ist-schlau.de/
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven ? Skype: liamproven
UK: +44 7939-087884 ? ?R (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053