Anyone know anything about Chorus Systemes and what they were up to
circa 1990? I'm just unravelling a lot of old internal Acorn
code/documentation and the name's cropping up quite a bit...
(I do recall using a distributed system called Chorus in the early 90's,
but I have no idea if that's at all related...)
ta
Jules
On Mar 7 2005, 10:35, Jules Richardson wrote:
> Oh to have a BT phone line (rather than an NTL one) so that I could
> change ISPs! (all ADSL vendors in the UK make it a condition of
service
> that you have to rent a BT phone line before you can use their
offering)
> </rant>
Don't some of the companies that do LLU (local loop unbundling) do it
even for a non-BT line?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 7 2005, 10:27, Jules Richardson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 18:43 -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > In the case of DEC, there are only two locks that I know of. One
is
> > an ACE (tubular key) lock; the other is a 3 or 4 pin flat key lock.
> > They have always been keyed alike since the beginning of time.
>
> I've yet to find anyone who can make (or even duplicate from
original) a
> tubular key though. (Which is annoying as it'd be nice to have a
backup
> for the steering wheel lock on my car! :)
One of the "while you wait" places in York can do tubulars, but only
when the boss is around as they claim it's trickier to get the depths
exactly right. They cut a DEC key for me and it wasn't right so they
re-made it. One of the better ironmongers near here can do various
keys, including, I think, tubulars. They've cut bike D-lock keys,
Mul-T-Lock security keys and various other odd ones for me.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Mar 7 2005, 10:48, Jules Richardson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 20:06 -0500, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> > Unfortunately, there has been this trend lately for multi-channel
> > digital O-scopes to be Windows-based.
>
> To me that implies that the company behind such beasts have no clue
what
> they're doing, given that alternatives exist that are far more robust
> and don't have licensing requirements that push the cost up.
Well, I won't claim that this refutes the above, but I know that some
Tek products have used W95/W98 for many years. One of the grooups in
CompSci rented a fancy digital scope/analyser some years ago
((1998-ish) and discovered it was running W95 underneath.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Cameron Kaiser" <spectre at floodgap.com>
>
>> I'd love to get some information on the memory and I/O
>> mapping. It expects to use particular printers so it would
>> be nice to rewrite the driver to work well with my 3SI.
>
>I wonder if anyone has tried to write an emulator. The Cat is getting a
>lot more attention after Raskin's passing.
>
>How easily could the Cat run arbitrary applications? Or was it an
>editor, always an editor, all the time (with goodies), the Forth mode
>notwithstanding?
>
Hi
Even in the Forth mode, it was still an editor. It is
a little hard to describe from this sense. You could pick
stuff with the select and then you execute it.
It would be hard to create a software only emulator.
The physical keyboard was as important as the software
on this machine. Talking with Jeff, he said that
several efforts have been made to get the keyboards on
PC to work but there are just too many variations on
how the keyboards are handled. It was left too much up to
the builder of the machines. You really need low level
access to key strokes and the layout is wrong as well.
Dwight
Anybody has extra electrical power and nowhere to burn it?
Or anybody trying to upgrade their central heating system?
Get it now! ;-)
http://tinyurl.com/6yqbv
/wai-sun
I changed two things on the list setup tonight.
1) To subscribe to the list (new subscribers, not you guys), requires not
only a confirmation email, but also list owner approval. I'm having way to
much trouble with "people?" joining the list and all their email immediately
bouncing. It gums up the speedy delivery for everyone else.
2) I changed the max time in queue for any message (outbound) to 35 minutes.
This means the server will try to send email to you once, then again 30
minutes later, and then it will just give up on you. It won't unsubscribe
you at that point, it takes like 7 days of bounces to get you unsubbed. But
it won't try to send you any given list post more than twice now. Same
reason as above.
For those sendmail inclined.... I considered setting up a secondary queue
for slow delivery where any emails that take longer than X time get moved to
a low priority queue. Quite frankly, I don't want to deal with it. I'd just
get more complaints about posts being out of order ;)
Jay
VCF wrote:
>>> http://www.siconic.com/computers/Swyft%20Apple%20IIe.jpg
>>> http://www.siconic.com/computers/Swyft%20Card.jpg
Ethan wrote:
>> Pretty slick... any idea what the LM311 and the PAL
>> do? Copy protection?
VCF wrote:
> I have no idea, and the man best suited to answer the
> question is gone now ;( I'm sure some documentation
> still remains. Bruce Damer of the DigiBarn might
> actually have some relevant stuff. And least of all,
> I'm pretty certain all of Jef's notes and such will be
> preserved.
Perhaps this fellow could provide some insight as well:
http://www.regnirps.com/resume.htm
Scroll down about half-way to the end of the page to read about his time &
involvement with Information Appliance, Inc.
Bonus: there's a way-cool photo of a Swyft prototype (in a plexi-glass
shell, no less) for the Canon Cat on this web page.
On Mar 3 2005, 0:12, Jay West wrote:
> I'll have to figure out what address my console card is.
The console on all PDP-11s is at the same place, 777560-777566 (add
"17" in front for a 22-bit system, though). The first word is the
receive control and status register (CSR), the next is the receive
buffer register, then the transmit CSR, and lastly the transmit buffer
register. So if you have a terminal connected, and with baud rate,
parity, and word size to match the M7800 settings, simply DEPositing a
value into 777566 should cause the corresponding ASCII character to
appear on your terminal. If you type a character on the terminal, it
should appear in the lowest 8 bits of 777562.
> However, if I have a unibus problem, isn't the M7800 which is in an
> SPC slot still going across the unibus?
Yes. But trying it will tell you if the problem is in the CPU drivers
or the memory buffers, for example.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
All the discussion on stacking two PC supplies and cutting
grounds to try and keep them isolated seems like asking
for trouble....
I've had good results using a PC-AT supply, and a little
homebuilt linear (and nicely transformer isolated) 12v
supply stacked on it's output to power an 8" drive. (The
12v supply is actually built on the outside of the cover
of the AT supply).
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html