Does anybody have a Visual 1050 with hard drive setup? I am looking for any doc/pointers on how to get a hard drive configured under CP/M for this system.
Thanks.
>> CdS cells have quite a few problems that have made them obsolete for
>
> I don;t disagree that there are other devices that have advantages in
> many applciaitons, and it's entirely reasonable to then use said
> other
> devices. But thee CdS photoresisto also has an advantage -- it's a
> resistor. At a constnat ligjht level, the I-V characteristic is
> pretty
> darn lienar. That makes it ideal for the sort of amplitude-control
> application that we've been discussisng
>
Indeed. They are probably perfectly good for photometric applications
too, where it doesn't matter if it takes some time for the cell to
adjust to the illumination.
And as far as environmental issues are concerned, it would certainly be
much better to get rid of CFLs. There has actually been some coverage in
the news here about CFLs being thrown in glass recycling containers
instead of being handed in as toxic waste (there are reasonably easily
accessible places that accept toxic waste everyhere here as well, but
nowhere near as many or as accessible as glass recycling containers) and
causing problems at the recycling plants. LED lighting is being promoted
instead. So far, there has been no discussion about environmental issues
with semiconductor manufacturing...
/Jonas
I founded CMC in 1968 assuming we're talking of the same Los Angeles based
firm. If you want any information about it, contact me and I'll try to fill
you in.
Jim Sweeney
Law Offices of James K. Sweeney
2001 Wilshire Blvd.; Ste. 200
Santa Monica CA 90403
Tel: 310-477-0272
Fax: 310-496-0122
e-mail: jks at jksq.com
website: www.jksq.com
Macintosh Revealed - Programming with the Toolbox (Chernicoff) - Vol 2 -
Apple Press/Hayden
THINK C Object-Oriented Programming Manual - 1991
THINK C Standard Libraries Reference - 1991
THINK Reference - User Manual - 1991
THINK Reference - User Manual - v2.0 - 1992
THINK C User Manual - 1991
LAN WorkPlace for Macintosh User's Guide - First Edition - Oct 1992
HyperTalk Programming (Daniel G. Shafer) "includes Version 1.1" - Hayden
Books - 1988
Symantec C++ Compiler Guide v 6 - 1993
THINK C for Macintosh (THINK Class Library Guide) - v 6 1993
Symantec Think C for Macintosh User's Guide - v 6 1993
Symantec C++ For Macintosh (Compiler Guide) - v 7 1994
Symantec C++ for Macintosh (Visual Architect & THINK Class Library
Guide) - v 7 1994
Symantec THINK C for Macintosh (User's Guide) - 1994
Steven Levy, Insanely Great: "The Life And Times of Macintosh, The
Computer that Changed Everything" - with stamp "Publication/Embargo
Date, 1 May 1995, Penguin Books Australia Ltd."
Learning Cocoa (O'Reilly) - May 2001 First Edition
Using the Macintosh Toolbox with C - Takatsuka/Huxham/Burnard - Sybex 1986
While these are in Melbourne, Australia, if paid by PayPal I can ship
anywhere, advise country/city/postal code/zip, and whether surface
(60-90 days) or air, but please let me know ASAP. I can't ship anything
after about Tuesday 6th Dec.
--T
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:52:03 +0100
From: Holm Tiffe <holm at freibergnet.de>
MikeS wrote:
> ---- Original message:
> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:13:38 +0100
> From: Holm Tiffe <holm at freibergnet.de>
>
> > >Files should have an header wich describes what type of data the file
> > >represents.
>
> > Why?
>
> > What is so terribly wrong with using the file's _name_ to describe the
> > type
> > of data a file represents, so that those "humans" that you seem to
> > disdain
> > elsewhere can also know and work with its type, not just the computer?
> You ask me what's wrong? Never heard of a file called "your_win.jpg.exe"
> for example and was most Windoze users are doning with such a file and how
> its name is displayed on most windoze machines?
I'm not a UNIX expert so I must have misunderstood; you mean UNIX cares
about file extensions after all and I can't name a UNIX executable
"your_win.jpg" ?
