test-drb October 2005

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

264 participants
655 discussions

by vcf＠siconic.com

Is anyone interested in a Teletype ASR32 with paper and paper tape? Unknown working condition but in decent physical condition. Comes with some rolls of printout paper and paper tape. Most likely pick-up only in NYC. I'll explain why if you're interested and you e-mail me. Asking price is $100 (might be negotiable). Please contact me off-list for details. P.S. Another ASR33 sold on eBay for $730(!) -- Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org [ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ] [ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]

19 years, 1 month

PDP-8/A Front Panels

by Steven_R_Hutchins＠Raytheon.com

http://www.protoexpress.com/ I have used them for years. excellent product, great price, fast turn, small quantity OK |---------+-----------------------------> | | "vrs" | | | <vrs at msn.com> | | | Sent by: | | | cctech-bounces at cla| | | ssiccmp.org | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2005 02:19 | | | PM | | | Please respond to | | | "General | | | Discussion: | | | On-Topic Posts | | | Only" | | | | |---------+-----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> | | cc: | | Subject: Re: PDP-8/A Front Panels | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| From: "steve" <gkicomputers at yahoo.com> > --- Vince Slyngstad <v.slyngstad at verizon.net> wrote: > > Charles Morris and I have been working to create an > > equivalent for the KC8A > > Nice, generally though the demand for something is > much greater if you actually have it ready to ship (in > case your preorder responses are low, don't get > discouraged). Thanks! > Looks like your front panel and parts cost are > constant with quantity, but your pc board drops > greatly with quantity. If I were you I would just > order 20 or so pc boards and let the buyers order the > parts and panel separately (as needed, some buyers may > not want the panel, others may already have most of > the parts). The problem with that is that it forces us to front hundreds of dollars, with no indication that we'll ever get it back. I already have boards sitting around from several projects, representing hundreds of dollars of investment on my part, that may never "sell" (even at cost). It is a lot better for us to have some idea of the demand, so we can mitigate how much "over-investment" we want to do. Though you are right, that if we found someone who would pick up the overhead cost of a board order ($200 each time), we would be way ahead. (Anyone know of a shop that can do a double-sided 16" board with solder mask and without a steep setup charge?) The other major ticket item for this project is the front plate. Anyone know where we can get those done inexpensively? Vince

19 years, 1 month

FPGA VAX update

by bqt＠Update.UU.SE

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, "Peter C. Wallace" <pcw at mesanet.com> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Tim Shoppa wrote: > > > Getting back to FPGA's, I know of a couple FPGA implementations of > > PDP-11's. (They are mostly KDJ11 clones, but they differ in a couple > > of tiny respects.) With extreme effort in the late 90's, they managed > > to make 4 FPGA's be about a factor of 2 factor on most benchmarks than > > a 11/93. And the PDP-11 is much easier to implement than a VAX. > > By the time the FPGA implementations made it to market the PC-based > > emulators were so much more cost-effective for most applications > > (despite their warts of running under a host OS...) > > > > I suspect that a FPGA implementation of a VAX would have a > > performance about equal to a 11/780 if done by an average Joe. > > Someone with much experience in caching/pipelining could probably > > eek out a factor of 2x or 3x by pulling out all the tricks in the > > book. > > > > Tim. > > > > Well since its pretty easy to get microcode to run at 75-100 MHz or so in > current cheap FPGAs, I'd say that 10 X a 780 should be trivial... I'd say that's wrong. Considering that the VAX8650 microcode engine runs at 68 MHz and manages about 7 times the 11/780, you're optimistic. The 8650 have a very large microcode word, actually have three (or was it four?) microcode engines running in parallell, and some very advanced cacheing and pipelining to speed it up to get even that far. Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

19 years, 1 month

FlashManager 2000

by kelly＠catcorner.org

> So... My search comes right back here. Does anyone happen to > have a copy of Flash Manager? Sorry for the multiple replies, but there are: >From http://www.smartm.com/product/m_tech.cfm a reference to: ftp://cust-ftp.smartm.com/Public/memcard.inf and From: http://www.magicram.com/FAQFlash.htm Q. Why won't my Linear Flash card work under Windows 2000? A. Linear Flash Cards do not come with drivers, it has always been the OS vendor's responsibility to include support for these devices. Unlike previous versions of Windows, the Flash drivers traditionally included on Windows distributions are not included with Windows 2000. The following information explains a work around to get Windows 2000 to recognize and use Linear Flash Cards. Be certain Windows 2000 has been upgraded with at least Service Pack 1 and the host hardware supports PC Cards. OEM installed Windows 2000 should not exhibit problems, but systems upgraded from older Windows versions may need confirmation that their hardware is compatible. Please note that MagicRAM provides this work around as a customer service and does not guarantee that will work with every system configuration. 1. During the Windows 2000 hardware setup process choose Display a list of known drivers... instead of Search for a suitable driver... 2. Select the category Memory technology driver 3. Select the M-Systems DiskOnChip2000 driver from listed manufacturer M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers 4. Click Yes on the Update Driver Warning message, continue and click Finish to complete the setup process, click No from the restart Windows message 5. Access the Device Manager and highlight M-Systems DiskOnChip2000 from the category Memory technology driver (it has the conflict symbol) 6. Access the M-Systems DiskOnChip2000 and click Update Driver from the Driver tab 7. Choose Display a list of known drivers... instead of Search for a suitable driver... when the options appear 8. You should now have more default driver options, select the Centennial PCMCIA Memory Card driver from listed manufacturer Centennial Technologies, Inc. (other drivers may work, but the Centennial driver was used successfully in testing) 9. Click Yes on the Update Driver Warning message, continue and click Finish to complete the setup process, click Ok from the properties window then Yes >from the restart Windows message 10. When Windows restarts, you should see a new drive letter and icon from "My Computer" or Windows Explorer

19 years, 1 month

FlashManager 2000

by kelly＠catcorner.org

> So... My search comes right back here. Does anyone happen to > have a copy of Flash Manager? > Not a lot of help, but see: http://www.systemsoft.com/l-2/l-3/20010320_fm.htm Kelly

19 years, 1 month

installing new ethernet address equipment with VMS 6.1

by Rinaldo.Eversdijk＠stork.com

Does anyone know how to install, on a alpha computer (DEC3000) running with VMS version 6.1 software, the same equipment with a new Ethernet address? Gr. Rinaldo -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachment(s) sent with it are intended exclusively for the addressee(s), and may not be used by, opened by, passed on to, or made available for use to, any person other than the addressee(s). Stork rules out any and all liabilities resulting from any electronic transmission.

19 years, 1 month

Unibus SCSI (was: Any own an 11/725...?)

by bqt＠Update.UU.SE

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote: > Ethan Dicks wrote: > > If anyone has a spare RC25 cart or two, I wouldn't mind picking one > > up... it's likely to be cheaper than a Unibus SCSI interface. ;-) > > Is there such a thing as a Unibus SCSI? Certainly. Several actually. CMD made the CMD 720/722, which was both disk and tape. Very good controller. I have one. Viking made a controller, and I believe Emulex also made one. There were probably one or two other manufacturers as well. Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

19 years, 1 month

Wondering which OS to use (PDP-8/A)

by bqt＠Update.UU.SE

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, "Martin Bishop" <mjd.NO.bishop.SPAM at iee.org> wrote: > QUOTE The 8/A cannot have an EAE UNQUOTE > > Don't think this is correct. Because, such a machine would have no serious > (integer) arithmetic capability. Speaking of integer arithmetic capability: the 8/A systems where you wanted better numeric crunch were expected to be fitted with the FPP8A, which can do both integer and FP stuff, and does it much better. (One of the options I'd like to find to play with, but haven't...) Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

19 years, 1 month

Wondering which OS to use (PDP-8/A)

by bqt＠Update.UU.SE

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, "Martin Bishop" <mjd.NO.bishop.SPAM at iee.org> wrote: > QUOTE The 8/A cannot have an EAE UNQUOTE > > Don't think this is correct. Because, such a machine would have no serious > (integer) arithmetic capability. Also, the PDP 8/A Minicomputer Handbook > 1976/77 has a lengthy section [pp9-56 .. 9-65] on the KE8-E (Extended > Arithmetic Element : EAE). However, the "PDP-8 Summary of Models and > Options" (posted by Doug Jones) indicates that the EAE can be fitted iff the > PDP-8/E CPU boardset is fitted. That is PDP-8/A models 600/620 were fitted > with the KK8E CPU and optionally the 8/E EAE. And, I imagine "field > specials" were doubtless built. > > Another wrinkle; correction invited. As I said, some 8/A systems were fitted with 8/E CPUs. It's actually almost on the verge of terminology confusion. I should probably have written explicitly that it's the KK8A that cannot have an EAE, while the KK8E can. However, there are no "field specials". The KK8A simply cannot have an EAE. Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

19 years, 1 month

Any own an 11/725...?

by bqt＠Update.UU.SE

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> wrote: > On 10/23/05, Johnny Billquist <bqt at update.uu.se> wrote: > > You'll probably hate me for telling that I threw an 11/730 away less than > > a year ago. > > But it was in Sweden, and I doubt anyone would want to pay for the > > shipping. > > I would have been happy to pay shipping for the CPU boards. I might have those still around (hate to throw things). Let me check... Oh, and remind me in a week or three. ;-) Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

19 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
66
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb October 2005