Well, I managed to accquire more hardware... This time
in the form of a couple CDC hard drives - one 9775
(Fixed media, 650mb) and one 9766 (300mb removeable).
I also wound up with an 11/84 and a couple RL02's and
one and a half RA80's. (my first Unibus 11, and my
first removable pack drives - yay!) I'm very excited -
this hardware is all new to me, and very different
>from what I already have. The 11/84 is much "beefier"
physically than my wimpy little 11/73, and I've never
owned freestanding hard drives. But - I digress.
I had to drive about 950 miles round trip to pick
these up. Truck rental is very expensive. I drive a
Toyota Camry. So, I borrowed my father's minivan, a
Chevy Venture. I've moved all manner of heavy
hardware, racks, printers, etc in it, and figured that
it would be fine for the task. Getting the stuff in
was pretty easy. The CDC drives were slightly bigger
than I had envisioned, but they fit. We loaded it with
a ramp and a loading dock, and I had two people
helping me, so I didn't fully appreciate just how
heavy the CDC drives were. The PDP-11 rack was a 5
foot rack that was a simple "tip and slide", and some
loose rack mountable stuffs stacked easily next to it.
At this point, I had the van completely crammed - the
passenger seat was pushed forward and angled forward
as far as it would go, with the two CDC drives behind
the seats, then the PDP rack on the passsenger side in
the back, and stuff stacked behind the other drive on
the drivers side. Some disk packs were seat belted
into the passenger seat.
The van rode really low, but was still driveable,
albiet more "sluggish", and I had to top up one of the
tires before driving back. I drove the route back in
one shot - no stops for anything. I didn't get home
until late, and only brought in the disk packs.
It took me the better part of a week to figure out how
to get the CDC drives *out* of the van. I was able to
get the PDP-11 out with little difficulty. It's just a
rack and some loose stuff. No problems there. But
those CDC drives were so heavy that I couldn't even
tilt them much in the van, and they's sunken into the
carpet and weren't able to roll, not to mention the
holes in the floor where the seats normally latch
into. I found the operators manual for the CDC 9775
(BZ7Ex) on bitsavers - it lists the specs for the
drive - weight 639 pounds! Oh, good. At least I think
the 9766 is lighter. A little.
It took a few days to get friends with time to help
me, but we managed to get the drives out of the van
yesterday night. I'll spare you the gory details, but
I removed the power supplies from both drives first,
as well as the doors and panels. When moving these,
heavy is an understatement. Now I just need to get
them into the basement.
So... now does anyone have a scan of the service or
installation manual for a 9775?
I'm sure others have stories about loading hardware in
and out of vehicles... I'll post pictures later...
-Ian
I've got a PDP-11/23+ with 4 Mb RAM, but only one RL02 and no software
except an XXDP pack. Henk Gooijen helpfully made for me a (RT-11)
bootable pack that is on the way (if the post offices between Europe
and the US don't lose or destroy it). So I definitely want to make a
backup copy.
Is this possible to do with only one drive? Apparently you can't swap
disks back and forth like the old DOS or CP/M systems. Henk thinks
creating a RAM disk would work, and copy files but I don't know
anything about RT-11.
The alternative is to take the RL02 from my PDP-8/A and connect it,
but then I don't have a "1" key, they are both unit "0".
Any thoughts?
thanks
Charles
Looooooooooooooooooong gone.
One of the founders was Saul Denman, creator of the PDP8/S
John Bordynuik contacted him years ago while researching
the history of the 8/S
great.. I see he has let pdp8.com croak.
Info may be saved at archive.org
I have an email address at the bottom of every page of Manx, my
catalogue of computer manuals, and an invitation to people to send me
questions or comments. I expect people to ask questions about the
catalogue, but instead I usually receive requests from far-flung
countries to quote for supplying spare parts for their ancient hardware.
Ho hum.
But today I received a question from someone who believes that my humble
catalogue is the online presence of the mighty Manx Corporation. The
email is reproduced below. Google has been no assistance in providing
any answers.
Surely someone here knows what became of GRI Computer Corporation? I'll
pass on any responses.
--quote--
I have some stocks (100 shares) that were purchased in 1972 for G.R.I.
Computer Corp. When searching for information regarding this company and
whether or not it still exists - I end up being redirected to this page
for the Manx Corporation. Do you happen to know if G.R.I was purchased
by Manx or how I might go about researching the value for these stocks?
Any help is appreciated.
--endquote--
--
Paul
for the mighty Manx Corporation
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 15:28:01 -0500
From: Doc Shipley <doc at mdrconsult.com>
Subject: Re: Unix disk copy using dd
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
> M H Stein wrote:
>
>> Assuming you have a third disk or a spare partition on the larger drive,
>> can't you tar the small disk > to a file there and then untar to the
>> final
>> disk/partition?
>
>
> You're assuming that the small disk the data is coming from contains a
> file system.
> And, if it does, it's more efficient to use a pipe instead of a tarfile.
>Peace... Sridhar
--------------
Mike:
I did indeed assume a filesystem; under what circumstances would a Unix
hard disk not have a file system?
