A while ago, somebody put an SGI IRIS 2020 out
on the loading dock of the computer science building at
work, where they often put things they think somebody
might want to tinker with. I dragged it over to my building
and plugged it in, and the console monitor came up.
That machine had almost a Unix shell as the console monitor,
you could read files off the disk and such.
Well, I took it home and after consulting with some
people online who know the model, it was determined that
the geometry engine was bad. I found a guy in Germany
who had all the boards and shipped them to me for a
couple hundred Dollars. I plugged the GE board in, and
it booted IRIX. I got the guy who wrote the SGI flight
sim demo to send me the source code, compiled it, and
it worked. (He has asked me not to name him, as that
program is under SGI copyright.) It had a quirk due
to using the GE's matrix
transforms to do ALL 3D arithmetic, including the
"flight dynamics". It would get "stuck" at the 4 main
compass points. I never figured out how to recode
that to use standard C arithmetic. It was a cool toy,
but then 3DFX and similar PC graphics boards came
out and Flight Gear was created. The replacement
GE board eventually also failed, and although I had
plenty of chips to swap to repair it, I didn't have the
diags to find out which one was bad. I eventually sold
all the boards to a broker to use for repairs. Apparently
the Air Force still uses them, I'm guessing maybe for
flight simulators.
Jon
>>>> You never forget your first UNIX.
I think it was actually NeXTStep 1.0. A smidgen of TOPS-10
early, some punch-cards on a Cyber ???, a lot of RSX-11M, smidigin of
CP/M, lots of TRS-DOS and then Mac OS, some HP-DOS, a smidgin of
MVS/VM, possibly just a login onto a Sun workstation, but I really
settled in and worked Unix (to run Mathematica, mostly) on the NeXT
or on my serial connection to it via my DEC Rainbow.
I'm discounting my "use" of the mail server functionality,
since about all I ever saw was the mail client, but SunOS/mail may
predate the NeXTStep.
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
I've searched in all the usual spots and haven't been able to find a
CMD CQD-240/243 manual. It is a Qbus controller with both single-ended
and differential SCSI capability.
It looks similar to the CMD CQD-220 (manual on bitsavers) and the CMD
CQD-720 (manual on bitsavers) - but has a different switch
configuration with more options.
Regards,
Lyle
--
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
The 8086 versions of the Model 25 and Model 30 have 8-bit ISA risers, the
25 with a two-slot riser and the 30 with a three-slot riser.
The 80286 versions of each have 16-bit ISA risers, again the Model 25 with
two slots and the Model 30 with three.
I tried plugging the 8-bit riser into the Model 30 286 board, but the
system refused to power up. In addition, the Model 30 riser is incorrectly
spaced to fit in the Model 25 all-in-one case. Even if I cut the top slot
off, the remaining two don't line up at all. It looks like I need the
genuine part, which no one seems to have anywhere.
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 17:44:34 +0100
> From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: Anyone have a IBM Model 25-286 Riser card?
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAMTenCHuWaAxtnBSujB7v1e6aGUhWBSco-quVRoXBCPLD+8eQA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> On 10 May 2013 22:37, Terry Stewart <terry at webweavers.co.nz> wrote:
> >>Besides, the 16-bit PS/2s are 16-bit MCA, not 16-bit ISA.
> >
> >>Peace... Sridhar
> >
> > Not all of them. My IBM PS/2 30-286 is is ISA-based.
>
> That's sort of what we're debating here. Are the ISA-based PS/2s 8-bit
> or 16-bit? IOW short or longer, 2-part ISA slots?
>
> You could resolve the question - which does yours have?
>
> --
> Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
> Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
> MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
> Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
>
I have a unisys 9246 line printer
that uses a format punched paper tape and don't have the tape.
the printer will work with out it.
the manual did mention a punch and gave a few generic punch model numbers
so one could purchase one..
Bill
Folks,
Spotted this on E-Bay UK. Now I am sure I must have worked with
printers that used a format tape, but I don't remember a punch...
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/190837106811
Dave
G4UGM
Hello All,
I a new subscriber from just a few days ago, and I have spent more hours
than I care to admit to going through all of the emails in the online
archives.
In past lives, I spent a lot of time with OS/2, and even though I don't
spend as much time as I used to with it, OS/2 comments still catch my
attention.
Anyway, to get to the point, I caught this thread (bottom) from 2008
which generated a bunch of comments.
The thread was briefly revived in early 2009.
If there was ever a final fall out from the thread, I somehow missed it.
Was there a version of OS/2 for CPU's other than X86 or PPC?
What was ultimately found to be on the tape?
Thank you,
Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, you read that correctly.
I have in my possession a TK-50 tape for the PDP-11 system which
contains none other than
OS/2 operating system.
Many people have claimed this never existed. But I have the tape!
I had done a directory dump of it and can supply it.
One other person who's checked the directory listing has said it is
authentic.
I'm not sure what to do with it, and I believe IBM made OS/2 open
source, so technically it should be "free"
of it's chains
maybe someone can turn it into something useful, or just run it and have
the most unique PDP on the planet, I don't know... whatever :)
anyhow, it's a really weird bit of computing history, and I'd hate for
it to be lost. it should be in a museum :)