test-drb January 2011

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

130 participants
209 discussions

by tshoppa＠wmata.com

? There are no Teletypes that use Baudot code. They use a US variant of ? the ITA2 five-level code. ? Baudot code was only used until about 1901. Murray code was used until ? the 1930s. Everything after that used ITA2. That's a little like saying nobody actually uses ASCII since 1968, we're all really Using ANSI_X3.4-1968 or later. Technically true but not common usage. Everyone in the past half century has called a Model 28 TTY a Baudot Teletype when They had to distinguish it from any other type. (Baudot is still the default for Several applications so you don't even have to say it's Baudot.) I suppose classiccmp naturally attracts folks who care about such things (witness The thread I started over a few years ago when I noted that bitsavers had surpassed 100 GBytes and everyone informed me that no, a Gbyte was 1073741824 bytes so I was wrong.) Tim.

13 years, 11 months

When was the MicroVAX 3100 Model 95 Introduced?

by robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com

I have found two conflicting sources for when this machine was introduced. According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroVAX) it was April 1994. The source of this information appears to be this article: http://www.cbronline.com/archive/?SearchTerms=MicroVAX+3100+95 However, the following HP article http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvms/20th/vmsbook.pdf on p60 (bottom right) suggests it is September 1992. Both sources would appear to be pretty reliable, but they can't both be right. Does anyone have any suggestion how I might determine which is the more accurate? Regards Rob

13 years, 11 months

Disc drive READY output -- any standards?

by classiccmp＠philpem.me.uk

Hi guys, Is there a defined standard as to when the READY output on a Shugart-type disc drive should go active? I'm (slowly!) working through the rebuild of one of the Amstrad drives (an EME231 I know to have working mechanical components, potentially good heads, and a fried control board), and I'm stuck on deciding how to deal with the READY output. My initial thought was to hold it inactive until a few INDEX pulses have passed, and the motor speed was within 5% of 'ideal' speed. The plan was to use a 32kHz oscillator and a 4040 counter to get a several-Hz signal, then rig up some logic to check that the disc speed was OK, and after a few valid index cycles enable the drive. Then I started wondering... am I over-engineering this? Would waiting for a couple of full disc rotations be enough to reliably generate a READY signal? Irony is that the read-amp will probably be the easiest part of the whole system... I've got a Motorola appnote which basically says "if you're using a data rate of X and a rotation speed of Y, these parameters will work" -- X and Y being the two parameters the Amstrad drive uses... That just leaves the write amp and erase logic to design (and maybe a 'write lockout' jumper). Thanks, -- Phil. classiccmp at philpem.me.uk http://www.philpem.me.uk/

13 years, 11 months

Character set pedanticness (was Re: Teletype)

by tshoppa＠wmata.com

Eric wrote: >>> There are no Teletypes that use Baudot code. They use a US variant of >>> the ITA2 five-level code. >>> Baudot code was only used until about 1901. Murray code was used until >>> the 1930s. Everything after that used ITA2. Tim wrote: >> That's a little like saying nobody actually uses ASCII since 1968, we're all really >> Using ANSI_X3.4-1968 or later. Technically true but not common usage. Eric wrote: > No, it's not much like that at all. Baudot code used significantly > different character encodings than ITA2, such that a Baudot device and > an ITA2 device will not interoperate in any meaningful fashion. > ASCII-63, ASCII-67, ASCII-68, and ANSI X3.4 have only minor variations > and will generally interoperate reasonably well. I'm not disagreeing that the academically correct term is ITA #2. (Interestingly most web page hits today call it "ITA 2" or "ITA2" but the 70's and earlier books call it "ITA #2" when they are being pedantic.) I'm just saying that in its Heyday, if you had to distinguish a 5-level TTY from a 7-level TTY, the working terms were Baudot and ASCII. Although technically incorrect. Sort of like when I know the people who used and maintained what they called a 11/74, and then I see folks here telling me that no, it's really A 11/70MP :-). Yeah, in a certain aspect that may be what the paperwork called it. But really everybody called it the 11/74. When I'm told that the academically correct word for something, is different than what everyone actually called it at the time, and I see Wikipedia etc. going for academically correct rather than "actual working term", it sometimes feels like history that I lived is being redefined underneath me by some sort of pedantic streak. Another recent example of a different character set being redefined underneath Me: On Wikipedia, the morse code for -...- is defined as "double dash" with a Possible keyboard equivalent of "equals sign", something I never heard till recently. I called it "BT" with a bar Over top for most of half a century now. I don't doubt that some CCITT standard Called it double dash in the past, just that me and the guys I know who use Morse every day, never called it that. This isn't new to me. I remember getting involved in altmode vs escape key arguments In the distant past. I always called it altmode, what right does anyone else Have to call it escape? :-))))). Big smileys, because I discovered that three Different ASCII codes (0174, 0175 and 033) were being used and I didn't know until Much much later. Tim.

