Wow. Thanks to the 10's (!!) of people who have offered to help me with
this! I still need to wade my way though all the replies :)
Anyway, I have had an offer for somebody who can go round there
personally. Hopefully the disks are not already stuffed so we can get a
copy of this previously-thought-lost game! I'll post an update on this
list when I know more.
I very much appreciate the great response!
Kieron Wilkinson
============================
Pareto Investment Management Limited is a Mellon Financial Company. Pareto Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (Firm Ref. No. 416024), and registered in England and Wales with Number 03169281. Registered Office: Mellon Financial Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4LA, United Kingdom. Pareto is the registered trademark of Pareto Investment Management Limited. This message may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorised. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator and then immediately delete this message.
>
>Subject: RE: 8" floppy system needed to recover old game data
> From: "Kieron Wilkinson" <Kieron.Wilkinson at paretopartners.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:33:53 +0100
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>
>Not sure if I repled to this... But anyway, I founf somebody who can do
>it, but thanks anyway!
>
>Kieron
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Guzis
>> Sent: 06 October 2005 16:53
>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>> Subject: RE: 8" floppy system needed to recover old game data
>>
>> If your customer will ship the media up the coast to Eugene,
>> OR, we'll do the conversion, no matter what the format is,
>> even if it isn't CP/M. Our fee depends on the number of diskettes.
>>
>> We've had a little experience at this. :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>============================
>Pareto Investment Management Limited is a Mellon Financial Company. Pareto Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (Firm Ref. No. 416024), and registered in England and Wales with Number 03169281. Registered Office: Mellon Financial Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4LA, United Kingdom. Pareto is the registered trademark of Pareto Investment Management Limited. This message may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorised. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator and then immediately delete this message.
>
Not sure if I repled to this... But anyway, I founf somebody who can do
it, but thanks anyway!
Kieron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Guzis
> Sent: 06 October 2005 16:53
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: RE: 8" floppy system needed to recover old game data
>
> If your customer will ship the media up the coast to Eugene,
> OR, we'll do the conversion, no matter what the format is,
> even if it isn't CP/M. Our fee depends on the number of diskettes.
>
> We've had a little experience at this. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
============================
Pareto Investment Management Limited is a Mellon Financial Company. Pareto Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (Firm Ref. No. 416024), and registered in England and Wales with Number 03169281. Registered Office: Mellon Financial Centre, 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4LA, United Kingdom. Pareto is the registered trademark of Pareto Investment Management Limited. This message may contain confidential and privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorised. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator and then immediately delete this message.
FYI to all you Aussies...see below.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:49:07 +1000
From: "John Geremin, Computer Engineer." <geremin at iprimus.com.au>
Reply-To: VCF-OZ at yahoogroups.com
To: VCF-OZ at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [VCF-OZ] ACMS: Dispersal Day at Homebush.
Greetings friends,
The President has decided that there is to be a Dispersal Day at
the Australian Computer Museum Society storage shed at Homebush
(due to lack of financial support from State or Federal governments).
Items - include Hardware, Software, Media, Documentation, Furniture.
Place - Rear, 6 Parramatta Road, HOMEBUSH, 2140.
Entry via Columbia Lane, [next to Kennards Self Storage]
Time - approx 9am to 4pm, Date - Sunday, 16th October, 2005
Prices - starting at $1 - all reasonable offers considered.
Bring - your own transport and muscle power for moving items.
Regards, John G.
John GEREMIN, Ph 02-9758 5686 or 0427 10 20 60
note: new E-MAIL address geremin at iprimus.com.au
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Australian COMPUTER MUSEUM Society Inc. ABN 89 972 080 502.
Looking for a site for 'A Working Australian Computing Museum'.
http://www.acms.org.au/ my mobile: 0427 10 20 60
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My web page http://home.iprimus.com.au/geremin/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13 - Release Date: 09-Oct-05
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/S_NqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VCF-OZ/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
VCF-OZ-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:53:00 -0400
>From: "Joe Stevenson" <ikvsabre at comcast.net>
>I have 16 30-pin simms left over from various past incarnations of
>my PCs, and I'm
> trying to figure out what I've got.