At least the modern DOS equivalent (which is what we're talking about,
remember?) *does* show the all-important .EXE in the file name, as will
Windows if you've enabled it. How does UNIX warn me at a quick glance?
...
<Half a dozen paragraphs of the traditional redundant and totally irrelevant
Microsoft-bashing drivel removed for readability>
...
> > BTW, I think this quote from Ritchie himself sums it up perfectly:
> > "Unix is simple. It just takes a genius to understand its simplicity."
>
> > m
> Hmm, wasn't it "Unix IS user friendly, but it is a little restrictive what
> his friends are.."
Look it up! I think you'll find dozens of references, as well as to your
quote, e.g.
http://inagist.com/CodeWisdom/146592721312817153/
or
http://quotes.prolix.nu/Technology/Computers/
> PS:
> Sorry for my broken english, never learned it in a shool or so, it's
> entirely from using unixoid OS's and communicateing with people like you
> over the net.
> Proably it's still better as your german :-)
I doubt it; born and raised in Hamburg my German's actually pretty good.
m
On 12/14/2011 08:29 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
> I've "field repaired" at least five units in this way, giving them a
> happy rebirth - The rest of the monitor lasts a lot longer than the
> stupid capacitors do. Building in obsolescence like this should be a
> crime that puts people behind bars.
If they had successfully built in obsolescence, then all the parts would fail at the same time.
The US big 3 automakers to their credit did a pretty good job with this for a long time. Yeah, cars in crashes still had good parts to pick over in a junkyard, but by the end of a cars natural life there really wasn't an awful lot left to pick over.
Not that I'd wish a 1974 Dodge Monaco on just anyone :-)
Tim.
I just saw your message about CMC which was the company I founded in 1968.
I had no idea people other than I ever thought about it anymore. I can help
with information with anyone who is interested.
Jim Sweeney
Law Offices of James K. Sweeney
2001 Wilshire Blvd.; Ste. 200
Santa Monica CA 90403
Tel: 310-477-0272
Fax: 310-496-0122
e-mail: jks at jksq.com
website: www.jksq.com
I've got a Sharp YO-470 here that worked last time it had batteries in it.
Free to a good home; if you live outside the US I'll ask that you pay
shipping. Please reply off list.
Alexey
From: John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com>
To: <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Cheap Chinese electrolytics - a plague - Re: TV -> D-Sub
converter possible?
Message-ID: <201112171752.pBHHptS8082368 at billy.ezwind.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
..."When it first started
happening, I heard the excuse it was a case of industrial espionage
gone wrong where an ingredient was left out of the recipe..."
at the time I heard 3 guys from the factory got together and stole 3 parts of
the formula from a tiawanese factory and defected to mainland china for a $1M
bounty. But they didn't know of a 4th part; the corrosion inhibitor. Without
the 4th part the caps were supposed to little time bombs, slowly eating away at
their aluminum cases. I do know I woke up one night after having a dream of
popcorn popping only to find a ATX p/s with caps going off like popcorn in the
room next door. I unplugged the PC and put it in the bath tub and went back to
sleep. Changed out the p/s the next day and it worked fine.
________________________________
>> > It may be, but CdS cells abound, and I don't see them going away
>> > anytime soon. There's so little cadmium in them that I really don't see
>> > it ever being a problem.
> You and I know it's not a problem,. but that is hargly going to satisfy
> the non-scientific idiots we have in charge. I beleive that all CdS LDRs
> are not RoHS compliant ;-(. This doesn;'t affect home constructios (at
> least not in the UK), it does matter if you're going to use them commerially.
CdS cells have quite a few problems that have made them obsolete for
photographic purposes: temperature dependence, slow response and memory
effect. They need a significant time to adjust to a different level of
illumination to give a normal response. The response becoming non-linear
with age has also been reported. For a long time cameras have been using
silicon photodiodes instead.
As an example of the memory effect, the manual for a Durst darkroom
exposure meter, which I have just been given and which uses a CdS cell,
says to illuminate the CdS cell immediately beneath the lens of the
enlarger for 15-20 seconds before making a measurement.
They do work well all the same, most of my cameras that actually have an
exposure meter use CdS cells. And they seem to be easily available.
/Jonas