> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Hellige [mailto:jhellige@earthlink.net]
> Did I miss that? I don't recall him publicly bidding the
> list farewell? There certainly is a considerable amount of
> experience that left with the people already mentioned that have
> unsubscribed.
He did unsub -- many days ago. It was not exactly due to arguments,
but due to his objection to some peoples' positions in them, I
believe. I won't speak for him, though.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Sorry guys and girls,
I'm outta here.....
While on this list, I have met a lot of really cool people, and I have
obtained a lot of neat stuff, and I've gotten a lot of help... I also have
gotten sick of all the advocacy crap, the off-topic stuff, the tirades, and
sifting through 400 KB digests (Yes, that's 400KB PER DAY) just to get a few
nuggets...
I'm actually at the point where I'm afraid to ask certain questions for fear
of starting a flame fest...
While I severely doubt I'll be missed, I will miss Tony, Allison, Jeff H.,
Joe R., and all the others who have helped me with information, or
hardware...
Please reply by private email, because my next message will be to
unsubscribe....
Bye all,
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
Doc Wrote quoting Richard E.:
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>
> > BTW, it's spelled ADAPTEC on the box in front onf me ...
>
> Actually, the disk I'm looking at, as well as the 2940 I have in my
> hand, both say "adaptec" :)
>
> > Are any of those mfg's still in business?
>
> BusLogic >> Mylex
> NCR >> Symbios >> LSI >> IBM
I am fairly certain that Adaptec is still in business, while
NCR is often the source for the chipsets, I think Adaptec
is probably the largest seller of SCSI interface boards in
the PC market.
-dq
Richard, I'd like to ask for your help:
Although many of your posts are way outside this list's
frame of reference and they do tend to be somewhat, umm,
long-winded, especially when you quote in full, I must
admit that overall they are better written and show more
maturity and even open-mindedness than some of your
respondents; I'm also amazed by how Pavlovian that
reponse often is and that some people can not resist
replying and arguing with you, even in spite of themselves.
So I'm appealing to your maturity and to this power you
have to start controversial threads, and asking you to please
take those discussions off-list once they get rolling.
With judicious use of CCs you and those people who enjoy
these discussions can have the same lively exchanges among
yourselves, while those of us who don't share that enjoyment
are spared dozens if not hundreds of man-hours of scrolling
and/or deleting.
Jay's efforts past and future notwithstanding, I really think
that at this point you are the only person who can actually
do something about this, and hope that you do.
Thanks in advance (I AM quite sincere; there's no sarcasm
intended in this at all.)
And this latest thread has demonstrated at least one thing, the
surprising lack of knowledge about installing/using/maintaining
Windows among some of the people dissing it, which would at least
partially explain why they dislike it so (just like the people
who don't like linux or whatever for the same reason). OEM and
scripted installs, accessibility options, use of the Windows and
Application keys, remote computing, these all seem to be less
than completely understood by some people.
Maybe we could all ask, listen & learn a bit more instead of offering
statements and opinions which are often incomplete or even wrong.
BTW, ten years ago, Win3.1 had just been released last month, and
it would be quite a stretch to call linux 0.95 an operating system.
mike
Adaptec is still in business, but they did spin off some their software
(Easy CD Creator, etc.) as Roxio.
-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas H. Quebbeman [mailto:dquebbeman@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:47 AM
To: ClassicCmp List
Subject: Re: TTi tape drives
<snip>
I am fairly certain that Adaptec is still in business, while
NCR is often the source for the chipsets, I think Adaptec
is probably the largest seller of SCSI interface boards in
the PC market.
-dq
Apologies that this is a bit OT, but does relate into some areas that are of
interest to people on this list.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Goldstein [mailto:hal_goldstein@THADDEUS.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 5:01 PM
To: HPLX-L(a)UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU
Subject: Jornada 560 dies, takes Corvallis tradition with it
You heard it first here. We just got word, thanks to the merger, HP will no
longer produce its 560 series! (It will most likely continue the 720
Handheld and successors). They will product "HP iPAQs" out of Houston.
Frankly, I find it a total bummer as a long time HP watcher and supporter.
This marks the official end to the tradition started by the Corvallis
division, which invented the calculator. Yes, the division moved to
Singapore and it was never the same. Still there were brilliant, innovative
products that came from Singapore. With the new keyboard-cover HP Jornada
560, I finally, had no regrets leaving the HP 200LX.
In my mind the 560 with longest battery life, fewest bugs, and removable
battery was the best Pocket PC 2002. Now dead!
The HP 200LX -- no successor, and from this list's point of view the best
PDA ever. Dead.
The OmniBook 800 -- efficient design, built in mouse, truly portable. Dead.
The OmniBook 300 -- could actually run it on 4 AA batteries! OS in ROM.
Built-in mouse. Dead
The HP 110 and Portable Plus -- 1985 -- DOS portable with 9 hour battery
life. Everything in ROM. Wonderful machines. Dead.
Now we have HP Houston (who outsources the manufacture and much of the
design of the unit).
Good bye any sense of HP as we knew it.
