Recently a friend of mine in Calgary (Canada) fell heir to a 13Kg box
of Solaris manuals. He says that they are still in their original
plastic wrappers and that most of them have "5.1" and "x86" on the
spines. There are a few which appear to relate to Solaris 2.5.1 for
Sparc.
If anyone is interested please get in touch with him directly: rick at hartmantech.com
Bob Bramwell | The birds have vanished into the sky,
| and now the last cloud drains away.
+1 902 531 2289 | We sit together, the mountain and I,
| until only the mountain remains.
| - Li Po, 8th Century Chinese poet
> Finally got round to getting the fan out. It is a 120mm fan, marked as
> follows:
>
> Nidec
> Torin
> TA450DC
> Model A 31728-10
> 10 V.D.C
> 30 AMP
I do not believe for one instant that that fan draws 30A! 0.3A, quite
possibly.
>
> The only readily available DC fans I can find are 12V, guessing these would
I've seen 24V ones, but those are even less use to you.
> run at a reduced speed compared to the ones I have in the machine now, but
> would probably otherwise work OK. What do you reckon? If this would work I
Well, if it was my machine, I'd have a go are repairing the old fan
first. Officially I'd claim that was for originality, practically it's
bacuase I've got more time than money :-).
Seriously, you've got nothing to lose by trying to take it apart and find
the fault. If you can't fix it, you can just fit a new fan anyway.
> might replace them both with quieter fans (not sure what the flow rate of
> these fans is any idea?
>
> The connector is difficult to describe. The fan has two tags that stick out
> and the cable has a plastic block on the end with a socket that fits the two
> tags.
Yes,t that's the standard arrangemetn. The tags can have wires soldered
straight to them, or you cna use faston terminals . Smoe manufcatuters
also sold leads with mouteded connectors that fitted onto the tags on
their fans, as you have here.
-tony
Sometime ago I posted a request for help on my two Compaq Portable IIs that
failed to boot from the FDD.
I now can boot one using an "off the shelf" (at Weird Stuff) half height 360
kB FDD in place of either of the two Canon 5201 1/3 height FDDs that were in
the two Portable IIs. Both exhibit the same failure mode, while trying to
read the disk visibly spins erratically, as if there were some form of
stiction causing it to go slower and then faster. Manually turning it with
and without a disk, the spindle motor feels free of stiction.
It is surprising to me to find both Canon 1/3 height FDDs fail in the same
mode, suggesting a fundamental flaw in the design. For example, the full
height and half heights I used in this project are older than the Canon's,
of unknown provenance, but all 5 have worked flawlessly. Any ideas, other
than avoid old Canon 1/3 height FDs?
Anyone have a working 1/3 height 360 kB Canon FD? (I think I need Canon to
get the bezel right on the machine I am "restoring").
Tom
PS: I bought a package of 20 360 kB FDs off the internet and one of my
problems was that about 1/2 of them were full of defects, causing some of my
problems. I finally solved that problem by throwing away any disk with any
defect found during Format and doing a Diskcomp after each Diskcopy.
http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-January/281973.html
6809 SBC (was Editor religious wars (was Re: Museums))
David Betz dbetz at
<mailto:cctalk%40classiccmp.org?Subject=Re%3A%206809%20SBC%20%28was%20Editor
%20religious%20wars%20%28was%20Re%3A%20Museums%29%29&In-Reply-To=%3C1EA52674
-F26F-4783-9889-80FEBFDC0F0C%40xlisper.com%3E> xlisper.com
Thu Jan 28 12:40:03 CST 2010
* Previous message: Editor
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-January/281971.html> religious
wars (was Re: Museums)
* Next message: 6809
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-January/281975.html> SBC (was
Editor religious wars (was Re: Museums))
* Messages sorted by: [
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-January/date.html#281973> date
] [ <http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-January/thread.html#281973>
thread ] [
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-January/subject.html#281973>
subject ] [
<http://classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2010-January/author.html#281973>
author ]
_____
On Jan 28, 2010, at 1:28 PM, e.stiebler wrote:
> David Betz wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Ben wrote:
>>> It seems only Motorola thought of 'home' computing
>>> more with 6809.
>> I always wanted to program the 6809. I have a SWTPc 6800/6809 system that
I built but I never fleshed it out with a disk drive and OS. Does anyone
make a 6809 SBC that will run OS-9 these days?
>
> I think there is one hiding on :
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/n8vem
I checked this out a while ago but I think it is just a 6809 coprocessor
board that only works with their Z80 board.
>
> Or take a cheap FPGA kit, there is the system09, which runs a lot of
software in the meantime
Thanks for the suggestion but I was hoping for something actually had a 6809
chip on it.
