On Jan 12, 20:14, jpero(a)sympatico.ca wrote:
> Sounds like PSU is reacting to overloading or medium shorts
> downstream of that PSU outputs. Also can happen with dried
> up capacitors (too high ESR).
I don't think it's any of those. The regulators all make a similar noise
when I put them on a dummy load drawing 5A, on the bench. And I'm sure
it's not bad caps, as two of them are ones I repaired recently.
Maybe I'm just sensitive to that frequency range :-(
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I have two H744 regulators in my PDP-11/40, along with an H7441, H745, and
H754. I also have two spare H744s and one each H745 and H754. All the
H744s emit a fairly loud whistle, and it's driving me nuts. I've seen a
note somewhere that a loud whistle is caused by the coil de-laminating, but
I don't think that's the case. I tried swapping the two original H744s for
spares, no difference. I also tried swapping the coil from the spare H745,
which runs almost silently, and that made no difference either. I don't
think I can just remove (short out) the coil either, as this is a switching
regulator and the coil is needed to make it work properly.
Any suggestions?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
STC = Stantec = Standard Telephone and Cable. They sold a truly strange
computer called the ZEBRA. It was designed to be cheap (it used a drum
for storage and did arithmetic serially).
The instruction format is unusual -- 15 function bits (I think each affects
a gate) and a 12-bit address of a drum location and a 5-bit address of a
"fast store" location (basically a small number of registers). The amount
of logic in the machine is small, so the instruction decoding is simple
in a sense. But the logic is connected in very subtle ways -- two things
can happen independently, or an instruction can set a whole sequence
of events in motion.
There is an emulator for this machine; I have some of the literature
about it too. But I don't have the manual or the schematics, and the
literature I have just doesn't make the design "click" into place
in my head. The emulator code is not very intuitive either. So that's
why I'm hoping someone else has heard of this machine.
-- Derek
P.S. Tony, I think you would enjoy this design (if you don't already
know about it).
> jkunz(a)unixag-kl.fh-kl.de wrote:
>t 9e lists this codes as:
>42 20051269 Check_for_intrs ***
>C6 2004D2F0 SSC_powerup *********
>53 2004E8C0 TOY clock repeat_test_250ms_ea Tolerance ***
>
>TOY clock is OK, as I expect the NiCd akku to be ded. But
>"Check_for_intrs" and "SSC_powerup" are not that explanative to me.
SSC is the System Support Chip and it sounds as
though the diags are finding something wrong
with it. I have no docs that detail much about the
SSC and nothing that details exactly what the
diags are doing. It does sound as though the
chip has some sort of serious failure. I
*thought* that the SSC provided the console support
too - if that's right then it's clearly not completely
dead.
Did these errors only start when you
swapped cards around? Do thigns work
when you put things back as they were?
Antonio
On Jan 13, 2:54, Sipke de Wal wrote:
> Sometimes it helps to fasten coils a bit with siliconekit
> or araldite, or if a bit of heat is not a problem thermal-glue
> Silicone kit has the added benefit of dampening high freq.
> vibrations cause it has a somewhat rubbery constitution....
The coils in H7xx regulators are already encapsulated. Sorry, I should
have mentioned that.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi.
Every time I switch my MicroVAX 3900 on it says:
-----
?42 2 0C FF 00 0000
P1=2004CBA6 P2=FFFFFF0C P3=00000001 P4=00000000 P5=00000000
P6=00000000 P7=00000000 P8=00000000 P9=00000000 P10=00000000
r0=0000000C r1=00000000 r2=00000042 r3=2014078C r4=20051269
r5=20051096 r6=200550A7 r7=00000000 r8=00000000 ERF=80000000
?C6 2 01 FF 00 0001
P1=00000000 P2=00000000 P3=00000000 P4=00000000 P5=00000000
P6=00000000 P7=00000000 P8=00000000 P9=00000000 P10=00000000
r0=00000000 r1=00000022 r2=00000080 r3=201407A4 r4=2004D2F0
r5=2004D310 r6=2004D316 r7=00000000 r8=00000000 ERF=80000000
KA655-A V5.3, VMB 2.7
Performing normal system tests.
40..39..38..37..36..35..34..33..32..31..
?53 2 05 FF 00 0002
P1=00000002 P2=00000028 P3=00000000 P4=00D45577 P5=00000000
P6=FFFFFFFF P7=00000000 P8=00000000 P9=20051BD2 P10=20051CE0
r0=00000001 r1=00000001 r2=00000053 r3=00000000 r4=00000002
r5=2004E8F9 r6=200551A9 r7=00000000 r8=00000000 ERF=82000180
30..29..28..27..26..25..
