I seem to remember someone was attempting to gain a non-profit museum
status from the IRS for their collection. Were they successful and what
was the total out come? Was it worth the effort? Would they recomend
the process for others? Was it worth the hassles of filing paperwork
regularly?
I know it's a lot of questions. My collection is out growing my
available space (don't we all have this problem?), so I was wondering
about options.
James
--
http://webpages.charter.net/jrice54/classiccomp2.html
Rackmount MicroVAX II given to me by a local PCB manufacturer.
When I went to pick this machine up, it worked at their location. Booted
into VMS and everything. Took it out of rack to transport home (they
would not give up the original DEC rack). I marked all cables before
disassembling, and put it back together in the same configuration.
Got it home and the system would not get past the "3" stage of
its self test.
Any ideas?
On Dec 13, 20:48, J.C. Wren wrote:
> Supposing you're one of those people that have always wanted a
PDP-11/74, but
> know next to nothing about them. Is there a good guide anywhere for
"here's
> the cards, here's the combinations they'll work in, and here's why
mixing
> this card with that card will work, but isn't a good idea."
>
> I'd like to wind up with an 11/74
Why do you think you want a PDP-11/74? That's one of the "never-11s",
a machine designed but never sold. It's the biggest -11 ever made.
Do you want a Q-Bus machine (typically fairly small in size) or a
Unibus machine (typically quite large)? Perhaps you're thinking of an
11/73?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Dec 14, 0:02, Tony Duell wrote:
> > I have the manual for the ACB4000 series, if you want to borrow it.
>
> How much useful information does it contain? Anything not obvious
about
> the board (i.e. anything I'd not fiogure out in 10 minutes given the
> board and normal teat gear?)
Other than the programming information for the various SCSI commands,
no.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Dec 11, 12:05, Jules Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 23:50, Tony Duell wrote:
> > Some controller have links to enable/disable precompensation. The
Adaptec
> > ACB4000 (I mention that one, since I have an ACW on the bench at
the
> > moment, so the details are stuck in my brain)
>
> Oh, that reminds me - I came across another ACW owner last night.
> Waiting to hear what (if any) docs / software he has for it.
I have the manual for the ACB4000 series, if you want to borrow it.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Whereas, Al Kossow wrote:
>The long term prospects of tape transports with any rubber parts is not
good, either.
>Almost all of the 1/4" cartridge tape drives I own are inoperable because
the drive
>pinch rollers have turned to goo.
Now therefore:
I?m left to wonder of these rubber parts could be recast. I have had success
casting rubber
using Devcon flexane. It?s a 2 part mix with extremely low shrinkage. The
medium ?80? liquid
has a companion softener flex-add which allow one to adjust the hardness of
the resulting rubber.
I have used Freeman machinable wax to make molds with good results. I would
think that with
reasonable machining practice a run-out of a thousandth or so could be had
re-rubberizing a roller
spindle. (A human hair being about 3 thousandths of an inch)
If greater precision were required a machining allowance could be added to
the rubber and it could be
frozen and ground after casting. (Not that I would look forward to liquid
nitrogen all over my south bend lathe,
and it?s not like we?re making disk heads here)
The bottom line is that if it was made, it can be made. After all, some
telescope hobbyists make their own mirrors!
Your thoughts?
Mike.
On Dec 12, 11:27, John Allain wrote:
> >> Jerome Fine replies:
> >>
> >> First, the M8190-AB is a PDP-11/73 CPU board and
> >> usually runs in an ALL Qbus system. Don't forget that
>
> > Patrick Finnegan answers:
> > So can someone fix this in the "FIELD GUIDE TO Q-BUS
> > AND UNIBUS MODULES"
> > doc? It's got an M8190 listed as an 11/84 CPU.
>
> In another source
> KDJ11-A_UsersManual.pdf. page.73/2-18,
> the M8192 is the J11, which is the 11/73 CPU.
Not necessariliy, or to put it another way, both are correct. The J11
is a chip , used in several PDP-11 variants.
The M8190 is a processor board used in 11/73, 11/83, and 11/84. The
difference is (1) the 11/73 originally had a 15MHz clock, and the 11/83
and 11/84 had an 18MHz clock, (2) the 11/73 and 11/8x had different
ROMs, and (3) in an 11/73 system the memory is arranged after the CPU
in conventional fashion, whereas in an 11/83 the memory is PMI memory
and is placed before the CPU. There are several revisions of the ROMs
for the 11/8x, and the second letter of the suffix (the first is always
'B') tells you what the original ROM version was. This is a
quad-height board with two bootstrap ROMs (actually EPROMs), line time
clock, and two SLUs. All M8190s are the same (modulo engineering
change orders etc) apart from crystal and ROMs.
The M8192 is always an 11/73; it's a dual-height board with no SLus or
ROMs, etc. It was usually sold as an OEM item or as an upgrade for
11/23 systems. There ar a few variants of this too, becasue there as a
bug in early versions of an ASIC which meant that some early ones would
not work with an FPU upgrade.
All these boards are Q-Bus boards. There is no Unibus version. The
11/84 used an M8190 in a backplane with a Unibus converter (the CPU and
memory were Q-Bus, the rest of the machine was Unibus). The 11/94
worked in a similar way. However, Eric may be right about the 11/84
bus being slightly different from normal Q-Bus, so that the official
11/84 memory may be different.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Dec 12, 12:57, emanuel stiebler wrote:
> John Allain wrote:
>
> > Wasn't there an 11/93~4 too...
> > Was this a J11 with more clock speed again?
>
> Nope. But all memory (fast !) was on board already, and 8 serial
lines.
Er, yes it was a J11, but different board.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Dec 12, 20:08, Jochen Kunz wrote:
> AFAIK that M8192 dual /73 CPU board was never used in DEC machines.
It
> was targeted to the OEM market or to replace the dual /23 board used
in
> embedded systems.
It was also sold in the 11/73S systems (look like an 11/23 but have a
KDJ11 processor).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
Someone's just given me a Commodore Minuteman 3MW (model MM3MW) calculator.
The device itself is working fine, but I still need to replace the battery
pack and charge connector (the batteries were rechargeable nicad, N size).
Anyway, just to satisfy my curiosity, I'd like to get some data on the ICs
used inside it - these are:
LC1552B / 7438 - looks like the main controller. Has some strange logo I've
never seen before - kind of a _/- (a squared off S?) with a circle
printed over the top.
ITT / 492-5 / 7445 - these appear to be LED drivers. I've never seen a part
number like this. BTW, the "7445" is printed vertically, the rest of the
p/n is printed horizontally (as normal).
NSA298 / NS 436 - the "NS" looks a LOT like one of National Semiconductor's
old logos. Did NatSemi ever make LED display panels?
Now, to finish satisfying my curiosity, does anyone know anything about the
Commodore MM3MW? A schematic diagram or service manual would be nice :)
Thanks.
--
Phil. | Acorn Risc PC600 Mk3, SA202, 64MB, 6GB,
philpem(a)dsl.pipex.com | ViewFinder, 10BaseT Ethernet, 2-slice,
http://www.philpem.dsl.pipex.com/ | 48xCD, ARCINv6c IDE, SCSI