Some of you here might know this :) I've got a system here where I need to
make it think that there's a monitor plugged into its VGA port even when there
isn't (long story).
Plugging a real CRT into the port even when that CRT is switched off and
unplugged from the AC supply works, so there's obviously some way of doing it.
Measuring the CRT above (switched off, unplugged from AC, and unplugged from
the device) with respect to the VGA connector's shield gives me the following
readings:
pin sig value
1 R 76ohm
2 G 76ohm
3 B 76ohm
4 NC GND
5 GND GND
6 GND GND
7 GND GND
8 GND GND
9 NC infinite resistance
10 GND GND
11 NC GND
12 DDC DAT 8.1Kohm (initially 7.6Kohm, rose at first then steadied)
13 HSYNC 4.6Kohm
14 VSYNC 4.7Kohm
15 DDC CLK 8.1Kohm (initially 7.6Kohm, rose at first then steadied)
Any suggestions? Do I just need 76ohm resistors to ground on the RGB lines
(and possibly 4.7Kohm resistors to ground on HSYNC and VSYNC)? Or is there
likely something more subtle going on that I need to incorporate into my
"fake" connector? (Given that VGA supplies no DC out, it can't be anything too
complex!)
cheers
Jules
http://cgi.ebay.com/Multiprocessor-Motorolla-68000-Coax-Bank-Server-Fa
stbus_W0QQitemZ280072362339QQihZ018QQcategoryZ4193QQssPageNameZWDVWQQr
dZ1QQcmdZViewItem
All the info is in the listing, what I need to know is what was this
before it became a set of boards?
Thanx
Ryan
$4.95/mo. National Dialup, Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus, 5mb personal web space. 5x faster dialup for only $9.95/mo. No contracts, No fees, No Kidding! See http://www.All2Easy.net for more details!
Brad Parker wrote:
Heh. I remember someone asking me (at work) if a 3.5" ST-506 drive
would work in zero G.
I ask where it was installed and they said a KC-135 :-)
Apparently someone wanted to use one in the "vomit comet"...
and apparently it worked (at least they never complained that
it didn't)
I don't know how high those where pressurized, but I'd guess
around 8000ft. No doubt the old drives didn't need as much
air density; the flying height was not that low. I have no
idea how air pressure affects the boundary layer over the
surface - I assume less density translates to less drag and
then to a lower flight.
-brad
----------------------------------------
Cold is not nice to disk drives. More than flying height, the mechanical
parts become stiffer and don't flex correctly. Bearings becomse stiff and
generate vibration. Seals shrink.
A lot of work is being done on self heating. This will be needed when
drives go into cell phones in the near future. The drive uses the
electronics to get to a certain temperature before loading the heads off the
ramp.
Air pressure does affect the boundary layer, especially at high RPM. There
comes a point where it goes negative and sucks the heads down. The testing
I saw showed this somewhere around 18-20K RPM. For drives on the market
today, flying height is controlled and compensates for altitude.
As for cell phones and hard drives, yes, I know that Flash is getting
cheaper and is in a surplus situation right now. And with 4 level cells
coming along, the cost per bit is going down. But hard drives will still be
used in cell phones, because those devices have exploding storage
requirements, thanks to new features.
Look at Apple's iPhone, with all the bells and whistles. And only 8GB of
storage. They've sold millions of iPods with 20, 30, 40, and 60GB of
storage. Those users will demand more storage as they use the iPhone.
Cell phones do now and will in the future use hard drives. Cold is one of
the biggest unsolved problems. Shock is looking so-so with free fall
sensors. Power cosumption is the biggest detractor. But a hybrid with a
big cache could solve that.
Billy
Jim Leonard wrote:
Yep! There are only two drawbacks to microdrives:
- Slower than real flash
- Can't use 6000+ feet above sea level (lack of air pressure can make
the drive go wonky or, rarely, break it)
--
Jim Leonard
---------------------------
I have to strongly dispute this; The IBM (later Hitachi) MicroDrive was
rated at 10K feet. I did competitive testing on it and the Seagate 1" drive
and both had no problems at 10K feet. In fact both + the WD 1" drive work
fine well past 10K feet.
