I have a few IBM model 5150s that I use to code entries for programming
competitions and I'd like to try to speed up the hard disk in any way possible.
(If you're curious what my last project was, check out
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=13722 to download and try it out -- it
displays full-screen full-motion color video with sync'd sound -- yes, on a
4.77MHz 8088, no fooling). I've been looking for any way to speed up the hard
disk subsystem (currently WD1002 with Seagate ST225) and I simply can't get
more than 130KB/s out of the darn thing... so:
- Is there any MFM/RLL 8-bit ISA controller that can read disks at their full
1:1 interleave? If so, where can I get one? 3:1 is the best I've been able to
get using the above MFM combination. I haven't tried RLL yet because I don't
have any RLL controllers.
- If not, do such things exist as 8-bit ISA IDE controllers? I have lots of
"little" IDE drives (320MB and 540MB models) that I could hook up.
I attempted not one but TWO 8-bit Plus hardcards (both 40MB models), thinking
that the embedded drive/controller combo would be better, but my experience
with Plus Hardcards (even the 16-bit 120MB versions) is that, after about 8
years, the damn EEPROM forgets everything and it doesn't boot (no BIOS, get a
1701 "controller error"). So I couldn't get either of them to work. (As a
result I have 4 Plus hardcards that I am *this close* to throwing away, unless
someone has an idea of reviving them :-)
Any advice? Or should I just try to find an EMS board and cache my data
instead? (Speaking of which, does anyone have a LIM EMS board for sale/trade?
Can't seem to find one of those either.)
--
Jim Leonard (trixter(a)oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Want to help an ambitious games project? http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
At 14:43 06/01/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>Several people asked me for copies of the Olivetti Programma 101
>manual - I have scanned the better of the two manuals that I have,
>and placed the scan at:
>
> http://www.dunfield.com/pub/olpro101.pdf
>
>Regards,
>Dave
Btw - just in case it is not obvious - the last two pages of the scan
are NOT from the manual - these are scans of the two different "programming
worksheet" pads that I have.
Regards,
Dave
--
dave04a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.parse.com/~ddunfield/museum/index.html
Hi
Does anyone have a working UDA-50 board set with the "over the top"
jumpers they would be willing to part with?
(or while I'm asking, an RA-81 HDA? :-)
(this is a unibus disk controller for the non-dec folks)
i have one in my vax and I'd like to have another for my 11/44.
-brad
>From: "Tom Jennings" <tomj(a)wps.com>
>
>>> "Binary reads from a device are not
>>> allowed" is the message at 8753 in DR-DOS 3.41.
>
>On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
>
>> The question I haven't seen answered yet is, "Well, why the hell not???"
>
>The real answer is: there is no out-of-band signalling, so one of
>the 128 in-band symbols (SUB, 26 decimal) is chosen to mean "END
>OF FILE". It's borrowed from CP/M-80; I don't know where DR got
>it; it seems un-DEC-ish.
>
>("Out of band" signalling is, for RS-232 et al, the hardware
>handshake lines. No one likes them, everyone complains like
>babies, so they have essentially been deprecated.)
>
Hi
In the past when I wanted a non-block binary transfer,
I often had some value that I used as an escape character.
I'd choose a low frequency value to improve throughput.
It is simple, If you want to send a command value, you
send the escape character, first. If you just wanted the escape
character, you'd send it twice. For 8 bit data, you
had 255 commands. EOF could be one of those.
It makes a simple protocol that is easy to implement in
code.
Dwight
Hello PDP-11 addicts :~)
I finished the scan of some 130+ XXDP listings into PDF's.
Al has provided the webspace on bitsavers at
www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/XXDP
If you are looking for a specific XXDP, bitsavers is great,
but if you want to have them all in your collection you might
consider asking me in a private e-mail. All XXDP listings are
totalling your download to approx 670 Mb ... For a small fee,
depending the shipping costs, I could burn a CD-ROM ...
-- that is, if nobody objects to this approach --
kind regards,
- Henk, PA8PDP.
I'd like to obtain the following spares for my SGI Onyx IR system. If you
have any or all of the boards below available, please contact me off list.
SGI Part No. Description
--------------------------------------------------
030-0683-004 RM6-16 raster manager (16Mb TRAM)
030-0684-004 RM6-64 raster manager (64Mb TRAM)
030-0681-003 GE12-4 geometry engine
Cheers,
Lyle
--
Lyle Bickley
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
This consists of an IDXCS-100T S-100 controller and a D6410 tape drive. Also
programming manual and CP/M-86 software. It is pretty heavy. As usual, price
is $0 plus shipping or you pick up in Gloucester, MA.
Dan Lanciani
ddl(a)danlan.*com
if they allowed it, then they had to support it... It was easier to prevent it then deal with the untold support calls because people didn't know what they were doing. Connecting machines by RS232 was never easy in the early days. I worked for Applied Microsystems and had to connect emulators to a variety of computer systems in the 80s and every one was a pain. Imagine IBM tech support dealing with that too.
As for Traveling Software, seeing how I worked for them for five years, I don't recall any buyout attempts from Microsoft. Traveling did go through hard times and it still around but not as they were back in the 90s. They could never get the LapLink name associated with Traveling Software and they finally changed the company name to LapLink. They made a great remote control product that was more reliable that PC Anywhere, but LapLink was a file transfer utility and the recognition as another form of product was never successful.
As for the last topic, my comment stands. I really don't care where MS gets stuff. They have unfortunately destroyed a lot of companies along the way by assimilation or outright destruction.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)siconic.com>
Sent: Jan 6, 2005 3:05 PM
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Importing binary files without removable storage nor non-bundled software (was: TKermitFTP
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Steve Thatcher wrote:
> the only reason Microsoft would not add binary transfer capability as an
> integral part of early DOS is that the people that needed it were in a
> small minority. It made no business sense to include features that they
> believed that most people really didn't need. Later in DOS, they did
What? It seems to me they had to do more programming work to prevent
binary copying to the serial port.
> include a basic file transfer capability over a cable. Probably more out
> of pressure because people used products like LapLink and complained
> that they had to buy something instead of having it built in. It was
Actually, it was because Laplink showed there was a market for such a
product, and in true MS style they probably tried to buy LL, were
rebuffed, and then came up with their own (inferior) built-in version to
try to suck the life out of Traveling Software and make them go bankrupt.
It didn't work in this (rare) case.
> I have long held the concept that Microsoft has always been a 90%
> solution and the remaining 10% are the opportunities for outside
> companies.
More like 10% original work and 90% acquisitions/destruction-by-co-optation
of other companies.
(I sense the possibility of another thread of MS bashing coming on...)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival