Ok, I'm going to surprise everyone and ask a
question about a non-DEC item. Does anyone here
have an HP 7200A plotter that they would like to
get rid of? These were used in the 1970s.
Ashley
P.S. Even though it's a non-DEC thing, we used to
have one connected to our PDP-11/40. I can't seem
to find many references to these on Google or
anywhere else.
I found EK-KDJ1A-UG-001 "KDJ11-A CPU Module User's Guide,"
which might help, because unless my memory fails me, the KDJ
= 11/73.
I didn't immediately find power-up codes in it -- probably
because something like MXV11-B2 or other ROM set issues the
codes.
If I can find an MXV11 doc, I'll post a message. I used to
have one.
Contact me if you want the KDJ11 manual.
runtime(a)wzrd.com
DM
"David V. Corbin" <dvcorbin(a)optonline.net> wrote:
> As shown by the above quote, there is a strong anti "PeeCee" bias by many
> here.[...]
but this forum centers on variance, if everything is the same, what is the
point of discussing/preserving it.
The differences/peculiarities/innovations exhibited by many of the old
machines make them so fascinating. If you give me a 20 year old PC,
it will take me no time to setup it up with DOS and even networking.
But what would be the point, I can do the same thing in a VMware
window on my Linux workstation.
The neat thing about the old machines is that it takes for ever to set
them up and this is what's so intriguing about them. I remember a
posting (not in this forum), about a guy who got an old IBM 360
mainframe working. He said that once it was working there wasn't much
to do with it.
> IF the computer industry had remained with a large number of completely
> different hardware/software environments which required trained operators
> for even the most basic operations, then computing would not have become a
> household commodity.
> [...]
> Standardization of both hardware and software HAD TO HAPPEN, if computers
> were to become the commodity they are today.
I am afraid that computing standardised too early causing everybody to
get locked into a technology that is too clunky. Microsoft's "innovation"
essentially boils down to two things:
a) adding useless junk to their already bloated platforms, and
b) adding "essential" applications (e.g. Web, or audio) to their
base platform so as to dictate the standards and eliminate
competition.
This strategy, although excellent for Microsoft, is to the detriment of
everybody else.
I have PCs running windows because I must, but I don't need the latest
and greatest Microsoft offering, I am running Windows NT4.0 with Office
95 (which btw will soon be covered by the 10 year boundary :-). I will
soon have to move to something more recent mainly because vendors do
not support Windows NT, so I will not have the drivers to run Windows
NT on my new hardware. PC hardware *is* a commodity, but never be fooled
into thinking that Windows software is also a commodity.
**vp
Crisis Computer in San Jose has the equipment to write CE packs.
They aren't going to be cheap. I'm guessing $300 to $500.
They are probably the only place in the world left that has the
gear to do this.
Realigning 2315 heads isn't something you want to do if you don't
absolutlely HAVE to, since you run the risk of making the packs
that you have unreadable, if they were written on drives that are
off spec.
-------------------
I believe I have to consider this. I have no packs with any data on
them that I need. They were all just data packs with automotive
parts in inventory and such. I cleaned a pack and loaded it into
my RK05 drive zero and it would not pass the read/write test. I don't
remember what happened when I tried to use drive 1. I believe it failed but in a different manner. I thought if at least one drive
was working I'd be Ok for awhile. I am not sure if I want to spend
$300-$500 on trying to get a CE pack that may not help me if my drive
is failing for some other reason than alignment.
_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
>From: "der Mouse" <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca>
>
>>> Again, I'm thinking in terms of vacuum tubes, and I can't see how
>>> losing the knowledge of how they worked is going to affect the
>>> future, or even the present for that matter.
>> I'm guessing that there is at least one piece of equipment in your
>> house that relies on a vacuum tube to opperate that is not some sort
>> of display device.
>
>Aside from legacy electronics (I have some pre-transistor-era equipment
>lying around), for which transistor versions exist, I can't think of
>any. The only thing I'm not sure of is the microwave oven - does the
>microwave-generation-thingy depend on vacuum?
Hi
You see, knowledge already lost. Yes, a magnetron has a vacuum in it.
It has a filament and a plate ( with cavities in it ). While the
principles of these things can be found in books, much of the
mechanical and physical methods used to create these things is lost.
Partly because of the fact that manufactures don't tell all and
partly because no one is dealing with these kinds of things.
While it is claimed that the information is in books, there
are some feel things that rarely seem to make it into these
books. Can anyone tell me what controls the gain of a vacuum
tube ( other than someone that actually worked with these )?
Can anyone tell me how the grids must be placed for an electrometer
preamp tube and why? While we don't need these kinds of things today,
the knowledge of what makes these things work is still quite
valuable. This understanding can keep us from making mistakes
with other related problems. I can't say that these specific
things that I've mentioned will be the most important things
to remember but these are the types of tidbits that make
the difference when looking into new problem areas of the
future.
Those that understand these things will always be in demand.
Those that think they can ignore these kinds of things will
wonder why things are beyond understanding. This goes
for the entire range of things. You can't understand how
to think about things without actually thinking about things.
Dwight
Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)siconic.com> wrote:
> It would be neat to know how the Egyptians built the pyramids, but we have
> cranes and stuff for that today, so even if we knew their methods, is it
> really practical to teach them in engineering school?
No modern cranes or other machinery can come even close to building
the 3 Orion pyramids on the Giza plateau or the Baalbek stone platform
in the mountains of Lebanon. The only technology that can build such
structures is antigravity, which is how they were actually built.
