> This is not relevant to this particular rescue, but I know nothing
> about these systems and am curious. What type of OS and app software
> do machines like this run?
990's are 16 bit computers heavily influenced by the architecture of the pdp-11.
The main difference is the working registers were kept in memory, allowing very
fast context switches, at the expense of register access performance. Later machines
cached the register sets.
There was a small single-user floppy disk based os (for the 990/4 based on the TMS9900),
but the main OS was DX-10, which was replaced by DNOS on the 990/12 series.
Their primary use was in small buisiness, they had COBOL, FORTRAN, BASIC, and things
like rje, data base and forms management packages, and networking.
It seems they were widely used in inventory and parts management systems. The history
of the 990 says the system was originally developed as part of a hotel management system.
dave pitt's site (as well as bitsavers)
are good sources of information
http://www.cozx.com/~dpitts/ti990.html
Ade,
I think you mean the small transformer with 6 wires attached, this
transformer has 2 * 9VAC outputs and one AC-line input (230 or 110V depends
on region) This transformer is the supply for the regulator IC's in the PSU
the regulators are places on two small PCB's, on the large PCB there is a
rectifier (Greatz) witch you have to check.
If thats alright you have a reasonable change the PSU works after replacing
the transformer with a similar type 2 * 9VAC 3 to 5VA.
Rik
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
Namens Ade Vickers
Verzonden: woensdag 28 mei 2008 18:38
Aan: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Onderwerp: Transformer repairs
I was messing around with my SX-64 (which is on ePay as a working unit)
yesterday, having located some software & a joystick for it. I was going to
take a few photos of the new bits, etc.; for adding to the listing.
Then: *sharp snap/crack noise*, lights go out.
Aaaargh!
OK, first things first: There was no burning smell, and no (visible) magic
smoke released. The fuse wire in the glass fuse has been vapourised; the
mains fuse survived. I replaced the fuse, which has not since blown, but the
PSU is deader than a dead thing that's been dead for a week.
Some careful poking around with the multimeter (before the multimeter went
bang - ffs, I must have an anti-midas touch this week), then the
oscilliscope, reveals that a secondary transformer on the PSU has failed. I
presume it went dead short, then burnt itself + the fuse out simultaneously;
hence the reason the replacement fuse hasn't blown.
So, what I need to do now is replace the transformer, or get it repaired
somehow (ideally before Sunday, when the ePay auction runs out - or, to
definitely know it is unfixable in that timescale & thus cancel the
auction).
What I DO have, which might make a repair feasible, is a second SX-64; the
only difference is, this one has a US (117v) PSU. Obviously, the primary
transformer windings are going to be different, but is it possible/likely
that the secondary transformer will be the same? Going by the part nos. I'm
not terribly hopeful:
UK Part no: TDK 68-0409 B8326A
US Part No: TDK 68-0407 B8309A
A quick google on any of those numbers reveals nothing...
I don't have the means to create 117v 60hz power, so I can't test that way -
and even if I could, it turns out that the US PSU has taken a wallop at some
point, breaking the circuit board. :(
Hey ho... any help gratefully received.
TIA!
Best Regards,
Ade.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1469 - Release Date: 27/05/2008
13:25
On 30 May, 2008, at 18:00, cctalk-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 17:11:02 +0200
> From: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann at ans-netz.de>
> Subject: Introduction
> To: Classic Computers Mailing List <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Welcome Oliver.
> The system runs a Z8001 with 3 MMUs and Z80-peripherial ICs (PIO,
> SIO...)
> It also has 2 SIOs for 4 terminal connections, and one PIO to
> connect the
> WDC. The system also has two furhter PIO chips to establish a
> connection
> to the 8Bit system. The system runs with up to 4MB of DRAM but it
> might
> run with more RAM with self-made RAM modules.
Three MMUs seems a bit weird. I last programmed a Z8001 in 1979 so
maybe things have changed between then and when your machine was
built. If I remember correctly, the Z8010 MMU mapped 64 of the 128
segments, you could have one MMU and address 64 chunks of up to 64k
in the 16MB address range. With two MMUs you could access all 128
chunks. Are the MMUs set up for different processes, or are they
divided into instruction and data accesses or some other way?
The system I worked on would have eventually had 12 Z8001s each with
one MMU and 128K of local RAM plus the CPU were grouped into modules
of three and had about 3MB of RAM in the module and each module could
also access the other 3 module's RAM, but with more wait states. Each
Z8001 was responsible for managing a wide microprogrammed bit slice
processor for doing heavy mathematics, though the details might still
be secret even though the project was cancelled in the mid eighties,
several years after I left the company.