24..23..22..21..20..19..18..17..16..15..14..13..12..11..10..09..
08..07..06..05..04..03..
Normal operation not possible.
>>>
-----
What does it want to tell me?
I get the same if I restart it via the reset button after power up. If
it was running for a wile I don't get an error on reset. If I switch
the power off for a few secounds I get the error again. NiCd akku?
--
tschuess,
Jochen
Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:21:25 -0500 (EST) Pat Finnegan
<pat(a)purdueriots.com> writes:
> By looking at mine, I can tell it uses a VGA monitor, and has 1M of
> RAM (upgradable to 5M with SIMMs I have laying around here). Oh yeah,
> it looks to be a 20MHz 80286 also.
Yeah, that's the later version. I seem to recall that they didn't make
too
many of those. . . .
> > I still have a copy of 3+Share (and 3+Start) around here
> > someplace . . .
>
> That would be nice if you could find it. However, I won't hold my
> breath for it. After attempting to hook an old floppy drive up to it's
> 34pin connector, I realized it was definately designed for something
else
> (one orientation froze the box, the other shorted out the power supply
> :-( )
Yow! DOes the thing still light up? I never did fighre out what that
connector was for.
> I'll take that into consideration. Thanks for the help!
Sure. Mebbe I'll have to dredge up my copy of 3+Share . . .
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
>But if you pick the cheapest, you may find they underestimated
>what it took to run a profitable company that will survive, and
>6 months later are out of business.
>
>I've seen it. People that bought from cheap local vendors that
>offered 5 year, even lifetime, warranties, gone, gone, gone.
>
>They come and go like sand on the beach.
>
>If they want a cheap PC, they have probably doomed themselves
>to failure from the outset.
I agree, but still, my attitude has become (due to years of dealing with
windows and the declining quality of PC hardware), that you can spend
$3000 on a PC, or you can spend $300 on a PC, and they are both going to
work (quality/stability wise) about the same. Either way, you will wind
up with problems keeping windows running. Granted 99% of this is due to
windows sucking so bad (if you aren't planning on running windows, then
this is a totally different situation, but I am only dealing with advise
I give to prospective Wintel buyers).
As for if a company will be here in 5 years to support the PC, there are
no bets that ANY computer company that is here today will still be here 5
years from now. (perfect example of this. A few years ago, my fire
department decided to switch from a Mac to a PC since we need to upgrade
the computer anyway. The PC people argued that Apple wouldn't be here in
5 years, so don't get a Mac. Us Mac people pointed out that it doesn't
matter, because in 5 years the computer will be ready to upgrade anyway.
Well, the vote went to get a PC... and to buy a Packard Bell. Well...
Apple is still selling Macs... and Packard Bell... well... they are the
ones that are gone... so the computer was replaced AGAIN, this time with
a Gateway... who now looks to be dying)
But I would still support people going to a fly by night, and risk them
going under. I don't advise getting long term support contracts anymore,
simply because I am so unimpressed with the support you can get. Phone
support tends to be luck of the draw. 90% of the time you get a brainless
bonehead. On site tends to be just as bad (I might be in one of those
"bad contract support" areas for the local "on site" support options...
don't know). So why pay 5 times the price to get a "brand name", when it
is going to give you the same headaches as the cheaper CompUSA sold, or
mom & pop sold PC. At least if you buy from a local vendor (CompUSA, or a
mom&pop), you can carry the computer in to them and bitch to a person...
you aren't stuck with phone support. And buy going with a cheap
mom&pop... you are more likely to get them to fix it. CompUSA will tell
you to contact the computer maker. Although, I do hear good things about
the local Gateway Country store in doing on the fly repairs on a carry in.
But honestly, I just don't recommend Wintel machines AT ALL anymore. I
really tell people to look around and find another option. If you want if
for games get a console system, if you want it for internet access, get a
used PC (I recommend used Win systems over used Macs for an internet only
machine, simply because, like it or not, many web sites cater to windows
and IE... that and many of the people that ask me about an internet only
machine want AOL, and the windows AOL client is much better than the Mac
one), and if you want it for general computing, get a Macintosh. Windows
blows, and is no longer worth the money and heartache for new machines
unless you NEED it for some reason. But that is just my opinion.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I've got two QIC tapes here:
- AT&T 3B2 Operating System
Utilities
Release 3.2.1 V3
120Mb Tape
- Operating System
Utilities
Rel 3.2.1 V3
Issue 2 (1Q93)
Free for the cost of postage. Surely someone has a 3b2 and needs
an OS..
Bill
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
Austin, TX