I've read the 745 can use two keyboards. And looking for recommendations
One it the same keyboard that goes with the 9000/300, the 46021A/B/C
and the other is the "PC-101" C1429A/B (and I think C)
Anyone with a 745 ?
-pete
I should post to Nekochan but I'm going here 1st.
600Mhz R14K SGI Fuel, 1G of RAM. 16G HDD. I threw in a soundcard that
*should* work with IRIX but I'm not 100% sure. IRIX 6.5.30 seems to be
loaded. I tried to build/load some of the Nekoware stuff at one point
but ran out of time. Size and weight makes shipping prohibitive
(unless you're willing to pay.) I'm located in the UK now in OX10
(south of Oxford and north of Reading.)
--
-Jon
+44 7465 605833
Does anyone know how to configure the Intel IN-1611 64 k qbus memory board?
I seem to be unable to find documentation online.
https://imgur.com/a/KBIoJ
There a switch block an then also a number of jumper wires.
Hello,
I'm in the pretty same condition, I have a Rainbow 100B without memory
expansion.
Not sure however, about the correct board number, which would fit the 100B.
What should I search for?
Thanks
Andrea
Dear All,
I'm looking for ideas for passing on an old Sun Ultra 10, which I adopted
when my old work was going to bin it. I installed Debian, but have the
original OS media. Unfortunately, 3 moves and 2 kids later my time to
tinker is non-existent, and my partner has made clear this needs to go
before another imminent house move. I notice from my last attempt to boot
that it now has the NVRAM battery problem, which a quick search tells me
may be fixable. Ideally, I would like to hand it over to someone with more
time/motivation (for free) rather than sending to the tip, but I'm stuck
for ideas. I did get in touch with wildfire systems, who said it isn't
economically viable for them even at zero cost. The Ebay market for these
things seems more US-centric and registering for an account and dealing
with postage is more effort than I would like (I live in Sheffield, UK).
Any ideas gratefully received!
Thanks,
Pete
>Here's a writeup for those interested:
>http://www.classic-computers.org.nz/blog/2017-04-15-
adventures-with-an-8-inch-disk-drive-part1.htm
One thing in this project puzzled me. Initially when I was testing the
drive I tried to format it for 77-tracks. I used the command FORMAT B: /u
/T:77 /N:15 . It wouldn't let me. MS-DOS said "
"Formatting 1.15M
parameters not supported by the drive"
After trying a few other things (unsuccessfully) I just tried a straight
FORMAT B: /u
It then formatted it without complaint?
Listening to the head moving, I counted 77 tracks. The last three tracks
the clicking stopped. I'm assuming the head just wrote over that final
track 3 times. MS-DOS told me I'd formatted for 1.2MB.
I'm puzzled why I couldn't format the disk using the /t:77 and /n:15
switches. Did MS-DOS just go by what was in the CMOS. If that's the case,
why have those switches at all? Are they just legacy switches for
pre-CMOS machines?
Anyone know the answer to this?
Terry (Tez)
>
>
I was helping out someone here locally to dig thru a pile of electronics
that he had obtained in helping out a woman clean out her house.
Her husband passed away and she wanted the space back. Apparently the
husband "somehow" dealt in HW repair.
A good number of the items were known broken spares, Shugart 1004 drives
(about 36) and a couple tandem floppies.
Those he found a new home for.
There were a few items that I told him I'd help circulate info on since
they are a bit more specialized
(I'm just trying to help him liquidate the items, he is surprising the
woman who he got it from with a cash gift when this is done)
1) 2 NOS Kennedy 9000 series tape drives. I checked, they look pristine.
There was an invoice that says they're Kennedy 9000-3, 4s models.
2) 9 drive packs. marked ATHANA, which may be RK05 packs (I couldn't find
any markings on them to indicate what size, etc.)
3) Lastly he has two Visual 50 terminals.
This is all in the Atlanta area, so if you have any interest, let me know
and I can relay information to him.
Obviously the Kennedy drives would cost a bit to ship...
Thanks.
Earl
There are a lot of smart people here with wide ranging experiences, so
I like to ask questions from time to time that get more to philosophy.
So "If C is so evil why is it so successful" was one of those
questions.
The answer I see is that it is the path of least resistance to the
most successful outcome in the time horizon of the effort.
Or, it gets the job done.
Personally, I am stuck in the machine control world where things like
symbolic names and type checking are sometimes non-existant. And I
wonder why.
SIL-3 and PLe with stone knives and bearskins.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Chuck Guzis via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 07:03 PM, Charles Dickman via cctalk wrote:
>> The Balkanized nature of programming is interesting.
> You might find more fertile ground plowing the plctalk.net forum when
> your questions relate to the STL/SCL/FBD/LAD/CSF area.
I am familiar with STL (and some of the others). My question was not
for help. I was trying to present a contrast between the nit-picking
the list was doing about C and that fact that a huge amount of mission
critical programming is done in languages that are essentially machine
code.
It was a ham fisted attempt. Don't post after too many high ABV IPA's.
> FWIW, "STL" in Siemens-talk is an acronym for "Statement List". Why it
> isn't "SL" is anyone's guess.
Probably for the same reason that PZD is process data.
> --Chuck
-chuck
I got a request through my web site for a CP/M System Boot Disk for the
Morrow Disk Jockey DMA Controller Board. Anyone have an image I could make
to help this guy out?
Thanks
BIll
Just a heads-up that the 1979 edition of the "pdp11 bus handbook" has a very
serious editing error in it, in the description of UNIBUS arbitration.
On page 38, immediately after step 13 of the NPR Arbitration Sequence
("13. .... SACK must be negated before BBSY may be negated."), it says "A bus
master may issue an interrupt command to the interrupt fielding processor."
Despite its location in the text, this does __NOT__ apply to the "NPR
arbitration sequence" being discussed above. There is an editing error - this
text is (or _should be_) separate from the "NPR Arbitration Sequence" section
just before it; it belongs with "BR Interrupt Arbitration Sequence" - that
header (on pg. 39) was put in the wrong place.
The 1975 "peripherals handbook" has very similar text, but it _does_ have a
section header after the NPR details (line 13 is identical), and before the
start of the (very similar) BR text ("A bus master that has gained control
... through a BRn/BGn arbitration transaction may issue an interrupt command
to the processor.").
Noel