On Aug 3, 18:13, George Lewis wrote:
> I have not tried solaris 8 on a non-ultra machine, but may have to
> just to try it out. I do know that 2.6 works on my ss2s.
>
> A friend of mine does have solaris 8 running on a 10, but that's
> probably not terribly relevant.
Sun dropped support for the Sun4c architecture after Solaris 7.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I ran across a Jan. '84 issue of DEC Professional in the last box
of docs-and-such I got in; anybody got other back issues of this
magazine they'd be willing to part with?
Bill
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
Austin, TX
> Ok, so my DECServer has to boot its image rather than run it from flash.
> Not a problem, however when the system reboots it loses all of its
> configuration information as far as I can tell. Is this normal? Is there no
> NVRAM inside or perhaps I've got a dead battery somewhere? Alternatively,
> is there some way to "upload" the configured image such that I could boot
> _that_ and thus be preconfigured?
The configuration information should be saved. Are you using change,
define, or set? If you you set, only the volatile configuration is
changed. define changes only the permanent configuration, and change
changes both.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
> Hans B Pufal wrote:
>
>I tried to get PCW interetsed in getting the collection scanned and
on
>line but had no luck. Perhaps it's time to ask again, just their OK
to
>put up scans more than, say, 10 years old would be helpful.
At least they now make their magazine available
on CD-ROM (both for subscribers and just
straight purchase even if you do no subscribe).
I think adverts and so on are omitted (apparently copyright
usually rests with the advertiser), but all the articles seem
to be present.
No use now, but scanning wil be unnecessary
10 years from now :-)
Antonio
Hello all,
i located a CTM-70 desk size computer and need some more information.
Here is what i have (correction welcome):
CTM is probably short for "Computertechnik M?ller", located in
southern Germany in the early 1970s. Mr M?ller produced one or two
dozends of his computers, then CTM went out of business. He went on to
design the hyperstone processor. The hyperstone company promised to
take a look at their archive, but i did not get any response after
this first one.
The machine is built into a desk, complete with keyboard, monitor,
printer and three 8" drives. There is no documentation on the machine,
the only software is costum made.
I am looking for information on the hardware, the operating system (if
any), and pinouts of the keyboard, printer and monitor connectors.
Thanks,
Martin K?ser
I've got a stack of 11/03 / 11/23 qbus enclosures on my workbench
out in my garage, and I've *never* seen hardware so *dirty* - this
has a good 10-15 years worth of dust and dirt on it.
Any suggestions/tips for cleaning and reassembling older equipment?
Is there a FAQ anywhere? I know Dave M. mentioned using some kind of
alcohol to clean backplane slots on his -8E...
(I know, first rule: "document where everything goes")
Bill
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
Austin, TX
"TRON" is also "Trace On" in MS-BASIC.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Pechter [mailto:pechter@bg-tc-ppp1516.monmouth.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 7:13 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Foonly
> > All this talk makes me wonder (and I know this question has been
answered
> > before, but I have forgotten): what equipment did they use to do the
> > computer graphics in movie Tron?
>
> The "Flooney F1" which was a PDP-10 clone. TRON is apparently a PDP-10
> opcode. What I can't remember is what OS they used.
>
> Zane
Foonly F1...
I believe they ran a Tops-10 varient.
Bill
---
Bill Gates is a Persian cat and a monocle away from being a
villain in a James Bond movie -- Dennis Miller
bpechter@shell.monmouth.com|pechter@pechter.dyndns.org
OT: When I was a kid, we used to have a 30' Wellcraft Scarab Offshore boat.
Not only was it one of the first to have big blocks (Chevy 454's), we had
6-71's on them. This was back in the late 70's early 80's, when the
professional offshore racers where CID limited, normally aspirated. Once a
year they'd come to Lake St. Clair in MI for a race. They'd be all decked
out in their flack jacket/life vests, full-face helmuts, and we'd BLOW past
them with our stereo blasting, girls sittin' on the back in bikini's. Boy
did THAT pi$$ them off!
Gary
> DQ wrote:
>
> [Memory lane, snipped]
>
> Thanks for that ;-)
>
> > I still get chills when I hear the blower on the 327 on Mad Max's
> > car in the first movie... didn't that have an Edelbrock manifold?
>
> I remember thinking that it looked like it had a 6-71 on it, and
> Edelbrock certainly makes (or at least made) manifolds for
> suck-through
> applications of the 6-71. However I also remember the blower being
> clutched, which made little sense -- unless it was a blow-through
> application with some sort of bypass for when the blower was shut
> down.
>
> Whatever. It had that nice 6-71 whine, which is what
> _really_ matters :-)
Would be great if you could make that available to all of us.
By the way, does anyone have any other stuff from old mags scanned and uploaded anywhere on teh web? I'm very interested in getting as much as I can, and also if anyone has any spare mags for sale I collect these too!
Shaun
> Paul Williams wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have Vol. 1, No. 2 of this magazine, dated June 1978? They
> > reviewed the 380Z in that issue. I know this because No. 6 includes the
> > following update, partially quoted here for the benefit of the other
> > 380Z owners on this list:
>
> Yes I have the complete run from first issue till sometime in the late
> 80's when the magazine became boring like all the others.
>
> I will dig out the article and scan it for you.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- HBP
> My general reaction, is good luck! Your best bet at this point in
> timewill be to track down /23+ boards with both the CIS and FP
> installed (which
> probably won't be easy). However, do you really need CIS? From
> what I've
> seen it falls more in the interesting to have, rather than the
> need to
> have, unless you've some sort of business need for it.
My interest is about do some probes with COBOL and another compiler(s)
that could take advantage of this option, checking the differences
in speed and reliability with and without the CIS.
Greetings
Sergio