There's a mom+pop computer shop in Takoma Park, MD that likes to stick all
the oldest hardware they have in their front window. The only thing they
have I've never seen before is a hard disk assembly, in a clear plastic
case (maybe 30cm by 50cm), 3 platers, with a warranty sticker that says
IBM and 10SR. I'm curious what sort of systems these were used in.
Alexey
Hi,
I have an Intel 225MDS with the single 8inch floppy, expansion unit and
external dual 8inch floppies. I do not have the cable to attach the external
drives. Does anyone have the pinouts so I can make my own cable?
river
PS:
Oh, in regards to the comments about the delivery of cctalk information, I
think it would be better to have a web site. That way you can set up various
forums and threads to facilitate the searching of information and also
categorise the various messages and topics. This will allow you to ignore
those topics you are not interested in and focus only in your area of
interest/expertise. I find the scrolling through emails to be rather archaic
and doesn't make use of the modern technology/forums that are available to
us. We may like our old systems, but we aren't total luddites (are we?), and
there's no reason why we can't present our information in a more avdanced
form.
Furthermore going to a web-based system would attract more people. Sure,
there will be the "wookie" factor - but this is something that has always
been around, regardless of the medium. But, it will make our information
more accessible and appealing to others who have similar interests, or those
wishing to learn an embark on the hobby of classic computing.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/430 - Release Date: 28/08/2006
So I picked up an FP11-A this week. Looks like it might need some
over-the-top connectors to hook it up to my 11/34 (whenever I get that all
put together...).
Anyone have any idea what I need as far as connectors/cables/etc and what
exactly it hooks to in the CPU cardset/backplane?
Thanks,
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCAC --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
Considering the amount of bandwidth wasted here on other
OT topics (and often also on On-topic issues), it seems pretty
picayune to waste even more on whether a P70 is OT or not.
Much better to just let it go by than to add more dross to the pile,
in my opinion. Interesting that discussions about (e.g.) whether
hydrochloric acid is toxic don't trigger the same kind of
response...
Besides, if everyone felt that it was OT, they wouldn't reply;
apparently many people thought it wasn't.
However, it would be nice if words like f***ing were avoided.
Just my contribution to the pile...
mike
I think that this just squeaks in as being on topic.
I am looking for suggestions for an operating system for a PC, specs 75
MHZ Pentium, 16 MB Ram, 4 GB HD, currently running PC-DOS Ver 7.
Original IBM PC-DOS right out of the factory sealed box. I am thinking
about putting GEM on the machine, maybe CP/M-86. Thought about GEOS,
but rejected it, too closed.
Specs seem too tight for Linux or BSD, or at least little advantage over
DOS or CP/M.
Anyone have experience with an operating system that might work, and be
capable of useful work?
IRIX seems to use some variant of the "magic number" database to assign file type
in Indigo Magic. The association between the file type and default application is, however,
extremely involved and obscure. I like the use of FTR, though.
Sorry for contributing to the spam level, but you have to break an egg,
etc. I promise that if anybody replies, I won't reply to the classiccmp
list.
There are hundreds of people on this list; most post infrequently, if at
all. It seems that 5% of the list have a hair trigger that demands that
they respond to every message. That would be fine, but it seems like at
least 50% of such messages are WAY OFF TOPIC. Yes, I'm shouting, and
yes I'm making up numbers.
All of these hundreds of people are very smart and know many things.
Most of the sense to exercise some self control and not jump in at every
opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge, or worse, their unsupported
opinions.
The ONLY thing that gives cctalk value is that it has a charter. There
are untold avenues on the internet if you want to have free ranging
discourse.
Before you hit send on your next message to cctalk, ask yourself these
intertwined questions:
(1) Why am I not sending this as a private reply?
Is it just your ego wanting to be seen as a
smart person that needs a large audience? If
John Public says cheese tastes bad, send John
Public a private message if you want to tell
him he is wrong; the rest of us don't need to
know about it.
(2) What new information is this message offering?
Is it worth the time of 600 people (or whatever)
even if all they need to do his scan the subject
line and hit delete? This isn't IRC, so hopefully
posts will be more thoughtful than that.
(3) Is this message still about classic computers?
Yes, the guy you are responding to might have
thought it was OK, but that doesn't mean it was.
Fight the drift. If you must reply, see #1.
(4) If you still can't help yourself, do the next best
thing, a practice that has seems to have disappeared.
Reply with your marginal response, then add some
on-topic tidbit to at least give a little nourishment
to the list. "Obligatory classiccmp content: blah blah"
for example.
(5) Even if you ignore #1-#4, recognize subject drift and
change the subject line. The "scanning formats" thread,
which started on-topic, is now an umbrella for six
different (mostly off-topic) threads.
Yup, some of those off-topic threads had interesting content, but this
is not the forum for it. If you want to argue it, then imagine if
everyone who was into photography wanted to talk about interesting
techniques, or everyone interested in politics wanted to talk about
interesting power plays and developments, etc, etc.
My little question generated a lot more heat than I expected.
I will be going with my original ideal of using DOS with GEM as the
GUI. Too many acronyms there? A lot of software avaliable for DOS and
GEM provides a "different" shell. OS/2 sounds interesting, I have Warp
3 in a box somewhere, with many disc to install with, want to bet that
the last one or two would be bad?
I am already running Linux, Win XP, and WIN 2000 on other machines, home
and work.
Maybe I should have asked about a Laser 128 (Apple II clone) or maybe a
DecMate III?