> I no longer have a motherboard to test them, so I have no idea what is what.
>
>Is there any not-to-painless way to figure out what I've got?
Not all that painless, but the only way I know that works...
Take a SIMM. Count the number of chips. Find the model markings on
one of the chips. There are usually two or three lines of writing on
a chip. One of these will be a date or batch code and is irrelevant.
The line you want will start with a one, two or three (usually two)
character manufacturer code (e.g., K or KM for Samsung, TC for
Toshiba, M(numeral)M for Mitsubishi, HM or HN for Hitachi, etc.),
followed by some longish, about four to eight, alphanumeric code
which is mostly numerals, then a dash or space and a speed number in
nanoseconds, which may or may not have the trailing zero truncated.
For example: HM5116400BS-8, MSM511000C-7, KM44C16100B-5, TC514400AJ-6.
Then go to a datasheet archive such as
<http://www.datasheetarchive.com/> and enter the part number in the
search field. It often helps to truncate the trailing characters
back to the first number in the body. E.g. HM5116400, MSM511000,
KM44C16100, etc.
The datasheet will tell you the capacity and organization of the
chip. For example, a 1 MB 30 pin SIMM with eight chips on it will be
composed of 1M X 1 chips. These have one million addresses with 1
bit at each address. Eight of them working in parallel provide 1
million addresses with eight bits at each address or 1 megabyte.
Multiply the total capacity of the chip by the number of chips on the
SIMM. Remember that you're working with bits here, not bytes.
Divide by 8 and you've got the capacity in megabytes--except...
Some SIMMs are parity SIMM and they are based on 9 bits of data
rather than 8 bits of data, so you'll need to divide that capacity by
9, not by eight for a parity SIMM. A 30 pin parity SIMM will have
nine or three chips instead of eight or two, so they're fairly easy
to identify.
However, a three chip 30 pin SIMM will have two chips with a certain
capacity and a third chip with 1/4 the capacity or either of the
other two. In this case, calculate the total capacity of the two
larger chips and divide by eight. Or find the capacity in bits of
one big chip and divide by four.
In most cases, if the SIMM has eight or nine chips, then the capacity
in bytes is equal to the number of addresses any of the chips
supports (see the datasheet). If the SIMM has three chips, then the
capacity in bytes is still equal to the number of address which any
of the three chips supports.
For example, you find a three chip SIMM with two 4M X 4 chips and one
4M X 1 chip on board. The capacity of this SIMM is 4MB or 4
Megabytes. You find a SIMM with eight or nine 4M X 1 chips on board,
its capacity is also 4MB.
The real trick is figureing out the capacity of the chips from the
markings on them. Google searches sometimes help, but often (almost
always) just lead you to chip distributers spamming the search engine
space with part numbers to lead part searches to their sites. They
often don't even have the chip in question, and rarely have any
useful information available on their website.
SIMMs that can steer you wrong are composite SIMMs where groups of
smaller capacity chips are used to build a higher capacity SIMM. For
example, building a 16 MB 30 pin SIMM out of eight 4M X 4 chips.
These are rare and should be easily identified because there should
be a non-memory chip on board to handle the address translations.
Jeff Walther
One for the US members... any idea of a good usenet resource for
questions relating to US wiring / electrics? (I'm thinking an equivalent
to uk.d-i-y)
We've got a cable decoder box here that trips out the house breakers
when plugged into certain outlets - irrespective of whether it's via a
surge protector (probably not surprising there) or of what other loads
might be sharing the same wiring to that outlet.
It works fine in other outlets though, which seems like a strange
problem - but I have no idea how US houses are wired (and the wiring in
this place is ancient anyway!)