Yes, get this, technology was more advanced many thousands of years ago
than it is today. Devolution is all around us. The devolution of the
past 20 y or so that Tony and others lament is merely a continuation of
the devolution that has been going on for the past 4000 years, ever since
the year 2024 BCE when our cosmic ancestors and teachers, the Anunnaki,
were overthrown and forced off this planet by the dark extraterrestrial
reptilian race I call Yahwists, who are the force behind Judeo-Xtianity
(the "God" entity is actually them, those galactic criminals).
This tragedy occurred because of a security hole in the ancient computer
systems of Anunnaki (to bring this on topic). The Yahwists managed to
introduce a virus into Anunnaki's central command mainframe at their
NOC on Mt. Moriah (which became Jerusalem centuries later) and generated
commands to launch their nuclear missiles against their major cities
(including Sodom and Gomorrah), their spaceport in the Sinai peninsula,
and their key technological base on Mt. Katherine. The destruction was
complete when the Jewish horde (with Yahweh's UFO flying overhead) overran
Jericho. Legendary records of this lost Golden Age remained in the
Library of Alexandria, but the Christians took care of that.
Oh, and the Giza pyramid complex is NOT ~4500 years old as commonly
believed. It is actually about 12500 y old, if not more. The 3 pyramids
are arranged exactly as the belt stars of Orion: Zeta Orionis, Epsilon
Orionis and Delta Orionis. The Great Pyramid is not the Pyramid of Cheops
or Khufu, it's the pyramid of Zeta Orionis. The catch, however, that the
astronomical alignments in the Giza complex (yes, complex, it was completely
designed as a single unit before any one piece was built) do not match
the stars as they appear in the sky today, but they match the stars as
they appeared 12500 y ago. (The change is due to the precession of Earth's
axis: the North Pole points at Polaris today, but 12500 y ago it pointed
at Vega, as it will again in another 12500 y or so. The complete
precessional cycle is 25920 y.) The extensive rain erosion on the Sphinx
suggests a similar date.
MS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've just heard that there will be an empty suitecase traveling my way from
Worthycote, Milnthorpe Lane, Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
This is my chance to get a British micro for my collection.
Are there any surplus classic machines in the area?
Unfortunately the suiteaces will be filled for the return trip
- --
Collector of vintage computers
http://www.ncf.ca/~ba600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAzfX8LPrIaE/xBZARAlCZAJ0UrDRE4YCUvrmjGm/5CRlWazsw+QCeJeN/
2IikOKRt4yE/7YFKwOXbals=
=n1n1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>From: "der Mouse" <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca>
>
>> I've only ever possessed one [microwave oven], it currently still
>> seems to cook as well (or badly) as it ever did so I've had no cause
>> to examine it in any detail.
>
>Same here.
>
>> If it breaks, it will get looked at (although I suspect, without ever
>> having checked, that a new megnetron will cost a significant fraction
>> of the price of a microwave oven). Still, there's always the chance
>> that the controller or its keypad will give up the ghost.
>
>That's what happened with my oven. It was bought at a garage sale some
>years back, and worked fine for some time (years). Then after a
>lightning storm, it started beeping intermittently at odd times when it
>shouldn't. After a few days, it occurred to me that if it could beep
>when it wasn't suppsoed to, it could turn on the microwaves when it
>isn't supposed to. I opened it up and found that the keypad and
>control board all culminated in two relays, one to control the fan and
>the other the microwave-generator. I checked, and a new board would
>cost almost as much as we paid for the oven. So I yanked the whole
>thing, wired the fan and magnetron together (I almost always used it on
>high anyway, and lower power settings worked by imposing a <100% duty
>cycle on the magnetron), and controlled it with an ordinary wall light
>switch, on the principle that it's too simple for much to go wrong.
---snip---
Hi
Interesting. I know how, just about every part of, a microwave
oven works and I wouldn't have done this. I'd have thrown
the thing away and bought another at a garage sale.
You also have to realize that I'm the kind of fellow that
once did a field repair on broken points spring of
a car with some cardboard, tape and several springs from
some ballpoint pens. It got me home.
Also, I doubt that a normal wall light switch is rated for
that large of an inductive load.
Dwight
> A transistor can avalanche and not recover without removing the
> power. A tube can recover with the power on, as long as the metal
> don't ionize.
Not true, a flashover in a valve is just as destructive as a similar
condition in a transistor and cannot be snubbed without removing the
supplies.
We have big crowbar switches here.
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
by the way... I am not bringing an 11/45 to vcf east :) I was referring to
how it looked when I got it recently from TN. I haven't started on that
restoration project yet, and I doubt pretty seriously it'd get any awards
the way it looks now *GRIN* Well, maybe... "system carrying the most dirt
and grime".
Now, if Sellam would ever have a VCF-Central, in St. Louis, I would bring
the dual bay HP2000/Access system. If it'd be in St. Louis then I wouldn't
mind so much having to tear a wall out of the basement to get it out.
It does look like there is a pretty reasonable chance I will make it to VCF
east. Can't wait to meet everyone! I will most likely be driving from St.
Louis to VCF and back with either a small flatbed trailer, or a van (or
both). Any riders along the way want to come with and share gas costs? It'd
be nice to make the drive in one stretch, doable with multple drivers.
If anyone going to VCF east wants any HP racks, 13037 controller systems, or
7906 disc drives, now is the time to speak up cause I'll bring it all with
me. Could bring some 21MX's too.
Regards,
Jay West