DO NOT THINK I CAN MAKE THE AOL MAIL FILTER THAT WAY..
In a message dated 11/17/2015 6:06:50 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
woyciesjes at sbcglobal.net writes:
On 11/17/2015 10:54 AM, ethan at 757.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> By any chance could someone configure the mailing list to add
> [cctalk] or [cc] or [cct] into the beginning of the subject line? Not
> looking to filter, just not looking to delete messages.
>
>
This has been discussed _too_ many times... Please don't bring it up
again....
Just setup a filter to shuffle CC stuff to it's own folder, then nuke
it from there...
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--- CompTIA A+ Certified IT Tech -http://certification.comptia.org/
--- HDI Certified Support Center Analyst -http://www.ThinkHDI.com/
Registered Linux user number 464583
"Computers have lots of memory but no imagination."
"The problem with troubleshooting is that trouble shoots back."
- from some guy on the internet.
COMBINE THEM THEN JUST ADD TWO LETTERS AND A DASH AS THUS
CC-
In a message dated 11/17/2015 1:41:03 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwest at classiccmp.org writes:
Ah, one of the top ten topics that keeps resurfacing periodically.
I initially suggested adding the list name to the subject, and the strong
sentiment from the group was not to add it.
The pros and cons seem to be a bit of a religious war. And from time to
time
someone (re)suggests this and the war rages again for a while ;)
Yes, the two lists will be rejoined as one list. I haven't found a
roundtuit
yet.
J
The front panel I needed to check the layout has arrived or at least got
as far as the postal depot at Reading.
There is some customs duty on it. So I'll be there at 07:00 when they
open in the morning.
I'll check the measurements and take the artwork over to the screen
printers when I get back.
Rod (Panelman) Smallwood
nope! think my first email program ran on windows 3.1
and... if I start in caps I finish in caps (tired old arthritic
hands) Ed#
In a message dated 11/18/2015 2:33:45 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cc at informatik.uni-stuttgart.de writes:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
> COMBINE THEM THEN JUST ADD TWO LETTERS AND A DASH AS THUS
> CC-
SOMEONE SUGGESTING THIS AND USING CAPITALS ONLY PROVES TO BE A MAIL NOOB
;-)
Christian
Hi all --
Picked up a Honeywell H316 mini off eBay a couple of weeks back and it's
in need of a power supply (it's completely missing). Given that it's a
long shot that anyone has one rotting away somewhere, I've been planning
on retrofitting something modern, but I figured I'd check here before I
got too far into that *just* in case.
Thanks as always,
Josh
I've encountered a new challenge with the CRC now, it's from the data
blocks written by the Kennedy 6450/6455 Tape Drive.
The below message is to the creator of CRC_RevEng about this topic, but
since several here have been so helpful to me on understanding CRCs (and
Chuck, you referred me to CRC_RevEng), I thought I would put this out to
this group as well.
Again, I really appreciate the feedback!
Thanks,
-AJ
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Convergent MightyFrame <
mightyframect at gmail.com> wrote:
> Greg,
>
> I am extremely impressed by the CRC_RevEng program you wrote. It is quite
> amazing. I have a unique problem using it, and I was hoping you could help.
>
> Instead of trying to articulate all of the complexities in an email, I
> recorded a YouTube video explaining my dilemma and demonstrating the
> result. Please watch that here:
>
> https://youtu.be/nH-tfbvXYrI
>
> Please forgive me if I ramble on in the video, but I hope it effectively
> describes the problem, and how I arrived at it.
>
> The web pages I reference in the video is my own, at:
>
> http://microtechm1.blogspot.com/2015/09/kennedy-6450-tape-drive-data-format…
> and
>
> http://mightyframe.blogspot.com/2015/08/qic-24-tape-data-block-format-decod…
>
> The long-data-block files I use as demonstration in the video are attached.
>
> I would be very appreciative if you could point me toward any available
> work-arounds to this issue.
>
> --
> Thanks!
> -AJ Palmgren
> 515.460.6393
> http://MightyFrame.com
> http://MicrotechM1.blogspot.com
>
>
--
Thanks,
-AJ
http://MicrotechM1.blogspot.com
not really.... even using other email programs I like having [Name] in
start of subj.
hey I am an old fart too over 60!
Ed#
In a message dated 11/17/2015 6:53:38 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
cisin at xenosoft.com writes:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
> DO NOT THINK I CAN MAKE THE AOL MAIL FILTER THAT WAY..
Wow!
There are few people with the inclination to ask a list
full of old farts to make changes for AOL compatability!
ED# IS KF7RWW AT SMECC
In a message dated 11/17/2015 4:22:54 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
kylevowen at gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:30 PM, geneb <geneb at deltasoft.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Ian Finder wrote:
>
> Ian S. King wrote: "... -- K7PDP"
>>>
>>
>> Show-off ;)
>>
>> I'll see that K7PDP and raise you an N7MOS. :D
W4GNU here...yeah, not as cool, I know. :)
73,
Kyle
it cant! the ham can move and keep the old call so all bets for
location are off! ----Ed#
In a message dated 11/16/2015 9:23:06 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
kurtk7 at visi.com writes:
We did get a location and a good thread conversation.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Adrian Stoness <tdk.knight at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> now ur mocking us none radio peeps
> i should go take my cert i do tower work allot installing equipment would
> prolly help me with my job....infact today i installed 3 120degree
sectors
> lol
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:17 PM, js at cimmeri.com <js at cimmeri.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> . . / . - - - . . - . . .
>>
>>
>>> On 11/16/2015 9:00 PM, drlegendre . wrote:
>>>
>>> Guess you'll have to forgive those of us in the "Classicmp enthusiast"
>>> group that don't overlap into the "HAM operator" group.
>>>
>>> I for one had no idea that a member's location could be pinned-down (to
>>> within shipping zones?) using a HAM callsign. Not all of us share the
same
>>> areas of interest and / or levels of knowledge.
>>>
>>> Don't make so many assumptions.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:34 PM, wulfman<wulfman at wulfman.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> With SDR one and the same these days.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/16/2015 5:07 PM, ben wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/16/2015 4:57 PM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only other ham radio operators tend to recognize ham radio
callsigns
>>>>>> and know how to look them up.
>