Hi Everyone,
I?m looking for a scan or a printout of the contents of DEC fiche EP-M8436-MA-A.
It?s referenced at the top of page 163 of http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/fiche_200dpi/0254_ind…, and allegedly contains the details for M8436, M8437,M8439, and M8440 boards -- all of which were parts for the Decmate series of machines.
If anyone has access to this (even if you have no way to read it), or has a pointer to where I might find it, I?d very much appreciate if you?d drop me a line.
Thanks very much,
Rob Ferguson
http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/4711
Choice quote:
"I am writing this from the car, sitting in the passenger seat with my shoes off. I have been standing for 12 hours. I've been giving introductions and tours and explanations and theories and everything else that comes when you put a bunch of strangers together with a single-minded purpose. They have been too good. Way better than anybody deserves in the way of volunteers. They have been helpful, kind, inquisitive, dedicated. They have come from miles around. Sometime around 11 a.m., it became very obvious that the 252 banker boxes we have bought or a laughable underestimation. We were going to need more. We are going to need much more, and we were going to need it now. I made a call to the Uline Company, and asked for the impossible: I wanted 8 pallets of boxes, delivered within the day. And within four hours, they arrived. To deliver 1052 banker boxes within 4 hours, combined with the cost of the boxes themselves, was $4000."
> From: Eric Smith
> If a person has any reasonable business justification
But a lot of the people here don't; they're purely hobbyists. So spending
$1K on a piece of test equipment just isn't realistic for them.
Having said that, I do see some DSO's on eBay for not much money (e.g. the
little hand-held ones), and those might be a good alternative to a logic
analyzer - I never used one, so I tend not to think of them.
Noel
Some guy on eBay is selling a ton of QBUS boards, cheap:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/computer_surpluscheap/m.html
Includes deals such as 11/23 CPU's _with_ KTF11 and KEF11 for $30, 11/73 CPU's
for $50, etc, etc.
Anyone recognize those Motorola memory cards? Do we have documentatio for
them?
Noel
> From: Paul Koning
> If you can, avoid black/white scans. The reason is that scanners are
> often noisy in that mode ... Copiers used in scan mode are particularly
> likely to do this. Such documents are also surprisingly hard to read,
> look messy when printed, and utterly fail OCR.
I was talking about scanning prints (which is how this originally came up,
someone said 300 dpi doesn't catch the very fine printing one can find on
them - which is true, I've had issues in this regard too).
I'm using a professional-grade A3-size scanner (found on eBay for the
princely sum of $100 - it's an older model, with a SCSI interface) - for
scanning fold-out prints, the typical A4/8-1/2x11 scanner won't eat them
whole.
And of course OCR is a non-concept for prints.
For manuals (text), on the other hand, 300 dpi is of course fine.
Noel
> From: Sean Caron
> I have found that even fairly fine detail reproduces okay with a 300
> DPI scan ... there's no need in scanning with extraneous bit depth and
> then you start to get people complaining about file sizes
I have found that one can generally have one's cake, and eat it too:
if I scan at 600dpi in black and white, and then use "CCITT Group 4"
compression, the resulting images (of prints) are ~200KB per page.
Is that small enough? :-)
Noel
Now that I (hopefully) have my PDP 11/23 running (it passes CPU and memory
tests, anyway), I've been messing with my RLV11 so I can use my RL02.
For a first step, I'm trying to run the VRLBC0 diskless diagnostic to check
the controller. I checked that the address and vector switches are set to
the defaults according to he manual, and also verified them with a
multimeter.
The manual says the default vector address is 330, though the diagnostics
default to 160. I tried it both ways with the same result, though I should
be on 330.
I'm not actually sure what "BR LEVEL" refers to, so I left that at the
default.
This is a PDP 11/23 with an H-9273 backplane. I have the M8186, M8067,
M8043, then the two RLV11 boards, M8013 and M8014, then an M8012.
Here's a sample run. It appears to start, but never does anything else. If
I give it a bad address it does complain, so I think I have the switches
correct.
Does anyone know what I might try next? Thanks!