13 years, 11 months

Disc drive READY output -- any standards?

by CCTECH＠beyondthepale.ie

> >My initial thought was to hold it inactive until a few INDEX pulses have >passed, and the motor speed was within 5% of 'ideal' speed. The plan was >to use a 32kHz oscillator and a 4040 counter to get a several-Hz signal, >then rig up some logic to check that the disc speed was OK, and after a >few valid index cycles enable the drive. > The BBC Micro internally generates the ready signal for the 8271 controller >from index, drive select and the 8MHz clock using a 74LS393, 4020 and 4013. I figured out how the circuit works once and my head still hurts. As far as I remember, it works like your description above and if an index pulse is a few percent later than expected, it deasserts ready. This was designed for 5.25in floppies and worked fine with early 3.5in drives. However a problem arose with more recent 3.5in drives. It seems that instead of requiring a particular time between step pulses, these drives allow the controller to step as fast as it likes and they signal the controller that the heads have not yet reached the required location by suppressing index until they do. The circuitry in the BBC notices the lack of index and drops the ready signal to the 8271 resulting in a "drive not ready" error when stepping by more than a couple of tracks (er, I mean cylinders) when using one of these drives. It seems the lessons are firstly that the designers of the BBC micro did not reckon they could rely on getting a good ready signal from the drive and secondly, no matter how you try to be clever, something will later come along to mess up your cunning plan. Regards, Peter Coghlan.

13 years, 11 months

Flakey Multia

by mark.kahrs＠gmail.com

Actually, the Rayovac 840 is rated at 4.5v 800 mAh, so putting in 3*AAA is a reasonable (and "cost effective") thing to do. But the footprint is a tad larger. There's room... The NetBSD pages specifically mention a FCT623 as the cause of problems but I didn't want to get into that mess unless I had to... A Linux FAQ claimed that changing the video or serial cables could also cause problems.

13 years, 11 months

Teletype Tales Part 3

by evan＠snarc.net

> The big minor thing is the back panel to the stand. It's missing Bill, we have several *SR-33 "parts" machines; I'll mail you a back panel for the stand. Send me your address in a private message.

13 years, 11 months

Character set pedanticness (was Re: Teletype)

by tshoppa＠wmata.com

Brent wrote: > Some minor changes were made to the Murray encodings and it became the > ITA #2, but referring to it as Baudot code continued for general > reference. In other words (like so many other things), both terms would > seem reasonable or 'correct' depending on the perspective one is coming > from. I will note that from an academic/historic standpoint that MacKenzie's _Coded Character Sets: History and Development_ calls it CCITT #2 and I don't think he uses the word Baudot at all. But I also feel that MacKenzie's book is written almost entirely from a standards-committee mindset. There's occasional mention of "real world usage after the character set was standardized" but it's brief. Tim.

13 years, 11 months

Teletype Tales Part 3

by tshoppa＠wmata.com

> I remember my first computer experiences were in terminal rooms full of > teletypes. You realised just how noisy they were when the machine (a > DECSYSTEM-20) went down and all the terminals stopped at once. I would love > to get hold of an ASR33 but they seem pretty rare these days. Don't forget THE SMELL of a room of working model 33's. I'm not sure exactly what the smell was - probably a mix of ozone from the motors, warm oil on the mechanical parts, and some of the smell of oiled paper tape - but that was part of the experience too :-) Oiled paper tape could actually go rancid under some conditions (that I'm unclear about today!). I wonder if that's one of the smells I remember. In particular the smell from the hoppers that Caught the holes punched from the tape as being not the typical Teletype smell but something stronger and more offensive. The hoppers Were not necessarily emptied daily :-) Tim.

13 years, 11 months

Video's of inside of Compuserve?

by CCTECH＠beyondthepale.ie

> >> The datacenter was always at 62 degree's, after working 4-5 hours in >> there, your knuckles started to stiffen up and you'd feel the cold from >> the floor come up into your shins... ah.... good times, good times :-) I >> loved the quietness, all you heard was the sounds of fans whirling away, >> it was a deafening kind of quiet background noise, I miss that. > > It really is a good feeling. Only true geeks seem to appreciate it, >though. > My last boss, who was from the sales end of the organisation occasionally had to help me move stuff in our data centre. He didn't mind the heavy lifting but he really hated being in the place. It didn't bother me at all, especially if the office was hot and sticky. What I miss is from 20 years ago, in a different place, the 400Hz drone of power supplies in equipment connected to a motor-generator set. Never mind the video - does anyone have a sound recording of that? Regards, Peter Coghlan.

13 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb January 2011