Be nice to get it sorted out as the cable box currently requires a cable
trailing across the lounge from an outlet in another room!
cheers
Jules
From: Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk>
>Would Xenix likely even run in the 1MB of the BBC Micro's 32016 copro? I
>can believe it'd be usable on the 4MB of the ACW, but might be pushing
>it a bit in 1MB.
Xenix would certainly run in 1MB of memory. That is...at least on the i286 (512K was the minimum when I was subjected to Xenix). As I recall, it ran in even less on the 8086. On the Tandy 16 (68000), I *think* it ran in 256K, but please don't hold me to that. I understand that it also ran on the z8000, but I never saw that.
I don't recall ever seeing that Xenix was ported to the 32016 for any machine. BSD4 was, of course, among other Unixen of dubious lineage. Considering the bugs, it's amazing any of them worked.
Of course...why you would want to run Xenix on something other than a PoS system, other than to say you did, is a bit beyond me...;-)
>As the subject implies, I've got a PCjr with a floppy drive that is having
>trouble reading disks and fails the internal CTRL-ALT-INS diagnostics.
>Symptoms include a very loud/bad noise at first seek (rest of seeks sound ok),
A failed track-0 detector can cause a drive to make loud noises at first
seek, and to misalign on subsequent track accesses - if the drive hits the
physical stop before the track-0 sensor trips, then the head will "rattle"
against the stop until the controller gives up trying (usually around 77-80
steps). If the physical setup of the drive is such that the stepper is able
to "make a step" past track-0 in this case, the alignment for subsequent
accesses will be off as well.
>Another related question: When I was first getting started with personal
>computers 25 years ago, I seem to recall that track alignment was a common
>problem and could be fixed by using a calibration diskette and special software
>that you could monitor as you turned the alignment screw. Without one of those
>factory calibration diskettes, is it even possible to align/calibrate a floppy
>drive for track alignment?
You can't do a proper job of drive alignment without an alignment disk and a
scope.
As with most things, there are fine to not-so-fine lines between "proper" and
"passable". I've built a Align/Test function into ImageDisk which will let you
do a reasonable job of track-to-track alignment of the drive to a known good
disk (alignment is at best only as good as the disk you are using).
With a known good disk in the drive (I would suggest using a factory original
diskette from a high-profile software vendor, or a disk freshly formatted on
a NEW high-quality drive):
- Run ImageDisk, select the drive etc. and execute the A)lign/Test function.
- Step out the middle of the disk. 'S2' will step to track 20.
- Execute 'A'nalyze. This will identify the format of the track, which will
be displayed at the top of the screen.
- ImageDisk will continue reading the track, and will beep at about a 2hz rate,
with a tone which is 500hz + 100hz for every unique sector which it reads
that matches the cylinder id of the track you have stepped to. It will also
show counts of matching and non-matching cylinder sectors.
- If your disk is far out of alignment, you may need to start at the inside
or outside edge to get matching sectors. In really bad cases you may need
to fiddle with the drive alignment in order to get to this point.
- Once you are reading sectors, listing to the audible tones while slowly
adjusting the position of the head will allow you to determine the limits
of where the head can read the track without taking your eyes off of it.
Set the position to the 1/2 way point between these limits.
- Repeat on inner and outer tracks, working toward the best compromise that
you can achieve.
- To adjust the track-0 switch, use 'Z'ero (recalibrate) and '+' (step out)
to move the head back and forth between track-0 and track-1 at each track
ImageDisk will beep as described above, and display a running count of the
matching and non-matching sectors read from the tracks. When the sensor is
set correctly, the counts will be correct (all matching, no non-matching)
and the head will perform a single step in each direction, without banging
against the stop.
- If the head "rattles" against the stop on 'Z', move the track-0 sensor
slightly toward the center of the disk.
- If the head does not step out to track-0 on 'Z', then move the track-0
sensor slightly away from the center of the disk.
The adjustments are interrelated, in that the drive has to find track-0
before it can reliably seek to any track - some going back and forth is
to be expected (you get MUCH better at it after having done it a few
times).
