test-drb May 2002

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

246 participants
947 discussions

Start a nNew thread

The answer is: Mekel 460XL Microfiche scanner

by vaxman＠earthlink.net

The question is: What do I now own? <grin>

22 years, 2 months

IRIX on Personal Iris

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On May 8, 17:34, Robert Schaefer wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Corda Albert J DLVA" <CordaAJ(a)nswc.navy.mil> > > on one side of the simm. Did someone already mention that > > you can only have 1 bank of 4Mb simms in a system, due to > > a prom bug? There is no restriction on the number of other size > > simms. > > Isn't that just the Indy, or something? I remember reading it, but it > didn't (that I recall) mention the 4D/35. That does jive with the only > machine that has 4MB simms in it though-- only one bank (four SIMMS). No, Indys can use any mix of 4MB, 8MB, 16MB, 32MB SIMMS, and they (and Indigo2 and R4000 Indigo) take standard 72-pin fastpage-mode parity SIMMs. There's a bug in the ASIC (according to SGI) on the 64-pin proprietary SIMMs which means you can use any number of 2MB or 8MB SIMMs but only one set of 4MB SIMMs on a 4D/35 or R3000 Indigo. -- Pete Peter Turnbull Network Manager University of York

22 years, 2 months

OT: Windows V3.2?!?

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

> From: Cameron Kaiser > > > I was just using Calmira, makes windows 3.1 look like windows 95. > > Calmira is indeed very neat. I use it on my lone Windows machine (the only > other Windows machine in the apartment is the Macintosh! under VPC, > natch). > It makes the W3.1 interface more contemporary, at least. :-) > > -- > This is something I'll have to try! I have a Cardinal PC-10 all-in-1 '386 computer (looks like a Mac SE/30) that I was wondering what I could do with it... -- --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818 Mac OS X 10.1 - Darwin Kernel Version 5 Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash

22 years, 2 months

FW: Free to a good home: MicroVAX 3400 (in .AU)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

Hey guys. I found this on comp.os.vms. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); ' -----Original Message----- From: P.Young(a)unsw.EDU.AU [mailto:P.Young@unsw.EDU.AU] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:02 AM To: Info-VAX(a)Mvb.Saic.Com Subject: Free to a good home: MicroVAX 3400 (in .AU) Due to the donation of a couple of Academics and an Alpha 8400 >from another University - the HSZ50, TSZ07 and disks having already arrived in my office - I'm running of space to do any work! I was keeping the MV 3400 to read 9 track tapes, however with a TSZ07 I no longer need it. It has 24Mb memory and a TU81 Plus tape drive. Either the TU81 or KLESI is broken - I suspect the KLESI. A 400Mb and 150Mb DSSI disk is included. I want this out of my office, so please do not ask "can I have part xyzzy" - it is a job lot. Equipment located at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

22 years, 2 months

Windows V3.2?!?

by SUPRDAVE＠aol.com

In a message dated 5/9/2002 3:18:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time, nemesis-lists(a)icequake.net writes: > > I remember a patch or add-on that was referred to as Win 3.2 - added > > supposedly 32 bit features to the old WIn3.x and I think was just really > a > > tinkering project in the development of 95. > > You're thinking of Win32S, which was the first attempt at a 32-bit > extension > to the Windows API. Not Windows 3.2. :) I think OS/2 can run Win32S > programs > natively through Win-OS2. > Only a certain version of Win32 though. I do not remember however. I tried once to get hotmetal pro working under OS/2, but I think the Win32 version was higher than what OS/2 could use.

22 years, 2 months

attn: list admins

by Adrian.Graham＠corporatemicrosystems.com

I've been trying all sorts of ways I can think of majordomo-wise to get off this list, and each time it tells me my email address isn't valid; if that's the case why am I still getting list mail both here and digest mail at home? It ceased to be interesting here months ago with all the bitching and in-fighting, so it would be nice to stop receiving the mails. Thanks. witchy

22 years, 2 months

Good luck on New finds the last two days.

by jrkeys＠concentric.net

1. Model 100 in black plastic briefcase style carrying case from Radio Shack. In it was a Model 100 with a black leather case, a Radio Shack cassette player in it's own black leather case model 26-1209, half dozen different cables, 2 cassette tapes in cases, a two piece acoustic coupler (25-3805) for the model 100. Pretty cool little setup. 2. Apple LC580 all-in-one unit 3. Tandy 4000 cpu only 4. Apple III monitor 5. Radius Color Pivot monitor 6. Mac 6500/250 tower with built-in Zip drive 7. Tektronix type 561A Oscilloscope comes with a type 3A6 Dual-Trace amplifier and type 3B3 time Base. Guy let me have it for $2 8. Unisys flat tape drive 9. Atari LYNX unit with ac adapter 10. Manual for the Black Mac TV And more items than I can list due to their age (less than 10).

22 years, 2 months

[not OT]Anyone with an SMD rework station

by rschaefe＠gcfn.org

willing to do work on classic (read not easily replacable) machines? Specifically I'm interested in adding SOJ RAM to some proprietary SGI SIMMS, and possibly SOJ RAM to a SPARCBook2 CPU board. The chip spacing is such that a soldering iron is not a viable alternative. Thanks! Bob

22 years, 2 months

Windows V3.2?!?

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Blakeman [mailto:rhb57@vol.com] > I remember a patch or add-on that was referred to as Win 3.2 - added > supposedly 32 bit features to the old WIn3.x and I think was > just really a > tinkering project in the development of 95. One of the things that I > remember in it was the first signs of SolFree but since I > rarely play games > it never really grabbed me that much. Sure. You're thinking of "win32s," which was an add-on to kind of poorly retrofit windows 3.1 with some "nt features." It is very similar to the later windows 95, in fact, and some versions of the microshaft development products would allow you to produce apps that used a somewhat limited subset of the win32 api, which would work on any of the three systems. I seem to remember that win32s may have been rather limited in what it could draw to the screen -- being still only able to really use windows 3.1 widgets, and that there were a few file handling conveniences that weren't added in. It has been a while, though. FWIW, many windows programs (understandably -- things like mpeg players, Mosaic, etc, etc...) used to require this. It was distributed, and may still be distributed, for free. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

22 years, 2 months

Classic Computers vs. Micro$oft 'droids (was: What other list s...)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com] > Over the last 25+ years, I have known quite a few people who > have worked > at MICROS~1, who were nevertheless good people. (fewer and fewer now) Oops! I wanted to reply to this point too. Since it's only arguably topical, I'll keep it short. I agree. It's certainly possible, given the size of their organization, that some of them are fine, intelligent people. They obviously don't run the place, but they may be there, nonetheless. I have no personal problem with any one of their employees, no matter what the company as a whole does. I'd hope that everyone else thinks that way too, but obviously that's not the case. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

22 years, 2 months

← Newer
1
...
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
...
95
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb May 2002