Come to that, Maxtor, Miniscribe, IBM and DEC built drives in Colorado well
above 6000 feet. Apple used to have a factory at Fountain (6400 feet). So
this simply isn't true. The biggest customer of the MicroDrive - Apple
iPods - work great on the ski slopes. They also work great in Reno at 7000+
feet. I can personally vouch for this and I'm certain others on the list
can too.
They also work fine on airplanes, which are pressurized at 8000 feet.
I have never heard of a drive breaking because of altitude. Rarely, you get
a head gimbals or suspension problem that doesn't like 9000+ feet. But that
is a defective drive, not the rule.
All drive vendors and many OEM buyers do extensive testing to ensure this.
And all heads are testing for flying height before being installed in a
drive.
Finally, today's drives utilize Dynamic Flying Height technology which uses
a heating element in the head to maintain constant controlled flying height.
Altitude is not a problem with any drive on the market today.
Billy
Hi folks,
Whilst shrinking in embarrassment at my own website efforts going back to
the mid 90s I thought I'd look at www.digital.com for a bit of nostalgia,
only to be told that the site is blocked and isn't available.
Anyone know why?
Wayback machine: http://www.archive.org/web/web.php
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer
collection?
>> Bus transceiver chips for Q-bus and Unibus
> The answer is 7406.
For a very small value of "Q-bus and Unibus"
Read the Unibus Handbook for the reasons why.
Rumor has it that 9000 VAX may have mentioned these words:
>On 1/18/07, Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org> wrote:
>>
>>9000 VAX wrote:
>> > After one hour of surfing the internet, I finally bought 4 IDE-CF
>>adapters
>> > (laptop and desktop versions, $2 each). One for the laptop, one for the
>> > pentium PC linux router, one for the 386 desktop.
>> >
>> > Just want to share the experience with you so you do not need to waste
>> > the 1
>> > hour as I did.
>>
>>Where did you find the IDE-CF adapters? I'm in need of a few myself.
>
>
> From that biggest on-line bazaar that many list members are bashing now for
>its lastest BS.
Ah yes... but if anyone actually *wanted* to support a Classic Computer
company, you could buy them here:
http://www.cloud9tech.com/
Not the cheapest, but hey - they're great guys and can be found over on the
maltedmedia.com CoCo list. At the same time, you could pick up an IDE
interface for your CoCo that has a built-in CF socket right on it...
;-)
Laterz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger | "Profile, don't speculate."
SysAdmin, Iceberg Computers | Daniel J. Bernstein
zmerch at 30below.com |
I found your post while searching for an ICE-196PC. Have you sold this
item yet? If not, can you answer a few questions?
Specifically, does the emulator have a flex cable going from the PC
board to the processor pod? Is it gold, with silkscreen 456583-001 (or
-002) TEK INTEL?
If so, I would be interested. Please let me know your asking price.
Regards,
Andrew.
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
>
>
>
> I have thousands of DEC boards, including DZ11's, here if any one needs
> them for replacements or parts.
Thanks, Paul Anderson
In article <e1d20d630701241825v79ce0844h46abf02c3c40596 at mail.gmail.com>,
> "William Donzelli" <wdonzelli at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Maintaining old DEC stuff would indeed be a niche, so I can understand
> > that. However, someof the things I said still apply. For example, when
> > a DZ11 goes bad, do you actually fix the board (I assume, of course,
> > that you use DZ11s)?. It does not really make sense to, from a
> > business perspective, since good ones are common as dirt and quite
> > available.
>
> Just don't scrap the DZ11s, make them available to people who want to
> scrounge bus transceiver chips from them.
>
> Bus transceiver chips for Q-bus and Unibus are *not* common as dirt
> and more than a few of us have scratched our heads on how to create
> new compatible circuits. Meanwhile, the scroungers taught me that
> it might be easier to scrounge the bus transceiver chips off of dead
> or readily available boards.
> --
> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
> <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>
>
> Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>
>
>