YUK!
We will have info as we receive it at www.pocketpcmag.com
Hal at Thaddeus
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
OK, spring cleaning time again. Free for pickup in the Washington DC
suburbs: strictly first-come, first-serve, and I strongly want to get rid
of the stuff this weekend. Some items are large and
will require a truck (or a truly full-size station wagon.) If interested,
drop an E-mail to me at "shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com" or call on my cellphone
at 202-320-9410.
OK, the list - largely an inventory of stuff that hasn't been used in
at least two years:
40 RL01 and RL02 packs, with various diagnostics and other tools on them.
A Wright-line cabinet with the metal racks for holding the above packs.
6 RL01 and RL02 drives. Rack-mounting rails for the same.
RX02 drive unit.
Gobs of RL01 and RL02 cables. Also, all my miscellaneous RL termiantors,
buttons, unit select plugs, and lamps.
2 Storagetek 1600/6250 BPI 9-track drives, Pertec formatted interface, rack-
mounting hinges.
Many BA11- and BA23-style Q-bus enclosures. Bunch of 11/23-era CPU's
and memory for whoever takes the enclosures.
One pedestal-style BA23 with most (all?) of a Microvax III in it.
One BA123 with most (all?) of a Microvax II in it.
PDP-11/04 in 5.25" high box, H777 power supply.
Several H960 (6-foot) racks will be available, assuming that you
(or someone else) will help me carry them up the stairs.
A bunch of Trimm drive enclosures for 5.25" drives. Styled like BA23's.
Many 5.25" FH SCSI and ESDI drives. Many 5.25" floppy drives.
Many Shugart 8" floppy drives.
Tim.
>(1) Several guys believe that using Windows obscures much of the power of
>the
>computer from the user. Is that important if the user's needs are met?
>
>(2) Several guys believe that using Unix/Linux is "Better." Why? If the
>user's needs are met, what does it matter how it happens?
>
>(3) Several (at least one, probably more) Mac advocates have stated that the
>Mac offers more efficiency. How does that figure? How does it help so long
>as the needs of the user are met?
>
>(4) What does it matter which OS or hardware arrangement is "better" if the
>user's functional and budgetary requirements/limitations are met?
I think it has become clear... the reason why Richard can't grasp why
something might be better than Windows is simply because he doesn't grasp
that maybe, there are better ways of doing things. He seems content with
successfully doing a task, and cares not about making that task easier,
faster, or more "pleasant".
For instance, I can flip a burger on a hot grill with my fingers. What
does it matter if I use a spatula, I got the job done didn't I? My needs
were met weren't they? And I even saved money up front since I didn't
have to buy anything to flip the burgers. However TCO of this method will
rapidly become apparent when I start burning myself. My "user experience"
will decrease since I will have sore fingers. I will also start racking
up bills on aloe cream to soothe the burns.
But my needs were met, and I did it with a cheaper setup than my neighbor
who bought the grill tools set, so why should I admit that there may be a
better way... it doesn't matter, I can flip burgers just fine already.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Bill Sudbrink wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > A lot of folks
> > > > > > > > who had a lot to contribute here have left because of this problem.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Got any examples to back that statement up?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chuck McManis, Andrew Davies, Tim Shoppa... I'm sure there are more who
> > > > > > chose to simply make silent departures.
> > > > >
>
> Eric Smith too -- miss him.
Eric stays very busy, and I think that's a common theme amongst
the members of the exodus. They don't have the *time* to wade
through the noise to get to the signal.
However, I think some seemingly absent members might be
lurking. Steve Robertson is one example who comes to mind.
Eric remains everpresent on USENET, and co-collaborator
Al Kossow continues to scan the list for comment-worthy
material, so if you ring Erics's bell loudly enough, I
think you'll get his attention.
Others noted missing: Chris Kennedy (I fear my carburetor
thread chased him off); Mark Crispin; Daniel Seagraves;
Lance Costanzo; Rob Kapteyn; David Betz; Dave Mabry;
Lawrence LeMay; Brian Wheeler; Brian Knittel; Dave Babcock;
Clint Wolff; Curt Vendel; Jim Arnott; Shawn Rutledge;
Edwin P. Groot; Brian Chase; Mike McFadden.
If I keep digging through personal correspondance, I'm
sure I'll find more.
We didn't hear much from Allison until recently; did I just
recently see a post from Megan? R. D. Davis was gone or silent
for a long time (and please don't anyone use this as an opportuniyy
for a gouge)
My Co-Cyber Conspirator Greg Travis subscribed and unsubscribed
in the very same day.
Now, I'd like to believe in many cases, that people just get
busy, and as you all know, if you subscribe to this list in
non-digest mode, you MUST service your inbox or routed folder
DAILY or you will just fill up. So I suspect some of these
people unsub, then sub back up briefly to test the waters.
They don't see what they like, they unsub again. Others may
have switched to digest mode but don't post because there's
not enough signal to be of interest.
Oops, I forget I run at 1280 x 1024, and a windowfull of text
might be pages for others, so I'll cut this short...
-dq