I was looking at a not-very-old HP keyboard today and noticed that the
lettering on the keys is wearing away after only a few years of use.
Another corner quietly cut, I suppose.
Used to be that keytops were double-shot molded, with the lettering all but
indestructible. Is this a practice that's gone forever, or is there still
a vendor who makes keyboards the old way?
Cheers,
Chuck
Oh my heavens, I don't think I am any sort of expert, but will try to help.
Do you have a document for the controller card? If not, I will try to find
my copy.
Yes, most RLL drives can be formatted to lower capacity and used on a MFM
controller, but some aren't reliable when used that way. I don't know which
are.
What happens when you start the formatter in debug? Does it attempt the
format and light up the drive or fail immediately?
Do you have any other old PC or XT machines you can try this in? 1701 is a
generic hard disk failure code, but it could imply that the bios is set
incorrectly and just doesn't recognize the drive. Shouldn't stop you from
formatting it, but then again, perhaps you don't need to, maybe you need to
fix something else that is wrong. A cabling issue perhaps.
The reason I ask about another PC is that I seem to recall the PS2 needing
a diskette to configure it, whereas an XT or clone wouldn't.
-T
At 01:45 PM 12/21/2005 +0100, you wrote:
>Good morning Tom,
>
>I've just read a topic on the cctalk mailing list in which you seem to be
>en expert in old MFM/RLL disk drives.
>
>I get many troubles in trying to place a WD disk controller with a
>miniscribe 8438 disc. As many people do, I always get the famous 20 or
>1701 errors whan trying to low level format with the debug command, under
>MS dos (G=C800:5)
>
>
>I think i've been trying all that could be possible : removing jumpers,
>changing the WD driver card ... it never works. I've put another
>combination of MFM disk drive plus WD controller, and I obtained good
>results, so, it's not a problem with the computer, but certainly a problem
>of disk and/or controller.
>
>
>My controller is a WD1002A-WX1. I know it's for MFM disk, and I also know
>that the 8438 disc is a RLL, but it's said that it can also be formatted
>to 20Mbytes on a single WD MFM controller.
>
>The machine is IBM PS2 model 30. The 8438 is used to replace the old
>WDL-320 disk drive that doesn't work (it also sends the 1701 error code,
>butI don't know how to low-level format it..
>
>
>
>Many thanks if you can give me your help.
>
>I apologize for disturbing you.
>
>
>--... ...-- -.. . ..-. ..... .. -. .-..
>
>Frederic BOSSU, F5INL
>
[Pop Culture] Well, what would you do with a brain if you had one? --
Dorothy, The Wizard of Oz
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531
>List members,
> I reach the point that I need to decide what license I will use when
>I release my project. I myself do not have a preference. I am planning
>to replace the unknown-license 53C90 sample code with linux or NetBSD
>53C90 driver code. If I use the linux code, I have to release it with
>GPL. If I use the NetBSD code, I am not able to release it in GPL. I
>will let you guys decide, since you are the end users. To avoid
>flooding the mailing list, you can send me private email if you do not
>have a public message.
> When I release the project, only 512 B/B CDROM and HD will be
>supported. There might be a need to add support for other format
>CDROMs (easy) or SCSI tapes (difficult) or other devices down the
>road. Bear this in mind when you vote.
I would say use whatever license suits you the best. If you aren't
concerned about someone building a closed source product out of it,
BSD is fine. If you do have some concerns, LGPL is a good comprimise.
It allows people to link it with non-GPL code without allowing them
to close the source. If you want it, and any product linked with it
to be made open source, the GPL is the way to go. There are plenty of
shades in between.
Were I the developer in question, I would probably go with LGPL for a
driver or library and full GPL for a program. I've seen too much open
source work go into closed source products to use BSD license on my
code anymore. But YMMV. Choose what's best for you.
Eric
I'm foozling with a portable 386 system that keeps coming up with an
"Incorrect Setting In BIOS" error. I've replaced the battery and tried
the several DOS-based CMOS utilities from Simtel, but the error persists.
