It's been a long hard day of moving stuff today, but we made great
progress. We *should* finish tomorrow, I sure hope so. Basically
we have two 19" racks left, a cart, BA123, and a couple little items,
and a bunch of empty boxes.
There have been some nice "finds" as a result of this move. I
learned today I still have my DECstation 5000/133 that I bought to
run NetBSD, that was definitely a highlight of the day since I've
been regretting getting rid of it! :-) I found I still have my
DECserver 200/MC as well, which I also thought was long gone.
I've also learned I have even more DEC spares than I thought I had,
including 1-2 more BA23's than I realized. The really shocking thing
is that it appears I might actually have good access to a majority of
my collection when I'm done with this move. If things work as
planned in setting up the garage, I hope to have a corner with
several different systems I've not had room for in years setup. The
real question will be, when will I ever find the time.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
it doesn't look all that muc like a 5150 probably because it isn't one. Durn looks just like a 5170 to me. I have the 5150 version. Don't know if it's tempest tested or not. Figured it was simply a loosely mil-spec, ruggedized, industrialized version for certain environments. There was a "compatible" CGA monitor (Terry Yager used to have one).
Mine doesn't have a keyboard, so surely utilizing a vanilla k/b will render it "powerless". Or what have you. AAMOF, if anyone wants the thing, w/the rust that has accumulated due to being stored in a something less then sealed outdoor shed, it's their's for shipping. The power switch is also missing. I think the p/s is there though. You could strip it down and repaint it I guess :)
--- On Thu, 6/11/09, Warren Wolfe <lists at databasics.us> wrote:
> From: Warren Wolfe <lists at databasics.us>
> Subject: Re: Interesting IBM 5150... or something
> To: "On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 5:55 PM
> Brian Lanning wrote:
> > I've never heard of this. Looks even more
> tank-like than the 5150.
> > Look at the backplane where the cables go in.
> >
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-IBM-Tempest-Computer-for-Classified-work_W0QQit…
> >
>
> Oh, for Pete's sake, a Tempest terminal, right when we're
> talking about classified info. Just so you know, this
> one is compromised by the insecure monitor (I think - it
> should be MUCH bigger, and not plastic, if Tempest approved)
> and the non-Tempest keyboard. "Tank-like" is a very
> concise description.
>
> I worked for a company that made (CP/M capable) Tempest
> terminals for the Burroughs TD-830 emulation market.
> The government would not tell you what acceptable levels of
> emissions were -- a company had to make a prototype, and
> send it in for testing. A while (gov't time) later,
> thumbs up or thumbs down. It often took many cycles to
> get a good one. Once it was approved, they bought them
> for HUGE prices. Quite a money-maker.
>
>
>
> Warren
>
>
Wow. "I don't read [anything]."
I'm done with this. This is either troll bait or a truly sad psychopathology.
---
Folks, let get on with things. Hey, we just got a restored PDP-8/TC08/TU56 booting OS/8! After calibrating the TC08, I turned off the system to put all the 'skins' back in place, fired it up... and it wouldn't boot After checking the obvious things, I decided to let the system warm up for fifteen minutes or so. Yep, it booted fine.
Something tells me I need to look at the RC components in those one-shots and clock circuits, and probably replace some realllllllllly old capacitors. -- Ian
________________________________________
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Kirn Gill [segin2005 at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:18 PM
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: the arrogance of youth [was RE: UNIX V7]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rich Alderson wrote:
> Simply because you don't hear about an OS in _Linux Journal_ does
> not mean that it's dead, or even ailing.
I don't read _Linux Journal_. Or _BusinessWeek_. Or any magazines.
I occasionally glance at Slashdot if I'm desperate. It's quickly
becoming a reorganizing 'digg' link aggregate.
Otherwise, I just Google for nonsense terms. The news you find that way...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkox1yoACgkQF9H43UytGibF1QCggHyvvhtqRSMJs0TBQ8pftPrR
ReEAnj0b/Xrp1PvkoUdRbRBS6lxPWRvk
=JXAz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Brad Parker <brad at heeltoe.com> wrote:
> Eric Smith wrote:
>> > Brad Parker wrote:
>>> >> I did a "direct decode" pdp-11 in verilog recently just to see how
>>> >> big it would be (and because I was frustrated with the pop-11
>>> >> project). It fits nicely & boots RT11 at 50mhz.
>> > At that speed, surely it hasn't finished booting RT11 yet!