_____
size=2 width="100%" align=center>
The N8VEM 6809 host processor by itself is dependent on the ECB SBC for its
IO. However, I recently released an "IO mezzanine" PCB that connects on top
of the 6809 host processor board that allows it to be operated independently
with its own power interface, serial port, timer, and dual VIAs for IO.
One of the N8VEM builders ported CUBIX to the 6809 host processor and I am
using ASSIST09 on the 6809 host processor with IO mezzanine as a stand alone
computer. It definitely uses a real 6809 CPU.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
Hi
I'm looking for a SBUS cg3 card, the later models which
were 501-1718 or 501-1909. I have a new monitor which will
only sync to 1152x900x76 not 1152x900x66 the card I have
(of course). Its for a sparcstation 1+.
For some reason the cg3 is the only card I could ever get
working with the sparcstation 1+. Later TGX cards, etc
wouldnt work.
Anyone have a spare? I'm in the UK, but for something this
size shouldnt be too much to post.
Thanks
Ian.
Hello. I shall receive in a short one PDP8E in working state. It was used
with one paper tape reader years ago. With independence of the revision of
the machine that I shall do, I should like to locate some peripherals to
interact with the computer. I was thinking in one Teletype with paper tape
reader-punch, or both, one cathode-ray terminal or typewriter terminal and
one paper tape reader-punch... I have one VT220 operative that perhaps could
use with the appropiate cable, with I'm not sure about this.
What I have is one offer for one modern storage device for the PDP8E of
solid state kind or similar. It's expensive and I must think about it
seriously.
I should agree any comment and offer related with this matter. Better for
free :-)
Regards
Sergio
This is a long shot... On the other hand, there are people here who've
done all sorts of odd things, and the only silly question is one that's
not asked (or something like that).
As I mentioned yesterday (when I asked about zneer diode data), I've got
an HP2631B printer that's gone crazy. I had anohter quick look at it
today, and it appears that one problem is the shaft encoder on the right
hand end of the carriage leadscrew. This connects by a 10 way cable
(integral with the encoder) to the 'printer logic' PCB, 6 of the pins on
the connector sseem to be used, 2 grouds, 2 +5V and the 2 quadrature
output signals. Those 2 outputs are buffered by a couple of sections of a
'14, the outputs of that go to testpoints (and elswehere, of course).
Anyway, both those testpoints are low all the time (turning the leadscrew
by hand, I've not fixed the motor drive amplifer yet!). The outputs from
the encoder are high all the time (so the problem isn't the '14, more's
the pity), they are genuinely high, not floating. And there don't seem to
be any pull-ups on the printer logic PCB< so the 'high' is coming from
the encoder.
Anyway. Iv'e read the HP service manual (on http://www.hpmuseum.net) and
it appears you need special tools to remove and replace the encoder. The
encoder disk is epoxied to the neadscrew, you need a special puller to
break the bond and an alignment tool to get the encoder disk the right
distance insde the encoder housing when you refit it.
Of coruse I don;t ahve the tools...
Has anyone ever done this? Maybe the same tools, or something like them,
were used with THe shaft encoders that HP sold as loose componets. Any
thoughts?
-tony
I've looked into this a bit.
As noted previously, it is essentially impossible to figure out exact shipments of 8051, as there is no central clearinghouse of licensees, and there are literally dozens of suppliers sticking 8051 IP in all sorts of things. That said, according to the only reasonably well cited analyst report I have (from Emitt Solutions), the 8051 architecture accounted for 19% of the US$4.9 billion 8-bit MPU market in 2007. If you wave your hand and say the average volume price across all 8051 variants is US$0.25 (a number I think is probably high), that's around 40 billion units shipped in 2007.
According the Annual Report for ARM Holdings, Plc., there were shipped 2.6 billion ARM processors for mobile applications and 1.4 billion in other applications from all licenses in 2008. This was up from around 3 billion units in 2007 (in a total market for 32-bit embedded processors of around US$3.8B). Safe to assume it was more than that in 2009. Not sure what that represents as a revenue number, as ARM Holdings revenue numbers are for licensing fees. However, one could guess it's a market of significantly more than US$4b across all licensees in 2008.
By comparison, Freescale did around US$1.88B in microcontroller sales, but that was across all their lines (including the still very popular 68xx/HC lines), so is safe to assume the actual units shipped for PPC is a fraction of ARM numbers. I know there are other PPC licensees, but I don't think they're going to make up that gap.
All analysts agree that the 8-bit market is eroding and the 32-bit world is exploding, from a market share if not revenue perspective.
KJ