> Hi,
>
> I came across your 8008/8080 web page while searching for ...
I've noticed a fair number of these types of posts lately. Basically
it comes down to the address munging that's being done to prevent
spammers from harvesting is also preventing legitimate browsers from
identifying the authors of messages individually.
I'm not sure if anyone wants this fixed, but couldn't we perform some
form of reversible modification to the email address? Perhaps turning
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org into cctalk2003ATclassiccmpDOTorg would fool the
harvesters and allow people to reply to an individual.
Just a thought,
Erik Klein
www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum
The Vintage Computer Forum
OK, apologies first as this has been done to death at various times in the
past, and now I come to need the info I haven't got the willpower to piece it
together from archives of several thousand posts :-)
I'm trying to organise and back up all my data (primarily on my main PC system)
- but I'd also like to make images of the disks for some of my classic
platforms whilst I'm at it. I don't have any kind of fancy floppy controller,
just whatever comes in a standard PC (I do have PCs running Windows 2000,
Windows ME, Windows NT, Linux and DOS so I'm not too fussy about OS choice)
I have various 5.25" floppy drives lying around, although I *assume* the 1.2MB
drive will electrically read all of my 5.25" disks (whether the controller can
understand the raw data coming off the disks is another matter of course)
I've got disks for the following machines which I'd like to initially back up:
Acorn BBC / BBC Master / Cambridge Workstation (I believe these are all the
same low-level format even if filesystem structure is different)
DEC Rainbow (B model, if there's a difference between that and the A)
Apple (Apple ][, //e and /// - again I believe low-level structure is the
same for all 3?)
So, in an ideal world, what I'd like to be able to do is use some piece of
software on the PC and suck an entire image off each disk, archive it onto tape
/ CD / whatever, then at some point in the future be able to use the same
software on a PC to rebuild from those disk images such that they'll work in
the machine they were intended to.
I'm not even going to think about the Amiga and Mac 3.5" disks for now; I know
the PC controller won't handle those - and all the stuff on cassette tape can
wait too! :-)
(the couple of Macs I do have might be a better bet for this job, but
unfortunately none of them are networked and so I couldn't get the data off
them to a place where I can store it easily)
cheers
Jules
________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/
I have been looking for a C-10 for some time but lost out in a recent auction.
My bad luck, so I doesn't suppose anyone might know where I can find another C-
10. I know its a long shot but I thought I would ask. Any suggestions would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Kurt
"Erik Klein" <classiccmp(a)vintage-computer.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I came across your 8008/8080 web page while searching for ...
>
> I've noticed a fair number of these types of posts lately. Basically
> it comes down to the address munging that's being done to prevent
> spammers from harvesting is also preventing legitimate browsers from
> identifying the authors of messages individually.
No, they can identify the author by name. What it really comes down
to is that the address munging provides a mailto: link which makes it
easy for folks who find the archive pages to generate an e-mail
message to the list (which is OK), and that these folks don't realize
that they're about to post to a mailing list and that providing some
context would be a good thing. If they realized that, they could
perhaps write "w/r/t foo's message to this list on date mm/dd/yy on
the matter of bar" or even copy and paste some of the webby archive
page into the message.
What might be helpful would be for the webby archive pages to not have
that link right next to the poster's name, but instead to have a "post
a follow-up to this message" link somewhere on the page. I have no
idea how to do this using pipermail though.
-Frank McConnell
On Jun 23, 14:43, Erik Klein wrote:
> I've noticed a fair number of these types of posts lately. Basically
> it comes down to the address munging that's being done to prevent
> spammers from harvesting is also preventing legitimate browsers from
> identifying the authors of messages individually.
>
> I'm not sure if anyone wants this fixed, but couldn't we perform some
> form of reversible modification to the email address? Perhaps
turning
> cctalk(a)classiccmp.org into cctalk2003ATclassiccmpDOTorg would fool
the
> harvesters and allow people to reply to an individual.
I'd like to see it fixed. I've had occasional useful contacts from
people who've seen my address in the archive, and I'd rather see it
munged in some human-reversible way than simply replaced with the
mailing list address.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
I came across your 8008/8080 web page while searching for info on old
Tektronix logic analyzers.
I recently bought a model 1220 analyzer on eBay which is very similar to the
1230 you describe. It didn't come with pods or probes, but I thought I might
be able to improvise something. After some study of the front panel
connector with an ohmmeter and voltmeter, I believe I've identified the data
lines, power and ground, and some other inputs that must be used for clocks
and control signals, but the analyzer doesn't respond to any of the signals
I feed in. It seems to have some mechanism for recognizing that a compatible
Tek pod is attached. The input channels just show up as "unused" when I
attempt to acquire data. I suppose it could be some setup step I'm missing,
but I don't see anything on the various menus that looks like a pod enable.
I'd appreciate any insight you can give me into this problem. Also, are you
aware of other pods that go with these units besides the P6444's?
Thanks,
Dan
I am getting a gaggle of Burroughs B20/BTOS machines through eBay. I developed
software on them for Burroughs back in the late 80s. Didn't really care for
the machines at the time, but I thought the expansion capability by
adding "slices" was pretty neat.
Does anyone have any B20 "slices" or any BTOS/CTOS software or documentation
that they want to sell?
alan
BTW, long ago I promised to scan in some of my VAX documentation, but life
keeps getting in the way. I hope to get that stuff done in August now.
I put some pictures of the TU20 tape drive for the PDP-9 at:
http://ricm.museum.com/collections/pdp-9/pdp-9.html
I was a little surprised to see the HP label on the transport.
Michael Thompson
E-Mail: M_Thompson(a)IDS.net
Hi John
Although it is a serious issue if the tape is folded where
the signals are, where the holes are isn't. Just fold the tape
in two diagonal directions and cut it with sizzors. The hole
will be a square but the computer doesn't care. You'll need
to erase the tape and reformat.
Dwight
>From: John <john_a_s2003(a)hotmail.com>
>
>Hi,
>
>I have some DC100A type cartridges for my HP-85, but at the start of the
>tape the magnetic coating has come away where the drive belt has been left
>in contact with the same part of the tape for too long.
>
>I have figured out the pattern of holes in the end of the tape used by the
>optical sensor to detect EOT. I would like to punch a new set of holes away
>from the damaged area and see if the rest of the tape is usable.
>
>So any tips please on making suitable holes in the tape, my attempts so far
>with a pin have not been a great success.....
>
>Thanks,
>John