.R VRLBC0
VRLBC0.BIC
DRSSM-G2
CVRLB-C-0
RLV12 DISKLESS
UNIT IS RLV12, RLV11, OR RL11
RSTRT ADR 145702
DR>START
CHANGE HW (L) ? Y
# UNITS (D) ? 1
UNIT 0
RLV12 (L) Y ? N
RLV11 (L) Y ? Y
CSR ADDRESS (O) 174400 ?
VECTOR (O) 160 ? 330
BR LEVEL (O) 4 ?
CHANGE SW (L) ? Y
ERROR LIMIT FOR AUTO-DROP (D) 0 ?
ALL REMAINING QUERIES ARE FOR OPTIONAL (MANUFACTURING)
G5388 TEST-LOOP-MODULE SET-UP. USE <^Z> TO BYPASS.
G5388 TLM INSTALLED (L) N ? N
MMU AVAILABLE
MEMORY SIZE 124 KW
18 BIT ADDRESSING
--
Ben Sinclair
ben at bensinclair.com
> From: Johnny Billquist
> DEC's memory boards never had any jumpers for PMI as such.
Yes, and if you plug one of their PMI memory boards into a Q/Q backplane, it
will emit magic smoke, too! :-)
I think that's why this thing has the jumpers - to allow it to be used in a
Q/Q backplane. It would, of course, only be normal (slower) QBUS memory, but
at least one could use it there.
However, I am unable to verify that hypothesis. (See below.)
I looked at the jumpers along the edge in the C/D finger region, and a lot
of them _do_ connect to pins used in the PMI bus. (Confusingly, a number
connect to _other_ pins - I can see I have some detective work in front
of me here!)
However, that made it likely that the one that had jumpers on all those pins
was configured for PMI use, so I rolled the dice, and tried plugging that
board into a Q22/CD backplane, along with a KDJ11-B, and after a short bout of
'tired memory' (see my previous post), it did come up as a 4MB PMI memory!
(Parity, though, not CRC - which might make sense, I guess - it has 148
memory chips on it, which is a multiple of 37, so 32 + byte parity, plus a
spare chip, I would guess?)
However, when I plugged the other one in - nada. No response at all; the boot
PROM bitched about 'no memory at 0'. So I'm not sure _what_ that
configuration is for.
So then I took a flier (although the cards use the identical PCB, they do
have a few minor differences in chip rev in a couple of the programmable
chips), and put the jumper config from the working PMI card onto the other
card, and it did 'sort of' come up as a PMI card.
The boot PROM was complaining about "Memory CSR Error" (I'll have to
investigate that further), _but_ the memory was shown (by the boot PROM 'map'
command) as PMI, and my own memory-test program showed it was all working OK.
Well, at least we have a jumper config that allows us to use these cards
as PMI memory!
Noel
So I've seen an odd phenomenon on some older QBUS memory boards I've got in.
I can't understand it, and I'm wondering if anyone else has i) seen it, or ii)
understand the cause.
What happens is that the _first_ time I plug them in, some don't work - some
(maybe all, sometimes) locations are mangling the data (I forget whether it's
dropped or picked bits). Oh, and we're talking 4164's/41256's (or equivalents)
here, for the actual devices.
However, if I let them sit for a bit (powered off), and then try again, they
work fine!
I first experienced this phenomenon on some M8044's, which have on-board
electrolytic filter caps, so I was guessing it was caused by some sort of
noise caused by the caps not working, and after a little while powered on, the
caps reformed, and things started to work.
However, I just experienced the same phenomenon on a Clearpoint DCME/Q4E board
- which doesn't have any electrolytic caps on it. So that can't be it.
Anyone have any clue what's going on?
(Oh, and of course, for others - if you buy and old memory board, and it
doesn't work... don't immediately put it in the 'bad' pile, wait a bit, and
try again. You might be seeing this.)
Noel
Hi Evan and others who might have been wondering, I managed to find
out what happened to the Burroughs B7800 that was "under the stairs"
at Monash university.
The good news is that the interesting parts, namely the indicator
panels, have been saved by the Monash Museum of Computing History.
They also retrieved the VAX 11/780 that was there too, and it is now
in storage.