And what do you mean specifically by "use a pipe"? Example?
If you don't need an archive copy couldn't you just copy the boot file and
cp the root?
My experience with Unix is pretty limited, but this is how I archive and
copy systems with Cromix; the tar file is copied to a PC and zipped, and
unzipped and restored if/when needed. If there's a more efficient way, I'm
definitely interested.
=========
Doc wrote:
> Enering pedant mode, even if the source disk has a filesystem, tar
can't grab boot blocks, partition tables, extended attributes, etc. And
various tar implementations have other nasty little warts.
-------------
Mike:
Granted, you'd have to create the boot block on the new drive, but I
thought the whole point was to _not_ copy the partition table since you're
moving to a larger drive? In my Cromix experience at least, which
attributes are retained seems to be a function of the version of tar
(or ftar) and the options selected.
=======
> dd is about the dumbest** command on the planet, which is why I love it.
>
> Doc
-------------
Mike:
Ditto, but how would you use it in this case?
m
More disk copy questions..
Can you copy an entire disk using the UNIX dd command from a smaller disc to
a larger one and retain the capacity of the larger drive?
i.e. maybe create a partition on the larger drive which matches the smaller
drive?
Thanks,
Andy.
>Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
>> I have BasiliskII installed via apt on Ubuntu. I've sucessfully read and
>> installed the 6.0.8 system disks as downloaded from Apple's archive. The
>> rom images I have and have tried are for a Quadra650 and a Performa.
>> BasiliskII doesn't like the Mac Plus rom. On boot, I get a complaint that
>> this Mac is set for 32-bit addressing and that I should switch to 24-bit
>> addressing (since os6 doesn't do 32-bitness). Clicking "24-bit" doesn't
>> work. Does anyone here know how to get this working?
>
>Which Performa? Those ROMs may be too new for System 6.
To elaborate a bit on Cameron's point...
System 6 requires 24 bit addressing on the host machine. The first
Macs were based on the 68000 which only has 24 address bits. When
they added the Mac II and SE/30 to the line-up they switched to the
68020 and 68030 which have 32 address bits, but the OS was still
operating in a 24 bit address space.
So, in order to run System 6 you need hardware which can translate to
24 bit addresses.
Apple included the feature of a choice of 24 bit or 32 bit addressing
modes in early Macs, but abandoned it somewhere in the middle of the
Quadra (68040) line-up. So, for example, the Quadra 605 can do both
24 bit and 32 bit addressing, but the Quadra 63x family cannot.
My guess is that the Quadra 650 does not include support for 24 bit
addressing and neither does the performa you used. This would
definitely be true of any Performa 63x, or later PowerPC Performas.
So, you most likely need a ROM image from an older machine.
Also, even if 24 bit addressing is supported in the emulated, ROM
imaged machine, Apple dropped support for OS 6 somewhere along the
way in their hardware/firmware. I suspect that regardless of the 24
bit/32 bit issue, the Q650 will not run anything earlier than some
flavor of OS 7. I may be misremembering, but that's how I would
bet. You may want to check a website such as everymac.com, because
I believe it lists the OS's supported by each Mac model.
Jeff Walther
----------Original Message:
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:39:48 +0100
From: "Andy Piercy" <andy.piercy at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Unix disk copy using dd ?
So basically you can only use dd to copy to a disk of the same size.
OK so here is the real issue:
I have a faulty Unis system disk that is 142 Mb, it had the sticky bumpers
issue, now repaired but I want to copy the OS and apps to a second
replacement disk, this is a 442 Mb drive.
----------Reply:
Perhaps I misunderstood the problem earlier; when you say faulty but
repaired, do you mean that you can read the disk but the file system
is corrupted, or is the disk in fact bootable & runnable?
mike
Al Kossow wrote:
> It sounds like Zane (maybe Tim Shoppa) have been in
> contact with them recently, so there is no need for yet
> another set of people to be involved.
If "Recently" is "2000", then yes, I worked extensively with
Mentec to make three sets of hobbyist CD's (RT-11, RSX-11,
RSTS/E) using my archives and their archives to get bootable
kits for emulators.
> As I understand it, they have no interest in offering a
> low cost license no matter how many people ask about it.
Internally, there was interest, and I discussed it with several
at Mentec in the 1996-2001 timeframe as I worked with them
on other projects, and it got as far
as them having a web page with pictures of the CD's I made
for them. But no, not all the legal barriers were jumped, so
it never really happened.
I don't think anyone truly understands the legal barriers
that Mentec faces. They do not own all the stuff free and
clear to do with as they wish. In the late 90's, they could
not sell a copy of any PDP-11 OS unless they also sold
DEC's printed manuals with it, and they were having extreme
troubles getting DEC's printed manuals from DEC's print
shop.
The folks in Mentec who were most enthusiastic about it
were really nice, energetic people.
I don't have any sore feelings about the work I did back
then (I had a blast) but I don't have as much interest in
the subject as I did ten years ago. Being out at the CHM
last year rekindled it a little... but there's no shortage of
truly redistributable and very-few-condition other stuff
that I'm worrying about now.
Tim.