Look for companies that sell conservation (as in museum storage) supplies.
Some that I know of are Gaylord Brothers, Light Impressions, and Hollinger
Corp. They sell acid free (buffered) and inert materials for storing
documents, photos, textiles, etc.
You might also go to a building supply company and get a roll or Tyvek
building wrap and make your own sleeves. More or less the same stuff used
for 51/4 inch floppy disk sleeves. Only problem might be you would need to
use an archival glue or tape to hold the sleeves together.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tothwolf [mailto:tothwolf@concentric.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 1:57 AM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: OT: dumpster dive and water/mold cleanup
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> I've made sleeve from the vinyl you can buy in rolls from Walmart for
> putting over leaky windows - it's pliable and thinck and similar to the
> vinyl that our "forefathers" (and foremothers) used to cover their
> furniture with, but thinner. Fold it and then heat seal the top and
> bottom edges. I've seen forsted vinyl sleeves lik that in years past
> that came with an odd sized box that they could be stored in, sort of an
> archival manner of storage.
I'd be worried about the PH of such material. Highly acidic (or even
highly alkaline) materials are the enemy of items you wish to preserve.
-Toth
OK. A little looking around has revealed that I have a Model 707 (not
the 707/1200, darn it!) and a model 745. I also found out this evening
that $friend forgot to give me the shopping bag full of thermal
paper....
I've found a lot of links to pages that mention there, but no real
documentation. Oh, and one company that will sell a manual for the 745
for $30 plus S&H.
Does anyone know where I might find real information? Considering the
source, I have every hope that they are fully functional.
Doc
I figure anything CP/M is on-topic, but the hardware I'm
talking
about would be brand new. :)
Are there working examples of CP/M running with just
a serial terminal connection and a drive+interface for
the sum total I/O? I'm assuming this has been done many
times and in theory would be nothing too offbeat?
If this exists, it might be useful to study the BIOS
to see what's being done there, or perhaps just buy the
board and CP/M if by chance something's out there already.
Are you giving up anything important with a terminal-based
CP/M system vs. one with integral monitor and keyboard --
in other words, cursor positioning and such in applications
being less flexible? I'm assuming the answer is "no", no
difference because of the way CP/M BDOS calls all go through
BIOS? Or is this a "in theory X in practice Y" thing?
The reason I'm asking is I've FINALLY -- after about two
months of struggle with hardware and coding -- succeeded in
getting my IDE interface working. Although it's currently
mated to a 6502 board and a 60GB HDD, since it's based on
an 82C55, could just as easily be coded to work with a
Z80/Z180 system.
Okay, I know that porting a BIOS to a new board would be
massively non-trivial. I've got a good book "Programmer's
Guide to Using and Modifying CP/M" (IIRC) which makes it
clear
it would be a fairly good prospect to take months to finish,
even with good debugging practices. (Although I'm no
stranger
to coding moderate-sized assembly programs.)
On the other hand, I'd motivated by having an SBC that could
run
any of a number of C, Pascal, Modula 2 or Fortran compilers,
along with BASIC, decent editing tools (well, I cut my teeth
on PC-DOS Wordstar!), would make such an SBC really quite
nifty as a hacking toy.
Comments?
I'm thinking of using a GAL decoder to map 32Kx8 of "shadow"
EEPROM to MEMRDs and the "shadow" RAM to the same address
for
MEMWRs upon RESET, then copy the "shadow" ROM to RAM on
coldboot,
and then write to an I/O port to cause the GAL to map only
the 128Kx8 SRAM into the machine memory map and jump to 0 to
bootstrap
up.
Not sure if BIOS could use the upper 64K
bank for storage in a useful way like disk I/O buffering,
but since 128Kx8 SRAMs are cheap and small, and I've got
a tubefull, that's what I'd want to use. :)
P.S.: I got the 360K floppy to work under Win98, but not XP.
I suspect it's just an undocumented "feature" of XP. :)
You might want to check out the following project if you want to build your
own small PDP-8. David Conroy has implemented a PDP-8i in an FPGA.
http://surfin.spies.com/~dgc/pdp8x/
I might have some info on the 6100, I'll have to try and remember. I've got
databooks from them and I believe Harris that list it.
Zane
>
> I think it used unobtainium type RAM and ROM, being
> all early Intersil CMOS, so it might be very difficult
> to make an "authentic" one today even if you had a
> 6100. The 6100 was, given my limited knowledge, harder
> to make truly PDP8/e compatible than the later 6120.
> I've looked around for a ROM listing or front panel
> code for the 6100/Intercept with no luck.
>
>
>
>
> --- "Peter C. Wallace" <pcw(a)mesanet.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > --- Mike <dogas(a)bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I just had to nominate the Intersil Intercept
> > Jr. to the early laptop
> > > > catagory, Runs on batteries, fits in a lap.
