Hi,
I haven't got ULTRIX/VAX V3.0C, but:
V2.0
V3.1 (disk image only)
V4.2
V4.4
V4.5
I'd like to have the missing versions, too.
More ULTRIX-Manuals would be VERY interesting as well.
(I scanned the ones at bitsavers.com)
What type of VAX do you want to run ULTRIX on?
Regards,
Ulli
A few weeks ago, some people in here were talking about putting network
cards in IBM PCs or XTs or something...
As it happens, I ran across a box of 3com 3c503 network cards (AUI and
10BaseT ports, 8 bit ISA card).
If anyone wants one, lemme know, I'm asking $5+shipping, and I'll have
the box with me at Dayton if you want to harass me about them, then.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCAC --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
Hi,
I'm looking for Software & Manuals for any of the MUMPS implementations for the PDP-11,
e.g. MUMPS-11, DSM-11 or M/11+.
Can anybody help?
Regards,
Ulli
Hopefully, this request is clear enough to be understood. Both the
software and the hardware portion of the questions are independently
important, so please answer one aspect even if you can't help with
the other.
Over the past 30 years of using PDP-11 software (RT-11 over 95%)
and hardware, I have never had occasion to use a Unibus system with
more than 256 KB of memory (such as a PDP-11/34).
I would appreciate help in understanding the Unibus Map hardware which
(if I understand its purpose correctly) is to convert 18 bit addresses given
to a Unibus controller into 22 bit addresses for real physical memory for
systems like a PDP-11/84 and perform DMA from / to the hard drive.
Also helpful would be an explanation of the related software used under
RT-11 along with exactly where the Unibus Map hardware is located
on a real DEC system (on the CPU board I presume) since the identical
CPU board is used for both the Qbus and the Unibus with both the
PDP-11/84 and the PDP-11/94.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
DO NOT READ THE FOLLOWING if you don't use RT-11!!!!!!!
By way of context, I have successfully modified the HD0: device driver
originally written by John Wilson which obviously executes ONLY under
E11. Last week, John mentioned in a private e-mail that it is possible to
direct the HD0: "controller" (all references to hardware in quotes refers
to E11 software) to ignore the "Unibus Map hardware". Since I execute
under E11 using Qbus emulation in order to stay totally compatible with
the real DEC PDP-11/23, PDP-11/73 and PDP-11/83 systems (all Qbus
and all with 4 MB of physical memory) which I have available for comparison
testing, user buffers in physical memory above 256 KB are often a situation
which can't be avoided.
Consequently, it had always been a high priority to have a 22 bit device
driver
for HD0: under E11 BECAUSE HD0: is TWICE as fast as MSCP (DUX.SYS
device driver). In addition, I have also been able to write code that
avoids the
overhead of using the HD0: device driver which makes HD0: FOUR times as
fast as MSCP and also allows for direct access of 2 TB of disk space via a
32 bit block number. Since I have an immediate application for a data base
of 32 GB (I have a disk drive of 160 GB, so 32 GB is only 20% of its
capacity -
although under RT-11 15 years ago in 1992, 32 GB would have been only a
dream), the code which I have written will actually be used quite soon.
However, I would very much like the HD0: device driver to be able to execute
under both "Qbus" and "Unibus" hardware. And while I can test the code for
a "Qbus" and for a "Unibus" without a "Unibus Map", I am not clear about
what is required for a "Unibus" with a "Unibus Map" such as a PDP-11/84
running under RT-11.
Megan are you still watching the list? Allison, if you can't answer,
can anyone
but Megan help? Is anyone else familiar enough with the "Unibus Map" that
you can suggest what RT-11 actually needs to do with the "Unibus Map"?
A solution is to check the "hardware" configuration and refuse to allow the
HD0: device driver to LOAD or .Fetch if the modified version is not
executing under "Qbus hardware".
By the way, if anyone who is thinking of a controller for the Qbus which is
able to use SATA drives, I would be happy to modify an RT-11 device
driver to an HD0: type device that is able to handle drives up to 2 TB
in the same manner that DU(X).SYS can handle drives up to 8 GB.
Anyone interested??
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.
I'm trying to use simh to create an RT-11 bootable RX50 disk and am
following some instructions posted by Megan Gentry a while ago. I've
created the disk image but am having trouble making it bootable. The
copy/boot command claims it can't find the RT-11 image but it is
clearly on the floppy (du0). Any idea what's going wrong?
