Michael B. wrote:
In the case of a really old system like that, it doesn't matter what the
network is - the network will never be the problem, unless I use bongos
as the transport mechanism.
Mike
-----------------
I had a computer like that once...
Billy
> Maybe the 680 and it's basic isn't fast enough for my program?
This is quite possible as interpreting decimal numbers takes a fair bit of
processing. You may like to try this ..
1 A=61456:B=61441:C=61457:D=1:E=0
2 IF (D AND PEEK(A)) = E THEN POKE B, PEEK(C)
3 GOTO 2
.. which should speed things up a bit.
Lee.
I just modified my program to get rid of the polling. It did not really
speed up the display of characters. ; )
I can now see the full records with some duplicated digits here and there.
Its interesting that the program below free running can only process
characters at 300bps
1 POKE 61441, PEEK(61457)
2 GOTO 1
At a 500Khz clock thats over 1000 clock cycles per loop. SO THIS IS HOW
Micro-Soft got started with slow software??? ; )
So any suggestions on getting started QUICKLY with 6800 assembler? Maybe
one that outputs in Motorola punch tape format???
I want to archive Altair 680 KCACR basic before anything else happens to
this tape. I had about 5-6 failed loads this weekend and I don't want to
risk loosing this KCACR basic! : (
Grant
Yellow Dog is the most polished distro FWIU. There are
older versions of Mandrake too. Would you get gcc
though I aks myself. Funny...Im not getting an answer
--- cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
<pat at computer-refuge.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 January 2007 00:12, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> > Yeah, no kidding--someone game me a Mac 6100/60.
Not very exciting,
> > but I've upgraded the memory to 40 MB and added a
4GB hard disk from
> > parts in my hellbox.
> >
> > So, does anyone have any first-hand experience
with Linux on one of
> > these critters? Is it worth the installation
trouble?
>
> I ran a 6100/60 with a NuBus ethernet card in the
PDS slot (with the
> appropriate PDS->nubus adapter) using Debian with
some old mklinux
> kernel, as a NATing firewall with good success, a
few years ago.
> Support for newer kernels is pretty much
non-existant (I'm not sure if
> they support past 2.2; I know they don't go past 2.4
kernels), so you'd
> have to go with an appropriately vintage Linux
distribution.
>
> Pat
> --
> Purdue University ITAP/RCAC ---
http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
> The Computer Refuge ---
http://computer-refuge.org
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> I have one of these and I'm looking information on it. I might be willing
> to trade or sell it. If you have any info or interest, please contact me off
> list.
Thanks, Paul
> And with so much radiation being shot onto metals and like, does it
> became radioactive?
>
> I have some MSX here that I want to "give it a shot" (pun intended)
> hehehe
>
Remeber- two types of radiation: particle (Alpha, Beta, neutrons,
protons) and electromagnetic (gamma, X-ray, radio, light, etc). The
particles can make things radioactive, the electromagnetic radiation
cannot.
All:
The SB6120 and the TI74 have been spoken for as of now. Thanks
for your interest.
Dan Veeneman.do you have another email address? I got an error
>from your receiving mail server rejecting my reply. I'll also try sending
>from another account.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Lead engineer, Altair32 Emulator
Web site: <http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/>
http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
Web site: http://www.altair32.com/
/***************************************************/
Fred Csin wrote
>> Keep it in historical context... Bongos were a significant speed
>> increase over smoke signals.
>
> ??
> ~1100 feet per second v 186,000 miles per second
>
> But bongos could operate without line of sight,
> and with or without ambient light.
>
Well, smoke signals may have lower latency, but bongos would have
higher possible switching speeds and so better bandwidth. Things don't
change much, do they?
Scott