I got involved quite early, the first draft of the Z8001 instruction
set manual which I was given included a memory to memory transfer
instruction, but that was dropped before they issued the first sample
chips about a year later. A bit of a blow as we had started writing a
Coral 66 compiler for it by then.
When I retire I might get around to getting myself a Z8001 system if
there's any still around by then. I am kept busy at work programming
Apple Macs and at home restoring a 1962 mainframe computer (ICT 1301)
and restoring/maintaining my old cars (2 Daimlers, 2 Rovers, a Land
Rover, a Jaguar and a BMW).
I think you would have to be lucky to get your C code to use exactly
the same registers as the original object code. Are you sure it was
originally C or could it have been assembly code?
So I've got my "hacked-up" PET powering up after redoing a bit of wiring
on the power supply. I replaced a couple of obviously bad 74LS157's in
the video generator section (legs were corroded and some had fallen
off/cracked) and reflowed a couple of suspicious looking joints.
The machine now powers up, the display is bright and crisp but I just
get garbage characters on the display. Using my logic probe I've
verified that the CPU is running, voltages appear nominal (4.9V at the
CPU & RAM). The CPU seems to be running something, in that about 1-2
seconds after power up a few characters on the screen will change (not
where you'd expect the COMMODORE BASIC banner to be printed, but always
in the same places). Typing on the keyboard produces no effect.
I've reduced the board to 4K of 2114s and tried swapping around the
2114s used for the display, but the only effect this has is to change
the pattern of garbage characters displayed (interestingly (at least to
me) each RAM chip produces a different pattern, which is reproducible).
If I run without any video RAM installed, I just get a checkerboard
pattern onscreen, which would make sense since character FF is the
checkerboard tile. Unfortunately I have no idea if any of the 2114s I
have are good or not, though I'd wager that they can't ALL be bad. I
don't have any other machines that use them and I don't have any spares.
Any suggestions on logical places to start looking from here?
Thanks,
Josh
> Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 11:41:15 -0400 (EDT)
> From: der Mouse
> It is probably possible to build a current limiter that provides
> immediate visual feedback. I challenge you, or anyone for that matter,
> to come up with such a design that is as cheap, easy, simple, and
> foolproof as an incandescent bulb. (Well, not cheap once the ban hits,
> which is the problem.)
How's this? Grab a glass jar, fill with water and a salt of your
choice, say, bicarbonate of soda, drop two electrodes into it
(stainless steel or carbon is good; aluminum will tend to polarize
after awhile and form a leaky rectifier). Apply current and watch
for bubbles and/or steam. Vary resistance by varying the distance
between electrodes.
Or use a dill pickle instead if you like glowing pyrotechnics.
We will always have appliances with heating elements floating around
that can be pressed into use, particularly where higher-power loads
are concerned.
What I don't like about incandescents used as a load-limiter is the
very low cold resistance. I'd much rather have a "soft" start--but
then carbon-filament incandescents haven't been easy to find for the
last 80 years or so.
Cheers,
Chuck
I know that some of you here have an interest in vintage video games. How
many of you would be interested in getting together a pool to make new
Atari 2600 and Vectrex cartridge cases?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Andrew Lynch wrote:
> Long story short, I replaced a 74LS245 and a faulty DRAM chip and now the
> board boots fine.
The DRAM I could probably figure out myself, but how did you determine
the 74LS245 was at fault? (I, too, have a 5150 that won't boot)
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org
<http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk> )
http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
-----REPLY-----
Hi,
The old fashioned way; I used an oscilloscope to compare the inputs and
outputs of the bus transceiver. One of the buffers was dead and all of the
outputs on one side looked "funny" so I desoldered it and replaced it with a
new one. Of course, the IBM PC/XT motherboards have few sockets so
desoldering and replacing the chip was awful. I tried to nicely desolder it
but ended up destroying the chip and cutting it out.
One thing I really like about VG, NorthStar, Kaypro, and Heath is almost
their entire motherboards are socketed. Yes, I know direct soldered chips
are technically more reliable but they are a PITA to replace when they do
fail.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
I need a DEC, old style, "pop panel" blank rack panel that's 5 1/4" high.
I'd be happy to trade for a 10 1/2" pop panel if that helps anybody (heck,
I'll trade for two - I've got several of the 10 1/2 panels).
Thanks,
Bob Armstrong