Now there's a suggestion that has my attention. I have thought
about this before, but I have no FPGA experience at all, and wouldn't
know how to start. If it's just a matter of taking a a core model,
setting it up for the target device (assign pins etc.), and writing it,
I'm sure I could cope with that. But I suspect I'm simplifying things
greatly there. It'd also depend on whether a 6809 model would make it
obvious how to get at the LIC and TSC signals. Maybe there's someone on
this list who I can pester with questions?
On 2/07/2014 3:19 p.m.,
David Riley wrote:
> My advice, faced with a dwindling supply of pulls
(you
> used to be able to buy 'em by the bushel from Jameco)
> is to
consider making a drop-in replacement using
> one of the many
VHDL/Verilog models now available and
> a cheap, tiny FPGA like the MAX
II (which Altera likes to
> call a CPLD, even though it really isn't)
mounted on a
> DIP carrier board.
>
> I wonder if there's a market in
that for the arcade community...
>
> - Dave
Does anybody have a source or replacement for LA120 DECwriter III ribbons?
I've actually got about 8 "new old stock" ones, still shrink wrapped, but
all that I've tried are pretty much dried out despite the shrink wrap. They
barely make a mark on the paper, even with the little print impression lever
cranked all the way up.
Thanks,
Bob
I don't think the requirement is there yet. 68B09Es are still
available; they're getting a bit more expensive, but you can still pick
them up for under $10 without too much trouble. They don't fail that
often either, failures usually seem to be in the RAM, 6821s, sockets
etc. When you say 'use a small FPGA development board', do you mean to
emulate the entire controller board, or just the CPU? Just curious what
you had in mind.
On 2/07/2014 3:41 p.m., ben wrote:
> I thought the
arcade market would use a small FPGA development board.
> Note small is
relative here.
Yep, I'm hoping that I might get away with a few adjustments on the
clock side of things. It all depends on those signals that aren't
brought out on the 6809. Will find out, hopefully tonight.
On 2/07/2014
3:04 p.m., Brian L. Stuart wrote:
> Without seeing the full design, I
can't really say. However, I
> encountered the whole issue when doing a
6809 SBC and did
> end up converting what I had originally designed for
6809Es to
> 6809. I did the second rev of the board with jumpers so you
could
> use either one. If none of the rest of the machine uses any of
>
the processor signals that are unique to the E part, then making
> the
changes to use a 6809 aren't too major. How feasable it is
> in practice
really depends on the rest of the design.
>
> BLS
A nice simple explanation - thanks! So 34 and 35 are effectively
output on the 6809, and input on the 6809E. No problem there, but it
looks like LIC and TSC (38 and 39) not being available on the 6809 would
be an issue. I might take a look over a few designs (Williams WPC, Data
East audio processor, Williams audio processor) and see if they make use
of those. I expect they do...
On 2/07/2014 2:56 p.m., Eric Smith
wrote:
> The 68x09 (no E suffix) has an internal crystal oscillator
circuit (pins 38 and 39) and generates the required quadrature clock (E
and Q, pins 34 and 35). The 68x09E requires an external quadrature clock
input (E and Q, pins 34 and 35), and uses pins 38 and 39 for other
functions (LIC and TSC, respectively).
> From: healyzh at aracnet.com
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Cc:
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:39:35 -0700
> Subject: 9-Track Tape Questions
> Asking for a friend...
>
> Is it possible to still get new BOT markers? If so, does anyone know a
> source? Can markers from Audio tapes be used?
>
> Also, does anyone have a list of common error codes from 9-Track tape drives?
>
> Zane
I bought a roll of audio ones here:
http://usrecordingmedia.com/netmerefoset.html
They work find on the 7-track TU20 at the RICM.
--
Michael Thompson
Hi Everyone,
I know this is slightly off topic, but I'm wondering if anyone knows of,
or is a member of, any mailing lists that are related to computer games,
preferably older, but with the same quality as this list.
Thanks for your time and happy hacking.
- Josh
This message has been forwarded from Usenet. To reply to the
original author, use the email address from the forwarded message.
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Groups: comp.sys.cdc
From: mmccrossen at arletak8.net
Subject: Re: Chippewa Labs Rollcall, June-December 1964
Re: <3cc1ca19_2 at news.iglou.com>
Id: <f5640b38-afa0-42a6-a760-e121353fbd61 at googlegroups.com>
========
My dad, Garner McCrossen was the main FORTRAN programmer from what I've been to
ld (other than Seymour). I had lunch with Les Davis, Edna Bunn, and Verene Cray
last year (2013) and Les is a gold mine of early Cray history.
Please do not use the email address above. pdxmelinda @ comcast.net is best.
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:41:45 +1200
> From: Terry Stewart <terry at webweavers.co.nz>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
>>You said that the computer was promoted by the "late" Bill Cosby.
>>That must be news to him, as he is very much alive. (
>
> Yea. LOL. I actually meant "late-70's comedy icon" but it can be
> interpreted as "the late 1970s icon...". You can't see the hyphen in
> audio. Someone pointed this out when the video first went up. If you run
> that part of the video now, you'll see I've got an annotation in the top
> right hand pointing out what I meant!
I almost made the same mistake in understanding you, but since I knew
he was still alive, I thought for a second and realized that you were
using the (hidden) hyphen.
>
>>There was absolutely no way to actually get into the innards of the
>>machine as the BASIC had no peek or poke commands.
>
> Indeed. This is what confused me about the sprites. I confused "no user
> generated sprites" (under standard BASIC) with no sprites at all. I
> corrected this mistake via annotation in the video too. However I
> understand Peeks and Pokes were available via the Extended BASIC cartridge.
>
> I didn't now about the heating problem. Interesting.
>
> Terry (Tez)
Bill was pretty popular in the mid-to-late '60s too. I remember
listening to a friend's parent's Bill Cosby LP with the "chocolate
cake for breakfast" routine on it back then. It's still funny today,
like pretty much all of his stuff which didn't require crudity or
profanity to attract audiences. I'm not against crudity/profanity in
general, but some so-called "entertainers" go a bit too far I think,
trying to out-cuss each other.
To get back on topic, I've got two (or one and a half TI-99/4As,
depending on how you count the parts machine). Now I'll have to dig
them out and try to program/play with them using the TV set I saved
for the C-64 I've got. I've got one other (physically) smaller
machine, maybe a Sinclair or similar that requires a TV set as a
display.
Everything else either required a "real" terminal (PDP-8 "Family",
PDP-11 [Q-Bus machines], VAX-4000/200 [I think]) or came with a
"CRT/monitor" of one type or another (B/W, Apple III display, CGA,
VGA, etc.).
<I'll duck now in case I've mistakenly misused any religious
terminology in the sentence above.>
Bob