> There was also an Atari Jaguar on an PCI card, Creative Labs' "Jaguar
> Blaster".
>
> They seem to be pretty thin on the ground though, I'd love to get
> one....
The only mention I've ever seen anywhere of a Jaguar Blaster card is here:
http://justclaws.atari.org/altatari/dxnews.htm
Read some of the other items, and you'll soon get the idea that the
stories aren't exactly true.
Actually, there was a Jaguar-on-a-PCI-card project called JagPC that was
at least announced by Sigma Designs. I don't think a prototype ever
existed, but I could be wrong. Jaguars were pretty good 2D pixel-pushers,
and would have made a respectable graphics card for the time period.
-Jeff
jba at sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Does anyone speak fluent Spanish? If so, there's a spanish-language radio
station in Florida that wants to do a 7 minute interview about vintage
computers today at 2:15PM (Eastern).
Contact me ASAP if you'd like to do this and you speak Spanish.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Merely curious. Does anyone know of any IBM PS/2 machines - the proper
Microchannel ones - hosting websites today?
I know of a number of very old Macs doing so, including a Mac Plus
with a website on floppy, machines running System 6 and AU/X. I've
even visited a website hosted on a Commodore 64, I seem to recall.
But never a PS/2 one.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884 ? Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at aol.com ? MSN/Messenger: lproven at hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk ? Skype: liamproven ? ICQ: 73187508
From: Allison <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net>
Subject: Re: 8-bitters and multi-whatever
<snip>
>CP/M or most other OSs for non 8080/z80 could easily be fooled into
>redirecting disk IO to a serial port. Though CP/M was modular enough
>and most widespread it was most often hacked that way. There is
>however no rule that says a OS must talk to a disk as storage and once
>that is clear then it's easy to cobble up a packet protocal that transmits
>the needed data across a serial or parallel port to a willing and enabled
>host. Some systems like the big S100 crates or multibus running MPM used
>the bus and some common memory so that multiple CPUs typically z80 with
>128k ram, rom and serial IO plus a bus interface and memory manangement
>for off board memeory. MPM would be the server and CP/M would be the
>local cpus that users interacted with. It wasn't seen often as it was
>expensive to ahve the hardware and the average hobbiest at the time
>rarely had more than one fully functional system and maybe a SBC
>of the KIM-1, EVK68, AIM65 or SDK85 level.
==============
Don't forget about external RS-232 Network hubs, like the NetCommanders et al;
I had 12 AIM65s and two Cromemcos at a factory site talking to each other back
in those days.
Also, some of the PC local net software could use the parallel and ethernet
ports as well as RS-232 and bridge among them for a peer-peer net, or a
client-server model using an external hub.
Now there's a question, whether Interserver can handle multiple Interlink clients
(one at a time of course); anybody ever try it?
mike
The Nova 4 that I posted about needing a new home has been claimed.
Thanks! I'm sure you'll hear some stories from the new owner in a couple
weeks.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
There's a less often used way of avoiding this problem.
It's the use of 'one' as in 'If one wants to learn to fly then one
should go to a good school'
Rod
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Fred Cisin
Sent: 11 September 2007 23:05
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Wang 300 Calc --> 0/1 power labels
> Oh, FFS!
> Hint: the word "you" in colloquial English usage does not always refer
> directly to an individual or to the person being addressed.
> For example: "If you want to learn to fly a plane, you have to
> demonstrate good vision and a degree of numeracy". This would be a
> perfectly reasonable statement in a magazine or newspaper article,
> without any implication that every reader of that journal is an
> aspiring pilot.
When you use the "impersonal YOU", you run a risk of offending those who
take it personally.
Tony Duell asked about the difference between the two processors - here is
what I found after a little google work;
Steve
The stuff below was brazenly copied from:
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node=ARM2
"As soon as the ARM1 project was completed, work began on its successor, the
ARM2, which later in 1985 became the first commercially available RISC
processor. This processor was intended to correct some problems noted with
the first design, and was aimed specifically for use in the Acorn Archimedes
series of personal computers. While the ARM1 was a success as far as it went,
there were some performance problems which needed to be fixed before it could
be realistically used in the Archimedes.
One of the key problems was a lack of hardware multiply support. This led to
a software routine being used to do multiplication, using shifts and adds,
which was "horribly slow", according to Steve Furber. This was fixed in the
ARM2, by adding two instructions: MUL (multiply) and MLA (multiply with
accumulate). These allowed the ARM2 to be realistically used for mathematical
calculation, and very simple digital signal processing, in particular
generating synthesised sound.
Another issue which still affects most ARM processors even today is the lack
of floating point hardware. Acorn decided to address this problem by adding
hardware co-processor support to the ARM2, and at a later date intended to
ship an optional floating point accelerator. Ultimately, the ARM2 FPA was
never produced, despite demand from the Acorn user community: the first
hardware FP came as an option with the ARM3 powered A5000, and around the
same time a third party ARM3 and FPA upgrade was marketed by Simtec for all
Archimedes computers.
Finally, the design team noted that banking only registers R10 to R15 in fast
interrupt mode was slightly over-frugal, and added R8 and R9 to that list.
This increased performance of the very common FIQ by lowering memory accesses
to stack registers. The ARM2 was manufactured at a slightly smaller
fabrication size than the ARM1, 2.5?m as opposed to 3.5?m, had just over
25,000 transistors, and ran at 8MHz."
William Maddox said:
> it on such short notice during the week, however all
> worked out well in the end. I have some pictures of
> the "haul" as
> it arrived in San Jose up at www.ddp116.org .
Wow! Very, very nice haul. Whatever the expense
was, it sure looks like you got your money's worth.
Is this system going to be on display somewhere
during VCMX timeframe? I don't know if it is going
to live in the warehouse where it was deposited
by the truck, but it sure would be fun to have a
closeup view of the system, blinking lights
preferred! ;-) Or, not, even.
Congrats on saving a great collection!
- Jared
William Maddox said:
> it on such short notice during the week, however all
> worked out well in the end. I have some pictures of
> the "haul" as
> it arrived in San Jose up at www.ddp116.org .
Wow! Very, very nice haul. Whatever the expense was, it sure looks like
you got your money's worth.
Is this system going to be on display somewhere during VCMX
timeframe? I don't know if it is going to live in the warehouse where it
was deposited by the truck, but it sure would be fun to have a closeup
view of the system, blinking lights preferred! :-)
Congrats on saving a great collection!
- Jared