> > > >
> > > > ;) - Mike: dogas(a)bellsouth.net
> > >
> > > Are there plans out there anywhere? I doubt I'll
> > ever run across
> > > a real one. They looked kinda cool back when I
> > was a kid, but at
> > > the time, I didn't understand what it meant to be
> > PDP-8-instruction-
> > > set compatible (i.e., the implications of it, not
> > the literal sense
> > > of "compatible").
> > >
> > > It had, IIRC, some toggle switches, LEDs, and 4KW
> > of SRAM, right?
> > >
> > > -ethan
> >
> > The intercept had those, the Intercept Jr only had a
> > keypad and numeric LED
> > display. It only 256 or 1K (12 bit) words of RAM
> > ISTR
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> > > http://finance.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
> > Peter Wallace
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> http://finance.yahoo.com
>
Loboyko Steve wrote:
> I think it used unobtainium type RAM and ROM, being
> all early Intersil CMOS, so it might be very difficult
> to make an "authentic" one today even if you had a
> 6100.
On mine, the motherboard uses a IM6312 for the
"microinterpreter" (dated mid 1977). And I assume that
the three IM6561s are ram chips (dated early 1978).
The rest consists of:
1 - IM6100
2 - CD4511
1 - CD4042
1 - F4075
2 - 74C74
1 - F40175
1 - CD4025
2 - F40098
1 - 74C42
1 - CD4069
1 - CD4011
1 - F4001
1 - 1K Beckman DIP Resistor pak
1 - 10K Beckman DIP Resistor pak
8 - FND 367 7 segment red LED displays
1 - 2.4576 MHz crystal
1 - 12 key keypad
4 - 2N2222 transistors
3 - 44 pin circuit edge connectors
1 - battery holder to hold 4 D cell batteries in series
and a few resistors, diodes, capactors and a switch
Now the "6951c-M1KX12" plug-in battery-backuped ram board
has 12 IM6518s.
> I've looked around for a ROM listing or front panel
> code for the 6100/Intercept with no luck.
Somewhere here I have the users manual and I am almost
certain that there is a listing of the microinterpreter
in the manual.
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://dcoward.best.vwh.net/analog
Analogrechner, calculateur analogique,
calcolatore analogico, analoogrekenaar,
komputer analogowy, analog bilgisayar,
kampiutere ghiyasi, analoge computer.
=========================================
>Home recorded?? I didn't know that was possible!
The only time I ever actually saw a record recorder was on an episode of
the Honeymooners. Ralph recorded a message for Alice on his record
player. He made a comment about needing a blank record, and then spoke
into what looked like a mini horn speaker.
I assumed that since the Honeymooners was a "reality" show, that the
device actually existed (and since I have heard reference to such a thing
elsewhere).
Anyone know what material the blank records used? I would think ceramic
would be too hard, and even vinyl records seem like the material would be
too stiff to get a good recording.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>I've never heard of ceramic records. Is this different than the old
>bakelite reocrds?
Don't know. I'm not a record expert, so maybe they aren't ceramic. I was
told that was the material, and I know they are a hard, brittle, fragile
glass or clay like substance (from the one that I broke).
These are 1910-1920 era records (based on the fact that they carry the
Victrola name, and IIRC, my Victrola has a 1913 date on the back)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
It has been some time since the OT rants took up the majority of
e-mails, and now we get the spammers in the list . . . .
I've noticed that I get upwards of 100 e-mails a day from you guys.
Much of it gets disposed of if I have no interest, but on occasion I
pick up some nice tidbits of information for future reference.
What I've seen is multiple listings from the same person, who writes and
sends, writes and sends, a sentence or two at a time. Sometimes I think
one would be better off if one just sat back and composed a single post
with all the details in one fell swoop.
I'm sorry if this may have offended someone; it was not intended to.
Just some biased observations and a suggestion to help cut down on some
of the unneeded traffic.
You all have a wonderful treasure of knowlege out there, just make the
nuggets a bit bigger . . . please????
Gary Hildebrand
St. Joseph, MO
>Are you thinking of 45s? I've never heard of storing fragile 78s in wire
>racks...
I have some ceramic 78's stored in wire racks. They go to my Victrola. I
confiscated them that way from my father (when I repaired the Victrola
many years ago), but I remember growing up they were always stored that
way in the basement.
I can't say however if my father put them that way, or if he got them
that way from my grandmother when he confiscated the Victrola from her
(with intention of repairing it, but he didn't, instead it sat in the
foyer for 15 years before I decided to see if I could get it going).
I haven't dared change their storage method simply because I am afraid of
breaking them, and I figure if they have made it about 30 years this way,
they should be able to make it another 30.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>