Part of the problem is that this is a Taiwanese clone and the
motherboard bears *no* manufacturer or model info. The only badging at
all is on the front, which says "LCD 386". It looks like a fairly
standard motherboard, has a Seagate ST-251 and a NewTronics DSDD 5.25"
floppy drive, 8-bit EGA (I think) graphics card with an internal
connector to a 640x240 mono LCD. The keyboard seems to be a regular AT
type, clips on the front of the case over the LCD. Dimensions are about
12" tall, 17-18" wide, and 9" front-to-back.
I've also never seen a system come up with BIOS messages from two
companies:
Phoenix 80386 ROM BIOS Version 3.06
Copyright (c) 1985,86 Phoenix Technologies Ltd
All Rights Reserved
CHIPS AND TECHNOLOGIES
AT/386 SYSTEM
SOFT SETUP VERSION 1.12
BANK 0 - 1024K NON INTERLEAVED 256k DRAM'S, 0 WAIT STATE MEMORY
BANK 1 - 1024K NON INTERLEAVED 256k DRAM'S, 0 WAIT STATE MEMORY
BANK 2 - DISABLED
BANK 3 - DISABLED
AT BUS CLOCK SOURCE - CLK2/2
I can't find any useful info on Google about the C&T "System Soft Setup".
My questions are, should I be trying to find a Phoenix setup utility
or a C&T util? Am I correct in thinking that's a disk-based utility,
rather than NVRAM? In other words, should I be hitting Ctrl+Alt+Ins or
something at boot? (Already tried that and all the usual suspects, no love.)
Any help or information would be appreciated.
Doc
OK, there are lots of sites that put things like mini and
microcomputers into their historical context with photos, hardware and
software descriptions, etc.
What is considered the best reference for mainframe like machines?
For instance, anyone want to bid on a Gould Concept/32?
<http://www.dovebid.com/assets/display.asp?ItemID=tbd155271>
Opening bid is $1.00, sale ends 12/30/06 from Boeing in St. Louis, MO.
Well, sounds *dirt* cheap to me, but I know f*ck all about Gould
computers other than the University of Utah bought one at one point in
the 90s. (I don't even know if they still have it.)
Suggestions anyone?
Comments on "DoveBid" are also welcome; I only found out about them
today.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>
I thought I would mention it to the list before posting it on ebay. I
need to go to the dentist in January.
I am going to part with my last IBM Mainframe 3084 chip. It is still
encased in its original Thermal Conduction Module.Chip looks similar
to this.
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/vintage/vintage_4506VV3121.html
The IBM 3084 mainframe is this:
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainframe/mainframe_PP3084.html
As a collectable I think the Thermal Conduction Module is much rarer
than the 4" chip. IBM classifies it as one of their most important
developments. The chips were saved or scrapped for their very high
gold content. The thermal modules were copper based with aluminum
plungers and quickly sent to scrap.
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/vintage/vintage_4506VV2137.html
Here is some information on the development of the Thermal Conduction Module.
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/mainframe/mainframe_intro3.html
This is a thermal Conduction Module that has never been opened. From
reading it is filled with helium so I have decided not to crack it
unless I absolutely have to for pictures. It came from a IBM 3084 we
scrapped in 1993 or 94.
The chip inside is similar to one I sold on ebay last month, pictures
in the ebay listing
would be similar to the chip inside this module.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8727630848
Asking $1200 domestic shipping included. Always open to offers.
Paxton
--
Paxton Hoag
Astoria, OR
USA
>--- Chris M wrote:
>
> 3.2 or .3 was available for the NEC APC III and the
>Rainbow (I think). I'm not absolutely sure the NEC
>version was APC III specific, though probably. The APC
>III had a compatibility board called the SLE (Software
>Library Expander). The thing I saw on ebay could have
>been vanilla ms-dos but I kind of doubt it.
MS-DOS 3.10b from Suitable Solutions is the last Rainbow MS-DOS
Version I know about (assuming you mean the DEC Rainbow). (There were
also CP/M, CCP/M, p-system (see ftp.update.se) and rumored Venix.)
--
- Mark
210-522-6025, temporary cell 240-375-2995
Hi, just in case anyone's interested, there are a number of VAXen on
<http://www.govliquidation.com> right now...
VAX Server 3500 Redstone Arsenal, AL
VAX 6000-420 Mechanicsburg, PA
VAX Server 5000-200 Fort Lewis, WA
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>