> sorry, I don't get the joke. clock is 50mhz, or 20ns; each state is one
> clock and on average
> an instruction is 3 states. I calculated 10mips. it seems to boot much
> faster than my 11/44 :-)
>
> what did I miss?
That case matters. :-)
m = milli
M = Mega
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
> From: Brent Hilpert <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca>
>
> Roger Holmes wrote:
>>
>> The theory said to change the resonant frequency of my keypunch's
>> ferro-resonant power regulator from 60Hz to 50Hz I should up the 15uF
>> capacitor to 21.6 uF. Well I tried 21.5, and the voltage went up by
>> ONE volt. Hmm, scratch head, at least it went in the right direction.
>> Search around for AC capacitors and find one in a defunct large
>> electric lawnmower. Its 30uF, I think about replacing the 15 with it
>> but if an extra 6.5uF only gained one volt, and I need 6 then it
>> seemed reasonable to combine it and try 45 uF. That gives me 46volts,
>> only 2 volts short. I throw in the 6.5uF too and I get 47 volts. I
>> try
>
> I had a niggling concern about this when the suggestion to change
> the C was
> first profferred.
> I don't have a thorough enough understanding of the ferro-resonant
> principle
> to categorically say what the problem is but I can half-think of a few
> possible issues:
>
> - Because the ferroresonance principle involves the inductor working
> in the core saturation region, the standard resonance equation with
> which you calculated the new C may not be applicable. (I see you got
> the square of f proportion.)
>
> - If the changed LC relationship changes the circulating current
> in the LC circuit then the core magnetic field will also be affected,
> which would upset the rest of the transformer design targets.
>
> - Changing the C changes the resonant frequency in an LC circuit,
> as you desire to accomplish. However, the Q factor of the resonant
> circuit is dependant upon the ratio of L/C, so you have also changed
> the Q factor. I'm less sure if this would matter, as the circuit
> is operating at a well-fixed frequency.
>
> My remaining concern might be that even with the new C bringing the
> V up,
> the regulation function of the supply may have been lost if the
> transformer
> is no longer functioning in the regions it was designed to.
Yes, but relays are unlikely to be damaged by a few volts too much.
My concern is the current in the intermediate winding could damage
itself.
So far so good but I am charging a much larger capacitance for a
slightly longer period so I would think the current would be higher.
To get 48 volts I am going to have to add about another 6 uF, so about
48 F instead of 15, so very roughly three times the current, assuming
(and its a big assumption I can't justify), that the voltage is the
same.
Please email Anneliese if interested:
-------------------------------------
> My 5.25 inch floppy duplicating machine -
> The Ventuno V5 - diskette autoloader.?
> The documentation has a date of 9/24/1987.?
>
> It is in the original box from Ventuno and has never been
> out of the box.
>
> I also have LOTS of old computer journals (ACM and
> IEEE) and magazines - some going back to the 70s.
>
> Thanks,
> Anneliese Gimpel <anneliese at gimpel.com>
>
I'm looking for Tandon TM100 service manual w/schematics; one of my
TM-100-2 drives in an IBM 5150 here started acting up (stepper motor is
stuck at track 40 and won't decrement) and I'm trying to find a useful
service manual to debug it. The two tm100 documentation/service pdfs
I've seen are a scan of a staple-removed 21 page or so packet (this scan
is missing pages 8, 9, 12, and 13) which has no schematics and is
missing some pages; The other is 7 pages scanned from part of a larger
document (100 pages or so), which looks like it would be useful if I had
the whole thing. Neither of them are particularly helpful.
Does a scan of the larger tm100 service manual exist?
Does anyone have a paper copy I could borrow/copy/etc?
--
Jonathan Gevaryahu
jgevaryahu(@t)hotmail(d0t)com
jzg22(@t)drexel(d0t)edu
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:51:34 -0400
From: Jonathan Gevaryahu <jzg22 at drexel.edu>
Subject: Looking for Tandon TM-100 service manual (w/schematics &
waveforms)
I'm looking for Tandon TM100 service manual w/schematics;
<snip>
Jonathan Gevaryahu
jgevaryahu(@t)hotmail(d0t)com
jzg22(@t)drexel(d0t)edu
---------------
I have a paper version of the technical manual here, but I can't believe that
there isn't a scanned one out there somewhere; if no one comes up with
one and you really can't find one, PM me off-list.
mike