.dir du0:
10-Apr-99
RT11XM.SYS 106P 20-Dec-85 DU .SYS 8P 20-Dec-85
TT .SYS 2P 20-Dec-85 PIP .SAV 30P 20-Dec-85
DUP .SAV 47P 20-Dec-85 DIR .SAV 19P 20-Dec-85
RESORC.SAV 25P 20-Dec-85 EDIT .SAV 19P 20-Dec-85
MACRO .SAV 61P 20-Dec-85 CREF .SAV 6P 20-Dec-85
LINK .SAV 49P 20-Dec-85 LIBR .SAV 24P 20-Dec-85
FILEX .SAV 22P 20-Dec-85 HELP .SAV 132P 20-Dec-85
BATCH .SAV 26P 20-Dec-85 FORMAT.SAV 24P 20-Dec-85
SETUP .SAV 41P 20-Dec-85 SPEED .SAV 4P 20-Dec-85
DATIME.SAV 4P 20-Dec-85 LET .SAV 5P 20-Dec-85
SPLIT .SAV 3P 20-Dec-85 CONFIG.SAV 7P 20-Dec-85
SWAP .SYS 27P 20-Dec-85
23 Files, 691 Blocks
95 Free blocks
.copy/boot du0:rt11xm.sys du0:
?DUP-F-File not found DU0:RT11XM.SYS
>
>Subject: TU-58s (was Re: Some progress with my PDP-11/73 system)
> From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:54:24 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On 4/11/07, Jerome H. Fine <jhfinedp3k at compsys.to> wrote:
>> But I once had a project that
>> used a real DEC TU-58. Not the fastest "random"
>> access device!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>They work better as "sequential" access devices - being long and thin
>and travelling in one dimension, go figure. We used to optimize file
>order on our console TU58s to speed up the boot times on our 11/725s
>and 11/730s. Since the file order doesn't change, one just builds a
>TU58 with EXCHANGE with each file following the other. The console's
>8-bit-micro must cache the directory block, since the tape didn't whip
>back to the start between each file.
>
>Using unaltered console tapes from DEC resulted in, IIRC, about 15
>minutes from turning the key to booting the hard disk. Replacing that
>tape with one of our own devising shortened that pre-boot time to well
>under 3 minutes.
>
>I'd hate to rely on a TU-58 and no other block-addressable media on a
>PDP-11, though. I survived a PDP-8 with a TD8E and TU56, but it was
>somewhat tedious (cool to watch, though). TU-58s weren't as cool,
>IMHO.
So happens one of my "small" pdp-11s uses a Tu58. the system is a BA-11V
with an 11/23 256k of ram, DLV11J and MRV11 rom(boot). Takes 10 minutes
to boot, setup VM: then copy key files to and reboot. After that it's
pretty decent even if I have to access a file on tape.
Everytime I runs it with a bunch of kids of the current PC generations
they go gaga and comment on how slow then I explain the amount of ram and
storage then they are amazed it can be a functional machine with so little.
They can't imagine a useful machine with 32kW of ram and 256kb of storage.
On the flip side I've used that same Tu58 to bring up iron that had no
removable storage. It's slow but very dependable.
Allison
heres a link to some lead solder
http://www.acehardware.com/product/index.jsp?productId=1290635&cp=2568443.2…
Chris
On 10/2/07, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
>
> At 11:37 PM +0100 10/1/07, Tony Duell wrote:
> >For the first part, I'd offer to do it for you, but it would be illegal
> >to do so. Owing to our totally daft laws, (a) I'd have to use lead-free
> >solder, which I don't have, don't trust, and am not set up to use and
>
> How hard is it to work with lead-free solder, and is it becoming a
> problem to get traditional solder in the US? I've been meaning to
> pick up a few rolls. As I'm still using a roll purchased in the 80's
> from Rat Shack for building a couple things for my VIC-20, I haven't
> been going through it that fast. Though I seem to be using it more
> often now than.
>
> >(b)
> >it has been said that if an enthusiast (specifically a model engineer,
> >but it would apply here too) does jobs for others, then his workshop
> >becomes a workplace and is covered by all the daft health-and-safety
> >rules that I have no desire to get involved with, and which quite
> >honestly, would stop me from getting on with things.
>
> Does it count as a job if you don't take payment?
>
> Zane
>
>
> --
> | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
> | healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
> | MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
> +----------------------------------+----------------------------+
> | Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
> | PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
> | http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
>
Have a working Intel Above Board Plus 8 with 2MB RAM and would like to
populate it to the full 8MB. It will take 120ns or faster 1mbit chips
-- but where can one find that kind of thing nowadays? Are those still
commercially available or am I going to have to scavenge them from
somewhere else?
Manual lists acceptable part numbers like:
Fujitsu MB81C1000P-xx
Hitachi HM511000P-xxS
Mitsubishi M5M41000AP-xx
Motorola M5M511000P-xx
NEC UPD421000C-xx
NMB AAA1M100-xx
OKI M511000RS-xx
Samsung KM41C1000P-xx
TI TMS4C1024-xx
Toshiba TC511000P-xx
...etc but google searches haven't been very fruitful (that is, the
pages returned when I search for IC part numbers don't return vendors
with plain pricing/availability info).
I just want a few tubes of these to populate the board, I'm not looking
for a box of 'em :-) Any pointers?
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
I've more of these than anyone will need and they're all brand new.
3 packs of Bernoulli 5.25 44meg disks
KAO 5.25 88meg syquest disks. The label inside says they are formatted for
Macs but includes software for wintel machines also.
$1 each plus whatever for shipping and they're yours. Just say how many you
want.
--
I am not willing to give up my privacy for the false promise of 'security'
Hello people,
I am dumping my small collection. If anybody is interested and is able to
pick it up, you are welcome to get it. I do not ship or store. It was a
complete microvax 3800 (upgraded to 3900) but I took the KA655 to fix my
barebone 3900. You get the computer with RA7? DISK, DSSI disk controller,
memory, ethernet card, tape card and tape drive. Plug in a KA655 and it is
ready to go.
vax9000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever watched "American Beauty"?