Nowhere near as good as using a proper alignment disk, however I have used
variations of this technique a number of times on drives that have worked
reliably for many years afterward. As always, your mileage may vary.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
> On Sat, October 8, 2005 6:32 pm, Pete Hollobon said:
>> Does anyone know if Xenix / Unix were ever available on the NS 16032
>> second
>> processor for the BBC micro? I remember reading that it was intended to be
>> made available in the user's guide years ago.
> It was supposed to be an option for the Cambridge Workstation since that
> also had a 16032/32016 2nd processor but I don't know if it ever made it
> into the wild. Graham Toal's the man who'll know I suspect, also Paul
> Williams (if he's around) and Jules R.
To the best of my recollection this was only ever talked about but
never implemented by anyone at Acorn. If it was done externally I
have no knowlege of it. I was one of the 3 or 4 people who argued
in favour of us selling the systems with Unix but Acorn was very much
a 'not invented here' company. I think way back then there were
also significant costs associatated with licensing Unix, plus there
were few ports to archiectures other than Vax and 68000.
While we're on the subject of the NS processor... A couple of years ago
I got in touch with Peter Robertson, the author of Acorn's compilers for
that system (Pascal, C and Imp77) in the hope of getting the source of
the compiler from him. Unfortunately he had not kept a copy of that code
generator. I vaguely remember that there were sources escrowed somewhere
at the time. Obviously the escrow will be long gone, but on the vague
offchance that someone from Acorn retained a copy... does anyone have the
source code for that compiler? (Really just the back-end Icode to
binary Pass3, but _anything_ anyone has is wanted for the Edinburgh
Computer History Project!)
By the way I have copies of quite a few binaries for this platform.
Has anyone ever written an emulator for this architecture? I haven't
found one. It ought to be an easy one to write, it was a very regular
instruction set. My guess for why there isn't one is that it was
never a very popular chip, but that hasn't stopped emulators being
written for lots of other obscure architectures! I can imagine that
it wouldn't take much more than just a basic instruction set emulator
to make Panos live again, as the I/O could be done by emulating an
I/O processor Beeb and the tube chip. There must be several Beeb
emulators around that can handle second processors to which we
could graft a NS emulator?
I think somewhere I have a paper listing of Mark Taunton's linker
for Panos. It was a very well written piece of code. I think it
was Acorn's only piece of Panos code (except for the compilers
themselves) that was written in Imp77. Everything else was in
Modula II. I also recently discovered Keith Rautenbach's & my
editor for Panos, the one which was a sort of EMACS-alike written
in ModII with a built-in mock LISP. I have all the sources *except*
the LISP init files needed to start it up :-( Also, the editor shot
some code over to the IO processor when it was invoked, which did some
extended keystroke handling - that part I do have...
A small aside: when I built my 6809 second processor for the Beeb,
while I was waiting for the chips to arrive I wrote a 6809 emulator
that ran on the 16032, written in Imp77. It was faster than the
real chip! Also it was my first emulator. I wrote it on a 32016 2nd
proc that was on a Beeb with one of the early experimental Winchester
disks. Of course the disk died, - about 2 days after I finished
the emulator - and the backup floppy was corrupt and the only source
I had was on paper. I was too depressed to key it all in again
(and the paper listing was about a week from the final version)
and what's worse I lost the paper listing along with *all* my
historical computing papers when I emigrated from the UK to the
US 10 years ago :-/ Anyway, moral of this story was that it was
a very early wake-up call for me on the value of backups :-) Ever
since then I have always had two hard drives containing everything
I've ever written, with one of them offline so they don't both
get taken out by the same lightning strike! I am so glad that
disk drives are getting bigger faster than I can fill them - I've
always been able to keep everything I've ever done and just move
it over to the latest biggest drive when it becomes cheap enough
to afford. I saw 500Gb hitachi drives at $260 today so I'm thinking
it's time to migrate again :-)
Graham
PS Joe Rigdon, the US Beeb you loaned me will be sent out in tomorrow's
mail. Thanks very much for letting me use it!